Re: umodem/ppp/3g stopped working after update from 9.0-RELEASE to 9-STABLE
El día Friday, June 29, 2012 a las 08:02:17AM +0200, vermaden escribió: > > I said this already: the /etc/ppp/ppp.conf file you are > > using is completely broken and the log matches this; > > > > what should these AT cmds do in the section of 3g: > > > > 3g: > > set device /dev/cuaU0 > > set speed 38400 > > set ifaddr 10.0.0.1/0 10.0.0.2/0 255.255.255.255 0.0.0.0 > > add default HISADDR > > term > > AT+CFUN=1 > > AT+CGDCONT=1,"IP","www.plusgsm.pl" > > ATD*99# > > > > matthias > > I did not knew that its broken, I used the '3g' > profile to connect, like that: # ppp -ddial 3g > > It worked very well without errors on 9.0-RELEASE > and it stopped working after the update to the > 9-STABLE, what is broken there? I can't imagine that 9-STABLE delivers such a broken file (already because the "www.plusgsm.pl" entry in your file); I do not know how you did the update and if maybe this is the result of some kind of broken merging; I'm attaching the original file out of SVM (CURRENT) and mine which have a working entry 'umts'; try to rebuild from both a workin one by hand; matthias -- Matthias Apitz e - w http://www.unixarea.de/ UNIX since V7 on PDP-11, UNIX on mainframe since ESER 1055 (IBM /370) UNIX on x86 since SVR4.2 UnixWare 2.1.2, FreeBSD since 2.2.5 # # PPP Sample Configuration File # Originally written by Toshiharu OHNO # Simplified 5/14/1999 by ws...@cdrom.com # # See /usr/share/examples/ppp/ for some examples # # $FreeBSD: head/etc/ppp/ppp.conf 203943 2010-02-16 01:07:06Z jkim $ # default: set log Phase Chat LCP IPCP CCP tun command ident user-ppp VERSION # Ensure that "device" references the correct serial port # for your modem. (cuau0 = COM1, cuau1 = COM2) # set device /dev/cuau1 set speed 115200 set dial "ABORT BUSY ABORT NO\\sCARRIER TIMEOUT 5 \ \"\" AT OK-AT-OK ATE1Q0 OK \\dATDT\\T TIMEOUT 40 CONNECT" set timeout 180# 3 minute idle timer (the default) enable dns # request DNS info (for resolv.conf) papchap: # # edit the next three lines and replace the items in caps with # the values which have been assigned by your ISP. # set phone PHONE_NUM set authname USERNAME set authkey PASSWORD set ifaddr 10.0.0.1/0 10.0.0.2/0 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.0 add default HISADDR# Add a (sticky) default route # # $Id: ppp.conf,v 1.1 2011/11/20 06:07:03 guru Exp $ # # APN (AT+CGDCONT value): pinternet.interkom.de # # # default: set log Phase Chat LCP IPCP CCP tun command umts: set device /dev/cuaU0.0 # device name in CURRENT set speed 921600 # set dial "ABORT BUSY ABORT NO\\sCARRIER TIMEOUT 5 \ \"\" AT OK-AT-OK ATZ OK \ AT+CFUN=1 OK \ AT+COPS=0 OK \ AT+CGDCONT=1,\\\"IP\\\",\\\"pinternet.interkom.de\\\" OK \ \\dATDT\\T TIMEOUT 40 CONNECT" set logout "ABORT BUSY ABORT ERROR TIMEOUT 30 \"\" +++ATH O ATH OK" # NAT (not used by me) # nat enable yes # alias enable yes # nat port tcp 192.168.0.0:ftp ftp # nat port tcp 192.168.0.0:http http nat enable yes nat port udp 127.0.0.1:1024-1030 1024-1030 nat port tcp 127.0.0.1:22 22 set phone *99*1\# set authname "x" set authkey "x" set timeout 300 set ifaddr 10.64.64.64/0 10.64.64.64/0 255.255.255.255 0.0.0.0 # add default HISADDR# Add a (sticky) default route enable dns disable ipv6cp # disable deflate # disable pred1 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: OT: Linux EXT4 dump/restore equivalent?
"Peter A. Giessel" responded: > According to: > http://www.sysresccd.org/Detailed-packages-list > It does not contain any version of restore. > There are a lot of Linux boot disks out there. I haven't found one yet that > includes an ext4 compatible restore. Debian lets you roll your own, but you > need to do that before a disaster. It doesn't include useful rescue CDs like > FreeBSD does. You could try http://www.sysresccd.org/System-tools Some recovery tools are listed, including FSArchiver and Partimage. Maybe one of those listed recovery tools might fit your need? Tom ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Anatomy of Perfomance tests
Hi, Can some body comment on these tests? http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=debian_wheezybsd_freeze&num=1 Are these tests skewed in some way to make Linux look better? Thanks --Siju ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Anatomy of Perfomance tests
Most probably all filesystems were used with defaults. MAYBE softupdates, but not even sure for this. Compare this to linux which is async-like. Comparing with UFS+async would be more fair. Still - FreeBSD default MAXPHYS in param.h is far too low. i change it to 2048*1024 (default is 128*1024) and improvement on handling large files is huge. I run that setting everywhere. No problems. I already talked about it on forum but was ignored. As for scientific processing it should not depend much from OS at all, but for sure it depends on crappy compiler that Juniper wanted... ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Anatomy of Perfomance tests
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > Most probably all filesystems were used with defaults. > > MAYBE softupdates, but not even sure for this. Compare this to linux which > is async-like. Comparing with UFS+async would be more fair. > > Still - FreeBSD default MAXPHYS in param.h is far too low. i change it to > 2048*1024 (default is 128*1024) and improvement on handling large files is > huge. I run that setting everywhere. No problems. > > I already talked about it on forum but was ignored. > > As for scientific processing it should not depend much from OS at all, but > for sure it depends on crappy compiler that Juniper wanted... > > > > ___ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" I would not worry too much about what this guy says. Judging from his interpretations of the plots, he doesn't seem to know much about the benchmarks he is running and why they behave that way on the different systems. I think he just runs and publishes everything that says benchmark on it, without truly understanding what's going on or even going through the effort of providing fair comparisons. That said, I think that the Linux kernel performs better simply due to wider adoption (larger developer base, wider set of use-cases, etc) and thus a higher chance of getting performance improvements. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Anatomy of Perfomance tests
when properly configured FreeBSD is quite good. if that company: http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTExNDM chose FreeBSD in spite of hype-overloaded linux it must be a reason. As well as it seems they know what they are doing, storage configuration is IMGO an example how such things should be done to get the best of. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: umodem/ppp/3g stopped working after update from 9.0-RELEASE to 9-STABLE
Thanks You, now I understand how badly it was broken (the config of course), I confirm that using the config You send everything works like a charm now, for the record, here is mine complete config: | default: | set log Phase Chat LCP IPCP CCP tun command | | 3g: | set device /dev/cuaU0 | set speed 921600 | | set dial "ABORT BUSY ABORT NO\\sCARRIER TIMEOUT 5 \ | \"\" AT OK-AT-OK \ | AT+CFUN=1 OK \ | AT+COPS=0 OK \ | AT+CGDCONT=1,\\\"IP\\\",\\\"www.plusgsm.pl\\\" OK \ | \dATDT\\T TIMEOUT 40 CONNECT" | | set logout "ABORT BUSY ABORT ERROR TIMEOUT 30 \"\" +++ATH O ATH OK" | | set phone *99\# | set timeout 300 | set ifaddr 10.64.64.64/0 10.64.64.64/0 255.255.255.255 0.0.0.0 | add default HISADDR | enable dns | disable ipv6cp I am going to send update to the PR to close it ;) Thanks again, vermaden "Matthias Apitz" pisze: > El día Friday, June 29, 2012 a las 08:02:17AM +0200, vermaden escribió: > > > > I said this already: the /etc/ppp/ppp.conf file you are > > > using is completely broken and the log matches this; > > > > > > what should these AT cmds do in the section of 3g: > > > > > > 3g: > > > set device /dev/cuaU0 > > > set speed 38400 > > > set ifaddr 10.0.0.1/0 10.0.0.2/0 255.255.255.255 0.0.0.0 > > > add default HISADDR > > > term > > > AT+CFUN=1 > > > AT+CGDCONT=1,"IP","www.plusgsm.pl" > > > ATD*99# > > > > > > matthias > > > > I did not knew that its broken, I used the '3g' > > profile to connect, like that: # ppp -ddial 3g > > > > It worked very well without errors on 9.0-RELEASE > > and it stopped working after the update to the > > 9-STABLE, what is broken there? > > I can't imagine that 9-STABLE delivers such a broken file (already > because the "www.plusgsm.pl" entry in your file); I do not know how you > did the update and if maybe this is the result of some kind of broken > merging; I'm attaching the original file out of SVM (CURRENT) and mine > which have a working entry 'umts'; try to rebuild from both a workin one > by hand; > > matthias > > -- > Matthias Apitz > e - w http://www.unixarea.de/ > UNIX since V7 on PDP-11, UNIX on mainframe since ESER 1055 (IBM /370) > UNIX on x86 since SVR4.2 UnixWare 2.1.2, FreeBSD since 2.2.5 > -- ... ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
sshd and Kerberos
Hello. I setup NIS, Kerberos and Kerberized NFS (v3) server. All the required daemons are running. /usr/home is exported from the server with sec=krb5i And there is a client machine. I uncommented these two lines in /etc/pam.d/system and sshd: authsufficient pam_krb5.so no_warn try_first_pass passwordsufficient pam_krb5.so no_warn try_first_pass Now, if I do a local login to the client (on the text console) everything works fine, I get the Kerberos tickets and have access to mounted /usr/home But if I ssh into the client from server I do log in, but I don't get any ticket and access to /usr/home is denied. How to make sshd pam module create Kerberos tickets on login? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Messages not reaching the lists
On 6/29/12 6:40 AM, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > Lately I've been noticing that almost without fail, any messages I send > to the FreeBSD mailing lists never actually appear on the list. > > Just wondering if maybe my ISP (cox.net) has been flagged as a known > spam source, or what? > > This is very strange! I'm still subscribed to all of the same lists > I've been on for quite some time, and am receiving the lists' mail just > fine. It's just my own messages that never show up here. > > We'll see if this one shows up. :-) > I've been experiencing the same issue for a long time. My messages are sent, people seem to actually receive them, but I don't, although my subscription options state that I should receive copies of my own messages. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Anatomy of Perfomance tests
On 06/29/2012 11:00, Fred Morcos wrote: On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote: Most probably all filesystems were used with defaults. MAYBE softupdates, but not even sure for this. Compare this to linux which is async-like. Comparing with UFS+async would be more fair. Still - FreeBSD default MAXPHYS in param.h is far too low. i change it to 2048*1024 (default is 128*1024) and improvement on handling large files is huge. I run that setting everywhere. No problems. I already talked about it on forum but was ignored. As for scientific processing it should not depend much from OS at all, but for sure it depends on crappy compiler that Juniper wanted... ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" I would not worry too much about what this guy says. Judging from his interpretations of the plots, he doesn't seem to know much about the benchmarks he is running and why they behave that way on the different systems. I think he just runs and publishes everything that says benchmark on it, without truly understanding what's going on or even going through the effort of providing fair comparisons. That said, I think that the Linux kernel performs better simply due to wider adoption (larger developer base, wider set of use-cases, etc) and thus a higher chance of getting performance improvements. Note that stability matters too. I remembered a bench on PostgreSQL where Linux was faster, but at some point the machine had to be rebooted because it became unresponsive. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" -- No trees were killed in the creation of this message. However, many electrons were terribly inconvenienced. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Messages not reaching the lists
On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 11:24:56 +0200, Damien Fleuriot wrote: > On 6/29/12 6:40 AM, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: >> Lately I've been noticing that almost without fail, any messages I send >> to the FreeBSD mailing lists never actually appear on the list. >> >> Just wondering if maybe my ISP (cox.net) has been flagged as a known >> spam source, or what? >> >> This is very strange! I'm still subscribed to all of the same lists >> I've been on for quite some time, and am receiving the lists' mail just >> fine. It's just my own messages that never show up here. >> >> We'll see if this one shows up. :-) >> >> > > I've been experiencing the same issue for a long time. > > My messages are sent, people seem to actually receive them, but I don't, > although my subscription options state that I should receive copies of > my own messages. I'm reading both your messages on gmane vi a newsreader (Pan) - my preferred method. No issues whatever. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Messages not reaching the lists
Damien Fleuriot wrote: > On 6/29/12 6:40 AM, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > > Lately I've been noticing that almost without fail, any messages I send > > to the FreeBSD mailing lists never actually appear on the list. > > > > We'll see if this one shows up. :-) > > I've been experiencing the same issue for a long time. > > My messages are sent, people seem to actually receive them, but I don't, > although my subscription options state that I should receive copies of > my own messages. One 'obvious' thing to try -- Change the options so as to _not_ get copies of your own messages. *SAVE* changes. Change the options back. Save again. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Messages not reaching the lists
On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 04:55:51 -0500 (CDT) Robert Bonomi wrote: > > Damien Fleuriot wrote: > > On 6/29/12 6:40 AM, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > > > Lately I've been noticing that almost without fail, any messages > > > I send to the FreeBSD mailing lists never actually appear on the > > > list. > > > > > > We'll see if this one shows up. :-) > > > > I've been experiencing the same issue for a long time. > > > > My messages are sent, people seem to actually receive them, but I > > don't, although my subscription options state that I should receive > > copies of my own messages. > > One 'obvious' thing to try -- > Change the options so as to _not_ get copies of your own messages. > *SAVE* changes. > Change the options back. > Save again. Yes, I went and checked my options for questions@ and saw at the top of the page that they had had a number of bounced e-mails from my address recently. My computer was down for about a week or so earlier this month (had to be repaired). I'm not sure what this means exactly in terms of how the list server manages my subscription, but perhaps it's being tentatively cautious and just not sending any of my list submissions back to me(?). I don't know. I didn't actually change any settings while I was there, but that might be worth a try. We'll see if that helps. -- Conrad J. Sabatier conr...@cox.net ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Anatomy of Perfomance tests
On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 11:40:37 +0200, Julien Cigar wrote: > On 06/29/2012 11:00, Fred Morcos wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Wojciech Puchar >> wrote: >>> Most probably all filesystems were used with defaults. >>> >>> MAYBE softupdates, but not even sure for this. Compare this to linux >>> which is async-like. Comparing with UFS+async would be more fair. >>> >>> Still - FreeBSD default MAXPHYS in param.h is far too low. i change it >>> to 2048*1024 (default is 128*1024) and improvement on handling large >>> files is huge. I run that setting everywhere. No problems. >>> >>> I already talked about it on forum but was ignored. >>> >>> As for scientific processing it should not depend much from OS at all, >>> but for sure it depends on crappy compiler that Juniper wanted... >>> >>> >>> >>> ___ >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To >>> unsubscribe, send any mail to >>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" >> I would not worry too much about what this guy says. Judging from his >> interpretations of the plots, he doesn't seem to know much about the >> benchmarks he is running and why they behave that way on the different >> systems. I think he just runs and publishes everything that says >> benchmark on it, without truly understanding what's going on or even >> going through the effort of providing fair comparisons. >> >> That said, I think that the Linux kernel performs better simply due to >> wider adoption (larger developer base, wider set of use-cases, etc) >> and thus a higher chance of getting performance improvements. > > Note that stability matters too. > I remembered a bench on PostgreSQL where Linux was faster, but at some > point the machine had to be rebooted because it became unresponsive. > Unscientific, anecdotal and entirely subjective, but here's my 2c. I run both FreeBSD and Linux on the same machine in a multi-boot configuration. Each has its default disk configuration (UFS + SJ vs. Ext4 with journalling). Linux is noticeably faster, but the performance of both is satisfactory, and I prefer FreeBSD. To echo Julien, benchmarks aren't everything. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Anatomy of Perfomance tests
At least he should have used one or at very least identical systems, not 3 different, albeit similar. And I do not care If it would change results or not, comparing different systems invalidates benchmarks period. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Anatomy-of-Perfomance-tests-tp5722932p5722964.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Anatomy of Perfomance tests
what i would like to see too is how these systems compare on such test: - run lots of heavy disk I/O tests, many different in the same time, including ones doing many writes to different places. - turn off power while doing this, by unplugging from wall plug. - compare amount of loss and destruction that happened to filesystem. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Anatomy of Perfomance tests
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > what i would like to see too is how these systems compare on such test: > > - run lots of heavy disk I/O tests, many different in the same time, > including ones doing many writes to different places. > > - turn off power while doing this, by unplugging from wall plug. > > - compare amount of loss and destruction that happened to filesystem. > > ___ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" It would be very interesting to see the results of stress-testing systems. I cannot think of a scenario that isn't possible with a virtual machine. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Messages not reaching the lists
On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 05:55:20 -0500 Conrad J. Sabatier articulated: > Yes, I went and checked my options for questions@ and saw at the top > of the page that they had had a number of bounced e-mails from my > address recently. My computer was down for about a week or so > earlier this month (had to be repaired). I'm not sure what this > means exactly in terms of how the list server manages my > subscription, but perhaps it's being tentatively cautious and just > not sending any of my list submissions back to me(?). I don't know. Now this is the reason that you should have had some sort of backup plan in place in case your mail server goes down. There are methods of handling this problem and I am sure if you started a new thread and requested help that many knowledgeable users would be willing to lend you their expertise. -- Jerry ♔ Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __ Revenge is a form of nostalgia. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Anatomy of Perfomance tests
That said, I think that the Linux kernel performs better simply due to wider adoption (larger developer base, wider set of use-cases, etc) and thus a higher chance of getting performance improvements. Note that stability matters too. of course - this is what i pointed out at first. the second is clear team managing a kernel, and support. What i recently get when getting FreeBSD crash problems is something that you'll not get from linux. It found out to be my fault. I would generally call properly configured FreeBSD as rock-stable. The filesystem performance was close, and comparing dangerous linux filesystem to UFS isn't good. i would recommend comparing -o async mounted UFS with that test. Second - i would like to see how responsive linux server is WHILE performing that tests ;) high latencies under load was a problem i always had with linux when still using it. But scientific computing task results are FreeBSD fault, and the some reason is clang compiler,. With recent gcc-recompiled binaries it would be similar result. Similar as with compute-bound processes OS doesn't have much to change. Maybe, if there were more threads run than available, scheduler could matter. And i think FreeBSD scheduler would clearly win. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
video buffer location
In contrast to firefox, there is no decent video download helper for opera. HOWTO find the video buffer location if it is not /tmp ? Thank you in advance, -- Harald Weis ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: OT: Linux EXT4 dump/restore equivalent?
On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 00:52:35 -0500, Peter A. Giessel wrote: There are a lot of Linux boot disks out there. I haven't found one yet that includes an ext4 compatible restore. Debian lets you roll your own, but you need to do that before a disaster. It doesn't include useful rescue CDs like FreeBSD does. I've always had great success in the past with RIP Rescue live-cd. It was one of the early live-cds with ext4 support. I wonder if the guy who makes it was smart enough to add restore ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
(inkscape-0.48.1_4) (missing header)
All, Recent csup introduced this error a few week ago - I noticed nothing in UPDATING and several following csup did not resolve. a snippet from the build log: CXXextension/implementation/script.o CXXextension/implementation/xslt.o CXXextension/internal/wpg-input.o extension/internal/wpg-input.cpp:58:44: error: libwpg/WPGStreamImplementation.h: No such file or directory extension/internal/wpg-input.cpp: In member function 'virtual SPDocument* Inkscape::Extension::Internal::WpgInput::open(Inkscape::Extension::Input*, const gchar*)': extension/internal/wpg-input.cpp:73: error: expected type-specifier extension/internal/wpg-input.cpp:73: error: cannot convert 'int*' to 'WPXInputStream*' in initialization extension/internal/wpg-input.cpp:73: error: expected ',' or ';' I wonder if anyone else is seeing this? FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0: Thu Jun 28 12:56:46 EDT 2012 thanks, Nick ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
(gstreamer-plugins-0.10.35_1,3) (compiler error)
All, Recent csup introduced this error ===> Building for gstreamer-plugins-0.10.36,3 . . gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/multimedia/gstreamer-plugins/work/gst-p lugins-base-0.10.36/gst/audioresample' CC libgstaudioresample_la-gstaudioresample.lo CC libgstaudioresample_la-speex_resampler_int.lo CC libgstaudioresample_la-speex_resampler_float.lo In file included from resample.c:134, from speex_resampler_float.c:26: resample_sse.h: In function 'inner_product_single': resample_sse.h:46: error: '__m128' undeclared (first use in this function) resample_sse.h:46: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once resample_sse.h:46: error: for each function it appears in.) resample_sse.h:46: error: expected ';' before 'sum' resample_sse.h:49: error: 'sum' undeclared (first use in this function) resample_sse.h:49: warning: implicit declaration of function '_mm_add_ps' resample_sse.h:49: warning: nested extern declaration of '_mm_add_ps' resample_sse.h:49: warning: implicit declaration of function '_mm_mul_ps' resample_sse.h:49: warning: nested extern declaration of '_mm_mul_ps' resample_sse.h:49: warning: implicit declaration of function '_mm_loadu_ps' the final complaint from portupgrade was ! multimedia/gstreamer-plugins (gstreamer-plugins-0.10.35_1,3) (compiler error) FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0: Thu Jun 28 12:56:46 EDT 2012 thanks, Nick ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
FreeBSD 8-STABLE on R620 w/ X520-DA2/Intel 82599
Hi All, I have 2 hosts, HP DL360 G8 and Dell R620. Both have the X520-DA2/Intel 82599 10G Fiber NIC. Both also have the same FreeBSD 8-STABLE image. The Dell displays the following in dmesg and we are unable to configure the ix0 or ix1 interfaces where the HP works just fine. Wondering if anyone else has experienced this? pci4: at device 0.0 (no driver attached) pci4: at device 0.1 (no driver attached) -- Take care Rick Miller ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: FreeBSD 8-STABLE on R620 w/ X520-DA2/Intel 82599
Please post the output of pciconf -lvc for these devices. -Andrew On Jun 29, 2012, at 10:50 AM, Rick Miller wrote: > Hi All, > > I have 2 hosts, HP DL360 G8 and Dell R620. Both have the > X520-DA2/Intel 82599 10G Fiber NIC. Both also have the same FreeBSD > 8-STABLE image. The Dell displays the following in dmesg and we are > unable to configure the ix0 or ix1 interfaces where the HP works just > fine. Wondering if anyone else has experienced this? > > pci4: at device 0.0 (no driver attached) > pci4: at device 0.1 (no driver attached) > > > -- > Take care > Rick Miller > ___ > freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" -- Andrew Boyerabo...@averesystems.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: (inkscape-0.48.1_4) (missing header)
29.06.2012 18:06, Nikolai Wendorf пишет: Recent csup introduced this error a few week ago - I noticed nothing in UPDATING and several following csup did not resolve. There is something strange with your system. If you have a recent ports tree then you should have inkscape-0.48.2. And then you may be interested at record "20120109: AFFECTS: users of graphics/inkscape". -- WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam) FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Anatomy of Perfomance tests
___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" It would be very interesting to see the results of stress-testing systems. I cannot think of a scenario that isn't possible with a virtual machine. quite but not really. if tested OS does not force hard disk to commit writes at right time, as FreeBSD do, virtual machine will not catch all things. anyway abruptly stopping virtual machine is a good test. use LARGE memory for tested OS. Funny but this is the case when linux is actually worse as it could delay more writes and then issue them in any order. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
"binary diff" utility
i have many windows images running over virtualbox. each takes several gigabytes. i use flat image format. each differs by very little. Is there any program that can do "diff" and keep just a difference between each of them instead copy of whole VM disk?? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: FreeBSD 8-STABLE on R620 w/ X520-DA2/Intel 82599
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:50:52AM -0400, Rick Miller wrote: > Hi All, > > I have 2 hosts, HP DL360 G8 and Dell R620. Both have the > X520-DA2/Intel 82599 10G Fiber NIC. Both also have the same FreeBSD > 8-STABLE image. The Dell displays the following in dmesg and we are > unable to configure the ix0 or ix1 interfaces where the HP works just > fine. Wondering if anyone else has experienced this? > > pci4: at device 0.0 (no driver attached) > pci4: at device 0.1 (no driver attached) Please see http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2012-June/032579.html it may be of some assistance. It looks like adding the Dell specific PCI IDs may be all thats required. Gary ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: "binary diff" utility
Xdelta if I correctly understood what you want. /wbr Ariel Burbaickij On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > i have many windows images running over virtualbox. each takes several > gigabytes. i use flat image format. > > each differs by very little. > > Is there any program that can do "diff" and keep just a difference between > each of them instead copy of whole VM disk?? > ___ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: "binary diff" utility
On Jun 29, 2012, at 8:53 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > i have many windows images running over virtualbox. each takes several > gigabytes. i use flat image format. > > each differs by very little. > > Is there any program that can do "diff" and keep just a difference between > each of them instead copy of whole VM disk?? Try libxdiff… http://www.freshports.org/textproc/libxdiff/ >From the pkg-descr: The LibXDiff library implements basic and yet complete functionalities to create file differences/patches to both binary and text files. The library uses memory files as file abstraction to achieve both performance and portability. For binary files, LibXDiff implements (with some modification) the algorithm described in File System Support for Delta Compression by Joshua P. MacDonald, while for text files it follows directives described in An O(ND) Difference Algorithm and Its Variations by Eugene W. Myers. Memory files used by the library are basically a collection of buffers that store the file content. There are two different requirements for memory files when passed to diff/patch functions. Text files for diff/patch functions require that a single line do not have to spawn across two different memory file blocks. Binary diff/patch functions require memory files to be compact. A compact memory files is a file whose content is stored inside a single block. WWW: http://www.xmailserver.org/xdiff-lib.html -- Devin _ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: "binary diff" utility
On Jun 29, 2012, at 9:01 AM, Ariel Burbaickij wrote: > Xdelta if I correctly understood what you want. > vbindiff might also fit the bill… http://www.freshports.org/textproc/vbindiff/ >From the pkg-descr: Visual Binary Diff (VBinDiff) displays files in hexadecimal and ASCII (or EBCDIC). It can also display two files at once, and highlight the differences between them. Unlike diff, it works well with large files (up to 4 GB). WWW: http://www.pobox.com/~cjm/vbindiff/ -- Devin > /wbr > Ariel Burbaickij > > On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Wojciech Puchar > wrote: >> i have many windows images running over virtualbox. each takes several >> gigabytes. i use flat image format. >> >> each differs by very little. >> >> Is there any program that can do "diff" and keep just a difference between >> each of them instead copy of whole VM disk?? >> ___ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > ___ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" _ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: "binary diff" utility
On Jun 29, 2012, at 8:53 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > i have many windows images running over virtualbox. each takes several > gigabytes. i use flat image format. > > each differs by very little. > > Is there any program that can do "diff" and keep just a difference between > each of them instead copy of whole VM disk?? Der, someone over my shoulder highlights the fact that there's "bsdiff" and "bspatch" in the base system for diffing/patching binary files. But your mileage may vary with such large files. Something from ports that's already been recommended may work better. -- Devin _ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: FreeBSD 8-STABLE on R620 w/ X520-DA2/Intel 82599
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Gary Palmer wrote: > On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:50:52AM -0400, Rick Miller wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I have 2 hosts, HP DL360 G8 and Dell R620. Both have the >> X520-DA2/Intel 82599 10G Fiber NIC. Both also have the same FreeBSD >> 8-STABLE image. The Dell displays the following in dmesg and we are >> unable to configure the ix0 or ix1 interfaces where the HP works just >> fine. Wondering if anyone else has experienced this? >> >> pci4: at device 0.0 (no driver attached) >> pci4: at device 0.1 (no driver attached) > > Please see > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2012-June/032579.html > > it may be of some assistance. It looks like adding the Dell specific > PCI IDs may be all thats required. Hrmm, very interesting indeed. How do I identify if/when/where the source has been updated? -- Take care Rick Miller ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: FreeBSD 8-STABLE on R620 w/ X520-DA2/Intel 82599
Be patient, a new version will hit HEAD soon with the ID added. Jack On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Rick Miller wrote: > On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Gary Palmer wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:50:52AM -0400, Rick Miller wrote: > >> Hi All, > >> > >> I have 2 hosts, HP DL360 G8 and Dell R620. Both have the > >> X520-DA2/Intel 82599 10G Fiber NIC. Both also have the same FreeBSD > >> 8-STABLE image. The Dell displays the following in dmesg and we are > >> unable to configure the ix0 or ix1 interfaces where the HP works just > >> fine. Wondering if anyone else has experienced this? > >> > >> pci4: at device 0.0 (no driver attached) > >> pci4: at device 0.1 (no driver attached) > > > > Please see > > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2012-June/032579.html > > > > it may be of some assistance. It looks like adding the Dell specific > > PCI IDs may be all thats required. > > Hrmm, very interesting indeed. > > How do I identify if/when/where the source has been updated? > > -- > Take care > Rick Miller > ___ > freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: FreeBSD 8-STABLE on R620 w/ X520-DA2/Intel 82599
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Gary Palmer wrote: > On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:50:52AM -0400, Rick Miller wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I have 2 hosts, HP DL360 G8 and Dell R620. Both have the >> X520-DA2/Intel 82599 10G Fiber NIC. Both also have the same FreeBSD >> 8-STABLE image. The Dell displays the following in dmesg and we are >> unable to configure the ix0 or ix1 interfaces where the HP works just >> fine. Wondering if anyone else has experienced this? >> >> pci4: at device 0.0 (no driver attached) >> pci4: at device 0.1 (no driver attached) > > Please see > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2012-June/032579.html > > it may be of some assistance. It looks like adding the Dell specific > PCI IDs may be all thats required. We removed an Intel branded equivalent from the DL360 and tried it in the R620. It detected it no problem. Only problem was we could not see it in the BIOS, not a huge deal to us. -- Rick Miller ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: video buffer location
On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 15:13:27 +0200, Harald Weis wrote: > In contrast to firefox, > there is no decent video download helper for opera. Oh, there _is_, even though it's not integrated in Opera. :-) For YouTube, check out the port "youtube-dl". For most of everything else, see http://github.com/monsieurvideo/get-flash-videos for details. > HOWTO find the video buffer location if it is not /tmp ? I would assume there's some temporary storage either in ~/.opera or ~/.macromedia (for the "Flash" plugin). -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: (inkscape-0.48.1_4) (missing header)
many thanks Boris! failure to read UPDATING also using output of portupgrade summary is bad idea - inkscape-0.48.1_4 is what I was upgrading from I'll quit using that and use the ---> Upgrading 'inkscape-0.48.1_4' to 'inkscape-0.48.2_2' (graphics/inkscape) line instead compiles fine after pkg_delete per 20120109 On 6/29/2012 11:14 AM, Boris Samorodov wrote: 29.06.2012 18:06, Nikolai Wendorf пишет: Recent csup introduced this error a few week ago - I noticed nothing in UPDATING and several following csup did not resolve. There is something strange with your system. If you have a recent ports tree then you should have inkscape-0.48.2. And then you may be interested at record "20120109: AFFECTS: users of graphics/inkscape". ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
FreeBSD 9.0 hang
I have a 9.0 p3 system that is in production for about a week and it just plain hung this morning. The console had the last two messages as: link_eif symbol atm_event undefined KLD if_en.ko: depends on utopia - not available or version mismatch. I haven't found anything relevant on those through Google. if_en.ko os present as is utopia.ko. I don't understand why the kernel would try to load if_en as I don't have any of those devices. There are em0 and dc0 ethernet interfaces. This is almost a generic kernel. The config file contains: include GENERIC ident LAFN nocpu i486_CPU nocpu i586_CPU options QUOTA #device atapicam options ALTQ# Enable ALTQ. options ALTQ_CBQ# Build the ``Class Based Queuing'' discipline. options ALTQ_NOPCC # Required for SMP build I couldn't find any relevant log messages that would indicate why this module was trying to be loaded. However, even so, I would think it should load ok. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
