Re: mod_perl ... mod_perl2

2004-08-16 Thread Will
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
FreeBSD Daemon wrote:
| Dear list,
|
| What is the difference between mod_perl and mod_perl2 in the port
| collection of 4.10?
|
| TIA
|
| zheyu
| ___
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
| http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
| To unsubscribe, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
|
One is the devel version of Mod Perl and the other is the stable -
http://perl.apache.org/download/index.html you might find it faster to
read the pkg-descr in the ports and visit the website than write to the
list to try and find out.
- --
Do yourself a favor, don't use IE!
www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/
PGP is Preferable for Email, Public
key available off PGP Key Server.
GPG Key ID: 0x787AD6A9
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQCVAwUBQSBfqwx4IHh4etapAQJ03QQAkMvxI51jM8OE/LSllebpMaP4889ZGV0K
oyGDoNMoqz8Q21VEvt7g7L3KWUuiCCmZX5ZeJqH5wFqsAQxFspBA65A1R8vSUNaI
d0tWoItDWuRoHfwJ5zC6dbnBwDxXgQZzF6qkKf+5Gnidgtn8bVNGDDaCZOL2+PM1
PW3P0kIFiAU=
=XAp6
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: root access to ftp, telnet

2004-08-16 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 08:23:08PM -0700, Jay O'Brien wrote:
 Bill Moran wrote:
  Jay O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 After I first connect via telnet as a user and attempt su, 
 the response is you are not in the correct group (wheel) 
 to su root.

  Add the user to the wheel group who you want to be able su.

 Thanks; I found /etc/group and edited the wheel line. Now I can 
 telnet in and su to root.  I see it was that way on the old 
 setup. I must have added my user name to wheel when I set it 
 up the first time, but I didn't document that selection, so I 
 didn't repeat it when rebuilding.

Eeek!  You do realise you've just sent the root password across your
network in plain text?  Maybe your network is completely secure and
you aren't running a risk by doing that, but on the whole it's a
really bad idea.  Get into the habit of using ssh(1) routinely for
your own peace of mind, if nothing else.  You can also replace ftp(1)
for many purposes by scp(1) or rsync(1) (from the net/rsync port),
both of which operate over ssh(1).

Cheers,

Matthew

-- 
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   26 The Paddocks
  Savill Way
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow
Tel: +44 1628 476614  Bucks., SL7 1TH UK


pgpdRtSR0qy2J.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: kernel module configuration

2004-08-16 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2004-08-15 18:04, Hanspeter Roth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 in the kernel configuration one can enable various devices by the
 respective 'device' statement. It seems that most drivers go into
 the kernel directly. Some drivers such as 'acpi' produce a kernel
 module.
 How is determined which modules become built in and which become
 modules?

If you don't include something in the kernel it's built as a module.

 Can I have 'ohci' as a kernel module?

I haven't tried.  I don't know for sure.

- Giorgos

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: mod_php5 and php5-cli

2004-08-16 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 07:37:53AM +0200, Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote:

 Is there some deeper reason why mod_php and php-cli conflict?
 I have got mod_php5 and apache2 running and would like to enable 
 the php command line interface, too. How can I do this?

Install the lang/php5 port which should get you both cli and mod_php5
support together.  Make sure that WITH_APACHE2 is set in
/etc/make.conf or equivalent so you get apache-2.x support, rather
than apache-1.3.x.

Cheers,

Matthew

-- 
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   26 The Paddocks
  Savill Way
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow
Tel: +44 1628 476614  Bucks., SL7 1TH UK


pgpsJrKQoNV1e.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: mod_perl ... mod_perl2

2004-08-16 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 02:18:03AM -0500, Will wrote:
 FreeBSD Daemon wrote:

 | What is the difference between mod_perl and mod_perl2 in the port
 | collection of 4.10?

 One is the devel version of Mod Perl and the other is the stable -
 http://perl.apache.org/download/index.html you might find it faster to
 read the pkg-descr in the ports and visit the website than write to the
 list to try and find out.

While that is true, the difference is actually rather more significant
than that.  mod_perl only works with apache-1.3.x and mod_perl2 only
works with apache-2.x.  mod_perl2 is still considered a development
version, which is why the version number is 1.99rNN -- only once it's
achieved production quality will it be released as version 2.0.

Cheers,

Matthew 

-- 
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   26 The Paddocks
  Savill Way
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow
Tel: +44 1628 476614  Bucks., SL7 1TH UK


pgpOpf8kYpQWo.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Which version of FreeBSD to support a 3ware Escalade 7006 and 8006 controllers?

2004-08-16 Thread Darren Pilgrim
I'm looking at getting a 3ware Escalade 7006 or 8006 RAID controller for
one of my servers.  The machine presently runs RELENG_4_8.  The twe man
page for that version doesn't list the 7000 or 8000 series controllers.
However, 3ware lists 4.8 as the supported version of FreeBSD for both.
Which is correct?

More to the point: What would be the recommended version of FreeBSD I
should use for these controllers?  Does it really matter?


___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: anjuta

2004-08-16 Thread Henrik W Lund
John Oxley wrote:
I have installed anjuta 1.2.2 from ports and am getting some odd errors:
It complains that libtool is not installed but I have installed as
dependencies both libtool13 and libtool15.  When I symlink
/usr/local/bin/libtool15 to libtool and do the same for libtoolize, the
autogen.sh script works but configure is failing with:
loading cache /dev/null within ltconfig
ltconfig: you must specify a host type if you use `--no-verify'
Try `ltconfig --help' for more information.
configure: error: libtool configure failed
Can anyone help me
TIA,
-Ox
 

Greetings!
Supply the following argument to the configure script (this can be done 
via the menu, I forget the exact one):

--target=your system type
your system type is output by the configure script, so just check the 
logs and copy-paste. Why this mechanism fails to supply this information 
to ltconfig automatically is beyond me.

Hope this helps!
-Henrik W Lund
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: at?

2004-08-16 Thread Malcolm Kay
On Monday 16 August 2004 14:35, Björn Lindström wrote:
 I'm trying to use at(1) on our co-located server, but unless I run
 it as root, I get this error:

 at: you do not have permission to use this program

 I know this isn't how FreeBSD behaves by default, so I'm wondering if
 anyone has an idea on what our hosters might have tweaked to make this
 occur.

For FreeBSD 4.x this *is* the default behaviour according to the man page.
Read at(1) with particular attention to the files at.deny and at.allow.

Malcolm

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: find -exec surprisingly slow

2004-08-16 Thread Paul A. Hoadley
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 02:22:02PM -0700, Pat Lashley wrote:

 Could you create a user to get them; and give that user a procmail
 (or similar) delivery-time script to file them into subdirs based on
 some arbitrary characteristic?

Sounds feasible.  The sheer volume has overwhelmed me, though, and now
I'm just throwing them out.

 Just FYI, Exim, with the ExiScan patches, can reject at SMTP time;
 and also has a 'fakereject' capability which tells the sender that
 the message has been rejected; but actually delivers it.

Thanks for the info.  I have been thinking of changing MTAs for a
while.


-- 
Paul.

w  http://logicsquad.net/
h  http://paul.hoadley.name/


pgpHzYz6Anj4V.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: find -exec surprisingly slow

2004-08-16 Thread Paul A. Hoadley
Hello,

On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 11:56:10AM +0100, Scott Mitchell wrote:

 I don't know how committed to qmail you are, but Exim will do this
 out of the box.  I'm pretty sure it's part of the default config
 file.  With the exim+exiscan patches (available from ports) you can
 get even more creative and integrate virus scanning, SpamAssassin,
 etc. with very little effort.

Thanks.  I have been thinking of changing MTAs for a while.


-- 
Paul.

w  http://logicsquad.net/
h  http://paul.hoadley.name/


pgpABygqhYvTm.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Is promiscuous mode bad?

2004-08-16 Thread Ruben de Groot
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 07:53:10PM -0700, Kevin Stevens typed:
 
 A lot of network scanners also trigger on NICS in promiscuous mode 
 (there's a way to detect them, I forget the details at the moment) 
 because admins want to know if any hosts are out there sniffing.

How sure are you about that? AFAIK there's no way to detect a NIC in 
promiscuous mode *from the outside*. I would be very interested in a network
scanner that could.

Ruben

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Is promiscuous mode bad?

2004-08-16 Thread JJB

Promiscuous mode can also be enabled on most hardware routers. A
hardware router in front of a private network with promiscuous mode
enabled allows public internet users to access (sniff) all the
traffic passing through the router as well as insert packets. This
is major security leak and one that spoofers look for.

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: mod_perl ... mod_perl2

2004-08-16 Thread Tom Hukins
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 01:38:27PM +0800, FreeBSD Daemon wrote:
 What is the difference between mod_perl and mod_perl2 in the port
 collection of 4.10?

mod_perl works with Apache 1.3; mod_perl2 works with Apache 2.  See
http://perl.apache.org/ more for details.

Tom
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


aterm question

2004-08-16 Thread dick hoogendijk
What can I do about this strange aterm behaviour of NOT showing é or è
but instead it just gives me a ´e of `e whatever I try.

I.e. vim runs fine under xterm, with dead_acute ; dead_diaeresis etc..
but if I start vim (or any other editor) under aterm all those é è ë
stuff is lost. Even a normal comma or dblquote can not be printed to the
screen.

This happens no matter how I configure the use of this high-ascii (in
XFree86 or with xmodmap makes no diff at all). I really do not know
where to look anymore.

Please any hints?

-- 
dick -- http://www.nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE
++ Running FreeBSD 4.10 ++ Debian GNU/Linux (Woody)
+ Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilja
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Error Compiling cyrus-sasl2-saslauthd

2004-08-16 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Please don't top-post. 

Alex Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I found my problem. Current version of OpenSSL is 0.9.7d. Downloaded
 package of it off FreeBSD.org. Question now is, Why is my ports list
 so out of date? Just installed system today.

Your ports list has nothing to do with it.

 Alex Thomas wrote:
 
  Trying to complie cyrus-sasl2-saslauthd from ports.  Ports
  collection is up to date.
  ---
   
 
  Dependency warning: used OpenSSL version contains known vulnerabilities
  Please update or define either WITH_OPENSSL_BASE or WITH_OPENSSL_PORT
  *** Error code 1
 
  Stop in /usr/ports/security/cyrus-sasl2-saslauthd.
  ---
   
 
  Checked version of OpenSSL that is installed to /usr/bin/openssl :
 OpenSSL 0.9.7c 30 Sep 2003
 
  The most recent version in ports shows the same version.
  System is FreeBSD 5.2.1 fresh install.


That's your base system.  That *was* the latest version at the time
FreeBSD 5.2.1 was created.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


How to increase scrollback for FreeBSD-4.10?

2004-08-16 Thread Mike
Greetings:
I have a FBSD-4.10 system that I log into using PuTTY (on a Win2K 
workstation).  I am able to set PuTTY's  scrollback to 1200 lines.

When I'm on the 4.10 box the scrollback is about 200 lines. If possible 
I'd like to set the  scroll back to 600 lines or so (at least).

Question: How do I increase the scrollback on 4.10?
Note: The video card on the 4.10 box is a Voodoo3-2000 (16 Mb) card.
I searched the FBSD mail archives going back to 2003 and could not find 
a single reference.  I also googled and could not turn up anything 
specific to FBSD.

Hints?
Thanks,
Michael
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


4.10 Install failure.

2004-08-16 Thread Tyler Parrott
Hey All, 

I am havign some trouble installing FreeBSD 4.10 on my PC.  I
downloaded an ISO image (and verified the checksum) from the Canadian
FreeBSD FTP site.  After burning the image to CD, I checked the
checksums, which were the same.

When I put the CD in the drive and attempt to boot from it, I just get
a register dump and the computer halts.

For example:  AL:.   AH:.  AX:..
EAX: etc.

I have made another CD from the same image and the same thing happens.
 I have a Compaq Eco PC, with a 2.0 GHz PIV processor, 256MB Ram,
40gig HDD, etc...

Any suggestions on what I could try to remedy this?

Thanks
Tyler
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: How to increase scrollback for FreeBSD-4.10?

2004-08-16 Thread Michael Clark

 -Original Message-
 From: Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 8:59 AM
 To: freebsd-questions
 Subject: How to increase scrollback for FreeBSD-4.10?
 
 
 Greetings:
 
 I have a FBSD-4.10 system that I log into using PuTTY (on a Win2K 
 workstation).  I am able to set PuTTY's  scrollback to 1200 lines.
 
 When I'm on the 4.10 box the scrollback is about 200 lines. 
 If possible 
 I'd like to set the  scroll back to 600 lines or so (at least).
 
 Question: How do I increase the scrollback on 4.10?
 
 Note: The video card on the 4.10 box is a Voodoo3-2000 (16 Mb) card.
 
 I searched the FBSD mail archives going back to 2003 and 
 could not find 
 a single reference.  I also googled and could not turn up anything 
 specific to FBSD.
 
 Hints?
 
 Thanks,
 Michael

kbdcontrol

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=FreeBSD+Console+increasehl=enlr=ie=UTF-
8selm=5q1lq7%24bjg%241%40nikko.utsunomiya-u.ac.jprnum=2

Michael Clark
Nemschoff Chairs Inc
mclark at nemschoff dot com
CompTIA A+, Network+, Server+, MCP
Voice: (920) 457 7726 x294
Fax:  (920) 453 6594


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This electronic transmission, including all
attachments, is directed in confidence solely to the person(s) to whom it is
addressed, or an authorized recipient, and may not otherwise be distributed,
copied or disclosed. The contents of the transmission may also be subject to
intellectual property rights and all such rights are expressly claimed and
are not waived. If you have received this transmission in error, please
notify the sender immediately by return electronic transmission and then
immediately delete this transmission, including all attachments, without
copying, distributing or disclosing same. 


___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: freebsd's gallery

2004-08-16 Thread K. Greenwood

--- Paulo Roberto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 What happened to it? I couldn't find it...
 

While I certainly do not mean it to be as abrasive as
the site proclaims (I am not saying that you are
either an idiot, nor stupid)... google is good.

http://www.justfuckinggoogleit.com/search?query=galleryas_sitesearch=freebsd.org

Good luck.




__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail is new and improved - Check it out!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: How to increase scrollback for FreeBSD-4.10?

2004-08-16 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 06:58:57AM -0700, Mike wrote:

 When I'm on the 4.10 box the scrollback is about 200 lines. If possible 
 I'd like to set the  scroll back to 600 lines or so (at least).
 
 Question: How do I increase the scrollback on 4.10?

That depends on the console program you're using.  For an xterm(1),
the following in ~/.Xdefaults will give you 8k scrollback lines:

xterm*saveLines:8192

(Remember to run '/usr/X11R6/bin/xrdb -merge ${HOME}/.Xdefaults' out
of .xsession or .xinit so that gets set every time you log in)

For the system console, you'll need to play with the syscons(4)
history size.  Modify your kernel configuration to set

options SC_HISTORY_SIZE=N

where N is the number of lines of scroll back you want (default 100).
Then build and install a new kernel in the usual way:

http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig.html

There doesn't seem to be any way of achieving the same effect via
sysctl(8), which is unfortunate.

Cheers,

Matthew

-- 
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   26 The Paddocks
  Savill Way
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow
Tel: +44 1628 476614  Bucks., SL7 1TH UK


pgpNChokvi650.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: How to increase scrollback for FreeBSD-4.10?

2004-08-16 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 03:09:30PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
 On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 06:58:57AM -0700, Mike wrote:
 
  When I'm on the 4.10 box the scrollback is about 200 lines. If possible 
  I'd like to set the  scroll back to 600 lines or so (at least).
  
  Question: How do I increase the scrollback on 4.10?
 
 That depends on the console program you're using.  For an xterm(1),
 the following in ~/.Xdefaults will give you 8k scrollback lines:
 
 xterm*saveLines:8192
 
 (Remember to run '/usr/X11R6/bin/xrdb -merge ${HOME}/.Xdefaults' out
 of .xsession or .xinit so that gets set every time you log in)
 
 For the system console, you'll need to play with the syscons(4)
 history size.  Modify your kernel configuration to set
 
 options SC_HISTORY_SIZE=N
 
 where N is the number of lines of scroll back you want (default 100).
 Then build and install a new kernel in the usual way:
 
 http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig.html
 
 There doesn't seem to be any way of achieving the same effect via
 sysctl(8), which is unfortunate.

Except of course, for the kbdcontrol(1) program which I am reminded
does all that sort of stuff.  Changing SC_HISTORY_SIZE will let you
alter the default size of the history buffer, kbdcontrol(1) lets you
override that to whatever value you want.

Cheers,

Matthew

-- 
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   26 The Paddocks
  Savill Way
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow
Tel: +44 1628 476614  Bucks., SL7 1TH UK


pgp0L7HCs5ELr.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: freebsd's gallery

2004-08-16 Thread Aaron Myles Landwehr
K. Greenwood wrote:
While I certainly do not mean it to be as abrasive as
 

the site proclaims (I am not saying that you are
either an idiot, nor stupid)... google is good.
http://www.justfuckinggoogleit.com/search?query=galleryas_sitesearch=freebsd.org
Good luck.
 

If you are going post on the list then please refrain from attempting to 
insult others; otherwise, don't post.
-aaron myles landwehr
--;
This Message was scanned by Clam AntiVirus (clamd / ClamAV version 0.75.1) on snaphat.com;
Please direct questions or comments to 'admin at snaphat.com';
FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p9
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Is promiscuous mode bad?

2004-08-16 Thread Siddhartha Jain
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
JJB wrote:
| Promiscuous mode can also be enabled on most hardware routers. A
| hardware router in front of a private network with promiscuous mode
| enabled allows public internet users to access (sniff) all the
| traffic passing through the router as well as insert packets. This
| is major security leak and one that spoofers look for.
|
I am curious, how do you do that? From what I understand, a promiscous
mode allows someone on the box to see all packets that hit the
interface. How does it allow an attacker (outside the box) to sniff
packets hitting that interface?
Thanks,
- --
Siddhartha Jain (CISSP)
Consulting Engineer
Netmagic Solutions Pvt Ltd
Bombay - 400063
Phone: +91-22-26850001 Ext.128
Fax  : +91-22-26850002
http://www.netmagicsolutions.com

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBIMWrOGaxOP7knVwRAj1nAJ9Ae+5APNi4YgeSNwxMkrv7jwUbjQCeLftp
8BIhFJfN9b5S2xUTDctKcuI=
=bt2X
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: NDISulator (project evil) installation on 5.2.1???

2004-08-16 Thread Radek Kozlowski
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 07:32:40PM -0500, Jorge Mario G. wrote:
 Hi there
 I Have a card that is supported by the ndisulator
 but it sais it's only available in -CURRENT
 
 I'm running FreeBSD-5.2.1-p9
 is there any way to install the ndisulator?

http://www.freebsddiary.org/ibm-thinkpad-t41.php and scroll down to
Project Evil - the wireless card.

-Radek
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: How to increase scrollback for FreeBSD-4.10?

2004-08-16 Thread JJB
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 -Original Message-
 From: Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 8:59 AM
 To: freebsd-questions
 Subject: How to increase scrollback for FreeBSD-4.10?


 Greetings:

 I have a FBSD-4.10 system that I log into using PuTTY (on a Win2K
 workstation).  I am able to set PuTTY's  scrollback to 1200
lines.

 When I'm on the 4.10 box the scrollback is about 200 lines.
 If possible
 I'd like to set the  scroll back to 600 lines or so (at least).

 Question: How do I increase the scrollback on 4.10?

 Note: The video card on the 4.10 box is a Voodoo3-2000 (16 Mb)
card.

 I searched the FBSD mail archives going back to 2003 and
 could not find
 a single reference.  I also googled and could not turn up
anything
 specific to FBSD.

 Hints?

 Thanks,
 Michael

 kbdcontrol



Scroll Lock History
While your system boots, probe messages scroll across the consoles
screen so fast that you can not read them. Or when you list the
contents of a large directory the same thing happens. The messages
may have scrolled off your screen, but they are still in the screen
buffer. You can redisplay the messages from the screen buffer. You
hit the keyboard 'scroll lock' button, (IE: top row right side) and
then use the keyboard up arrow button to scroll back through the
screen buffer to redisplay the message lines. The 'page up' and
'page down' buttons also work to move backward and forwards through
the screen buffer one full screen page at a time. Hit the 'scroll
lock' button again when you are finished to return to the command
line prompt.

The default size of the screen buffer is to small to contain all the
boot messages, so it should be increased to 200 lines.


This is how you increase the size of the screen buffer.


Add the -h 200 option onto the allscreens_flags= statement you
already added to the /etc/rc.conf file

ee /etc/rc.conf

and add this statement,

allscreens_flags=–h 200  # -h size of scroll lock buffer in number
of lines

Save the changed file and ‘reboot’ your system for your edit changes
to take effect.

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: How to increase scrollback for FreeBSD-4.10?

2004-08-16 Thread doug
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 03:09:30PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
 On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 06:58:57AM -0700, Mike wrote:
 
  When I'm on the 4.10 box the scrollback is about 200 lines. If possible 
  I'd like to set the  scroll back to 600 lines or so (at least).
  
  Question: How do I increase the scrollback on 4.10?
 
 That depends on the console program you're using.  For an xterm(1),
 the following in ~/.Xdefaults will give you 8k scrollback lines:
 
 xterm*saveLines:8192
 
 (Remember to run '/usr/X11R6/bin/xrdb -merge ${HOME}/.Xdefaults' out
 of .xsession or .xinit so that gets set every time you log in)
 
 For the system console, you'll need to play with the syscons(4)
 history size.  Modify your kernel configuration to set
 
 options SC_HISTORY_SIZE=N
 
 where N is the number of lines of scroll back you want (default 100).
 Then build and install a new kernel in the usual way:
 
xterm like programs allow the -sl switch lines.  I've had problems with
numbers approaching 32767 but have never nailed down exactly how many
lines I can save.  I safely use -sl 3 for xterm, rxvt, aterm, and
gnome-terminal.

This would be an excellent topic to include in the fortune file:
freebsd-tips


-- 
Regards,
Doug
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


subversion on 5.x

2004-08-16 Thread dave
Hello,
I'm trying to install subversion on a 5.x box. I've got a current ports
tree and running perl 5.85. I've tried:
make WITH_PERL=yes WITH_APACHE2_APR=yes install clean
because i want to be able to access subversion via the apache web server
interface. I'm getting an error:
/usr/ports/devel/subversion/work/subversion-1.0.6/subversion/bindings/swig/s
wigutil_pl.c:1073: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
then an error code 1 and the process aborts.
Any help appreciated.
Thanks.
Dave.

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Security question - uids of 0

2004-08-16 Thread James A. Coulter
The following appeared in my latest daily security run output:

Checking for uids of 0:
root 0
toor 0

This is the first time I've seen this message.

I checked /etc/passwd and found this:

root:*:0:0:Charlie :/root:/bin/csh
toor:*:0:0:Bourne-again Superuser:/root:

I am running FreeBSD 4.10 as a gateway/router/firewall with IPFW for a small
home LAN.  

I ran ps -aux and looked for any processes owned by toor but didn't find any.

Is this something to be concerned about?  

Sorry if this is an obvious question, but I am still very much a newbie
and trying to learn what I can about security.

Thanks for your patience,

Jim
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: 4.10 Install failure.

2004-08-16 Thread Peter Ryan
 

  Hey All,
 
  I am havign some trouble installing FreeBSD 4.10 on my PC.  I 
  downloaded an ISO image (and verified the checksum) from the
 Canadian
  FreeBSD FTP site.  After burning the image to CD, I checked the 
  checksums, which were the same.
 
  When I put the CD in the drive and attempt to boot from it, I just
 get
  a register dump and the computer halts.


I have just got over a similar painful learning experience.
I made a dumb mistake that might help you. I first just burnt the 
ISO file to a CD like I would any other file. (I had no idea what 
an ISO image was :))

After i discovered that you need special software to burn
an ISO image, I downloaded the trial version of UltraISO
software.  It wanted to use Nero Burning ROM to actually
do the burn. Once I had these 2 bits of software installed,
I could actually use the CD's I burnt.

I also burnt CD's of the 2 flp images. I happened to use Sonic
Record Now to do that, and there was a button I could press
that read the flp image and created a bootable CD.  

(This was pretty useful because the floppy drive in the PC
was unusable)

Hope this helps
Peter


___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Security question - uids of 0

2004-08-16 Thread Volker Kindermann
Hi James,


 The following appeared in my latest daily security run output:
 
   Checking for uids of 0:
   root 0
   toor 0
 
 This is the first time I've seen this message.
 
 I checked /etc/passwd and found this:
 
   root:*:0:0:Charlie :/root:/bin/csh
   toor:*:0:0:Bourne-again Superuser:/root:
 
 I am running FreeBSD 4.10 as a gateway/router/firewall with IPFW for a
 small home LAN.  
 
 I ran ps -aux and looked for any processes owned by toor but didn't
 find any.

did you install bash? Normally, the bash from ports or packages will
install the toor account so you don't have to change root's shell.

If you installed bash then there's nothing to worry about this entry.
If you don't need it, just use vipw and delete it.

 -volker
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: freebsd's gallery

2004-08-16 Thread K. Greenwood

--- Aaron Myles Landwehr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 K. Greenwood wrote:
 
 While I certainly do not mean it to be as abrasive
 as
   
 
 the site proclaims (I am not saying that you are
 either an idiot, nor stupid)... google is good.
 

http://www.justfuckinggoogleit.com/search?query=galleryas_sitesearch=freebsd.org
 
 Good luck.
   
 
 If you are going post on the list then please
 refrain from attempting to 
 insult others; otherwise, don't post.
 -aaron myles landwehr

Aaron.  I appreciate your concern... and I certainly
intended no offense as stated prior, by the following:

While I certainly do not mean it to be as abrasive as
the site proclaims (I am not saying that you are
either an idiot, nor stupid)... google is good.

Paulo... if I did not emphasize that enough, and you
were offended, I am sorry.  

I did not mean to imply that you are either dumb,
an idiot, or stupid.  Once again, if you took
offense, I do apologise.





__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail 
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Security question - uids of 0

2004-08-16 Thread Siddhartha Jain
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James A. Coulter wrote:
| The following appeared in my latest daily security run output:
|
|   Checking for uids of 0:
|   root 0
|   toor 0
|
| This is the first time I've seen this message.
|
| I checked /etc/passwd and found this:
|
|   root:*:0:0:Charlie :/root:/bin/csh
|   toor:*:0:0:Bourne-again Superuser:/root:
|
| I am running FreeBSD 4.10 as a gateway/router/firewall with IPFW for a
small
| home LAN.
|
| I ran ps -aux and looked for any processes owned by toor but didn't
find any.
|
| Is this something to be concerned about?
|
| Sorry if this is an obvious question, but I am still very much a newbie
| and trying to learn what I can about security.
http://freebsd.active-venture.com/faq/security.html#TOOR-ACCOUNT
- --
Siddhartha Jain (CISSP)
Consulting Engineer
Netmagic Solutions Pvt Ltd
Bombay - 400063
Phone: +91-22-26850001 Ext.128
Fax  : +91-22-26850002
http://www.netmagicsolutions.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBIM3MOGaxOP7knVwRAv1HAJ4+/67fLaZbpgR3U25vy9xGMLtelQCeKhdO
iTuVWEHFhbH/n+1tXxNIYFY=
=RBsX
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Security question - uids of 0

2004-08-16 Thread Radek Kozlowski
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 09:57:37AM -0500, James A. Coulter wrote:
 The following appeared in my latest daily security run output:
 
   Checking for uids of 0:
   root 0
   toor 0
 
 This is the first time I've seen this message.
 
 I checked /etc/passwd and found this:
 
   root:*:0:0:Charlie :/root:/bin/csh
   toor:*:0:0:Bourne-again Superuser:/root:
 
 I am running FreeBSD 4.10 as a gateway/router/firewall with IPFW for a small
 home LAN.  
 
 I ran ps -aux and looked for any processes owned by toor but didn't find any.
 
 Is this something to be concerned about?  
 
 Sorry if this is an obvious question, but I am still very much a newbie
 and trying to learn what I can about security.
 
 Thanks for your patience,

http://www.freebsd.org/doc/faq/security.html#TOOR-ACCOUNT

-Radek
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: 4.10 Install failure.

2004-08-16 Thread Tyler Parrott
Hey Guys,

The CD's both have valid data structures (i.e. directories, etc...).
I'm positive that I burnt the image correctly, as it's not just an
.ISO file and the checksums check out correctly.

I checked for the options in the BIOD but they're not there.  The BIOS
is Compaq Computer Corporation Setup Ultility

Any other ideas as to what I might try?

Thanks
Tyler

On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 22:57:24 +0800, Peter Ryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
   Hey All,
  
   I am havign some trouble installing FreeBSD 4.10 on my PC.  I
   downloaded an ISO image (and verified the checksum) from the
  Canadian
   FreeBSD FTP site.  After burning the image to CD, I checked the
   checksums, which were the same.
  
   When I put the CD in the drive and attempt to boot from it, I just
  get
   a register dump and the computer halts.
 
 
 I have just got over a similar painful learning experience.
 I made a dumb mistake that might help you. I first just burnt the
 ISO file to a CD like I would any other file. (I had no idea what
 an ISO image was :))
 
 After i discovered that you need special software to burn
 an ISO image, I downloaded the trial version of UltraISO
 software.  It wanted to use Nero Burning ROM to actually
 do the burn. Once I had these 2 bits of software installed,
 I could actually use the CD's I burnt.
 
 I also burnt CD's of the 2 flp images. I happened to use Sonic
 Record Now to do that, and there was a button I could press
 that read the flp image and created a bootable CD.
 
 (This was pretty useful because the floppy drive in the PC
 was unusable)
 
 Hope this helps
 Peter
 

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Security question - uids of 0

2004-08-16 Thread Jerry McAllister
 
 The following appeared in my latest daily security run output:
 
   Checking for uids of 0:
   root 0
   toor 0
 
 This is the first time I've seen this message.
 
 I checked /etc/passwd and found this:
 
   root:*:0:0:Charlie :/root:/bin/csh
   toor:*:0:0:Bourne-again Superuser:/root:
 
 I am running FreeBSD 4.10 as a gateway/router/firewall with IPFW for a small
 home LAN.  
 
 I ran ps -aux and looked for any processes owned by toor but didn't find any.
 
 Is this something to be concerned about?  

No.  It is normal.
It is one of the normal accounts put there in a standard install.
It is essentially a root account by another name.
Some things used to like to use it to own their installed stuff but
avoid using root directly.
I don't know if anything really does that any more.
I sometimes use it as a model pw entry when in vipw for
creating new accounts directly to help avoid missing a field.

 
 Sorry if this is an obvious question, but I am still very much a newbie
 and trying to learn what I can about security.

This has been brought up and answered numerous times in the past.
You might try and search for information on toor account.  You 
should be able to find something.

jerry

 
 Thanks for your patience,
 
 Jim
 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Is promiscuous mode bad?

2004-08-16 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Aug 16), Ruben de Groot said:
 On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 07:53:10PM -0700, Kevin Stevens typed:
  A lot of network scanners also trigger on NICS in promiscuous mode
  (there's a way to detect them, I forget the details at the moment)
  because admins want to know if any hosts are out there sniffing.
 
 How sure are you about that? AFAIK there's no way to detect a NIC in
 promiscuous mode *from the outside*. I would be very interested in a
 network scanner that could.

The basic points are that since the kernel sees packets it usually
doesn't, there may be codepaths that incorrectly process certain
packets and send replies.  There's also a small delay in processing all
those extra packets that might be seen as extra latency in pings etc.
As CPUs get faster and kernel bugs get fixed, these become harder and
harder to detect.

Do a web or usenet search for detect promiscuous mode for lots and
lots of links.

-- 
Dan Nelson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: 4.10 Install failure.

2004-08-16 Thread Ralph Hempel

   I am havign some trouble installing FreeBSD 4.10 on my PC.  I 
   downloaded an ISO image (and verified the checksum) from the
  Canadian
   FreeBSD FTP site.  After burning the image to CD, I checked the 
   checksums, which were the same.
  
   When I put the CD in the drive and attempt to boot from it, I just
  get
   a register dump and the computer halts.
 
 
 I have just got over a similar painful learning experience.
 I made a dumb mistake that might help you. I first just burnt the 
 ISO file to a CD like I would any other file. (I had no idea what 
 an ISO image was :))
 
 After i discovered that you need special software to burn
 an ISO image, I downloaded the trial version of UltraISO
 software.  It wanted to use Nero Burning ROM to actually
 do the burn. Once I had these 2 bits of software installed,
 I could actually use the CD's I burnt.

Unless you have a crippled version of Nero, it will let you burn
ISO images. You don't need UltraISO. Just cancel the stupid
wizard at startup and choose File/BurnImage from the main
Nero window.
 
 I also burnt CD's of the 2 flp images. I happened to use Sonic
 Record Now to do that, and there was a button I could press
 that read the flp image and created a bootable CD.  

Also unnecessary. Nero lets you choose CDROM(boot) if you select
File/New from the main menu. Just point it to the floppy image
you want to burn and you are good to go.

Ralph
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: 4.10 Install failure.

2004-08-16 Thread Tyler Parrott
After reading that, I think it might be possible that I burnt the
images correctly, but I simply did not make the CD's bootable.  I was
using k3b to burn the images, but I might just have a go at it with
Nero.  Thanks!

On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 11:23:08 -0400, Ralph Hempel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
I am havign some trouble installing FreeBSD 4.10 on my PC.  I
downloaded an ISO image (and verified the checksum) from the
   Canadian
FreeBSD FTP site.  After burning the image to CD, I checked the
checksums, which were the same.
   
When I put the CD in the drive and attempt to boot from it, I just
   get
a register dump and the computer halts.
 
 
  I have just got over a similar painful learning experience.
  I made a dumb mistake that might help you. I first just burnt the
  ISO file to a CD like I would any other file. (I had no idea what
  an ISO image was :))
 
  After i discovered that you need special software to burn
  an ISO image, I downloaded the trial version of UltraISO
  software.  It wanted to use Nero Burning ROM to actually
  do the burn. Once I had these 2 bits of software installed,
  I could actually use the CD's I burnt.
 
 Unless you have a crippled version of Nero, it will let you burn
 ISO images. You don't need UltraISO. Just cancel the stupid
 wizard at startup and choose File/BurnImage from the main
 Nero window.
 
  I also burnt CD's of the 2 flp images. I happened to use Sonic
  Record Now to do that, and there was a button I could press
  that read the flp image and created a bootable CD.
 
 Also unnecessary. Nero lets you choose CDROM(boot) if you select
 File/New from the main menu. Just point it to the floppy image
 you want to burn and you are good to go.
 
 Ralph
 
 
 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: 4.10 Install failure.

2004-08-16 Thread Jerry McAllister
 
 After reading that, I think it might be possible that I burnt the
 images correctly, but I simply did not make the CD's bootable.  I was
 using k3b to burn the images, but I might just have a go at it with
 Nero.  Thanks!

The CD image that you download from the FreeBSD site is already a
bootable ISO.   It needs to be written to the CD as a raw file and
not converted or processed in any way.  It should not be put in a
file system on the CD or processed to be bootable, or etc.   It is 
already a complete CD image.

jerry

 
 On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 11:23:08 -0400, Ralph Hempel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
 I am havign some trouble installing FreeBSD 4.10 on my PC.  I
 downloaded an ISO image (and verified the checksum) from the
Canadian
 FreeBSD FTP site.  After burning the image to CD, I checked the
 checksums, which were the same.

 When I put the CD in the drive and attempt to boot from it, I just
get
 a register dump and the computer halts.
  
  
   I have just got over a similar painful learning experience.
   I made a dumb mistake that might help you. I first just burnt the
   ISO file to a CD like I would any other file. (I had no idea what
   an ISO image was :))
  
   After i discovered that you need special software to burn
   an ISO image, I downloaded the trial version of UltraISO
   software.  It wanted to use Nero Burning ROM to actually
   do the burn. Once I had these 2 bits of software installed,
   I could actually use the CD's I burnt.
  
  Unless you have a crippled version of Nero, it will let you burn
  ISO images. You don't need UltraISO. Just cancel the stupid
  wizard at startup and choose File/BurnImage from the main
  Nero window.
  
   I also burnt CD's of the 2 flp images. I happened to use Sonic
   Record Now to do that, and there was a button I could press
   that read the flp image and created a bootable CD.
  
  Also unnecessary. Nero lets you choose CDROM(boot) if you select
  File/New from the main menu. Just point it to the floppy image
  you want to burn and you are good to go.
  
  Ralph
  
  
  ___
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
  http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
  To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: 4.10 Install failure.

2004-08-16 Thread Tyler Parrott
Yeah, right after I sent that email I read about the image already
being bootable.  I supposed I should do my homework before making my
posts:)

Anyways, the image is burnt correctly, so I'm back to where I started
with no idea how to move forward...

On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 11:36:47 -0400 (EDT), Jerry McAllister
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  After reading that, I think it might be possible that I burnt the
  images correctly, but I simply did not make the CD's bootable.  I was
  using k3b to burn the images, but I might just have a go at it with
  Nero.  Thanks!
 
 The CD image that you download from the FreeBSD site is already a
 bootable ISO.   It needs to be written to the CD as a raw file and
 not converted or processed in any way.  It should not be put in a
 file system on the CD or processed to be bootable, or etc.   It is
 already a complete CD image.
 
 jerry
 
 
 
 
  On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 11:23:08 -0400, Ralph Hempel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  I am havign some trouble installing FreeBSD 4.10 on my PC.  I
  downloaded an ISO image (and verified the checksum) from the
 Canadian
  FreeBSD FTP site.  After burning the image to CD, I checked the
  checksums, which were the same.
 
  When I put the CD in the drive and attempt to boot from it, I just
 get
  a register dump and the computer halts.
   
   
I have just got over a similar painful learning experience.
I made a dumb mistake that might help you. I first just burnt the
ISO file to a CD like I would any other file. (I had no idea what
an ISO image was :))
   
After i discovered that you need special software to burn
an ISO image, I downloaded the trial version of UltraISO
software.  It wanted to use Nero Burning ROM to actually
do the burn. Once I had these 2 bits of software installed,
I could actually use the CD's I burnt.
  
   Unless you have a crippled version of Nero, it will let you burn
   ISO images. You don't need UltraISO. Just cancel the stupid
   wizard at startup and choose File/BurnImage from the main
   Nero window.
  
I also burnt CD's of the 2 flp images. I happened to use Sonic
Record Now to do that, and there was a button I could press
that read the flp image and created a bootable CD.
  
   Also unnecessary. Nero lets you choose CDROM(boot) if you select
   File/New from the main menu. Just point it to the floppy image
   you want to burn and you are good to go.
  
   Ralph
  
  
   ___
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
   http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
   To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  ___
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
  http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
  To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Any problems with php 4.3.8_2

2004-08-16 Thread John Cholewa
Hi,
I upgraded the php4 port on this 4.8-RELEASE box to 4.3.8_2.  I'm also 
using apache+mod_ssl-1.3.31+2.8.19.

When the lines
LoadModule php4_modulelibexec/apache/libphp4.so
AddModule mod_php4.c
are uncommented, apache segfaults on startup.
We're not in a position to upgrade to a newer version of FreeBSD, given 
that this box is a thousand miles away from us and I, being a novice in 
many respects, am considered the unquestioned unix/bsd/etc expert in 
this company (sadly, I wear too many hats for my employers to become 
genuinely experienced in any one thing).

I read in a recent post that installing php5 seems to be something that 
you install *instead* of mod_php5 and php5-cli.  Does the same apply 
for php4?  I ask because I have mod_php4-4.3.8_2,1, php4-4.3.8_2 and 
php4-cli-4.3.8_2 installed here (as listed in /var/db/pkg, all 
installed from ports)

Has anything simlar to what I've described been reported with newer 
versions of php?  Might I have installed conflicting packages?  Any 
suggestions will be welcomed.  :)

--
 -JC
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: How to increase scrollback for FreeBSD-4.10?

2004-08-16 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2004-08-16 09:21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 03:09:30PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
  On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 06:58:57AM -0700, Mike wrote:
   When I'm on the 4.10 box the scrollback is about 200 lines. If
   possible I'd like to set the scroll back to 600 lines or so
   (at least).
  
   Question: How do I increase the scrollback on 4.10?
 
  That depends on the console program you're using.  For an xterm(1),
  the following in ~/.Xdefaults will give you 8k scrollback lines:
 
  xterm*saveLines:8192

 xterm like programs allow the -sl switch lines.  I've had problems with
 numbers approaching 32767 but have never nailed down exactly how many
 lines I can save.  I safely use -sl 3 for xterm, rxvt, aterm, and
 gnome-terminal.

I use screen most of the time in my terminal sessions, which also
includes a nice option for scrollback.  Putting the following in my
~/.screenrc file works like a charm:

defscrollback 1

This is IMHO a bit more preferable than using syscons scrollback,
because syscons allocates memory inside the kernel for the scrollback
buffer IIRC.  I tend to prefer userspace allocations when possible, like
the xterm -sl or screen's scrollback.

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: root access to ftp, telnet -- CP/M?

2004-08-16 Thread Jay O'Brien
Matthew Seaman wrote:
 
 Eeek!  You do realise you've just sent the root password across your
 network in plain text?  Maybe your network is completely secure and
 you aren't running a risk by doing that, but on the whole it's a
 really bad idea.  Get into the habit of using ssh(1) routinely for
 your own peace of mind, if nothing else.  You can also replace ftp(1)
 for many purposes by scp(1) or rsync(1) (from the net/rsync port),
 both of which operate over ssh(1).
 
Matthew,
Thanks for your concern. Once there is anything on the computer, I 
will certainly close those security holes. Right now it is only a 
means to learn about FreeBSD and document the steps necessary to build 
a machine that will fit my needs. I opened ftp and telnet access to 
root as a simple way to copy files to and from a windows computer and 
to control the FreeBSD computer from another location. I do plan to 
implement ssh, but first I must evaluate PuTTY and other alternatives. 

In the meantime, it is protected from the internet by a hardware 
router that doesn't forward any ports to the FreeBSD computer.

There's so much to learn! This experience with FreeBSD takes me back 
to my days with CP/M and S-100 bus computers. Maybe if CP/M had been 
allowed to grow up, rather than be killed by DOS and Windows, it 
could have become CP/M-BSD?

Jay O'Brien
Rio Linda, CA USA
 

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: root access to ftp, telnet -- CP/M?

2004-08-16 Thread uidzero
Jay O'Brien wrote:
Matthew Seaman wrote:
 

Eeek!  You do realise you've just sent the root password across your
network in plain text?  Maybe your network is completely secure and
you aren't running a risk by doing that, but on the whole it's a
really bad idea.  Get into the habit of using ssh(1) routinely for
your own peace of mind, if nothing else.  You can also replace ftp(1)
for many purposes by scp(1) or rsync(1) (from the net/rsync port),
both of which operate over ssh(1).
   

Matthew,
Thanks for your concern. Once there is anything on the computer, I 
will certainly close those security holes. Right now it is only a 
means to learn about FreeBSD and document the steps necessary to build 
a machine that will fit my needs. I opened ftp and telnet access to 
root as a simple way to copy files to and from a windows computer and 
to control the FreeBSD computer from another location. I do plan to 
implement ssh, but first I must evaluate PuTTY and other alternatives. 

In the meantime, it is protected from the internet by a hardware 
router that doesn't forward any ports to the FreeBSD computer.

There's so much to learn! This experience with FreeBSD takes me back 
to my days with CP/M and S-100 bus computers. Maybe if CP/M had been 
allowed to grow up, rather than be killed by DOS and Windows, it 
could have become CP/M-BSD?

Jay O'Brien
Rio Linda, CA USA
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

I use WinSCP from my Windows boxes to my servers. Enable ssh so that it 
allows root. It's secure. No need for ftp and telnet.

Michael
--
Michael D. Whities
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.one-arm.com
--
There are four colors of hats to watch for: 
Black, White, Grey, and Red.

The meanings are: 
Cracker, Hacker, Guru, and Victim.

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Any problems with php 4.3.8_2

2004-08-16 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 11:47:06AM -0400, John Cholewa wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I upgraded the php4 port on this 4.8-RELEASE box to 4.3.8_2.  I'm also 
 using apache+mod_ssl-1.3.31+2.8.19.
 
 When the lines
 
 LoadModule php4_modulelibexec/apache/libphp4.so
 AddModule mod_php4.c
 
 are uncommented, apache segfaults on startup.
 
 We're not in a position to upgrade to a newer version of FreeBSD, given 
 that this box is a thousand miles away from us and I, being a novice in 
 many respects, am considered the unquestioned unix/bsd/etc expert in 
 this company (sadly, I wear too many hats for my employers to become 
 genuinely experienced in any one thing).
 
 I read in a recent post that installing php5 seems to be something that 
 you install *instead* of mod_php5 and php5-cli.  Does the same apply 
 for php4?  I ask because I have mod_php4-4.3.8_2,1, php4-4.3.8_2 and 
 php4-cli-4.3.8_2 installed here (as listed in /var/db/pkg, all 
 installed from ports)
 
 Has anything simlar to what I've described been reported with newer 
 versions of php?  Might I have installed conflicting packages?  Any 
 suggestions will be welcomed.  :)

Hmmm... well, the structure of the php4 ports parallels the structure
of the php5 ports, so yes you are correct that you shouldn't have all
of the packages installed simultaneously.  If you try and install that
combination with an up to date ports tree it will complain:

% cd /usr/ports/lang/php4
% make -V CONFLICTS
php4-cli-4* mod_php4-4* php4-cgi-4* php5-5* php5-cli-5* mod_php5-5* php5-cgi-5*

Unless you've been deliberately ignoring warnings, the only way you
can end up with that sort of situation is by updating a system from
before the CONFLICTS mechanism was introduced.  Since the whole
CONFLICTS thing is about not installing ports that all lay claim to
various files, the symptom you see of PHP causing apache to segfault
could well be a consequence.  Another way in which you can get into
trouble is to install a php *package* from the FTP sites: the package
will have been compiled against the plain non-ssl version of apache,
and that is significantly different internally to the mod_ssl version
you're using.  So long as you compile the php stuff yourself,
everything should work OK with whatever version of apache you choose.

I suggest that you deinstall all PHP related ports (anything with php
or pecl in the name) and start again from scratch just installing the
minimum that you need.  With the new ports framework it's very easy to
add extension modules, should you find that you need to.

Cheers,

Matthew

-- 
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   26 The Paddocks
  Savill Way
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow
Tel: +44 1628 476614  Bucks., SL7 1TH UK


pgp5L92qHEvAU.pgp
Description: PGP signature


RE: root access to ftp, telnet -- CP/M?

2004-08-16 Thread Ralph Hempel
 Matthew,
 Thanks for your concern. Once there is anything on the computer, I 
 will certainly close those security holes. Right now it is only a 
 means to learn about FreeBSD and document the steps necessary to build 
 a machine that will fit my needs. I opened ftp and telnet access to 
 root as a simple way to copy files to and from a windows computer and 
 to control the FreeBSD computer from another location. I do plan to 
 implement ssh, but first I must evaluate PuTTY and other alternatives. 

PuTTY works great! Here's a bit more info on my experience setting
up a FreeBSD server and using PuTTY:

http://www.hempeldesigngroup.com/embedded/stories/bdgFreeBSDandWindows.html

Cheers, Ralph 
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: mod_php5 and php5-cli

2004-08-16 Thread Peter Ulrich Kruppa
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 07:37:53AM +0200, Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote:
Is there some deeper reason why mod_php and php-cli conflict?
I have got mod_php5 and apache2 running and would like to enable
the php command line interface, too. How can I do this?
Install the lang/php5 port which should get you both cli and mod_php5
support together.  Make sure that WITH_APACHE2 is set in
/etc/make.conf or equivalent so you get apache-2.x support, rather
than apache-1.3.x.
Great,
Thanks!
Uli.
Cheers,
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   26 The Paddocks
 Savill Way
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow
Tel: +44 1628 476614  Bucks., SL7 1TH UK
+---+
|Peter Ulrich Kruppa|
| Wuppertal |
|  Germany  |
+---+
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: 4.10 Install failure.

2004-08-16 Thread K. Greenwood

--- Tyler Parrott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Yeah, right after I sent that email I read about the
 image already
 being bootable.  I supposed I should do my homework
 before making my
 posts:)
 
 Anyways, the image is burnt correctly, so I'm back
 to where I started
 with no idea how to move forward...

snipped stuff ensuring good cd burn, and system
unable to boot from cd

First off, I have never pretended to know what I am
talking about... I am just a random subscriber.  Take
what I say with a grain of salt.

That being out of the way, a quick little comment.

You previously mentioned you had a compaq evo (?). 
Have you tried making bootable floppies and trying
them?

http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install-pre.html#INSTALL-FLOPPIES

Also, have you tried experimenting with your bios
settings?  Perhaps Advanced, Device options? 
Specifically the ACPI settings... (I kinda doubt this
will have any effect, however).

Was the error similar to the following? (after loading
bootstrap loader)


|
int=000d  err=  efl=00030246  eip=3034
eax=205d  ebx=0004  ecx=2000  edx=288c
esi=08d5  edi=0006290c  ebp=1538  esp=1502
cs=f000  ds=ee00  es=ee00  fs=  gs=  ss=ee00
cs:eip=0f 20 dd 81 e5 00 f0 0f-20 c2 0f 01 e0 a8 01 75
   08 80 e2 fe e8 53 ff eb-21 0f 20 e0 a9 30 00 75
ss:esp=0c 29 06 00 d5 08 00 00-38 15 00 00 22 15 00 00
   04 00 00 00 8c 28 00 00-04 00 00 00 5d 28 00 00
BTX halted


Hopefully someone who knows more than I (accounts for 
pretty much everyone on this list...) comprehends what
this means.  I'm without clue.

Hth, and good luck.




__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail is new and improved - Check it out!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


ipfw2 or ipfilter

2004-08-16 Thread Stefan Cars
Hi!

I'm looking into if I should go with ipfw2 or ipfilter, anyone that could
point me to some links or tell me pro's and con's (both feature and
performance wise).

Kind Regards,
Stefan Cars

--
Stefan Cars
Snowfall Communications
http://www.snowfall.se
Tel: +46 (0)18 430 80 50 - Direct: +46 (0)18 430 80 51
Mobile: +46 (0)708 44 36 00 - Fax: +46 (0)708 44 36 04
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


dell 400sc scsi and 4.10 install

2004-08-16 Thread Jeanne
Hi,

I've seen this topic come up in the lists recently but I haven't seen a solution for 
it. I'm trying to install 4.10 on a new 400SC. When I boot I see:

HBA ID  LUN Vendor
0   0   0   Fugitsu 36422MB
0   7   0   LSILogic 1020/1030
1   7   0   LSILogic 1020/2030

I'm able to partition the 36G drive but then the install (floppy - network) hangs when 
creating the file systems.
Unable to make new root filesystem on /dev/da0s1a
Command returned status 36

BIOS options for drive configurations: SATA Primary off/auto, primary master off/auto, 
ide drive udama off/auto.

I would appreciate any help at all. Thanks.

Jeanne 

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: dell 400sc scsi and 4.10 install

2004-08-16 Thread Jerry McAllister
 
 Hi,
 
 I've seen this topic come up in the lists recently but I haven't seen a 
 solution for it. I'm trying to install 4.10 on a new 400SC. When I boot I see:
 
 HBA   ID  LUN Vendor
 0 0   0   Fugitsu 36422MB
 0 7   0   LSILogic 1020/1030
 1 7   0   LSILogic 1020/2030
 
 I'm able to partition the 36G drive but then the install (floppy - network) 
 hangs when creating the file systems.
 Unable to make new root filesystem on /dev/da0s1a
 Command returned status 36
 
 BIOS options for drive configurations: SATA Primary off/auto, primary 
 master off/auto, ide drive udama off/auto.

We had one site with nearly the same stuff (Dell 400, etc and a controller
that seemed to be SATA) and the same result.

We could not install on it and the site admin finally replaced the 
controller with a plain SCSI and was able to install with no problem.

Note that it appeared to slice (fdisk) and make partitiona (disklabel)
and these showed up on future attempts so it seemed to be able
to write the label.  But, it was completely unable to write anything
more than that.   The newfs failed as you see.

So, no help, but just some support for your experience - unless
recommending switching to a SCSI controller is considered help.

I posted to the list at that time and had a couple inquiries, but
no-one seemed to have any workable suggestions.   I am guessing
that the driver support is incomplete for that setup, but don't
know enough to pinpoint it.

jerry

 
 I would appreciate any help at all. Thanks.
 
 Jeanne 
 
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: 4.10 Install failure.

2004-08-16 Thread Tyler Parrott
Thanks for all the advice, it is much appreciated.  I'll give the
floppies a try.

That error that you pasted is pretty much exactly what I get, although
I'm not sure whether or not the register values are the same:)

Again, I'll try with the floppies:)

Thanks!

On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 09:46:05 -0700 (PDT), K. Greenwood
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 --- Tyler Parrott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Yeah, right after I sent that email I read about the
  image already
  being bootable.  I supposed I should do my homework
  before making my
  posts:)
 
  Anyways, the image is burnt correctly, so I'm back
  to where I started
  with no idea how to move forward...
 
 snipped stuff ensuring good cd burn, and system
 unable to boot from cd
 
 First off, I have never pretended to know what I am
 talking about... I am just a random subscriber.  Take
 what I say with a grain of salt.
 
 That being out of the way, a quick little comment.
 
 You previously mentioned you had a compaq evo (?).
 Have you tried making bootable floppies and trying
 them?
 
 http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install-pre.html#INSTALL-FLOPPIES
 
 Also, have you tried experimenting with your bios
 settings?  Perhaps Advanced, Device options?
 Specifically the ACPI settings... (I kinda doubt this
 will have any effect, however).
 
 Was the error similar to the following? (after loading
 bootstrap loader)
 
 |
 int=000d  err=  efl=00030246  eip=3034
 eax=205d  ebx=0004  ecx=2000  edx=288c
 esi=08d5  edi=0006290c  ebp=1538  esp=1502
 cs=f000  ds=ee00  es=ee00  fs=  gs=  ss=ee00
 cs:eip=0f 20 dd 81 e5 00 f0 0f-20 c2 0f 01 e0 a8 01 75
08 80 e2 fe e8 53 ff eb-21 0f 20 e0 a9 30 00 75
 ss:esp=0c 29 06 00 d5 08 00 00-38 15 00 00 22 15 00 00
04 00 00 00 8c 28 00 00-04 00 00 00 5d 28 00 00
 BTX halted
 
 Hopefully someone who knows more than I (accounts for
 pretty much everyone on this list...) comprehends what
 this means.  I'm without clue.
 
 Hth, and good luck.
 
 
 __
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! Mail is new and improved - Check it out!
 http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
 
 
 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: 4.10 Install failure.

2004-08-16 Thread W. D.
At 10:43 8/16/2004, Tyler Parrott, wrote:
Yeah, right after I sent that email I read about the image already
being bootable.  I supposed I should do my homework before making my
posts:)

Anyways, the image is burnt correctly, so I'm back to where I started
with no idea how to move forward...

On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 11:36:47 -0400 (EDT), Jerry McAllister
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  After reading that, I think it might be possible that I burnt the
  images correctly, but I simply did not make the CD's bootable.  I was
  using k3b to burn the images, but I might just have a go at it with
  Nero.  Thanks!
 
 The CD image that you download from the FreeBSD site is already a
 bootable ISO.   It needs to be written to the CD as a raw file and
 not converted or processed in any way.  It should not be put in a
 file system on the CD or processed to be bootable, or etc.   It is
 already a complete CD image.
 
 jerry

Try your 4.10 CD on a different computer?  Burn a 4.9 CD?

Start Here to Find It Fast!™ - http://www.US-Webmasters.com/best-start-page/
$8.77 Domain Names - http://domains.us-webmasters.com/

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: ipfw2 or ipfilter

2004-08-16 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 06:46:23PM +0200, Stefan Cars wrote:

 I'm looking into if I should go with ipfw2 or ipfilter, anyone that could
 point me to some links or tell me pro's and con's (both feature and
 performance wise).

Unless your running quite a complicated setup or have specific
requirements then there isn't really any preference for one over the
other.  If you're running a typical home system, even with say, a
10Mbit/s cable modem connection, any reasonably modern FreeBSD machine
is going to be able to do firewall filtering without breaking into a
sweat.  You'ld need so quite fancy hardware to detect performance
differences between the two.

Probably the biggest reason to choose one over the other is simple
personal preference between the different rule-set styles.  ipfw is
'first match wins' (hence rule sets tend to be ordered from most to
least specific).  ipfilter is 'last match wins', so the most general
rules tend to go at the top of rulesets -- although there are special
'quick' rules that can shortcut the process.

In general both firewalls have very similar functionality.  ipfw(8)
can act as a filtering bridge and it can provide weighted fair queuing
and bandwidth limited pipes in conjunction with dummynet(4).  ipfilter
seems to have more complete IPv6 support than ip6fw.

Cheers,

Matthew

-- 
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   26 The Paddocks
  Savill Way
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow
Tel: +44 1628 476614  Bucks., SL7 1TH UK


pgpqIxTh2d78B.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Security question - uids of 0

2004-08-16 Thread James A. Coulter
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 05:01:51PM +0200, Volker Kindermann wrote:
 Hi James,
 
 
  The following appeared in my latest daily security run output:
  
  Checking for uids of 0:
  root 0
  toor 0
  
  This is the first time I've seen this message.
  
  I checked /etc/passwd and found this:
  
  root:*:0:0:Charlie :/root:/bin/csh
  toor:*:0:0:Bourne-again Superuser:/root:
  
  I am running FreeBSD 4.10 as a gateway/router/firewall with IPFW for a
  small home LAN.  
  
  I ran ps -aux and looked for any processes owned by toor but didn't
  find any.
 
 did you install bash? Normally, the bash from ports or packages will
 install the toor account so you don't have to change root's shell.
 
 If you installed bash then there's nothing to worry about this entry.
 If you don't need it, just use vipw and delete it.
 
  -volker

Thank you Volker - I did install bash several weeks ago, so the sudden
appearance of the message in my daily security run caught my attention.

Thanks to everyone who sent the 
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/faq/security.html#TOOR-ACCOUNT
link. 

Jim 
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: dell 400sc scsi and 4.10 install

2004-08-16 Thread Jeanne
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 13:07:17 -0400 (EDT)
Jerry McAllister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
  Hi,
  
  I've seen this topic come up in the lists recently but I haven't seen a 
  solution for it. I'm trying to install 4.10 on a new 400SC. When I boot I see:
  
  HBA ID  LUN Vendor
  0   0   0   Fugitsu 36422MB
  0   7   0   LSILogic 1020/1030
  1   7   0   LSILogic 1020/2030
  
  I'm able to partition the 36G drive but then the install (floppy - network) 
  hangs when creating the file systems.
  Unable to make new root filesystem on /dev/da0s1a
  Command returned status 36
  
  BIOS options for drive configurations: SATA Primary off/auto, primary 
  master off/auto, ide drive udama off/auto.
 
 We had one site with nearly the same stuff (Dell 400, etc and a controller
 that seemed to be SATA) and the same result.
 
 We could not install on it and the site admin finally replaced the 
 controller with a plain SCSI and was able to install with no problem.

Jerry - thanks for the response. I did see your comments on the situation you describe 
below, sorry that you had to say the same thing twice. But I was/am confused, because 
I'm not using SATA. I am using the LSILogic scsi controller card. Am I correct in 
understanding that the LSILogic Ultra320 scsi controller is not supported in FreeBSD? 
Sorry for the confusion. This is the first trouble I've ever had with a Dell (IDE or 
SCSI).

Can anyone confirm that the lsilogic ultra320 scsi controller just wont work at all, 
or just won't work in 4.10. Is there maybe some way to emulate an adaptec card or 
something like that? 

(I'm pushing for more help because I've got a deadline for putting a machine in 
production and shipping this back will really cause a delay). Thanks again for any 
help,

Jeanne


 
 Note that it appeared to slice (fdisk) and make partitiona (disklabel)
 and these showed up on future attempts so it seemed to be able
 to write the label.  But, it was completely unable to write anything
 more than that.   The newfs failed as you see.
 
 So, no help, but just some support for your experience - unless
 recommending switching to a SCSI controller is considered help.
 
 I posted to the list at that time and had a couple inquiries, but
 no-one seemed to have any workable suggestions.   I am guessing
 that the driver support is incomplete for that setup, but don't
 know enough to pinpoint it.
 
 jerry
 
  
  I would appreciate any help at all. Thanks.
  
  Jeanne 
  
 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: How to increase scrollback for FreeBSD-4.10?

2004-08-16 Thread Mike
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2004-08-16 09:21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 03:09:30PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 06:58:57AM -0700, Mike wrote:
When I'm on the 4.10 box the scrollback is about 200 lines. If
possible I'd like to set the scroll back to 600 lines or so
(at least).
Question: How do I increase the scrollback on 4.10?
That depends on the console program you're using.  For an xterm(1),
the following in ~/.Xdefaults will give you 8k scrollback lines:
   xterm*saveLines:8192
xterm like programs allow the -sl switch lines.  I've had problems with
numbers approaching 32767 but have never nailed down exactly how many
lines I can save.  I safely use -sl 3 for xterm, rxvt, aterm, and
gnome-terminal.

I use screen most of the time in my terminal sessions, which also
includes a nice option for scrollback.  Putting the following in my
~/.screenrc file works like a charm:
defscrollback 1
This is IMHO a bit more preferable than using syscons scrollback,
because syscons allocates memory inside the kernel for the scrollback
buffer IIRC.  I tend to prefer userspace allocations when possible, like
the xterm -sl or screen's scrollback.
 
Greetings:
Thank you for the tips!!!
I went and tried this using this kdbcontrol command in my .cshrc:
# added to increase scrollback to 1000
/usr/sbin/kbdcontrol -h 1000
This gave me 1,000 lines when I'm logged into the console however, it 
resulted in a Inapproriate ioctrl for device error when using xterm 
(xfterm4) under xfce4.

So I removed the kdbcontrol from my .cshrc and used a -sl 3000 
option to launch xfterm4.

So launching xfterm4 -sl 3000 now does the trick!
Regards,
Michael

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Xãnax Here

2004-08-16 Thread Nickolas Contreras
!--
pancake manure refrain dr approbation gather wherewithal yeshiva candela comfort 
cabana ignominious mcgovern dysplasia wreath charge behold averse  clothesmen 
gustafson ottoman precinct haberdashery purport snider affinity lacquer creepy 
bouffant doze abridgment mercilessly annoyance 
!--
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


ProFTPd: 229 Entering Extended Passive Mode

2004-08-16 Thread Aaron Dalton
I am running the latest port version of ProFTPd on one of my servers but it 
seems to hang for as long as 60 seconds whenever I attempt to transfer data.  
The cmd line says 229 Entering Extended Passive Mode and then hangs.  
Eventually it does work, but it greatly impedes my coding efforts.  What is 
odd is that this does *not* occur when I access an identical ProFTPd 
installation on another machine.  Does anybody know what might cause this 
sort of excessive delay and how maybe to repair it?

Thank you, as always, for your time and assistance.
-- 
Aaron Dalton
http://aaron.daltons.ca
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


My Atheros WIFI adapter

2004-08-16 Thread Fridrik Bragi Dyrfjordðrik Bragi Dýrfjör
Supposedly, the Atheros 5212 chipset supports both 11.a/b/g, but for
some reason 'ifconfig -m' does not return any modes for the 11b network
(which I am currently trying to stay connected to).

bumbaldi# dmesg |grep ath0

ath0: Atheros 5212 mem 0xed80-0xed80 irq 16 at device 13.0 on
pci0
ath0: mac 5.6 phy 4.1 5ghz radio 1.7 2ghz radio 2.3
ath0: 11a rates: 6Mbps 9Mbps 12Mbps 18Mbps 24Mbps 36Mbps 48Mbps 54Mbps
ath0: 11g rates: 1Mbps 2Mbps 5.5Mbps 11Mbps 6Mbps 9Mbps 12Mbps 18Mbps
24Mbps 36Mbps 48Mbps 54Mbps
ath0: turbo rates: 6Mbps 9Mbps 12Mbps 18Mbps 24Mbps 36Mbps 48Mbps 54Mbps
ath0: 802.11 address: 00:20:a6:4f:93:77

Nor does the dmesg as you can see.

I am using FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE and I have just rebuild world and
installed a new kernel, still nothing works.

Does anyone know why this happens?

This is causing me allot of problems, I cannot connect to the router
properly because the card randomly looses carrier and I - of course -
loose connectivity.  Very irritating, because I often disconnect from
IRC, slow download etc.

Regards, 
Fridrik Bragi Dyrfjord


___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: dell 400sc scsi and 4.10 install

2004-08-16 Thread David Kelly
On Aug 16, 2004, at 12:34 PM, Jeanne wrote:
Jerry - thanks for the response. I did see your comments on the 
situation you describe below, sorry that you had to say the same thing 
twice. But I was/am confused, because I'm not using SATA. I am using 
the LSILogic scsi controller card. Am I correct in understanding that 
the LSILogic Ultra320 scsi controller is not supported in FreeBSD? 
Sorry for the confusion. This is the first trouble I've ever had with 
a Dell (IDE or SCSI).

Can anyone confirm that the lsilogic ultra320 scsi controller just 
wont work at all, or just won't work in 4.10. Is there maybe some way 
to emulate an adaptec card or something like that?
The mpt(4) driver in 5.2.1 (thats what I have, guessing its pretty much 
the same for your 4.10) says it supports the 53c1030 Dual Ultra320 
SCSI. Also says it first appeared in FreeBSD 4.6. I don't have this 
SCSI adapter.

As for SATA on the 400SC, the MB SATA interface works fine for me in 
5.2.1-p9 altho its installed on PATA, SATA only has data.

Don't believe I noticed how much memory your system has. The Dell BIOS 
has an OS installation mode which greatly truncates the amount of 
memory appearing in the system. For all I know that might prevent 
mpt(4) from operating reliably. F2 after boot and check which state 
this BIOS setting is using. What the heck? Try it the other way.

I am having problems with my 400SC failing to reboot. With ACPI enabled 
dmesg output appears cleaner than without but shutdown -r now appears 
to go all the way down to BIOS but doesn't turn around and come back 
up. At least it doesn't now, but did the first few days I was beating 
on the machine to make sure it was suitable. Seems to have happened 
when the Seagate 40G PATA drive was replaced with a Hitachi 120G PATA 
drive. Swapping back to the Seagate didn't fix the problem.

--
David Kelly N4HHE, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Top posters will not be shown the honor of a reply.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Frequent crashes with Mozilla and Firefox

2004-08-16 Thread Your Name
In the last few weeks ive started getting a number of
crashes using either Mozilla or Firefox. im using the 
newest version of each from Ports, on FreeBSD 4.9.

It typically happens when i visit a complicated
website with lots of dynamically-generated content,
like the N.Y.
Times or eBay. But its not regular; i can restart the
browser and go back to the same page and it could then
just work.

There isnt anything useful in the logs, at least,
/var/log/messages sometimes has a core dump, and 
sometimes has nothing, but it never has anything
detailed.

Sorry to be nonspecific but i cant seem to figure out
a good pattern, other than a complicated webpage. Also

im not sure what i changed when it first started. But
i am fully up to date.

Thanks for your help!

Jen




__
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail 
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: dell 400sc scsi and 4.10 install

2004-08-16 Thread Jeanne
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 13:51:19 -0500
David Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 The mpt(4) driver in 5.2.1 (thats what I have, guessing its pretty much 
 the same for your 4.10) says it supports the 53c1030 Dual Ultra320 
 SCSI. Also says it first appeared in FreeBSD 4.6. I don't have this 
 SCSI adapter.

The dell BIOS is mpt boot ROM. 
sysinstall boot shows:

mpt0:LSILogic 1030 Ultra4 adapter ...irq10 at device 1.0 on pci2
mpt1:LSILogic 1030 Ultra4 adapter ...irq10 at device 1.1 on pci2
pci2:unknown card at 12.0 irq9
da0 at mpt1 bus 0 target 0 lun 0
da0 Fugitsu.. Fixed direct acess SCSI-3 device

This level of hardware troubleshooting leaves me scratching my head. Does it seem that 
the mpt driver is working correctly?

And of course I get the same errors that Jerry was getting, 
|write error: 128
|newfs: wtfs - writecombine - Input/output error

Well unless some good hardware folks can suggest a fix I'm going to either have to 
ship this back or just throw an ide hardrive in it and put the lsi controller in the 
spare parts box. At least there is some good documentation on it in the archives if 
someone does a search on 400SC and freebsd before they make a purchase. 

Thanks for all the help.

Cheers,

Jeanne

 
 Don't believe I noticed how much memory your system has. The Dell BIOS 
 has an OS installation mode which greatly truncates the amount of 
 memory appearing in the system. For all I know that might prevent 
 mpt(4) from operating reliably. F2 after boot and check which state 
 this BIOS setting is using. What the heck? Try it the other way.

The BIOS shows that I have a full 512MB.

 
 I am having problems with my 400SC failing to reboot. With ACPI enabled 
 dmesg output appears cleaner than without but shutdown -r now appears 
 to go all the way down to BIOS but doesn't turn around and come back 
 up. At least it doesn't now, but did the first few days I was beating 
 on the machine to make sure it was suitable. Seems to have happened 
 when the Seagate 40G PATA drive was replaced with a Hitachi 120G PATA 
 drive. Swapping back to the Seagate didn't fix the problem.
 
 --
 David Kelly N4HHE, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Top posters will not be shown the honor of a reply.
 
 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


PCI ADSL Modems

2004-08-16 Thread Gary Edwards
I was wondering what PCI modems FreeBSD supports.  I have followed the
hardware link on the web site but could not find a supplier to the UK.
I was wondering if the ADSL PCI Conexant Chipset was supported.

I would be grateful for any information on this matter.

Gary Edwards

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


[no subject]

2004-08-16 Thread Glyn Tebbutt
Hi all

Just a quick question, as it was posted on the list
nvidia has released some new drivers, i've yet to try
these drivers but at the moment im having to use
-CURRENT to be able to get the previous release 
to work properly and they did very well. I rebuilt my
world/kernel with -CURRENT and then my software, xorg,
gnome 2.6 etc. My questions is, everything ive
compiled was with gcc 3.4.x thats in -CURRENT if i
downgrade to 5.2.1 Release will this cause any
problems with the software i compiled with the newer
gcc. Reasons being for changing as i dont like being
that much on the bleeding edge as im just a user not a
developer, saying that thou these new drivers might
not work out for me and i may end up going back to
-CURRENT, as i had the libpthread  libr_c problem and
had to map them with libmap.conf

Anyway any opinions please as im going to do this
tonight and if it means it will screw things up i
might just reinstall.

Thanks Again

Glyn

-- 
*-*
| Glyn Tebbutt |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|--'  http://homepage.ntlworld.com/d3c3it |
|Lisa, if you dont like your job you dont strike, |
| You just go in everyday and do it really half-assed | 
|  Thats the American way. -Homer Simpson |
*-*

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Frequent crashes with Mozilla and Firefox

2004-08-16 Thread doug
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 12:51:36PM -0700, Your Name wrote:
 In the last few weeks ive started getting a number of crashes using
 either Mozilla or Firefox. im using the newest version of each from
 Ports, on FreeBSD 4.9.
 
And on 5.2.1-RELEASE and 5.2-CURRENT

 It typically happens when i visit a complicated website with lots of
 dynamically-generated content, like the N.Y.  Times or eBay. But its
 not regular; i can restart the browser and go back to the same page
 and it could then just work.
 
Two sites that failed consistently for me were http://www.pga.com and
http://www.statefarm.com

The browser versions are 

Mozilla 1.7.2
Mozilla Firefox 0.9.3

Both versions were built from ports the day after the port was
committed.  All other ports are up-to-date.

-- 
Regards,
Doug
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: find -exec surprisingly slow

2004-08-16 Thread Pat Lashley
--On Monday, August 16, 2004 21:37:13 +0930 Paul A. Hoadley [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 02:22:02PM -0700, Pat Lashley wrote:
Just FYI, Exim, with the ExiScan patches, can reject at SMTP time;
and also has a 'fakereject' capability which tells the sender that
the message has been rejected; but actually delivers it.
Thanks for the info.  I have been thinking of changing MTAs for a
while.
I've been using Exim for years now, and in several widly varying
installations.  I can heartily recommend it as solid, flexable,
and capable.  And the config file is actually pretty easy to read
even in complex or highly customized configurations.  (Unlike a
certain ancient but still inexplicably popular MTA...)  The FreeBSD
port automatically includes the semi-official ExiScan patchest
which adds the ability to do SpamAssassin and anti-virus scanning
while the SMTP connection is still open.
The Exim mailing list has a pretty high signal-to-noise ratio;
and the folks on it tend to be friendly and helpful.  And there's
very good on-line documentation at http://www.exim.org/

-Pat
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


firewire pseudo-hotplug

2004-08-16 Thread Charles Ulrich
Hello,

Is there any way to make a shell script execute immediately after a firewire
device is plugged in? The man pages and mailing list archives didn't even get
me close to a hint of whether this is possible or not.

Failing that, is there a (good) way to tell from the command line whether a
particular device (say, a hard disk) happens to be plugged in or not?

Thanks in advance for your time.
-- 
Charles Ulrich
System Administrator
Ideal Solution - http://www.idealso.com
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: ProFTPd: 229 Entering Extended Passive Mode

2004-08-16 Thread Aaron Dalton
As a follow-up, this happens even if I replace ProFTPd with the built-in ftpd 
via inetd.  How do I eliminate this delay?

Cheers!
-- 
Aaron Dalton
http://aaron.daltons.ca
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Is promiscuous mode bad?

2004-08-16 Thread horio shoichi
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 14:24:00 +0200
Ruben de Groot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 07:53:10PM -0700, Kevin Stevens typed:
  
  A lot of network scanners also trigger on NICS in promiscuous mode 
  (there's a way to detect them, I forget the details at the moment) 
  because admins want to know if any hosts are out there sniffing.
 
 How sure are you about that? AFAIK there's no way to detect a NIC in 
 promiscuous mode *from the outside*. I would be very interested in a network
 scanner that could.
 
 Ruben
 
 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

Ping it with wrong mac.


horio shoichi

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Help me ObwanKnobi your my only hope.

2004-08-16 Thread tech39

I have spent many usless hours looking at Freebsd.org, google.com and 
yahoo.com in an attempt to find a ftpd that I can cap / choke the 
outgoing bandwith.

Do you know of any such animals?

Reading the man pages for ftpd is like trying to read and understand 
Klingon.

Thanks

DS


___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Frequent crashes with Mozilla and Firefox

2004-08-16 Thread Joshua Tinnin
On Monday 16 August 2004 01:31 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 12:51:36PM -0700, Your Name wrote:
  In the last few weeks ive started getting a number of crashes using
  either Mozilla or Firefox. im using the newest version of each from
  Ports, on FreeBSD 4.9.

 And on 5.2.1-RELEASE and 5.2-CURRENT

  It typically happens when i visit a complicated website with lots of
  dynamically-generated content, like the N.Y.  Times or eBay. But its
  not regular; i can restart the browser and go back to the same page
  and it could then just work.

 Two sites that failed consistently for me were http://www.pga.com and
 http://www.statefarm.com

 The browser versions are

  Mozilla 1.7.2
  Mozilla Firefox 0.9.3

 Both versions were built from ports the day after the port was
 committed.  All other ports are up-to-date.

I don't know if this would be helpful, but I'm testing both sites at the same 
time (tabbed) with Mozilla and Firefox, and I'm not having problems - am 
clicking through many links with both browsers fetching on both tabs (and 
Mozilla also has other tabs open). I'm running 5.2.1-RELEASE-p9 and have the 
same versions of Mozilla and Firefox as you do, and all my ports are also 
up-to-date. Both browsers have Flash, Java and scripting enabled. If it means 
anything, I'm also running X.org and Xfce4. However, the OP it was an 
intermittent problem (is it with you as well?), so not sure if I'm just 
getting lucky, as I haven't ever surfed either of those sites before.

- jt
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Frequent crashes with Mozilla and Firefox

2004-08-16 Thread Joshua Tinnin
On Monday 16 August 2004 02:30 pm, Joshua Tinnin [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
 On Monday 16 August 2004 01:31 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 12:51:36PM -0700, Your Name wrote:
   In the last few weeks ive started getting a number of crashes using
   either Mozilla or Firefox. im using the newest version of each from
   Ports, on FreeBSD 4.9.
 
  And on 5.2.1-RELEASE and 5.2-CURRENT
 
   It typically happens when i visit a complicated website with lots of
   dynamically-generated content, like the N.Y.  Times or eBay. But its
   not regular; i can restart the browser and go back to the same page
   and it could then just work.
 
  Two sites that failed consistently for me were http://www.pga.com and
  http://www.statefarm.com
 
  The browser versions are
 
   Mozilla 1.7.2
   Mozilla Firefox 0.9.3
 
  Both versions were built from ports the day after the port was
  committed.  All other ports are up-to-date.

 I don't know if this would be helpful, but I'm testing both sites at the
 same time (tabbed) with Mozilla and Firefox, and I'm not having problems -
 am clicking through many links with both browsers fetching on both tabs
 (and Mozilla also has other tabs open). I'm running 5.2.1-RELEASE-p9 and
 have the same versions of Mozilla and Firefox as you do, and all my ports
 are also up-to-date. Both browsers have Flash, Java and scripting enabled.
 If it means anything, I'm also running X.org and Xfce4. However, the OP it
 was an intermittent problem (is it with you as well?), so not sure if I'm
 just getting lucky, as I haven't ever surfed either of those sites before.

I should probably also mention that neither browser has ever crashed on me on 
FreeBSD, and I use both extensively. I've only been a FreeBSD user for a few 
months, but I've never had issues with either browser crashing whatsoever. 
I'm also running on a 2GHz Athlon and 512MB RAM. Mozilla tends to be a memory 
hog - maybe it's an issue with memory and swapping?

- jt
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Frequent crashes with Mozilla and Firefox

2004-08-16 Thread Dan Rue
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 03:31:22PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 12:51:36PM -0700, Your Name wrote:
  In the last few weeks ive started getting a number of crashes using
  either Mozilla or Firefox. im using the newest version of each from
  Ports, on FreeBSD 4.9.
  
 And on 5.2.1-RELEASE and 5.2-CURRENT

I'm having the problem too.  Been having it for months always with the
latest firefox builds.

Are you guys running it under gnome?  The console messages it logs when
it quits out (sorry I don't have them available anymore) made me think
it might be gnome+firefox specific.

dan
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


difficulties building gcc from ports collection

2004-08-16 Thread Vicki Brown
uname -a
FreeBSD test21.eng 4.7-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE #0: Fri Dec  6 
13:38:10 PST 2002 root@:/usr/src/sys/compile/350-GODSPEED-4.7 
i386

I've been trying to build a documentation package called synopsis ( 
http://synopsis.fresco.org/index.html ). It requires gcc 3.x.

I have gcc version 2.95.4 20020320 [FreeBSD]
So, of course, I cd'd to /usr/ports/lang  to build a later version of gcc.
I  tried gcc33 first (to no success) and then gcc32 (different errors):
cd /usr/ports/lang/ gcc33
sudo make install
Making GCC 3.2 for FreeBSD 4.7 elf  target i386-portbld-freebsd4.7
 Attempting to CVS checkout from
:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/gcc.
cvs [checkout aborted]: connect to subversions.gnu.org(199.232.41.3):2401
failed: Operation timed out
 Couldn't CVS checkout gcc-3.2_20020518.
 Please try again later.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/lang/gcc33.
cd ../gcc32
sudo make install
Making GCC 3.2 for FreeBSD 4.7 elf  target i386-portbld-freebsd4.7
 port_gcc32_2002-09-02.diff doesn't seem to exist in
/usr/ports/distfiles/.
 Attempting to fetch from ftp://relay.nuxi.com/obrien/.
fetch: port_gcc32_2002-09-02.diff: Undefined error: 0
 Attempting to fetch from
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/.
fetch: port_gcc32_2002-09-02.diff: File unavailable (e.g., file not found,
no access)
 Couldn't fetch it - please try to retrieve this
 port manually into /usr/ports/distfiles/ and try again.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/lang/gcc32.
then I tried gcc31 - I get a lot further...
but I get a lot of warnings:
	../../gcc-3.1.1/gcc/combine.c:10573: warning: comparison between 
signed and unsigned

still, it did eventually build and (with nudging) install.
Have people built 3.2?
Should I worry about the errors building 3.1?
--
- V.
Vicki Brown  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  (Jabber: vlbrown Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Internal Documentation:
   Review, Edit, (Re)Write - Overviews, Specs, Web Pages, Process 
Descriptions
  About: http://www.cfcl.com/vlb/Jobweb
  Demo: http://catnip.ironport.com/~vlbrown/  (pointers to recent work)
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Frequent crashes with Mozilla and Firefox

2004-08-16 Thread Andrew L. Gould
On Monday 16 August 2004 04:38 pm, Dan Rue wrote:
 On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 03:31:22PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 12:51:36PM -0700, Your Name wrote:
   In the last few weeks ive started getting a number of crashes
   using either Mozilla or Firefox. im using the newest version of
   each from Ports, on FreeBSD 4.9.
 
  And on 5.2.1-RELEASE and 5.2-CURRENT

 I'm having the problem too.  Been having it for months always with
 the latest firefox builds.

 Are you guys running it under gnome?  The console messages it logs
 when it quits out (sorry I don't have them available anymore) made me
 think it might be gnome+firefox specific.

 dan

I've been having crashes with Mozilla running in KDE on FreeBSD 4.10 
with Java and Flash plugin support.

Andrew Gould
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Gimp port broke?

2004-08-16 Thread Steven Friedrich
I'm running 4.10-STABLE.

Here's my uname output:
[EMAIL PROTECTED](p0)/usr/ports/graphics/gimp 115% uname -a
FreeBSD lightning.StevenFriedrich.org 4.10-STABLE FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE #49: Tue 
Aug 10 23:10:38 EDT 2004 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/LIGHTNING  i386


Here's the error:
/usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.5: undefined reference to `pthread_equal'
/usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.5: undefined reference to `pthread_once'
gmake[3]: *** [svg] Error 1


The log of the port build is 1.1MB and will be sent upon request.




___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Help me ObwanKnobi your my only hope.

2004-08-16 Thread E. Eusey
Taken from the vsftpd website FAQ:

Q) Help! Does vsftpd support bandwidth limiting?
A) Yes. See vsftpd.conf.5 man page and investigate settings such as
anon_max_rate and local_max_rate.

(That is, install vsftpd and run man 5 vsftpd.conf.  Alternately, read the 
HTML version at http://tinyurl.com/5qnd5 .)  Never tried this myself, but 
I've heard good things about vsftpd in general.

Evan Eusey

On Monday 16 August 2004 05:11 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I have spent many usless hours looking at Freebsd.org, google.com and
 yahoo.com in an attempt to find a ftpd that I can cap / choke the
 outgoing bandwith.

 Do you know of any such animals?

 Reading the man pages for ftpd is like trying to read and understand
 Klingon.

 Thanks

 DS


 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Application level inspection - firewall?

2004-08-16 Thread Paul Hillen
Quick question, is there an Application Level firewall available to FreeBSD.

I understand IPFilter is a stateful packet filter, but has it or any other
packages moved to the next level - Application Level Inspection?

Sorry I am all googled out on this one.

Thanks
Paul


___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Help me ObwanKnobi your my only hope.

2004-08-16 Thread Brooks Davis
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 02:11:14PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 I have spent many usless hours looking at Freebsd.org, google.com and 
 yahoo.com in an attempt to find a ftpd that I can cap / choke the 
 outgoing bandwith.
 
 Do you know of any such animals?

dummynet(4) will probably do what you want unless you need to do it per
user.

-- Brooks

-- 
Any statement of the form X is the one, true Y is FALSE.
PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529  9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4


pgp2rIt0aqwHx.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Help me ObwanKnobi your my only hope.

2004-08-16 Thread Bill Moran
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 I have spent many usless hours looking at Freebsd.org, google.com and 
 yahoo.com in an attempt to find a ftpd that I can cap / choke the 
 outgoing bandwith.
 
 Do you know of any such animals?

No.  But look at the bandwidth shaping capabilities of IPFW.  It _can_ do
what you want.

 Reading the man pages for ftpd is like trying to read and understand 
 Klingon.

I disagree.  I think the ftpd manual page is very clear and to the point.
Is English your native language?

-- 
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Help me ObwanKnobi your my only hope.

2004-08-16 Thread David Benfell
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 14:11:14 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 I have spent many usless hours looking at Freebsd.org, google.com and 
 yahoo.com in an attempt to find a ftpd that I can cap / choke the 
 outgoing bandwith.
 
This is generally not an ftp daemon function.  Bandwidth limiting may
be done through a firewall.

-- 
David Benfell, LCP
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Resume available at http://www.parts-unknown.org/resume.html
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Application level inspection - firewall?

2004-08-16 Thread Chuck Swiger
Paul Hillen wrote:
Quick question, is there an Application Level firewall available to FreeBSD.
For some definitions of that buzzword, sure.
I understand IPFilter is a stateful packet filter, but has it or any other
packages moved to the next level - Application Level Inspection?
Squid plus a firewall which blocks or redirects port 80 will serve for HTTP; 
Postfix or Qmail or whatever plus firewall rules which do the same for port 25 
serve as application-level filtering for SMTP (enough to protect that Exchange 
server some people want to run), etc.

--
-Chuck
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


[OT] Security hole in PuTTY (Windows ssh client)

2004-08-16 Thread stheg olloydson
Hello,

Sorry for the completely OT post, but I saw two mentions of PuTTY in
one day on the list and assume it must be a popular piece of Windows
software. The SANS Institute @Risk newsletter dated 8AUG04 contains
the following item regarding PuTTY:

04.31.4 CVE: Not Available
Platform: Third Party Windows Apps
Title: PuTTY Remote Buffer Overflow
Description: PuTTY is a free Telnet and SSH client. It has been
reported that PuTTY is subject to a pre-authentication buffer overflow
that can allow malicious servers to execute code on a client machine
as it attempts to negotiate connection. PuTTY 0.54 and previous
versions are vulnerable.
Ref:
http://www.coresecurity.com/common/showdoc.php?idx=417idxseccion=10 

Again, sorry for the OT post, but it seems (at least) very marginally
relevant to some. We now return you regularly scheduled program of
FBSD

Regards,

Stheg







__
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail 
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Gimp port broke?

2004-08-16 Thread Dan Finn
Don't mean to steal your spot light but here's the errors I got this
morning when trying to build:
In file included from /usr/local/include/libwmf/types.h:26,
 from /usr/local/include/libwmf/api.h:25,
 from wmf.c:33:
/usr/local/include/freetype2/freetype/freetype.h:20:2: #error
`ft2build.h' hasn't been included yet!
/usr/local/include/freetype2/freetype/freetype.h:21:2: #error Please
always use macros to include FreeType header files.
/usr/local/include/freetype2/freetype/freetype.h:22:2: #error Example:
/usr/local/include/freetype2/freetype/freetype.h:23:2: #error  
#include ft2build.h
/usr/local/include/freetype2/freetype/freetype.h:24:2: #error  
#include FT_FREETYPE_H
gmake[3]: *** [wmf.o] Error 1
gmake[3]: Leaving directory
`/usr/ports/graphics/gimp/work/gimp-2.0.4/plug-ins/common'
gmake[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/graphics/gimp/work/gimp-2.0.4/plug-ins'
gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/graphics/gimp/work/gimp-2.0.4'
gmake: *** [all] Error 2
*** Error code 2


On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 18:17:41 -0400, Steven Friedrich
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I'm running 4.10-STABLE.
 
 Here's my uname output:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED](p0)/usr/ports/graphics/gimp 115% uname -a
 FreeBSD lightning.StevenFriedrich.org 4.10-STABLE FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE #49: Tue
 Aug 10 23:10:38 EDT 2004
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/LIGHTNING  i386
 
 Here's the error:
 /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.5: undefined reference to `pthread_equal'
 /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.5: undefined reference to `pthread_once'
 gmake[3]: *** [svg] Error 1
 
 The log of the port build is 1.1MB and will be sent upon request.
 
 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


FreeBSD search question

2004-08-16 Thread Steven Friedrich
I'm using the FreeBSD search at the bottom of the home page.

I searched for libc_r and I got pages that don't have that in them.  Why?  Is 
the underscore a problem?

Also, is there anyway to limit hits to a particular language?
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [OT] Security hole in PuTTY (Windows ssh client)

2004-08-16 Thread Jay O'Brien
stheg olloydson wrote:
 Hello,
 
 Sorry for the completely OT post, but I saw two mentions of PuTTY in
 one day on the list and assume it must be a popular piece of Windows
 software. The SANS Institute @Risk newsletter dated 8AUG04 contains
 the following item regarding PuTTY:
 
 04.31.4 CVE: Not Available
 Platform: Third Party Windows Apps
 Title: PuTTY Remote Buffer Overflow
 Description: PuTTY is a free Telnet and SSH client. It has been
 reported that PuTTY is subject to a pre-authentication buffer overflow
 that can allow malicious servers to execute code on a client machine
 as it attempts to negotiate connection. PuTTY 0.54 and previous
 versions are vulnerable.
 Ref:
 http://www.coresecurity.com/common/showdoc.php?idx=417idxseccion=10 
 
 Again, sorry for the OT post, but it seems (at least) very marginally
 relevant to some. We now return you regularly scheduled program of
 FBSD
 
 Regards,
 
 Stheg
 
 
I think what you are saying is that if you use PuTTY as a client 
application that you should be concerned about what server you 
connect to?  From what you are saying, I suspect that if the only 
use is to connect to your own (FreeBSD) server, you are probably ok?

Jay O'Brien



___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [OT] Security hole in PuTTY (Windows ssh client)

2004-08-16 Thread Joshua Tinnin
On Monday 16 August 2004 03:52 pm, stheg olloydson 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hello,

 Sorry for the completely OT post, but I saw two mentions of PuTTY in
 one day on the list and assume it must be a popular piece of Windows
 software.

It is written for *nix and win32, and it has an MIT license.

 The SANS Institute @Risk newsletter dated 8AUG04 contains 
 the following item regarding PuTTY:

 04.31.4 CVE: Not Available
 Platform: Third Party Windows Apps
 Title: PuTTY Remote Buffer Overflow
 Description: PuTTY is a free Telnet and SSH client. It has been
 reported that PuTTY is subject to a pre-authentication buffer
 overflow that can allow malicious servers to execute code on a client
 machine as it attempts to negotiate connection. PuTTY 0.54 and
 previous versions are vulnerable.
 Ref:
 http://www.coresecurity.com/common/showdoc.php?idx=417idxseccion=10

You forgot to include this (from the link above):

*Solution/Vendor Information/Workaround:*

PuTTY 0.55 fixes these vulnerabilities. It is available at: 
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/download.html 

PuTTY maintainers recommend that everybody upgrade to 0.55 as soon as 
possible.
--

The latest PuTTY version in ports is 0.55.

- jt
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


802.1x

2004-08-16 Thread Cubicool
I will be attending college in a few weeks. The network at this uni requires
802.1x authentication over wireless connections. I've scoured google all
over and discovered Open1x--which has openly dropped all BSD support--and a
guy who has ported Open1x, but only on wired connections. I'm a decent
programmer in some regards, but not so much C/system code, so it's not like
I could just make the neccesary adjustments and recompile. :)

Is 802.1x supported on FreeBSD yet? I know I can build open1x on a Linux
box, but that is my ABSOLUTE LATE resort. I really want to keep using
FreeBSD, but if I can't access the school's network I won't be able to
continue doing so.

What's the status of this in FreeBSD, including the upcoming 5.3? Am I just
out of luck?

Regards,

Cubicool
--
http://www.the-bob.org/~jlmoles
--
AIM: cubicool
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IRC: cubicool :: irc.openprojects.net
--
If the automobile had followed the same development cycle as the computer,
a Rolls-Royce would today cost $100, get a million miles per gallon, and
explode once a year, killing everyone inside. - Robert X. Cringely.

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Help me ObwanKnobi your my only hope.

2004-08-16 Thread Paul Mather
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 14:11:14 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I have spent many usless hours looking at Freebsd.org, google.com and 
 yahoo.com in an attempt to find a ftpd that I can cap / choke the 
 outgoing bandwith.
 
 Do you know of any such animals?

Yes, ProFTPD (ftp/proftpd in ports) will let you do this flexibly.  See
the TransferRate directive used in proftpd.conf for details.  (E.g.,
http://www.proftpd.org/docs/directives/linked/config_ref_TransferRate.html)

Cheers,

Paul.
-- 
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Without music to decorate it, time is just a bunch of boring production
 deadlines or dates by which bills must be paid.
--- Frank Vincent Zappa

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [OT] Security hole in PuTTY (Windows ssh client)

2004-08-16 Thread stheg olloydson
it was said:

 I think what you are saying is that if you use PuTTY as a client 
 application that you should be concerned about what server you 
 connect to?  From what you are saying, I suspect that if the only 
 use is to connect to your own (FreeBSD) server, you are probably ok?
 
 Jay O'Brien

Hello,

To quote from the link:

In SSH2, an attacker impersonating a trusted host can launch an attack
before the client has the ability to determine the difference between
the trusted and fake host. This attack is performed before host key
verification.


Presuming one were connecting over private network IP space by IP
address only, then I believe you are correct. I can imagine scenarios
in which if one were to connect over the Internet or even into a
different network segment using DNS that one would be at risk. 
The vendor has a patched the hole and released 0.55, recommending all
users update. If I were using this software, I would take their advice.

Note: Apparently, a Unix version exists, and the source code is
available under the MIT Licence. So I guess my post was completely
OT.


HTH,

Stheg



__
Do you Yahoo!?
Y! Messenger - Communicate in real time. Download now. 
http://messenger.yahoo.com
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


filesystem full on install

2004-08-16 Thread Ryan Lamb
I'm trying to install FreeBSD for the first time but I am having an error 
that I can't figure out.  I have googled for an answer and read mailing list 
posts but still can't find what I'm looking for.  First, when the disk boots 
and checks the hardware, it does something strange to my network card that 
makes my router light turn yellow instead of green indicating 10 Mbps mode 
instead of 100.  Anyway, once I get ready to do the install, it can't 
contact the ftp site, it just stays forever at connecting but it does change 
my network card back so the router light is green.  If I do a control c to 
cancel it and restart installation, I can contact the site.  However, when 
it starts to install, it fails saying the filesystem is full.  This can't 
be.  It's a 40Gb drive.  I started by overwriting my hd using a utility 
called boot and nuke.  Then I allocated the whole thing to freebsd and made 
that partition bootable.  Then in disklabel, I hit a to do a default 
setup.  I've tried several different things in disklabel and I wipe my disk 
clean between each try and nothing seems to work.  Any help would be 
appreciated.  Thanks.

_
Check out Election 2004 for up-to-date election news, plus voter tools and 
more! http://special.msn.com/msn/election2004.armx

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Frequent crashes with Mozilla and Firefox

2004-08-16 Thread Jesse Sheidlower
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 12:51:36PM -0700, Your Name wrote:
 In the last few weeks ive started getting a number of
 crashes using either Mozilla or Firefox. im using the 
 newest version of each from Ports, on FreeBSD 4.9.

Sorry for the me too post, but since people are reporting
different results: I have two main computers, one running
4.10 and one running 5.2-CURRENT, but with otherwise
similar setups. GNOME in both cases.

The CURRENT machine is fine; I'm pretty sure I've never had a
crash in several months of operation. The 4.10 machine is
similar to the OP's report: I get relatively frequent but
unpredictable crashes on complex Web pages, with both
Mozilla and Firefox.

It's annoying, and I'd love to know causes and solutions!

Jesse Sheidlower
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


How to start clean install again?

2004-08-16 Thread Jay O'Brien
What's the best way to erase an installation of FreeBSD 
completely from a HD and start over? I'm installing 4.10 
from am ISO CD, and it installs fine. However, I would 
like to start over from scratch and it remembers some 
of what was on the HD from the last install. If I were 
in Windows/DOS I would just format C: but that doesn't 
seem to be an option here.

Jay O'Brien
Rio Linda, CA  USA

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: ProFTPd: 229 Entering Extended Passive Mode

2004-08-16 Thread Andras Kende


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aaron Dalton
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 4:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ProFTPd: 229 Entering Extended Passive Mode

As a follow-up, this happens even if I replace ProFTPd with the built-in
ftpd 
via inetd.  How do I eliminate this delay?

Cheers!
-- 
Aaron Dalton
http://aaron.daltons.ca
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]






Aaron,



Is there a firewall running on that system or between server and client?



Andras Kende
http://www.kende.com



___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: How to start clean install again?

2004-08-16 Thread Andras Kende


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jay O'Brien
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 8:21 PM
To: FreeBSD - questions
Subject: How to start clean install again?

What's the best way to erase an installation of FreeBSD 
completely from a HD and start over? I'm installing 4.10 
from am ISO CD, and it installs fine. However, I would 
like to start over from scratch and it remembers some 
of what was on the HD from the last install. If I were 
in Windows/DOS I would just format C: but that doesn't 
seem to be an option here.

Jay O'Brien
Rio Linda, CA  USA

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]






Jay,


Boot from CD as usual at 
When displaying the hard disk with FreeBSD slice click on Delete key...
Then just recreate the partition as before...

Andras Kende
http://www.kende.com



___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: How to start clean install again?

2004-08-16 Thread Bill Moran
Jay O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 What's the best way to erase an installation of FreeBSD 
 completely from a HD and start over? I'm installing 4.10 
 from am ISO CD, and it installs fine. However, I would 
 like to start over from scratch and it remembers some 
 of what was on the HD from the last install. If I were 
 in Windows/DOS I would just format C: but that doesn't 
 seem to be an option here.

During the reinstall, when it comes time to slice the disk with fdisk,
simply delete the previous slice and recreate it.  That will blow away
anything that existed before.

-- 
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Vinum in -CURRENT (was: Vinum panic on boot)

2004-08-16 Thread Greg 'groggy' Lehey
On Thursday,  8 July 2004 at  2:21:30 -0500, Mario Doria wrote:
 Hi,

 Another vinum question. I have a machine running 5-CURRENT sources from
 yesterday (yes I know the dangers of running CURRENT and I did read the
 mailing list archives). 

Well, the issue was discussed there.

 I think I found a bug, if I add start_vinum=YES to /etc/rc.conf,
 at boot I get a panic with a message saying:

 panic: vinum: dangling vnode snip

 Im sorry I do not have the complete message, it is the machine I am using
 as a gateway and I prefered to get online and find some more information.
 I'd be happy to compile a debugging kernel if necessary.

Well, is the least that people will ask of you when running -CURRENT.
But since this problem has already been reported, there's no longer
much point.

The current status of Vinum in -CURRENT is that it is being
rewritten.  The introduction of the GEOM layer has badly broken Vinum,
and it has been decided better to rewrite it than to fix it.  It'll be
a while before it's smooth again.

Greg
--
When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients.
If you don't, I may ignore the reply or reply to the original recipients.
For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html
Note: I discard all HTML mail unseen.
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for PGP public key.
See complete headers for address and phone numbers.


pgpxH9bTWbfku.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: ProFTPd: 229 Entering Extended Passive Mode

2004-08-16 Thread Aaron Dalton
On August 16, 2004 07:24 pm, Andras Kende wrote:
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aaron Dalton
 Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 4:05 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: ProFTPd: 229 Entering Extended Passive Mode

Is there a firewall running on that system or between server and client?

There is indeed and I finally found an article that speaks about it.  The 
solution was for me to manually enter the passive command before 
transferring.  This is odd seeing as it says it's entering some form of 
passive mode, but it's really not.  What's even more odd is that for me to 
make Konqueror work with this server, I had to go to KControl and turn PASV 
ftp mode OFF!  Go figure.  Anyway, it seems to work now.

Cheers!
-- 
Aaron Dalton
http://aaron.daltons.ca
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Help me ObwanKnobi your my only hope.

2004-08-16 Thread Vulpes Velox
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 15:33:56 -0700
Brooks Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 02:11:14PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  I have spent many usless hours looking at Freebsd.org, google.com
  and yahoo.com in an attempt to find a ftpd that I can cap / choke
  the outgoing bandwith.
  
  Do you know of any such animals?
 
 dummynet(4) will probably do what you want unless you need to do it
 per user.

Can be done if you use inetd. Just set up a rule limiting certian
users to certian pipes. :)
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


  1   2   >