Re: print/cm-super size mismatch
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: I had this problem yesterday, when it was fixed last week. My guess is that that the bug is not still there but that it was renewed. I am thinking that distfile was updated yet again. By the way, does someone knows why cm-super is listed as a dependency of print/teTeX while it is obviously *not* necessary to run teTeX and is a very big download? Notably since there exist other conversions of the Computer Modern fonts to Type1 requiring infinitely less space than cm-super, for example: http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/fonts/ps-type1/cm-lgc/ -- Michel TALON ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: print/cm-super size mismatch
Heino Tiedemann wrote: Hiroki Sato h...@freebsd.org wrote: Frank Shute fr...@shute.org.uk wrote in 20081206083250.ga54...@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk: fr Hi, fr fr I just had a problem when building print/cm-super. This was because the distfile was updated. The port was also updated just now, so please try the latest ports tree. Thank you for the report! This Bug ist still There. I updated my ports collection, I deleteed all in my distfile folder - then I tried it today, und got this: I had this problem yesterday, when it was fixed last week. My guess is that that the bug is not still there but that it was renewed. I am thinking that distfile was updated yet again. The odd thing was that even the distfile on the freebsd site was wrong. Shouldn't the distfile on the freebsd site be the one that the port wants, rather than whatever the master sites have? Stephen ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
print/cm-super size mismatch
Hi, I just had a problem when building print/cm-super. cm-super.zip doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. = Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/TeX/CTAN/fonts/ps-type1/. fetch: ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/TeX/CTAN/fonts/ps-type1/cm-super.zip: size mismatch: expected 67310332, actual 67319909 = Attempting to fetch from ftp://ctan.unsw.edu.au/tex-archive/fonts/ps-type1/. fetch: ftp://ctan.unsw.edu.au/tex-archive/fonts/ps-type1/cm-super.zip: Connection refused = Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.tex.ac.uk/tex-archive/fonts/ps-type1/. fetch: ftp://ftp.tex.ac.uk/tex-archive/fonts/ps-type1/cm-super.zip: size mismatch: expected 67310332, actual 67319909 = Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.kddlabs.co.jp/CTAN/fonts/ps-type1/. It did fetch it from the jp mirror but slowly build it. But I would have thought that the tarball at ftp.tex.ac.uk would be the canonical one. Any thoughts? Apologies if this has been reported before. Regards, -- Frank Contact info: http://www.shute.org.uk/misc/contact.html ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: print/cm-super size mismatch
Frank Shute [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]: fr Hi, fr fr I just had a problem when building print/cm-super. fr fr cm-super.zip doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. fr = Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/TeX/CTAN/fonts/ps-type1/. fr fetch: ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/TeX/CTAN/fonts/ps-type1/cm-super.zip: size mismatch: expected 67310332, actual 67319909 fr = Attempting to fetch from ftp://ctan.unsw.edu.au/tex-archive/fonts/ps-type1/. fr fetch: ftp://ctan.unsw.edu.au/tex-archive/fonts/ps-type1/cm-super.zip: Connection refused fr = Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.tex.ac.uk/tex-archive/fonts/ps-type1/. fr fetch: ftp://ftp.tex.ac.uk/tex-archive/fonts/ps-type1/cm-super.zip: size mismatch: expected 67310332, actual 67319909 fr = Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.kddlabs.co.jp/CTAN/fonts/ps-type1/. fr fr It did fetch it from the jp mirror but slowly build it. fr fr But I would have thought that the tarball at ftp.tex.ac.uk would be fr the canonical one. Any thoughts? This was because the distfile was updated. The port was also updated just now, so please try the latest ports tree. Thank you for the report! -- | Hiroki SATO pgpOeWTP0CXvg.pgp Description: PGP signature
