Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-python@FreeBSD.org
Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker Resp. Description o ports/185470 python [NEW PORT] devel/py-peewee (a small, expressive Python o ports/185443 python [Maintainer Update] devel/py-robotframework-selenium2l o ports/185078 python maintainer update : sysutils/py-halite o ports/185071 python lang/python33 : python3-config --ldflags returning bad o ports/184954 python Installation checks prevent multiple python ports bein a ports/182951 python databases/py-sqlite3: compilation error with Clang f ports/181593 python math/py-numpy maintainer gone o ports/178301 python [patch] lang/python2[67]: SEM option is inconsistent f ports/178242 python bsd.python.mk injection of @exec easy_install to PLIST o ports/170788 python lang/python27: PyQT applications crash Python 2.7 (cor f ports/170566 python update graphics/py-opengl depends on old version of gc o ports/168640 python [PATCH]: prevent checksum mismatches for compiled pyth o ports/167368 python [bsd.python.mk] [patch] Python version propagation bre f ports/154209 python [PATCH] lang/python: Install symlink for ptags 14 problems total. ___ freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-python To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-python-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [CFR] lang/python26 removal
René Ladan wrote on 05.01.2014 15:57: Hi, lang/python26 expired a few days ago, so I patched Mk/bsd.pyton.mk to exclude lang/python26 and patched the USE_PYTHON* lines of all ports referring to Python 2.7. You must remove lang/python26 manually to not break INDEX. The patch is available at http://people.freebsd.org/~rene/patches/python-to-27.diff The bsd.python.mk patch itself is also here: http://people.freebsd.org/~rene/patches/Mk__bsd.python.mk.diff mat@ already gave an OK for the USE_PYTHON* bumps. Does this patch and removing lang/python26 look OK to you? I'm not on python@ , so please CC me. Regards, René I'd say please go on with that. But there is two things there, that would be great to be fixed before commiting: - value of 2 need to be used instead of 2.7 in USE_PYTHON in your patch - there is remnants of 2.6 in lang/python-doc-html/distinfo that isn't covered by your patch. -- Regards, Ruslan T.O.S. Of Reality ___ freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-python To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-python-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [CFR] lang/python26 removal
2014/1/6 Ruslan Makhmatkhanov cvs-...@yandex.ru: René Ladan wrote on 05.01.2014 15:57: Hi, lang/python26 expired a few days ago, so I patched Mk/bsd.pyton.mk to exclude lang/python26 and patched the USE_PYTHON* lines of all ports referring to Python 2.7. You must remove lang/python26 manually to not break INDEX. The patch is available at http://people.freebsd.org/~rene/patches/python-to-27.diff The bsd.python.mk patch itself is also here: http://people.freebsd.org/~rene/patches/Mk__bsd.python.mk.diff mat@ already gave an OK for the USE_PYTHON* bumps. Does this patch and removing lang/python26 look OK to you? I'm not on python@ , so please CC me. Regards, René I'd say please go on with that. But there is two things there, that would be great to be fixed before commiting: - value of 2 need to be used instead of 2.7 in USE_PYTHON in your patch This is because I converted -2.7 to 2.7 etc. Are you saying that all USE_PYTHON*=2.7 should be converted to USE_PYTHON*=2 and that other USE_PYTHON* values are OK ? - there is remnants of 2.6 in lang/python-doc-html/distinfo that isn't covered by your patch. Thanks, distinfo trimmed. René ___ freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-python To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-python-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [CFR] lang/python26 removal
René Ladan wrote on 06.01.2014 15:34: 2014/1/6 Ruslan Makhmatkhanov cvs-...@yandex.ru: René Ladan wrote on 05.01.2014 15:57: Hi, lang/python26 expired a few days ago, so I patched Mk/bsd.pyton.mk to exclude lang/python26 and patched the USE_PYTHON* lines of all ports referring to Python 2.7. You must remove lang/python26 manually to not break INDEX. The patch is available at http://people.freebsd.org/~rene/patches/python-to-27.diff The bsd.python.mk patch itself is also here: http://people.freebsd.org/~rene/patches/Mk__bsd.python.mk.diff mat@ already gave an OK for the USE_PYTHON* bumps. Does this patch and removing lang/python26 look OK to you? I'm not on python@ , so please CC me. Regards, René I'd say please go on with that. But there is two things there, that would be great to be fixed before commiting: - value of 2 need to be used instead of 2.7 in USE_PYTHON in your patch This is because I converted -2.7 to 2.7 etc. Are you saying that all USE_PYTHON*=2.7 should be converted to USE_PYTHON*=2 and that other USE_PYTHON* values are OK ? I just looked at it again: -2.7 and 2.7 should be converted to just `2' 2.x+ should be converted to just `yes' to keep it's current meaning Will this `yes'-ports actually build with 3.x - that will be checked later for all the tree. I have plans for this. - there is remnants of 2.6 in lang/python-doc-html/distinfo that isn't covered by your patch. Thanks, distinfo trimmed. René -- Regards, Ruslan T.O.S. Of Reality ___ freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-python To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-python-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [CFR] lang/python26 removal
2014/1/6 Ruslan Makhmatkhanov cvs-...@yandex.ru: René Ladan wrote on 06.01.2014 15:34: 2014/1/6 Ruslan Makhmatkhanov cvs-...@yandex.ru: René Ladan wrote on 05.01.2014 15:57: Hi, lang/python26 expired a few days ago, so I patched Mk/bsd.pyton.mk to exclude lang/python26 and patched the USE_PYTHON* lines of all ports referring to Python 2.7. You must remove lang/python26 manually to not break INDEX. The patch is available at http://people.freebsd.org/~rene/patches/python-to-27.diff The bsd.python.mk patch itself is also here: http://people.freebsd.org/~rene/patches/Mk__bsd.python.mk.diff mat@ already gave an OK for the USE_PYTHON* bumps. Does this patch and removing lang/python26 look OK to you? I'm not on python@ , so please CC me. Regards, René I'd say please go on with that. But there is two things there, that would be great to be fixed before commiting: - value of 2 need to be used instead of 2.7 in USE_PYTHON in your patch This is because I converted -2.7 to 2.7 etc. Are you saying that all USE_PYTHON*=2.7 should be converted to USE_PYTHON*=2 and that other USE_PYTHON* values are OK ? I just looked at it again: -2.7 and 2.7 should be converted to just `2' 2.x+ should be converted to just `yes' to keep it's current meaning Will this `yes'-ports actually build with 3.x - that will be checked later for all the tree. I have plans for this. I'll redo the patch with the above two conversion rules and blame any breakage on you :-p Regards, René ___ freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-python To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-python-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [CFR] lang/python26 removal
René Ladan wrote on 06.01.2014 16:00: 2014/1/6 Ruslan Makhmatkhanov cvs-...@yandex.ru: René Ladan wrote on 06.01.2014 15:34: 2014/1/6 Ruslan Makhmatkhanov cvs-...@yandex.ru: René Ladan wrote on 05.01.2014 15:57: Hi, lang/python26 expired a few days ago, so I patched Mk/bsd.pyton.mk to exclude lang/python26 and patched the USE_PYTHON* lines of all ports referring to Python 2.7. You must remove lang/python26 manually to not break INDEX. The patch is available at http://people.freebsd.org/~rene/patches/python-to-27.diff The bsd.python.mk patch itself is also here: http://people.freebsd.org/~rene/patches/Mk__bsd.python.mk.diff mat@ already gave an OK for the USE_PYTHON* bumps. Does this patch and removing lang/python26 look OK to you? I'm not on python@ , so please CC me. Regards, René I'd say please go on with that. But there is two things there, that would be great to be fixed before commiting: - value of 2 need to be used instead of 2.7 in USE_PYTHON in your patch This is because I converted -2.7 to 2.7 etc. Are you saying that all USE_PYTHON*=2.7 should be converted to USE_PYTHON*=2 and that other USE_PYTHON* values are OK ? I just looked at it again: -2.7 and 2.7 should be converted to just `2' 2.x+ should be converted to just `yes' to keep it's current meaning Will this `yes'-ports actually build with 3.x - that will be checked later for all the tree. I have plans for this. I'll redo the patch with the above two conversion rules and blame any breakage on you :-p Regards, René Ok). But please send it here for review). -- Regards, Ruslan T.O.S. Of Reality ___ freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-python To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-python-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Quarterly status report
Dear all, find below a brief list of the stuff we did the last quarter. I'm planning to compile this into the status report to be delivered next week. * py-distribute has been replaced by the refreshed py-setuptools port, which comes with a lot of features to simplify the ways of installing python packages. The change also led us to install everything through setuptools now, which resembles a lot of pip and allows us to do some major cleanup of the distutils installation behaviour. * The implicit lang/python build and run-time dependency was removed from the ports infrastructure. Every port now depends on a specific python version or on the lang/python meta ports. This avoids compatibility issues for ports that depend on python 2.x OR python 3.x exclusively, but use the `python` command, which might point to an incompatible user choice. * lang/python27 was updated to version 2.7.6, lang/python 3.3 was updated to version 3.3.3, lang/pypy was updated to version 2.2.1 * We are currently working on the necessary ifnrastructure quirks to support different python versions for the same port. Most of the work has been done and needs a final confirmation from portmgr before testing starts. Open Tasks: - Develop a high-level and lightweight Python Ports Policy. - Add support for granular dependencies (for example =1.0 or 2.0). - Look at what adding pip (Python Package Index) support looks like. - Convert easy_install to yes and remove easy_install specific in the port - More tasks can be found on the Team's wiki page (see links). Let me know as soon as possible, if something's missing on that list. Cheers Marcus ___ freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-python To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-python-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [CFR] lang/python26 removal
On 01/06/2014 13:09, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote: René Ladan wrote on 06.01.2014 16:00: 2014/1/6 Ruslan Makhmatkhanov cvs-...@yandex.ru: René Ladan wrote on 06.01.2014 15:34: 2014/1/6 Ruslan Makhmatkhanov cvs-...@yandex.ru: René Ladan wrote on 05.01.2014 15:57: Hi, lang/python26 expired a few days ago, so I patched Mk/bsd.pyton.mk to exclude lang/python26 and patched the USE_PYTHON* lines of all ports referring to Python 2.7. You must remove lang/python26 manually to not break INDEX. The patch is available at http://people.freebsd.org/~rene/patches/python-to-27.diff The bsd.python.mk patch itself is also here: http://people.freebsd.org/~rene/patches/Mk__bsd.python.mk.diff mat@ already gave an OK for the USE_PYTHON* bumps. Does this patch and removing lang/python26 look OK to you? I'm not on python@ , so please CC me. Regards, René I'd say please go on with that. But there is two things there, that would be great to be fixed before commiting: - value of 2 need to be used instead of 2.7 in USE_PYTHON in your patch This is because I converted -2.7 to 2.7 etc. Are you saying that all USE_PYTHON*=2.7 should be converted to USE_PYTHON*=2 and that other USE_PYTHON* values are OK ? I just looked at it again: -2.7 and 2.7 should be converted to just `2' 2.x+ should be converted to just `yes' to keep it's current meaning Will this `yes'-ports actually build with 3.x - that will be checked later for all the tree. I have plans for this. I'll redo the patch with the above two conversion rules and blame any breakage on you :-p Regards, René Ok). But please send it here for review). Sure: http://people.freebsd.org/~rene/patches/python-cleanup.diff This patch looks (much) bigger than the previous patch but that is because it includes the removal of lang/python26. René ___ freebsd-python@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-python To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-python-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
