Re: 9.1 Postfix problem
On Apr 17, 2013, at 10:04 AM, Lowell Gilbert freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org wrote: Paul Kraus p...@kraus-haus.org writes: When building postfix under 91. I am running into an odd problem. I use the INST_BASE option, which seems to cause the problem (it worked fine with 9.0). The 'make' goes fine, but the 'make install' fails when trying to install the startup script to /usr/etc/rc.d instead of /etc/rc.d. It works fine if INST-BASE is disabled. I looked through the Makefile but could not suss out how that difference in configuration was actually causing the problem. Has anyone else run into this problem and what was the fix (or did you just install into /usr/local) ? I use /usr/local, but this seems to be a typo in the last checkin, which changed the internal names of the port options to our brave new naming scheme. If you look in the Makefile clause for installing to base, renaming the option itself went correctly, but both halves of the '.if' now invoke USE_RC_SUBR. That's correct for PREFIX, but for installing into base should be USE_RCORDER instead. Lowell, That was exactly the problem. I knew it was in the installation configuration *somewhere*, but I just could not find it. Thanks. Should I report this as a bug in the postfix port ? -- Paul Kraus Deputy Technical Director, LoneStarCon 3 Sound Coordinator, Schenectady Light Opera Company ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Sendmail 8.14.5/8.14.5 on fbsd-9.1R (EC2)
All I want to do is have the MTA listen on 127.0.0.1 port 1025 and have no sendmail process listen on the server interface. That's being done by assp which proxies messages to 127.0.0.1:1025. Unfortunately, I haven't been able to figure out how to turn off the default. Sockstat shows: root sendmail 1672 4 tcp4 *:25 *:* root sendmail 1672 5 tcp6 *:25 *:* root sendmail 1672 6 tcp4 127.0.0.1:1025*:* root sendmail 1672 7 tcp4 111.222.333.444:587 *:* The relevant mc entries are: DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=IPv4, Family=inet') DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=IPv6, Family=inet6, Modifiers=O') DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=1025, Addr=127.0.0.1, Name=MTA') VIRTUSER_DOMAIN_FILE(`/etc/mail/virtual-domains') FEATURE(`no_default_msa') DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=587, Addr= 111.222.333.444, Name=MSA, M=E') The MSA isn't strictly necessary now but I thought might have a future use. So, what am I missing? How do I turn *:25 off so that when assp goes down (as it frequently does) I'm not running an open relay (all user/domain validation is done in assp). Any pointers in the right direction appreciated. Thanks -- Jim Flowers jflow...@ezo.net ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Clean up /sys/obj?
After compiling the kernel, there are a large number of files in /sys/ obj. Are these still needed after the new kernel has been installed? Is there some sort of 'make clean' option available? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: 9.1 Postfix problem
Paul Kraus p...@kraus-haus.org writes: That was exactly the problem. I knew it was in the installation configuration *somewhere*, but I just could not find it. Thanks. Should I report this as a bug in the postfix port ? No need. Looks like sahil@ has already fixed it. Be well. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Clean up /sys/obj?
Hello Walter, Perhaps 'make cleanworld' will help. Check out comments in /usr/src/Makefile for details. Cheers ... Marek On Fri, 26 Apr 2013 12:23:37 Walter Hurry wrote: After compiling the kernel, there are a large number of files in /sys/ obj. Are these still needed after the new kernel has been installed? Is there some sort of 'make clean' option available? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Clean up /sys/obj?
On Fri, 26 Apr 2013 12:46:13 -0400, mrkvrg wrote: Hello Walter, Perhaps 'make cleanworld' will help. Check out comments in /usr/src/Makefile for details. Cheers ... Marek On Fri, 26 Apr 2013 12:23:37 Walter Hurry wrote: After compiling the kernel, there are a large number of files in /sys/ obj. Are these still needed after the new kernel has been installed? Is there some sort of 'make clean' option available? That's the one. Thanks! ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Why is pkg_glob no longer working for me?
I used to be able to run pkg_glob to see what packages have been updated since a given date. For example, if I do a big 'portupgrade -fr somepackage' and wait overnight, then in the morning find a handful had failed, I often find it helpful to do something like: pkg_glob -r somepackage -x '= 2013-04-24' to see what packages depend on somepackage but weren't updated when I did the portupgrade on the 24th. But now, I find that pkg_glob always returns absolutely nothing if I specify a date. I did a portupgrade -a on Thursday the 25th of April, and when I try to see which ports actually got updated with pkg_glob '=2013-04-24', it prints nothing. This has been happening for a few weeks, at least, and I wonder an update to the portupgrade package busted it. I have tried rebuilding the package db and ports db using pkgdb and portsdb, with no change in behavior. I tried looking at /var/db/pkg to see if the modification times of directories there might help me answer my question, but far more directories have been touched than packages actually updated (there were, as I recall, 20 pending package upgrades when I started the process). Anyone else have this issue? Or am I the only one left still using portupgrade and its associated tools? -- Tom RussoKM5VY SAR502 DM64ux http://www.swcp.com/~russo/ Tijeras, NM QRPL#1592 K2#398 SOC#236http://kevan.org/brain.cgi?DDTNM echo prpv_a'rfg_cnf_har_cvcr | sed -e 's/_/ /g' | tr [a-m][n-z] [n-z][a-m] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Why is pkg_glob no longer working for me?
OK But modulo CH3CH2OH You need to learn the neue pkg system how it differez On 26 April 2013 16:54, Tom Russo ru...@bogodyn.org wrote: I used to be able to run pkg_glob to see what packages have been updated since a given date. For example, if I do a big 'portupgrade -fr somepackage' and wait overnight, then in the morning find a handful had failed, I often find it helpful to do something like: pkg_glob -r somepackage -x '= 2013-04-24' to see what packages depend on somepackage but weren't updated when I did the portupgrade on the 24th. But now, I find that pkg_glob always returns absolutely nothing if I specify a date. I did a portupgrade -a on Thursday the 25th of April, and when I try to see which ports actually got updated with pkg_glob '=2013-04-24', it prints nothing. This has been happening for a few weeks, at least, and I wonder an update to the portupgrade package busted it. I have tried rebuilding the package db and ports db using pkgdb and portsdb, with no change in behavior. I tried looking at /var/db/pkg to see if the modification times of directories there might help me answer my question, but far more directories have been touched than packages actually updated (there were, as I recall, 20 pending package upgrades when I started the process). Anyone else have this issue? Or am I the only one left still using portupgrade and its associated tools? -- Tom RussoKM5VY SAR502 DM64ux http://www.swcp.com/~russo/ Tijeras, NM QRPL#1592 K2#398 SOC#236 http://kevan.org/brain.cgi?DDTNM echo prpv_a'rfg_cnf_har_cvcr | sed -e 's/_/ /g' | tr [a-m][n-z] [n-z][a-m] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- -- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Clean up /sys/obj?
On 26 April 2013 14:02, Walter Hurry walterhu...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, 26 Apr 2013 12:46:13 -0400, mrkvrg wrote: Hello Walter, Perhaps 'make cleanworld' will help. Check out comments in /usr/src/Makefile for details. Cheers ... Marek On Fri, 26 Apr 2013 12:23:37 Walter Hurry wrote: After compiling the kernel, there are a large number of files in /sys/ obj. Are these still needed after the new kernel has been installed? Is there some sort of 'make clean' option available? That's the one. Thanks! ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org No, /usr/sys is not required subsequent to make intallwolrd oder kernelk -- -- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
