Re: `call' function in `make'
At 2004-05-25T15:44:51+01:00, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > Is there an analogue in BSD `make' of the `call' function in `gmake': > > $(call VARIABLE,PARAM,PARAM,...)? > > Not as such. You can however use the '!=' operator to assign a value > to a variable based on the output of some external command: > > RATIO != sh -c 'echo $$(( $a / $b ))' Hi Matthew, Thanks for your reply. After writing to the list yesterday, I read make(1) carefully, and found what I wanted, namely the shell command for creating `dir1' in this example `Makefile': ### Makefile ## Create directory FOO if it does not exist. create_dir = if test ! -d foo ; then rm -f foo ; mkdir foo ; fi dir1: src1 $(create_dir:S/foo/$@/g) dir2: src2 $(create_dir:foo=$@) ### Makefile ends here However, I don't understand something. The command for `dir1' works perfectly well: % make dir1 if test ! -d dir1 ; then rm -f dir1 ; mkdir dir1 ; fi (`dir1' created) OTOH, the command for `dir2' does not work --- `make' is not expanding the local variable `@': % make dir2 if test ! -d $@ ; then rm -f $@ ; mkdir $@ ; fi (`dir2' not created) Can someone tell me why this is happening? Thanks, Raghavendra. -- N. Raghavendra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | See mail headers for contact Harish-Chandra Research Institute | and OpenPGP details. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
FreeBSD ISDN Modem Support
hi does freebsd support this isdn-modem? ELSA MicroLink ISDN/TLV34 is there a compatible page for isdn modems? thank´s ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Promise ATA100 controller and 160G disks
Hi, does anyone know if the Promise ATA100 controller PCI card supports 160 G disks on -STABLE? Thanks, --Stijn -- Nostalgia ain't what it used to be. pgpM1IBIPl6pf.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: portupgrade configuration
On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 00:50, Robin Becker wrote: > Is there a way to list all of my exceptional port settings? Can I make > these available to portupgrade automatically somehow? portupgrade port settings can be set in the /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf file. See MAKE_ARGS in this file. Cheers, -- Nelis Lamprecht PGP: http://www.8ball.co.za/pgpkey/nelis.asc "Unix IS user friendly.. It's just selective about who its friends are." signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Strange pkg_info output
> > On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 14:01:11 EDT, Chuck Swiger scribbled these > curious markings: > > >pkg_info: package bsdpan-DBD-mysql-2.9003 has no origin recorded > > >pkg_info: package bsdpan-DBI-1.42 has no origin recorded > > >pkg_info: package bsdpan-GD-1.19 has no origin recorded > > > > >Should I be worried about this? Or, how do I fix this? > > The messages are telling you that when you installed the package, BSDPAN > did register it into the package database, but it (obviously) has no > information about where from the ports tree you installed it; e.g., if > you installed DBI from the ports tree, its origin would be > databases/p5-DBI. Why you're installing packages that are in the ports > tree without using the ports tree is beyond me. That's not true. The only packages I ever installed is portupgrade and cvsup. I used the ports tree for everything else. > > I would be interested in a fix for this as well, however. > > The simplest solution would be to create a port out of the module in > question. It's extremely simple; a typical Perl module's port makefile > fits on one 80x25 console screen, and its pkg-plist would fit on an > 80x10 screen :). I've done this myself a number of times. Just remember > that if you put the port in the category Makefile (e.g. > databases/Makefile), any subsequent cvsup / cvs update will remove your > changes. > > -- > I abhor a system designed for the "user", if that word is a coded > pejorative meaning "stupid and unsophisticated". -- Ken Thompson > - > Unix is user friendly. However, it isn't idiot friendly. > - > Please CC me in all replies, even if I'm on the relevant list(s). > > ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Sound Capture/Editing under Freebsd
look at ports for these "rawrec" "sox" "lame" On Thu, 20 May 2004, Dragoncrest wrote: > Went looking all over the internet for this and can't find anything. I'm > looking for either a console based or graphically based (preferably the > second) sound capture and possibly a sound editing program. What I'm doing > is converting all my old audio tapes to MP3 before the tapes die and the > only way to do this for me right now is to dust off my old windows box and > do it there, which I'd prefer not to do if possible. I'd rather do it > under Freebsd if I could. What I'd be doing is taking an audio feed from > the tape player to the Line-In jack on the sound card, then capturing the > video directly from there. Anyone know of a tool under Freebsd that'll do > that? Again, I looked and couldn't find anything. I googled several times > too and got nothing. So any pointers or help would be welcome. Thanks. > > ___ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
mplayer + realaudio ... what to expect when installing ...
Hello, I have a simple goal - to convert realaudio files I have saved to my drive into mp3s, on the fbsd command line. The answer, I have been told, is to install mplayer with realaudio support, and then just: mplayer file.ra -ao pcm That sounds reasonable. But I have two issues. First, I see no mplayer+realaudio in the ports tree - just mplayer. How do I get realaudio support into mplayer ? Second, just what kind of install is mplayer (and mplayer + realaudio, for that matter) ?? I want to keep this system nice and clean - and I will be upset if mplayer installs a million dependencies, or does something lame like install X for me, when I don't want it. So can someone describe just what an mplayer install is like ... and how to keep it from installing X, etc., if that is what it does ? thanks. __ Do you Yahoo!? Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger. http://messenger.yahoo.com/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Strange pkg_info output
[Jorn Argelo] > Recently I came across something which kind of bothered me. Every time > when pkg_info removes and/or registers a package it gives this output: > > pkg_info: package bsdpan-DBD-mysql-2.9003 has no origin recorded > pkg_info: package bsdpan-DBI-1.42 has no origin recorded > pkg_info: package bsdpan-GD-1.19 has no origin recorded > > Should I be worried about this? Or, how do I fix this? Do you get this output only when using pkg_info as a regular user? If so, take a look at the permissions on the directory and files in /var/db/pkg/bsdpan-DBD-mysql-2.9003 et.al. If your umask is set at 077 when installing ports, this directory gets the wrong permission bits set. I get this problem once in a while put it's solved doing: find /var/db/pkg -type f -print0 | xargs -0 chmod 755 find /var/db/pkg -type d -print0 | xargs -0 chmod 644 /sve ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: StarOffice60 port help
On Saturday 22 May 2004 09:11, Hermes Trismegistus wrote: > Is there some documentation for installing port StarOffice60? I have > looked on freebsd.org, dutifully did my google'ing, and read all files in > "/usr/ports/editors/staroffice60". When I run "make" in the port > directory, I just get this stdout: > > ===> staroffice-6.0_2 is an interactive port. > > I have the staroffice install binary, and the tar patch. I just need a bit > of direction. Hopefully, someone can point me in the right direction. I don't use ports to install staroffice. I just use the linux installscript on the CD and install it in /usr/local/staroffice6.0. Then as a user I run /usr/local/startoffice/program/setup and make a local installation. Bjarne ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Help with a routing issue
I have a freebsd 4.7 box at a client. The box has an ip of 192.168.254.22 The default gateway is 192.168.254.1 which is the inside interface of the gateway. The outside interface of the gateway is 196.25.37.18 and it also has an alias of 196.25.37.19. When i ping 196.25.37.18 from the clients box (192.168.254.22) i get this. mmrserver# ping 196.25.37.18 PING 196.25.37.18 (196.25.37.18): 56 data bytes 36 bytes from brandford.trusc.net (192.168.254.24): Redirect Host(New addr: 192.168.254.1) Vr HL TOS Len ID Flg off TTL Pro cks Src Dst 4 5 00 0054 08f4 0 40 01 c9ca 192.168.254.22 196.25.37.18 64 bytes from 196.25.37.18: icmp_seq=0 ttl=63 time=66.616 ms 36 bytes from brandford.trusc.net (192.168.254.24): Redirect Host(New addr: 192.168.254.1) Vr HL TOS Len ID Flg off TTL Pro cks Src Dst 4 5 00 0054 08f8 0 40 01 c9c6 192.168.254.22 196.25.37.18 When i ping 196.25.37.19 i get this. mmrserver# ping 196.25.37.19 PING 196.25.37.19 (196.25.37.19): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 196.25.37.19: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=5.445 ms 64 bytes from 196.25.37.19: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=4.630 ms 64 bytes from 196.25.37.19: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=5.226 ms That is correct the way it should be. My routes on the clients box look as follows: mmrserver# netstat -rn Routing tables Internet: DestinationGatewayFlagsRefs Use Netif Expire default192.168.254.1 UGSc7 1952dc0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 00lo0 192.168.60 link#2 UC 110rl0 192.168.60.1 00:10:dc:f5:9c:9d UHLW0 10rl0972 192.168.60.11 00:0d:61:1b:f0:fc UHLW1 418rl0442 192.168.60.12 00:00:21:e2:8d:e1 UHLW02rl0642 192.168.60.15 00:90:f5:08:32:cb UHLW0 435rl0256 192.168.60.16 00:50:22:8c:ee:51 UHLW01rl0790 192.168.60.18 00:50:bf:97:e8:8a UHLW0 371rl0 1022 192.168.60.21 00:0c:76:25:74:fc UHLW1 1422rl0858 192.168.60.22 00:50:bf:ec:27:a3 UHLW1 10rl0 1032 192.168.60.33 00:0d:61:4d:5b:9e UHLW3 17rl0873 192.168.60.133 00:50:22:8d:ed:86 UHLW1 10rl0 1122 192.168.60.255 ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff UHLWb 2 49rl0 192.168.254link#1 UC 20dc0 192.168.254.1 00:02:6f:32:24:90 UHLW8 268dc0 1149 192.168.254.255ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff UHLWb 2 94dc0 Can anyone help me with why the 196.25.37.18 ip is being redirected via 192.168.254.24? PLEASE ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: mplayer + realaudio ... what to expect when installing ...
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 01:09:14AM -0700, Joe Schmoe wrote: > Hello, > > I have a simple goal - to convert realaudio files I > have saved to my drive into mp3s, on the fbsd command > line. > > The answer, I have been told, is to install mplayer > with realaudio support, and then just: > > mplayer file.ra -ao pcm > > That sounds reasonable. But I have two issues. > > First, I see no mplayer+realaudio in the ports tree - > just mplayer. How do I get realaudio support into > mplayer ? cd /usr/ports/multimedia/mplayer make WITH_REALPLAYER=yes install It is very useful to read the Makefile for a port to find out various options for it. > > Second, just what kind of install is mplayer (and > mplayer + realaudio, for that matter) ?? I want to > keep this system nice and clean - and I will be upset > if mplayer installs a million dependencies, or does > something lame like install X for me, when I don't > want it. So can someone describe just what an mplayer > install is like ... and how to keep it from installing > X, etc., if that is what it does ? mplayer does have about a gazillion dependencies (most of them optional) including X (not optional), so if you don't want X installed then mplayer isn't for you. (It is a multimedia player after all, and to play video you need graphics support.) -- Erik Trulsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Promise ATA100 controller and 160G disks
I have FBSD -STABLE running on a Promise Fasttrak 100 TX2 (latest BIOS) with 2 160GB HDDs as RAID1 and it is running fine. Greetz, Frank > Hi, > > does anyone know if the Promise ATA100 controller PCI card supports 160 G > disks on -STABLE? > > Thanks, > > --Stijn > > -- > Nostalgia ain't what it used to be. > ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
miibus and fxp motherboard devices
Hello, I've got a pentium SBC with three on-board fxp lan devices. In my 4.8 kernel config, I've got device miibus device fxp The dmesg has this to say about the devices: fxp0: port 0xd800-0xd83f mem 0xe500-0xe50f,0xe530-0xe5300fff irq 12 at device 8.0 on pci0 fxp0: Ethernet address 00:30:64:01:86:ff, 10Mbps fxp1: port 0xdc00-0xdc3f mem 0xe510-0xe51f,0xe5302000-0xe5302fff irq 10 at device 9.0 on pci0 fxp1: Ethernet address 00:30:64:01:94:00, 10Mbps fxp2: port 0xe000-0xe03f mem 0xe520-0xe52f,0xe5301000-0xe5301fff irq 11 at device 10.0 on pci0 fxp2: Ethernet address 00:30:64:01:94:01, 10Mbps Specifically, it has nothing to say about the miibus. Compare this to the dmesg on a pentium desktop with a dual-fxp PCI card (and devices miibus and fxp in its config): fxp0: port 0xc000-0xc01f mem 0xdf00-0xdf0f,0xe000-0xefff irq 12 at device 4.0 on pci2 fxp0: Ethernet address 00:03:47:3b:f3:f4 inphy0: on miibus0 inphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto fxp1: port 0xc400-0xc41f mem 0xdf10-0xdf1f,0xe0001000-0xe0001fff irq 10 at device 5.0 on pci2 fxp1: Ethernet address 00:03:47:3b:f3:f5 inphy1: on miibus1 inphy1: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto At the moment, I can not swap the SCB fxp devices out of 10Mb mode and into any of the others that the devices (putatively) support. If I plug the dual-fxp PCI card into the SBC's pci bus, then I get fxp3 and fxp4, each of which are 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX and auto capable. I'd welcome any suggestions about how to enable the additional modes on the motherboard lan parts. Even if it is specific keywords to do a google on (the ones I've chosen insist on showing me other peoples' dmesgs). Am I missing something in my kernel config? rip ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Promise ATA100 controller and 160G disks
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 11:15:02AM +0200, Frank Mueller wrote: > I have FBSD -STABLE running on a Promise Fasttrak 100 TX2 (latest BIOS) with > 2 160GB HDDs as RAID1 and it is running fine. OK, but I have the older non-raid just ATA100 controller version, which is why I suspect it might not work. To be more precies, my cards (I have 3 in the machine) identify as atapci0: port 0x7800-0x783f,0x7400-0x7403,0x7000-0x7007,0x6c00-0x6c03,0x6800-0x6807 mem 0xe100-0xe101 irq 5 at device 8.0 on pci1 atapci1: port 0x8c00-0x8c3f,0x8800-0x8803,0x8400-0x8407,0x8000-0x8003,0x7c00-0x7c07 mem 0xe102-0xe103 irq 10 at device 9.0 on pci1 atapci2: port 0xa000-0xa03f,0x9c00-0x9c03,0x9800-0x9807,0x9400-0x9403,0x9000-0x9007 mem 0xe104-0xe105 irq 11 at device 10.0 on pci1 Unfortunately I don't have any other model numbers right now, but based on the Promise website I think it is an Ultra100 (non-TX2 version). Anyway, I should have done some more research myself before asking this question because the Ultra100 does have support with an updated BIOS (I missed this the first time apparently): http://www.promise.com/support/download/download2_eng.asp?productId=18&category=bios&os=100 Thanks for the response though, it caused me to search the Promise site again :) --Stijn -- Help Wanted: Telepath. You know where to apply. pgp0YLeX4DEn5.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Help with a routing issue
On Wed, 26 May 2004, Leon Botes wrote: > I have a freebsd 4.7 box at a client. > The box has an ip of 192.168.254.22 > The default gateway is 192.168.254.1 which is the inside interface of the > gateway. The outside interface of the gateway is 196.25.37.18 and it also > has an alias of 196.25.37.19. > > When i ping 196.25.37.18 from the clients box (192.168.254.22) i get this. > mmrserver# ping 196.25.37.18 > PING 196.25.37.18 (196.25.37.18): 56 data bytes > 36 bytes from brandford.trusc.net (192.168.254.24): Redirect Host(New addr: > 192.168.254.1) > Vr HL TOS Len ID Flg off TTL Pro cks Src Dst > 4 5 00 0054 08f4 0 40 01 c9ca 192.168.254.22 196.25.37.18 > > 64 bytes from 196.25.37.18: icmp_seq=0 ttl=63 time=66.616 ms > 36 bytes from brandford.trusc.net (192.168.254.24): Redirect Host(New addr: > 192.168.254.1) > Vr HL TOS Len ID Flg off TTL Pro cks Src Dst > 4 5 00 0054 08f8 0 40 01 c9c6 192.168.254.22 196.25.37.18 > > When i ping 196.25.37.19 i get this. > mmrserver# ping 196.25.37.19 > PING 196.25.37.19 (196.25.37.19): 56 data bytes > 64 bytes from 196.25.37.19: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=5.445 ms > 64 bytes from 196.25.37.19: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=4.630 ms > 64 bytes from 196.25.37.19: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=5.226 ms > > That is correct the way it should be. > Could you provide the output of ifconfig -a of the gateway box? Should shed some more light about the issues, also the parts of /etc/rc.conf, where the cards are configured, could be interesting. Olaf -- Olaf Hoyer[EMAIL PROTECTED] Fuerchterliche Erlebniss geben zu raten, ob der, welcher sie erlebt, nicht etwas Fuerchterliches ist. (Nietzsche, Jenseits von Gut und Boese) ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Help with a routing issue
On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 10:55, Leon Botes wrote: > I have a freebsd 4.7 box at a client. > The box has an ip of 192.168.254.22 > The default gateway is 192.168.254.1 which is the inside interface of the > gateway. The outside interface of the gateway is 196.25.37.18 and it also > has an alias of 196.25.37.19. Can you show us the routing on the server please rather than the client ? What is the subnet mask of the alias 196.25.37.19 ? It should have a subnet of 255.255.255.255 as it's on the same network as 196.25.37.18. Your /etc/rc.conf file should look something like this: ifconfig_rl0="inet 196.25.37.18 netmask 255.255.255.0" ifconfig_rl0_alias0="inet 196.25.37.19 netmask 255.255.255.255" Your subnet in the above example may differ according to what block your ISP has provided you. Cheers, -- Nelis Lamprecht PGP: http://www.8ball.co.za/pgpkey/nelis.asc "Unix IS user friendly.. It's just selective about who its friends are." signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
RE: Help with a routing issue
Could you provide the output of ifconfig -a of the gateway box? Should shed some more light about the issues, also the parts of /etc/rc.conf, where the cards are configured, could be interesting. Olaf -- Olaf Hoyer[EMAIL PROTECTED] Fuerchterliche Erlebniss geben zu raten, ob der, welcher sie erlebt, nicht etwas Fuerchterliches ist. (Nietzsche, Jenseits von Gut und Boese) FROM THE GATEWAY: ifconfig fxp0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 inet 196.25.37.18 netmask 0xfff8 broadcast 196.25.37.23 inet 196.25.37.19 netmask 0x broadcast 196.25.37.19 ether 00:20:ed:11:00:e8 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active fxp1: flags=8843 mtu 1500 inet 192.168.254.1 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.254.255 ether 00:20:ed:11:00:e9 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active rc.conf ifconfig_fxp0="inet 196.25.37.18 netmask 255.255.255.248" ifconfig_fxp0_alias0="inet 196.25.37.19 netmask 255.255.255.255" ifconfig_fxp1="inet 192.168.254.1 netmask 255.255.255.0" natd_enable="YES" natd_interface="fxp0" natd_flags="" gateway_enable="YES" defaultrouter="196.25.37.17" Ipfw show 00300 22467 1425741 fwd 196.25.37.20 tcp from any to any 80 out xmit fxp0 01000 64432 13724943 divert 8668 ip from any to any via fxp0 01100 11754 6690334 allow ip from any to any via lo0 01200 00 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 01300 00 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any 01400 5223 533128 fwd 196.25.37.22 tcp from any to any 443 out xmit fxp0 01500 00 fwd 196.25.37.22 tcp from any to any 3306 out xmit fxp0 0160050027082 fwd 196.25.37.22 tcp from any to any 22 out xmit fxp0 01700193 9455 fwd 196.25.37.22 tcp from any to any 110 out xmit fxp0 01800 00 fwd 196.25.37.22 tcp from any to any 119 out xmit fxp0 01900 00 deny log logamount 2 tcp from any to any 445,2556,9996,5554 in recv fxp1 65000 171424 31989301 allow ip from any to any 65535 00 deny ip from any to any FROM THE CLIENT BOX: Ifconfig dc0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 inet 192.168.254.22 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.254.255 ether 00:50:bf:97:e8:83 media: Ethernet autoselect (10baseT/UTP) status: active rl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 inet 192.168.60.2 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.60.255 ether 00:50:bf:43:37:c1 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active rc.conf ifconfig_rl0="inet 192.168.60.2 netmask 255.255.255.0" ifconfig_dc0="inet 192.168.254.22 netmask 255.255.255.0" gateway_enable="YES" defaultrouter="192.168.254.1" nfs_client_enable="YES" firewall_enable="YES" firewall_type="open" natd_enable="YES" natd_interface="dc0" natd_flags="" Ipfw show 00050 8360 3676585 divert 8668 ip from any to any via dc0 00100 00 allow ip from any to any via lo0 00200 00 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 00300 00 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any 65000 44744 16464427 allow ip from any to any 65535 00 deny ip from any to any ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
RE: Help with a routing issue
Can you show us the routing on the server please rather than the client ? What is the subnet mask of the alias 196.25.37.19 ? It should have a subnet of 255.255.255.255 as it's on the same network as 196.25.37.18. Cheers, -- Nelis Lamprecht PGP: http://www.8ball.co.za/pgpkey/nelis.asc "Unix IS user friendly.. It's just selective about who its friends are." The below is only sections of the output. Most of the individual hosts have been removed. Just a few examples left. 10.5/16192.168.254.29 UGSc0 11 fxp1 10.6/16192.168.254.12 UGSc00 fxp1 10.7/16192.168.254.12 UGSc00 fxp1 10.8/16192.168.254.12 UGSc00 fxp1 10.9/16192.168.254.27 UGSc00 fxp1 10.11/16 192.168.254.28 UGSc00 fxp1 10.12/16 192.168.254.33 UGSc00 fxp1 10.13/16 192.168.254.34 UGSc00 fxp1 10.14/16 192.168.252.23 UGSc00 fxp1 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 0 2214lo0 192.168.0 192.168.254.23 UGSc00 fxp1 192.168.2 192.168.254.24 UGSc00 fxp1 192.168.7 192.168.254.31 UGSc00 fxp1 192.168.60 192.168.254.22 UGSc00 fxp1 192.168.252192.168.254.12 UGSc8 161 fxp1 192.168.253192.168.254.12 UGSc 13 212 fxp1 192.168.254link#2 UC 340 fxp1 192.168.254.1 00:20:ed:11:00:e9 UHLW2 1425lo0 192.168.254.22 00:02:6f:32:27:6b UHLW1 1032 fxp1116 192.168.254.23 00:50:bf:97:e4:9d UHLW1 2292 fxp1777 192.168.254.24 00:50:bf:43:2c:16 UHLW3 3476 fxp1421 192.168.254.25 00:a0:cc:db:03:75 UHLW1 836 fxp1 1117 192.168.254.27 00:02:6f:07:86:5b UHLW1 224 fxp1878 192.168.254.28 link#2 UHLW10 fxp1 192.168.254.29 00:02:6f:07:86:57 UHLW1 139 fxp1924 192.168.254.30 00:02:6f:07:86:6a UHLW0 779 fxp1741 192.168.254.31 00:02:6f:08:9f:a6 UHLW1 161 fxp1936 192.168.254.32 00:02:6f:04:7a:1e UHLW0 165 fxp1 59 192.168.254.33 link#2 UHLW1 92 fxp1 192.168.255192.168.254.21 UGSc337107 fxp1 196.25.37.16/29link#1 UC 40 fxp0 196.25.37.17 00:e0:fc:0c:be:d9 UHLW 29 230 fxp0790 196.25.37.18 00:20:ed:11:00:e8 UHLW1 2127lo0 196.25.37.19 00:20:ed:11:00:e8 UHLW1 370lo0 => 196.25.37.19/32link#1 UC 10 fxp0 196.25.37.20 00:0c:f1:ae:c6:99 UHLW144305 fxp0908 196.25.37.22 00:09:5b:3f:2f:63 UHLW111942 fxp0910 ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
RE: Help with a routing issue
On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 12:28, Leon Botes wrote: > The below is only sections of the output. Most of the individual hosts have > been removed. Just a few examples left. > 10.5/16192.168.254.29 UGSc0 11 fxp1 > 10.6/16192.168.254.12 UGSc00 fxp1 > 10.7/16192.168.254.12 UGSc00 fxp1 > 10.8/16192.168.254.12 UGSc00 fxp1 > 10.9/16192.168.254.27 UGSc00 fxp1 > 10.11/16 192.168.254.28 UGSc00 fxp1 > 10.12/16 192.168.254.33 UGSc00 fxp1 > 10.13/16 192.168.254.34 UGSc00 fxp1 > 10.14/16 192.168.252.23 UGSc00 fxp1 > 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 0 2214lo0 > 192.168.0 192.168.254.23 UGSc00 fxp1 > 192.168.2 192.168.254.24 UGSc00 fxp1 > 192.168.7 192.168.254.31 UGSc00 fxp1 > 192.168.60 192.168.254.22 UGSc00 fxp1 > 192.168.252192.168.254.12 UGSc8 161 fxp1 > 192.168.253192.168.254.12 UGSc 13 212 fxp1 > 192.168.254link#2 UC 340 fxp1 > 192.168.254.1 00:20:ed:11:00:e9 UHLW2 1425lo0 > 192.168.254.22 00:02:6f:32:27:6b UHLW1 1032 fxp1116 > 192.168.254.23 00:50:bf:97:e4:9d UHLW1 2292 fxp1777 > 192.168.254.24 00:50:bf:43:2c:16 UHLW3 3476 fxp1421 > 192.168.254.25 00:a0:cc:db:03:75 UHLW1 836 fxp1 1117 > 192.168.254.27 00:02:6f:07:86:5b UHLW1 224 fxp1878 > 192.168.254.28 link#2 UHLW10 fxp1 > 192.168.254.29 00:02:6f:07:86:57 UHLW1 139 fxp1924 > 192.168.254.30 00:02:6f:07:86:6a UHLW0 779 fxp1741 > 192.168.254.31 00:02:6f:08:9f:a6 UHLW1 161 fxp1936 > 192.168.254.32 00:02:6f:04:7a:1e UHLW0 165 fxp1 59 > 192.168.254.33 link#2 UHLW1 92 fxp1 > 192.168.255192.168.254.21 UGSc337107 fxp1 > 196.25.37.16/29link#1 UC 40 fxp0 > 196.25.37.17 00:e0:fc:0c:be:d9 UHLW 29 230 fxp0790 > 196.25.37.18 00:20:ed:11:00:e8 UHLW1 2127lo0 > 196.25.37.19 00:20:ed:11:00:e8 UHLW1 370lo0 => > 196.25.37.19/32link#1 UC 10 fxp0 > 196.25.37.20 00:0c:f1:ae:c6:99 UHLW144305 fxp0908 > 196.25.37.22 00:09:5b:3f:2f:63 UHLW111942 fxp0910 Can't see any peculiarities. Try adding the following route on the client machine: route add -host 196.25.37.18 192.168.254.1 255.255.255.255 See if that helps. -- Nelis Lamprecht PGP: http://www.8ball.co.za/pgpkey/nelis.asc "Unix IS user friendly.. It's just selective about who its friends are." signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
RE: SMTP AUTH
>On Tue, 25 May 2004, Noah wrote: > >> sendmail-8.12.11 >> freeBSD-4.9-STABLE >> >> I must be doing something wrong. SMTP AUTH is not working >very well for me. >> I have been trying to authenticate with user and password to port 25. >> >> I prefer to send all auth user and password information with >SSL encryption. >> would like SSL Version 3 encryption. > >You've got "This server requires a secure connection (SSL)" >enabled for >the SMTP server in Outlook? In my experience (outlook 2000, not tested on outlook express) this won't work. Outlook doesn't seem to understand that "use SSL" means "use STARTLS". What I did was to configure sendmail to also support "smtps" (SSL before SMTP) on the smtps port (465) and point outlook at that port with the "use ssl" checked. > >> I have configured outgoing mail requiring authentication >then clicking both >> with Secure Password Authenticaiton and without. > >That should be "without" for SPA. Agreed, turn off SPA. > -lee ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: `call' function in `make'
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 12:15:57PM +0530, N. Raghavendra wrote: > At 2004-05-25T15:44:51+01:00, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > > > Is there an analogue in BSD `make' of the `call' function in `gmake': > > > $(call VARIABLE,PARAM,PARAM,...)? > > > > Not as such. You can however use the '!=' operator to assign a value > > to a variable based on the output of some external command: > > > > RATIO != sh -c 'echo $$(( $a / $b ))' > > Hi Matthew, > > Thanks for your reply. After writing to the list yesterday, I read > make(1) carefully, and found what I wanted, namely the shell command > for creating `dir1' in this example `Makefile': > > ### Makefile > > ## Create directory FOO if it does not exist. > create_dir = if test ! -d foo ; then rm -f foo ; mkdir foo ; fi > > dir1: src1 > $(create_dir:S/foo/$@/g) > > dir2: src2 > $(create_dir:foo=$@) > > ### Makefile ends here > > However, I don't understand something. The command for `dir1' works > perfectly well: > > % make dir1 > if test ! -d dir1 ; then rm -f dir1 ; mkdir dir1 ; fi > (`dir1' created) > > OTOH, the command for `dir2' does not work --- `make' is not expanding > the local variable `@': > > % make dir2 > if test ! -d $@ ; then rm -f $@ ; mkdir $@ ; fi > (`dir2' not created) > > Can someone tell me why this is happening? Err... because in the second form the result of the substitution is not run through another round of variable expansion, and in the first for it is? You'ld have to ask the original authors of make(1) why they did it that way. Is there something wrong with the first form of the rule that means you can't use it? You have got a line: .PHONY: dir1 dir2 to force those rules to be applied even if dir1 or dir2 are newer than their sources? Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK pgpm30kbde89O.pgp Description: PGP signature
[no subject]
Dear Mr Jerry, Introduce myself, my name is Elin, student from Tokyo Institute of Technology. I have some difficulties in REDHAT and UNIX. I have source code build in UNIX environtment, and I would like to install it in REDHAT. Would you mind telling me what should I edit in 'makefile' file?? Thank you for your atention. Regards, Elin YUSIBANI elin [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
RE: Help with a routing issue
Set it to zero mmrserver# sysctl net | grep direct net.inet.ip.redirect: 0 net.inet.icmp.drop_redirect: 0 net.inet.icmp.log_redirect: 0 Results are the same. Also tried adding a fixed route as such: Route add -host 196.25.37.18 192.168.254.1 No luck. -Original Message- From: Nelis Lamprecht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 26 May 2004 13:55 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Help with a routing issue One other thing you can try. There is a sysctl variable net.inet.ip.redirect: 1 Try turning that off by setting it to 0 on the client machine. What happens ? Nelis On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 13:08, Leon Botes wrote: > Tried that already - no luck. > > -Original Message- > From: Nelis Lamprecht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 26 May 2004 13:01 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Help with a routing issue > > On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 12:28, Leon Botes wrote: > > > The below is only sections of the output. Most of the individual > > hosts have been removed. Just a few examples left. > > 10.5/16192.168.254.29 UGSc0 11 fxp1 > > 10.6/16192.168.254.12 UGSc00 fxp1 > > 10.7/16192.168.254.12 UGSc00 fxp1 > > 10.8/16192.168.254.12 UGSc00 fxp1 > > 10.9/16192.168.254.27 UGSc00 fxp1 > > 10.11/16 192.168.254.28 UGSc00 fxp1 > > 10.12/16 192.168.254.33 UGSc00 fxp1 > > 10.13/16 192.168.254.34 UGSc00 fxp1 > > 10.14/16 192.168.252.23 UGSc00 fxp1 > > 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 0 2214lo0 > > 192.168.0 192.168.254.23 UGSc00 fxp1 > > 192.168.2 192.168.254.24 UGSc00 fxp1 > > 192.168.7 192.168.254.31 UGSc00 fxp1 > > 192.168.60 192.168.254.22 UGSc00 fxp1 > > 192.168.252192.168.254.12 UGSc8 161 fxp1 > > 192.168.253192.168.254.12 UGSc 13 212 fxp1 > > 192.168.254link#2 UC 340 fxp1 > > 192.168.254.1 00:20:ed:11:00:e9 UHLW2 1425lo0 > > 192.168.254.22 00:02:6f:32:27:6b UHLW1 1032 fxp1 116 > > 192.168.254.23 00:50:bf:97:e4:9d UHLW1 2292 fxp1 777 > > 192.168.254.24 00:50:bf:43:2c:16 UHLW3 3476 fxp1 421 > > 192.168.254.25 00:a0:cc:db:03:75 UHLW1 836 fxp1 1117 > > 192.168.254.27 00:02:6f:07:86:5b UHLW1 224 fxp1 878 > > 192.168.254.28 link#2 UHLW10 fxp1 > > 192.168.254.29 00:02:6f:07:86:57 UHLW1 139 fxp1 924 > > 192.168.254.30 00:02:6f:07:86:6a UHLW0 779 fxp1 741 > > 192.168.254.31 00:02:6f:08:9f:a6 UHLW1 161 fxp1 936 > > 192.168.254.32 00:02:6f:04:7a:1e UHLW0 165 fxp1 59 > > 192.168.254.33 link#2 UHLW1 92 fxp1 > > 192.168.255192.168.254.21 UGSc337107 fxp1 > > 196.25.37.16/29link#1 UC 40 fxp0 > > 196.25.37.17 00:e0:fc:0c:be:d9 UHLW 29 230 fxp0 790 > > 196.25.37.18 00:20:ed:11:00:e8 UHLW1 2127lo0 > > 196.25.37.19 00:20:ed:11:00:e8 UHLW1 370lo0 => > > 196.25.37.19/32link#1 UC 10 fxp0 > > 196.25.37.20 00:0c:f1:ae:c6:99 UHLW144305 fxp0 908 > > 196.25.37.22 00:09:5b:3f:2f:63 UHLW111942 fxp0 910 > > Can't see any peculiarities. Try adding the following route on the > client > machine: > > route add -host 196.25.37.18 192.168.254.1 255.255.255.255 > > See if that helps. > > -- > Nelis Lamprecht > PGP: http://www.8ball.co.za/pgpkey/nelis.asc > "Unix IS user friendly.. It's just selective about who its friends are." -- Nelis Lamprecht PGP: http://www.8ball.co.za/pgpkey/nelis.asc "Unix IS user friendly.. It's just selective about who its friends are." ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: `call' function in `make'
At 2004-05-26T12:41:57+01:00, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 12:15:57PM +0530, N. Raghavendra wrote: > > ### Makefile > > > > ## Create directory FOO if it does not exist. > > create_dir = if test ! -d foo ; then rm -f foo ; mkdir foo ; fi > > > > dir1: src1 > > $(create_dir:S/foo/$@/g) > > > > dir2: src2 > > $(create_dir:foo=$@) > > > > ### Makefile ends here > > Is there something wrong with the first form of the rule that means > you can't use it? Hi Matthew, Thanks for the help. I would have liked to use the second substitution mechanism (foo=$@) because it is part of the POSIX specification of `make' (http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/make.html), whereas the first form (S/foo/$@/g) doesn't seem to be so. > You have got a line: > > .PHONY: dir1 dir2 > > to force those rules to be applied even if dir1 or dir2 are newer than > their sources? Yes, I had tried that too, but it doesn't make the second rule work. The second rule does work with `gmake'. Cheers, Raghavendra. -- N. Raghavendra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | See mail headers for contact Harish-Chandra Research Institute | and OpenPGP details. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Promise ATA100 controller and 160G disks
It shouldn't be an problem as long as you upgrade the BIOS in the atacontroller. I'm using an Promise Fasttrak 100 (without TX2) on two 200Gb drives. With the newest bios the controller can use drives over 120GB. Heikki Soerum, Norway. On Wed, 26 May 2004 11:53:24 +0200 Stijn Hoop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 11:15:02AM +0200, Frank Mueller wrote: >> I have FBSD -STABLE running on a Promise Fasttrak 100 TX2 (latest >BIOS) with> 2 160GB HDDs as RAID1 and it is running fine. > >OK, but I have the older non-raid just ATA100 controller version, which >is why I suspect it might not work. > >To be more precies, my cards (I have 3 in the machine) identify as > >atapci0: port >0x7800-0x783f,0x7400-0x7403,0x7000-0x7007,0x6c00-0x6c03,0x6800-0x6807 >mem 0xe100-0xe101 irq 5 at device 8.0 on pci1 atapci1: ATA100 controller> port >0x8c00-0x8c3f,0x8800-0x8803,0x8400-0x8407,0x8000-0x8003,0x7c00-0x7c07 >mem 0xe102-0xe103 irq 10 at device 9.0 on pci1 atapci2: > port >0xa000-0xa03f,0x9c00-0x9c03,0x9800-0x9807,0x9400-0x9403,0x9000-0x9007 >mem 0xe104-0xe105 irq 11 at device 10.0 on pci1 > >Unfortunately I don't have any other model numbers right now, but based >on the Promise website I think it is an Ultra100 (non-TX2 version). > >Anyway, I should have done some more research myself before asking this >question because the Ultra100 does have support with an updated BIOS (I >missed this the first time apparently): > >http://www.promise.com/support/download/download2_eng.asp?productId=18 >&category=bios&os=100 > >Thanks for the response though, it caused me to search the Promise site >again :) > >--Stijn > >-- >Help Wanted: Telepath. You know where to apply. > -- "Throughout history it has been the inaction of those who could have acted, the indifference of those who should have known better, the silence of the voice of justice when it mattered most, that has made it possible for evil to triumph." - Haile Selassie ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
RE: SMTP AUTH
I have configured both sendmail and cyrus to use SSL (Not SPA) with SMTP auth on FreeBSD with Outlook clients. Can't remember the name of the application but it was something like "stunnel" or similar. Basically I kept sendmail and cyrus as is and used this application to listen on the SSL ports. It just accepted the SSL connection and passed the data off to the either sendmail and cyrus. The client had to install a certificate that was signed and generated in house. Very straight forward (if I could remember the name of it)... Sincerely, Robert T. Covell President / Owner Rolet Internet Services, LLC Web: www.rolet.com Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: 816.471.1095 Fax: 816.471.3447 24x7: 816.210.7145 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Lee Dilkie > Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 6:22 AM > To: 'Richard Stevenson'; 'Noah' > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: SMTP AUTH > > > >On Tue, 25 May 2004, Noah wrote: > > > >> sendmail-8.12.11 > >> freeBSD-4.9-STABLE > >> > >> I must be doing something wrong. SMTP AUTH is not working > >very well for me. > >> I have been trying to authenticate with user and password to port 25. > >> > >> I prefer to send all auth user and password information with > >SSL encryption. > >> would like SSL Version 3 encryption. > > > >You've got "This server requires a secure connection (SSL)" > >enabled for > >the SMTP server in Outlook? > > In my experience (outlook 2000, not tested on outlook express) > this won't work. Outlook doesn't seem to understand that "use > SSL" means "use STARTLS". What I did was to configure sendmail to > also support "smtps" (SSL before SMTP) on the smtps port (465) > and point outlook at that port with the "use ssl" checked. > > > > >> I have configured outgoing mail requiring authentication > >then clicking both > >> with Secure Password Authenticaiton and without. > > > >That should be "without" for SPA. > > Agreed, turn off SPA. > > > > > -lee > > ___ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Repeated connections to port 25 with firewall
: When local processes want to mail, they fork n exec a sendmail binary : themselves. : : You shouldn't need a sendmail server running for that. Here is what I have/had in rc.conf #sendmail_enable="no" #sendmail_submit_enable="no" #sendmail_outbound_enable="no" #sendmail_msp_queue_enable="no" And as soon as I restarted after commenting out these lines, root's mailbox got filled with megs of mail from cron. I want the minimum I need to get system mail without leaving an instance of sendmail vulnerable to attack or eating up resources. p.s. What mail reader is good for root mail? Is there anything better at managing system mail than mutt? jm -- My other computer is your Windows box. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re:
On Wed, 26 May 2004 20:54:49 +0900 YUSIBANI elin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: hi, > I have some difficulties in REDHAT and UNIX. > I have source code build in UNIX environtment, and I would like to > install it in REDHAT. Would you mind telling me what should I edit in > 'makefile' file?? > this is a FreeBSD-mailinglist, FreeBSD != Linux try : http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Promise ATA100 controller and 160G disks
Stijn Hoop wrote: Hi, does anyone know if the Promise ATA100 controller PCI card supports 160 G disks on -STABLE? I'm not 100% sure that the Promise controller is the problem here: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2004-May/046070.html Earlier this week, I thought I'd solved the problem: I partitioned the drive in a different computer, and it seemed to be OK in one of the machines where it previously wouldn't work. I then partitioned a second drive and sent them both off with the client to be installed in the server at the colo site. Apon installation, the system hung (as described in the email) ... I don't know what the hell is going on at this point, and it's incredibly frustrating because I'm not even sure how to proceed with fixing it. I guess my point is that it might be worthwhile to try to isolate whether the problem is with the Promise controller, or with 160G drives. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
PPPD connection
Hi, I can't establish connection with my ISP using pppd. I attached several files: dir - /etc/ppp/ directory layout system - output of uname -a chap-secrets | chat.vmtc | -> config files for pppd options.vmtc | I start pppd as root 'pppd file /etc/options/options.vmtc'. Then it connects to modem, dial out the number, makes connection to a peer and then after half a minute or so closes connection. There is no log information in the /var/log/ppp.log (there is a reference to ppp in a /etc/syslog.conf). So I do not know what's going on and why the connection is broken. I checked login and password in chap-secrets file - these are correct. What do I do wrong? Maxim # Dialout format: # AFFV01586 * xx ABORT ERROR ABORT 'NO DIALTONE' TIMEOUT 2 OK-''-'' ATZ OK-+++ATHZ-OK ATDP408200 ABORT 'BUSY' TIMEOUT 70 CONNECT "" total 12 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 May 26 22:01 . drwxr-xr-x 16 root wheel 2048 May 23 00:00 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel84 May 25 22:27 chap-secrets -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 115 May 26 21:45 chat.vmtc -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 157 May 26 21:45 options.vmtc -rw--- 1 root wheel 1169 Oct 9 2002 ppp.conf /dev/cuaa1 115200 modem crtscts asyncmap 0 debug connect '/usr/bin/chat -v -f /etc/ppp/chat.vmtc' defaultroute noipdefault persist holdoff 2 mtu 250 mru 250 FreeBSD router 4.7-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE #1: Tue May 25 21:47:44 GMT 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/compile/ROUTER i386 ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
[no subject]
subscription ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Promise ATA100 controller and 160G disks
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 09:28:09AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote: > Stijn Hoop wrote: > > does anyone know if the Promise ATA100 controller PCI card supports 160 G > > disks on -STABLE? > > I'm not 100% sure that the Promise controller is the problem here: > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2004-May/046070.html Hmm, not good. However, I have misworded my question I guess -- I wanted to know whether those drives _could_ work in that configuration; I did not want to buy non-working drives (I'd have gone for 120G if they didn't work, however I'm reasonably sure now that it'll work). Based on your problems I'll stay away from buying a Samsung drive right now, even though it might not be the real problem. Thanks for the feedback. > Earlier this week, I thought I'd solved the problem: I partitioned the drive > in a different computer, and it seemed to be OK in one of the machines where > it previously wouldn't work. > > I then partitioned a second drive and sent them both off with the client to > be installed in the server at the colo site. Apon installation, the system > hung (as described in the email) ... I don't know what the hell is going on > at this point, and it's incredibly frustrating because I'm not even sure how > to proceed with fixing it. We had a Linux machine here a few weeks ago that wouldn't boot; turned out the memory had gone faulty but we only discovered that after running memtest86 for over 24 hours (having passed lots of tests it suddenly reported failures). It wasn't a case of overheating because it consistently failed to boot; it just took memtest lots and lots of repeats to get the problem to show. Anyway I don't know if it's related to your problem but my point is that you never suspect the right component in the case of hardware failures :( --Stijn -- Nostalgia ain't what it used to be. pgpYsx53jXC99.pgp Description: PGP signature
File encryption: bdes or gpg
Dear all, I am fairly new to FreeBSD and this is my first post to freebsd-questions. I hope I am asking my question in the correct forum. Apologies if not. I am hoping someone can give me advice on file encryption. I would like to encrypt a file and store it on my filesystem. I would like to encrypt the file so that my data is not readable by someone who gains root access or physical access to my computer. I do not intend to share the data with anyone else so a public/private key system is optional. I did some Googling and some reading of man pages and I have come up with 3 options thus far: 1. bdes(1) 2. gpg -c (/usr/ports/security/gnupg) 3. gpg (/usr/ports/security/gnupg) with a public/private key pair for me plus a passphrase I would really appreciate any pointers to discussions of the relative merits of these approaches or pointers to better options if available. Thank you all very much for your time. Best wishes, Simon ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Problem with xscreensaver-gnome port
I recently tried to update my xscreensaver-gnome port from 4.15_2 to 4.16. After the usual amount of churning, it died with the following error: --- In file included from phosphor.c:34: /usr/local/include/util.h:95: error: syntax error before '/' token In file included from phosphor.c:34: /usr/local/include/util.h:21:1: unterminated #ifndef phosphor.c:33:1: unterminated #ifdef phosphor.c:29:1: unterminated #ifdef gmake[1]: *** [phosphor.o] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/x11/xscreensaver-gnome/work/xscreensaver-4.16/hacks' gmake: *** [all] Error 5 *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/xscreensaver-gnome. --- Then I got a notice about the upgrade dying with a C++ error, which for some reason I didn't save. Any ideas? I couldn't find anything in a quick search, and it's holding up the builds of other Gnome ports. I'm using FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT, but I'd think that an error like this is one that would be likely to show up pretty readily. Jesse Sheidlower ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Running FreeBSD 4.9 Jails on a FreeBSD 5.2.1 system
At 2004-05-25T20:38:50Z, "Kung Foo Ham[p]?ster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > When I install FreeBSD 5 on my system can I run those FreeBSD 4 Jails on > it and then upgrade them individually without much pressure. Not very likely, unfortunately. The ties between userspace and the kernel are pretty tight on FreeBSD systems. Side note: I've built Linux-native jails, starting with extracting a Gentoo "stage 1" tarball into an empty directory. It's kind of nice to be able to offer support virtual Linux systems that are 99% compatible with the real thing. -- Kirk Strauser "94 outdated ports on the box, 94 outdated ports. Portupgrade one, an hour 'til done, 82 outdated ports on the box." pgpOU5EpF8rar.pgp Description: PGP signature
patch
Hi, I have a source ( in fact it's many sources) divided in many directories; and I have to patch it with a diff file. But when I perform the patch command, the computers wants to know which file I want to patch; but there are a lot of sources, and many of them have to be patched. So is there any option which can specify that all sources must be modified ? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Odd one: my root account disappears into hyperspace.
Here's a really odd one. I ssh into my server as myself, and then su to root. At which point something odd happens: a) the output of some shell commands seems to be redirected somewhere other then my xterm; b) when I try to run emacs or vi, I get: "emacs: standard input is not a tty" This doesn't happen when I log in as another user and try it. I've tried comparing the contents of our two home directories, and there appears no difference. Anyone seen this before? --- Andy Holyer, Technical stuff Hedgehog Broadband, 11 Marlborough Place Brighton BN1 1UB 08451 260895 x 241 ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Promise ATA100 controller and 160G disks
Stijn Hoop wrote: On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 09:28:09AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote: Stijn Hoop wrote: does anyone know if the Promise ATA100 controller PCI card supports 160 G disks on -STABLE? I'm not 100% sure that the Promise controller is the problem here: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2004-May/046070.html Hmm, not good. However, I have misworded my question I guess -- I wanted to know whether those drives _could_ work in that configuration; I did not want to buy non-working drives (I'd have gone for 120G if they didn't work, however I'm reasonably sure now that it'll work). Based on your problems I'll stay away from buying a Samsung drive right now, even though it might not be the real problem. Thanks for the feedback. Don't know if that's the problem or not, but I guess it's as good as I can do with advice right now. I'm pretty damn frustrated with the current problem, myself. Earlier this week, I thought I'd solved the problem: I partitioned the drive in a different computer, and it seemed to be OK in one of the machines where it previously wouldn't work. I then partitioned a second drive and sent them both off with the client to be installed in the server at the colo site. Apon installation, the system hung (as described in the email) ... I don't know what the hell is going on at this point, and it's incredibly frustrating because I'm not even sure how to proceed with fixing it. We had a Linux machine here a few weeks ago that wouldn't boot; turned out the memory had gone faulty but we only discovered that after running memtest86 for over 24 hours (having passed lots of tests it suddenly reported failures). It wasn't a case of overheating because it consistently failed to boot; it just took memtest lots and lots of repeats to get the problem to show. Anyway I don't know if it's related to your problem but my point is that you never suspect the right component in the case of hardware failures :( Good point. If I were fixing the correct problem, it still wouldn't be a problem. I still think it's related to the HDDs though, as the machine had 60+ days uptime without the drives, then wouldn't boot with them, and is now back up and running without them. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Repeated connections to port 25 with firewall
On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 14:27, Jonathon McKitrick wrote: > : When local processes want to mail, they fork n exec a sendmail binary > : themselves. > : > : You shouldn't need a sendmail server running for that. > > Here is what I have/had in rc.conf > > #sendmail_enable="no" > #sendmail_submit_enable="no" > #sendmail_outbound_enable="no" > #sendmail_msp_queue_enable="no" > > And as soon as I restarted after commenting out these lines, root's mailbox > got filled with megs of mail from cron. I want the minimum I need to get > system mail without leaving an instance of sendmail vulnerable to attack or > eating up resources. > You can replace all of the above with sendmail_enable="NONE" Not sure if it has already been pointed out to you but you can change the behaviour of periodic jobs on your system. By default all the jobs are mailed to root but you can have those jobs logged to a file instead. Simply copy the periodic.conf file from /etc/defaults to /etc and change it to your liking eg. instead of having daily_output="root" which sends a mail to root you can have it log to a file daily_output="/var/log/daily.log" Same apply's for weekly and monthly jobs. Personally I find it annoying when it sends out a mail for each job so I change it to log to a file instead which I can check periodically ( excuse the pun ;) As a side note if you don't want your cron jobs to output anything add a > /dev/null 2>&1 at the end of them. Cheers, -- Nelis Lamprecht PGP: http://www.8ball.co.za/pgpkey/nelis.asc "Unix IS user friendly.. It's just selective about who its friends are." signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
boot0cfg
Hi, I'm sure this has been asked before, but I cant find any good info. I'm having problems reinstalling the bootloader, i'm running 5.2.1, I made it to the fixit console but when i type boot0cfg -d da0, i get: I/O error. Any Ideas? Br, Joe __ Do you Yahoo!? Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger. http://messenger.yahoo.com/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Help with a routing issue
On Wednesday 26 May 2004 18:25, Leon Botes wrote: > I have a freebsd 4.7 box at a client. > The box has an ip of 192.168.254.22 > The default gateway is 192.168.254.1 which is the inside interface of the > gateway. The outside interface of the gateway is 196.25.37.18 and it also > has an alias of 196.25.37.19. > > When i ping 196.25.37.18 from the clients box (192.168.254.22) i get this. > mmrserver# ping 196.25.37.18 > PING 196.25.37.18 (196.25.37.18): 56 data bytes > 36 bytes from brandford.trusc.net (192.168.254.24): Redirect Host(New addr: > 192.168.254.1) I don't know whether it has any relevance to your problem; but I find the symbolic address 'brandford.trusc.net' is being reported on the public network: beta:209> host brandford.trusc.net brandford.trusc.net has address 192.168.254.24 Which I don't believe should be the case. A misconfigured DNS ? Malcolm ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Repeated connections to port 25 with firewall
On Wed, 26 May 2004 13:27:07 +0100 Jonathon McKitrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > : When local processes want to mail, they fork n exec a sendmail binary > : themselves. > : > : You shouldn't need a sendmail server running for that. > > Here is what I have/had in rc.conf > > #sendmail_enable="no" > #sendmail_submit_enable="no" > #sendmail_outbound_enable="no" > #sendmail_msp_queue_enable="no" > > And as soon as I restarted after commenting out these lines, root's mailbox > got filled with megs of mail from cron. I want the minimum I need to get > system mail without leaving an instance of sendmail vulnerable to attack or > eating up resources. This archive post may help you: http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031220102637.GB6942 Another document that may be of interest is /etc/mail/README > p.s. What mail reader is good for root mail? Is there anything better at > managing system mail than mutt? You can use any mail client. You can also read root's mail as any user by adding an entry to /etc/aliases, for example: # Pretty much everything else in this file points to "root", so # you would do well in either reading root's mailbox or forwarding # root's email from here. # root: [EMAIL PROTECTED] root: joeuser All the mail that would have went to root will be forwarded to "joeuser". HTH, Randy -- ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: which kinds of AMD work withh FBSD?
On this server (i815), the video uses the system SDRAM and since I'm not a gamer whatever chip-set this has is adequate. Anyboy know what kind of on-board video comes with the AMD mobo's? (Am I going to be pulling my hair trying to get it working? in other words.) gary Intel chipset boards for pentiums almost always use an intel graphics chipset. On amd based boards, it varies greatly what you get. I would assume an nforce chipset with onboard would probably use a nvidia chipsest. Via and sis boards are bound to have different video chipsets. Short answer: it depends on the motherboard. I bought an asus board without onboard video for this reason and got a lowend nvidia agp card to throw in since i knew it was supported by nvidia's drivers. (nforce 2 motherboard chipset) That worked out rather nicely. One other thing to consider is online shopping. My local computer store has a barebones for $250 but i can build the same system using newegg.com for $200 with better parts. (i.e. asus board, name brand ram, etc) I saw a case on there for 25 bucks the other day. Locally the cheapest cases are 45 (both with power supply). I'm sure there are other sites too. Lucas Holt [EMAIL PROTECTED] FoolishGames.com (Jewel Fan Site) JustJournal.com (Free blogging) 'Mmm... forbidden donut' -- Homer Jay Simpson ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
cvs export -P?
Hi there, I wish to know how to export from cvs and prune empty directories. I know a co can be done and pruned by: cvs co -rSOMETAG -P module but: cvs export -rSOMETAG -P module only show me the usage help even though I have read in may places that -P does infact apply with export too. Thanks! ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: File encryption: bdes or gpg
> I am hoping someone can give me advice on file encryption. I would like > to encrypt a file and store it on my filesystem. I would like to encrypt > the file so that my data is not readable by someone who gains root > access or physical access to my computer. I do not intend to share the > data with anyone else so a public/private key system is optional. > > I did some Googling and some reading of man pages and I have come up > with 3 options thus far: > > 1. bdes(1) > > 2. gpg -c (/usr/ports/security/gnupg) > > 3. gpg (/usr/ports/security/gnupg) with a public/private key pair for me > plus a passphrase 4. gbde (on FreeBSD >= 5.X) encrypts a whole filesystem. It is much easier to use than utilities that encrypt single files. 5. bdes/idea/gpg/... on top of gbde (storing an encrypted file on an encrypted filesystem). IMHO, it's not really the encryption algorithm that is the weak link, but: a. tempfiles (or shreds of temp files) that are not physically overwritten (including swap memory), b. poor passphrases (too short or not random enough) c. human error. Many programs write to temporary files (including buffers), before writing the final versions out to disk. If you use encrypted filesystems (like gbde) everywhere a tempfile is likely to be dropped (don't forget [/var]/tmp and swap), your data would be much safer. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Serial Console problem
I've just tried connect to my fbsd box with serial cable (serial console), it works fine but I get always after some time this : > May 26 17:12:47 monty getty[585]: login_tty /dev/console: >Inappropriate ioctl for device >May 26 17:12:47 monty getty[587]: login_tty /dev/console: Inappropriate >ioctl for device >May 26 17:12:47 monty init: getty repeating too quickly on port >/dev/console, sleeping 30 secs >May 26 17:12:47 monty getty[589]: login_tty /dev/console: Inappropriate >ioctl for device I can work with serial console, but these messages are anoying. Any suggestion how to get rid od them ? Some info : -- System is FreeBSD 5.2.1 kernel with "options CONSPEED=115200" -- /etc/make.conf (bootblocks recompiled) BOOT_COMCONSOLE_PORT=0x3F8 BOOT_COMCONSOLE_SPEED=115200" -- /etc/ttys ttyd0 "/usr/libexec/getty std.115200" vt100 on secure -- dmesg ... sio0 port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A, console ... -- Thanks, P.D. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
FreeBSD
Здравствуйте! Я вот недавно купил установочный диск с FreeBSD 5.2, и не смог его поставить.Напишите мне пожалуйста документацию по пошаговой установке FreeBSD 5.2. Заранее спасибо! -- С уважением, Fox-Russia mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Strange pkg_info output
At 5:41 PM -0400 5/25/04, Chuck Swiger wrote: Garance A Drosihn wrote: At 4:49 PM -0400 5/25/04, Chuck Swiger wrote: If you install perl from ports, you apparently get bsdpan included. Hmm. How would I know if I had it? I don't seem to have any port with the letters 'pan' in it. and `locate bsdpan' does not find anything. I guess I don't really know what I should be looking for... How about this: 22-sec% cat /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8/distinfo MD5 (perl-5.8.2.tar.gz) = fa356b74f99166b63a68a322c3c68f91 SIZE (perl-5.8.2.tar.gz) = 11896287 MD5 (BSDPAN-5.8.0_1.tar.gz) = af9f075e073b14714cfeb8a7582013e7 SIZE (BSDPAN-5.8.0_1.tar.gz) = 6338 ...? :-) Ugh. When I tried grepping /var/db/pkg/*/*, I only looked for a lowercase 'bsdpan'. Yes, I do have it installed. thanks. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn= [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior Systems Programmer or [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rensselaer Polytechnic Instituteor [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
fputs
I am trying to port software currently running on hp-ux to freeBSD 4.9.
In the code the software use fputs to output chars to the terminal.
What seems to be happening is these are all buffered until the process
terminates and then they all come out rather than being sent to the terminal
during the program operation. Do I need to change an environment setting ??
Should I swap to printf ?? What is the syntax ??
Regards
Richard
term = (char *) getenv("TERM");
if (strcmp(term, "wy50") == 0 || strcmp(term, "wy60") == 0)
{fputs ("\033z(", stdout);
if (argc == 1) {
fputs (trmess, stdout);
if (strlen(trmess) != 78)
fputs ("\015", stdout);
}
else {
strcpy (trmess, argv[1]);
fputs (argv[1], stdout);
if (strlen(trmess) != 78)
fputs ("\015", stdout);
}
}
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
FreeBSD to Windows No Reboot
Is there a way I can go from FreeBSD to windows without rebooting? Also if I have an active serial line sl0, can i run hyper terminal in windows with that same line? And lastly, is there a hyperterminal program in FreeBSD and do i have to turn off the SLIP sl0 for it to run properly? Basically I have a PIC 16F819, it will respond to a character and display an array. Im trying to collect the packet that is sent for an HTML request and display what the PIC itself received. I have already seen the tcpdump/tcpshow packets. This will help me decode the TCP and my C++ code in my PIC. Thanks in advance. Bryan Maxwell - Do you Yahoo!? Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
tinydns +MX
Greetings, I have djbdns installed and working. I have been using DNS on my LAN and having it resolve the names for my local machines. It forwards any unresolved to my ISP's dns server. Recently, I have installed qmail on my LAN for internal email. I used the ./add-mx to add a mx record for my machine which is running qmail. the mx record in the data file looks like: @osborneindustries.com:192.168.1.89:a::86400 If I send test mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], it gets forwarded to my ISP's email server. If I send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (name of my qmail server), it gets delivered just fine. How do I get my mx record setup so that [EMAIL PROTECTED] gets delivered to mail.osborneindustries.com ? here are a couple of tests that I ran: mail# host -t mx osborneindustries.com 192.168.1.1 Using domain server 192.168.1.1: osborneindustries.com mail is handled (pri=0) by a.mx.osborneindustries.com mail# host a.mx.osborneindustries.com 192.168.1.1 Using domain server 192.168.1.1: a.mx.osborneindustries.com has address 192.168.1.89 thanks in advance, Darryl ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD
Hey Fox Fox wrote: Здравствуйте! Я вот недавно купил установочный диск с FreeBSD 5.2, и не смог его поставить.Напишите мне пожалуйста документацию по пошаговой установке FreeBSD 5.2. Заранее спасибо! The language used on this list is English, Could you please ask the question in English? Thanks in advance (and for your advance 2 ;)) -- Kind regards, Remko Lodder Elvandar.org/DSINet.org www.mostly-harmless.nl Dutch community for helping newcomers on the hackerscene ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: patch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a source ( in fact it's many sources) divided in many directories; and I have to patch it with a diff file. But when I perform the patch command, the computers wants to know which file I want to patch; but there are a lot of sources, and many of them have to be patched. So is there any option which can specify that all sources must be modified ? If you create the diff recursively (the -r option), it will record the directory structure so that patch knows how to find each of the changed files. Create the diff from the same relative position as the patch command will run and you should be fine, otherwise consider the -d and -p options to patch... -- -Chuck ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: fputs
In the last episode (May 26), Richard Burnett-Godfree said:
> I am trying to port software currently running on hp-ux to freeBSD
> 4.9.
>
> In the code the software use fputs to output chars to the terminal.
>
> What seems to be happening is these are all buffered until the
> process terminates and then they all come out rather than being sent
> to the terminal during the program operation. Do I need to change an
> environment setting ?? Should I swap to printf ?? What is the syntax
> ??
>
> Regards
> Richard
>
> if (strcmp(term, "wy50") == 0 || strcmp(term, "wy60") == 0)
>{fputs ("\033z(", stdout);
...
>}
Try adding an fflush(stdout) at the end of that code block.
--
Dan Nelson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: fputs
Richard Burnett-Godfree wrote: In the code the software use fputs to output chars to the terminal. What seems to be happening is these are all buffered until the process terminates and then they all come out rather than being sent to the terminal during the program operation. Do I need to change an environment setting ?? Should I swap to printf ?? What is the syntax ?? You ought to add a fflush(stdout) to the code when and where you want to be sure that the output buffer is written... -- -Chuck ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: tinydns +MX
Darryl Hoar wrote: Greetings, I have djbdns installed and working. I have been using DNS on my LAN and having it resolve the names for my local machines. It forwards any unresolved to my ISP's dns server. Recently, I have installed qmail on my LAN for internal email. I used the ./add-mx to add a mx record for my machine which is running qmail. the mx record in the data file looks like: @osborneindustries.com:192.168.1.89:a::86400 If I send test mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], it gets forwarded to my ISP's email server. If I send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (name of my qmail server), it gets delivered just fine. How do I get my mx record setup so that [EMAIL PROTECTED] gets delivered to mail.osborneindustries.com ? here are a couple of tests that I ran: mail# host -t mx osborneindustries.com 192.168.1.1 Using domain server 192.168.1.1: osborneindustries.com mail is handled (pri=0) by a.mx.osborneindustries.com mail# host a.mx.osborneindustries.com 192.168.1.1 Using domain server 192.168.1.1: a.mx.osborneindustries.com has address 192.168.1.89 qmail is getting it's DNS information from somewhere other than 192.168.1.1 Log into that machine and do "host -t mx osborneindustries.com" and see what DNS server it's using. Perhaps you can adjust /etc/resolv.conf on the mail server. mail.osborneindustries.com works because there is no MX for that domain, so qmail sends it directly to the host instead. I'll be willing to bet that the correct IP for that hostname is in /etc/hosts, thus it sends to where you'd expect. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: mplayer + realaudio ... what to expect when installing ...
Erik Trulsson wrote: mplayer does have about a gazillion dependencies (most of them optional) including X (not optional), so if you don't want X installed then mplayer isn't for you. (It is a multimedia player after all, and to play video you need graphics support.) Actually, you can pass make WITHOUT_GUI=yes and it will not install X. Yes, it does display videos on the command line. No, it's not pretty. Anyway, for just converting RealAudio into MP3, it should do the job nicely. -Henrik W Lund ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: ethernet card not coming up on reboot
Subject: Re: ethernet card not coming up on reboot > > On Tue, 25 May 2004 20:00:12 -1000 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake thus: > > > Aloha Eric and Luke > > > > I am aware that sysinstall will append to rc.conf. > > I went ahead and deleted all of the appends and rebooted. > > The ethernet did not come up on reboot. I had to use > > sysinstall to get an ip. And yes, it did append to > > rc.conf again. > > > > I will look into setting a static ip but I would like > > to know why this is happening. I have 3 other boxes > > that have FreeBSD on them and they don't have this problem. > > > > Robert > > > > - Original Message - On Tuesday, May 25, 2004 8:15 pm Luke Kearney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When you used /stand/sysinstall again did you reboot to get the IP or > did you bring up the interface by hand? I am wondering if having only > one config line in rc.conf gives you no IP upon boot whether or not > having booted and go no address can you get one by using netstart > or not? > eg > > #sh /etc/netstart > > This should re-read your rc.conf file and execute the network related > cmds. After "sh /etc/netstart" I get : hw.bus.devctl_disable: 1-> 1 (then the lo0 printou) dhclient already running? (pid-221) and ifconfig -a unchanged. have to use sysinsstall. > > One more shot in the dark and believe me this is a shot in the > dark, try > changing the line in rc.conf to ifconfig_sk0="UP" and then through > rc.local run dhclient as a separate script. The net effect being that > you start the interface before trying to get an IP as a separate > process. I tried this but it didn't change anything...if I did it right? I edited rc.conf and changed the line [ifconfig_sk0="DHCP"] to [ifconfig_sk0="UP"] and created /usr/local/etc/rc.d/rc.local to read ifconfig_sk0="DHCP" When I did this I could never i initialize DHCP. Even sysinstall failed. as a side note, during boot, the sequence delays for over a minute during starting DHClient. It can't initialize sk0 but sysinstall can. Go figure? > > > Just out of curiousity, your other three machines that don't have this > problem, are they all identical to the machine that does? Somehow I > think they are probably all unique in which case we can continue to > focus on the machine at hand. You are absolutely right! My other boxes are all frankenputers. Robert > > HTH > > LukeK > > -- > Luke Kearney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: File encryption: bdes or gpg
Another option that you didn't even bring up: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/disks-encrypting.html If you're not using 5.x, then this isn't available to you yet. But I thought I'd bring it up in case you weren't aware of it. Simon Bates wrote: Dear all, I am fairly new to FreeBSD and this is my first post to freebsd-questions. I hope I am asking my question in the correct forum. Apologies if not. I am hoping someone can give me advice on file encryption. I would like to encrypt a file and store it on my filesystem. I would like to encrypt the file so that my data is not readable by someone who gains root access or physical access to my computer. I do not intend to share the data with anyone else so a public/private key system is optional. I did some Googling and some reading of man pages and I have come up with 3 options thus far: 1. bdes(1) 2. gpg -c (/usr/ports/security/gnupg) 3. gpg (/usr/ports/security/gnupg) with a public/private key pair for me plus a passphrase I would really appreciate any pointers to discussions of the relative merits of these approaches or pointers to better options if available. Thank you all very much for your time. Best wishes, Simon ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: File encryption: bdes or gpg
Thank you very much for your reply and your advice. Best wishes, Simon Nathan Kinkade wrote: On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 10:02:26AM -0400, Simon Bates wrote: I am hoping someone can give me advice on file encryption. GPG would probably work well. You can encryt files symmetrically and put a passphrase on the file. Public Key encryption could work also, as long as you have a decent passphrase on your private key. If your private key is passphraseless and someone gets physical access to your machine they'll have not much problem decrypting your file. GPG also had other useful applications, such as signing emails and various files. Nathan ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: File encryption: bdes or gpg
Thank you very much for your reply, for your comments on temp file usage, and your suggestion to use gbde. Right now I am using FreeBSD 4.9 but moving to 5 is definitely an option. I'll have a look at gbde. Thanks! Simon Cordula's Web wrote: I am hoping someone can give me advice on file encryption. I would like to encrypt a file and store it on my filesystem. I would like to encrypt the file so that my data is not readable by someone who gains root access or physical access to my computer. I do not intend to share the data with anyone else so a public/private key system is optional. I did some Googling and some reading of man pages and I have come up with 3 options thus far: 1. bdes(1) 2. gpg -c (/usr/ports/security/gnupg) 3. gpg (/usr/ports/security/gnupg) with a public/private key pair for me plus a passphrase 4. gbde (on FreeBSD >= 5.X) encrypts a whole filesystem. It is much easier to use than utilities that encrypt single files. 5. bdes/idea/gpg/... on top of gbde (storing an encrypted file on an encrypted filesystem). IMHO, it's not really the encryption algorithm that is the weak link, but: a. tempfiles (or shreds of temp files) that are not physically overwritten (including swap memory), b. poor passphrases (too short or not random enough) c. human error. Many programs write to temporary files (including buffers), before writing the final versions out to disk. If you use encrypted filesystems (like gbde) everywhere a tempfile is likely to be dropped (don't forget [/var]/tmp and swap), your data would be much safer. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Porting ALSA drivers to OSS may be easy, according to OSS ;)
Hi, I've tinkered a bit with Linux and FreeBSD, but still consider myself as newbie. I'm probably going for FreeBSD since I can see the best strenghts that Linux experts point in their distros already exist on FreeBSD, mostly coherent file structure, init scripts and package management. And a great plus in FreeBSD is the documentation, never seen anything like that in a Linux distro before (Debian seems the closest to me). I know FreeBSD is mainly conceived as a performance server OS and lacks in the multimedia field when compared with Linux which is much more generic. But in terms of sound I think the scenario could change easily: you don't have ALSA drivers but according to this post it's possible to convert ALSA drivers into free OSS drivers: http://www.4front-tech.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=48#48 This could mean reduced need for commercial OSS driver support :) And of course there may be licensing issues. Not really my problem since I have a SB Live!, but this could easily improve FreeBSD image on the multimedia *NIX field :) Thanks in advance, Bruno ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: tinydns +MX
On Wed, 26 May 2004 12:18:36 -0500, Darryl Hoar wrote: > I have djbdns installed and working. I have been using DNS > on my LAN and having it resolve the names for my local machines. > It forwards any unresolved to my ISP's dns server. Detail your setup further. > Recently, I have installed qmail on my LAN for internal email. > I used the ./add-mx to add a mx record for my machine which > is running qmail. > > the mx record in the data file looks like: > @osborneindustries.com:192.168.1.89:a::86400 > > If I send test mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], it gets forwarded to > my ISP's email server. If I send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > (name of my qmail server), it gets delivered just fine. > > How do I get my mx record setup so that [EMAIL PROTECTED] gets > delivered to mail.osborneindustries.com ? qmail is going to the root servers to look for you mx, and thus finds your isp's. You have to use a split-horizon setup for that. > here are a couple of tests that I ran: [...] please run from inside your lan dnsqr mx osborneindustries.com qvb -- pica ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: mplayer + realaudio ... what to expect when installing ...
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 07:32:50PM +0200, Henrik W Lund wrote: > Erik Trulsson wrote: > > > > > > >mplayer does have about a gazillion dependencies (most of them > >optional) including X (not optional), so if you don't want X installed > >then mplayer isn't for you. > >(It is a multimedia player after all, and to play video you need > >graphics support.) > > > > Actually, you can pass make WITHOUT_GUI=yes and it will not install X. > Yes, it does display videos on the command line. No, it's not pretty. Wrong. Mplayer depends on X if you define WITHOUT_GUI. WITHOUT_GUI causes it not to have a GUI (available if mplayer is invoked as gmplayer) and to not depend on GTK. > > Anyway, for just converting RealAudio into MP3, it should do the job nicely. > > -Henrik W Lund > ___ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -- Erik Trulsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD
On Wednesday 26 May 2004 17:24, Fox wrote: > Здравствуйте! добро пожаловать. > Я вот недавно купил установочный диск с FreeBSD 5.2, и не смог его > поставить.Напишите мне пожалуйста документацию по пошаговой установке > FreeBSD 5.2. > > Заранее спасибо! My Russian is quite poor, but if I did understand you correctly, you are looking for help with the installation of FreeBSD. There is a Russian version of the FreeBSD handbook available online at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/ru_RU.KOI8-R/books/handbook/ Hope that helps. have fun! ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: File encryption: bdes or gpg
Bill Moran wrote: Another option that you didn't even bring up: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/disks-encrypting.html Right now I am running 4.9 but upgrading to 5 is definitely a possibility. Thanks a lot for the pointer. Best wishes, Simon If you're not using 5.x, then this isn't available to you yet. But I thought I'd bring it up in case you weren't aware of it. Simon Bates wrote: I am hoping someone can give me advice on file encryption. I would like to encrypt a file and store it on my filesystem. I would like to encrypt the file so that my data is not readable by someone who gains root access or physical access to my computer. I do not intend to share the data with anyone else so a public/private key system is optional. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
bochs ethernet card
Greetings: Can someone explain what this line does? device ed0 at isa? disable port 0x280 irq 10 iomem 0x8000 >From what I understand. The 'disable' portion of the above config keeps ed0 'not found' errors from showing up. The ed0 device is loaded for an isa device on irq 10 with port address 0x280. Is "device ed0 at isa? disable port 0x280 irq 10 iomem 0x8000" part of the default kernel for 4.10RC3? I just noticed that pico bsd recognizes the ed0 device from boch emulator for ne2000, but the release version of the 4.10RC3 doesn't recognize it. Any thoughts? Thanks, Brian ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: boot0cfg
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 07:27:17AM -0700, Me wrote: > Hi, > I'm sure this has been asked before, but I cant find > any good info. > I'm having problems reinstalling the bootloader, i'm > running 5.2.1, I made it to the fixit console but when > i type boot0cfg -d da0, i get: I/O error. > Any Ideas? > > Br, > > Joe You appear to have the commands arguments confused. Take another look at the man page. The -d option specifies a BIOS drive number - you can usually leave this blank and it will defaul to the first BIOS drive, which is generally correct for most setups. You probably want a command more like: # boot0cfg -Bv da0 There are other useful options, such as setting the delay and setting the default partition/disk to boot. I myself usually use the command: # boot0cfg -Bv -o noupdate -t 50 Nathan pgpQzbQGUscCB.pgp Description: PGP signature
[Fwd: Re: FreeBSD to Windows No Reboot]
--- Begin Message --- On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 17:20, Bryan Maxwell wrote: > Is there a way I can go from FreeBSD to windows without rebooting? > Also if I have an active serial line sl0, can i run hyper terminal in > windows with that same line? And lastly, is there a hyperterminal > program in FreeBSD and do i have to turn off the SLIP sl0 for it to > run properly? Basically I have a PIC 16F819, it will respond to a > character and display an array. Im trying to collect the packet that > is sent for an HTML request and display what the PIC itself received. > I have already seen the tcpdump/tcpshow packets. This will help > me decode the TCP and my C++ code in my PIC. Thanks in advance. > Bryan Maxwel im not sure if i fully understand what it is you are doing but how about running windows inside a virtual machine like vmware ? arden > > > - > Do you Yahoo!? > Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger > ___ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > --- End Message --- ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
NDIS problem under 5.2.1
I used ndiscvt to convert windows drivers for a netgear WG311v2, recompiled the kernel and get the following in my dmesg output: ndis0: mem 0xfeac000, 0xfead, 0xfeafe000-0xfea irq22 at device 1.0 on pci2 ndis0: Reserved 0x2 bytes for rid 0x14 type3 at 0xfeac ndis0: Reserved 0x2000 bytes for ris 0x10 type3 at 0xfeafe000 ndis: [GIANT-LOCKED] cab't re-use a leaf (dot11BesiredBSS Type)! no match for srand ndis0: NDIS 01 version: 5.1 ndis0: init handler failed device-probe-and-attach: ndis0 attach returned 6 Any pointers would be appreciated. PWR. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Updating OpenSSL ...
I'd like to install the OpenSSL port, and stay current with it in the future. It isn't clear to me what I have to do to have the system use the port, instead of what's in the base, and what I'll need to rebuild after installing the port. -ste ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: File encryption: bdes or gpg
> >>1. bdes(1) > >> > >>2. gpg -c (/usr/ports/security/gnupg) > >> > >>3. gpg (/usr/ports/security/gnupg) with a public/private key pair for me > >>plus a passphrase > > > > > > 4. gbde (on FreeBSD >= 5.X) encrypts a whole filesystem. > > It is much easier to use than utilities that encrypt > > single files. > > > > 5. bdes/idea/gpg/... on top of gbde (storing an encrypted file > > on an encrypted filesystem). The openssl(1) binary can also be used to encrypt individual files using a lot of possible ciphers. But you need to be careful with it, because you can very easily shoot yourself in the foot ;-) -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: config is out of sinc
On Tuesday 25 May 2004 06:35 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 01:40:36PM -0500, Earl Larsen wrote: > > I installed FreeBSD 4.9-stabel, and used cvs to update everything. And > > when I tried to build my personel Kernel by using. Make build > > KERNCONF... it came up with the fallowing : > > It looks like you've accidentally updated your sources to 5.2-CURRENT. > Check your cvsupfile against the sample files provided, and post it > here if you need more help. > > Kris No I have 4.9 for the source. Hear is my cvsupfile: *default host=cvsup12.us.FreeBSD.org *default base=/usr/local/etc/cvsup *default prefix=/usr *default tag=RELENG_4_9_RELEASE *default release=cvs delete use-rel-suffix *default compress src-all tag=. ports-all tag=. doc-all tag=. cvsroot-all tag=. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: mplayer + realaudio ... what to expect when installing ...
On Wed, 26 May 2004, Erik Trulsson wrote: > On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 07:32:50PM +0200, Henrik W Lund wrote: > > Erik Trulsson wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >mplayer does have about a gazillion dependencies (most of them > > >optional) including X (not optional), so if you don't want X installed > > >then mplayer isn't for you. > > >(It is a multimedia player after all, and to play video you need > > >graphics support.) > > > > > > > Actually, you can pass make WITHOUT_GUI=yes and it will not install X. > > Yes, it does display videos on the command line. No, it's not pretty. > > Wrong. Mplayer depends on X if you define WITHOUT_GUI. > WITHOUT_GUI causes it not to have a GUI (available if mplayer is > invoked as gmplayer) and to not depend on GTK. mplayer -vo sgva works fine without X - whether you can build it without X, I don't know and I rather doubt. It makes a fine viewer for lynx, although you have to suid. Since it will no longer work with X if you suid it, I just copy and rename the binary which I suid. -- Lars Eighner [EMAIL PROTECTED] -finger for geek code- http://www.io.com/~eighner/index.html 8800 N IH35 APT 1191 AUSTIN TX 78753-5266 ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Porting ALSA drivers to OSS may be easy, according to OSS ;)
In the last episode (May 26), Bruno said: > I know FreeBSD is mainly conceived as a performance server OS and > lacks in the multimedia field when compared with Linux which is much > more generic. > > But in terms of sound I think the scenario could change easily: you > don't have ALSA drivers but according to this post it's possible to > convert ALSA drivers into free OSS drivers: > > http://www.4front-tech.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=48#48 > > This could mean reduced need for commercial OSS driver support :) And > of course there may be licensing issues. > > Not really my problem since I have a SB Live!, but this could easily > improve FreeBSD image on the multimedia *NIX field :) Are there very many cards not supported by FreeBSD? Note that OSS can mean two things: drivers provided by 4front, or a userland API for playing sound. FreeBSD's sound system provides an OSS API, but is not OSS internally. Porting a Linux ALSA driver to FreeBSD is probably about as easy as porting a Linux OSS driver. -- Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
difference between 4.2 and 5.2.1
Hi team, I have couple of questions. Would you please answer it. Beside supporting more types of NIC card, what other differences are there between FreeBSD 4.2 (or 4.0 series) and 5.2.1 (5.0 Series)? Also, is multicasting supported on 5.2.1? Thanks, -A. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
DHCPIS DOWN..
well, severe troubles on my primary server.. dhcp won't start. it looks like troble with bpf... at least when i try to start dhcp by hand, it complains that it can't find a bfp and quit. can anybody help me here? --i am currently rebuilding my kernel with more bfp's in my KERNCONF file-- gary ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD ISDN Modem Support
Michael Hollmann wrote: does freebsd support this isdn-modem? ELSA MicroLink ISDN/TLV34 Yes, of course it will work, because it is an external modem/TA that is connected to a serial port. There is no need for a special hardware support. cu, Uwe ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
disk controller
Hi, I have an Intel 82801EB Ultra ATA disk controller. For FreeBSD 4.9, I see that this is not supported and on installation I don't know if it freezes or its trying to search for my disk controller. It's searching for it and i've spent over an hour waiting for it to find it. Can you tell me if this will be supported or if there is a work around, because i can not install. I'm using an Intel 865PE chip set with 2.4ghz P4. Thanks, Nick ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
perl and berkeley
Freebsd 4.8 1. installed a perl mod that decided it needed Perl 5.8. that went ok, but now I've got /usr/bin/perl 5.0 /usr/local/bin/perl 5.8 What is the command to get the sytstem to switch to defaulting to 5.8? 2. "pkg_add -r db3" also went ok, but perl -MCPAN -e 'install BerkeleyDB' bombs out with: /usr/bin/perl -I/usr/libdata/perl/5.00503/mach -I/usr/libdata/perl/5.00503 /usr/libdata/perl/5.00503/ExtUtils/xsubpp -noprototypes -typemap /usr/libdata/perl/5.00503/ExtUtils/typemap -typemap typemap BerkeleyDB.xs >xstmp.c && mv xstmp.c BerkeleyDB.c cc -c -I./libraries/4.2.41/include -DVERSION=\"0.25\" -DXS_VERSION=\"0.25\" -DPIC -fpic -I/usr/libdata/perl/5.00503/mach/CORE BerkeleyDB.c BerkeleyDB.xs:74: #error db.h is from Berkeley DB 1.x - need at least Berkeley DB 2.6.4 *** Error code 1 thanks Len ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
RE: SMTP AUTH
On Wed, 26 May 2004, Lee Dilkie wrote: You've got "This server requires a secure connection (SSL)" enabled for the SMTP server in Outlook? In my experience (outlook 2000, not tested on outlook express) this won't work. Outlook doesn't seem to understand that "use SSL" means "use STARTLS". What I did was to configure sendmail to also support "smtps" (SSL before SMTP) on the smtps port (465) and point outlook at that port with the "use ssl" checked. Outlook 2002 (from Office XP) will try STARTTLS if SMTP-over-SSL doesn't work for any port other than 25, apparently, but as I said, it's still a bit hairy. I've got clients in .us, .uk, and .nz doing this with my server in .nz. FWIW, I believe Microsoft are still working on this - I'm told they might default to trying STARTTLS first for port 587. These things take time; the MSA standard is only about five years old, after all... Cheers Richard -- Richard Stevenson ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD to Windows No Reboot
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 09:20:07AM -0700, Bryan Maxwell wrote: > Is there a way I can go from FreeBSD to windows without rebooting? no, that's not possible. > Also if I have an active serial line sl0, can i run hyper terminal in > windows with that same line? don't know exactly what you mean, sorry. > And lastly, is there a hyperterminal > program in FreeBSD tip(1) (comes with the base os) or /usr/ports/comms/minicom > and do i have to turn off the SLIP sl0 for it to > run properly? Basically I have a PIC 16F819, it will respond to a don't know exactly what you mean, sorry. hth, toni -- Wer es einmal so weit gebracht hat, dass er nicht | toni at stderror dot at mehr irrt, der hat auch zu arbeiten aufgehoert| Toni Schmidbauer -- Max Planck | pgpnfEoGdsXQO.pgp Description: PGP signature
Measuring the stack usage of a program
Hi everyone! Does anyone know, if it is possible to meassure the maximum stack usage of a C program throughout it's entire execution? -- Michael Birkmose ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Odd one: my root account disappears into hyperspace.
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 03:06:52PM +0100, Andy Holyer wrote: > I ssh into my server as myself, and then su to root. At which point > something odd happens: > > a) the output of some shell commands seems to be redirected somewhere > other then my xterm; > b) when I try to run emacs or vi, I get: "emacs: standard input is not > a tty" > > This doesn't happen when I log in as another user and try it. I've > tried comparing the contents of our two home directories, and there > appears no difference. show us exactly what commands you are using. look for io redirections (< or > in bash) in your .profile, .bashrc, root's .profile and .bashrc and finally /etc/profile and any scripts that are called from within the mentioned files. hth, toni -- Wer es einmal so weit gebracht hat, dass er nicht | toni at stderror dot at mehr irrt, der hat auch zu arbeiten aufgehoert| Toni Schmidbauer -- Max Planck | pgpVUcDxtMgUF.pgp Description: PGP signature
[no subject]
Hi all I've got a quick question about the most recent security advisory, FreeBSD-SA-04:11.msync. I'm trying to figure out how big an issue it is (whether or not I need to stop everyone's access to the file server until it's patched), given that we've got no "untrusted" users on our systems. Does anyone know if it's possible for a user to trigger this problem unintentionally or accidentally? Cheers Richard -- Richard Stevenson ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
RE: ethernet card not coming up on reboot
Before you run the netstart command, you need to kill all processes named dhclient. You can accomplish this with a: #killall -9 dhclient And then, #sh /etc/netstart Eric F Crist President AdTech Integrated Systems, Inc (612) 998-3588 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 12:45 PM To: Luke Kearney Cc: Eric Crist; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ethernet card not coming up on reboot Subject: Re: ethernet card not coming up on reboot > > On Tue, 25 May 2004 20:00:12 -1000 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake thus: > > > Aloha Eric and Luke > > > > I am aware that sysinstall will append to rc.conf. > > I went ahead and deleted all of the appends and rebooted. The > > ethernet did not come up on reboot. I had to use sysinstall to get > > an ip. And yes, it did append to rc.conf again. > > > > I will look into setting a static ip but I would like > > to know why this is happening. I have 3 other boxes > > that have FreeBSD on them and they don't have this problem. > > > > Robert > > > > - Original Message - On Tuesday, May 25, 2004 8:15 pm Luke Kearney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When you used /stand/sysinstall again did you reboot to get the IP or > did you bring up the interface by hand? I am wondering if having only > one config line in rc.conf gives you no IP upon boot whether or not > having booted and go no address can you get one by using netstart or > not? eg > > #sh /etc/netstart > > This should re-read your rc.conf file and execute the network related > cmds. After "sh /etc/netstart" I get : hw.bus.devctl_disable: 1-> 1 (then the lo0 printou) dhclient already running? (pid-221) and ifconfig -a unchanged. have to use sysinsstall. > > One more shot in the dark and believe me this is a shot in the > dark, try > changing the line in rc.conf to ifconfig_sk0="UP" and then through > rc.local run dhclient as a separate script. The net effect being that > you start the interface before trying to get an IP as a separate > process. I tried this but it didn't change anything...if I did it right? I edited rc.conf and changed the line [ifconfig_sk0="DHCP"] to [ifconfig_sk0="UP"] and created /usr/local/etc/rc.d/rc.local to read ifconfig_sk0="DHCP" When I did this I could never i initialize DHCP. Even sysinstall failed. as a side note, during boot, the sequence delays for over a minute during starting DHClient. It can't initialize sk0 but sysinstall can. Go figure? > > > Just out of curiousity, your other three machines that don't have this > problem, are they all identical to the machine that does? Somehow I > think they are probably all unique in which case we can continue to > focus on the machine at hand. You are absolutely right! My other boxes are all frankenputers. Robert > > HTH > > LukeK > > -- > Luke Kearney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: perl and berkeley
Please try: which perl This will show which perl executable you are actually calling. I guess typing: /usr/local/bin/perl -MCPAN -e 'install BerkeleyDB' will fix the problem. I guess /usr/bin/perl is in front of /usr/local/bin/perl in your $PATH. Peter - Original Message - From: "Len Conrad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 12:18 AM Subject: perl and berkeley > Freebsd 4.8 > > 1. installed a perl mod that decided it needed Perl 5.8. that went ok, but > now I've got > > /usr/bin/perl 5.0 > /usr/local/bin/perl 5.8 > > What is the command to get the sytstem to switch to defaulting to 5.8? > > > 2. "pkg_add -r db3" also went ok, but > > perl -MCPAN -e 'install BerkeleyDB' > > bombs out with: > > /usr/bin/perl -I/usr/libdata/perl/5.00503/mach -I/usr/libdata/perl/5.00503 > /usr/libdata/perl/5.00503/ExtUtils/xsubpp -noprototypes -typemap > /usr/libdata/perl/5.00503/ExtUtils/typemap -typemap typemap > BerkeleyDB.xs >xstmp.c && mv xstmp.c BerkeleyDB.c > cc -c > -I./libraries/4.2.41/include -DVERSION=\"0.25\" > -DXS_VERSION=\"0.25\" -DPIC -fpic > -I/usr/libdata/perl/5.00503/mach/CORE BerkeleyDB.c > BerkeleyDB.xs:74: #error db.h is from Berkeley DB 1.x - need at least > Berkeley DB 2.6.4 > *** Error code 1 > > thanks > Len > > ___ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: perl and berkeley
* Len Conrad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-26 14:18 -0800]: > 1. installed a perl mod that decided it needed Perl 5.8. that went > ok, but now I've got > > /usr/bin/perl 5.0 > /usr/local/bin/perl 5.8 > > What is the command to get the sytstem to switch to defaulting to 5.8? According to /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8/pkg-message: #v+ If you want this version of Perl to be used by default, please type use.perl port #v- Check out the rest of that file for more information. > 2. "pkg_add -r db3" also went ok, but No idea on this one. ;] HTH, -- dave [ please don't CC me ] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: config is out of sinc
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 02:41:21PM -0500, Earl Larsen wrote: > On Tuesday 25 May 2004 06:35 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 01:40:36PM -0500, Earl Larsen wrote: > > > I installed FreeBSD 4.9-stabel, and used cvs to update everything. And > > > when I tried to build my personel Kernel by using. Make build > > > KERNCONF... it came up with the fallowing : > > > > It looks like you've accidentally updated your sources to 5.2-CURRENT. > > Check your cvsupfile against the sample files provided, and post it > > here if you need more help. > > > > Kris > No I have 4.9 for the source. Hear is my cvsupfile: > > *default host=cvsup12.us.FreeBSD.org > *default base=/usr/local/etc/cvsup > *default prefix=/usr > *default tag=RELENG_4_9_RELEASE > *default release=cvs delete use-rel-suffix > *default compress > src-all tag=. > ports-all tag=. > doc-all tag=. > cvsroot-all tag=. Read the documentation to find out what the "tag=." does ;-) Kris pgpEv12PCf2hG.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RE: ethernet card not coming up on reboot
Aloha and Mahalo Okay, that works. I dropped out of gnome and logged ina s root. I deleted all the append data in rc.conf and I deleted /usr/local/etc/rc.d/rc.local. I then rebooted. When I came back up ifconfig showed no ip address. I then did the "killall -9 dhclient" and the "sh /etc/netstart". After that completed ifconfig showed the ip address. So, what's happening? Is there a sequence problem or do I need to have a script run to kill dhclient and then run netstart? Thanks for your time helping with this problem. Robert - Original Message - From: Eric Crist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 12:53 pm Subject: RE: ethernet card not coming up on reboot > Before you run the netstart command, you need to kill all processes > named dhclient. You can accomplish this with a: > > #killall -9 dhclient > > And then, #sh /etc/netstart > > Eric F Crist > President > AdTech Integrated Systems, Inc > (612) 998-3588 > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 12:45 PM > To: Luke Kearney > Cc: Eric Crist; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: ethernet card not coming up on reboot > > > > Subject: Re: ethernet card not coming up on reboot > > > > > On Tue, 25 May 2004 20:00:12 -1000 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake thus: > > > > > Aloha Eric and Luke > > > > > > I am aware that sysinstall will append to rc.conf. > > > I went ahead and deleted all of the appends and rebooted. The > > > ethernet did not come up on reboot. I had to use sysinstall to get > > > an ip. And yes, it did append to rc.conf again. > > > > > > I will look into setting a static ip but I would like > > > to know why this is happening. I have 3 other boxes > > > that have FreeBSD on them and they don't have this problem. > > > > > > Robert > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > On Tuesday, May 25, 2004 8:15 pm > Luke Kearney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > When you used /stand/sysinstall again did you reboot to get the > IP or > > did you bring up the interface by hand? I am wondering if having > only> one config line in rc.conf gives you no IP upon boot whether > or not > > having booted and go no address can you get one by using netstart or > > not? eg > > > > #sh /etc/netstart > > > > This should re-read your rc.conf file and execute the network > related> cmds. > > After "sh /etc/netstart" I get : > > hw.bus.devctl_disable: 1-> 1 > (then the lo0 printou) > dhclient already running? (pid-221) > > and ifconfig -a unchanged. have to use sysinsstall. > > > > > One more shot in the dark and believe me this is a shot in the > > dark, try > > changing the line in rc.conf to ifconfig_sk0="UP" and then through > > rc.local run dhclient as a separate script. The net effect being > that> you start the interface before trying to get an IP as a separate > > process. > > I tried this but it didn't change anything...if I did it right? I > editedrc.conf and changed the line [ifconfig_sk0="DHCP"] to > [ifconfig_sk0="UP"] and created /usr/local/etc/rc.d/rc.local to read > ifconfig_sk0="DHCP" > > When I did this I could never i initialize DHCP. Even sysinstall > failed. > as a side note, during boot, the sequence delays for over a minute > during starting DHClient. It can't initialize sk0 but sysinstall > can. Go > figure? > > > > > > > Just out of curiousity, your other three machines that don't have > this > > problem, are they all identical to the machine that does? Somehow I > > think they are probably all unique in which case we can continue to > > focus on the machine at hand. > > You are absolutely right! My other boxes are all frankenputers. > > Robert > > > > HTH > > > > LukeK > > > > -- > > Luke Kearney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: File encryption: bdes or gpg
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 10:02:26AM -0400, Simon Bates wrote: > Dear all, > > I am fairly new to FreeBSD and this is my first post to > freebsd-questions. I hope I am asking my question in the correct forum. > Apologies if not. > > I am hoping someone can give me advice on file encryption. I would like > to encrypt a file and store it on my filesystem. I would like to encrypt > the file so that my data is not readable by someone who gains root > access or physical access to my computer. I do not intend to share the > data with anyone else so a public/private key system is optional. > > I did some Googling and some reading of man pages and I have come up > with 3 options thus far: > > 1. bdes(1) > > 2. gpg -c (/usr/ports/security/gnupg) > > 3. gpg (/usr/ports/security/gnupg) with a public/private key pair for me > plus a passphrase > > I would really appreciate any pointers to discussions of the relative > merits of these approaches or pointers to better options if available. > > Thank you all very much for your time. Best wishes, > Simon GPG would probably work well. You can encryt files symmetrically and put a passphrase on the file. Public Key encryption could work also, as long as you have a decent passphrase on your private key. If your private key is passphraseless and someone gets physical access to your machine they'll have not much problem decrypting your file. GPG also had other useful applications, such as signing emails and various files. Nathan pgpXN0ud9uvvo.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: difference between 4.2 and 5.2.1
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 01:32:24PM -0700, Amir Vetry wrote: > Hi team, > I have couple of questions. Would you please answer it. > > Beside supporting more types of NIC card, what other differences are there > between > FreeBSD 4.2 (or 4.0 series) and 5.2.1 (5.0 Series)? There are literally thousands of differences, big and small. The best place to start is to read the release notes for all the intervening releases to find out what has changed. > Also, is multicasting supported on 5.2.1? Yes, as on 4.x. Kris pgpkwXZQqXHO6.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: DHCP is down..
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 01:51:46PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote: > > well, severe troubles on my primary server.. dhcp > won't start. it looks like troble with bpf... > at least when i try to start dhcp by hand, it complains > that it can't find a bfp and quit. > > can anybody help me here? --i am currently rebuilding > my kernel with more bfp's in my KERNCONF file-- > People, Well, sorry if it is bad-form to reply to my eaelier post. MAKEDEV'ing bfp16 may have beenn part of it. I have a more important question; does anybody have any insights into *why* when I typed # sh /usr/local/etc/rc.d/isc-dhcpd.sh status|stop|start did I get a truckload of errors from named[`pid`]??!! Nothing I did got the daemon working... . I am uusing bind-9 which is installed in /usr/local/sbin/. The default bind stuff is in /usr/sbin. Was part of the isc-dhcp* stuff called the contrib named? I blew away 5+ hours with my network down I sure hope someone can de-idiotize me. gary -- Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.thought.org Public service Unix ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
RE: DHCP is down..
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Kline > Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 8:09 PM > To: Gary Kline > Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List > Subject: Re: DHCP is down.. > > > On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 01:51:46PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote: > > > > well, severe troubles on my primary server.. dhcp > > won't start. it looks like troble with bpf... > > at least when i try to start dhcp by hand, it complains > > that it can't find a bfp and quit. > > > > can anybody help me here? --i am currently rebuilding > > my kernel with more bfp's in my KERNCONF file-- > > > > People, > > Well, sorry if it is bad-form to reply to my eaelier post. > MAKEDEV'ing bfp16 may have beenn part of it. I have a > more important question; does anybody have any insights > into *why* when I typed > > # sh /usr/local/etc/rc.d/isc-dhcpd.sh status|stop|start > > did I get a truckload of errors from named[`pid`]??!! > Nothing I did got the daemon working... . > > I am uusing bind-9 which is installed in /usr/local/sbin/. > The default bind stuff is in /usr/sbin. Was part of the > isc-dhcp* stuff called the contrib named? > > I blew away 5+ hours with my network down I sure hope > someone can de-idiotize me. > > gary Gary, Please tell me you didn't type the following, verbatim: # sh /usr/local/etc/rc.d/isc-dhcpd.sh status|stop|start If this _is_ indeed the case, you need to try: #sh /usr/local/etc/rc.d/isc-dhcpd.sh start If that completes without errors, try: #sh /usr/local/etc/rc.d/isc-dhcpd.sh status Once you do this, please respond to the list so we know how it turned out. HTH Eric F Crist ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
error compiling XFree86-4-libraries
Hi I'm upgrading my XFree86 libraries from XFree86-libraries-4.3.0_6 to XFree86-libraries-4.3.0_7 my box is FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE p6 compiling Xfree86-4-libraries it stopped at rm -f AuRead.c ln -s /home/usr/ports/x11/XFree86-4-libraries/work/xc/lib/Xau/AuRead.c AuRead.c rm -f ks_tables.h makekeys makekeys.o cc -o makekeys -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -ansi -Dasm=__asm GccWarningOptions-I/home/usr/ports/x11/XFree86-4-libraries/work/xc -I/home/usr/ports/x11/XFree86-4-libraries/work/xc/exports/include -DCSRG_BASED -DFUNCPROTO=15 -DNARROWPROTO -DXTHREADS -D_THREAD_SAFE -DXUSE_MTSAFE_API -DXNO_MTSAFE_PWDAPI-DMALLOC_0_RETURNS_NULL -DHAS_SNPRINTF -DLIBX11 -DPOSTLOCALELIBDIR=\"lib\" util/makekeys.c -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lc_r -Wl,-rpath,/usr/X11R6/lib cc: GccWarningOptions: No such file or directory *** Error code 1 (ignored) ./makekeys < /home/usr/ports/x11/XFree86-4-libraries/work/xc/exports/include/X11/keysymdef.h > ks_tables_h ./makekeys: not found *** Error code 127 Stop in /home/usr/ports/x11/XFree86-4-libraries/work/xc/lib/X11. *** Error code 1 Stop in /home/usr/ports/x11/XFree86-4-libraries/work/xc/lib. *** Error code 1 Stop in /home/usr/ports/x11/XFree86-4-libraries. without resolving this issue i can't upgrade other ports, or install new packages that depend on XFree86-libraries I had makeworld twice since i got this problem. Anything i could do to solve my problem? thanks sham khalil This e-mail has been sent via JARING webmail at http://www.jaring.my ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: config is out of sinc
On Wednesday 26 May 2004 06:41 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 02:41:21PM -0500, Earl Larsen wrote: > > On Tuesday 25 May 2004 06:35 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 01:40:36PM -0500, Earl Larsen wrote: > > > > I installed FreeBSD 4.9-stabel, and used cvs to update everything. > > > > And when I tried to build my personel Kernel by using. Make build > > > > KERNCONF... it came up with the fallowing : > > > > > > It looks like you've accidentally updated your sources to 5.2-CURRENT. > > > Check your cvsupfile against the sample files provided, and post it > > > here if you need more help. > > > > > > Kris > > > > No I have 4.9 for the source. Hear is my cvsupfile: > > > > *default host=cvsup12.us.FreeBSD.org > > *default base=/usr/local/etc/cvsup > > *default prefix=/usr > > *default tag=RELENG_4_9_RELEASE > > *default release=cvs delete use-rel-suffix > > *default compress > > src-all tag=. > > ports-all tag=. > > doc-all tag=. > > cvsroot-all tag=. > > Read the documentation to find out what the "tag=." does ;-) > > Kris So I should edit my cvsupfile to read as the fallowing: *default host=cvsup12.us.FreeBSD.org *default base=/usr/local/etc/cvsup *default prefix=/usr *default tag=RELENG_4_9_RELEASE *default date=2003.10.28 *default release=cvs delete use-rel-suffix *default compress src-all date=. ports-all tag=. doc-all tag=. cvsroot-all date=. And it will update all of 4.9 as 4.9? To update my system corectly. Should I run mergmaster, after cvsed the system. Since I ran mergmaster with the incorrect files. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: perl and berkeley
which perl This will show which perl executable you are actually calling. the system perl: # which perl /usr/bin/perl I guess typing: /usr/local/bin/perl -MCPAN -e 'install BerkeleyDB' that fails, too, same error Len ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: config is out of sinc
On Wednesday 26 May 2004 10:59 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 10:23:03PM -0500, Earl Larsen wrote: > > > Read the documentation to find out what the "tag=." does ;-) > > > > > > Kris > > > > So I should edit my cvsupfile to read as the fallowing: > > > > *default host=cvsup12.us.FreeBSD.org > > *default base=/usr/local/etc/cvsup > > *default prefix=/usr > > *default tag=RELENG_4_9_RELEASE > > *default date=2003.10.28 > > *default release=cvs delete use-rel-suffix > > *default compress > > src-all date=. > > ports-all tag=. > > doc-all tag=. > > cvsroot-all date=. > > > > And it will update all of 4.9 as 4.9? To update my system corectly. > > Should I run mergmaster, after cvsed the system. Since I ran mergmaster > > with the incorrect files. > > No, you're way off. See the sample configuration files, and read the > documentation on cvsup in the handbook. > > Kris Where is the sample config files located? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
FW: DHCP is down..
-Original Message- From: Thomas Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 9:34 PM To: Eric Crist Subject: Re: DHCP is down.. Do you have this in the begining of dhcpd.conf ddns-update-style none; ? If you don't put it in at the top of config Please read above Apparently, you sent this to wrong person, or didn't reply to the entire list. Eric F Crist President AdTech Integrated Systems, Inc (612) 998-3588 ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Problem after running portupgrade (continue)
Hi folks, I found following files on # ls -lh /tmp/ srwxrwxrwx 1 wnn wheel 0B Mar 28 23:22 cd_sockV4 srwxr-xr-x 1 satimis wheel 0B May 25 19:33 file1XG2EX srwxr-xr-x 1 satimis wheel 0B May 25 22:37 file38j0wR srwxr-xr-x 1 satimis wheel 0B May 23 23:41 file4Umjgt srwxr-xr-x 1 satimis wheel 0B May 24 23:03 fileBSC8C0 srwxr-xr-x 1 satimis wheel 0B May 24 23:41 fileQJVrqc srwxr-xr-x 1 satimis wheel 0B May 23 20:04 fileZZ7EKb srwxr-xr-x 1 satimis wheel 0B May 23 00:27 fileZzv73Y srwxr-xr-x 1 satimis wheel 0B May 27 09:01 filedInBFW srwxr-xr-x 1 satimis wheel 0B May 25 15:40 filehXKshb srwxr-xr-x 1 satimis wheel 0B May 26 23:47 filel6qaBo srwxr-xr-x 1 satimis wheel 0B May 23 00:29 filelVIjRu srwxr-xr-x 1 satimis wheel 0B May 25 23:37 fileq1kqeJ srwxr-xr-x 1 satimis wheel 0B May 23 19:57 fileqqmG1v srwxr-xr-x 1 satimis wheel 0B May 25 13:08 filercSbq1 srwxr-xr-x 1 satimis wheel 0B May 23 08:15 fileshMHVV srwxr-xr-x 1 satimis wheel 0B May 26 00:09 filewt72dp But they can't be moved to /urs/tmp Any advise? What are they for and how they were created. Can I delete them all TIA B.R. Stephen Liu ___ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com.hk address at http://mail.english.yahoo.com.hk ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
