Stunnel starting up twice?!?

2007-08-17 Thread Alan Garfield
Hey all,

I've got a weird problem that's just appeared. I'd updated my ports to
the latest CURRENT using portmanager, and now it seems
like /usr/local/etc/rc.d/stunnel.sh is getting run twice!

I have nuked my /etc/rc.d and run mergemaster -i. I'm running
6.2-RELEASE-p7, and the port is the latest available (stunnel-4.20).

Anyone else seem similar?

There is also a small bug in this port in that it fails to find the
chroot'd pid file by default.

Many thanks,
Alan.


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Submitting a new port via send-pr seems broken...

2007-05-24 Thread Alan Garfield
Hey all,

When I try and submit a new port via send-pr I get this from my primary
mail server from the MX at freebsd.org.

---
May 25 14:35:28 thing1 postfix/smtp[65727]: 335055E10:
to=[EMAIL PROTECTED],
relay=mx1.freebsd.org[69.147.83.52]:25, delay=1.1,
delays=0.02/0/0.66/0.38, dsn=4.7.1, status=deferred (host
mx1.freebsd.org[69.147.83.52] said: 450 4.7.1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Recipient address rejected: Service
is unavailable (in reply to RCPT TO command))
---

Am I doing it right? Or is something broken?

Is [EMAIL PROTECTED] the correct address of a port
submission?

Thanks,
Alan.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: cvsup*.au.freebsd.org ??

2006-10-31 Thread Alan Garfield
On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 15:24 -0800, Pete Slagle wrote:

 Edit fastest_cvsup. It's just a Perl script -- it's simple to change it
 to check whatever list of servers you want.

Yeah but then I have to remember to fix it each time whenever it gets
updated (which is currently what I've been doing). It would be good if
the servers included in the mirror list held the whole tree rather than
just chunks. Or have fastest_cvsup check to see if the tree is complete
before suggesting it.

Cheers,
Alan.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: cvsup*.au.freebsd.org ??

2006-10-30 Thread Alan Garfield
On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 10:42 +1100, Norberto Meijome wrote:
 Hi all,
 i'm trying to cvsup /usr/src from cvsup.au.freebsd.org, cvsup2.freebsd.org and
 even 3. they are all rejecting my connections... 
 
 Is it that I stink ;) or something else is going on? 


I also find that the cvsup6.au.freebsd.org is totally useless. It
doesn't carry src-all and this effectively makes fastest_cvsup useless
for me because when I do 'make update' in /usr/src it selects cvs6 and
fails.



[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ cat /etc/make.conf 
CPUTYPE?=pentium4
CFLAGS= -O -pipe

NO_PORTSUPDATE=true
SUP_UPDATE=true
SUPFILE=/usr/share/examples/cvsup/standard-supfile
SUP=/usr/local/bin/csup
SUPFLAGS=-L 2
SUPHOST=`/usr/local/bin/fastest_cvsup -q -c au`

BOOTWAIT=1000

.if ${.CURDIR:M*/usr/ports*}
.include /etc/make-ports.conf
.endif



It's highly annoying!

Alan.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: cvsup*.au.freebsd.org ??

2006-10-30 Thread Alan Garfield
On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 11:30 +1100, Norberto Meijome wrote:
 On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 11:21:32 +1100
 Alan Garfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  SUPHOST=`/usr/local/bin/fastest_cvsup -q -c au`
 
 change this to not get the last item, which I assume is #6  ? 

Nah it goes up to #7, and you'd have to modify the fastest_cvsup script
to do it (which is easy), but it's not the point. I like things from
ports to be default as much as possible so when they get updated I don't
have to remember what little mods I've made in the past. Plus it makes
administrating multiple servers more complex. I like to try to keep
things unmodified unless absolutely necessary. :)

Cheers,
Alan.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: cvsup*.au.freebsd.org ??

2006-10-30 Thread Alan Garfield
On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 13:32 +1300, Juha Saarinen wrote:
 On 10/31/06, Alan Garfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I also find that the cvsup6.au.freebsd.org is totally useless. It
  doesn't carry src-all and this effectively makes fastest_cvsup useless
  for me because when I do 'make update' in /usr/src it selects cvs6 and
  fails.
 
 Hmm, that's Planetmirror, isn't it? Have you tried contacting them?

No I haven't had the time really. It's a minor annoyance in the grand
scheme of things. I generally just manually override SUPHOST if it
doesn't work.


  SUP_UPDATE=true
  SUPFILE=/usr/share/examples/cvsup/standard-supfile
  SUP=/usr/local/bin/csup
  SUPFLAGS=-L 2
  SUPHOST=`/usr/local/bin/fastest_cvsup -q -c au`
 
 Neat - didn't know you could put it into make.conf like that.

Indeed, it makes updating a system really easy. Also I prefer csup over
cvsup because it doesn't rely on a stack of dependencies that are
otherwise unused on my systems.

Cheers,
Alan. 

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Squid2.6/WCCP2/GRE

2006-10-27 Thread Alan Garfield
Hey guys,

I'm hoping someone will have a configuration of the following they can
share as I'm pulling my hair out here trying to get this to work.

I have a Cisco 1841 setup on my test bench with WCCP2 configured to
redirect web traffic to the FreeBSD squid proxy via gre.

I can see the traffic on the gre interface on the FreeBSD box, but squid
never sees the traffic and eventually the Cisco removes the cache as a
dead cache.

If anyone has a squid.conf and the proper configuration for ipfw and gre
that would be excellent!

Many thanks,
Alan.


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Weird ipf redirected traffic with WCCP

2006-02-14 Thread Alan Garfield
Hey guys,

I wonder if you can help me figure out why my squid proxy never sees any
traffic on the loopback,3128

I've setup ipf to log everything and it appears after the redirection it
immediately gets spat out the ethernet interface to be lost in the
ether. Why on earth would the routing table / ipf doing that?? Squid
sees nothing and nothing appears on the loopback interface.

==

Feb 15 10:57:24 thing3 ipmon[296]: 10:57:24.071776 fxp0 @-1:-1 p
204.21.169.1 - 204.21.169.66 PR gre len 20 (72) IN
Feb 15 10:57:24 thing3 ipmon[296]: 10:57:24.071791 gre0 @-1:-1 p
192.168.1.28,2147 - 127.0.0.1,3128 PR tcp len 20 48 -S IN NAT
Feb 15 10:57:24 thing3 ipmon[296]: 10:57:24.071824 fxp0 @-1:-1 p
127.0.0.1,3128 - 192.168.1.28,2147 PR tcp len 20 48 -AS OUT

==

Any ideas?

Thanks,
Alan.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Re[2]: FreeBSD 6.x / GRE / WCCP / Squid

2005-12-07 Thread Alan Garfield
On Wed, 2005-12-07 at 23:55 +0200, Cezar Fistik wrote:
 Hello Alan,
 
 Wednesday, December 7, 2005, 5:46:41 AM, you wrote:
 
  ipfw conf
  -
 
  ipfw add 50 fwd 127.0.0.1,3128 tcp from any to any 80
 
 Sorry for missleading you with wccp version2, my mistake.

No problem.

 Now, is it a mistake or you changed the port squid listens on? First
 time it was 8080. Could you try to add in via gre0 to you fwd rule?

Yes I change the port, I've not done the obvious thing and used the
wrong port. :) I've also tried using in via gre0, that part is working
perfectly. I can see the packets getting forwarded by the rule logging
into /var/log/security, but I never see the forwarded packets on the
loopback interface

I have forwarding turned on via sysctl. Is there something I'm missing? 

 What version of FreeBSD are you using, is it a 5.3? If so, you'll have
 to upgrade to at least 5.4.

I'm running 6.0-RELEASE.

Thanks,
Alan.


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD 6.x / GRE / WCCP / Squid

2005-12-06 Thread Alan Garfield
Hello Cezar,

On Tue, 2005-12-06 at 19:48 +0200, Cezar Fistik wrote:
 Just a couple of thoughts.
 Do you realy need that tunnel? Try if it will work without it, maybe
 there's a problem with it.

I've not really got a tunnel. It's just setup as per the Squid docs to
have FreeBSD think it is. The Cisco just sends the packets encapsulated
in gre to the FreeBSD squid box. The tunnel is setup so FreeBSD will
strip the gre headers and present the system with the original
encapsulated packet on the gre0 interface.

I can see the encapsulated packets via tcpdump on gre0, and I can also
see the packets hitting my ipfw fwd rule when I turn logging on for that
rule. But I never see the forwarded packets, they just disappear!

  Second, can you see your squid in show ip
 wcccp web-cache detail from the cisco? 

Yes, the Cisco happily sends the packets and sees the cache.

 Does you squid work without
 wccp? 

Yes, the cache works perfectly without issue.

 I mean setting up the host explicitly to use the proxy? I don't
 remember precisely, I did it a long ago, but I think you should use
 wccp version 2 in order to run wccp with squid.

I've not tried version 2, but I will try it now.

 Hope that helps.

Thanks,

Alan.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD 6.x / GRE / WCCP / Squid

2005-12-06 Thread Alan Garfield
On Wed, 2005-12-07 at 08:32 +1100, Alan Garfield wrote:

  I mean setting up the host explicitly to use the proxy? I don't
  remember precisely, I did it a long ago, but I think you should use
  wccp version 2 in order to run wccp with squid.
 
 I've not tried version 2, but I will try it now.

Okay, Squid doesn't support WCCP version 2. So I decided to try to use a
route-map redirector to see if it was something else causing the issue.

Now I've have tried two was and I'm seeing the exact same problem.
Firstly I tried :-

kern conf
-

options IPFIREWALL
options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE
options IPFIREWALL_FORWARD

ipfw conf
-

ipfw add 50 fwd 127.0.0.1,3128 tcp from any to any 80


I see the packets hitting fxp0 correctly and I see the forward rules,
but nothing appears in tcpdump for lo0 nor does squid see anything
either.

So secondly I tried to us IP Filter instead. I removed all the
IPFIREWALL stuff from the kernel and I setup ipf as follows :-

ipnat.rules
--

rdr fxp0 0/0 port 80 - 127.0.0.1 port 3128 tcp


Now I can see the transactions when I do 'ipnat -s' but still nothing
appears on the lo0. I have ip forwarding turned on and the machine is
acting as a gateway.

The only thing I can think of is the packets are from a private IP range
and the proxy server is in a routable IP range in my DMZ. But if that
where a problem why do I see the packets hitting the forwarding rules
but never coming out the otherside?

Any help would be appreciated.

Thanks,
Alan.




___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


FreeBSD 6.x / GRE / WCCP / Squid

2005-12-05 Thread Alan Garfield
Hi all,

I'm hoping someone can shed some light on what's going wrong with my
setup. I've searched high and low for a solution, but I've only found
old posts talking about FreeBSD 4.x and not the later versions (nor do
any of the suggestions make any difference).

I'm trying to setup WCCP on our Cisco 1840 router. I have a DMZ with a
squid server listening on port 8080. I have got the gre0 tunnel setup
between the router with link1 option set, I can see the gre packets
coming from the router and appearing on the gre0 interface via tcpdump,
I can see the packets hitting my fwd rule in ipfw via the security log,
but I never see any traffic on the lo0 or anything hitting squid.

It seems like the packets are getting eaten after the forward. Plus I've
also noticed that the encapsulated packets appear to be going 'out' my
Ethernet interface back to the default route, even though they have been
forwarded.

An example of my setup is :-

   Net
|
|
- Cisco 
|  |
|  |
 DMZ LAN   Internal LAN
|  |
|  |
  Squid  Host


Network :


 Net: 192.168.20.0/30
 DMZ: 192.168.10.0/24
Internal: 192.168.1.0/24

 Cisco Ext: 192.168.20.1
 Cisco DMZ: 192.168.10.1
Cisco Internal: 192.168.1.1

Squid: 192.168.10.66
 Host: 192.168.1.99


Cisco conf extract :


ip wccp version 1
ip wccp web-cache redirect-list 109
!
interface Serial0/0/0:0.1 point-to-point
 ip wccp web-cache redirect out
!
access-list 109 permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 any
access-list 109 deny   ip any any


FreeBSD conf :


ifconfig gre0
-

gre0: flags=b051UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,LINK0,LINK1,MULTICAST mtu 1476
tunnel inet 192.168.10.66 -- 192.168.10.1
inet6 fe80::2e0:18ff:feb7:a79c%gre0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4 
inet 192.168.10.66 -- 10.20.30.40 netmask 0x 

ipfw list
-

00010 allow gre from any to any frag
00020 allow log tcp from any to any dst-port 80
00050 fwd 127.0.0.1,8080 tcp from 192.168.1.0/24 to any dst-port 80
00100 allow ip from any to any via lo0
00200 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8
00300 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any
65000 allow ip from any to any
65535 deny ip from any to any

rc.conf
---

gateway_enable=YES
ifconfig_fxp0=inet 192.168.10.66 netmask 255.255.255.0
defaultrouter=192.168.10.1
squid_enable=YES


Any help or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,

Alan.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]