Re: mod_perl ... mod_perl2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 FreeBSD Daemon wrote: | Dear list, | | What is the difference between mod_perl and mod_perl2 in the port | collection of 4.10? | | TIA | | zheyu | ___ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list | http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions | To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | One is the devel version of Mod Perl and the other is the stable - http://perl.apache.org/download/index.html you might find it faster to read the pkg-descr in the ports and visit the website than write to the list to try and find out. - -- Do yourself a favor, don't use IE! www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/ PGP is Preferable for Email, Public key available off PGP Key Server. GPG Key ID: 0x787AD6A9 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQCVAwUBQSBfqwx4IHh4etapAQJ03QQAkMvxI51jM8OE/LSllebpMaP4889ZGV0K oyGDoNMoqz8Q21VEvt7g7L3KWUuiCCmZX5ZeJqH5wFqsAQxFspBA65A1R8vSUNaI d0tWoItDWuRoHfwJ5zC6dbnBwDxXgQZzF6qkKf+5Gnidgtn8bVNGDDaCZOL2+PM1 PW3P0kIFiAU= =XAp6 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: root access to ftp, telnet
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 08:23:08PM -0700, Jay O'Brien wrote: Bill Moran wrote: Jay O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After I first connect via telnet as a user and attempt su, the response is you are not in the correct group (wheel) to su root. Add the user to the wheel group who you want to be able su. Thanks; I found /etc/group and edited the wheel line. Now I can telnet in and su to root. I see it was that way on the old setup. I must have added my user name to wheel when I set it up the first time, but I didn't document that selection, so I didn't repeat it when rebuilding. Eeek! You do realise you've just sent the root password across your network in plain text? Maybe your network is completely secure and you aren't running a risk by doing that, but on the whole it's a really bad idea. Get into the habit of using ssh(1) routinely for your own peace of mind, if nothing else. You can also replace ftp(1) for many purposes by scp(1) or rsync(1) (from the net/rsync port), both of which operate over ssh(1). Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK pgpdRtSR0qy2J.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: kernel module configuration
On 2004-08-15 18:04, Hanspeter Roth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: in the kernel configuration one can enable various devices by the respective 'device' statement. It seems that most drivers go into the kernel directly. Some drivers such as 'acpi' produce a kernel module. How is determined which modules become built in and which become modules? If you don't include something in the kernel it's built as a module. Can I have 'ohci' as a kernel module? I haven't tried. I don't know for sure. - Giorgos ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_php5 and php5-cli
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 07:37:53AM +0200, Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote: Is there some deeper reason why mod_php and php-cli conflict? I have got mod_php5 and apache2 running and would like to enable the php command line interface, too. How can I do this? Install the lang/php5 port which should get you both cli and mod_php5 support together. Make sure that WITH_APACHE2 is set in /etc/make.conf or equivalent so you get apache-2.x support, rather than apache-1.3.x. Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK pgpsJrKQoNV1e.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: mod_perl ... mod_perl2
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 02:18:03AM -0500, Will wrote: FreeBSD Daemon wrote: | What is the difference between mod_perl and mod_perl2 in the port | collection of 4.10? One is the devel version of Mod Perl and the other is the stable - http://perl.apache.org/download/index.html you might find it faster to read the pkg-descr in the ports and visit the website than write to the list to try and find out. While that is true, the difference is actually rather more significant than that. mod_perl only works with apache-1.3.x and mod_perl2 only works with apache-2.x. mod_perl2 is still considered a development version, which is why the version number is 1.99rNN -- only once it's achieved production quality will it be released as version 2.0. Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK pgpOpf8kYpQWo.pgp Description: PGP signature
Which version of FreeBSD to support a 3ware Escalade 7006 and 8006 controllers?
I'm looking at getting a 3ware Escalade 7006 or 8006 RAID controller for one of my servers. The machine presently runs RELENG_4_8. The twe man page for that version doesn't list the 7000 or 8000 series controllers. However, 3ware lists 4.8 as the supported version of FreeBSD for both. Which is correct? More to the point: What would be the recommended version of FreeBSD I should use for these controllers? Does it really matter? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: anjuta
John Oxley wrote: I have installed anjuta 1.2.2 from ports and am getting some odd errors: It complains that libtool is not installed but I have installed as dependencies both libtool13 and libtool15. When I symlink /usr/local/bin/libtool15 to libtool and do the same for libtoolize, the autogen.sh script works but configure is failing with: loading cache /dev/null within ltconfig ltconfig: you must specify a host type if you use `--no-verify' Try `ltconfig --help' for more information. configure: error: libtool configure failed Can anyone help me TIA, -Ox Greetings! Supply the following argument to the configure script (this can be done via the menu, I forget the exact one): --target=your system type your system type is output by the configure script, so just check the logs and copy-paste. Why this mechanism fails to supply this information to ltconfig automatically is beyond me. Hope this helps! -Henrik W Lund ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: at?
On Monday 16 August 2004 14:35, Björn Lindström wrote: I'm trying to use at(1) on our co-located server, but unless I run it as root, I get this error: at: you do not have permission to use this program I know this isn't how FreeBSD behaves by default, so I'm wondering if anyone has an idea on what our hosters might have tweaked to make this occur. For FreeBSD 4.x this *is* the default behaviour according to the man page. Read at(1) with particular attention to the files at.deny and at.allow. Malcolm ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: find -exec surprisingly slow
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 02:22:02PM -0700, Pat Lashley wrote: Could you create a user to get them; and give that user a procmail (or similar) delivery-time script to file them into subdirs based on some arbitrary characteristic? Sounds feasible. The sheer volume has overwhelmed me, though, and now I'm just throwing them out. Just FYI, Exim, with the ExiScan patches, can reject at SMTP time; and also has a 'fakereject' capability which tells the sender that the message has been rejected; but actually delivers it. Thanks for the info. I have been thinking of changing MTAs for a while. -- Paul. w http://logicsquad.net/ h http://paul.hoadley.name/ pgpHzYz6Anj4V.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: find -exec surprisingly slow
Hello, On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 11:56:10AM +0100, Scott Mitchell wrote: I don't know how committed to qmail you are, but Exim will do this out of the box. I'm pretty sure it's part of the default config file. With the exim+exiscan patches (available from ports) you can get even more creative and integrate virus scanning, SpamAssassin, etc. with very little effort. Thanks. I have been thinking of changing MTAs for a while. -- Paul. w http://logicsquad.net/ h http://paul.hoadley.name/ pgpABygqhYvTm.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Is promiscuous mode bad?
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 07:53:10PM -0700, Kevin Stevens typed: A lot of network scanners also trigger on NICS in promiscuous mode (there's a way to detect them, I forget the details at the moment) because admins want to know if any hosts are out there sniffing. How sure are you about that? AFAIK there's no way to detect a NIC in promiscuous mode *from the outside*. I would be very interested in a network scanner that could. Ruben ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Is promiscuous mode bad?
Promiscuous mode can also be enabled on most hardware routers. A hardware router in front of a private network with promiscuous mode enabled allows public internet users to access (sniff) all the traffic passing through the router as well as insert packets. This is major security leak and one that spoofers look for. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_perl ... mod_perl2
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 01:38:27PM +0800, FreeBSD Daemon wrote: What is the difference between mod_perl and mod_perl2 in the port collection of 4.10? mod_perl works with Apache 1.3; mod_perl2 works with Apache 2. See http://perl.apache.org/ more for details. Tom ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
aterm question
What can I do about this strange aterm behaviour of NOT showing é or è but instead it just gives me a ´e of `e whatever I try. I.e. vim runs fine under xterm, with dead_acute ; dead_diaeresis etc.. but if I start vim (or any other editor) under aterm all those é è ë stuff is lost. Even a normal comma or dblquote can not be printed to the screen. This happens no matter how I configure the use of this high-ascii (in XFree86 or with xmodmap makes no diff at all). I really do not know where to look anymore. Please any hints? -- dick -- http://www.nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 4.10 ++ Debian GNU/Linux (Woody) + Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilja ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Error Compiling cyrus-sasl2-saslauthd
Please don't top-post. Alex Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I found my problem. Current version of OpenSSL is 0.9.7d. Downloaded package of it off FreeBSD.org. Question now is, Why is my ports list so out of date? Just installed system today. Your ports list has nothing to do with it. Alex Thomas wrote: Trying to complie cyrus-sasl2-saslauthd from ports. Ports collection is up to date. --- Dependency warning: used OpenSSL version contains known vulnerabilities Please update or define either WITH_OPENSSL_BASE or WITH_OPENSSL_PORT *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/security/cyrus-sasl2-saslauthd. --- Checked version of OpenSSL that is installed to /usr/bin/openssl : OpenSSL 0.9.7c 30 Sep 2003 The most recent version in ports shows the same version. System is FreeBSD 5.2.1 fresh install. That's your base system. That *was* the latest version at the time FreeBSD 5.2.1 was created. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How to increase scrollback for FreeBSD-4.10?
Greetings: I have a FBSD-4.10 system that I log into using PuTTY (on a Win2K workstation). I am able to set PuTTY's scrollback to 1200 lines. When I'm on the 4.10 box the scrollback is about 200 lines. If possible I'd like to set the scroll back to 600 lines or so (at least). Question: How do I increase the scrollback on 4.10? Note: The video card on the 4.10 box is a Voodoo3-2000 (16 Mb) card. I searched the FBSD mail archives going back to 2003 and could not find a single reference. I also googled and could not turn up anything specific to FBSD. Hints? Thanks, Michael ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
4.10 Install failure.
Hey All, I am havign some trouble installing FreeBSD 4.10 on my PC. I downloaded an ISO image (and verified the checksum) from the Canadian FreeBSD FTP site. After burning the image to CD, I checked the checksums, which were the same. When I put the CD in the drive and attempt to boot from it, I just get a register dump and the computer halts. For example: AL:. AH:. AX:.. EAX: etc. I have made another CD from the same image and the same thing happens. I have a Compaq Eco PC, with a 2.0 GHz PIV processor, 256MB Ram, 40gig HDD, etc... Any suggestions on what I could try to remedy this? Thanks Tyler ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How to increase scrollback for FreeBSD-4.10?
-Original Message- From: Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 8:59 AM To: freebsd-questions Subject: How to increase scrollback for FreeBSD-4.10? Greetings: I have a FBSD-4.10 system that I log into using PuTTY (on a Win2K workstation). I am able to set PuTTY's scrollback to 1200 lines. When I'm on the 4.10 box the scrollback is about 200 lines. If possible I'd like to set the scroll back to 600 lines or so (at least). Question: How do I increase the scrollback on 4.10? Note: The video card on the 4.10 box is a Voodoo3-2000 (16 Mb) card. I searched the FBSD mail archives going back to 2003 and could not find a single reference. I also googled and could not turn up anything specific to FBSD. Hints? Thanks, Michael kbdcontrol http://groups.google.com/groups?q=FreeBSD+Console+increasehl=enlr=ie=UTF- 8selm=5q1lq7%24bjg%241%40nikko.utsunomiya-u.ac.jprnum=2 Michael Clark Nemschoff Chairs Inc mclark at nemschoff dot com CompTIA A+, Network+, Server+, MCP Voice: (920) 457 7726 x294 Fax: (920) 453 6594 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This electronic transmission, including all attachments, is directed in confidence solely to the person(s) to whom it is addressed, or an authorized recipient, and may not otherwise be distributed, copied or disclosed. The contents of the transmission may also be subject to intellectual property rights and all such rights are expressly claimed and are not waived. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by return electronic transmission and then immediately delete this transmission, including all attachments, without copying, distributing or disclosing same. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: freebsd's gallery
--- Paulo Roberto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What happened to it? I couldn't find it... While I certainly do not mean it to be as abrasive as the site proclaims (I am not saying that you are either an idiot, nor stupid)... google is good. http://www.justfuckinggoogleit.com/search?query=galleryas_sitesearch=freebsd.org Good luck. __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail is new and improved - Check it out! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to increase scrollback for FreeBSD-4.10?
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 06:58:57AM -0700, Mike wrote: When I'm on the 4.10 box the scrollback is about 200 lines. If possible I'd like to set the scroll back to 600 lines or so (at least). Question: How do I increase the scrollback on 4.10? That depends on the console program you're using. For an xterm(1), the following in ~/.Xdefaults will give you 8k scrollback lines: xterm*saveLines:8192 (Remember to run '/usr/X11R6/bin/xrdb -merge ${HOME}/.Xdefaults' out of .xsession or .xinit so that gets set every time you log in) For the system console, you'll need to play with the syscons(4) history size. Modify your kernel configuration to set options SC_HISTORY_SIZE=N where N is the number of lines of scroll back you want (default 100). Then build and install a new kernel in the usual way: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig.html There doesn't seem to be any way of achieving the same effect via sysctl(8), which is unfortunate. Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK pgpNChokvi650.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: How to increase scrollback for FreeBSD-4.10?
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 03:09:30PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 06:58:57AM -0700, Mike wrote: When I'm on the 4.10 box the scrollback is about 200 lines. If possible I'd like to set the scroll back to 600 lines or so (at least). Question: How do I increase the scrollback on 4.10? That depends on the console program you're using. For an xterm(1), the following in ~/.Xdefaults will give you 8k scrollback lines: xterm*saveLines:8192 (Remember to run '/usr/X11R6/bin/xrdb -merge ${HOME}/.Xdefaults' out of .xsession or .xinit so that gets set every time you log in) For the system console, you'll need to play with the syscons(4) history size. Modify your kernel configuration to set options SC_HISTORY_SIZE=N where N is the number of lines of scroll back you want (default 100). Then build and install a new kernel in the usual way: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig.html There doesn't seem to be any way of achieving the same effect via sysctl(8), which is unfortunate. Except of course, for the kbdcontrol(1) program which I am reminded does all that sort of stuff. Changing SC_HISTORY_SIZE will let you alter the default size of the history buffer, kbdcontrol(1) lets you override that to whatever value you want. Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK pgp0L7HCs5ELr.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: freebsd's gallery
K. Greenwood wrote: While I certainly do not mean it to be as abrasive as the site proclaims (I am not saying that you are either an idiot, nor stupid)... google is good. http://www.justfuckinggoogleit.com/search?query=galleryas_sitesearch=freebsd.org Good luck. If you are going post on the list then please refrain from attempting to insult others; otherwise, don't post. -aaron myles landwehr --; This Message was scanned by Clam AntiVirus (clamd / ClamAV version 0.75.1) on snaphat.com; Please direct questions or comments to 'admin at snaphat.com'; FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p9 ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is promiscuous mode bad?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 JJB wrote: | Promiscuous mode can also be enabled on most hardware routers. A | hardware router in front of a private network with promiscuous mode | enabled allows public internet users to access (sniff) all the | traffic passing through the router as well as insert packets. This | is major security leak and one that spoofers look for. | I am curious, how do you do that? From what I understand, a promiscous mode allows someone on the box to see all packets that hit the interface. How does it allow an attacker (outside the box) to sniff packets hitting that interface? Thanks, - -- Siddhartha Jain (CISSP) Consulting Engineer Netmagic Solutions Pvt Ltd Bombay - 400063 Phone: +91-22-26850001 Ext.128 Fax : +91-22-26850002 http://www.netmagicsolutions.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBIMWrOGaxOP7knVwRAj1nAJ9Ae+5APNi4YgeSNwxMkrv7jwUbjQCeLftp 8BIhFJfN9b5S2xUTDctKcuI= =bt2X -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NDISulator (project evil) installation on 5.2.1???
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 07:32:40PM -0500, Jorge Mario G. wrote: Hi there I Have a card that is supported by the ndisulator but it sais it's only available in -CURRENT I'm running FreeBSD-5.2.1-p9 is there any way to install the ndisulator? http://www.freebsddiary.org/ibm-thinkpad-t41.php and scroll down to Project Evil - the wireless card. -Radek ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How to increase scrollback for FreeBSD-4.10?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Original Message- From: Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 8:59 AM To: freebsd-questions Subject: How to increase scrollback for FreeBSD-4.10? Greetings: I have a FBSD-4.10 system that I log into using PuTTY (on a Win2K workstation). I am able to set PuTTY's scrollback to 1200 lines. When I'm on the 4.10 box the scrollback is about 200 lines. If possible I'd like to set the scroll back to 600 lines or so (at least). Question: How do I increase the scrollback on 4.10? Note: The video card on the 4.10 box is a Voodoo3-2000 (16 Mb) card. I searched the FBSD mail archives going back to 2003 and could not find a single reference. I also googled and could not turn up anything specific to FBSD. Hints? Thanks, Michael kbdcontrol Scroll Lock History While your system boots, probe messages scroll across the consoles screen so fast that you can not read them. Or when you list the contents of a large directory the same thing happens. The messages may have scrolled off your screen, but they are still in the screen buffer. You can redisplay the messages from the screen buffer. You hit the keyboard 'scroll lock' button, (IE: top row right side) and then use the keyboard up arrow button to scroll back through the screen buffer to redisplay the message lines. The 'page up' and 'page down' buttons also work to move backward and forwards through the screen buffer one full screen page at a time. Hit the 'scroll lock' button again when you are finished to return to the command line prompt. The default size of the screen buffer is to small to contain all the boot messages, so it should be increased to 200 lines. This is how you increase the size of the screen buffer. Add the -h 200 option onto the allscreens_flags= statement you already added to the /etc/rc.conf file ee /etc/rc.conf and add this statement, allscreens_flags=h 200 # -h size of scroll lock buffer in number of lines Save the changed file and reboot your system for your edit changes to take effect. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to increase scrollback for FreeBSD-4.10?
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 03:09:30PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 06:58:57AM -0700, Mike wrote: When I'm on the 4.10 box the scrollback is about 200 lines. If possible I'd like to set the scroll back to 600 lines or so (at least). Question: How do I increase the scrollback on 4.10? That depends on the console program you're using. For an xterm(1), the following in ~/.Xdefaults will give you 8k scrollback lines: xterm*saveLines:8192 (Remember to run '/usr/X11R6/bin/xrdb -merge ${HOME}/.Xdefaults' out of .xsession or .xinit so that gets set every time you log in) For the system console, you'll need to play with the syscons(4) history size. Modify your kernel configuration to set options SC_HISTORY_SIZE=N where N is the number of lines of scroll back you want (default 100). Then build and install a new kernel in the usual way: xterm like programs allow the -sl switch lines. I've had problems with numbers approaching 32767 but have never nailed down exactly how many lines I can save. I safely use -sl 3 for xterm, rxvt, aterm, and gnome-terminal. This would be an excellent topic to include in the fortune file: freebsd-tips -- Regards, Doug ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
subversion on 5.x
Hello, I'm trying to install subversion on a 5.x box. I've got a current ports tree and running perl 5.85. I've tried: make WITH_PERL=yes WITH_APACHE2_APR=yes install clean because i want to be able to access subversion via the apache web server interface. I'm getting an error: /usr/ports/devel/subversion/work/subversion-1.0.6/subversion/bindings/swig/s wigutil_pl.c:1073: warning: data definition has no type or storage class then an error code 1 and the process aborts. Any help appreciated. Thanks. Dave. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Security question - uids of 0
The following appeared in my latest daily security run output: Checking for uids of 0: root 0 toor 0 This is the first time I've seen this message. I checked /etc/passwd and found this: root:*:0:0:Charlie :/root:/bin/csh toor:*:0:0:Bourne-again Superuser:/root: I am running FreeBSD 4.10 as a gateway/router/firewall with IPFW for a small home LAN. I ran ps -aux and looked for any processes owned by toor but didn't find any. Is this something to be concerned about? Sorry if this is an obvious question, but I am still very much a newbie and trying to learn what I can about security. Thanks for your patience, Jim ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 4.10 Install failure.
Hey All, I am havign some trouble installing FreeBSD 4.10 on my PC. I downloaded an ISO image (and verified the checksum) from the Canadian FreeBSD FTP site. After burning the image to CD, I checked the checksums, which were the same. When I put the CD in the drive and attempt to boot from it, I just get a register dump and the computer halts. I have just got over a similar painful learning experience. I made a dumb mistake that might help you. I first just burnt the ISO file to a CD like I would any other file. (I had no idea what an ISO image was :)) After i discovered that you need special software to burn an ISO image, I downloaded the trial version of UltraISO software. It wanted to use Nero Burning ROM to actually do the burn. Once I had these 2 bits of software installed, I could actually use the CD's I burnt. I also burnt CD's of the 2 flp images. I happened to use Sonic Record Now to do that, and there was a button I could press that read the flp image and created a bootable CD. (This was pretty useful because the floppy drive in the PC was unusable) Hope this helps Peter ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Security question - uids of 0
Hi James, The following appeared in my latest daily security run output: Checking for uids of 0: root 0 toor 0 This is the first time I've seen this message. I checked /etc/passwd and found this: root:*:0:0:Charlie :/root:/bin/csh toor:*:0:0:Bourne-again Superuser:/root: I am running FreeBSD 4.10 as a gateway/router/firewall with IPFW for a small home LAN. I ran ps -aux and looked for any processes owned by toor but didn't find any. did you install bash? Normally, the bash from ports or packages will install the toor account so you don't have to change root's shell. If you installed bash then there's nothing to worry about this entry. If you don't need it, just use vipw and delete it. -volker ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: freebsd's gallery
--- Aaron Myles Landwehr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: K. Greenwood wrote: While I certainly do not mean it to be as abrasive as the site proclaims (I am not saying that you are either an idiot, nor stupid)... google is good. http://www.justfuckinggoogleit.com/search?query=galleryas_sitesearch=freebsd.org Good luck. If you are going post on the list then please refrain from attempting to insult others; otherwise, don't post. -aaron myles landwehr Aaron. I appreciate your concern... and I certainly intended no offense as stated prior, by the following: While I certainly do not mean it to be as abrasive as the site proclaims (I am not saying that you are either an idiot, nor stupid)... google is good. Paulo... if I did not emphasize that enough, and you were offended, I am sorry. I did not mean to imply that you are either dumb, an idiot, or stupid. Once again, if you took offense, I do apologise. __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Security question - uids of 0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 James A. Coulter wrote: | The following appeared in my latest daily security run output: | | Checking for uids of 0: | root 0 | toor 0 | | This is the first time I've seen this message. | | I checked /etc/passwd and found this: | | root:*:0:0:Charlie :/root:/bin/csh | toor:*:0:0:Bourne-again Superuser:/root: | | I am running FreeBSD 4.10 as a gateway/router/firewall with IPFW for a small | home LAN. | | I ran ps -aux and looked for any processes owned by toor but didn't find any. | | Is this something to be concerned about? | | Sorry if this is an obvious question, but I am still very much a newbie | and trying to learn what I can about security. http://freebsd.active-venture.com/faq/security.html#TOOR-ACCOUNT - -- Siddhartha Jain (CISSP) Consulting Engineer Netmagic Solutions Pvt Ltd Bombay - 400063 Phone: +91-22-26850001 Ext.128 Fax : +91-22-26850002 http://www.netmagicsolutions.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBIM3MOGaxOP7knVwRAv1HAJ4+/67fLaZbpgR3U25vy9xGMLtelQCeKhdO iTuVWEHFhbH/n+1tXxNIYFY= =RBsX -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Security question - uids of 0
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 09:57:37AM -0500, James A. Coulter wrote: The following appeared in my latest daily security run output: Checking for uids of 0: root 0 toor 0 This is the first time I've seen this message. I checked /etc/passwd and found this: root:*:0:0:Charlie :/root:/bin/csh toor:*:0:0:Bourne-again Superuser:/root: I am running FreeBSD 4.10 as a gateway/router/firewall with IPFW for a small home LAN. I ran ps -aux and looked for any processes owned by toor but didn't find any. Is this something to be concerned about? Sorry if this is an obvious question, but I am still very much a newbie and trying to learn what I can about security. Thanks for your patience, http://www.freebsd.org/doc/faq/security.html#TOOR-ACCOUNT -Radek ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 4.10 Install failure.
Hey Guys, The CD's both have valid data structures (i.e. directories, etc...). I'm positive that I burnt the image correctly, as it's not just an .ISO file and the checksums check out correctly. I checked for the options in the BIOD but they're not there. The BIOS is Compaq Computer Corporation Setup Ultility Any other ideas as to what I might try? Thanks Tyler On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 22:57:24 +0800, Peter Ryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey All, I am havign some trouble installing FreeBSD 4.10 on my PC. I downloaded an ISO image (and verified the checksum) from the Canadian FreeBSD FTP site. After burning the image to CD, I checked the checksums, which were the same. When I put the CD in the drive and attempt to boot from it, I just get a register dump and the computer halts. I have just got over a similar painful learning experience. I made a dumb mistake that might help you. I first just burnt the ISO file to a CD like I would any other file. (I had no idea what an ISO image was :)) After i discovered that you need special software to burn an ISO image, I downloaded the trial version of UltraISO software. It wanted to use Nero Burning ROM to actually do the burn. Once I had these 2 bits of software installed, I could actually use the CD's I burnt. I also burnt CD's of the 2 flp images. I happened to use Sonic Record Now to do that, and there was a button I could press that read the flp image and created a bootable CD. (This was pretty useful because the floppy drive in the PC was unusable) Hope this helps Peter ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Security question - uids of 0
The following appeared in my latest daily security run output: Checking for uids of 0: root 0 toor 0 This is the first time I've seen this message. I checked /etc/passwd and found this: root:*:0:0:Charlie :/root:/bin/csh toor:*:0:0:Bourne-again Superuser:/root: I am running FreeBSD 4.10 as a gateway/router/firewall with IPFW for a small home LAN. I ran ps -aux and looked for any processes owned by toor but didn't find any. Is this something to be concerned about? No. It is normal. It is one of the normal accounts put there in a standard install. It is essentially a root account by another name. Some things used to like to use it to own their installed stuff but avoid using root directly. I don't know if anything really does that any more. I sometimes use it as a model pw entry when in vipw for creating new accounts directly to help avoid missing a field. Sorry if this is an obvious question, but I am still very much a newbie and trying to learn what I can about security. This has been brought up and answered numerous times in the past. You might try and search for information on toor account. You should be able to find something. jerry Thanks for your patience, Jim ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is promiscuous mode bad?
In the last episode (Aug 16), Ruben de Groot said: On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 07:53:10PM -0700, Kevin Stevens typed: A lot of network scanners also trigger on NICS in promiscuous mode (there's a way to detect them, I forget the details at the moment) because admins want to know if any hosts are out there sniffing. How sure are you about that? AFAIK there's no way to detect a NIC in promiscuous mode *from the outside*. I would be very interested in a network scanner that could. The basic points are that since the kernel sees packets it usually doesn't, there may be codepaths that incorrectly process certain packets and send replies. There's also a small delay in processing all those extra packets that might be seen as extra latency in pings etc. As CPUs get faster and kernel bugs get fixed, these become harder and harder to detect. Do a web or usenet search for detect promiscuous mode for lots and lots of links. -- Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 4.10 Install failure.
I am havign some trouble installing FreeBSD 4.10 on my PC. I downloaded an ISO image (and verified the checksum) from the Canadian FreeBSD FTP site. After burning the image to CD, I checked the checksums, which were the same. When I put the CD in the drive and attempt to boot from it, I just get a register dump and the computer halts. I have just got over a similar painful learning experience. I made a dumb mistake that might help you. I first just burnt the ISO file to a CD like I would any other file. (I had no idea what an ISO image was :)) After i discovered that you need special software to burn an ISO image, I downloaded the trial version of UltraISO software. It wanted to use Nero Burning ROM to actually do the burn. Once I had these 2 bits of software installed, I could actually use the CD's I burnt. Unless you have a crippled version of Nero, it will let you burn ISO images. You don't need UltraISO. Just cancel the stupid wizard at startup and choose File/BurnImage from the main Nero window. I also burnt CD's of the 2 flp images. I happened to use Sonic Record Now to do that, and there was a button I could press that read the flp image and created a bootable CD. Also unnecessary. Nero lets you choose CDROM(boot) if you select File/New from the main menu. Just point it to the floppy image you want to burn and you are good to go. Ralph ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 4.10 Install failure.
After reading that, I think it might be possible that I burnt the images correctly, but I simply did not make the CD's bootable. I was using k3b to burn the images, but I might just have a go at it with Nero. Thanks! On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 11:23:08 -0400, Ralph Hempel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am havign some trouble installing FreeBSD 4.10 on my PC. I downloaded an ISO image (and verified the checksum) from the Canadian FreeBSD FTP site. After burning the image to CD, I checked the checksums, which were the same. When I put the CD in the drive and attempt to boot from it, I just get a register dump and the computer halts. I have just got over a similar painful learning experience. I made a dumb mistake that might help you. I first just burnt the ISO file to a CD like I would any other file. (I had no idea what an ISO image was :)) After i discovered that you need special software to burn an ISO image, I downloaded the trial version of UltraISO software. It wanted to use Nero Burning ROM to actually do the burn. Once I had these 2 bits of software installed, I could actually use the CD's I burnt. Unless you have a crippled version of Nero, it will let you burn ISO images. You don't need UltraISO. Just cancel the stupid wizard at startup and choose File/BurnImage from the main Nero window. I also burnt CD's of the 2 flp images. I happened to use Sonic Record Now to do that, and there was a button I could press that read the flp image and created a bootable CD. Also unnecessary. Nero lets you choose CDROM(boot) if you select File/New from the main menu. Just point it to the floppy image you want to burn and you are good to go. Ralph ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 4.10 Install failure.
After reading that, I think it might be possible that I burnt the images correctly, but I simply did not make the CD's bootable. I was using k3b to burn the images, but I might just have a go at it with Nero. Thanks! The CD image that you download from the FreeBSD site is already a bootable ISO. It needs to be written to the CD as a raw file and not converted or processed in any way. It should not be put in a file system on the CD or processed to be bootable, or etc. It is already a complete CD image. jerry On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 11:23:08 -0400, Ralph Hempel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am havign some trouble installing FreeBSD 4.10 on my PC. I downloaded an ISO image (and verified the checksum) from the Canadian FreeBSD FTP site. After burning the image to CD, I checked the checksums, which were the same. When I put the CD in the drive and attempt to boot from it, I just get a register dump and the computer halts. I have just got over a similar painful learning experience. I made a dumb mistake that might help you. I first just burnt the ISO file to a CD like I would any other file. (I had no idea what an ISO image was :)) After i discovered that you need special software to burn an ISO image, I downloaded the trial version of UltraISO software. It wanted to use Nero Burning ROM to actually do the burn. Once I had these 2 bits of software installed, I could actually use the CD's I burnt. Unless you have a crippled version of Nero, it will let you burn ISO images. You don't need UltraISO. Just cancel the stupid wizard at startup and choose File/BurnImage from the main Nero window. I also burnt CD's of the 2 flp images. I happened to use Sonic Record Now to do that, and there was a button I could press that read the flp image and created a bootable CD. Also unnecessary. Nero lets you choose CDROM(boot) if you select File/New from the main menu. Just point it to the floppy image you want to burn and you are good to go. Ralph ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 4.10 Install failure.
Yeah, right after I sent that email I read about the image already being bootable. I supposed I should do my homework before making my posts:) Anyways, the image is burnt correctly, so I'm back to where I started with no idea how to move forward... On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 11:36:47 -0400 (EDT), Jerry McAllister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After reading that, I think it might be possible that I burnt the images correctly, but I simply did not make the CD's bootable. I was using k3b to burn the images, but I might just have a go at it with Nero. Thanks! The CD image that you download from the FreeBSD site is already a bootable ISO. It needs to be written to the CD as a raw file and not converted or processed in any way. It should not be put in a file system on the CD or processed to be bootable, or etc. It is already a complete CD image. jerry On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 11:23:08 -0400, Ralph Hempel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am havign some trouble installing FreeBSD 4.10 on my PC. I downloaded an ISO image (and verified the checksum) from the Canadian FreeBSD FTP site. After burning the image to CD, I checked the checksums, which were the same. When I put the CD in the drive and attempt to boot from it, I just get a register dump and the computer halts. I have just got over a similar painful learning experience. I made a dumb mistake that might help you. I first just burnt the ISO file to a CD like I would any other file. (I had no idea what an ISO image was :)) After i discovered that you need special software to burn an ISO image, I downloaded the trial version of UltraISO software. It wanted to use Nero Burning ROM to actually do the burn. Once I had these 2 bits of software installed, I could actually use the CD's I burnt. Unless you have a crippled version of Nero, it will let you burn ISO images. You don't need UltraISO. Just cancel the stupid wizard at startup and choose File/BurnImage from the main Nero window. I also burnt CD's of the 2 flp images. I happened to use Sonic Record Now to do that, and there was a button I could press that read the flp image and created a bootable CD. Also unnecessary. Nero lets you choose CDROM(boot) if you select File/New from the main menu. Just point it to the floppy image you want to burn and you are good to go. Ralph ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any problems with php 4.3.8_2
Hi, I upgraded the php4 port on this 4.8-RELEASE box to 4.3.8_2. I'm also using apache+mod_ssl-1.3.31+2.8.19. When the lines LoadModule php4_modulelibexec/apache/libphp4.so AddModule mod_php4.c are uncommented, apache segfaults on startup. We're not in a position to upgrade to a newer version of FreeBSD, given that this box is a thousand miles away from us and I, being a novice in many respects, am considered the unquestioned unix/bsd/etc expert in this company (sadly, I wear too many hats for my employers to become genuinely experienced in any one thing). I read in a recent post that installing php5 seems to be something that you install *instead* of mod_php5 and php5-cli. Does the same apply for php4? I ask because I have mod_php4-4.3.8_2,1, php4-4.3.8_2 and php4-cli-4.3.8_2 installed here (as listed in /var/db/pkg, all installed from ports) Has anything simlar to what I've described been reported with newer versions of php? Might I have installed conflicting packages? Any suggestions will be welcomed. :) -- -JC ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to increase scrollback for FreeBSD-4.10?
On 2004-08-16 09:21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 03:09:30PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 06:58:57AM -0700, Mike wrote: When I'm on the 4.10 box the scrollback is about 200 lines. If possible I'd like to set the scroll back to 600 lines or so (at least). Question: How do I increase the scrollback on 4.10? That depends on the console program you're using. For an xterm(1), the following in ~/.Xdefaults will give you 8k scrollback lines: xterm*saveLines:8192 xterm like programs allow the -sl switch lines. I've had problems with numbers approaching 32767 but have never nailed down exactly how many lines I can save. I safely use -sl 3 for xterm, rxvt, aterm, and gnome-terminal. I use screen most of the time in my terminal sessions, which also includes a nice option for scrollback. Putting the following in my ~/.screenrc file works like a charm: defscrollback 1 This is IMHO a bit more preferable than using syscons scrollback, because syscons allocates memory inside the kernel for the scrollback buffer IIRC. I tend to prefer userspace allocations when possible, like the xterm -sl or screen's scrollback. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: root access to ftp, telnet -- CP/M?
Matthew Seaman wrote: Eeek! You do realise you've just sent the root password across your network in plain text? Maybe your network is completely secure and you aren't running a risk by doing that, but on the whole it's a really bad idea. Get into the habit of using ssh(1) routinely for your own peace of mind, if nothing else. You can also replace ftp(1) for many purposes by scp(1) or rsync(1) (from the net/rsync port), both of which operate over ssh(1). Matthew, Thanks for your concern. Once there is anything on the computer, I will certainly close those security holes. Right now it is only a means to learn about FreeBSD and document the steps necessary to build a machine that will fit my needs. I opened ftp and telnet access to root as a simple way to copy files to and from a windows computer and to control the FreeBSD computer from another location. I do plan to implement ssh, but first I must evaluate PuTTY and other alternatives. In the meantime, it is protected from the internet by a hardware router that doesn't forward any ports to the FreeBSD computer. There's so much to learn! This experience with FreeBSD takes me back to my days with CP/M and S-100 bus computers. Maybe if CP/M had been allowed to grow up, rather than be killed by DOS and Windows, it could have become CP/M-BSD? Jay O'Brien Rio Linda, CA USA ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: root access to ftp, telnet -- CP/M?
Jay O'Brien wrote: Matthew Seaman wrote: Eeek! You do realise you've just sent the root password across your network in plain text? Maybe your network is completely secure and you aren't running a risk by doing that, but on the whole it's a really bad idea. Get into the habit of using ssh(1) routinely for your own peace of mind, if nothing else. You can also replace ftp(1) for many purposes by scp(1) or rsync(1) (from the net/rsync port), both of which operate over ssh(1). Matthew, Thanks for your concern. Once there is anything on the computer, I will certainly close those security holes. Right now it is only a means to learn about FreeBSD and document the steps necessary to build a machine that will fit my needs. I opened ftp and telnet access to root as a simple way to copy files to and from a windows computer and to control the FreeBSD computer from another location. I do plan to implement ssh, but first I must evaluate PuTTY and other alternatives. In the meantime, it is protected from the internet by a hardware router that doesn't forward any ports to the FreeBSD computer. There's so much to learn! This experience with FreeBSD takes me back to my days with CP/M and S-100 bus computers. Maybe if CP/M had been allowed to grow up, rather than be killed by DOS and Windows, it could have become CP/M-BSD? Jay O'Brien Rio Linda, CA USA ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I use WinSCP from my Windows boxes to my servers. Enable ssh so that it allows root. It's secure. No need for ftp and telnet. Michael -- Michael D. Whities [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.one-arm.com -- There are four colors of hats to watch for: Black, White, Grey, and Red. The meanings are: Cracker, Hacker, Guru, and Victim. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Any problems with php 4.3.8_2
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 11:47:06AM -0400, John Cholewa wrote: Hi, I upgraded the php4 port on this 4.8-RELEASE box to 4.3.8_2. I'm also using apache+mod_ssl-1.3.31+2.8.19. When the lines LoadModule php4_modulelibexec/apache/libphp4.so AddModule mod_php4.c are uncommented, apache segfaults on startup. We're not in a position to upgrade to a newer version of FreeBSD, given that this box is a thousand miles away from us and I, being a novice in many respects, am considered the unquestioned unix/bsd/etc expert in this company (sadly, I wear too many hats for my employers to become genuinely experienced in any one thing). I read in a recent post that installing php5 seems to be something that you install *instead* of mod_php5 and php5-cli. Does the same apply for php4? I ask because I have mod_php4-4.3.8_2,1, php4-4.3.8_2 and php4-cli-4.3.8_2 installed here (as listed in /var/db/pkg, all installed from ports) Has anything simlar to what I've described been reported with newer versions of php? Might I have installed conflicting packages? Any suggestions will be welcomed. :) Hmmm... well, the structure of the php4 ports parallels the structure of the php5 ports, so yes you are correct that you shouldn't have all of the packages installed simultaneously. If you try and install that combination with an up to date ports tree it will complain: % cd /usr/ports/lang/php4 % make -V CONFLICTS php4-cli-4* mod_php4-4* php4-cgi-4* php5-5* php5-cli-5* mod_php5-5* php5-cgi-5* Unless you've been deliberately ignoring warnings, the only way you can end up with that sort of situation is by updating a system from before the CONFLICTS mechanism was introduced. Since the whole CONFLICTS thing is about not installing ports that all lay claim to various files, the symptom you see of PHP causing apache to segfault could well be a consequence. Another way in which you can get into trouble is to install a php *package* from the FTP sites: the package will have been compiled against the plain non-ssl version of apache, and that is significantly different internally to the mod_ssl version you're using. So long as you compile the php stuff yourself, everything should work OK with whatever version of apache you choose. I suggest that you deinstall all PHP related ports (anything with php or pecl in the name) and start again from scratch just installing the minimum that you need. With the new ports framework it's very easy to add extension modules, should you find that you need to. Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK pgp5L92qHEvAU.pgp Description: PGP signature
RE: root access to ftp, telnet -- CP/M?
Matthew, Thanks for your concern. Once there is anything on the computer, I will certainly close those security holes. Right now it is only a means to learn about FreeBSD and document the steps necessary to build a machine that will fit my needs. I opened ftp and telnet access to root as a simple way to copy files to and from a windows computer and to control the FreeBSD computer from another location. I do plan to implement ssh, but first I must evaluate PuTTY and other alternatives. PuTTY works great! Here's a bit more info on my experience setting up a FreeBSD server and using PuTTY: http://www.hempeldesigngroup.com/embedded/stories/bdgFreeBSDandWindows.html Cheers, Ralph ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_php5 and php5-cli
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Matthew Seaman wrote: On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 07:37:53AM +0200, Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote: Is there some deeper reason why mod_php and php-cli conflict? I have got mod_php5 and apache2 running and would like to enable the php command line interface, too. How can I do this? Install the lang/php5 port which should get you both cli and mod_php5 support together. Make sure that WITH_APACHE2 is set in /etc/make.conf or equivalent so you get apache-2.x support, rather than apache-1.3.x. Great, Thanks! Uli. Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK +---+ |Peter Ulrich Kruppa| | Wuppertal | | Germany | +---+ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 4.10 Install failure.
--- Tyler Parrott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah, right after I sent that email I read about the image already being bootable. I supposed I should do my homework before making my posts:) Anyways, the image is burnt correctly, so I'm back to where I started with no idea how to move forward... snipped stuff ensuring good cd burn, and system unable to boot from cd First off, I have never pretended to know what I am talking about... I am just a random subscriber. Take what I say with a grain of salt. That being out of the way, a quick little comment. You previously mentioned you had a compaq evo (?). Have you tried making bootable floppies and trying them? http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install-pre.html#INSTALL-FLOPPIES Also, have you tried experimenting with your bios settings? Perhaps Advanced, Device options? Specifically the ACPI settings... (I kinda doubt this will have any effect, however). Was the error similar to the following? (after loading bootstrap loader) | int=000d err= efl=00030246 eip=3034 eax=205d ebx=0004 ecx=2000 edx=288c esi=08d5 edi=0006290c ebp=1538 esp=1502 cs=f000 ds=ee00 es=ee00 fs= gs= ss=ee00 cs:eip=0f 20 dd 81 e5 00 f0 0f-20 c2 0f 01 e0 a8 01 75 08 80 e2 fe e8 53 ff eb-21 0f 20 e0 a9 30 00 75 ss:esp=0c 29 06 00 d5 08 00 00-38 15 00 00 22 15 00 00 04 00 00 00 8c 28 00 00-04 00 00 00 5d 28 00 00 BTX halted Hopefully someone who knows more than I (accounts for pretty much everyone on this list...) comprehends what this means. I'm without clue. Hth, and good luck. __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail is new and improved - Check it out! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ipfw2 or ipfilter
Hi! I'm looking into if I should go with ipfw2 or ipfilter, anyone that could point me to some links or tell me pro's and con's (both feature and performance wise). Kind Regards, Stefan Cars -- Stefan Cars Snowfall Communications http://www.snowfall.se Tel: +46 (0)18 430 80 50 - Direct: +46 (0)18 430 80 51 Mobile: +46 (0)708 44 36 00 - Fax: +46 (0)708 44 36 04 ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dell 400sc scsi and 4.10 install
Hi, I've seen this topic come up in the lists recently but I haven't seen a solution for it. I'm trying to install 4.10 on a new 400SC. When I boot I see: HBA ID LUN Vendor 0 0 0 Fugitsu 36422MB 0 7 0 LSILogic 1020/1030 1 7 0 LSILogic 1020/2030 I'm able to partition the 36G drive but then the install (floppy - network) hangs when creating the file systems. Unable to make new root filesystem on /dev/da0s1a Command returned status 36 BIOS options for drive configurations: SATA Primary off/auto, primary master off/auto, ide drive udama off/auto. I would appreciate any help at all. Thanks. Jeanne ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: dell 400sc scsi and 4.10 install
Hi, I've seen this topic come up in the lists recently but I haven't seen a solution for it. I'm trying to install 4.10 on a new 400SC. When I boot I see: HBA ID LUN Vendor 0 0 0 Fugitsu 36422MB 0 7 0 LSILogic 1020/1030 1 7 0 LSILogic 1020/2030 I'm able to partition the 36G drive but then the install (floppy - network) hangs when creating the file systems. Unable to make new root filesystem on /dev/da0s1a Command returned status 36 BIOS options for drive configurations: SATA Primary off/auto, primary master off/auto, ide drive udama off/auto. We had one site with nearly the same stuff (Dell 400, etc and a controller that seemed to be SATA) and the same result. We could not install on it and the site admin finally replaced the controller with a plain SCSI and was able to install with no problem. Note that it appeared to slice (fdisk) and make partitiona (disklabel) and these showed up on future attempts so it seemed to be able to write the label. But, it was completely unable to write anything more than that. The newfs failed as you see. So, no help, but just some support for your experience - unless recommending switching to a SCSI controller is considered help. I posted to the list at that time and had a couple inquiries, but no-one seemed to have any workable suggestions. I am guessing that the driver support is incomplete for that setup, but don't know enough to pinpoint it. jerry I would appreciate any help at all. Thanks. Jeanne ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 4.10 Install failure.
Thanks for all the advice, it is much appreciated. I'll give the floppies a try. That error that you pasted is pretty much exactly what I get, although I'm not sure whether or not the register values are the same:) Again, I'll try with the floppies:) Thanks! On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 09:46:05 -0700 (PDT), K. Greenwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- Tyler Parrott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah, right after I sent that email I read about the image already being bootable. I supposed I should do my homework before making my posts:) Anyways, the image is burnt correctly, so I'm back to where I started with no idea how to move forward... snipped stuff ensuring good cd burn, and system unable to boot from cd First off, I have never pretended to know what I am talking about... I am just a random subscriber. Take what I say with a grain of salt. That being out of the way, a quick little comment. You previously mentioned you had a compaq evo (?). Have you tried making bootable floppies and trying them? http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install-pre.html#INSTALL-FLOPPIES Also, have you tried experimenting with your bios settings? Perhaps Advanced, Device options? Specifically the ACPI settings... (I kinda doubt this will have any effect, however). Was the error similar to the following? (after loading bootstrap loader) | int=000d err= efl=00030246 eip=3034 eax=205d ebx=0004 ecx=2000 edx=288c esi=08d5 edi=0006290c ebp=1538 esp=1502 cs=f000 ds=ee00 es=ee00 fs= gs= ss=ee00 cs:eip=0f 20 dd 81 e5 00 f0 0f-20 c2 0f 01 e0 a8 01 75 08 80 e2 fe e8 53 ff eb-21 0f 20 e0 a9 30 00 75 ss:esp=0c 29 06 00 d5 08 00 00-38 15 00 00 22 15 00 00 04 00 00 00 8c 28 00 00-04 00 00 00 5d 28 00 00 BTX halted Hopefully someone who knows more than I (accounts for pretty much everyone on this list...) comprehends what this means. I'm without clue. Hth, and good luck. __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail is new and improved - Check it out! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 4.10 Install failure.
At 10:43 8/16/2004, Tyler Parrott, wrote: Yeah, right after I sent that email I read about the image already being bootable. I supposed I should do my homework before making my posts:) Anyways, the image is burnt correctly, so I'm back to where I started with no idea how to move forward... On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 11:36:47 -0400 (EDT), Jerry McAllister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After reading that, I think it might be possible that I burnt the images correctly, but I simply did not make the CD's bootable. I was using k3b to burn the images, but I might just have a go at it with Nero. Thanks! The CD image that you download from the FreeBSD site is already a bootable ISO. It needs to be written to the CD as a raw file and not converted or processed in any way. It should not be put in a file system on the CD or processed to be bootable, or etc. It is already a complete CD image. jerry Try your 4.10 CD on a different computer? Burn a 4.9 CD? Start Here to Find It Fast! - http://www.US-Webmasters.com/best-start-page/ $8.77 Domain Names - http://domains.us-webmasters.com/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ipfw2 or ipfilter
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 06:46:23PM +0200, Stefan Cars wrote: I'm looking into if I should go with ipfw2 or ipfilter, anyone that could point me to some links or tell me pro's and con's (both feature and performance wise). Unless your running quite a complicated setup or have specific requirements then there isn't really any preference for one over the other. If you're running a typical home system, even with say, a 10Mbit/s cable modem connection, any reasonably modern FreeBSD machine is going to be able to do firewall filtering without breaking into a sweat. You'ld need so quite fancy hardware to detect performance differences between the two. Probably the biggest reason to choose one over the other is simple personal preference between the different rule-set styles. ipfw is 'first match wins' (hence rule sets tend to be ordered from most to least specific). ipfilter is 'last match wins', so the most general rules tend to go at the top of rulesets -- although there are special 'quick' rules that can shortcut the process. In general both firewalls have very similar functionality. ipfw(8) can act as a filtering bridge and it can provide weighted fair queuing and bandwidth limited pipes in conjunction with dummynet(4). ipfilter seems to have more complete IPv6 support than ip6fw. Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK pgpqIxTh2d78B.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Security question - uids of 0
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 05:01:51PM +0200, Volker Kindermann wrote: Hi James, The following appeared in my latest daily security run output: Checking for uids of 0: root 0 toor 0 This is the first time I've seen this message. I checked /etc/passwd and found this: root:*:0:0:Charlie :/root:/bin/csh toor:*:0:0:Bourne-again Superuser:/root: I am running FreeBSD 4.10 as a gateway/router/firewall with IPFW for a small home LAN. I ran ps -aux and looked for any processes owned by toor but didn't find any. did you install bash? Normally, the bash from ports or packages will install the toor account so you don't have to change root's shell. If you installed bash then there's nothing to worry about this entry. If you don't need it, just use vipw and delete it. -volker Thank you Volker - I did install bash several weeks ago, so the sudden appearance of the message in my daily security run caught my attention. Thanks to everyone who sent the http://www.freebsd.org/doc/faq/security.html#TOOR-ACCOUNT link. Jim ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: dell 400sc scsi and 4.10 install
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 13:07:17 -0400 (EDT) Jerry McAllister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I've seen this topic come up in the lists recently but I haven't seen a solution for it. I'm trying to install 4.10 on a new 400SC. When I boot I see: HBA ID LUN Vendor 0 0 0 Fugitsu 36422MB 0 7 0 LSILogic 1020/1030 1 7 0 LSILogic 1020/2030 I'm able to partition the 36G drive but then the install (floppy - network) hangs when creating the file systems. Unable to make new root filesystem on /dev/da0s1a Command returned status 36 BIOS options for drive configurations: SATA Primary off/auto, primary master off/auto, ide drive udama off/auto. We had one site with nearly the same stuff (Dell 400, etc and a controller that seemed to be SATA) and the same result. We could not install on it and the site admin finally replaced the controller with a plain SCSI and was able to install with no problem. Jerry - thanks for the response. I did see your comments on the situation you describe below, sorry that you had to say the same thing twice. But I was/am confused, because I'm not using SATA. I am using the LSILogic scsi controller card. Am I correct in understanding that the LSILogic Ultra320 scsi controller is not supported in FreeBSD? Sorry for the confusion. This is the first trouble I've ever had with a Dell (IDE or SCSI). Can anyone confirm that the lsilogic ultra320 scsi controller just wont work at all, or just won't work in 4.10. Is there maybe some way to emulate an adaptec card or something like that? (I'm pushing for more help because I've got a deadline for putting a machine in production and shipping this back will really cause a delay). Thanks again for any help, Jeanne Note that it appeared to slice (fdisk) and make partitiona (disklabel) and these showed up on future attempts so it seemed to be able to write the label. But, it was completely unable to write anything more than that. The newfs failed as you see. So, no help, but just some support for your experience - unless recommending switching to a SCSI controller is considered help. I posted to the list at that time and had a couple inquiries, but no-one seemed to have any workable suggestions. I am guessing that the driver support is incomplete for that setup, but don't know enough to pinpoint it. jerry I would appreciate any help at all. Thanks. Jeanne ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to increase scrollback for FreeBSD-4.10?
Giorgos Keramidas wrote: On 2004-08-16 09:21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 03:09:30PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 06:58:57AM -0700, Mike wrote: When I'm on the 4.10 box the scrollback is about 200 lines. If possible I'd like to set the scroll back to 600 lines or so (at least). Question: How do I increase the scrollback on 4.10? That depends on the console program you're using. For an xterm(1), the following in ~/.Xdefaults will give you 8k scrollback lines: xterm*saveLines:8192 xterm like programs allow the -sl switch lines. I've had problems with numbers approaching 32767 but have never nailed down exactly how many lines I can save. I safely use -sl 3 for xterm, rxvt, aterm, and gnome-terminal. I use screen most of the time in my terminal sessions, which also includes a nice option for scrollback. Putting the following in my ~/.screenrc file works like a charm: defscrollback 1 This is IMHO a bit more preferable than using syscons scrollback, because syscons allocates memory inside the kernel for the scrollback buffer IIRC. I tend to prefer userspace allocations when possible, like the xterm -sl or screen's scrollback. Greetings: Thank you for the tips!!! I went and tried this using this kdbcontrol command in my .cshrc: # added to increase scrollback to 1000 /usr/sbin/kbdcontrol -h 1000 This gave me 1,000 lines when I'm logged into the console however, it resulted in a Inapproriate ioctrl for device error when using xterm (xfterm4) under xfce4. So I removed the kdbcontrol from my .cshrc and used a -sl 3000 option to launch xfterm4. So launching xfterm4 -sl 3000 now does the trick! Regards, Michael ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xãnax Here
!-- pancake manure refrain dr approbation gather wherewithal yeshiva candela comfort cabana ignominious mcgovern dysplasia wreath charge behold averse clothesmen gustafson ottoman precinct haberdashery purport snider affinity lacquer creepy bouffant doze abridgment mercilessly annoyance !-- ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ProFTPd: 229 Entering Extended Passive Mode
I am running the latest port version of ProFTPd on one of my servers but it seems to hang for as long as 60 seconds whenever I attempt to transfer data. The cmd line says 229 Entering Extended Passive Mode and then hangs. Eventually it does work, but it greatly impedes my coding efforts. What is odd is that this does *not* occur when I access an identical ProFTPd installation on another machine. Does anybody know what might cause this sort of excessive delay and how maybe to repair it? Thank you, as always, for your time and assistance. -- Aaron Dalton http://aaron.daltons.ca ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My Atheros WIFI adapter
Supposedly, the Atheros 5212 chipset supports both 11.a/b/g, but for some reason 'ifconfig -m' does not return any modes for the 11b network (which I am currently trying to stay connected to). bumbaldi# dmesg |grep ath0 ath0: Atheros 5212 mem 0xed80-0xed80 irq 16 at device 13.0 on pci0 ath0: mac 5.6 phy 4.1 5ghz radio 1.7 2ghz radio 2.3 ath0: 11a rates: 6Mbps 9Mbps 12Mbps 18Mbps 24Mbps 36Mbps 48Mbps 54Mbps ath0: 11g rates: 1Mbps 2Mbps 5.5Mbps 11Mbps 6Mbps 9Mbps 12Mbps 18Mbps 24Mbps 36Mbps 48Mbps 54Mbps ath0: turbo rates: 6Mbps 9Mbps 12Mbps 18Mbps 24Mbps 36Mbps 48Mbps 54Mbps ath0: 802.11 address: 00:20:a6:4f:93:77 Nor does the dmesg as you can see. I am using FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE and I have just rebuild world and installed a new kernel, still nothing works. Does anyone know why this happens? This is causing me allot of problems, I cannot connect to the router properly because the card randomly looses carrier and I - of course - loose connectivity. Very irritating, because I often disconnect from IRC, slow download etc. Regards, Fridrik Bragi Dyrfjord ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: dell 400sc scsi and 4.10 install
On Aug 16, 2004, at 12:34 PM, Jeanne wrote: Jerry - thanks for the response. I did see your comments on the situation you describe below, sorry that you had to say the same thing twice. But I was/am confused, because I'm not using SATA. I am using the LSILogic scsi controller card. Am I correct in understanding that the LSILogic Ultra320 scsi controller is not supported in FreeBSD? Sorry for the confusion. This is the first trouble I've ever had with a Dell (IDE or SCSI). Can anyone confirm that the lsilogic ultra320 scsi controller just wont work at all, or just won't work in 4.10. Is there maybe some way to emulate an adaptec card or something like that? The mpt(4) driver in 5.2.1 (thats what I have, guessing its pretty much the same for your 4.10) says it supports the 53c1030 Dual Ultra320 SCSI. Also says it first appeared in FreeBSD 4.6. I don't have this SCSI adapter. As for SATA on the 400SC, the MB SATA interface works fine for me in 5.2.1-p9 altho its installed on PATA, SATA only has data. Don't believe I noticed how much memory your system has. The Dell BIOS has an OS installation mode which greatly truncates the amount of memory appearing in the system. For all I know that might prevent mpt(4) from operating reliably. F2 after boot and check which state this BIOS setting is using. What the heck? Try it the other way. I am having problems with my 400SC failing to reboot. With ACPI enabled dmesg output appears cleaner than without but shutdown -r now appears to go all the way down to BIOS but doesn't turn around and come back up. At least it doesn't now, but did the first few days I was beating on the machine to make sure it was suitable. Seems to have happened when the Seagate 40G PATA drive was replaced with a Hitachi 120G PATA drive. Swapping back to the Seagate didn't fix the problem. -- David Kelly N4HHE, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Top posters will not be shown the honor of a reply. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Frequent crashes with Mozilla and Firefox
In the last few weeks ive started getting a number of crashes using either Mozilla or Firefox. im using the newest version of each from Ports, on FreeBSD 4.9. It typically happens when i visit a complicated website with lots of dynamically-generated content, like the N.Y. Times or eBay. But its not regular; i can restart the browser and go back to the same page and it could then just work. There isnt anything useful in the logs, at least, /var/log/messages sometimes has a core dump, and sometimes has nothing, but it never has anything detailed. Sorry to be nonspecific but i cant seem to figure out a good pattern, other than a complicated webpage. Also im not sure what i changed when it first started. But i am fully up to date. Thanks for your help! Jen __ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: dell 400sc scsi and 4.10 install
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 13:51:19 -0500 David Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The mpt(4) driver in 5.2.1 (thats what I have, guessing its pretty much the same for your 4.10) says it supports the 53c1030 Dual Ultra320 SCSI. Also says it first appeared in FreeBSD 4.6. I don't have this SCSI adapter. The dell BIOS is mpt boot ROM. sysinstall boot shows: mpt0:LSILogic 1030 Ultra4 adapter ...irq10 at device 1.0 on pci2 mpt1:LSILogic 1030 Ultra4 adapter ...irq10 at device 1.1 on pci2 pci2:unknown card at 12.0 irq9 da0 at mpt1 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0 Fugitsu.. Fixed direct acess SCSI-3 device This level of hardware troubleshooting leaves me scratching my head. Does it seem that the mpt driver is working correctly? And of course I get the same errors that Jerry was getting, |write error: 128 |newfs: wtfs - writecombine - Input/output error Well unless some good hardware folks can suggest a fix I'm going to either have to ship this back or just throw an ide hardrive in it and put the lsi controller in the spare parts box. At least there is some good documentation on it in the archives if someone does a search on 400SC and freebsd before they make a purchase. Thanks for all the help. Cheers, Jeanne Don't believe I noticed how much memory your system has. The Dell BIOS has an OS installation mode which greatly truncates the amount of memory appearing in the system. For all I know that might prevent mpt(4) from operating reliably. F2 after boot and check which state this BIOS setting is using. What the heck? Try it the other way. The BIOS shows that I have a full 512MB. I am having problems with my 400SC failing to reboot. With ACPI enabled dmesg output appears cleaner than without but shutdown -r now appears to go all the way down to BIOS but doesn't turn around and come back up. At least it doesn't now, but did the first few days I was beating on the machine to make sure it was suitable. Seems to have happened when the Seagate 40G PATA drive was replaced with a Hitachi 120G PATA drive. Swapping back to the Seagate didn't fix the problem. -- David Kelly N4HHE, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Top posters will not be shown the honor of a reply. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PCI ADSL Modems
I was wondering what PCI modems FreeBSD supports. I have followed the hardware link on the web site but could not find a supplier to the UK. I was wondering if the ADSL PCI Conexant Chipset was supported. I would be grateful for any information on this matter. Gary Edwards ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[no subject]
Hi all Just a quick question, as it was posted on the list nvidia has released some new drivers, i've yet to try these drivers but at the moment im having to use -CURRENT to be able to get the previous release to work properly and they did very well. I rebuilt my world/kernel with -CURRENT and then my software, xorg, gnome 2.6 etc. My questions is, everything ive compiled was with gcc 3.4.x thats in -CURRENT if i downgrade to 5.2.1 Release will this cause any problems with the software i compiled with the newer gcc. Reasons being for changing as i dont like being that much on the bleeding edge as im just a user not a developer, saying that thou these new drivers might not work out for me and i may end up going back to -CURRENT, as i had the libpthread libr_c problem and had to map them with libmap.conf Anyway any opinions please as im going to do this tonight and if it means it will screw things up i might just reinstall. Thanks Again Glyn -- *-* | Glyn Tebbutt |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | |--' http://homepage.ntlworld.com/d3c3it | |Lisa, if you dont like your job you dont strike, | | You just go in everyday and do it really half-assed | | Thats the American way. -Homer Simpson | *-* ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Frequent crashes with Mozilla and Firefox
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 12:51:36PM -0700, Your Name wrote: In the last few weeks ive started getting a number of crashes using either Mozilla or Firefox. im using the newest version of each from Ports, on FreeBSD 4.9. And on 5.2.1-RELEASE and 5.2-CURRENT It typically happens when i visit a complicated website with lots of dynamically-generated content, like the N.Y. Times or eBay. But its not regular; i can restart the browser and go back to the same page and it could then just work. Two sites that failed consistently for me were http://www.pga.com and http://www.statefarm.com The browser versions are Mozilla 1.7.2 Mozilla Firefox 0.9.3 Both versions were built from ports the day after the port was committed. All other ports are up-to-date. -- Regards, Doug ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: find -exec surprisingly slow
--On Monday, August 16, 2004 21:37:13 +0930 Paul A. Hoadley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 02:22:02PM -0700, Pat Lashley wrote: Just FYI, Exim, with the ExiScan patches, can reject at SMTP time; and also has a 'fakereject' capability which tells the sender that the message has been rejected; but actually delivers it. Thanks for the info. I have been thinking of changing MTAs for a while. I've been using Exim for years now, and in several widly varying installations. I can heartily recommend it as solid, flexable, and capable. And the config file is actually pretty easy to read even in complex or highly customized configurations. (Unlike a certain ancient but still inexplicably popular MTA...) The FreeBSD port automatically includes the semi-official ExiScan patchest which adds the ability to do SpamAssassin and anti-virus scanning while the SMTP connection is still open. The Exim mailing list has a pretty high signal-to-noise ratio; and the folks on it tend to be friendly and helpful. And there's very good on-line documentation at http://www.exim.org/ -Pat ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
firewire pseudo-hotplug
Hello, Is there any way to make a shell script execute immediately after a firewire device is plugged in? The man pages and mailing list archives didn't even get me close to a hint of whether this is possible or not. Failing that, is there a (good) way to tell from the command line whether a particular device (say, a hard disk) happens to be plugged in or not? Thanks in advance for your time. -- Charles Ulrich System Administrator Ideal Solution - http://www.idealso.com ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ProFTPd: 229 Entering Extended Passive Mode
As a follow-up, this happens even if I replace ProFTPd with the built-in ftpd via inetd. How do I eliminate this delay? Cheers! -- Aaron Dalton http://aaron.daltons.ca ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is promiscuous mode bad?
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 14:24:00 +0200 Ruben de Groot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 07:53:10PM -0700, Kevin Stevens typed: A lot of network scanners also trigger on NICS in promiscuous mode (there's a way to detect them, I forget the details at the moment) because admins want to know if any hosts are out there sniffing. How sure are you about that? AFAIK there's no way to detect a NIC in promiscuous mode *from the outside*. I would be very interested in a network scanner that could. Ruben ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ping it with wrong mac. horio shoichi ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help me ObwanKnobi your my only hope.
I have spent many usless hours looking at Freebsd.org, google.com and yahoo.com in an attempt to find a ftpd that I can cap / choke the outgoing bandwith. Do you know of any such animals? Reading the man pages for ftpd is like trying to read and understand Klingon. Thanks DS ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Frequent crashes with Mozilla and Firefox
On Monday 16 August 2004 01:31 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 12:51:36PM -0700, Your Name wrote: In the last few weeks ive started getting a number of crashes using either Mozilla or Firefox. im using the newest version of each from Ports, on FreeBSD 4.9. And on 5.2.1-RELEASE and 5.2-CURRENT It typically happens when i visit a complicated website with lots of dynamically-generated content, like the N.Y. Times or eBay. But its not regular; i can restart the browser and go back to the same page and it could then just work. Two sites that failed consistently for me were http://www.pga.com and http://www.statefarm.com The browser versions are Mozilla 1.7.2 Mozilla Firefox 0.9.3 Both versions were built from ports the day after the port was committed. All other ports are up-to-date. I don't know if this would be helpful, but I'm testing both sites at the same time (tabbed) with Mozilla and Firefox, and I'm not having problems - am clicking through many links with both browsers fetching on both tabs (and Mozilla also has other tabs open). I'm running 5.2.1-RELEASE-p9 and have the same versions of Mozilla and Firefox as you do, and all my ports are also up-to-date. Both browsers have Flash, Java and scripting enabled. If it means anything, I'm also running X.org and Xfce4. However, the OP it was an intermittent problem (is it with you as well?), so not sure if I'm just getting lucky, as I haven't ever surfed either of those sites before. - jt ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Frequent crashes with Mozilla and Firefox
On Monday 16 August 2004 02:30 pm, Joshua Tinnin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday 16 August 2004 01:31 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 12:51:36PM -0700, Your Name wrote: In the last few weeks ive started getting a number of crashes using either Mozilla or Firefox. im using the newest version of each from Ports, on FreeBSD 4.9. And on 5.2.1-RELEASE and 5.2-CURRENT It typically happens when i visit a complicated website with lots of dynamically-generated content, like the N.Y. Times or eBay. But its not regular; i can restart the browser and go back to the same page and it could then just work. Two sites that failed consistently for me were http://www.pga.com and http://www.statefarm.com The browser versions are Mozilla 1.7.2 Mozilla Firefox 0.9.3 Both versions were built from ports the day after the port was committed. All other ports are up-to-date. I don't know if this would be helpful, but I'm testing both sites at the same time (tabbed) with Mozilla and Firefox, and I'm not having problems - am clicking through many links with both browsers fetching on both tabs (and Mozilla also has other tabs open). I'm running 5.2.1-RELEASE-p9 and have the same versions of Mozilla and Firefox as you do, and all my ports are also up-to-date. Both browsers have Flash, Java and scripting enabled. If it means anything, I'm also running X.org and Xfce4. However, the OP it was an intermittent problem (is it with you as well?), so not sure if I'm just getting lucky, as I haven't ever surfed either of those sites before. I should probably also mention that neither browser has ever crashed on me on FreeBSD, and I use both extensively. I've only been a FreeBSD user for a few months, but I've never had issues with either browser crashing whatsoever. I'm also running on a 2GHz Athlon and 512MB RAM. Mozilla tends to be a memory hog - maybe it's an issue with memory and swapping? - jt ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Frequent crashes with Mozilla and Firefox
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 03:31:22PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 12:51:36PM -0700, Your Name wrote: In the last few weeks ive started getting a number of crashes using either Mozilla or Firefox. im using the newest version of each from Ports, on FreeBSD 4.9. And on 5.2.1-RELEASE and 5.2-CURRENT I'm having the problem too. Been having it for months always with the latest firefox builds. Are you guys running it under gnome? The console messages it logs when it quits out (sorry I don't have them available anymore) made me think it might be gnome+firefox specific. dan ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
difficulties building gcc from ports collection
uname -a FreeBSD test21.eng 4.7-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE #0: Fri Dec 6 13:38:10 PST 2002 root@:/usr/src/sys/compile/350-GODSPEED-4.7 i386 I've been trying to build a documentation package called synopsis ( http://synopsis.fresco.org/index.html ). It requires gcc 3.x. I have gcc version 2.95.4 20020320 [FreeBSD] So, of course, I cd'd to /usr/ports/lang to build a later version of gcc. I tried gcc33 first (to no success) and then gcc32 (different errors): cd /usr/ports/lang/ gcc33 sudo make install Making GCC 3.2 for FreeBSD 4.7 elf target i386-portbld-freebsd4.7 Attempting to CVS checkout from :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/gcc. cvs [checkout aborted]: connect to subversions.gnu.org(199.232.41.3):2401 failed: Operation timed out Couldn't CVS checkout gcc-3.2_20020518. Please try again later. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/gcc33. cd ../gcc32 sudo make install Making GCC 3.2 for FreeBSD 4.7 elf target i386-portbld-freebsd4.7 port_gcc32_2002-09-02.diff doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. Attempting to fetch from ftp://relay.nuxi.com/obrien/. fetch: port_gcc32_2002-09-02.diff: Undefined error: 0 Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/. fetch: port_gcc32_2002-09-02.diff: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) Couldn't fetch it - please try to retrieve this port manually into /usr/ports/distfiles/ and try again. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/gcc32. then I tried gcc31 - I get a lot further... but I get a lot of warnings: ../../gcc-3.1.1/gcc/combine.c:10573: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned still, it did eventually build and (with nudging) install. Have people built 3.2? Should I worry about the errors building 3.1? -- - V. Vicki Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jabber: vlbrown Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Internal Documentation: Review, Edit, (Re)Write - Overviews, Specs, Web Pages, Process Descriptions About: http://www.cfcl.com/vlb/Jobweb Demo: http://catnip.ironport.com/~vlbrown/ (pointers to recent work) ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Frequent crashes with Mozilla and Firefox
On Monday 16 August 2004 04:38 pm, Dan Rue wrote: On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 03:31:22PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 12:51:36PM -0700, Your Name wrote: In the last few weeks ive started getting a number of crashes using either Mozilla or Firefox. im using the newest version of each from Ports, on FreeBSD 4.9. And on 5.2.1-RELEASE and 5.2-CURRENT I'm having the problem too. Been having it for months always with the latest firefox builds. Are you guys running it under gnome? The console messages it logs when it quits out (sorry I don't have them available anymore) made me think it might be gnome+firefox specific. dan I've been having crashes with Mozilla running in KDE on FreeBSD 4.10 with Java and Flash plugin support. Andrew Gould ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gimp port broke?
I'm running 4.10-STABLE. Here's my uname output: [EMAIL PROTECTED](p0)/usr/ports/graphics/gimp 115% uname -a FreeBSD lightning.StevenFriedrich.org 4.10-STABLE FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE #49: Tue Aug 10 23:10:38 EDT 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/LIGHTNING i386 Here's the error: /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.5: undefined reference to `pthread_equal' /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.5: undefined reference to `pthread_once' gmake[3]: *** [svg] Error 1 The log of the port build is 1.1MB and will be sent upon request. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help me ObwanKnobi your my only hope.
Taken from the vsftpd website FAQ: Q) Help! Does vsftpd support bandwidth limiting? A) Yes. See vsftpd.conf.5 man page and investigate settings such as anon_max_rate and local_max_rate. (That is, install vsftpd and run man 5 vsftpd.conf. Alternately, read the HTML version at http://tinyurl.com/5qnd5 .) Never tried this myself, but I've heard good things about vsftpd in general. Evan Eusey On Monday 16 August 2004 05:11 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have spent many usless hours looking at Freebsd.org, google.com and yahoo.com in an attempt to find a ftpd that I can cap / choke the outgoing bandwith. Do you know of any such animals? Reading the man pages for ftpd is like trying to read and understand Klingon. Thanks DS ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Application level inspection - firewall?
Quick question, is there an Application Level firewall available to FreeBSD. I understand IPFilter is a stateful packet filter, but has it or any other packages moved to the next level - Application Level Inspection? Sorry I am all googled out on this one. Thanks Paul ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help me ObwanKnobi your my only hope.
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 02:11:14PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have spent many usless hours looking at Freebsd.org, google.com and yahoo.com in an attempt to find a ftpd that I can cap / choke the outgoing bandwith. Do you know of any such animals? dummynet(4) will probably do what you want unless you need to do it per user. -- Brooks -- Any statement of the form X is the one, true Y is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 pgp2rIt0aqwHx.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Help me ObwanKnobi your my only hope.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have spent many usless hours looking at Freebsd.org, google.com and yahoo.com in an attempt to find a ftpd that I can cap / choke the outgoing bandwith. Do you know of any such animals? No. But look at the bandwidth shaping capabilities of IPFW. It _can_ do what you want. Reading the man pages for ftpd is like trying to read and understand Klingon. I disagree. I think the ftpd manual page is very clear and to the point. Is English your native language? -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help me ObwanKnobi your my only hope.
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 14:11:14 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have spent many usless hours looking at Freebsd.org, google.com and yahoo.com in an attempt to find a ftpd that I can cap / choke the outgoing bandwith. This is generally not an ftp daemon function. Bandwidth limiting may be done through a firewall. -- David Benfell, LCP [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Resume available at http://www.parts-unknown.org/resume.html ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Application level inspection - firewall?
Paul Hillen wrote: Quick question, is there an Application Level firewall available to FreeBSD. For some definitions of that buzzword, sure. I understand IPFilter is a stateful packet filter, but has it or any other packages moved to the next level - Application Level Inspection? Squid plus a firewall which blocks or redirects port 80 will serve for HTTP; Postfix or Qmail or whatever plus firewall rules which do the same for port 25 serve as application-level filtering for SMTP (enough to protect that Exchange server some people want to run), etc. -- -Chuck ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[OT] Security hole in PuTTY (Windows ssh client)
Hello, Sorry for the completely OT post, but I saw two mentions of PuTTY in one day on the list and assume it must be a popular piece of Windows software. The SANS Institute @Risk newsletter dated 8AUG04 contains the following item regarding PuTTY: 04.31.4 CVE: Not Available Platform: Third Party Windows Apps Title: PuTTY Remote Buffer Overflow Description: PuTTY is a free Telnet and SSH client. It has been reported that PuTTY is subject to a pre-authentication buffer overflow that can allow malicious servers to execute code on a client machine as it attempts to negotiate connection. PuTTY 0.54 and previous versions are vulnerable. Ref: http://www.coresecurity.com/common/showdoc.php?idx=417idxseccion=10 Again, sorry for the OT post, but it seems (at least) very marginally relevant to some. We now return you regularly scheduled program of FBSD Regards, Stheg __ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Gimp port broke?
Don't mean to steal your spot light but here's the errors I got this morning when trying to build: In file included from /usr/local/include/libwmf/types.h:26, from /usr/local/include/libwmf/api.h:25, from wmf.c:33: /usr/local/include/freetype2/freetype/freetype.h:20:2: #error `ft2build.h' hasn't been included yet! /usr/local/include/freetype2/freetype/freetype.h:21:2: #error Please always use macros to include FreeType header files. /usr/local/include/freetype2/freetype/freetype.h:22:2: #error Example: /usr/local/include/freetype2/freetype/freetype.h:23:2: #error #include ft2build.h /usr/local/include/freetype2/freetype/freetype.h:24:2: #error #include FT_FREETYPE_H gmake[3]: *** [wmf.o] Error 1 gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/graphics/gimp/work/gimp-2.0.4/plug-ins/common' gmake[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/graphics/gimp/work/gimp-2.0.4/plug-ins' gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/graphics/gimp/work/gimp-2.0.4' gmake: *** [all] Error 2 *** Error code 2 On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 18:17:41 -0400, Steven Friedrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm running 4.10-STABLE. Here's my uname output: [EMAIL PROTECTED](p0)/usr/ports/graphics/gimp 115% uname -a FreeBSD lightning.StevenFriedrich.org 4.10-STABLE FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE #49: Tue Aug 10 23:10:38 EDT 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/LIGHTNING i386 Here's the error: /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.5: undefined reference to `pthread_equal' /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.5: undefined reference to `pthread_once' gmake[3]: *** [svg] Error 1 The log of the port build is 1.1MB and will be sent upon request. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD search question
I'm using the FreeBSD search at the bottom of the home page. I searched for libc_r and I got pages that don't have that in them. Why? Is the underscore a problem? Also, is there anyway to limit hits to a particular language? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [OT] Security hole in PuTTY (Windows ssh client)
stheg olloydson wrote: Hello, Sorry for the completely OT post, but I saw two mentions of PuTTY in one day on the list and assume it must be a popular piece of Windows software. The SANS Institute @Risk newsletter dated 8AUG04 contains the following item regarding PuTTY: 04.31.4 CVE: Not Available Platform: Third Party Windows Apps Title: PuTTY Remote Buffer Overflow Description: PuTTY is a free Telnet and SSH client. It has been reported that PuTTY is subject to a pre-authentication buffer overflow that can allow malicious servers to execute code on a client machine as it attempts to negotiate connection. PuTTY 0.54 and previous versions are vulnerable. Ref: http://www.coresecurity.com/common/showdoc.php?idx=417idxseccion=10 Again, sorry for the OT post, but it seems (at least) very marginally relevant to some. We now return you regularly scheduled program of FBSD Regards, Stheg I think what you are saying is that if you use PuTTY as a client application that you should be concerned about what server you connect to? From what you are saying, I suspect that if the only use is to connect to your own (FreeBSD) server, you are probably ok? Jay O'Brien ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [OT] Security hole in PuTTY (Windows ssh client)
On Monday 16 August 2004 03:52 pm, stheg olloydson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Sorry for the completely OT post, but I saw two mentions of PuTTY in one day on the list and assume it must be a popular piece of Windows software. It is written for *nix and win32, and it has an MIT license. The SANS Institute @Risk newsletter dated 8AUG04 contains the following item regarding PuTTY: 04.31.4 CVE: Not Available Platform: Third Party Windows Apps Title: PuTTY Remote Buffer Overflow Description: PuTTY is a free Telnet and SSH client. It has been reported that PuTTY is subject to a pre-authentication buffer overflow that can allow malicious servers to execute code on a client machine as it attempts to negotiate connection. PuTTY 0.54 and previous versions are vulnerable. Ref: http://www.coresecurity.com/common/showdoc.php?idx=417idxseccion=10 You forgot to include this (from the link above): *Solution/Vendor Information/Workaround:* PuTTY 0.55 fixes these vulnerabilities. It is available at: http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/download.html PuTTY maintainers recommend that everybody upgrade to 0.55 as soon as possible. -- The latest PuTTY version in ports is 0.55. - jt ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
802.1x
I will be attending college in a few weeks. The network at this uni requires 802.1x authentication over wireless connections. I've scoured google all over and discovered Open1x--which has openly dropped all BSD support--and a guy who has ported Open1x, but only on wired connections. I'm a decent programmer in some regards, but not so much C/system code, so it's not like I could just make the neccesary adjustments and recompile. :) Is 802.1x supported on FreeBSD yet? I know I can build open1x on a Linux box, but that is my ABSOLUTE LATE resort. I really want to keep using FreeBSD, but if I can't access the school's network I won't be able to continue doing so. What's the status of this in FreeBSD, including the upcoming 5.3? Am I just out of luck? Regards, Cubicool -- http://www.the-bob.org/~jlmoles -- AIM: cubicool MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] IRC: cubicool :: irc.openprojects.net -- If the automobile had followed the same development cycle as the computer, a Rolls-Royce would today cost $100, get a million miles per gallon, and explode once a year, killing everyone inside. - Robert X. Cringely. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help me ObwanKnobi your my only hope.
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 14:11:14 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have spent many usless hours looking at Freebsd.org, google.com and yahoo.com in an attempt to find a ftpd that I can cap / choke the outgoing bandwith. Do you know of any such animals? Yes, ProFTPD (ftp/proftpd in ports) will let you do this flexibly. See the TransferRate directive used in proftpd.conf for details. (E.g., http://www.proftpd.org/docs/directives/linked/config_ref_TransferRate.html) Cheers, Paul. -- e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Without music to decorate it, time is just a bunch of boring production deadlines or dates by which bills must be paid. --- Frank Vincent Zappa ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [OT] Security hole in PuTTY (Windows ssh client)
it was said: I think what you are saying is that if you use PuTTY as a client application that you should be concerned about what server you connect to? From what you are saying, I suspect that if the only use is to connect to your own (FreeBSD) server, you are probably ok? Jay O'Brien Hello, To quote from the link: In SSH2, an attacker impersonating a trusted host can launch an attack before the client has the ability to determine the difference between the trusted and fake host. This attack is performed before host key verification. Presuming one were connecting over private network IP space by IP address only, then I believe you are correct. I can imagine scenarios in which if one were to connect over the Internet or even into a different network segment using DNS that one would be at risk. The vendor has a patched the hole and released 0.55, recommending all users update. If I were using this software, I would take their advice. Note: Apparently, a Unix version exists, and the source code is available under the MIT Licence. So I guess my post was completely OT. HTH, Stheg __ Do you Yahoo!? Y! Messenger - Communicate in real time. Download now. http://messenger.yahoo.com ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
filesystem full on install
I'm trying to install FreeBSD for the first time but I am having an error that I can't figure out. I have googled for an answer and read mailing list posts but still can't find what I'm looking for. First, when the disk boots and checks the hardware, it does something strange to my network card that makes my router light turn yellow instead of green indicating 10 Mbps mode instead of 100. Anyway, once I get ready to do the install, it can't contact the ftp site, it just stays forever at connecting but it does change my network card back so the router light is green. If I do a control c to cancel it and restart installation, I can contact the site. However, when it starts to install, it fails saying the filesystem is full. This can't be. It's a 40Gb drive. I started by overwriting my hd using a utility called boot and nuke. Then I allocated the whole thing to freebsd and made that partition bootable. Then in disklabel, I hit a to do a default setup. I've tried several different things in disklabel and I wipe my disk clean between each try and nothing seems to work. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks. _ Check out Election 2004 for up-to-date election news, plus voter tools and more! http://special.msn.com/msn/election2004.armx ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Frequent crashes with Mozilla and Firefox
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 12:51:36PM -0700, Your Name wrote: In the last few weeks ive started getting a number of crashes using either Mozilla or Firefox. im using the newest version of each from Ports, on FreeBSD 4.9. Sorry for the me too post, but since people are reporting different results: I have two main computers, one running 4.10 and one running 5.2-CURRENT, but with otherwise similar setups. GNOME in both cases. The CURRENT machine is fine; I'm pretty sure I've never had a crash in several months of operation. The 4.10 machine is similar to the OP's report: I get relatively frequent but unpredictable crashes on complex Web pages, with both Mozilla and Firefox. It's annoying, and I'd love to know causes and solutions! Jesse Sheidlower ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How to start clean install again?
What's the best way to erase an installation of FreeBSD completely from a HD and start over? I'm installing 4.10 from am ISO CD, and it installs fine. However, I would like to start over from scratch and it remembers some of what was on the HD from the last install. If I were in Windows/DOS I would just format C: but that doesn't seem to be an option here. Jay O'Brien Rio Linda, CA USA ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ProFTPd: 229 Entering Extended Passive Mode
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aaron Dalton Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 4:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ProFTPd: 229 Entering Extended Passive Mode As a follow-up, this happens even if I replace ProFTPd with the built-in ftpd via inetd. How do I eliminate this delay? Cheers! -- Aaron Dalton http://aaron.daltons.ca ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aaron, Is there a firewall running on that system or between server and client? Andras Kende http://www.kende.com ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How to start clean install again?
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jay O'Brien Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 8:21 PM To: FreeBSD - questions Subject: How to start clean install again? What's the best way to erase an installation of FreeBSD completely from a HD and start over? I'm installing 4.10 from am ISO CD, and it installs fine. However, I would like to start over from scratch and it remembers some of what was on the HD from the last install. If I were in Windows/DOS I would just format C: but that doesn't seem to be an option here. Jay O'Brien Rio Linda, CA USA ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jay, Boot from CD as usual at When displaying the hard disk with FreeBSD slice click on Delete key... Then just recreate the partition as before... Andras Kende http://www.kende.com ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to start clean install again?
Jay O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What's the best way to erase an installation of FreeBSD completely from a HD and start over? I'm installing 4.10 from am ISO CD, and it installs fine. However, I would like to start over from scratch and it remembers some of what was on the HD from the last install. If I were in Windows/DOS I would just format C: but that doesn't seem to be an option here. During the reinstall, when it comes time to slice the disk with fdisk, simply delete the previous slice and recreate it. That will blow away anything that existed before. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vinum in -CURRENT (was: Vinum panic on boot)
On Thursday, 8 July 2004 at 2:21:30 -0500, Mario Doria wrote: Hi, Another vinum question. I have a machine running 5-CURRENT sources from yesterday (yes I know the dangers of running CURRENT and I did read the mailing list archives). Well, the issue was discussed there. I think I found a bug, if I add start_vinum=YES to /etc/rc.conf, at boot I get a panic with a message saying: panic: vinum: dangling vnode snip Im sorry I do not have the complete message, it is the machine I am using as a gateway and I prefered to get online and find some more information. I'd be happy to compile a debugging kernel if necessary. Well, is the least that people will ask of you when running -CURRENT. But since this problem has already been reported, there's no longer much point. The current status of Vinum in -CURRENT is that it is being rewritten. The introduction of the GEOM layer has badly broken Vinum, and it has been decided better to rewrite it than to fix it. It'll be a while before it's smooth again. Greg -- When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. If you don't, I may ignore the reply or reply to the original recipients. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html Note: I discard all HTML mail unseen. Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for PGP public key. See complete headers for address and phone numbers. pgpxH9bTWbfku.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: ProFTPd: 229 Entering Extended Passive Mode
On August 16, 2004 07:24 pm, Andras Kende wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aaron Dalton Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 4:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ProFTPd: 229 Entering Extended Passive Mode Is there a firewall running on that system or between server and client? There is indeed and I finally found an article that speaks about it. The solution was for me to manually enter the passive command before transferring. This is odd seeing as it says it's entering some form of passive mode, but it's really not. What's even more odd is that for me to make Konqueror work with this server, I had to go to KControl and turn PASV ftp mode OFF! Go figure. Anyway, it seems to work now. Cheers! -- Aaron Dalton http://aaron.daltons.ca ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help me ObwanKnobi your my only hope.
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 15:33:56 -0700 Brooks Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 02:11:14PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have spent many usless hours looking at Freebsd.org, google.com and yahoo.com in an attempt to find a ftpd that I can cap / choke the outgoing bandwith. Do you know of any such animals? dummynet(4) will probably do what you want unless you need to do it per user. Can be done if you use inetd. Just set up a rule limiting certian users to certian pipes. :) ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]