[Fwd: Re: Domain name for local network?]

2004-01-22 Thread Benjamin Meade
Mauricio wrote:
Assuming you a using a router to go outside, what you call your 
internal network is your own business.  Only problem would be if someone 
from the outside had to access it.
Once a dns server is set as authoritive, doesn't it try to update the root
servers regarding the domain?
--
Benjamin Meade
System Administrator
LanWest Pty Ltd
Ph:  +61 (8) 9440 3033
Fax: +61 (8) 9440 3370
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Please help me update my address book

2004-02-10 Thread Benjamin Meade
Buck Jones wrote:

sorry for the inconvenience Freebsd-Questions,

I'm updating my address book. Please take a moment to update
your latest contact information. Your information is stored in
my personal address book and will not be shared with anyone
else. Plaxo is free, if you'd like to give it a try.
only enter the information you want me to have. I will share
this with no one...I just like to have a good contact list. it
saves on bounced emails..
Click the following link to correct or confirm your information: https://www.plaxo.com/edit_contact_info?r=21475104694-14407503--157195037
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/35443.html

--
Benjamin Meade
System Administrator
LanWest Pty Ltd
Ph:  +61 (8) 9440 3033
Fax: +61 (8) 9440 3370
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Sendmail rule questions

2004-02-19 Thread Benjamin Meade
Hey all,

Just wondering if sendmail (not procmail) can reject messages from a specific 
user that are above a certain size?

--
Benjamin Meade
System Administrator
LanWest Pty Ltd
Ph:  +61 (8) 9440 3033
Fax: +61 (8) 9440 3370
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: FreeBSD 5.3

2004-02-24 Thread Benjamin Meade
Caio Souza Mendes wrote:
Then, it wants to say that version 5.3 will not be
stable and yes release? 
No, the RELENG tag indicates a stable build. The CURRENT tag is used for 
non-stable (development) build.

--
Benjamin Meade
System Administrator
LanWest Pty Ltd
Ph:  +61 (8) 9440 3033
Fax: +61 (8) 9440 3370
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Monitoring bandwidth usage by user

2004-03-04 Thread Benjamin Meade
Roop Nanuwa wrote:

Hello all,
  Is there any way to get live (or even just logged) monitoring of 
bandwidth
usage by user instead of just an aggregate amount for the entire 
machine/interface?
Squid can do it. There are quite a few perl scripts that can build a webpage 
from the log files and show you nice pretty graphs and such.

This is assuming that by user you mean machines that are accessing the net 
through a gateway.

--
Benjamin Meade
System Administrator
LanWest Pty Ltd
Ph:  +61 (8) 9440 3033
Fax: +61 (8) 9440 3370
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Will FreeBSD work on my hardware?

2004-04-13 Thread Benjamin Meade
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to try FreeBSD, but I have some problem hardware that I'm 
having trouble getting Linux on.  It's an AMD64 with an NForce ethernet, 
and an external Iomega Zip Drive plugged into the USB port.  Also, I 
want to dual-boot with Window XP, and I want read access to the NTFS 
partition.  Is it doable?
Everything is doable.

Firstly, decide on which release you want - 5.x or 4.x. 4.x is the stable 
version, but I don't know if it supports the amd64 chipset. According to the 
website (http://www.freebsd.org/platforms/amd64.html) it is a fully supported 
chipset, but I don't see mention of it under the 4.x release notes. Maybe 
somebody more familar with the 4.x series could fill in this blank.

For compatable hardware, see
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.2.1R/hardware.html
or
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/4.9R/hardware.html
Dual booting with windows should present no major problems as long as you read 
the manual before experimenting. And backup your data beforehand. Searching 
through the archives of this list seems to indicate that GAG is the way to go 
(http://gag.sourceforge.net/). I've never acutally used it, so do a bit of 
research before jumping in.

Readonly access to NTFS partitions should work fine. Writing is even supported 
to a limited extent. See 
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=mount_ntfs&sektion=8
for more info.

Also, google can solve a lot of time. (Searching for, say, "howto dual boot 
freebsd windows xp"), and the freebsd website has a LOT of info.

Hope this helps.

--
Benjamin Meade
System Administrator
LanWest Pty Ltd
Ph:  +61 (8) 9440 3033
Fax: +61 (8) 9440 3370
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: ufs HDD on the MS Windows ?

2004-04-14 Thread Benjamin Meade
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hello !

How it is possible to connect a disk with FreeBSD ufs file system to a
computer with OS MS Windows?
Is it special driver?
I think, it can be made using a Vmware...
How to make easier? What variants exist?
If you're talking about getting windows to actually read the hard disk, then 
your out of luck. About the only way I can think of doing it is to share the 
disk over a network.

--
Benjamin Meade
System Administrator
LanWest Pty Ltd
Ph:  +61 (8) 9440 3033
Fax: +61 (8) 9440 3370
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Checking New Password

2004-04-20 Thread Benjamin Meade
Marshall Pierce wrote:

These may be helpful:
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2003/10/30/FreeBSD_Basics.html
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2001/01/17/FreeBSD_Basics.html
If I may just raise a small caution flag with regard to the top 
article/application. The author states:

"...don't panic over the telnet word. The insecure telnet service isn't running 
on ..."

The major insecurities in telnet are still present using this method of 
generating passwords. Instead of a sniffer getting the actual password, they get 
a list of six. Note that this is only using the network version, not the client 
side system.

On the other hand, wrapping the communication with the server in ssl sounds like 
a very good solution for user passwords. You could even use a website in perl 
over https.

HmmmI know what I'll be doing for the next few hours. :)

--
Benjamin Meade
System Administrator
LanWest Pty Ltd
Ph:  +61 (8) 9440 3033
Fax: +61 (8) 9440 3370
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"