question about pkg

2013-09-03 Thread Waitman Gobble 
Hi,

by chance anyone know what's up with this.. could save me some
troubleshooting time..



Here's a 9.2 machine.

# uname -a
FreeBSD do.burplex.com 9.2-BETA2 FreeBSD 9.2-BETA2 #0 r253773M: Mon Jul 29
14:22:34 PDT 2013 da3m0n8...@do.burplex.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KAGISO
 amd64

# sqlite3 /var/db/pkg/local.sqlite

sqlite> SELECT COUNT(id) FROM packages WHERE time is null;
0
sqlite> SELECT COUNT(id) FROM packages WHERE time is not null;
551



Here's a 10.0-CURRENT machine.

> uname -a
FreeBSD dx.burplex.com 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0 r252355: Fri
Jun 28 16:39:19 PDT 2013 r...@dx.burplex.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/FURAHA
 amd64

# sqlite3 /var/db/pkg/local.sqlite

sqlite> SELECT COUNT(id) FROM packages WHERE time is null;
814
sqlite> SELECT COUNT(id) FROM packages WHERE time is NOT null;
104



time = null is causing me some issues..

Thanks

-- 
Waitman Gobble
San Jose California USA
510-830-7975
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Intel graphics card brightness control issue

2013-09-03 Thread Ethan W. House 
What could be causing my brightness control to not work on my Intel
graphics card. The acpi values change but no effect takes place.

ehouse@derpy ~ $ sudo sysctl hw.acpi.video.lcd0.brightness=50
hw.acpi.video.lcd0.brightness: 100 -> 50
ehouse@derpy ~ $ sudo sysctl hw.acpi.video.lcd0.active=1
hw.acpi.video.lcd0.active: 0 -> 0

I also have an issue were upon resume by machine reboots. I believe the two
might be related but I am not sure.

I found a couple of other email chains with similar issues but most of them
have been inactive for more then a year.

---
Ethan House
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Luis Pereira shared an Animoto video with you!

2013-09-03 Thread Luis Pereira 
Trouble viewing this email? View in a browser 

https://email.animoto.com/pub/sf/FormLink?_ri_=X0Gzc2X%3DWQpglLjHJlYQGhJNjXEKEASSc3q9jvBK4o3ffC2laRCVXMtX%3DWQpglLjHJlYQGjLJm6MhC02SFrsIiY5l2YAMelipMzc3&_ei_=EtmRArNO2XWwP3EOZcn0NKFCeknYVfHrh1RaFYcPlvj4gVDpwEM0wm3j6g.Jg%3D%3D
 

“Copy of Join Us Thursday Sept. 5th 9PM Eastern. Click At The End Of The Video 
To Register...” 

Luis Pereira shared a video with you! 

This coming Thursday, September 5th - Vick Strizheus along with some of his top 
students are hosting (possibly) the biggest Hangout this industry has ever 
seen...  And they are rolling out a '$10K Challenge'

Watch your video! 

https://email.animoto.com/pub/cc?_ri_=X0Gzc2X%3DWQpglLjHJlYQGhJNjXEKEASSc3q9jvBK4o3ffC2laRCVXtpKX%3DWBBBW&_ei_=EseyZ-Mtn2U6u_BfWAsNwzI-ZYBCD1BLpnlu0inkvnxxd1jB06pjBggIh1yXImDW25P8xfgtwTSbBr3QsJJkelMEFziIpRwayfitWsBZJsEKUvSehdcMAH0h8VzHSUj0R95N75kBMW9O-ef2zptoGJIwInfgtV_e67dX9pgie0BXiGViksmyFarAq7hE0sxCnZB_SEI3ZjlARCEymPnBMUy708VLA8DzctZF-bkSJGCltTIe7bIDwjx6AcQkkYlUM1NPQCPpj_cZsGRIv1yyUL-K.Jg%3D%3D
 

Watch your video! 
http://animoto.com:80/t/P61hoDhiVdJGpBi084Xw7Q?utm_medium=email&utm_source=share&utm_content=main_link
 

  

You are receiving this message because you were shared a video created using 
Animoto. 

Privacy Policy 

https://email.animoto.com/pub/cc?_ri_=X0Gzc2X%3DWQpglLjHJlYQGhJNjXEKEASSc3q9jvBK4o3ffC2laRCVXtpKX%3DWBBCS&_ei_=EtmRArNO2XWwP3EOZcn0NKG7RfwqUv9-mTIXqWJSmNqgX22QWmEr4s87-esLhO8rUqHW0v9Sdv8iJLFZ9u0Old3hpT1QuOsRo3-4xR_0bbgrufBmKFYspg.Jg%3D%3D
 

Animoto Productions, 440 Lafayette Street, 2nd Floor, New York, NY, 
10003.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Question about a possible missing line/entry for file UPDATING (from http://svnweb.freebsd.org) - 8.4-RELEASE plus branches

2013-09-03 Thread Pablo Carboni 
Hello Damien,

(First at all, thanks for your response).

I do not want to insist too much with this silly thing, but(just in
case)

I've updated my sources today from
svn0.us-west.freebsd.org(base/releng/8.4), - previously to my first
e-mail - and:

(Argentina's current TZ is GMT-3)

-rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel  74967 Sep  3 12:11 /usr/src/UPDATING

The 'grepped' lines, shows me:

8.3-RELEASE
[...]
8.0-RELEASE

(But 8.4 still doesn't appear).

(However, while grepping first lines in /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh shows
me:

# $FreeBSD: releng/8.4/sys/conf/newvers.sh 254632 2013-08-22 00:51:56Z
delphij $

TYPE="FreeBSD"
REVISION="8.4"
BRANCH="RELEASE-p3"

(Same svn id for UPDATING/newvers.sh).

Any clues? (What's your svn $Id for UPDATING? - I mean, the whole line, the
last)

Thanks a lot!

Regards,
Pablo Carboni.

P.S.: The same happens for
svn0.us-east.freebsd.org/base/releng/8.4/UPDATING.


(Maybe I'm afraid for local syncing problems on my fbsd server)

On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 7:13 PM, Damien Fleuriot  wrote:

> From:
> -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel  75631 Aug 27 12:46 /usr/src/UPDATING
>
>
> 20130607:
> 8.4-RELEASE.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 3 September 2013 18:16, Pablo Carboni  wrote:
>
>> Dear Sirs,
>>
>> Just for curious, today I was looking for the date/entry that belongs to
>> FreeBSD 8.4-RELEASE inside UPDATING file, with no luck.
>>
>> Maybe I've made a mistake and I was looking inside a wrong file/url?
>>
>> It doesn't appear, neither
>>
>> http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/release/8.4.0/UPDATING?revision=251259&view=markup
>> (RELEASE
>> branch)
>>
>> nor
>>
>> http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/releng/8.4/UPDATING?view=markup&pathrev=254632
>> (RELENG
>> branch, currently last revision).
>>
>> (This 'little detail' includes sources for 8.4-RELEASE and branch
>> 8.4-RELEASE-p3, which I've downloaded recently).
>>
>> A quick & dirty search I've did on a 8.4-RELEASE-p3 box:
>>
>> grep "8\..*-RELEASE" /usr/src/UPDATING
>>
>> (There is no reference for '8.4')
>>
>> Thanks in advance!
>>
>> Regards,
>> Pablo Carboni
>> ___
>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
>> freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>>
>
>
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Question about a possible missing line/entry for file UPDATING (from http://svnweb.freebsd.org) - 8.4-RELEASE plus branches

2013-09-03 Thread Damien Fleuriot 
From:
-rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel  75631 Aug 27 12:46 /usr/src/UPDATING


20130607:
8.4-RELEASE.






On 3 September 2013 18:16, Pablo Carboni  wrote:

> Dear Sirs,
>
> Just for curious, today I was looking for the date/entry that belongs to
> FreeBSD 8.4-RELEASE inside UPDATING file, with no luck.
>
> Maybe I've made a mistake and I was looking inside a wrong file/url?
>
> It doesn't appear, neither
>
> http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/release/8.4.0/UPDATING?revision=251259&view=markup
> (RELEASE
> branch)
>
> nor
>
> http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/releng/8.4/UPDATING?view=markup&pathrev=254632
> (RELENG
> branch, currently last revision).
>
> (This 'little detail' includes sources for 8.4-RELEASE and branch
> 8.4-RELEASE-p3, which I've downloaded recently).
>
> A quick & dirty search I've did on a 8.4-RELEASE-p3 box:
>
> grep "8\..*-RELEASE" /usr/src/UPDATING
>
> (There is no reference for '8.4')
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> Regards,
> Pablo Carboni
> ___
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
> freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Support

2013-09-03 Thread Eduardo Morras 

Hi Armando

On Tue, 03 Sep 2013 12:01:15 -0500
sopo...@promonitor.com.mx wrote:

> Hello, i have a "Server" whith the screen information like attach  
> Server.jpg, assumed that are to save the record of IP cameras like  
> network folder (see network.jpg), but another IP cameras need a FTP  
> folder and other that folder don't have blank spaces.

This list eliminates attachments except pgp signatures, smime and vcard, your 
jpeg images went to /dev/null

> If possible make this (FTP and other folder network) in the "server"  
> whit freeBSD, the person what config and install the machine isn't  
> more available so any have the information by they work in this  
> plataform or make changes, so i need makes this adds at they exist.

The configuration depends on what ftp server you are running

> Or have phone number in Mexico how can give me this support

Perhaps you may be more comfortable to ask in spanish list? 
free...@es.freebsd.org Don't remember if it needs subscription to post, but I 
can forward your mail there (in spanish and without attachments).

> 
> Tanks for your time.
> 
> Armando Mayorga
> Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
> Tel +52 81 8998-0070


---   ---
Eduardo Morras 
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: f9 snmpd[4517]: stack overflow detected; terminated

2013-09-03 Thread Fernando Apesteguía 
El 03/09/2013 21:47, "alexus"  escribió:
>
> I use bsnmpd w/ mrtg (have been for very long time and everything was ok,
till recently), mrtg just monitors interface(s) as it always did, nothing
special..
>
> any ideas how to solve it though?

I'm really sorry. I don't use SNMP.
I would try to configure snmpd to be as verbose as possible and see if it
can log something interesting before it crashes.

Maybe someone who uses it can step in and help you to debug the problem.

>
>
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Fernando Apesteguía <
fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:22 PM, alexus  wrote:
>>>
>>> #13156 0x in ?? ()
>>> #13157 0x0001 in ?? ()
>>> #13158 0x7fffae80 in ?? ()
>>> #13159 0x00080063c400 in ?? ()
>>> #13160 0x7fffae90 in ?? ()
>>> #13161 0x7fffae30 in ?? ()
>>> #13162 0x00080063c000 in ?? ()
>>> #13163 0x000800624244 in dlclose () from /libexec/ld-elf.so.1
>>> Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)
>>> (gdb)
>>>
>>> http://pastebin.com/qhQGC5A4
>>
>>
>> It was long indeed :)
>>
>> It seems to me you are receiving a very long query from the network and
somehow, the snmp_input_finish() function is blowing up.
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Fernando Apesteguía <
fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com> wrote:


 El 03/09/2013 21:11, "alexus"  escribió:


 >
 > it's _REALLY_ long, but if you want I can upload it somewhere...
 >
 > last couple of lines is following:
 >
 > #13163 0x000800624244 in dlclose () from /libexec/ld-elf.so.1
 > Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)

 Not much there.

 Paste the last 10 or 20 lines please. Let's see if that throws some
light.

 >
 >
 >
 > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Fernando Apesteguía <
fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com> wrote:
 >>
 >>
 >>
 >>
 >> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:04 PM, alexus  wrote:
 >>>
 >>> can you guide me through to get "whole backtrace" please?
 >>
 >>
 >> After opening the core like you did, type "bt" and press enter.
 >>
 >>>
 >>>
 >>>
 >>> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Fernando Apesteguía <
fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com> wrote:
 
 
  El 27/08/2013 05:03, "alexus"  escribió:
 
 
  >
  > f9# gdb `which bsnmpd` /bsnmpd.core
  > GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
  > Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
  > GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public
License, and you are
  > welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under
certain
  > conditions.
  > Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
  > There is absolutely no warranty for GDB.  Type "show warranty"
for details.
  > This GDB was configured as "amd64-marcel-freebsd"...(no
debugging symbols
  > found)...
  > Core was generated by `bsnmpd'.
  > Program terminated with signal 6, Aborted.
  > Reading symbols from /lib/libbegemot.so.4...(no debugging
symbols
  > found)...done.
  > Loaded symbols for /lib/libbegemot.so.4
  > Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libbsnmp.so.6...(no debugging
symbols
  > found)...done.
  > Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libbsnmp.so.6
  > Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libwrap.so.6...(no debugging
symbols
  > found)...done.
  > Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libwrap.so.6
  > Reading symbols from /lib/libc.so.7...(no debugging symbols
found)...done.
  > Loaded symbols for /lib/libc.so.7
  > Reading symbols from /lib/libcrypto.so.6...(no debugging symbols
  > found)...done.
  > Loaded symbols for /lib/libcrypto.so.6
  > Reading symbols from /usr/lib/snmp_mibII.so...(no debugging
symbols
  > found)...done.
  > Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/snmp_mibII.so
  > Reading symbols from /libexec/ld-elf.so.1...(no debugging
symbols
  > found)...done.
  > Loaded symbols for /libexec/ld-elf.so.1
  > #0  0x000800f54d6c in kill () from /lib/libc.so.7
  > (gdb)
 
  Is that the whole backtrace?
 
  >
  >
  >
  > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:42 PM, James Gosnell <
jamesgosn...@gmail.com>wrote:
  >
  > > What's the core dump and your config file look like?
  > >
  > >
  > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:28 PM, alexus 
wrote:
  > >
  > > > My bsnmpd(1) keep crashing(
  > > >
  > > > f9# uname -a
  > > > FreeBSD f9.alexus.org 9.1-RELEASE-p6 FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE-p6
#0: Wed Aug
  > > 21
  > > > 20:40:52 UTC 2013
  > > > r...@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:
/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
  > > >  amd64
  > >

Re: f9 snmpd[4517]: stack overflow detected; terminated

2013-09-03 Thread alexus 
I use bsnmpd w/ mrtg (have been for very long time and everything was ok,
till recently), mrtg just monitors interface(s) as it always did, nothing
special..

any ideas how to solve it though?


On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Fernando Apesteguía <
fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:22 PM, alexus  wrote:
>
>> #13156 0x in ?? ()
>> #13157 0x0001 in ?? ()
>> #13158 0x7fffae80 in ?? ()
>> #13159 0x00080063c400 in ?? ()
>> #13160 0x7fffae90 in ?? ()
>> #13161 0x7fffae30 in ?? ()
>> #13162 0x00080063c000 in ?? ()
>> #13163 0x000800624244 in dlclose () from /libexec/ld-elf.so.1
>> Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)
>> (gdb)
>>
>> http://pastebin.com/qhQGC5A4
>>
>
> It was long indeed :)
>
> It seems to me you are receiving a very long query from the network and
> somehow, the snmp_input_finish() function is blowing up.
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Fernando Apesteguía <
>> fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> El 03/09/2013 21:11, "alexus"  escribió:
>>>
>>> >
>>> > it's _REALLY_ long, but if you want I can upload it somewhere...
>>> >
>>> > last couple of lines is following:
>>> >
>>> > #13163 0x000800624244 in dlclose () from /libexec/ld-elf.so.1
>>> > Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)
>>>
>>> Not much there.
>>>
>>> Paste the last 10 or 20 lines please. Let's see if that throws some
>>> light.
>>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Fernando Apesteguía <
>>> fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:04 PM, alexus  wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> can you guide me through to get "whole backtrace" please?
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> After opening the core like you did, type "bt" and press enter.
>>> >>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Fernando Apesteguía <
>>> fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>  El 27/08/2013 05:03, "alexus"  escribió:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>  >
>>>  > f9# gdb `which bsnmpd` /bsnmpd.core
>>>  > GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
>>>  > Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>>>  > GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License,
>>> and you are
>>>  > welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain
>>>  > conditions.
>>>  > Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
>>>  > There is absolutely no warranty for GDB.  Type "show warranty"
>>> for details.
>>>  > This GDB was configured as "amd64-marcel-freebsd"...(no debugging
>>> symbols
>>>  > found)...
>>>  > Core was generated by `bsnmpd'.
>>>  > Program terminated with signal 6, Aborted.
>>>  > Reading symbols from /lib/libbegemot.so.4...(no debugging symbols
>>>  > found)...done.
>>>  > Loaded symbols for /lib/libbegemot.so.4
>>>  > Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libbsnmp.so.6...(no debugging
>>> symbols
>>>  > found)...done.
>>>  > Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libbsnmp.so.6
>>>  > Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libwrap.so.6...(no debugging symbols
>>>  > found)...done.
>>>  > Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libwrap.so.6
>>>  > Reading symbols from /lib/libc.so.7...(no debugging symbols
>>> found)...done.
>>>  > Loaded symbols for /lib/libc.so.7
>>>  > Reading symbols from /lib/libcrypto.so.6...(no debugging symbols
>>>  > found)...done.
>>>  > Loaded symbols for /lib/libcrypto.so.6
>>>  > Reading symbols from /usr/lib/snmp_mibII.so...(no debugging
>>> symbols
>>>  > found)...done.
>>>  > Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/snmp_mibII.so
>>>  > Reading symbols from /libexec/ld-elf.so.1...(no debugging symbols
>>>  > found)...done.
>>>  > Loaded symbols for /libexec/ld-elf.so.1
>>>  > #0  0x000800f54d6c in kill () from /lib/libc.so.7
>>>  > (gdb)
>>> 
>>>  Is that the whole backtrace?
>>> 
>>>  >
>>>  >
>>>  >
>>>  > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:42 PM, James Gosnell <
>>> jamesgosn...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>  >
>>>  > > What's the core dump and your config file look like?
>>>  > >
>>>  > >
>>>  > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:28 PM, alexus 
>>> wrote:
>>>  > >
>>>  > > > My bsnmpd(1) keep crashing(
>>>  > > >
>>>  > > > f9# uname -a
>>>  > > > FreeBSD f9.alexus.org 9.1-RELEASE-p6 FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE-p6
>>> #0: Wed Aug
>>>  > > 21
>>>  > > > 20:40:52 UTC 2013
>>>  > > > r...@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:
>>> /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
>>>  > > >  amd64
>>>  > > > f9# bzip2 -cd all.log.1.bz2 | grep snmpd
>>>  > > > Aug 24 20:59:55 f9 snmpd[4517]: stack overflow detected;
>>> terminated
>>>  > > > Aug 24 20:59:55 f9 kernel: Aug 24 20:59:55 f9 snmpd[4517]:
>>> stack overflow
>>>  > > > detected; terminated
>>>  > > > Aug 24 20:59:56 f9 kernel: pid 4517 (bsnmpd), uid 0: exited
>>> on signal 6
>>>  > > > (

Re: f9 snmpd[4517]: stack overflow detected; terminated

2013-09-03 Thread Fernando Apesteguía 
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:22 PM, alexus  wrote:

> #13156 0x in ?? ()
> #13157 0x0001 in ?? ()
> #13158 0x7fffae80 in ?? ()
> #13159 0x00080063c400 in ?? ()
> #13160 0x7fffae90 in ?? ()
> #13161 0x7fffae30 in ?? ()
> #13162 0x00080063c000 in ?? ()
> #13163 0x000800624244 in dlclose () from /libexec/ld-elf.so.1
> Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)
> (gdb)
>
> http://pastebin.com/qhQGC5A4
>

It was long indeed :)

It seems to me you are receiving a very long query from the network and
somehow, the snmp_input_finish() function is blowing up.




>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Fernando Apesteguía <
> fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> El 03/09/2013 21:11, "alexus"  escribió:
>>
>> >
>> > it's _REALLY_ long, but if you want I can upload it somewhere...
>> >
>> > last couple of lines is following:
>> >
>> > #13163 0x000800624244 in dlclose () from /libexec/ld-elf.so.1
>> > Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)
>>
>> Not much there.
>>
>> Paste the last 10 or 20 lines please. Let's see if that throws some light.
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Fernando Apesteguía <
>> fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:04 PM, alexus  wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> can you guide me through to get "whole backtrace" please?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> After opening the core like you did, type "bt" and press enter.
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Fernando Apesteguía <
>> fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>  El 27/08/2013 05:03, "alexus"  escribió:
>> 
>> 
>>  >
>>  > f9# gdb `which bsnmpd` /bsnmpd.core
>>  > GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
>>  > Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>>  > GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License,
>> and you are
>>  > welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain
>>  > conditions.
>>  > Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
>>  > There is absolutely no warranty for GDB.  Type "show warranty" for
>> details.
>>  > This GDB was configured as "amd64-marcel-freebsd"...(no debugging
>> symbols
>>  > found)...
>>  > Core was generated by `bsnmpd'.
>>  > Program terminated with signal 6, Aborted.
>>  > Reading symbols from /lib/libbegemot.so.4...(no debugging symbols
>>  > found)...done.
>>  > Loaded symbols for /lib/libbegemot.so.4
>>  > Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libbsnmp.so.6...(no debugging symbols
>>  > found)...done.
>>  > Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libbsnmp.so.6
>>  > Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libwrap.so.6...(no debugging symbols
>>  > found)...done.
>>  > Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libwrap.so.6
>>  > Reading symbols from /lib/libc.so.7...(no debugging symbols
>> found)...done.
>>  > Loaded symbols for /lib/libc.so.7
>>  > Reading symbols from /lib/libcrypto.so.6...(no debugging symbols
>>  > found)...done.
>>  > Loaded symbols for /lib/libcrypto.so.6
>>  > Reading symbols from /usr/lib/snmp_mibII.so...(no debugging symbols
>>  > found)...done.
>>  > Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/snmp_mibII.so
>>  > Reading symbols from /libexec/ld-elf.so.1...(no debugging symbols
>>  > found)...done.
>>  > Loaded symbols for /libexec/ld-elf.so.1
>>  > #0  0x000800f54d6c in kill () from /lib/libc.so.7
>>  > (gdb)
>> 
>>  Is that the whole backtrace?
>> 
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:42 PM, James Gosnell <
>> jamesgosn...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>  >
>>  > > What's the core dump and your config file look like?
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:28 PM, alexus 
>> wrote:
>>  > >
>>  > > > My bsnmpd(1) keep crashing(
>>  > > >
>>  > > > f9# uname -a
>>  > > > FreeBSD f9.alexus.org 9.1-RELEASE-p6 FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE-p6
>> #0: Wed Aug
>>  > > 21
>>  > > > 20:40:52 UTC 2013
>>  > > > r...@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:
>> /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
>>  > > >  amd64
>>  > > > f9# bzip2 -cd all.log.1.bz2 | grep snmpd
>>  > > > Aug 24 20:59:55 f9 snmpd[4517]: stack overflow detected;
>> terminated
>>  > > > Aug 24 20:59:55 f9 kernel: Aug 24 20:59:55 f9 snmpd[4517]:
>> stack overflow
>>  > > > detected; terminated
>>  > > > Aug 24 20:59:56 f9 kernel: pid 4517 (bsnmpd), uid 0: exited on
>> signal 6
>>  > > > (core dumped)
>>  > > > f9# head -1 /etc/snmpd.config
>>  > > > # $FreeBSD: release/9.1.0/etc/snmpd.config 216595 2010-12-20
>> 17:28:15Z
>>  > > > syrinx $
>>  > > > f9#
>>  > > >
>>  > > > What can I do to resolve it?
>>  > > >
>>  > > > --
>>  > > > http://alexus.org/
>>  > > > ___
>>  > > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
>>  > > > http://lists.f

Re: f9 snmpd[4517]: stack overflow detected; terminated

2013-09-03 Thread alexus 
#13156 0x in ?? ()
#13157 0x0001 in ?? ()
#13158 0x7fffae80 in ?? ()
#13159 0x00080063c400 in ?? ()
#13160 0x7fffae90 in ?? ()
#13161 0x7fffae30 in ?? ()
#13162 0x00080063c000 in ?? ()
#13163 0x000800624244 in dlclose () from /libexec/ld-elf.so.1
Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)
(gdb)

http://pastebin.com/qhQGC5A4



On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Fernando Apesteguía <
fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> El 03/09/2013 21:11, "alexus"  escribió:
>
> >
> > it's _REALLY_ long, but if you want I can upload it somewhere...
> >
> > last couple of lines is following:
> >
> > #13163 0x000800624244 in dlclose () from /libexec/ld-elf.so.1
> > Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)
>
> Not much there.
>
> Paste the last 10 or 20 lines please. Let's see if that throws some light.
>
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Fernando Apesteguía <
> fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:04 PM, alexus  wrote:
> >>>
> >>> can you guide me through to get "whole backtrace" please?
> >>
> >>
> >> After opening the core like you did, type "bt" and press enter.
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Fernando Apesteguía <
> fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>  El 27/08/2013 05:03, "alexus"  escribió:
> 
> 
>  >
>  > f9# gdb `which bsnmpd` /bsnmpd.core
>  > GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
>  > Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>  > GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License,
> and you are
>  > welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain
>  > conditions.
>  > Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
>  > There is absolutely no warranty for GDB.  Type "show warranty" for
> details.
>  > This GDB was configured as "amd64-marcel-freebsd"...(no debugging
> symbols
>  > found)...
>  > Core was generated by `bsnmpd'.
>  > Program terminated with signal 6, Aborted.
>  > Reading symbols from /lib/libbegemot.so.4...(no debugging symbols
>  > found)...done.
>  > Loaded symbols for /lib/libbegemot.so.4
>  > Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libbsnmp.so.6...(no debugging symbols
>  > found)...done.
>  > Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libbsnmp.so.6
>  > Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libwrap.so.6...(no debugging symbols
>  > found)...done.
>  > Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libwrap.so.6
>  > Reading symbols from /lib/libc.so.7...(no debugging symbols
> found)...done.
>  > Loaded symbols for /lib/libc.so.7
>  > Reading symbols from /lib/libcrypto.so.6...(no debugging symbols
>  > found)...done.
>  > Loaded symbols for /lib/libcrypto.so.6
>  > Reading symbols from /usr/lib/snmp_mibII.so...(no debugging symbols
>  > found)...done.
>  > Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/snmp_mibII.so
>  > Reading symbols from /libexec/ld-elf.so.1...(no debugging symbols
>  > found)...done.
>  > Loaded symbols for /libexec/ld-elf.so.1
>  > #0  0x000800f54d6c in kill () from /lib/libc.so.7
>  > (gdb)
> 
>  Is that the whole backtrace?
> 
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:42 PM, James Gosnell <
> jamesgosn...@gmail.com>wrote:
>  >
>  > > What's the core dump and your config file look like?
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:28 PM, alexus  wrote:
>  > >
>  > > > My bsnmpd(1) keep crashing(
>  > > >
>  > > > f9# uname -a
>  > > > FreeBSD f9.alexus.org 9.1-RELEASE-p6 FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE-p6
> #0: Wed Aug
>  > > 21
>  > > > 20:40:52 UTC 2013
>  > > > r...@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
>  > > >  amd64
>  > > > f9# bzip2 -cd all.log.1.bz2 | grep snmpd
>  > > > Aug 24 20:59:55 f9 snmpd[4517]: stack overflow detected;
> terminated
>  > > > Aug 24 20:59:55 f9 kernel: Aug 24 20:59:55 f9 snmpd[4517]:
> stack overflow
>  > > > detected; terminated
>  > > > Aug 24 20:59:56 f9 kernel: pid 4517 (bsnmpd), uid 0: exited on
> signal 6
>  > > > (core dumped)
>  > > > f9# head -1 /etc/snmpd.config
>  > > > # $FreeBSD: release/9.1.0/etc/snmpd.config 216595 2010-12-20
> 17:28:15Z
>  > > > syrinx $
>  > > > f9#
>  > > >
>  > > > What can I do to resolve it?
>  > > >
>  > > > --
>  > > > http://alexus.org/
>  > > > ___
>  > > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
>  > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
>  > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
>  > > > freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>  > > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > --
>  > > James Gosnell, ACP
>  > > ___
>  > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
>  > > http:/

/compat/linux/usr/bin/ldd always reports "not a dynamic executable"

2013-09-03 Thread Kostas Oikonomou 
I am on FreeBSD 9.1, and I'm trying to use /compat/linux/usr/bin/ldd to 
tell me what libraries are needed by libpython2.7.so, a library obtained 
from a linux system.  But all I get is "not a dynamic executable".


In fact, the same thing happens if I run this ldd on a library in 
/compat/linux/lib:


[ko@wiley /compat/linux/lib]$ /compat/linux/usr/bin/ldd -v libc-2.9.so
not a dynamic executable
[ko@wiley /compat/linux/lib]$

What is going on?Thanks for any help.

Kostas
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: f9 snmpd[4517]: stack overflow detected; terminated

2013-09-03 Thread Fernando Apesteguía 
El 03/09/2013 21:11, "alexus"  escribió:
>
> it's _REALLY_ long, but if you want I can upload it somewhere...
>
> last couple of lines is following:
>
> #13163 0x000800624244 in dlclose () from /libexec/ld-elf.so.1
> Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)

Not much there.

Paste the last 10 or 20 lines please. Let's see if that throws some light.

>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Fernando Apesteguía <
fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:04 PM, alexus  wrote:
>>>
>>> can you guide me through to get "whole backtrace" please?
>>
>>
>> After opening the core like you did, type "bt" and press enter.
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Fernando Apesteguía <
fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com> wrote:


 El 27/08/2013 05:03, "alexus"  escribió:


 >
 > f9# gdb `which bsnmpd` /bsnmpd.core
 > GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
 > Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
 > GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and
you are
 > welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain
 > conditions.
 > Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
 > There is absolutely no warranty for GDB.  Type "show warranty" for
details.
 > This GDB was configured as "amd64-marcel-freebsd"...(no debugging
symbols
 > found)...
 > Core was generated by `bsnmpd'.
 > Program terminated with signal 6, Aborted.
 > Reading symbols from /lib/libbegemot.so.4...(no debugging symbols
 > found)...done.
 > Loaded symbols for /lib/libbegemot.so.4
 > Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libbsnmp.so.6...(no debugging symbols
 > found)...done.
 > Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libbsnmp.so.6
 > Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libwrap.so.6...(no debugging symbols
 > found)...done.
 > Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libwrap.so.6
 > Reading symbols from /lib/libc.so.7...(no debugging symbols
found)...done.
 > Loaded symbols for /lib/libc.so.7
 > Reading symbols from /lib/libcrypto.so.6...(no debugging symbols
 > found)...done.
 > Loaded symbols for /lib/libcrypto.so.6
 > Reading symbols from /usr/lib/snmp_mibII.so...(no debugging symbols
 > found)...done.
 > Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/snmp_mibII.so
 > Reading symbols from /libexec/ld-elf.so.1...(no debugging symbols
 > found)...done.
 > Loaded symbols for /libexec/ld-elf.so.1
 > #0  0x000800f54d6c in kill () from /lib/libc.so.7
 > (gdb)

 Is that the whole backtrace?

 >
 >
 >
 > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:42 PM, James Gosnell <
jamesgosn...@gmail.com>wrote:
 >
 > > What's the core dump and your config file look like?
 > >
 > >
 > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:28 PM, alexus  wrote:
 > >
 > > > My bsnmpd(1) keep crashing(
 > > >
 > > > f9# uname -a
 > > > FreeBSD f9.alexus.org 9.1-RELEASE-p6 FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE-p6 #0:
Wed Aug
 > > 21
 > > > 20:40:52 UTC 2013
 > > > r...@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
 > > >  amd64
 > > > f9# bzip2 -cd all.log.1.bz2 | grep snmpd
 > > > Aug 24 20:59:55 f9 snmpd[4517]: stack overflow detected;
terminated
 > > > Aug 24 20:59:55 f9 kernel: Aug 24 20:59:55 f9 snmpd[4517]: stack
overflow
 > > > detected; terminated
 > > > Aug 24 20:59:56 f9 kernel: pid 4517 (bsnmpd), uid 0: exited on
signal 6
 > > > (core dumped)
 > > > f9# head -1 /etc/snmpd.config
 > > > # $FreeBSD: release/9.1.0/etc/snmpd.config 216595 2010-12-20
17:28:15Z
 > > > syrinx $
 > > > f9#
 > > >
 > > > What can I do to resolve it?
 > > >
 > > > --
 > > > http://alexus.org/
 > > > ___
 > > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
 > > > freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
 > > >
 > >
 > >
 > >
 > > --
 > > James Gosnell, ACP
 > > ___
 > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
 > > freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
 > >
 >
 >
 >
 > --
 > http://alexus.org/
 > ___
 > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> http://alexus.org/
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> http://alexus.org/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsu

Re: f9 snmpd[4517]: stack overflow detected; terminated

2013-09-03 Thread alexus 
it's _REALLY_ long, but if you want I can upload it somewhere...

last couple of lines is following:

#13163 0x000800624244 in dlclose () from /libexec/ld-elf.so.1
Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)



On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Fernando Apesteguía <
fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:04 PM, alexus  wrote:
>
>> can you guide me through to get "whole backtrace" please?
>>
>
> After opening the core like you did, type "bt" and press enter.
>
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Fernando Apesteguía <
>> fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> El 27/08/2013 05:03, "alexus"  escribió:
>>>
>>> >
>>> > f9# gdb `which bsnmpd` /bsnmpd.core
>>> > GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
>>> > Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>>> > GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and
>>> you are
>>> > welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain
>>> > conditions.
>>> > Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
>>> > There is absolutely no warranty for GDB.  Type "show warranty" for
>>> details.
>>> > This GDB was configured as "amd64-marcel-freebsd"...(no debugging
>>> symbols
>>> > found)...
>>> > Core was generated by `bsnmpd'.
>>> > Program terminated with signal 6, Aborted.
>>> > Reading symbols from /lib/libbegemot.so.4...(no debugging symbols
>>> > found)...done.
>>> > Loaded symbols for /lib/libbegemot.so.4
>>> > Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libbsnmp.so.6...(no debugging symbols
>>> > found)...done.
>>> > Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libbsnmp.so.6
>>> > Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libwrap.so.6...(no debugging symbols
>>> > found)...done.
>>> > Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libwrap.so.6
>>> > Reading symbols from /lib/libc.so.7...(no debugging symbols
>>> found)...done.
>>> > Loaded symbols for /lib/libc.so.7
>>> > Reading symbols from /lib/libcrypto.so.6...(no debugging symbols
>>> > found)...done.
>>> > Loaded symbols for /lib/libcrypto.so.6
>>> > Reading symbols from /usr/lib/snmp_mibII.so...(no debugging symbols
>>> > found)...done.
>>> > Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/snmp_mibII.so
>>> > Reading symbols from /libexec/ld-elf.so.1...(no debugging symbols
>>> > found)...done.
>>> > Loaded symbols for /libexec/ld-elf.so.1
>>> > #0  0x000800f54d6c in kill () from /lib/libc.so.7
>>> > (gdb)
>>>
>>> Is that the whole backtrace?
>>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:42 PM, James Gosnell <
>>> jamesgosn...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > What's the core dump and your config file look like?
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:28 PM, alexus  wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > > My bsnmpd(1) keep crashing(
>>> > > >
>>> > > > f9# uname -a
>>> > > > FreeBSD f9.alexus.org 9.1-RELEASE-p6 FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE-p6 #0:
>>> Wed Aug
>>> > > 21
>>> > > > 20:40:52 UTC 2013
>>> > > > r...@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
>>> > > >  amd64
>>> > > > f9# bzip2 -cd all.log.1.bz2 | grep snmpd
>>> > > > Aug 24 20:59:55 f9 snmpd[4517]: stack overflow detected; terminated
>>> > > > Aug 24 20:59:55 f9 kernel: Aug 24 20:59:55 f9 snmpd[4517]: stack
>>> overflow
>>> > > > detected; terminated
>>> > > > Aug 24 20:59:56 f9 kernel: pid 4517 (bsnmpd), uid 0: exited on
>>> signal 6
>>> > > > (core dumped)
>>> > > > f9# head -1 /etc/snmpd.config
>>> > > > # $FreeBSD: release/9.1.0/etc/snmpd.config 216595 2010-12-20
>>> 17:28:15Z
>>> > > > syrinx $
>>> > > > f9#
>>> > > >
>>> > > > What can I do to resolve it?
>>> > > >
>>> > > > --
>>> > > > http://alexus.org/
>>> > > > ___
>>> > > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
>>> > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
>>> > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
>>> > > > freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > --
>>> > > James Gosnell, ACP
>>> > > ___
>>> > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
>>> > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
>>> > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
>>> > > freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > http://alexus.org/
>>> > ___
>>> > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
>>> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
>>> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
>>> freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://alexus.org/
>>
>
>


-- 
http://alexus.org/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: f9 snmpd[4517]: stack overflow detected; terminated

2013-09-03 Thread Fernando Apesteguía 
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:04 PM, alexus  wrote:

> can you guide me through to get "whole backtrace" please?
>

After opening the core like you did, type "bt" and press enter.


>
>
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Fernando Apesteguía <
> fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> El 27/08/2013 05:03, "alexus"  escribió:
>>
>> >
>> > f9# gdb `which bsnmpd` /bsnmpd.core
>> > GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
>> > Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>> > GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and
>> you are
>> > welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain
>> > conditions.
>> > Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
>> > There is absolutely no warranty for GDB.  Type "show warranty" for
>> details.
>> > This GDB was configured as "amd64-marcel-freebsd"...(no debugging
>> symbols
>> > found)...
>> > Core was generated by `bsnmpd'.
>> > Program terminated with signal 6, Aborted.
>> > Reading symbols from /lib/libbegemot.so.4...(no debugging symbols
>> > found)...done.
>> > Loaded symbols for /lib/libbegemot.so.4
>> > Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libbsnmp.so.6...(no debugging symbols
>> > found)...done.
>> > Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libbsnmp.so.6
>> > Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libwrap.so.6...(no debugging symbols
>> > found)...done.
>> > Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libwrap.so.6
>> > Reading symbols from /lib/libc.so.7...(no debugging symbols
>> found)...done.
>> > Loaded symbols for /lib/libc.so.7
>> > Reading symbols from /lib/libcrypto.so.6...(no debugging symbols
>> > found)...done.
>> > Loaded symbols for /lib/libcrypto.so.6
>> > Reading symbols from /usr/lib/snmp_mibII.so...(no debugging symbols
>> > found)...done.
>> > Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/snmp_mibII.so
>> > Reading symbols from /libexec/ld-elf.so.1...(no debugging symbols
>> > found)...done.
>> > Loaded symbols for /libexec/ld-elf.so.1
>> > #0  0x000800f54d6c in kill () from /lib/libc.so.7
>> > (gdb)
>>
>> Is that the whole backtrace?
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:42 PM, James Gosnell > >wrote:
>> >
>> > > What's the core dump and your config file look like?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:28 PM, alexus  wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > My bsnmpd(1) keep crashing(
>> > > >
>> > > > f9# uname -a
>> > > > FreeBSD f9.alexus.org 9.1-RELEASE-p6 FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE-p6 #0:
>> Wed Aug
>> > > 21
>> > > > 20:40:52 UTC 2013
>> > > > r...@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
>> > > >  amd64
>> > > > f9# bzip2 -cd all.log.1.bz2 | grep snmpd
>> > > > Aug 24 20:59:55 f9 snmpd[4517]: stack overflow detected; terminated
>> > > > Aug 24 20:59:55 f9 kernel: Aug 24 20:59:55 f9 snmpd[4517]: stack
>> overflow
>> > > > detected; terminated
>> > > > Aug 24 20:59:56 f9 kernel: pid 4517 (bsnmpd), uid 0: exited on
>> signal 6
>> > > > (core dumped)
>> > > > f9# head -1 /etc/snmpd.config
>> > > > # $FreeBSD: release/9.1.0/etc/snmpd.config 216595 2010-12-20
>> 17:28:15Z
>> > > > syrinx $
>> > > > f9#
>> > > >
>> > > > What can I do to resolve it?
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > http://alexus.org/
>> > > > ___
>> > > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
>> > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
>> > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
>> > > > freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > James Gosnell, ACP
>> > > ___
>> > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
>> > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
>> > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
>> > > freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > http://alexus.org/
>> > ___
>> > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
>> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
>> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
>> freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>>
>
>
>
> --
> http://alexus.org/
>
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: f9 snmpd[4517]: stack overflow detected; terminated

2013-09-03 Thread alexus 
can you guide me through to get "whole backtrace" please?


On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Fernando Apesteguía <
fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> El 27/08/2013 05:03, "alexus"  escribió:
>
> >
> > f9# gdb `which bsnmpd` /bsnmpd.core
> > GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
> > Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> > GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you
> are
> > welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain
> > conditions.
> > Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
> > There is absolutely no warranty for GDB.  Type "show warranty" for
> details.
> > This GDB was configured as "amd64-marcel-freebsd"...(no debugging symbols
> > found)...
> > Core was generated by `bsnmpd'.
> > Program terminated with signal 6, Aborted.
> > Reading symbols from /lib/libbegemot.so.4...(no debugging symbols
> > found)...done.
> > Loaded symbols for /lib/libbegemot.so.4
> > Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libbsnmp.so.6...(no debugging symbols
> > found)...done.
> > Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libbsnmp.so.6
> > Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libwrap.so.6...(no debugging symbols
> > found)...done.
> > Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libwrap.so.6
> > Reading symbols from /lib/libc.so.7...(no debugging symbols
> found)...done.
> > Loaded symbols for /lib/libc.so.7
> > Reading symbols from /lib/libcrypto.so.6...(no debugging symbols
> > found)...done.
> > Loaded symbols for /lib/libcrypto.so.6
> > Reading symbols from /usr/lib/snmp_mibII.so...(no debugging symbols
> > found)...done.
> > Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/snmp_mibII.so
> > Reading symbols from /libexec/ld-elf.so.1...(no debugging symbols
> > found)...done.
> > Loaded symbols for /libexec/ld-elf.so.1
> > #0  0x000800f54d6c in kill () from /lib/libc.so.7
> > (gdb)
>
> Is that the whole backtrace?
>
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:42 PM, James Gosnell  >wrote:
> >
> > > What's the core dump and your config file look like?
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:28 PM, alexus  wrote:
> > >
> > > > My bsnmpd(1) keep crashing(
> > > >
> > > > f9# uname -a
> > > > FreeBSD f9.alexus.org 9.1-RELEASE-p6 FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE-p6 #0: Wed
> Aug
> > > 21
> > > > 20:40:52 UTC 2013
> > > > r...@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
> > > >  amd64
> > > > f9# bzip2 -cd all.log.1.bz2 | grep snmpd
> > > > Aug 24 20:59:55 f9 snmpd[4517]: stack overflow detected; terminated
> > > > Aug 24 20:59:55 f9 kernel: Aug 24 20:59:55 f9 snmpd[4517]: stack
> overflow
> > > > detected; terminated
> > > > Aug 24 20:59:56 f9 kernel: pid 4517 (bsnmpd), uid 0: exited on
> signal 6
> > > > (core dumped)
> > > > f9# head -1 /etc/snmpd.config
> > > > # $FreeBSD: release/9.1.0/etc/snmpd.config 216595 2010-12-20
> 17:28:15Z
> > > > syrinx $
> > > > f9#
> > > >
> > > > What can I do to resolve it?
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > http://alexus.org/
> > > > ___
> > > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
> > > > freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > James Gosnell, ACP
> > > ___
> > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
> > > freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > http://alexus.org/
> > ___
> > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
> freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>



-- 
http://alexus.org/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Support

2013-09-03 Thread soporte 
Hello, i have a "Server" whith the screen information like attach  
Server.jpg, assumed that are to save the record of IP cameras like  
network folder (see network.jpg), but another IP cameras need a FTP  
folder and other that folder don't have blank spaces.


If possible make this (FTP and other folder network) in the "server"  
whit freeBSD, the person what config and install the machine isn't  
more available so any have the information by they work in this  
plataform or make changes, so i need makes this adds at they exist.


Or have phone number in Mexico how can give me this support

Tanks for your time.

Armando Mayorga
Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
Tel +52 81 8998-0070
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Question about a possible missing line/entry for file UPDATING (from http://svnweb.freebsd.org) - 8.4-RELEASE plus branches

2013-09-03 Thread Pablo Carboni 
Dear Sirs,

Just for curious, today I was looking for the date/entry that belongs to
FreeBSD 8.4-RELEASE inside UPDATING file, with no luck.

Maybe I've made a mistake and I was looking inside a wrong file/url?

It doesn't appear, neither
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/release/8.4.0/UPDATING?revision=251259&view=markup
(RELEASE
branch)

nor
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/releng/8.4/UPDATING?view=markup&pathrev=254632
(RELENG
branch, currently last revision).

(This 'little detail' includes sources for 8.4-RELEASE and branch
8.4-RELEASE-p3, which I've downloaded recently).

A quick & dirty search I've did on a 8.4-RELEASE-p3 box:

grep "8\..*-RELEASE" /usr/src/UPDATING

(There is no reference for '8.4')

Thanks in advance!

Regards,
Pablo Carboni
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Potential Vulnerabilities list on US Cert

2013-09-03 Thread Ian Smith 
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 483, Issue 2, Message: 1
On Mon, 2 Sep 2013 10:41:44 -0400 Jerry  wrote:

 > I usually check the US Cert listing every week to see if anything
 > interesting is listed. 
 > 
 > I discovered that there are two listings for FreeBSD:
 > 
 > 1) http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2013-3077
 > 
 > 2) http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2013-5209
 > 
 > I just thought that users should be aware of this.

Thanks for the thought, Jerry.  To add to Lowell's assurance ..

If you followed the links in those vuln reports to the FreeBSD Security 
Advisories and source patches for all supported FreeBSD versions, that 
were applied prior to their announcement on 22nd August in (at least) 
the freebsd-security@ and freebsd-announce@ lists, you could have known 
a week sooner :)

Anyone running a FreeBSD system with possibly untrusted local users 
running multicast (in the case of CVE-2013-3077) or running servers 
using SCTP (in the case of CVE-2013-5209) would naturally have read 
these and have applied updates before the CERT advisories appeared.

cheers, Ian
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Automatic Network Configuration (DHCP)

2013-09-03 Thread Warren Block 

On Mon, 2 Sep 2013, JC wrote:


Under Section: 29.6.7.2. DHCP Server Installation


There is a error where the file name reads "/usr/local/etc/dhcpd.conf.sample".

"dhcpd.conf.sample" should read "dhcpd.conf.example".


Fixed!  In the future, reporting this type of problem with a PR is the 
best way to make sure people are aware of it.


Thanks!
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Watch the LIVE webcast of MMA Mobile forum and Awards on 4th and 5th September, 2013; 9:30 AM (IST) onwards

2013-09-03 Thread Bhumika 





 This mail is an invitation to watch the LIVE webcast only.
Are you facing today's business issues like growth acceleration, privacy, 
building effective marketing strategies, measurement, mCommerce, research, or 
all of above, expect to be immersed in dialogue, solutions and plotting the 
future???
Then roll up your sleeves, come together and work to figure out in MMA's Mobile 
Marketing forum and Awards 2013.
Watch the LIVE webcast of this event on 4th and 5th September, 2013, starting 
from 9:30 AM (IST) onwards.
URL to watch this LIVE webcast: 
https://www.24framesdigital.com/exchange4media/webcast/mfi2013/
URL to watch the LIVE webcast on mobile: 
https://www.24framesdigital.com/exchange4media/webcast/mfi2013/mobile/
 
[System requirements: Laptop/desktop with good internet connection (at least 
512 kbps and above bandwidth), latest Flash Player, firewall (if any) to allow 
streaming media content to watch the LIVE webcast on desktop/laptop. 

 
System requirement to watch the LIVE webcast on mobile devices: Multimedia 
mobile phone with active GPRS/wifi/3F connection with atleast 512 kbps with 
dedicated bandwidth (phone should have capability to playing streaming media 
content), firewall/proxy should allow streaming video on network (if viewing 
using office internet)]


Hope you get a chance to watch this LIVE webcast. Please contact us in case you 
face any difficulty in viewing. 


Warm Regards, 
Bhumika Gangar,
+91-9320377709
 24 Frames Digital 
Tel: +91-22-23719111, 23090630 | Web: www.24framesdigital.com Address: 511-C, 
Shatrunjay Darshan Building, Motisha Cross Lane, Byculla East, Mumbai, 
Maharashtra, India - 400027.
Offices: Mumbai: +91-9987026862 | Delhi: +91-9810808642 | Bengaluru: 
+91-9742758884



___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Zfs encryption property for freebsd 8.3

2013-09-03 Thread Ivan Voras 
On 03/09/2013 14:14, Emre Çamalan wrote:
> Hi, 
> I want to encrypt some disk on my server with Zfs encryption property but it 
> is not available.
> 
> Are there anybody have got an experience about this?

It can't happen because Oracle has stopped open sourcing ZFS.
http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=30036




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Zfs encryption property for freebsd 8.3

2013-09-03 Thread Emre Çamalan 
Hi, 
I want to encrypt some disk on my server with Zfs encryption property but it is 
not available.

Are there anybody have got an experience about this?


[url]http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E23824_01/html/821-1448/gkkih.html#scrolltoc[/url]
[url]http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/articles/servers-storage-admin/manage-zfs-encryption-1715034.html[/url]

These are good explanations but I got an error and output shows all property;


[root@HP ~]# zpool status
  pool: output
 state: ONLINE
  scan: none requested
config:

NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM
output  ONLINE   0 0 0
  ad0s1eONLINE   0 0 0

errors: No known data errors
[root@HP ~]# zfs create -o encryption=on output/home
cannot create 'output/home': invalid property 'encryption'
[root@HP ~]# zfs get encryption
bad property list: invalid property 'encryption'
usage:
get [-rHp] [-d max] [-o "all" | field[,...]] [-t type[,...]] [-s 
source[,...]]
<"all" | property[,...]> [filesystem|volume|snapshot] ...

The following properties are supported:

PROPERTY   EDIT  INHERIT   VALUES

availableNO   NO   
clones   NO   NO   [,...]
compressratioNO   NO   <1.00x or higher if compressed>
creation NO   NO   
defer_destroyNO   NO   yes | no
mounted  NO   NO   yes | no
origin   NO   NO   
refcompressratio  NO   NO   <1.00x or higher if compressed>
referenced   NO   NO   
type NO   NO   filesystem | volume | snapshot
used NO   NO   
usedbychildren   NO   NO   
usedbydatasetNO   NO   
usedbyrefreservation  NO   NO   
usedbysnapshots  NO   NO   
userrefs NO   NO   
written  NO   NO   
aclinherit  YES  YES   discard | noallow | restricted | 
passthrough | passthrough-x
aclmode YES  YES   discard | groupmask | passthrough | 
restricted
atime   YES  YES   on | off
canmountYES   NO   on | off | noauto
casesensitivity  NO  YES   sensitive | insensitive | mixed
checksumYES  YES   on | off | fletcher2 | fletcher4 | sha256
compression YES  YES   on | off | lzjb | gzip | gzip-[1-9] | zle
copies  YES  YES   1 | 2 | 3
dedup   YES  YES   on | off | verify | sha256[,verify]
devices YES  YES   on | off
execYES  YES   on | off
jailed  YES  YES   on | off
logbias YES  YES   latency | throughput
mlslabelYES  YES   
mountpoint  YES  YES| legacy | none
nbmand  YES  YES   on | off
normalizationNO  YES   none | formC | formD | formKC | formKD
primarycacheYES  YES   all | none | metadata
quota   YES   NO| none
readonlyYES  YES   on | off
recordsize  YES  YES   512 to 128k, power of 2
refquotaYES   NO| none
refreservation  YES   NO| none
reservation YES   NO| none
secondarycache  YES  YES   all | none | metadata
setuid  YES  YES   on | off
sharenfsYES  YES   on | off | share(1M) options
sharesmbYES  YES   on | off | sharemgr(1M) options
snapdir YES  YES   hidden | visible
syncYES  YES   standard | always | disabled
utf8only NO  YES   on | off
version YES   NO   1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | current
volblocksize NO  YES   512 to 128k, power of 2
volsize YES   NO   
vscan   YES  YES   on | off
xattr   YES  YES   on | off
userused@... NO   NO   
groupused@...NO   NO   
userquota@...   YES   NO| none
groupquota@...  YES   NO| none
written@   NO   NO   

Sizes are specified in bytes with standard units such as K, M, G, etc.

User-defined properties can be specified by using a name containing a colon (:).

The {user|group}{used|quota}@ properties must be appended with
a user or group specifier of one of these forms:
POSIX name  (eg: "matt")
POSIX id(eg: "126829")
SMB name@domain (eg: "matt@sun")
SMB SID (eg: "S-1-234-567-89")
[root@HP ~]# 
-

How can I use or add encryption property to FreeBsd 8.3?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscri