Re: Script-friendly (parseble) ps(1) output?
| By Eduardo Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [ 2008-10-30 00:04 +0200 ] Hello, I need to write a cgi script which will print the output from ps(1) in a table (html), so the average-operator can click on a KILL link and the cgi will send the selected signal. I need to add one ps information per column in a table (html), however, I found ps(1) output to be too hard to parse. There is no separator. I believed \t was the separator but its not. Another option might be to mount /proc and use that instead. See procfs(5). Regards, Aragon ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ipfw fwd problem - FreeBSD 5.3
Hi, I'm running a 5.3 gateway/proxy. To it is connected an ADSL modem with the 5.3 box performing the PPPoE, as well as a cisco router on another ethernet interface. My default route is out the ADSL line (tun0), but I need to be able to forward packets matched on the basis of destination port to the cisco router. I've been doing this for over a year using ipfw fwd. However, I recently upgraded from 4.7 to 5.3 and since then my ruleset no longer works. I've torn the ruleset down to just basic divert and fwd rules and just can't seem to get it behaving as it did before. My internal LAN interface is rl0. Interface to cisco router [9.9.9.9] is vx0 [8.8.8.8]. ADSL is connected to rl0, but after PPPoE encap it's tun0. My rules: 150 divert 8668 tcp from 192.168.0.2 to any dst-port 22 out recv rl0 160 count log tcp from any to 1.2.3.4 dst-port 22 200 fwd log 9.9.9.9 tcp from 8.8.8.8 to any dst-port 22 210 count log tcp from any to 1.2.3.4 dst-port 22 When I ssh from 192.168.0.2 to 1.2.3.4 this is what is logged: Feb 21 16:39:57 security.info draper kernel: ipfw: 160 Count TCP 192.168.0.2:1604 1.2.3.4:22 in via rl0 Feb 21 16:39:57 security.info draper kernel: ipfw: 210 Count TCP 192.168.0.2:1604 1.2.3.4:22 in via rl0 Feb 21 16:39:57 security.info draper kernel: ipfw: 160 Count TCP 8.8.8.8:1604 1.2.3.4:22 out via tun0 Feb 21 16:39:57 security.info draper kernel: ipfw: 200 Forward to 9.9.9.9 TCP 8.8.8.8:1604 1.2.3.4:22 out via tun0 Feb 21 16:39:57 security.info draper kernel: ipfw: 160 Count TCP 8.8.8.8:1604 1.2.3.4:22 out via tun0 Feb 21 16:39:57 security.info draper kernel: ipfw: 200 Forward to 9.9.9.9 TCP 8.8.8.8:1604 1.2.3.4:22 out via tun0 I am running PPP with -nat as well as a natd process. Any packets that are routed out the ADSL will have their source address rewritten by PPP. The seperate natd process is aliasing for vx0's address of 8.8.8.8. From what I can see above, my packets are being rewritten by rule 150 and they are matching the fwd rule at 200, but they simply aren't being forwarded as specified in the rule. Instead they're going via the default route. The end result is that the source address is rewritten again by PPP and, of course, the packet goes out the wrong interface. Any know what's up with this? Thanks, Aragon ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
opera 7.21 on 5.1
Hi, I'm trying to run Opera 7.21 with shared Qt on 5.1-RELEASE. I'm getting the following error: /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/lib/libc_r.so.5: Undefined symbol __thr_jtable I have COMPAT4x installed: $ ldconfig -r |grep libc_r 16:-lc_r.5 = /usr/lib/libc_r.so.5 68:-lc_r.3 = /usr/lib/compat/libc_r.so.3 69:-lc_r.4 = /usr/lib/compat/libc_r.so.4 Can anyone help me? Thanks, Aragon ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: port install to jail root from host system
| By Pat Lashley [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [ 2003-10-04 19:31 +0200 ] Another option is to build and package the port(s) outside the jail. Then nullfs mount /usr/ports in the jail directory and install the port(s) from the package(s). The downside of this approach is that the port needs to be installed on the host system to build the package. If you have multiple virtual host jails which are basicly identical in configuration; you might want to consider setting up one to build the packages in instead of building them on the host system. (And then install from packages in the other jails.) Thanks. I did basically that, using the -p argument to pkg_add once the package was built. Regards, Aragon ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
port install to jail root from host system
Hi, I've compiled a port as normal (apache13 in this case). I'd like to run 'make install' now and tell it to install the package to the base of the root filesystem of a jail from the jail's host. Possibly also to skip registering it in the host's package database. Does anyone know an easy way to do this with the ports system? I realise apache is dependant on various libraries that may not be in the jail, but these dependancies I will resolve manually. Thanks, Aragon ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: port install to jail root from host system
The jail does not run ssh, nor any other daemons. All it will run is apache once it is installed. It's not a full jail built from /usr/src. It'll only have what's necessary to run apache. And apache will be the only process called from the jail command. | By Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [ 2003-10-01 15:11 +0200 ] ssh into the jail and run the make install from inside of the jail On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Aragon Gouveia wrote: Hi, I've compiled a port as normal (apache13 in this case). I'd like to run 'make install' now and tell it to install the package to the base of the root filesystem of a jail from the jail's host. Possibly also to skip registering it in the host's package database. Does anyone know an easy way to do this with the ports system? I realise apache is dependant on various libraries that may not be in the jail, but these dependancies I will resolve manually. Thanks, Aragon ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AME DynaMiTe USB ADSL Modem
Hi, Has anyone had experience with getting an AME DynaMiTe USB ADSL modem working under FreeBSD? So far I've had no luck. Any help appreciated. Thanks, Aragon To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
jumping sound with maestro3 card
Hi, Can anyone comment on their experience with Maestro3 cards under FreeBSD and XFree86? I've just recently set mine up. I'm finding sound output (xmms) incredibly jerky. Anyone else experienced the same thing? Any help appreciated. Thanks, Aragon To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: jumping sound with maestro3 card
| By Adam Weinberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [ 2002-11-24 20:28 +0200 ] Yes. I have a Dell Inspiron 8100 laptop, p3/1.2Ghz, half a gig of RAM. When I play streaming mp3s the sound is fine, but playing tracks locally is a mess. Mine's an Inspiron 8000, p3/1GHz, same ammount of RAM. I've found streaming (over LAN) and locally played files to both be jumpy. Sound from movie playback as well, which in turn is causing the video to jump too. I've only tried xmms and mplayer so far, but with my past experience of getting sound working properly on this system, all apps will probably do the same thing. I had the same problems even in windows - sound playback only became smooth after *alot* of BIOS and driver updates. I'm convinced the Maestro3 is just a crap card. :) *sigh* I was going to use this laptop for my band's live shows... boot a custom kernel that would dedicate the system solely to becoming a sampler, but the blips and skips were too ridiculous. Yea. I was hoping to wipe Windows from my notebook. Been setting up and playing with FreeBSD 5.0-DP2 this weekend and have been VERY pleased with how it runs on my notebook. Version 4 has always been useless for me because of no cardbus support. The latest nvidia drivers even work pretty darn well too. I guess Windows will have to stay until I get a notebook with decent sound hardware. Thanks, Aragon To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
ipfw dynamic rules in 4.7-RC
Hi, I'm having problems with ipfw in 4.7-RC WRT dynamic rulesets. Even though dynamic rules are being created, these aren't being checked by check-state. Output from 'ipfw -d show'. 00010 0 0 check-state 00100 2816 1208852 allow tcp from any to 66.8.x.y 25 keep-state setup 65535 994218 419055474 allow ip from any to any ## Dynamic rules: 00100 17 768 (T 81, slot 9) - tcp, 196.41.x.y 8220- 66.8.x.y 25 00100 743 591302 (T 300, slot 243) - tcp, 196.3.x.y 4830- 66.8.x.y 25 If it weren't for my default allow rule, smtp wouldn't work on 66.8.x.y. Anyone experiencing the same? Thanks, Aragon To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
