Re: which jdk?
Miguel schrieb: hi, i need to install tomcat 5 in a client's server running freebsd-6.0R, i know there is a port in /usr/ports/www/tomcat55, so far so good, in http://www.freebsd.org/java/ there are many options, which one do you recommend, native?: --- miguel ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" I have jdk 1.4 and tomcat 5.0 on FreeBSD 4.11-Release running now for months without problems. I'm just starting to test 1.5/5.5 on 6.0R and built jdk-1.5 successfully, but it is beta. Otherwise 1.3/1.4 is said to be used "at their own risk"... Ben ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: How to install x-windows in freeBSD
Hi Anirban, a very good place to start is the handbook, chapter 5. Most important is to know the monitor specifications, video adapter chipset, the video adapter memory and to create a initial xorg.conf with Xorg -configure If you've done this already and still hung, you need to supply detailed information to the list. Best, Ben Anirban Adhikary schrieb: Hi guys ,This is Anirban here.I have just installed freeBSD 6.0 and i have installed it properly.But i am not able to see any graphics on it.So my question is that how i can install x-window system in freeBSD environment. Hope i will receive my reply soon. with regards Anirban. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
doxygen 1.4.1 --> 1.4.6 error (solved)
Hi all, I stumbled on this error while portupgrading doxygen 1.3.6 to 1.4.1 one year ago and here is an old friend again ;-): Transcript written on doxygen_manual.log. cp ../doc/doxygen_logo.eps . cp ../doc/doxygen_logo.gif . Running latex again to get a .dvi file... latex doxygen_manual.tex This is pdfeTeX, Version 3.141592-1.21a-2.2 (Web2C 7.5.4) ---! /root/.texmf-var/web2c/latex.fmt was written by tex (Fatal format file error; I'm stymied) gmake[1]: *** [doxygen_manual.dvi] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/data/ports/devel/doxygen/work/doxygen-1.4.6/latex' gmake: *** [pdf] Error 2 *** Error code 2 Stop in /data/ports/devel/doxygen. Just in case someone stumbles on it, too remove ~/.texmf-var (see /usr/ports/UPDATING, 20050213 for more information). Ben ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Postgresql 8.0 again
At first I did't find ipc_check.pl. You'll need the postgresql source tree: contrib/ipc_check/ipc_check.pl. I also found ipcclean what may do the same like a reboot does... and ipcs gives some status information. Best, Ben Mike Jeays schrieb: I just re-installed postgresql80-server from the ports, and get exactly the same error as from the package. This is on my 5.4 machine, were I previously had a working copy. I have tried changing max_connections in the sample config file (setting it down to 1 just to see if even that would work). I also tried the following kernel setting changes (without a reboot), with no improvement. sysctl -w kern.ipc.shmall=32768 sysctl -w kern.ipc.shmmax=134217728 sysctl -w kern.ipc.semmap=256 Error message from initdb ... ... creating configuration files ... ok creating template1 database in /usr/local/pgsql/data/base/1 ... FATAL: could not create semaphores: No space left on device DETAIL: Failed system call was semget(1, 17, 03600). HINT: This error does *not* mean that you have run out of disk space. It occurs when either the system limit for the maximum number of semaphore sets (SEMMNI), or the system wide maximum number of semaphores (SEMMNS), would be exceeded. You need to raise the respective kernel parameter. Alternatively, reduce PostgreSQL's consumption of semaphores by reducing its max_connections parameter (currently 10). The PostgreSQL documentation contains more information about configuring your system for PostgreSQL. child process exited with exit code 1 initdb: removing data directory "/usr/local/pgsql/data" Any more help will be very welcome! ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Postgresql 8.0 again
Reboot always helped for me. Otherwise see http://www.webservertalk.com/message292349.html. Maybe this helps. Best, Ben Mike Jeays schrieb: I just re-installed postgresql80-server from the ports, and get exactly the same error as from the package. This is on my 5.4 machine, were I previously had a working copy. I have tried changing max_connections in the sample config file (setting it down to 1 just to see if even that would work). I also tried the following kernel setting changes (without a reboot), with no improvement. sysctl -w kern.ipc.shmall=32768 sysctl -w kern.ipc.shmmax=134217728 sysctl -w kern.ipc.semmap=256 Error message from initdb ... ... creating configuration files ... ok creating template1 database in /usr/local/pgsql/data/base/1 ... FATAL: could not create semaphores: No space left on device DETAIL: Failed system call was semget(1, 17, 03600). HINT: This error does *not* mean that you have run out of disk space. It occurs when either the system limit for the maximum number of semaphore sets (SEMMNI), or the system wide maximum number of semaphores (SEMMNS), would be exceeded. You need to raise the respective kernel parameter. Alternatively, reduce PostgreSQL's consumption of semaphores by reducing its max_connections parameter (currently 10). The PostgreSQL documentation contains more information about configuring your system for PostgreSQL. child process exited with exit code 1 initdb: removing data directory "/usr/local/pgsql/data" Any more help will be very welcome! ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: openoffice-2 & openssl-beta-0.9.8a
> * Benjamin Thelen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-12-2005 21:15:25 +0100]: >> I'm a bit of a loss, no answer, no help by google, but I can't be the >> only >> one who faces this problem. How are you dealing with this? Do I overlook >> something? > > Just force the thing to install and don't give another thought to that > openssl dependency: > > pkg_add -f .tgz > > "f" like ... force! ;-) Martin, Usually "force" is something I like avoid ;-). Nevertheless I did it your way :-). But I additionally had to delete the dependency to openssl-beta, because portupgrade complained. I don't know it this was the best idea... Two messages were a little annoying, please see below. I don't know if it's bad to see "dependency registration is incomplete". . . . pkg_add: can't open dependency file '/var/db/pkg/openssl-beta-0.9.8a/+REQUIRED_BY'! dependency registration is incomplete pkg_add: warning: package 'de-openoffice.org-2.0.20051202' requires 'perl-threaded-5.8.7', but 'perl-5.8.7' is installed And I really don't know where this perl-threaded comes from - I even couldn't find a port called like this - I suppose, it's a knob. Best, Ben > > HTH, > Martin > > -- > Martin Möller - ICQ # 82221572 > GnuPG/PGP (DSA) Schlüssel-ID: 06746BEE - FAbdruck > 9D2E 943F A669 50E4 A638 E42F 2699 2A76 0674 6BEE > ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: openoffice-2 & openssl-beta-0.9.8a
Hello Mike, thanks for your response! I suppose you're using the ports openssl instead of the base system. Thus your solution is definitely a good way as far as I can see, but I would like to keep the base system openssl if possible. Best, Ben > Hi Benjamin, > > I had the same problem. The solution to this problem for me was the > portupgrade "-o" option to replace openssl-beta with openssl-stable and > update all the dependencies. Have a look in the portupgrade man page. > There is an example how to use this option. For me it looked something > like 'portupgrade -o security/openssl-stable openssl-beta' to get rid of > the beta dep. > Actually I don't know at what point openssl is important to openoffice > and if this might lead to some issues. However, I didn't have any > problems so far. > Greetings, > Mike > > Benjamin Thelen wrote: >> You FreeBSD guys, >> >> This is a kind of reposting, I got no response to this question (Why? Is >> there something wrong how I write my my question(s)?), whether list >> (archives) nor google told me something _really_ helpful - just stupid >> work arounds -sorry. >> >> I suppose there are many of you using the OpenOffice-2.0 package from >> http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/ which requires >> openssl-beta-0.9.8a >> to be installed (I don't understand why). >> >> Installing openssl-beta from ports at first doesn't hurt. But at the >> stage >> of portupgrading next time it starts to be a pain, so I end up removing >> openoffice-2 and openssl-beta _before_ I do a portupgrade. If I don't >> remove both ports, any port that requires openssl is built with >> openssl-beta instead of openssl from the base system. If I add >> WITH_OPENSSL_BASE=yes, which seemd to be a good solution, net-snmp >> (required for kdeutils) complains that it cannot build if there is a >> newer >> openssl version installed by a port. There we are again, byebye >> openssl-beta/openoffice, portupgrade, reinstall both. >> >> >> I'm a bit of a loss, no answer, no help by google, but I can't be the >> only >> one who faces this problem. How are you dealing with this? Do I overlook >> something? >> >> >> Thanks, >> Ben >> >> ___ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" >> >> > > ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: openoffice-2 & openssl-beta-0.9.8a
> On Friday 09 December 2005 15:36, Benjamin Thelen wrote: >> > On Friday 09 December 2005 12:15, Benjamin Thelen wrote: >> >> You FreeBSD guys, >> >> >> >> This is a kind of reposting, I got no response to this question (Why? >> Is >> >> there something wrong how I write my my question(s)?), whether list >> >> (archives) nor google told me something _really_ helpful - just >> stupid >> >> work arounds -sorry. >> >> >> >> I suppose there are many of you using the OpenOffice-2.0 package from >> >> http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/ which requires >> >> openssl-beta-0.9.8a >> >> to be installed (I don't understand why). >> >> >> >> Installing openssl-beta from ports at first doesn't hurt. But at the >> >> stage >> >> of portupgrading next time it starts to be a pain, so I end up >> removing >> >> openoffice-2 and openssl-beta _before_ I do a portupgrade. If I don't >> >> remove both ports, any port that requires openssl is built with >> >> openssl-beta instead of openssl from the base system. If I add >> >> WITH_OPENSSL_BASE=yes, which seemd to be a good solution, net-snmp >> >> (required for kdeutils) complains that it cannot build if there is a >> >> newer >> >> openssl version installed by a port. There we are again, byebye >> >> openssl-beta/openoffice, portupgrade, reinstall both. >> >> >> >> >> >> I'm a bit of a loss, no answer, no help by google, but I can't be the >> >> only >> >> one who faces this problem. How are you dealing with this? Do I >> overlook >> >> something? >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Ben >> >> Mike, >> Thanks for your answer. >> >> > You allready have the answer, you said it works when you build from >> > ports. If you don't want to always rebuild openoffice when you upgrade >> > ports mark it as ignored in pkgtools.conf. >> >> I already did - just because I don't want to compile OOo. Building OOo-2 >> on a PIII/1,13 isn't very funny. :-). OOo-1.1 was a little nightmare, >> especially because it took me a while to succeed - you'd surely find on >> google ;-). Last but not least, I don't have 9 free GBs. Really. :-) >> >> I just don't understand why the package I mentioned requires openssl, >> because I can't see any dependency on openssl, neither for building nor >> for running. >> >> >> A third way would be to use the ports openssl-beta as systems default? >> >> Ben >> >> > -Mike > > Your better off leaving openssl set to the one in base and building from > source anything that depends on openssl. The problem with packages is you > are at the mercy of how someone else built them. Mike, Yes, but this case is a little strange, isn't it? Nobody else is wondering, there actually is no dependency on openssl, using the ports openssl, even a beta may be a litte uncommon (?) and I think this URL I mentioned is the main source for getting OOo as a package. Despite the problem I face, thanks to Nakata Maho at this point for his work. > > I also don't see where the openssl dependency is comming from and have to > take your word for it the package of open office you tried had one. Short and clear ;-): [EMAIL PROTECTED] pkg_add /data/software/freebsd/OOo_2.0m143_FreeBSD60Intel_install_de.tbz pkg_add: could not find package openssl-beta-0.9.8a ! > > If your installed open office was built by you and works I highly > recommend > you back it up, something like > > pkg_create -b /var/db/pkg/openoffice.org-2.0.0_1 and save the resulting > openoffice.org-2.0.0_1.tgz somewhere safe. Now if in the future yoy want > to upgrade it again from source and it doesn't work you always have a > known > good copy to fall back on. That sounds interesting. I never used pkg_create. Thanks for your hint, I'll have a look at this and look for a fast compiling machine :-)! Thanks for your response! Best, Ben > > -Mike > > > > ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: openoffice-2 & openssl-beta-0.9.8a
> On Friday 09 December 2005 12:15, Benjamin Thelen wrote: >> You FreeBSD guys, >> >> This is a kind of reposting, I got no response to this question (Why? Is >> there something wrong how I write my my question(s)?), whether list >> (archives) nor google told me something _really_ helpful - just stupid >> work arounds -sorry. >> >> I suppose there are many of you using the OpenOffice-2.0 package from >> http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/ which requires >> openssl-beta-0.9.8a >> to be installed (I don't understand why). >> >> Installing openssl-beta from ports at first doesn't hurt. But at the >> stage >> of portupgrading next time it starts to be a pain, so I end up removing >> openoffice-2 and openssl-beta _before_ I do a portupgrade. If I don't >> remove both ports, any port that requires openssl is built with >> openssl-beta instead of openssl from the base system. If I add >> WITH_OPENSSL_BASE=yes, which seemd to be a good solution, net-snmp >> (required for kdeutils) complains that it cannot build if there is a >> newer >> openssl version installed by a port. There we are again, byebye >> openssl-beta/openoffice, portupgrade, reinstall both. >> >> >> I'm a bit of a loss, no answer, no help by google, but I can't be the >> only >> one who faces this problem. How are you dealing with this? Do I overlook >> something? >> >> >> Thanks, >> Ben > Mike, Thanks for your answer. > You allready have the answer, you said it works when you build from ports. > If you don't want to always rebuild openoffice when you upgrade ports > mark it as ignored in pkgtools.conf. I already did - just because I don't want to compile OOo. Building OOo-2 on a PIII/1,13 isn't very funny. :-). OOo-1.1 was a little nightmare, especially because it took me a while to succeed - you'd surely find on google ;-). Last but not least, I don't have 9 free GBs. Really. :-) I just don't understand why the package I mentioned requires openssl, because I can't see any dependency on openssl, neither for building nor for running. A third way would be to use the ports openssl-beta as systems default? Ben > > -Mike > > ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: How often portupgrades?
> Just wondering what a good rule of thumb is in how often to run > portupgrades. Kiffin, In my opinion, there is no. If you need an upgrade, go for it, if not, why portupgrade? You don't need to follow each little jump of version. > > I figure that once a week should be sufficient, however each time it runs > it can take up to a few hours to complete which seems like an unnecessary > hassle to me. Once it even started rebuilding the complete gnome port > which took a couple days! I think, that's how it is. You are off better of having a fast machine to create your packages yourselves, which you then distribute to slower machines. Mine is a PIII/1,13 I run portupgrade between once a week and once a month. Compiling time (I use KDE) is usually done within one night. The last gnomeupdate.sh wasn't funny. That infact took the machine days to rebuild all the ports. Hope that helps a little. Ben > > Is this worthwhile? What are the benefits? > > Thanks alot in advance. > > > Kiffin Gish > Gouda, The Netherlands > ___ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
openoffice-2 & openssl-beta-0.9.8a
You FreeBSD guys, This is a kind of reposting, I got no response to this question (Why? Is there something wrong how I write my my question(s)?), whether list (archives) nor google told me something _really_ helpful - just stupid work arounds -sorry. I suppose there are many of you using the OpenOffice-2.0 package from http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/ which requires openssl-beta-0.9.8a to be installed (I don't understand why). Installing openssl-beta from ports at first doesn't hurt. But at the stage of portupgrading next time it starts to be a pain, so I end up removing openoffice-2 and openssl-beta _before_ I do a portupgrade. If I don't remove both ports, any port that requires openssl is built with openssl-beta instead of openssl from the base system. If I add WITH_OPENSSL_BASE=yes, which seemd to be a good solution, net-snmp (required for kdeutils) complains that it cannot build if there is a newer openssl version installed by a port. There we are again, byebye openssl-beta/openoffice, portupgrade, reinstall both. I'm a bit of a loss, no answer, no help by google, but I can't be the only one who faces this problem. How are you dealing with this? Do I overlook something? Thanks, Ben ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
openssl, OpenOffice-2.0, make.conf
Hi list, Since I've installed openssl-beta-0.9.8a which is required in order to install the OpenOffice-2.0 package from http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/, I'v always problems running portuprade, because the ports openssl is often used for compiling instead of the base openssl. I then found the switch WITH_OPENSSL_BASE=yes which I added to make.conf. Everthing seemd to be ok until the last portupgrade "session" which stopped while trying to upgrade net-snmp, which is a debendency of kdeutils with the follwing error: Dependency error: this port wants the OpenSSL library from the FreeBSD base system. You can't build against it, while a newer version is installed by a port. Please deinstall the port or undefine WITH_OPENSSL_BASE. I try to upgrade these ports: kdeutils-3.4.3 < needs updating (port has 3.4.3_1) net-snmp-5.2.1.2< needs updating (port has 5.2.2) I now of course could alwayse remove openssl-beta-0.9.8a and openoffice.org-2, before using portupgrade, but that cannot be the right way to do, can it? As a last info: I set OOo-2 to "held", because I don't want it upgraded by portupgrade. de-openoffice.org-2.0.20051104_1 < [held] needs updating (port has 2.0.20051128) Does anybody have an idea? How do you manage this? Different OOo2-package? Using only the ports openssl-beta? Thanks, Ben ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD 6.0 in VMware
David Miao schrieb: On 11/29/05, 赵铭 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: the reason of the error ,i think it's the vmware and you real machine check the processor *MHZ is not the same number. i start my vmware ,the vmware can tall me the message. On 11/29/05, Konrad Heuer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, 29 Nov 2005, David Miao wrote: I installed a freebsd 6.0 in vmware 5.5, why I get a mass of error message of "calcu runtime error"? I installed PC-BSD 1.0rc1 which is in turn based on 6.0 within a VMware GSX server and encountered no problems. Regards Konrad Heuer GWDG, Am Fassberg, 37077 Goettingen, Germany, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -- == 姓 名:赵铭 电 话:13001067593 [EMAIL PROTECTED] == 赵铭, 谢谢,我禁用了ACPI,现在似乎好了。 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" Hi, I have 6.0 running even on VMWARE 3.2.1. No Problems. Ah, no, I can't install the VMWARE-Tools, but that happend to be under FreeBSD 5.4, too. Regards, Ben ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: broken openssl on freebsd60
Russell E. Meek schrieb: Benjamin Thelen wrote: Russell E. Meek schrieb: Jeff D. Hamann wrote: OpenSSL is in the base system and the library version should be 4, not 3. Is there some reason you're installing it from the ports? I have no idea. I didn't know it was part of the base system, but when I went to install apache2, postgresql, etc, those ports wanted to install the openssl port or at least they used to. - Original Message - From: "Lowell Gilbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jeff D. Hamann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2005 7:29 AM Subject: Re: broken openssl on freebsd60 "Jeff D. Hamann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I should preface this with "I'm not sure if this is correct but I've got a server running that doesn't make exstensive use of openssl and everything seems to run alright for the apps I've been running"... so, I've been trying to install a new server using the openssl port and keep finding problems with the openssl libs... $ pwd /usr/local/lib $ ls -la libssl* -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 516602 Nov 26 12:23 libssl.a lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Nov 26 12:23 libssl.so -> libssl.so.4 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 318507 Nov 26 12:23 libssl.so.4 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 12 Sep 16 09:59 libssl3.so -> libssl3.so.1 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 155344 Sep 16 10:00 libssl3.so.1 $ should those be: lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 12 Sep 16 09:59 libssl3.so -> libssl.so.3 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 155344 Sep 16 10:00 libssl.so.3 or some such thing, because when I attempt to start something like postgresql81, I get: $ psql /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libssl.so.3" not found, required by "psql" $ I need to get the following apps running on the new FREEBSD 6.0 machine: 1) openssl then, 2) apache2 3) subversion 4) uw-imap 5) postgresql81 or postgresql80+postgis 6) php etc, etc, etc and I'm concerned that none of those will work with the current status of openssl on freebsd 6.0. I'm running $ uname -a FreeBSD bobby.xxx.xxx 6.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #1: Fri Nov 18 10:47:37 PST 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 OpenSSL is in the base system and the library version should be 4, not 3. Is there some reason you're installing it from the ports? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" Another user had a similar issue like this with OpenSSL, here is what I advised him to do which in the end worked perfectly. Edit your make.conf file *"/etc/make.conf" *and please in the following: *WITH_OPENSSL_BASE=yes *This will cause all future installed ports to build against the base version of OpenSSL rather than trying to install the port version as a dependency. You can then uninstall the port version of openssl *"/usr/ports/security/openssl make deinstall clean"* Once the uninstall is complete, reinstall all OpenSSL required ports either by using portupgrade or by manually deinstalling and then reinstalling the port as they will now build against the base version of OpenSSL. Hi, I already read your posting a few days ago. What I don't understand is, that openssl is per default within the base system, isn't it? So, I would suppose that any port, which requires openssl, would take it from the base rather than from ports? At least, I never installed a port, installing openssl from ports as a dependency (e.g. php5-openssl). I don't really get it. Could you explain why this switch in make.conf is needed then? This would also mean, that I would have to upgrade the base system openssl to openssl-beta in order to be able to install OOo-2 as having openssl within the base system _and_ openssl-beta as a port obviously leads to little confusion. Thanks, Ben Thanks, Russell ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" Ben, Sorry about the confusion, make.conf is the global register that all ports look to for build information. By default ports requiring dependancies will build these dependancies according to their individual make file (normally ports.) (man make.conf) will show you more in depth about what the make.conf is file and many of the global registers that can be used. Hello Russel, Thanks for the clarification
Re: missing $libdir in/for postgis?
Jeff D. Hamann schrieb: I'm sure this is a really lamo question but... I'm trying to get the postgis port up (which it has installed with postgresql81 just fine so far) and when I went to add the spatial caps to a simple database using the script lwpostgis.sql, I got the following: test=# \i lwpostgis.sql BEGIN psql:lwpostgis.sql:35: NOTICE: type "histogram2d" is not yet defined DETAIL: Creating a shell type definition. psql:lwpostgis.sql:35: ERROR: could not access file "$libdir/liblwgeom.so.1": No such file or directory ...blah, blah, blah... psql:lwpostgis.sql:3149: ERROR: current transaction is aborted, commands ignored until end of transaction block ROLLBACK test=# I thought to myself, "odd", but no big deal. I thought I should verify the file "liblwgeom.so.1" is in the /usr/local/lib dir. It is. $ ls /usr/local/lib/liblw* /usr/local/lib/liblwgeom.so /usr/local/lib/liblwgeom.so.1 $ The $libdir isn't assigned to anything becuase I didn't see anything when I typed the command: $ echo $libdir $ So should I simply set this variable in one of my login scripts (.cshrc, .bshrc,.shrc, .login) or is this something that should be (have been) set somewhere else? I'm installing the latest port on FreeBSD 6.0 amd64. $ uname -a FreeBSD bobby.forestinformatics.com 6.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #2: Sun Nov 27 14:07:55 PST 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 $ Jeff. --- Jeff D. Hamann Forest Informatics, Inc. PO Box 1421 Corvallis, Oregon USA 97339-1421 541-754-1428 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.forestinformatics.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" Hi, I also posted this error, twice to the list and once to the maintainer (hope, everthings all right!), but no resonse up to now. I do not know, where this error suddenly comes from, earlier 1.0.x releases where ok. As a workaround check what "pg_config --pkglibdir" sais, I suppose "/usr/local/lib/postgresql". Then create a symlink in /usr/local/lib/postgresql pointing to /usr/local/lib/liblwgeom.so.1. Best, Ben ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: broken openssl on freebsd60
Russell E. Meek schrieb: Jeff D. Hamann wrote: OpenSSL is in the base system and the library version should be 4, not 3. Is there some reason you're installing it from the ports? I have no idea. I didn't know it was part of the base system, but when I went to install apache2, postgresql, etc, those ports wanted to install the openssl port or at least they used to. - Original Message - From: "Lowell Gilbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jeff D. Hamann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2005 7:29 AM Subject: Re: broken openssl on freebsd60 "Jeff D. Hamann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I should preface this with "I'm not sure if this is correct but I've got a server running that doesn't make exstensive use of openssl and everything seems to run alright for the apps I've been running"... so, I've been trying to install a new server using the openssl port and keep finding problems with the openssl libs... $ pwd /usr/local/lib $ ls -la libssl* -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 516602 Nov 26 12:23 libssl.a lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Nov 26 12:23 libssl.so -> libssl.so.4 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 318507 Nov 26 12:23 libssl.so.4 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 12 Sep 16 09:59 libssl3.so -> libssl3.so.1 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 155344 Sep 16 10:00 libssl3.so.1 $ should those be: lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 12 Sep 16 09:59 libssl3.so -> libssl.so.3 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 155344 Sep 16 10:00 libssl.so.3 or some such thing, because when I attempt to start something like postgresql81, I get: $ psql /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libssl.so.3" not found, required by "psql" $ I need to get the following apps running on the new FREEBSD 6.0 machine: 1) openssl then, 2) apache2 3) subversion 4) uw-imap 5) postgresql81 or postgresql80+postgis 6) php etc, etc, etc and I'm concerned that none of those will work with the current status of openssl on freebsd 6.0. I'm running $ uname -a FreeBSD bobby.xxx.xxx 6.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #1: Fri Nov 18 10:47:37 PST 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 OpenSSL is in the base system and the library version should be 4, not 3. Is there some reason you're installing it from the ports? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" Another user had a similar issue like this with OpenSSL, here is what I advised him to do which in the end worked perfectly. Edit your make.conf file *"/etc/make.conf" *and please in the following: *WITH_OPENSSL_BASE=yes *This will cause all future installed ports to build against the base version of OpenSSL rather than trying to install the port version as a dependency. You can then uninstall the port version of openssl *"/usr/ports/security/openssl make deinstall clean"* Once the uninstall is complete, reinstall all OpenSSL required ports either by using portupgrade or by manually deinstalling and then reinstalling the port as they will now build against the base version of OpenSSL. Hi, I already read your posting a few days ago. What I don't understand is, that openssl is per default within the base system, isn't it? So, I would suppose that any port, which requires openssl, would take it from the base rather than from ports? At least, I never installed a port, installing openssl from ports as a dependency (e.g. php5-openssl). I don't really get it. Could you explain why this switch in make.conf is needed then? This would also mean, that I would have to upgrade the base system openssl to openssl-beta in order to be able to install OOo-2 as having openssl within the base system _and_ openssl-beta as a port obviously leads to little confusion. Thanks, Ben Thanks, Russell ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: broken openssl on freebsd60
Lowell Gilbert schrieb: "Jeff D. Hamann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I should preface this with "I'm not sure if this is correct but I've got a server running that doesn't make exstensive use of openssl and everything seems to run alright for the apps I've been running"... so, I've been trying to install a new server using the openssl port and keep finding problems with the openssl libs... $ pwd /usr/local/lib $ ls -la libssl* -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 516602 Nov 26 12:23 libssl.a lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Nov 26 12:23 libssl.so -> libssl.so.4 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 318507 Nov 26 12:23 libssl.so.4 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 12 Sep 16 09:59 libssl3.so -> libssl3.so.1 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 155344 Sep 16 10:00 libssl3.so.1 $ should those be: lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 12 Sep 16 09:59 libssl3.so -> libssl.so.3 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 155344 Sep 16 10:00 libssl.so.3 or some such thing, because when I attempt to start something like postgresql81, I get: $ psql /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libssl.so.3" not found, required by "psql" $ I need to get the following apps running on the new FREEBSD 6.0 machine: 1) openssl then, 2) apache2 3) subversion 4) uw-imap 5) postgresql81 or postgresql80+postgis 6) php etc, etc, etc and I'm concerned that none of those will work with the current status of openssl on freebsd 6.0. I'm running $ uname -a FreeBSD bobby.xxx.xxx 6.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #1: Fri Nov 18 10:47:37 PST 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 OpenSSL is in the base system and the library version should be 4, not 3. Is there some reason you're installing it from the ports? Hi, The OOo-2 from porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/ wants openssl-beta. No Problem to install this port, but portupgrading (at least phpmyadmin and phppgadmin) lead to little confusion. I first had to remove openssl-beta, OOo2, then run portupgrade -aRr and then reinstall openssl-beta and OOo2. Maybe there is a better way?? Why is OOo-2 built with openssl-beta? Ben ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: PANIC on 6.0-BETA-1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all! Yesterday I tried moving from RELENG_5 to RELENG_6 with a custom kernel. Used cvsup for getting files. Panic details follow at the end. Here is what I did: 1. make clean in /usr/src 2. removed stale obj files. 3. commented out the NO_INFO and other knobs in /etc/make.conf I had as I got error messages. 4. ran make buildworld 5. ran make buildkernel KERNCONF=MYKERNEL. Got dependency error about IPDIVERT. It said IPFIREWALL was required so I commented it out. 6. removed /usr/obj/usr/srs/sys/MYKERNEL directory 7. ran make buildkernel KERNCONF=MYKERNEL 8. ran make installkernel KERNCONF=MYKERNEL The system boots ok displaying copyright stuff, CPU features,ACPI stuff+links and goes booboo to here: nvidia:0 mem 0xde00 - 0xdeff,0xd000-0xd7ff irq 16 at device 0.0 pci " Warning: Device driver " Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address= 0x480008 fault cod= supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer = 0x20:0xc07ff748 stack pointer = 0x28:0xc14207cc frame pointer = 0x28:0xc14207cc code segment= base 0x0, limit 0x, type 0x16 = DPL0, pres 1, def 32 1 gran 1 processor eflags=interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL=0 current process =0(swapper) trap number =12 panic: page fault uptime 1s The problem is I can't boot in 5.4-STABLE either At boot up I escape to loader prompt hit boot kernel.old Boot up and spits out Can't work out which disk we are booting from Guessed BIOS disk 0x not found by probes, defaulting to disk0 panic face: guard1 fail @ 0x67b44 from /usr/src/sys/i386/loader/../../common/modul.c:957 -> Press any key to reboot <- A little info about my system: 512MB RAM AMD Seprom 2500+ CPU 2 disk system - ad0 and ad1 - FreeBSD is on ad1 Have nvidia_load="YES" in loader.conf and snd_driver_all="YES" MYKERNEL is a generic kernel I have used for 5.x series with a little tweaks such as COMPAT_4x, device io and mem Sorry I can't post it but currently I do not have access to it. Can you advise of workarounds and get back my system running? I'm thinking of 6.0-beta1 disk2 as a start, compiling a 6.0 generic kernel. If that fails I'm considering the 6.0-beta1 disk1 as a second resort - hitting upgrade button. If that fails too - 5.4-based or some other live cd Thanks in advance! Have a nice day, Dimitar Vassilev ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" Hi, Just a short shot, as the error message you've posted is not really talkative, but 'Warning: Device driver "' and 'nvidia_load="YES" in loader.conf' leads me to the assumption, that your problem is the nvidia module. Try removing _everything_ that is non-standard, e.g. everything what loads additional modules! Ben ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: G550 dual-head problems
Eric Ekong wrote: Here is my working config, before I upgraded to the parhelia... attached... Eric * Benjamin Thelen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050630 09:48]: Hi List, I really would appreciate your help, because I ran out of ideas! Basically dual-head works, but only with a little workaround: If I start X, with the xorg.conf I attached, the second monitor simply isn't activated, although the desktop is expanded to the second monitor! I first have to comment out "Screen 0" and "Screen 1" within both 'Section "Device"' for Card0 and Card1. If I then start X, the second monitor is activated in cloning mode. After "reaktivating" the "Screen 0" and "Screen 1" entries, which I just have commented out, dual-head works. Do you have an idea what is wrong in my xorg.conf? I "played" around for example with commenting out "Xinerama", removing the second 'Section "Device"' for Card1, but without success. Kind Regards, Benjamin Section "ServerLayout" Identifier "Dual-Monitor" Screen 0 "Screen0" Screen 1 "Screen1" RightOf "Screen0" InputDevice"Mouse0" "CorePointer" InputDevice"Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard" # Option "Clone" "off" EndSection Section "ServerFlags" Option "Xinerama" "true" EndSection Section "Files" RgbPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb" ModulePath "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TTF/" #FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/" #FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/CID/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/" #FontPath"/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo/" FontPath"/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/URW/" FontPath"/usr/local/share/fonts/" FontPath"/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/" #FontPath"/usr/local/share/fonts/override/" FontPath"/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/bitstream-vera/" #FontPath"/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic/" #FontPath"/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/latin2/" #FontPath"/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/local/" #FontPath"/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/PEX/" FontPath"/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TrueType/" #FontPath"/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/latin2/100dpi/" #FontPath"/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/latin2/75dpi/" EndSection Section "Module" Load "extmod" Load "glx" #Load "dri" Load "dbe" Load "record" Load "xtrap" Load "type1" Load "freetype" #Load "speedo" EndSection Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Keyboard0" Driver "kbd" Option "XkbModel" "pc105" Option "XkbLayout" "de" Option "XkbVariant" "nodeadkeys" EndSection Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Mouse0" Driver "mouse" Option "Protocol" "auto" Option "Device" "/dev/sysmouse" Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5" EndSection Section "Monitor" ##DisplaySize 400 300 # mm #Identifier "Monitor0" #VendorName "IVM" #ModelName"2140" Option"DPMS" Identifier"Monitor0" VendorName"IIyama" ModelName "A201HT" HorizSync 30-130 VertRefresh 50-160 EndSection Section "Monitor" Identifier"Monitor1" VendorName"IIyama" ModelName "A201HT" HorizSync 30-130 VertRefresh 50-160 Option"DPMS" EndSection Section "Device" ### Available Driver options are:- ### Values: : integer, : float, : "True"/"False", ### : "String", : " Hz/kHz/MHz" ### [arg]: arg optional #Option "SWcursor" # [] #Option "HWcursor" # [] #Option "PciRetry" # [] #Option &
G550 dual-head problems
Hi List, I really would appreciate your help, because I ran out of ideas! Basically dual-head works, but only with a little workaround: If I start X, with the xorg.conf I attached, the second monitor simply isn't activated, although the desktop is expanded to the second monitor! I first have to comment out "Screen 0" and "Screen 1" within both 'Section "Device"' for Card0 and Card1. If I then start X, the second monitor is activated in cloning mode. After "reaktivating" the "Screen 0" and "Screen 1" entries, which I just have commented out, dual-head works. Do you have an idea what is wrong in my xorg.conf? I "played" around for example with commenting out "Xinerama", removing the second 'Section "Device"' for Card1, but without success. Kind Regards, Benjamin Section "ServerLayout" Identifier "Dual-Monitor" Screen 0 "Screen0" Screen 1 "Screen1" RightOf "Screen0" InputDevice"Mouse0" "CorePointer" InputDevice"Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard" # Option "Clone" "off" EndSection Section "ServerFlags" Option "Xinerama" "true" EndSection Section "Files" RgbPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb" ModulePath "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TTF/" #FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/" #FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/CID/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/" #FontPath"/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo/" FontPath"/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/URW/" FontPath"/usr/local/share/fonts/" FontPath"/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/" #FontPath"/usr/local/share/fonts/override/" FontPath"/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/bitstream-vera/" #FontPath"/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic/" #FontPath"/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/latin2/" #FontPath"/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/local/" #FontPath"/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/PEX/" FontPath"/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TrueType/" #FontPath"/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/latin2/100dpi/" #FontPath"/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/latin2/75dpi/" EndSection Section "Module" Load "extmod" Load "glx" #Load "dri" Load "dbe" Load "record" Load "xtrap" Load "type1" Load "freetype" #Load "speedo" EndSection Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Keyboard0" Driver "kbd" Option "XkbModel" "pc105" Option "XkbLayout" "de" Option "XkbVariant" "nodeadkeys" EndSection Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Mouse0" Driver "mouse" Option "Protocol" "auto" Option "Device" "/dev/sysmouse" Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5" EndSection Section "Monitor" ##DisplaySize 400 300 # mm #Identifier "Monitor0" #VendorName "IVM" #ModelName"2140" Option"DPMS" Identifier"Monitor0" VendorName"IIyama" ModelName "A201HT" HorizSync 30-130 VertRefresh 50-160 EndSection Section "Monitor" Identifier"Monitor1" VendorName"IIyama" ModelName "A201HT" HorizSync 30-130 VertRefresh 50-160 Option"DPMS" EndSection Section "Device" ### Available Driver options are:- ### Values: : integer, : float, : "True"/"False", ### : "String", : " Hz/kHz/MHz" ### [arg]: arg optional #Option "SWcursor" # [] #Option "HWcursor" # [] #Option "PciRetry" # [] #Option "SyncOnGreen" # [] #Option "NoAccel" # [] #Option "ShowCache" # [] #Option "Overlay" # [] #Option "MGASDRAM" # [] #Option "ShadowFB" # [] #Option "UseFBDev" # [] #Option "ColorKey" # #Option "SetMclk" # #Option "OverclockMem" # [] #Option "VideoKey" # #Option "Rotate"# [] #Option "TexturedVideo" # [] #Option "Crtc2Half" # [] #Option "Crtc2Ram" # #Option "Int10" # [] #Option "AGPMode" # #Option "AGPSize" # #Option "DigitalScreen1"# [] #Option "DigitalScreen2"# [] #Option "TV"# [] #Option "TVStandard"
Re: ndis0 dhcp question
Bryan Maynard wrote: Hello all! :-D I have a Linksys WPC11 ver.4 wireless NIC. I got it setup using ndisgen (very cool tool by the way). Now when kldload /root/rtl8180_sys.ko (the location of my wireless kernel object) dmesg shows this: ndis0: port 0x1000-0x10ff mem 0x88 00-0x880001ff irq 11 at device 0.0 on cardbus1 ndis0: NDIS API version: 5.1 ndis0: Ethernet address: 00:0f:66:cf:10:7e ndis0: 11b rates: 1Mbps 2Mbps 5.5Mbps 11Mbps and when I run ifconfig -a I get this: ::My onboard ethernet NIC xl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 options=9 inet6 fe80::204:76ff:fe48:9301%xl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 inet 192.168.1.101 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 ether 00:04:76:48:93:01 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active ::I don't know what this is. . . plip0: flags=108810 mtu 1500 ::Loopback device lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3 ::My Linksys WPC11 ver.4 ndis0: flags=8802 mtu 1500 ether 00:0f:66:cf:10:7e media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect status: no carrier ssid "" channel -1 authmode OPEN powersavemode OFF powersavesleep 100 rtsthreshold 2312 protmode CTS wepmode OFF weptxkey 1 I have several questions, but I'll ask them one at a time. . . I have a Linksys WRT54G Wireless Router. Currently my onboard NIC is what I use to access the net and stuff. How do I assign an IP address - and any other needed parameters - to my wireless NIC, activate it, and use it instead of (or along with) my onboard ethernet NIC? I know about using ifconfig blah blah blah, but what paramaters do I pass and where do I get them? Thanks, Bryan Hi Bryan, something like this: ifconfig ndis0 ssid wepmode on wepkey 0x<1234567> I alway had to issue this command-line twice - don't know why. To automate this on boot-time using dhcp, there is /etc/dhclient.conf, where you have to add the parameters like ssid, wepmode and wepkey. I didn't try this yet. I haven't been able to use my ndis-card with dhcp (issuing "killall dhclient" && "dhclient ndis0" by hand), while my ath-card at least got a "dhcp-address" once :-). Ben ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
256 MB not enough RAM for Desktop-FreeBSD, a strange experience
Hi list, I started using FreeBSD as a Desktop in December 04 with the hardware configuration below FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p2 Asus TUSL-C with PIII-1133 256 MB RAM WDC WD800JB KDE 3.3.2 OOo-1.1.4 Very often OpenOffice-1.4 died on starting, just showing the splash screen. I couldn't kill the process, even not with "-9". So I had to reboot. Because of KDEs behavior to start applications, which have been used before, OpenOffice was started automatically on KDEs startup. Mostly successful. OpenOffice started a bit more reliable using XFCE4... In combination with this FreeBSD was hanging on the end of a shutdown: No buffers busy after final sync I didn't find very helpful information on the net, but since I added 256 MB of RAM I have never seen one of these errors. Does someone have any idea what that could have been caused? Adding more RAM, gaining stability, gaining speed, ok... Ben ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: ssh root@localhost
Gert Cuykens wrote: Why does it not accept my password ? I# ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] Password: Password: Password: Permission denied (publickey,keyboard-interactive). I# ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ssh root access is per default not permitted, as far as I know. Log on as ordinary user, the su to root. Ben ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: php4-extensions broken dependency
Matthew Seaman wrote: On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 09:06:46AM -0500, dave wrote: I've installed apache2 and mod_php4 and configured the extensions_dir setting in php.ini. I then went to install lang/php4-extensions, but one of the extensions i selected is mcve, marked as broken. When i try to get around this the install detects my previous configuration choices. A make clean;make distclean does not solve this. Suggestions welcome. See ports(7): # make rmconfig or # make configure Cheers, Matthew I've stumbled across your answer regarding the manpage ports(7). I'm running 4.10-RELEASE-p3. The target showconfig (didn't want to delete my config) is working, but not docoumented in the manpage. I suppose rmconfig would run as well and isn't documented, too. How is this? I found these targets documented in the online manpage of 5.3-RELEASE and Ports. Thanks, Ben ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: portdb corrupt?
James Hong wrote: Hi i have problem updating the portdb since i cvsup portversion/portupgrade or anything will fail with same or similar msgs. Im not certain how I can start already tried portsdb -F but didnt make difference any help or comment is welcome flute# portsdb -uU Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please wait..Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: freeciv-gtk2-1.14.2 Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: fvwm-imlib-2.4.19 Done. done [Updating the portsdb in /usr/ports ... - 11889 port entries found .1000.2000.3000.4000.5000.60 00.7000.8000./usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/portsdb.r b:587: [BUG] Segmentation fault ruby 1.8.2 (2004-07-29) [i386-freebsd4] Abort (core dumped) James H ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" James, Kent Stewart explained what to do and how that came on 11/2/04 subject "portupgrade core dump fix". Maybe it should have considered a security problem, as it is such a basic and widely used procedure and thus somehow security relevant? When will 4.11 released? :-) I suppose this bug is fixed in 4.11. Kind Regards, Benjamin ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Install error OOo-1.1.3 on 4.10p3
epilogue wrote: On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 17:59:16 +0200 Benjamin Thelen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi lists, I am now really stumped and appreciate you for your assistance. I had this very error already with OOo-1.1.2 on three 4.10p2 FreeBSD boxes in the end of August, posted it to the list, but got no answer. I got along by installing a 1.1.0 package and hoped that this error will be solved in future ports. Compiling seems alright. This error-message occurs right after "make install". # # UGLY hack to not have to specify a X-Display. # /usr/X11R6/bin/Xvfb :1001 -screen 0 800x600x24 > /dev/null 2>&1 & echo $! > /data/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/.Xvfb.pid cd: can't cd to /data/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/OOo_1.1.3_src/instsetoo/ *.pro/01/normal/ *** Error code 2 Stop in /data/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1. Does anybody know, what's wrong here? I then tried "pkg_add -r openoffice-1.1", but the files couldn't be found. After this I asked google, found packages, but they were build against x.org (see thread initiated by Nakata Maho, diskussing using x.org or xFree86). Are there any packages built against xFree86 available? until such time as other packages are made available, you can try what i have done in the past - installing OO despite having the wrong X server. this method has been successful for me numerous times: 1) download the pkg for your system 2) pkg_add -f openoffice-[ver] 3) pkgdb -Fu# almost all the xorg/xfree pieces have very similar names, so selecting the correct dependency is straightforward. only with XFree86-fontScalable might you have to make a choice between Type1 or TrueType. both seem to work, but with slightly different results (i'm not sure which is best and don't much care - but if you read-up on it, you should be able to figure it out). 4) start openoffice and enjoy. Hi, Sounds very good! I'll check it out as soon Don and I got along with debugging this error! Thank's to you as well! Ben ... or do you generally recommend switching to x.org? while xorg is now default on 5.3, what they will do with 4.11 is unclear (at least to me). either system (xorg/xfree) will work and both should be available via ports for the forseeable future. in short, it is a matter of preference (or features) -- and a decision which is entirely up to you. =] hth, epi Sorry, to bother, thanks for your help! Ben ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-openoffice To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Install error OOo-1.1.3 on 4.10p3
Hi lists, I am now really stumped and appreciate you for your assistance. I had this very error already with OOo-1.1.2 on three 4.10p2 FreeBSD boxes in the end of August, posted it to the list, but got no answer. I got along by installing a 1.1.0 package and hoped that this error will be solved in future ports. Compiling seems alright. This error-message occurs right after "make install". # # UGLY hack to not have to specify a X-Display. # /usr/X11R6/bin/Xvfb :1001 -screen 0 800x600x24 > /dev/null 2>&1 & echo $! > /data/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/.Xvfb.pid cd: can't cd to /data/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/OOo_1.1.3_src/instsetoo/ *.pro/01/normal/ *** Error code 2 Stop in /data/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1. Does anybody know, what's wrong here? I then tried "pkg_add -r openoffice-1.1", but the files couldn't be found. After this I asked google, found packages, but they were build against x.org (see thread initiated by Nakata Maho, diskussing using x.org or xFree86). Are there any packages built against xFree86 available? ... or do you generally recommend switching to x.org? Sorry, to bother, thanks for your help! Ben ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: IBM Thinkpad R51 & FreeBSD 4.10???
Hakim Z. Singhji wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi All, I recently purchased an IBM Thinkpad R51 and I was looking to install FreeBSD 4.10. Has anyone ever done this? Should I anticipate any problems? Lastly I have never installed FreeBSD on a laptop before are there things that I should know before I get started? Thanks in advance for you help. HZS -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBN9WwlT9WV6TztkoRAol1AJ9CJU9EOAA976RAfYOQNI6v4tf/OgCgkyPC rnr5z0hnkABA5QNVyNnQ1KM= =n2Vy -END PGP SIGNATURE- Hi, I have successfully installed 4.10 on a R31 and a T22. There is some info on the internet for older IBMs, but not much (see below). Sound does work. PCMCIA (16 bit!) should do, but I still could not test. USB is working well. Modem (winmodem) does more ore less *not* work. There is even a port (comms/ltmdm), providing a kernel-module, but I did not test it. To setup X-Window with KDE is easy. Overall, FreeBSD 4.10 on those IBMs, no Problem. http://homepage.univie.ac.at/l.ertl/thinkpad/index.html http://groups.google.de/groups?q=freebsd+thinkpad&start=10&hl=de&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=200206051237.00014.metrol_metrol.net%40ns.sol.net&rnum=20 http://groups.google.de/groups?q=freebsd+thinkpad&start=60&hl=de&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=c6v6h3%24evs%241%40FreeBSD.csie.NCTU.edu.tw&rnum=61 I found this in GENERIC: # If you have a ThinkPAD, uncomment this along with the rest of the PCVT lines #optionsPCVT_SCANSET=2 # IBM keyboards are non-std I suppose R51 will be similar. Hope that helps. FreeBSD 5.x may be a better choice (ACPI, Cardbus,...whatever), but I still have no 5.x installation anywhere. Good luck, Ben ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
FreeBSD 4.9: Server Works GCSL --> unknown chipset
Hello list, First off, the environment: FreeBSD 4.9 RELEASE, Intel P4 3GH with HTT enabled Mainboard ASUS NRL-L533 North Bridge: ServerWorks CMIC-SL South Bridge: ServerWorks CSB6 I checked google and the mailing list archive but couldn't find helpful (for me) information on this. A client brought us a server to install FreeBSD 4.9 on it, but the chipset isn't recognized by the system. I had to disable DMA in the BIOS to get FreeBSD booting off the IDE-HDD. I then read the Hardware Release notes (I know, it's too late): FreeBSD 4.9: ServerWorks CSB5 ATA66/ATA100 FreeBSD 5.2: ServerWorks CSB5 and CSB6 ATA66/ATA10 According to this, it is the only way to install 5.2? Would 4.9-stable recognize the chipset? Is that lack fundamental to the whole system or would it suffice to just buy a new IDE-Controller? I was so happy to have our client conviced of FreeBSD, that it would be a pity, if that faild now. Thanks very much in advance, Benjamin dmesg: Copyright (c) 1992-2003 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE #0: Mon Oct 27 17:51:09 GMT 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.06GHz (3065.82-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf27 Stepping = 7 Features=0xbfebfbff OV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE> Hyperthreading: 2 logical CPUs real memory = 1073721344 (1048556K bytes) avail memory = 1039736832 (1015368K bytes) Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc053f000. Warning: Pentium 4 CPU: PSE disabled Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled md0: Malloc disk Using $PIR table, 10 entries at 0xc00f1ce0 npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface pcib0: on motherboard pci0: on pcib0 bge0: mem 0xfe00-0xfe00 irq 12 at device 3.0 on pci0 bge0: Ethernet address: 00:0c:6e:ec:8f:0d miibus0: on bge0 brgphy0: on miibus0 brgphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX, 1000baseTX- FDX, auto pci0: at 9.0 irq 10 isab0: at device 15.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0x9400-0x940f,0x9800-0x9803,0xa000-0xa 007,0xa400-0xa403,0xa800-0xa807 at device 15.1 on pci0 ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 ohci0: mem 0xfc00-0xfc000fff irq 11 at device 15.2 on pci0 usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb0: on ohci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: (0x1166) OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 4 ports with 4 removable, self powered pcib255: on motherboard pci255: on pcib255 pcib1: on motherboard pci1: on pcib1 orm0: at iomem 0xc-0xc7fff on isa0 pmtimer0 on isa0 fdc0: ready for input in output fdc0: cmd 3 failed at out byte 1 of 3 atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 atkbd0: flags 0x1 irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa-0xb on isa0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 sio0: type 16550A sio1 at port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa0 sio1: type 16550A ppc0: parallel port not found. ad0: 114473MB [232581/16/63] at ata0-master BIOSDMA ad1: 114473MB [232581/16/63] at ata0-slave WDMA2 acd0: DVD-ROM at ata1-master PIO4 Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a stray irq 7 stray irq 7 stray irq 7 stray irq 7 stray irq 7 too many stray irq 7's; not logging any more ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: php4-cgi --> internal server errror (solution)
> Hi, > > I think I know what you're talking about, it's the UMN Mapserver for GIS > application. Basically it's the php-mapscript part which needs php to be > compiled as cgi. It's a wonderful open source GIS app which works very > nice > and very stable once configured correctly but it's a major pain in the > butt > to get it right. > > As for the internal server error "premature end of script header", it > could > be either one of the many reasons : > - the http header is not properly generated. > - wrong permission > - wrong directory path > - apache port is screwed. > - php4-cgi port is screwed. > - and some other reasons unknown. > > Try writing a simple php script which contains and cat > it > through the php binary in your cgi-bin. See if it generates proper HTTP > header + all the config stuffs correctly. I upgraded to php4.3.3rc4 from > the > port on my own box and I have different problem altogether. The last > working > version of php compiled as cgi for me is from 4.3.0 version, that is, not > installing from port but by hand instead (tar xzvf, config,...manually). > So > try by hand as well, and see if anything changes. You do have a backup > copy > of last working php-cgi binary, don't you ? > > Sorry can't help any farther but I share your pain man. > > Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 21:12:08 +0200 (CEST) > From: "Benjamin Thelen (CCGIS)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: php4-cgi --> internal server errror > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 > > Hi, > > sorry, I've already posted this into the German user list, but as I am > still completely stuck I hope to find some more hints/help here. > > Systems: > FreeBSD 4.7 (mod_php4 - a little changed)& 4.8 (php4-cgi - the latest) > Apache 1.3.27 and 28 > > > > We need to run php as cgi, because of the requirements of software we run > (called umn-mapserver - if somebody knows). Half a year ago I basically > followed the instructions I found on the umn-mapserver wiki-pages: > > I quote, that's shorter: > (http://mapserver.gis.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?PHPMapScriptCGI) > > > PHP's default 'configure' behavior is to build a 'php' CGI executable. > It's the --with-apxs and/or --with-apache PHP configure options that > enable PHP to be built as an Apache DSO. > > ...to build PHP as a CGI ... don't provide the --with-apxs or > --with-apache switch to the PHP configure. > > Then once you have a 'php' executable, copy it to your server's cgi-bin > directory and add to your httpd.conf: > > > AddType? application/x-httpd-php .php3 > AddType? application/x-httpd-php .phtml > AddType? application/x-httpd-php .php > > > Action application/x-httpd-php /cgi-bin/php > > > > As I could not find an ordinary php-port (not sure now, it's month ago), I > removed one "--with-apxs" entry within the Makefile from www/mod_php4 (!) > and php ran as cgi! > > Half a year later, I updated the ports-tree and I was happy to see a > www/php4-cgi port and immediately checked this out on a test system. This > time, I did not edit the php4-cgi makefile of course, as I expected to > have php4 as cgi compiled. I again copied the php-binary, as said above to > cgi-bin and surprisingly saw only "500 - internal server error" and I > found a "Premeture end of script headers: /usr/local/www/cgi-bin/php in > httpd-error.log. > > One thing you have to know is, that our scripts are in > /usr/local/www/data/"our-php-application". This worked on this 4.7/this > edited mod_php4-system very well. > > I posted to the Germany user list, checked google. I found a few hints, > but nothing really helped. > e.g.: > http://www.php.net/manual/en/security.cgi-bin.php > http://httpd.apache.org/docs/howto/cgi.html > > My question basically is: > How do I setup this php/cgi environment? > > One way, I was told and can be found on php.net is to add a > "#!/usr/local/lib/php" on top of every php-Skript and all scripts need > chmod a+x and need to be in /cgi-bin. This would work. But it is a little > uncomfortable way and the main thing is that it would not work with our > "php-application", which is a set of css, html, php, pictures, so > pictures, css, etc would be parsed, too! > > > There are other solutions, one with an AddHandler directive in httpd.conf, > but I don't get that running. > > As it worked half a year ag
php4-cgi --> internal server errror
Hi, sorry, I've already posted this into the German user list, but as I am still completely stuck I hope to find some more hints/help here. Systems: FreeBSD 4.7 (mod_php4 - a little changed)& 4.8 (php4-cgi - the latest) Apache 1.3.27 and 28 We need to run php as cgi, because of the requirements of software we run (called umn-mapserver - if somebody knows). Half a year ago I basically followed the instructions I found on the umn-mapserver wiki-pages: I quote, that's shorter: (http://mapserver.gis.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?PHPMapScriptCGI) PHP's default 'configure' behavior is to build a 'php' CGI executable. It's the --with-apxs and/or --with-apache PHP configure options that enable PHP to be built as an Apache DSO. ...to build PHP as a CGI ... don't provide the --with-apxs or --with-apache switch to the PHP configure. Then once you have a 'php' executable, copy it to your server's cgi-bin directory and add to your httpd.conf: AddType? application/x-httpd-php .php3 AddType? application/x-httpd-php .phtml AddType? application/x-httpd-php .php Action application/x-httpd-php /cgi-bin/php As I could not find an ordinary php-port (not sure now, it's month ago), I removed one "--with-apxs" entry within the Makefile from www/mod_php4 (!) and php ran as cgi! Half a year later, I updated the ports-tree and I was happy to see a www/php4-cgi port and immediately checked this out on a test system. This time, I did not edit the php4-cgi makefile of course, as I expected to have php4 as cgi compiled. I again copied the php-binary, as said above to cgi-bin and surprisingly saw only "500 - internal server error" and I found a "Premeture end of script headers: /usr/local/www/cgi-bin/php in httpd-error.log. One thing you have to know is, that our scripts are in /usr/local/www/data/"our-php-application". This worked on this 4.7/this edited mod_php4-system very well. I posted to the Germany user list, checked google. I found a few hints, but nothing really helped. e.g.: http://www.php.net/manual/en/security.cgi-bin.php http://httpd.apache.org/docs/howto/cgi.html My question basically is: How do I setup this php/cgi environment? One way, I was told and can be found on php.net is to add a "#!/usr/local/lib/php" on top of every php-Skript and all scripts need chmod a+x and need to be in /cgi-bin. This would work. But it is a little uncomfortable way and the main thing is that it would not work with our "php-application", which is a set of css, html, php, pictures, so pictures, css, etc would be parsed, too! There are other solutions, one with an AddHandler directive in httpd.conf, but I don't get that running. As it worked half a year ago and as there is a similar way in IIS, to map an extension (.php) to an application (c:\php\bin\php.exe), I suppose that there is a similar way, but I am just to blind to find the solution! My second question is: Why did it work with those instructions from umn-mapserver wiki-pages and why does the same thing not work now? One way to find out, what's wrong, was to cp /bin/cat to /usr/local/www/cgi-bin/php. But the error is the same. I would be very grateful for hints/help! Thanks in advance! Best Regards, Benjamin ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"