Re: x11-toolkits/mx build fail
Le 26/05/2013 21:54, Lowell Gilbert a écrit : > Beeblebrox writes: > >> Sorry, my bad - port is part of marcuscom-gnome3 apparently. I have had so >> many port-build fails (consistently over a long period) that a neglected to >> check the port origin. >> Will report issue to marcuscom-gnome3 > > You have been issuing a *lot* of e-mails to the ports lists about > failure that do not occur in any other environment than yours. > > *Please* stop sending out such messages until you have fixed your own > environment. Just to support your comment. Beeblebrox: you're reporting many bugs without trying any fix by yourself, you don't care of others requests to start from a clean (from zero) environment. And over all, working on -CURRENT brings his lot of (possible) issues. You shouldn't use -CURRENT if you're not able by yourself to fix problems, at least trying to do something and stop losing your time and time of others reading error messages that doesn't makes sens. Again, it is *not* useful/usable to send error logs at every fail. -- Florent Peterschmitt | /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign flor...@peterschmitt.fr| \ / - No HTML/RTF in E-mail +33 (0)6 64 33 97 92 | X - No proprietary attachments http://florent.peterschmitt.fr | / \ - Respect for open standards signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: x11-toolkits/mx build fail
Beeblebrox writes: > Sorry, my bad - port is part of marcuscom-gnome3 apparently. I have had so > many port-build fails (consistently over a long period) that a neglected to > check the port origin. > Will report issue to marcuscom-gnome3 You have been issuing a *lot* of e-mails to the ports lists about failure that do not occur in any other environment than yours. *Please* stop sending out such messages until you have fixed your own environment. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: x11-toolkits/mx build fail
Sorry, my bad - port is part of marcuscom-gnome3 apparently. I have had so many port-build fails (consistently over a long period) that a neglected to check the port origin. Will report issue to marcuscom-gnome3 Regards. - 10-Current-amd64-using ccache-portstree merged with marcuscom.gnome3 & xorg.devel -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/x11-toolkits-mx-build-fail-tp5815213p5815227.html Sent from the freebsd-ports mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: x11-toolkits/mx build fail
Beeblebrox writes: > port fails to build in poudriere and on host with exact same output. That port doesn't currently exist, as far as I can see. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
x11-toolkits/mx build fail
port fails to build in poudriere and on host with exact same output. On host no ccache, no FORCE_MAKE_JOBS, compiler is defalt (port selected). poudriere uses ccache. Full log output: https://docs.google.com/document/d/16w7uX0jv0XVs3qwJXToYeUfmLvAzHE52_B8q_35FT6g/edit?usp=sharing - 10-Current-amd64-using ccache-portstree merged with marcuscom.gnome3 & xorg.devel -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/x11-toolkits-mx-build-fail-tp5815213.html Sent from the freebsd-ports mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
