Re: About suidperl in FreeBSD
Alberto == Alberto Mijares amijar...@gmail.com writes: Alberto Hi, Alberto I'm using 8.2-RELEASE Alberto I need suidperl for openwebmail. I include If openwebmail requires it, openwebmail is the problem. suidperl made sense long before sudo came around. Now that we have sudo, use it! -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 mer...@stonehenge.com URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/ Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Error during boot-up
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 15:44:37 -0400 Jerry je...@seibercom.net wrote: From time to time when booting up or rebooting on of my FreeBSD-8.2 amd 64 machines, the following error message is displayed ad infinitum: nfe0: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 0 pkt len 0) All I can do is repeatedly hit CTRL+C until the log-on screen appears. Then log-in as root and reboot. Sometimes this works and sometimes it doesn't. The same phenomena may happen repeatedly 10 times or more or suddenly just disappear. I have tried using ifconfig to bring the network up when this happens but it fails. Only a reboot seems to make any difference. I am at a loss to figure out how to correct this problem or even what is causing it. It just suddenly started approximately three months ago. I have changed routers so I think I can safely eliminate that as the source of the problem. None of my Windows machines have ever complained about this so I am wondering if it isn't local to FreeBSD. I think the problem first manifested itself after updating to the 8.2 version since I do not remember it happening prior to that. Have you ruled out a possible hardware problem (defect, interface going bad)? -- Conrad J. Sabatier conr...@cox.net ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [0.5 OT] Looking for recommendation on Unix shell account
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 22:04:17 -0500 Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: I looked briefly one night at SDF.org. http://sdf.org/?join For a contribution of, like, $1.00, you get full access, and I suspect that they're running FreeBSD (I haven't actually paid to see, but among the list of commands that *would* be available as a full member, I noticed pkg_info). It's NetBSD ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Printing using CUPS
On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 06:59:42 +0200 Matthias Apitz articulated: El día Friday, September 30, 2011 a las 04:57:14PM -0400, Carmel escribió: I am in the process of setting up a Brother MFC-9560CDW printer on a FreeBSD-8.2 amd64 machine. It is a network printer and works fine with the Windows machines on the network. Not so much with the FreeBSD machine. CUPS detects the printer: Description:Brother MFC-9560CDW Location: Local Printer Driver: Brother MFC-9560CDW CUPS (color, 2-sided printing) Connection: lpd://BRW0022587025CB/BINARY_P1 Defaults: job-sheets=none, none media=na_letter_8.5x11in sides=one-sided However, the connection does not work correctly. I changed it to:lpd://192.168.1.100/BINARY_P1 and I can print a self text page from CUPS. However, I cannot print a test page from within CUPS, nor can I print anything from any other application. I have perused the log files without any success. This limited printing has got me totally baffled. I am open to suggestions as to what to try next. While configuring the printer in CUPS, have you used some PPD file? If so, check the PPD file which filter it will use. Set also the LogLevel to 'debug' in cupsd.conf, print a text file and check the messages in CUPS' log file. This is the beginning of the *.ppd file: *% *% Copyright(C) 2010 Brother Industries, Ltd. *% Brother MFC-9560CDW CUPS *% *% General Information Keywords *FormatVersion: 4.3 *FileVersion: 1.1.3 *LanguageVersion: English *LanguageEncoding: ISOLatin1 *PCFileName: MFC9560W.PPD *Manufacturer: Brother *Product: (MFC-9560CDW) *1284DeviceID: MFG:Brother;MDL:MFC-9560CDW *cupsVersion: 1.1 *cupsManualCopies: false *cupsFilter: application/vnd.cups-postscript 0 brlpdwrappermfc9560cdw *cupsModelNumber: 4 *ModelName: Brother MFC-9560CDW *ShortNickName: MFC-9560CDW *NickName: Brother MFC-9560CDW CUPS *PSVersion: (3010.106) 3 There is no brlpdwrappermfc9560cdw file located on this unit if that is what you are looking for. This has really got me stumped. -- Carmel ✌ carmel...@hotmail.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Printing using CUPS
El día Saturday, October 01, 2011 a las 08:08:59AM -0400, Carmel escribió: This is the beginning of the *.ppd file: *% *% Copyright(C) 2010 Brother Industries, Ltd. *% Brother MFC-9560CDW CUPS *% *% General Information Keywords *FormatVersion: 4.3 *FileVersion: 1.1.3 *LanguageVersion: English *LanguageEncoding: ISOLatin1 *PCFileName: MFC9560W.PPD *Manufacturer: Brother *Product: (MFC-9560CDW) *1284DeviceID: MFG:Brother;MDL:MFC-9560CDW *cupsVersion: 1.1 *cupsManualCopies: false *cupsFilter: application/vnd.cups-postscript 0 brlpdwrappermfc9560cdw *cupsModelNumber: 4 *ModelName: Brother MFC-9560CDW *ShortNickName: MFC-9560CDW *NickName: Brother MFC-9560CDW CUPS *PSVersion: (3010.106) 3 There is no brlpdwrappermfc9560cdw file located on this unit if that is what you are looking for. This has really got me stumped. Delete the printer in CUPS and configure it as Generic Postscript (without using the PPD file); it should work; HIH matthias -- Matthias Apitz t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 e g...@unixarea.de - w http://www.unixarea.de/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Printing using CUPS
On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 14:19:15 +0200 Matthias Apitz articulated: El día Saturday, October 01, 2011 a las 08:08:59AM -0400, Carmel escribió: This is the beginning of the *.ppd file: *% *% Copyright(C) 2010 Brother Industries, Ltd. *% Brother MFC-9560CDW CUPS *% *% General Information Keywords *FormatVersion: 4.3 *FileVersion: 1.1.3 *LanguageVersion: English *LanguageEncoding: ISOLatin1 *PCFileName: MFC9560W.PPD *Manufacturer: Brother *Product: (MFC-9560CDW) *1284DeviceID: MFG:Brother;MDL:MFC-9560CDW *cupsVersion: 1.1 *cupsManualCopies: false *cupsFilter: application/vnd.cups-postscript 0 brlpdwrappermfc9560cdw *cupsModelNumber: 4 *ModelName: Brother MFC-9560CDW *ShortNickName: MFC-9560CDW *NickName: Brother MFC-9560CDW CUPS *PSVersion: (3010.106) 3 There is no brlpdwrappermfc9560cdw file located on this unit if that is what you are looking for. This has really got me stumped. Delete the printer in CUPS and configure it as Generic Postscript (without using the PPD file); it should work; It works, but only as a generic B/W printer. The problem seems to be in the cupswrappermfc9560cdw file i got when I downloaded the Debian drivers. That paths are all different and I am not really experienced enough to figure out the scripting to change it to work correctly. Maybe I can hire someone to modify the script to point to the correct locations for the files involved. -- Carmel ✌ carmel...@hotmail.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
top: how to obtain which process take CPU time
hi, Freebsd-questions. last pid: 92665; load averages: 2.40, 2.68, 4.75up 5+02:45:23 20:29:07 218 processes: 3 running, 215 sleeping CPU: 59.6% user, 0.0% nice, 40.4% system, 0.0% interrupt, 0.0% idle Mem: 225M Active, 81M Inact, 115M Wired, 3936K Cache, 60M Buf, 64M Free Swap: 2048M Total, 190M Used, 1857M Free, 9% Inuse PID USERNAMETHR PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPU COMMAND 92520 cacti 1 -80 22796K 12656K piperd 0:00 1.46% php 92593 cacti 1 -80 4620K 2316K piperd 0:00 1.46% perl5.8.8 92594 cacti 1 80 3460K 1120K wait 0:00 1.46% sh 92592 cacti 1 80 3460K 1120K wait 0:00 1.46% sh 92595 cacti 1 550 5448K 2692K select 0:00 1.37% snmpget 92518 cacti 1 80 23820K 12896K nanslp 0:00 0.98% php 92528 cacti 1 -80 22796K 12640K piperd 0:00 0.98% php 92555 cacti 1 -80 4620K 2332K piperd 0:00 0.98% perl5.8.8 92556 root 1 960 3280K 1292K select 0:00 0.98% sudo 92554 cacti 1 80 3460K 1120K wait 0:00 0.98% sh 92542 cacti 1 80 3460K 1128K wait 0:00 0.98% sh 92543 cacti 1 -80 10200K 3664K piperd 0:00 0.78% rrdtool 81166 firebird 1 450 23344K 6188K select 0:08 0.49% fb_inet_serve top -SIHP last pid: 99336; load averages: 1.47, 2.05, 3.66up 5+02:52:06 20:35:50 291 processes: 6 running, 266 sleeping, 18 waiting, 1 lock CPU: 52.2% user, 0.0% nice, 27.9% system, 0.0% interrupt, 19.9% idle Mem: 236M Active, 81M Inact, 115M Wired, 3436K Cache, 60M Buf, 54M Free Swap: 2048M Total, 189M Used, 1858M Free, 9% Inuse PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPU COMMAND 11 root 171 ki31 0K 8K RUN 70.1H 27.59% idle: cpu0 98502 cacti80 23820K 12932K nanslp 0:00 0.20% php 44054 root 80 3124K 524K nanslp 0:56 0.10% monitord 99051 root440 3496K 2020K RUN 0:00 0.10% top 99331 cacti -80 4620K 2332K piperd 0:00 0.00% perl5.8.8 99326 cacti -80 4620K 2332K piperd 0:00 0.00% perl5.8.8 99333 root460 3240K 1008K select 0:00 0.00% ping 99328 root450 3240K 972K select 0:00 0.00% ping 99332 root470 3280K 1292K select 0:00 0.00% sudo 99327 root470 3280K 1292K select 0:00 0.00% sudo It is unclear which process take CPU time. is there any other tool, which help me to see processes that take CPU? -- С уважением, Коньков mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
PGP or GPG
Can anyone think of any compelling reasons why PGP should be used instead of GPG? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: top: how to obtain which process take CPU time
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2011 20:38:49 +0300 From: =?windows-1251?B?yu7t/Oru4iDF4uPl7ejp?= kes-...@yandex.ru To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: top: how to obtain which process take CPU time [[.. sneck ..]] It is unclear which process take CPU time. is there any other tool, which help me to see processes that take CPU? One -obvious- anwser is the 'ps' commnd. Something like 'ps gxua. You may want to run it more than once, and look at the differences in the TIME field. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: PGP or GPG
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Sat Oct 1 12:50:11 2011 Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2011 10:39:58 -0700 From: Colin Barnabas a...@ucs.com To: FreeBSD Questions freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: PGP or GPG Can anyone think of any compelling reasons why PGP should be used instead of GPG? You don't like the Gnu license? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: top: how to obtain which process take CPU time
On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 08:38:49PM +0300, ??? ??? wrote: hi, Freebsd-questions. last pid: 92665; load averages: 2.40, 2.68, 4.75up 5+02:45:23 20:29:07 218 processes: 3 running, 215 sleeping CPU: 59.6% user, 0.0% nice, 40.4% system, 0.0% interrupt, 0.0% idle Mem: 225M Active, 81M Inact, 115M Wired, 3936K Cache, 60M Buf, 64M Free Swap: 2048M Total, 190M Used, 1857M Free, 9% Inuse PID USERNAMETHR PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPU COMMAND 92520 cacti 1 -80 22796K 12656K piperd 0:00 1.46% php 92593 cacti 1 -80 4620K 2316K piperd 0:00 1.46% perl5.8.8 92594 cacti 1 80 3460K 1120K wait 0:00 1.46% sh 92592 cacti 1 80 3460K 1120K wait 0:00 1.46% sh 92595 cacti 1 550 5448K 2692K select 0:00 1.37% snmpget 92518 cacti 1 80 23820K 12896K nanslp 0:00 0.98% php 92528 cacti 1 -80 22796K 12640K piperd 0:00 0.98% php 92555 cacti 1 -80 4620K 2332K piperd 0:00 0.98% perl5.8.8 92556 root 1 960 3280K 1292K select 0:00 0.98% sudo 92554 cacti 1 80 3460K 1120K wait 0:00 0.98% sh 92542 cacti 1 80 3460K 1128K wait 0:00 0.98% sh 92543 cacti 1 -80 10200K 3664K piperd 0:00 0.78% rrdtool 81166 firebird 1 450 23344K 6188K select 0:08 0.49% fb_inet_serve That looks to me like quite a weak system and has got 3 running processes and 215 sleeping. I can easily see that 59.6% of your CPU is being used and your load averages being as they are. top -SIHP last pid: 99336; load averages: 1.47, 2.05, 3.66up 5+02:52:06 20:35:50 291 processes: 6 running, 266 sleeping, 18 waiting, 1 lock CPU: 52.2% user, 0.0% nice, 27.9% system, 0.0% interrupt, 19.9% idle Mem: 236M Active, 81M Inact, 115M Wired, 3436K Cache, 60M Buf, 54M Free Swap: 2048M Total, 189M Used, 1858M Free, 9% Inuse PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPU COMMAND 11 root 171 ki31 0K 8K RUN 70.1H 27.59% idle: cpu0 98502 cacti80 23820K 12932K nanslp 0:00 0.20% php 44054 root 80 3124K 524K nanslp 0:56 0.10% monitord 99051 root440 3496K 2020K RUN 0:00 0.10% top 99331 cacti -80 4620K 2332K piperd 0:00 0.00% perl5.8.8 99326 cacti -80 4620K 2332K piperd 0:00 0.00% perl5.8.8 99333 root460 3240K 1008K select 0:00 0.00% ping 99328 root450 3240K 972K select 0:00 0.00% ping 99332 root470 3280K 1292K select 0:00 0.00% sudo 99327 root470 3280K 1292K select 0:00 0.00% sudo It is unclear which process take CPU time. is there any other tool, which help me to see processes that take CPU? I don't think another tool would help. You've just got a weak system running lots of processes. None very big but they all add up to quite a big chunk of CPU. It looks like it's handling it OK though. Regards, -- Frank Contact info: http://www.shute.org.uk/misc/contact.html pgpQUESt9mjgI.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re[2]: top: how to obtain which process take CPU time
Здравствуйте, Frank. Вы писали 1 октября 2011 г., 21:38:56: FS On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 08:38:49PM +0300, ??? ??? wrote: hi, Freebsd-questions. last pid: 92665; load averages: 2.40, 2.68, 4.75up 5+02:45:23 20:29:07 218 processes: 3 running, 215 sleeping CPU: 59.6% user, 0.0% nice, 40.4% system, 0.0% interrupt, 0.0% idle Mem: 225M Active, 81M Inact, 115M Wired, 3936K Cache, 60M Buf, 64M Free Swap: 2048M Total, 190M Used, 1857M Free, 9% Inuse PID USERNAMETHR PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPU COMMAND 92520 cacti 1 -80 22796K 12656K piperd 0:00 1.46% php 92593 cacti 1 -80 4620K 2316K piperd 0:00 1.46% perl5.8.8 92594 cacti 1 80 3460K 1120K wait 0:00 1.46% sh 92592 cacti 1 80 3460K 1120K wait 0:00 1.46% sh 92595 cacti 1 550 5448K 2692K select 0:00 1.37% snmpget 92518 cacti 1 80 23820K 12896K nanslp 0:00 0.98% php 92528 cacti 1 -80 22796K 12640K piperd 0:00 0.98% php 92555 cacti 1 -80 4620K 2332K piperd 0:00 0.98% perl5.8.8 92556 root 1 960 3280K 1292K select 0:00 0.98% sudo 92554 cacti 1 80 3460K 1120K wait 0:00 0.98% sh 92542 cacti 1 80 3460K 1128K wait 0:00 0.98% sh 92543 cacti 1 -80 10200K 3664K piperd 0:00 0.78% rrdtool 81166 firebird 1 450 23344K 6188K select 0:08 0.49% fb_inet_serve FS That looks to me like quite a weak system and has got 3 running FS processes and 215 sleeping. I can easily see that 59.6% of your CPU is FS being used and your load averages being as they are. I see that too, but which process take that CPU? top -SIHP last pid: 99336; load averages: 1.47, 2.05, 3.66up 5+02:52:06 20:35:50 291 processes: 6 running, 266 sleeping, 18 waiting, 1 lock CPU: 52.2% user, 0.0% nice, 27.9% system, 0.0% interrupt, 19.9% idle Mem: 236M Active, 81M Inact, 115M Wired, 3436K Cache, 60M Buf, 54M Free Swap: 2048M Total, 189M Used, 1858M Free, 9% Inuse PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPU COMMAND 11 root 171 ki31 0K 8K RUN 70.1H 27.59% idle: cpu0 98502 cacti80 23820K 12932K nanslp 0:00 0.20% php 44054 root 80 3124K 524K nanslp 0:56 0.10% monitord 99051 root440 3496K 2020K RUN 0:00 0.10% top 99331 cacti -80 4620K 2332K piperd 0:00 0.00% perl5.8.8 99326 cacti -80 4620K 2332K piperd 0:00 0.00% perl5.8.8 99333 root460 3240K 1008K select 0:00 0.00% ping 99328 root450 3240K 972K select 0:00 0.00% ping 99332 root470 3280K 1292K select 0:00 0.00% sudo 99327 root470 3280K 1292K select 0:00 0.00% sudo It is unclear which process take CPU time. is there any other tool, which help me to see processes that take CPU? FS I don't think another tool would help. You've just got a weak system FS running lots of processes. None very big but they all add up to quite FS a big chunk of CPU. It looks like it's handling it OK though. No. it is not weak. it is about 40% load averages, but somethig is happen and take of 100% CPU (see SNMP graph). And I got a problem in FreeBSD I can not obtain which process take all CPU (( Robert Bonomi bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com It is unclear which process take CPU time. is there any other tool, which help me to see processes that take CPU? One -obvious- anwser is the 'ps' commnd. Something like 'ps gxua. You mean that 'ps gxua' shows wrong results? FS Regards,___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: PGP or GPG
In article 20111001173958.GA30989@hs1.VERBENA you write: Can anyone think of any compelling reasons why PGP should be used instead of GPG? The GNU copyleft can be a deal killer in some applications. R's, John ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: PGP or GPG
Quite the opposite. I would prefer to use GPG. I was just curious if there were any reasons why PGP should be used instead. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: PGP or GPG
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Sat Oct 1 16:51:43 2011 Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2011 14:51:52 -0700 From: Colin Barnabas a...@ucs.com To: Robert Bonomi bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com Cc: FreeBSD Questions freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PGP or GPG Quite the opposite. I would prefer to use GPG. I was just curious if there were any reasons why PGP should be used instead. I might suggest PGP keeps the context of messages you're replying to. But that *obviously* isn't a considertion for you. *wry*grin* ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
what are the plain GUI text editors that use the abbrev [as in vi]?
several months ago i asked this list if there were any =easier= text editors than vi[m] that had the abbrev ability. ab u you ab r are ab thz these ab plz please etc. now that i have my key-click program working--however tententively-- it is time to work on the rest of my 'speech computer' suite. IIRC, there was at least one--like kate--that was able to use abbreviations and help those folk who cannot type fast and/or who are hunt-andd-pek type typist [like me] who never take their eyes off the keyboard. i plan on using gvim ((maybe)) and one GUI type editor. i'm also requesting ideas. as many as you guys are willing to share. tia, gary -- Gary Kline kl...@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix Journey Toward the Dawn, E-Book: http://www.thought.org The 8.51a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: top: how to obtain which process take CPU time
In the last episode (Oct 01), ??? ??? said: hi, Freebsd-questions. last pid: 92665; load averages: 2.40, 2.68, 4.75up 5+02:45:23 20:29:07 218 processes: 3 running, 215 sleeping CPU: 59.6% user, 0.0% nice, 40.4% system, 0.0% interrupt, 0.0% idle Mem: 225M Active, 81M Inact, 115M Wired, 3936K Cache, 60M Buf, 64M Free Swap: 2048M Total, 190M Used, 1857M Free, 9% Inuse PID USERNAMETHR PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPU COMMAND 92520 cacti 1 -80 22796K 12656K piperd 0:00 1.46% php 92593 cacti 1 -80 4620K 2316K piperd 0:00 1.46% perl5.8.8 92594 cacti 1 80 3460K 1120K wait 0:00 1.46% sh 92592 cacti 1 80 3460K 1120K wait 0:00 1.46% sh 92595 cacti 1 550 5448K 2692K select 0:00 1.37% snmpget top -SIHP last pid: 99336; load averages: 1.47, 2.05, 3.66up 5+02:52:06 20:35:50 291 processes: 6 running, 266 sleeping, 18 waiting, 1 lock CPU: 52.2% user, 0.0% nice, 27.9% system, 0.0% interrupt, 19.9% idle Mem: 236M Active, 81M Inact, 115M Wired, 3436K Cache, 60M Buf, 54M Free Swap: 2048M Total, 189M Used, 1858M Free, 9% Inuse PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPU COMMAND 11 root 171 ki31 0K 8K RUN 70.1H 27.59% idle: cpu0 98502 cacti80 23820K 12932K nanslp 0:00 0.20% php 44054 root 80 3124K 524K nanslp 0:56 0.10% monitord 99051 root440 3496K 2020K RUN 0:00 0.10% top 99331 cacti -80 4620K 2332K piperd 0:00 0.00% perl5.8.8 99326 cacti -80 4620K 2332K piperd 0:00 0.00% perl5.8.8 It is unclear which process take CPU time. is there any other tool, which help me to see processes that take CPU? Take a look at the last pid values and the time of each top snapshot: last pid: 92665; load averages: 2.40, 2.68, 4.75up 5+02:45:23 20:29:07 last pid: 99336; load averages: 1.47, 2.05, 3.66up 5+02:52:06 20:35:50 So, in 7 minutes your system has launched 6671 processes, and in your first top snapshot I see sh and snmpget processses. The reason you don't see any processes in top consuming CPU is that they are being created and then exit before top can print them. If you turn process accounting on (add accounting_enable=YES to /etc/rc.conf, then run /etc/rc.d.d/accounting start), you can run the lastcomm command to see a log of every process that has exited and its CPU usage. It won't really tell you any more than you are running Cacti and monitoring a lot of devices :) -- Dan Nelson dnel...@allantgroup.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Help with devd.conf
On Saturday 24 September 2011 07:04:18 Rod Person wrote:
I'm trying to understand devd.conf to auto mount usb devices. For
example I have a usb drive that will show up as da1 so as a test I just
want to write something to syslog when it is plugged in.
This is what I have tried in devd.conf:
notify 20{
match system DEVFS;
match subsystem CDEV;
match typeCREATE;
match cdevda[1-9]+;
action logger you plugged in some usb device;
};
notify 20{
match system USB;
match subsytemDEVICE;
match typeATTACH;
action logger some type of usb thing attached;
};
I do not belive that the values of that variables are in upper case
To see what is happening in devd, try this
Create the file /usr/local/etc/devd/printvar.conf with
=
#
# Run devd in debug mode
# devd -Dd
#
attach 0 {
device-name umass[0-9]+;
action /usr/local/etc/devd/printvar.sh '$bus' '$cdev' '$cisproduct'
'$cisvendor' '$class' '$device' '$device-name' '$function' '$manufacturer'
'$notify' '$product' '$serial' '$slot' '$subvendor' '$subdevice' '$subsystem'
'$system' '$type' '$vendor';
};
=
Also, creat the file Create the file /usr/local/etc/devd/printvar.sh
=
#!/bin/sh
{
echo $# parametros
echo $@
echo bus = $1
echo cdev = $2
echo cisproduct = $3
echo cisvendor= $4
echo class= $5
echo device = $6
echo device-name = $7
echo function = $8
echo manufacturer = $9
shift 9
echo notify = $1
echo product = $2
echo serial = $3
echo slot = $4
echo subvendor= $5
echo subdevice= $6
echo subsystem= $7
echo system = $8
echo type = $9
shift 1
echo vendor = $9
} /tmp/VariablesDevd.txt
=
Check the content of /tmp/VariablesDevd.txt
You can also try this other advise for auto mount
http://networking.ringofsaturn.com/Unix/freebsdautomount.php
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
