Re: portupgrade-devel: portversion -vl'<' does not show current version
On Thursday 09 April 2009 23:22:17 Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > OK. I've just committed a patch. > [...SKIP...] Sem, what about to restore old functionality with repacking dependent packages by portupgrade -rp ? With last versions of portupgrade it works only for bumped/rebuilded packages, but not for all affected tree as it was been in early versions. -- Dmitry "Red Fox" Panov @ Home FreeBSD since September, 1995 Khabarovsk, Russia Skype:dima.panov | Jabber.org:fluffy.khv | ICQ:1745024 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: portupgrade-devel: portversion -vl'<' does not show current version
Robert Huff wrote: Sandra Kachelmann writes: I _really_ still miss this functionality :-( Could you please re-implement it? Try the "-F" switch. (I believe this used to be the default, but Something Happened(tm) within the last year to make it necessary to use it explicitly. There was a message (somewhere) about making it the default again ,,, but that seems to have not happened.) Yeap, it was a side effect of one patch I got. I've just fixed it. -- Dixi. Sem. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: portupgrade-devel: portversion -vl'<' does not show current version
OK. I've just committed a patch. Sandra Kachelmann wrote: Hi I _really_ still miss this functionality :-( Could you please re-implement it? Sandra Sergey Matveychuk Date 3 Jul 2008 09:50:58 Subject Re: portupgrade-devel: portversion -vl'<' does not show current version Message-ID 486ca0af.3020...@freebsd.org In reply to Sandra Kachelmann References to Sandra Kachelmann Replies Robert Huff Referenced by Robert Huff, Sergey Matveychuk Sandra Kachelmann wrote: After upgrading from portupgrade to portupgrade-devel the command $ portversion -vl'<' does not show the _current_ version anymore. Why was it removed? I found the information useful. before: gnutls-2.4.0< needs updating (port has 2.4.1) now: gnutls < needs updating (port has 2.4.1) Looks like it's a side effect of new options implementation. Now you can use -Fvl options. But I'll think to back this functionality. Thanks. -- Dixi. Sem. -- Dixi. Sem. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: portupgrade-devel: portversion -vl'<' does not show current version
Sandra Kachelmann writes: > I _really_ still miss this functionality :-( Could you please > re-implement it? Try the "-F" switch. (I believe this used to be the default, but Something Happened(tm) within the last year to make it necessary to use it explicitly. There was a message (somewhere) about making it the default again ,,, but that seems to have not happened.) Robert Huff ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: portupgrade-devel: portversion -vl'<' does not show current version
Hi I _really_ still miss this functionality :-( Could you please re-implement it? Sandra Sergey Matveychuk Date 3 Jul 2008 09:50:58 Subject Re: portupgrade-devel: portversion -vl'<' does not show current version Message-ID 486ca0af.3020...@freebsd.org In reply to Sandra Kachelmann References to Sandra Kachelmann Replies Robert Huff Referenced by Robert Huff, Sergey Matveychuk Sandra Kachelmann wrote: > After upgrading from portupgrade to portupgrade-devel the command > > $ portversion -vl'<' > > does not show the _current_ version anymore. Why was it removed? I > found the information useful. > > before: > gnutls-2.4.0< needs updating (port has 2.4.1) > > now: > gnutls < needs updating (port has 2.4.1) Looks like it's a side effect of new options implementation. Now you can use -Fvl options. But I'll think to back this functionality. Thanks. -- Dixi. Sem. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: portupgrade-devel: portversion -vl'<' does not show current version
Robert Huff wrote: Sergey Matveychuk writes: > After upgrading from portupgrade to portupgrade-devel the command > > $ portversion -vl'<' > > does not show the _current_ version anymore. Why was it removed? I > found the information useful. > > before: > gnutls-2.4.0< needs updating (port has 2.4.1) > > now: > gnutls < needs updating (port has 2.4.1) Confirmed. Looks like it's a side effect of new options implementation. Now you can use -Fvl options. But I'll think to back this functionality. The man page for 2.4.4 does not have a "-F" option. I was already notified. Thanks. It will be fixed soon. -- Dixi. Sem. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: portupgrade-devel: portversion -vl'<' does not show current version
Sergey Matveychuk writes: > > After upgrading from portupgrade to portupgrade-devel the command > > > > $ portversion -vl'<' > > > > does not show the _current_ version anymore. Why was it removed? I > > found the information useful. > > > > before: > > gnutls-2.4.0< needs updating (port has 2.4.1) > > > > now: > > gnutls < needs updating (port has 2.4.1) Confirmed. > Looks like it's a side effect of new options implementation. Now > you can use -Fvl options. But I'll think to back this > functionality. The man page for 2.4.4 does not have a "-F" option. Robert Huff ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: portupgrade-devel: portversion -vl'<' does not show current version
Sandra Kachelmann wrote: After upgrading from portupgrade to portupgrade-devel the command $ portversion -vl'<' does not show the _current_ version anymore. Why was it removed? I found the information useful. before: gnutls-2.4.0< needs updating (port has 2.4.1) now: gnutls < needs updating (port has 2.4.1) Looks like it's a side effect of new options implementation. Now you can use -Fvl options. But I'll think to back this functionality. Thanks. -- Dixi. Sem. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
portupgrade-devel: portversion -vl'<' does not show current version
After upgrading from portupgrade to portupgrade-devel the command $ portversion -vl'<' does not show the _current_ version anymore. Why was it removed? I found the information useful. before: gnutls-2.4.0< needs updating (port has 2.4.1) now: gnutls < needs updating (port has 2.4.1) S. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
