Re: sysutils/fusefs-ntfs & fusefs_enable="YES"

2013-08-22 Thread Mark Felder
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013, at 8:16, RW wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 06:41:33 -0500
> Mark Felder wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013, at 17:09, RW wrote:
> 
> > > I see what's happened. Earlier in the year,against my better
> > > judgement, I move to CURRENT in futile attempt to make intel KMS
> > > work. It looks like fuse has been moved into the base system,
> > > but /etc/rc.d/ hasn't yet been updated to reflect that. 
> > >
> > 
> > There isn't an /etc/rc.d/ for every kernel module. If you want to use
> > fuse on FreeBSD 10 and later just put fuse_load="YES" in loader.conf.
> > The rc.d script in the port was just a nice courtesy. I don't think
> > it's likely we'll see an /etc/rc.d/fuse script appear in the base
> > system.
> 
> I have added it to loader.conf, but the reason I brought it up was that
> I thought the documentation might be out of date, which appears to be
> the case. 
> 
> If nothing's been decided I can't really submit a documentation
> patch.
> 
> If anyone's interested the relevant files are:
> 
> sysutils/ntfsprogs/files/README.FreeBSD
> sysutils/fusefs-ntfs/files/README.FreeBSD
> 

I forgot about the READMEs that come with those ports. We might want to
mention FreeBSD 10+ specific setup there I guess.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: sysutils/fusefs-ntfs & fusefs_enable="YES"

2013-08-22 Thread RW
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 06:41:33 -0500
Mark Felder wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013, at 17:09, RW wrote:

> > I see what's happened. Earlier in the year,against my better
> > judgement, I move to CURRENT in futile attempt to make intel KMS
> > work. It looks like fuse has been moved into the base system,
> > but /etc/rc.d/ hasn't yet been updated to reflect that. 
> >
> 
> There isn't an /etc/rc.d/ for every kernel module. If you want to use
> fuse on FreeBSD 10 and later just put fuse_load="YES" in loader.conf.
> The rc.d script in the port was just a nice courtesy. I don't think
> it's likely we'll see an /etc/rc.d/fuse script appear in the base
> system.

I have added it to loader.conf, but the reason I brought it up was that
I thought the documentation might be out of date, which appears to be
the case. 

If nothing's been decided I can't really submit a documentation
patch.

If anyone's interested the relevant files are:

sysutils/ntfsprogs/files/README.FreeBSD
sysutils/fusefs-ntfs/files/README.FreeBSD
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: sysutils/fusefs-ntfs & fusefs_enable="YES"

2013-08-22 Thread Mark Felder
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013, at 17:09, RW wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 23:44:41 +0200
> Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> 
> > On 21/08/2013 23:39, RW wrote:
> > > The README.FreeBSD file for sysutils/fusefs-ntfs and several howtos
> > > suggest adding the line:
> > > 
> > > fusefs_enable="YES"
> > > 
> > > to rc.conf, but as far as I can see this doesn't affect anything
> > > since the port doesn't install an rc.d file. I would have expected
> > > such a file to load the fuse kernel module which I'm having to load
> > > myself.
> > 
> > The file is there. fusefs-kmod
> 
> I see what's happened. Earlier in the year,against my better judgement,
> I move to CURRENT in futile attempt to make intel KMS work. It looks
> like fuse has been moved into the base system, but /etc/rc.d/ hasn't yet
> been updated to reflect that. 
>

There isn't an /etc/rc.d/ for every kernel module. If you want to use
fuse on FreeBSD 10 and later just put fuse_load="YES" in loader.conf.
The rc.d script in the port was just a nice courtesy. I don't think it's
likely we'll see an /etc/rc.d/fuse script appear in the base system.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: sysutils/fusefs-ntfs & fusefs_enable="YES"

2013-08-21 Thread RW
On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 23:44:41 +0200
Dominic Fandrey wrote:

> On 21/08/2013 23:39, RW wrote:
> > The README.FreeBSD file for sysutils/fusefs-ntfs and several howtos
> > suggest adding the line:
> > 
> > fusefs_enable="YES"
> > 
> > to rc.conf, but as far as I can see this doesn't affect anything
> > since the port doesn't install an rc.d file. I would have expected
> > such a file to load the fuse kernel module which I'm having to load
> > myself.
> 
> The file is there. fusefs-kmod

I see what's happened. Earlier in the year,against my better judgement,
I move to CURRENT in futile attempt to make intel KMS work. It looks
like fuse has been moved into the base system, but /etc/rc.d/ hasn't yet
been updated to reflect that. 
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: sysutils/fusefs-ntfs & fusefs_enable="YES"

2013-08-21 Thread Dominic Fandrey
On 21/08/2013 23:39, RW wrote:
> The README.FreeBSD file for sysutils/fusefs-ntfs and several howtos
> suggest adding the line:
> 
> fusefs_enable="YES"
> 
> to rc.conf, but as far as I can see this doesn't affect anything since
> the port doesn't install an rc.d file. I would have expected such a
> file to load the fuse kernel module which I'm having to load myself.

The file is there. fusefs-kmod

-- 
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? 
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


sysutils/fusefs-ntfs & fusefs_enable="YES"

2013-08-21 Thread RW
The README.FreeBSD file for sysutils/fusefs-ntfs and several howtos
suggest adding the line:

fusefs_enable="YES"

to rc.conf, but as far as I can see this doesn't affect anything since
the port doesn't install an rc.d file. I would have expected such a
file to load the fuse kernel module which I'm having to load myself.

Has something fallen off here? Perhaps the README file should
just recommend adding fuse_load=YES to loader.conf.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"