this time it's vim/distfiles
When portmaster tries to rebuild vim-lite, it tries to verify the checksums of 239 (?) patches. (I guess I should take that as a warning.) Unfortunately, one of them apparently doesn't check out properly. Here's an excerpt of the portmaster output. = MD5 Checksum OK for vim/7.2.040 = SHA256 Checksum OK for vim/7.2.040. = No MD5 checksum recorded for vim/7.2.041^. = No SHA256 checksum recorded for vim/7.2.041^. = No suitable checksum found for vim/7.2.041^. = MD5 Checksum OK for vim/7.2.042. = SHA256 Checksum OK for vim/7.2.042. . . . = MD5 Checksum OK for vim/7.2.239. = SHA256 Checksum OK for vim/7.2.239. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/editors/vim-lite. === make failed for editors/vim-lite === Aborting update === Update for vim-lite-7.2.209 failed === Aborting update I looked in distfiles and found that the line in question apparently had an extraneous character that displays in less and vi as a percent sign. DISTFILE:vim/7.2.040:SIZE=1836:SHA256=ad320d45c2541a767b351fdb8720c349c468acec8cf54dcfced0a6d1e58e5d8e:MD5=4c493255ae227498016f30a0002ec1cc DISTFILE:vim/7.2.041%:SIZE=22405:SHA256=2f48e173df3d306edd982f8a3d5a15c65ba19694ca32bdbdaa51f8bcc48a3d06:MD5=107ba5dccb1df727601aead37abf8cd3 DISTFILE:vim/7.2.042:SIZE=4987:SHA256=d5fa884a7c5ee77b60fe512ceccaac640c0dfc00bd435211f4e4597ae3bee2cd:MD5=99baedef8a9c908774b7ed74deacf184 I tried deleting the extra character and rerunning portmaster, but that just yields the same results. Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG ** * Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu * ** * A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good * * objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments * * -- a standing army. * *-- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 * ** ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: this time it's vim/distfiles
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 08:05:20AM -0500, Scott Bennett wrote: When portmaster tries to rebuild vim-lite, it tries to verify the checksums of 239 (?) patches. (I guess I should take that as a warning.) Unfortunately, one of them apparently doesn't check out properly. Here's an excerpt of the portmaster output. = MD5 Checksum OK for vim/7.2.040 = SHA256 Checksum OK for vim/7.2.040. = No MD5 checksum recorded for vim/7.2.041^. = No SHA256 checksum recorded for vim/7.2.041^. = No suitable checksum found for vim/7.2.041^. = MD5 Checksum OK for vim/7.2.042. = SHA256 Checksum OK for vim/7.2.042. . . . = MD5 Checksum OK for vim/7.2.239. = SHA256 Checksum OK for vim/7.2.239. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/editors/vim-lite. === make failed for editors/vim-lite === Aborting update === Update for vim-lite-7.2.209 failed === Aborting update I looked in distfiles and found that the line in question apparently had an extraneous character that displays in less and vi as a percent sign. DISTFILE:vim/7.2.040:SIZE=1836:SHA256=ad320d45c2541a767b351fdb8720c349c468acec8cf54dcfced0a6d1e58e5d8e:MD5=4c493255ae227498016f30a0002ec1cc DISTFILE:vim/7.2.041%:SIZE=22405:SHA256=2f48e173df3d306edd982f8a3d5a15c65ba19694ca32bdbdaa51f8bcc48a3d06:MD5=107ba5dccb1df727601aead37abf8cd3 DISTFILE:vim/7.2.042:SIZE=4987:SHA256=d5fa884a7c5ee77b60fe512ceccaac640c0dfc00bd435211f4e4597ae3bee2cd:MD5=99baedef8a9c908774b7ed74deacf184 I tried deleting the extra character and rerunning portmaster, but that just yields the same results. Don't just delete it. Change it to a ^ and you should be OK until the maintainer updates distinfo to reflect the recent change. -- WXS ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: this time it's vim/distfiles
In message 200907291305.n6td5kst010...@mp.cs.niu.edu, Scott Bennett (benn...@cs.niu.edu) wrote: When portmaster tries to rebuild vim-lite, it tries to verify the checksums of 239 (?) patches. (I guess I should take that as a warning.) Unfortunately, one of them apparently doesn't check out properly. Here's an excerpt of the portmaster output. = MD5 Checksum OK for vim/7.2.040 = SHA256 Checksum OK for vim/7.2.040. = No MD5 checksum recorded for vim/7.2.041^. = No SHA256 checksum recorded for vim/7.2.041^. = No suitable checksum found for vim/7.2.041^. = MD5 Checksum OK for vim/7.2.042. = SHA256 Checksum OK for vim/7.2.042. . . . = MD5 Checksum OK for vim/7.2.239. = SHA256 Checksum OK for vim/7.2.239. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/editors/vim-lite. === make failed for editors/vim-lite === Aborting update === Update for vim-lite-7.2.209 failed === Aborting update I looked in distfiles and found that the line in question apparently had an extraneous character that displays in less and vi as a percent sign. DISTFILE:vim/7.2.040:SIZE=1836:SHA256=ad320d45c2541a767b351fdb8720c349c468acec8cf54dcfced0a6d1e58e5d8e:MD5=4c493255ae227498016f30a0002ec1cc DISTFILE:vim/7.2.041%:SIZE=22405:SHA256=2f48e173df3d306edd982f8a3d5a15c65ba19694ca32bdbdaa51f8bcc48a3d06:MD5=107ba5dccb1df727601aead37abf8cd3 DISTFILE:vim/7.2.042:SIZE=4987:SHA256=d5fa884a7c5ee77b60fe512ceccaac640c0dfc00bd435211f4e4597ae3bee2cd:MD5=99baedef8a9c908774b7ed74deacf184 NB: you should be looking in editors/vim since editors/vim-lite is a slave port. The Makefile and distinfo files have different names for the patch - the maintainer appears to have decided to rename the patch file earlier today and only updated Makefile accordingly. The old name was 7.2.041% and the new is to 7.2.041^. Try changing distinfo accordingly. Cheers, Nick. -- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: this time it's vim/distfiles
Scott Bennett wrote: When portmaster tries to rebuild vim-lite, it tries to verify the checksums of 239 (?) patches. To be a little more accurate, the ports infrastructure is doing the verification. Portmaster just calls 'make checksum'. I looked in distfiles and found that the line in question apparently had an extraneous character that displays in less and vi as a percent sign. DISTFILE:vim/7.2.040:SIZE=1836:SHA256=ad320d45c2541a767b351fdb8720c349c468acec8cf54dcfced0a6d1e58e5d8e:MD5=4c493255ae227498016f30a0002ec1cc DISTFILE:vim/7.2.041%:SIZE=22405:SHA256=2f48e173df3d306edd982f8a3d5a15c65ba19694ca32bdbdaa51f8bcc48a3d06:MD5=107ba5dccb1df727601aead37abf8cd3 DISTFILE:vim/7.2.042:SIZE=4987:SHA256=d5fa884a7c5ee77b60fe512ceccaac640c0dfc00bd435211f4e4597ae3bee2cd:MD5=99baedef8a9c908774b7ed74deacf184 The information stored in /var/db/ports/*/distfiles is only used to make sure all of the distfiles associated with a port are deleted if the user chooses that option. The checksum information is stored, but is not used at this time. See also http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=106483 hth, Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: this time it's vim/distfiles
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 02:59:56PM +0100, N.J. Mann wrote: Try changing distinfo accordingly. You can use your favourite editor or run the following commands as root # cd /usr/ports/editors/vim # sed -I .orig -e 's/7\.2\.041%/7.2.041^/' distinfo -- In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move. -- Douglas Adams 1952 - 2001 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: this time it's vim/distfiles
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Esa Karkkainene...@iki.fi wrote: On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 02:59:56PM +0100, N.J. Mann wrote: Try changing distinfo accordingly. You can use your favourite editor or run the following commands as root # cd /usr/ports/editors/vim # sed -I .orig -e 's/7\.2\.041%/7.2.041^/' distinfo That shouldn't fix the problem, because according to the OP's error: = No MD5 checksum recorded for vim/7.2.041^. = No SHA256 checksum recorded for vim/7.2.041^. = No suitable checksum found for vim/7.2.041^. Meaning, there is no checksum for the file with '^' in place of '%'. -- Glen Barber ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: this time it's vim/distfiles
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 04:12:05PM -0400, Glen Barber wrote: On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Esa Karkkainene...@iki.fi wrote: On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 02:59:56PM +0100, N.J. Mann wrote: Try changing distinfo accordingly. You can use your favourite editor or run the following commands as root # cd /usr/ports/editors/vim # sed -I .orig -e 's/7\.2\.041%/7.2.041^/' distinfo That shouldn't fix the problem, because according to the OP's error: = No MD5 checksum recorded for vim/7.2.041^. = No SHA256 checksum recorded for vim/7.2.041^. = No suitable checksum found for vim/7.2.041^. Meaning, there is no checksum for the file with '^' in place of '%'. That sed line will replace the % with a ^, but it doesn't matter anymore. I just committed a fix for this. Please give it time to mirror out and you should be fine. -- WXS ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: this time it's vim/distfiles
In message 4ad871310907291312s6f4e1c1dx7e91e5d61b5c4...@mail.gmail.com, Glen Barber (glen.j.bar...@gmail.com) wrote: On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Esa Karkkainene...@iki.fi wrote: On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 02:59:56PM +0100, N.J. Mann wrote: Try changing distinfo accordingly. You can use your favourite editor or run the following commands as root # cd /usr/ports/editors/vim # sed -I .orig -e 's/7\.2\.041%/7.2.041^/' distinfo That shouldn't fix the problem, because according to the OP's error: = No MD5 checksum recorded for vim/7.2.041^. = No SHA256 checksum recorded for vim/7.2.041^. = No suitable checksum found for vim/7.2.041^. Meaning, there is no checksum for the file with '^' in place of '%'. I think you have missed the point. The Makefile has been updated to include the renaming of the patch file from 7.2.041% to 7.2.41^, whereas the distinfo file _has not_. So, the distinfo has no checksums for 7.2.041^. Instead it has them for 7.2.041%. So I think Esa's idea is correct. 1 minute later Wesley Shields (wxs@) has just committed a fix to the distfile, so those affected should re-sync their port trees. Cheers, Nick. -- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
