the portupgrade apache21 dice throw
Hi, Whenever I portgrade apche (port is www/apache21), I would get the error: find: /usr/local/include/apr-1/apr.h: No such file or directory But sometimes it would work without the error. I think what I did has time was to deinstall the required by apache21 packages and apache21 by force, reinstall, and fixup the portsdb inconsistency later. But I could not pinpoint what is causing the problem. Anyone else is sufferring from this ? Any cure ? Regards. -cs ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help with GIANT-LOCKED in REL5.3
Hi, Anyone knows if GIANT-LOCKED is something new in 5.3 ? I have on the same machine running 5.2 which does not have any giant-locked in dmesg. The only difference is that I changed the bios to boot 5.3 from the 3ware raid drive. (oh, and I disabled a lot unused drivers in the 5.3 kernel config.) Thanks. -chacs 5.3 messages: Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot/kernel/kernel Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: Copyright (c) 1992-2004 The FreeBSD Project. Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE #0: Mon Mar 7 17:46:05 EST 2005 Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/YMIR Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: CPU: Intel Pentium III (801.82-MHz 686-class CPU) Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0x686 Stepping = 6 Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: Features=0x383fbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,MMX,FXSR,SSE Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: real memory = 536858624 (511 MB) Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: avail memory = 519880704 (495 MB) Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: ACPI APIC Table: ASUS P2B-DS Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 1 Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 0 Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: ioapic0 Version 1.1 irqs 0-23 on motherboard Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: npx0: [FAST] Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: npx0: math processor on motherboard Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: npx0: INT 16 interface Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: acpi0: ASUS P2B-DS on motherboard Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: acpi0: Overriding SCI Interrupt from IRQ 9 to IRQ 20 Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: acpi0: Power Button (fixed) Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: Timecounter ACPI-safe frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: acpi_timer0: 24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz port 0xe408-0xe40b on acpi0 Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: cpu0: ACPI CPU on acpi0 Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: cpu1: ACPI CPU on acpi0 Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: acpi_button0: Power Button on acpi0 Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: pcib0: ACPI Host-PCI bridge port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: pci0: ACPI PCI bus on pcib0 Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: agp0: Intel 82443BX (440 BX) host to PCI bridge mem 0xe400-0xe7ff at device 0.0 on pci0 Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: pcib1: PCI-PCI bridge at device 1.0 on pci0 Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: pci1: PCI bus on pcib1 Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: pci1: display, VGA at device 0.0 (no driver attached) Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: isab0: PCI-ISA bridge at device 4.0 on pci0 Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: isa0: ISA bus on isab0 Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: atapci0: Intel PIIX4 UDMA33 controller port 0xd800-0xd80f,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 4.1 on pci0 Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: ata0: channel #0 on atapci0 Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: ata1: channel #1 on atapci0 Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: pci0: serial bus, USB at device 4.2 (no driver attached) Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: pci0: bridge, PCI-unknown at device 4.3 (no driver attached) Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: pci0: mass storage, SCSI at device 6.0 (no driver attached) Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: dc0: ADMtek AN985 10/100BaseTX port 0xb800-0xb8ff mem 0xe080-0xe08003ff irq 19at device 9.0 on pci0 Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: miibus0: MII bus on dc0 Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: ukphy0: Generic IEEE 802.3u media interface on miibus0 Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: ukphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: dc0: Ethernet address: 00:20:78:1d:3a:b4 Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: dc0: if_start running deferred for Giant Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: dc0: [GIANT-LOCKED] Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: twe0: 3ware Storage Controller. Driver version 1.50.01.002 port 0xb400-0xb40f mem 0xdf80-0xdfff irq 17 at device 11.0 on pci0 Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: twe0: [GIANT-LOCKED] Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: twe0: 2 ports, Firmware FE7X 1.05.00.068, BIOS BE7X 1.08.00.048 Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: atkbdc0: Keyboard controller (i8042) port 0x64,0x60 irq 1 on acpi0 Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: atkbd0: AT Keyboard irq 1 on atkbdc0 Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: kbd0 at atkbd0 Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: orm0: ISA Option ROMs at iomem 0xc8000-0xc8fff,0xc-0xc7fff on isa0 Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: pmtimer0 on isa0 Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: sc0: System console at flags 0x100 on isa0 Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: sc0: VGA 16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300 Mar 7 18:04:13 ymir kernel: vga0: Generic ISA VGA at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem
Re: Help with GIANT-LOCKED in REL5.3
Kris Kennaway wrote: On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 08:50:06PM -0500, Chiang Seng Chang wrote: Hi, Anyone knows if GIANT-LOCKED is something new in 5.3 ? It's just a status message, under earlier versions (4.x) the ENTIRE KERNEL was giant locked. Kris The GIANT-LOCKED status message is not displayed in 5.2 also ? -chacs ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: need help: install jdk14
ls /compat/linux/lib:
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 1.1M Apr 28 2002 libc-2.2.5.so*
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 13B Sep 18 13:53 libc.so.6@ - libc-2.2.5.so
the ports are up to date.
i got this feeling that its ignoring the ALT_PKGDEP in pkgtools.conf.
-cs
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Chiang Seng Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
the error:
Checksum OK for rpm/libstdc++-2.96-112.7.1.i386.rpm.
=== Patching for linux_base-7.1_7
=== linux_base-7.1_7 depends on executable: rpm - found
=== Configuring for linux_base-7.1_7
=== Installing for linux_base-7.1_7
=== linux_base-7.1_7 conflicts with installed package(s):
linux_base-debian-3.0.23_1
They install files into the same place.
Please remove them first with pkg_delete(1).
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/java/linux-sun-jdk14.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/java/jdk14.
pkg_info | grep linux:
linux_base-debian-3.0.23_1 Debian base set for the Linux mode
pkgtools.conf:
ALT_PKGDEP = {
'emulators/linux_base' = 'emulators/linux_base-debian',
}
i'm at wits end, pls help.
You need linux-sun-jdk14 installed to bootstrap the native jdk14
build. It depends on (the Linux) libc.so.6, which it tries to get
from linux_base. However, linux_base-debian also provides that file,
so I'm not sure why it's trying to install another linux_base. Is the
file there? Are you ports up-to-date?
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: need help: install jdk14
I gave up fighting and go with the system, deinstalled linux_base-debian and let nature take its course. -cs ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
need help: install jdk14
hi,
the error:
Checksum OK for rpm/libstdc++-2.96-112.7.1.i386.rpm.
=== Patching for linux_base-7.1_7
=== linux_base-7.1_7 depends on executable: rpm - found
=== Configuring for linux_base-7.1_7
=== Installing for linux_base-7.1_7
=== linux_base-7.1_7 conflicts with installed package(s):
linux_base-debian-3.0.23_1
They install files into the same place.
Please remove them first with pkg_delete(1).
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/java/linux-sun-jdk14.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/java/jdk14.
pkg_info | grep linux:
linux_base-debian-3.0.23_1 Debian base set for the Linux mode
pkgtools.conf:
ALT_PKGDEP = {
'emulators/linux_base' = 'emulators/linux_base-debian',
}
i'm at wits end, pls help.
-cs
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: need help: install jdk14
i think i have those already. kldstat: Id Refs AddressSize Name 1 11 0xc040 35c3d8 kernel 21 0xc075d000 50dbcacpi.ko 31 0xc3e97000 6000 linprocfs.ko 41 0xc3ea5000 19000linux.ko 51 0xc41b6000 4000 if_tun.ko /etc/fstab: /dev/ad0s1a / ufs rw 1 1 /dev/ad0s2b none swap sw 0 0 /dev/ad0s3d /home ufs rw 2 2 proc /proc procfs rw 0 0 linproc /compat/linux/proc linprocfs rw 0 0 mount: /dev/ad0s1a on / (ufs, local, soft-updates) devfs on /dev (devfs, local) /dev/ad0s3d on /home (ufs, local, soft-updates) procfs on /proc (procfs, local) linprocfs on /compat/linux/proc (linprocfs, local) i am using: portupgrade -vN java/jdk14 also tried: portinstall -v java/jdk14 btw, running 5.2.1 -cs BSDjunkie wrote: --- Chiang Seng Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi, the error: Checksum OK for rpm/libstdc++-2.96-112.7.1.i386.rpm. === Patching for linux_base-7.1_7 === linux_base-7.1_7 depends on executable: rpm - found === Configuring for linux_base-7.1_7 === Installing for linux_base-7.1_7 === linux_base-7.1_7 conflicts with installed package(s): linux_base-debian-3.0.23_1 They install files into the same place. Please remove them first with pkg_delete(1). *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/java/linux-sun-jdk14. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/java/jdk14. Chiang, Been there myself. You need to load a kernel module: kldload linprocfs.ko and then mount the linux process file system. I have in my /etc/fstab: linprocfs /compat/linux/proc linprocfs rw 0 0 (the above should only be on one line) After mounting the linprocfs and doing a 'make clean', then recompiling I was able to get java installed. I know it takes a long time to compile...but it was the only way that I could get it to work myself. Hope this helps, Mark Withers ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Leaving a server on all day
I also have an always-on headless server running for like 3 years now without any problem. I use it for: apache, samba, vpn, postfix (the usual server apps). I think the key is to use the minimal (translate: cooler, less power hungry) components. Mine is P2-400 with 5400 rpm HDDs. A UPS would be a nice addition. The ONLY issue I have is it takes a few *days* to do portupgrade -ar ;-) maybe I should just remove all the X stuff. -cs Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote: On Tue, 8 Jun 2004, Jonathon McKitrick wrote: I have my desktop configured to run as a server and app server for a thin client laptop. Will running it all day without suspend mode use a lot of power? Is it true that the heat buildup in a home system (rather than a heavily fanned commercial system) will kill the drives faster and this is a good reason to turn it off during the day when I am not home? This is only my personal experience: I have got a PIII running all day for over 2 years now (my server): no problems and I am using just the small fan it came with. I had two AMD's (a K6 and now an Athlon): for both I had to buy bigger fans since they started doing strange things after a while. At work I have seen three IDE harddisks decease on workstations during the last four and a half years, but never a SCSI harddisk. These workstations are shut down and rebooted quite often. So *my* summary for your private server would be: - Leaving it on all day will not kill your harddisks, in the contrary: even cheap ones will live longer. - AMD processors tend to run hot, so if you have one, you should look for a good fan. Regards, Uli. jm -- My other computer is your windows box. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] +---+ |Peter Ulrich Kruppa| | Wuppertal | | Germany | +---+ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Leaving a server on all day
Well... X is not started automatically (a.k.a. no gdm/kdm)... sometimes I'd like to play with some X stuff... I know there are other solution, like build on a fast machine and install onto the slow one. I didn't bother because 1) the server is still working while the upgrade is taking it's own sweet time, and more importantly 2) I have no fast machine ;-) I put x11 into the ignore list in pkgtools.conf, but the recent perl 5.8 upgrade seems to ignore that and build everything anyway. -cs p.s. sorry have to resend this cos' toying with my postfix canonical settings... Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote: On Tue, 8 Jun 2004, Chiang Seng Chang wrote: I also have an always-on headless server running for like 3 years now without any problem. I use it for: apache, samba, vpn, postfix (the usual server apps). I think the key is to use the minimal (translate: cooler, less power hungry) components. Mine is P2-400 with 5400 rpm HDDs. A UPS would be a nice addition. The ONLY issue I have is it takes a few *days* to do portupgrade -ar ;-) maybe I should just remove all the X stuff. You really should do this. All your services are configured via text files anyway. Regards, Uli. +---+ |Peter Ulrich Kruppa| | Wuppertal | | Germany | +---+ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: defining knobs in pkgtools.conf question
but I found this in /var/db/pkg/python/options:
# This file is auto-generated by 'make config'.
# No user-servicable parts inside!
# Options for python-2.3.3_5
_OPTIONS_READ=python-2.3.3_5
WITH_THREADS=true
WITHOUT_HUGE_STACK_SIZE=true
WITH_UCS2=true
WITH_PYMALLOC=true
So I suppose the safest way is to install a port interactively the 1st
time and then import the options file into pkgtools.conf
-cs
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 12:48:50AM +, Andy Smith wrote:
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 02:20:55PM -0400, Chiang Seng Chang wrote:
=== quote ===
OPTIONS=THREADS Enable thread support on \
HUGE_STACK_SIZE Use a larger thread stack off \
UCS2 Use UCS2 instead of UCS4 for unicode support off \
PYMALLOC Uses python's internal malloc on
.include bsd.port.pre.mk
.if defined(WITH_THREADS)
CONFIGURE_ARGS+=--with-threads
CFLAGS+=${PTHREAD_CFLAGS}
.if defined(WITHOUT_HUGE_STACK_SIZE)
CFLAGS+=-DTHREAD_STACK_SIZE=0x2
.else
CFLAGS+=-DTHREAD_STACK_SIZE=0x10
.endif # defined(WITHOUT_HUGE_STACK_SIZE)
CONFIGURE_ENV+= LDFLAGS=${PTHREAD_LIBS} ${LDFLAGS}
.else
CONFIGURE_ARGS+=--without-threads
.if defined(LDFLAGS)
CONFIGURE_ENV+= LDFLAGS=${LDFLAGS}
.endif # defined(LDFLAGS)
.endif # defined(WITH_THREADS)
.if defined(WITHOUT_UCS2)
CONFIGURE_ARGS+=--enable-unicode=ucs4
.endif
.if defined(WITHOUT_PYMALLOC)
CONFIGURE_ARGS+=--without-pymalloc
.endif
=== end quote ===
So if I wish to put the knobs into pkgtools.conf so that it can build it
batch mode, do I:
WITH_THREADS=1
WITHOUT_HUGE_STACK_SIZE=1
I think that you only need to match the variables used in the
Makefile. So the above would be correct, and the following two
should just be omitted:
WITH_UCS2=1
WITH_PYMALLOC=1
Don't forget you'll need to set BATCH as well.
I guess my question is how to decide wheather to use WITH_XXX=1 or
WITHOUT_XXX=0 ?
Set the exact same variables as the Makefile is testing.
does WITH_XXX=0 result in #defined(WITH_XXX) returning false ?
I believe not, as defined() only tests if that name is defined,
not what its value is.
--
http://freebsdwiki.org/ - Encrypted mail welcome - keyid 0xBF15490B
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
defining knobs in pkgtools.conf question
Hi,
This is from the lang/python Makefile
=== quote ===
OPTIONS=THREADS Enable thread support on \
HUGE_STACK_SIZE Use a larger thread stack off \
UCS2 Use UCS2 instead of UCS4 for unicode support off \
PYMALLOC Uses python's internal malloc on
.include bsd.port.pre.mk
.if defined(WITH_THREADS)
CONFIGURE_ARGS+=--with-threads
CFLAGS+=${PTHREAD_CFLAGS}
.if defined(WITHOUT_HUGE_STACK_SIZE)
CFLAGS+=-DTHREAD_STACK_SIZE=0x2
.else
CFLAGS+=-DTHREAD_STACK_SIZE=0x10
.endif # defined(WITHOUT_HUGE_STACK_SIZE)
CONFIGURE_ENV+= LDFLAGS=${PTHREAD_LIBS} ${LDFLAGS}
.else
CONFIGURE_ARGS+=--without-threads
.if defined(LDFLAGS)
CONFIGURE_ENV+= LDFLAGS=${LDFLAGS}
.endif # defined(LDFLAGS)
.endif # defined(WITH_THREADS)
.if defined(WITHOUT_UCS2)
CONFIGURE_ARGS+=--enable-unicode=ucs4
.endif
.if defined(WITHOUT_PYMALLOC)
CONFIGURE_ARGS+=--without-pymalloc
.endif
=== end quote ===
So if I wish to put the knobs into pkgtools.conf so that it can build it
batch mode, do I:
WITH_THREADS=1
WITHOUT_HUGE_STACK_SIZE=1
WITH_UCS2=1
WITH_PYMALLOC=1
or
WITH_THREADS=1
WITHOUT_HUGE_STACK_SIZE=1
WITHOUT_UCS2=0
WITHOUT_PYMALLOC=0
I guess my question is how to decide wheather to use WITH_XXX=1 or
WITHOUT_XXX=0 ?
does WITH_XXX=0 result in #defined(WITH_XXX) returning false ?
Regards.
-cs
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Upgrading OpenLDAP 2.1.30 to 2.2.x
An additional question, does nss_ldap and pam_ldap works with openldap 2.2 ? -cs Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: Can portupgrade be used to upgrade OpenLDAP 2.1.x to 2.2.x by changing WITH_OPENLDAP_VER in my /etc/make.conf file to 22? Or do I have to deinstall the 21 package, and reinstall 22 and everything that depends on it? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pkg_deinstall or pkg_delete
Hi, What's the difference between pkg_deinstall and pkg_delete ? If I use portinstall to install a port, which should I use to uninstall it ? Thanx. -cs ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: installing kde-lite from port
I should have added heh heh... for self sarcasm... On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 05:38:30PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 08:31:42PM -0400, Chiang Seng Chang wrote: not a question but may be its not such a good idea after all to install kde from port on a p2-400, still compiling after 10 hours... It'll be going for a while yet. The smart thing to do on slow hardware is to install from packages. Kris ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
concurrent portinstall
while portinstall is running, is it safe to do another portinstall in another tty ? or this is a sure recipe for diaster ? -cs ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
upgrade a port
currently i have openldap client 2.1 installed. $ pkg_glob -r openldap-client-2.1.30 openldap-client-2.1.30 kdeutils-3.2.2 kdebase-3.2.2 kdenetwork-3.2.2 kdegraphics-3.2.2 kdegames-3.2.2 kdelibs-3.2.2 gnupg-1.2.4_1 samba-3.0.3.p2_1,1 if i want to use version 2.2, do i just simply: pkg_deinstall openldap-client-2.1.30 portinstall net/openldap22-client i suspect step 1 would fail because there are dependency, or switching them around would work ? as in: $ portinstall net/openldap22-client $ pkg_deinstall openldap-client-2.1.30 -cs ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: upgrade a port
portupgrade wont work because ver 22 was not installed in the first place. pkg_deinstall ver 21 wont work because there are dependencies. portinstall ver 22 wont work because ver 21 is there. how do i get out of this catch-22 ? -cs John Oxley wrote: On Fri 2004-04-23 (11:18), Chiang Seng Chang wrote: currently i have openldap client 2.1 installed. $ pkg_glob -r openldap-client-2.1.30 openldap-client-2.1.30 kdeutils-3.2.2 kdebase-3.2.2 kdenetwork-3.2.2 kdegraphics-3.2.2 kdegames-3.2.2 kdelibs-3.2.2 gnupg-1.2.4_1 samba-3.0.3.p2_1,1 if i want to use version 2.2, do i just simply: pkg_deinstall openldap-client-2.1.30 portinstall net/openldap22-client i suspect step 1 would fail because there are dependency, or switching them around would work ? as in: $ portinstall net/openldap22-client $ pkg_deinstall openldap-client-2.1.30 A better idea would be portupgrade -r openldap22-client The -r recursively upgrade all packages that are dependent on openldap22-client. if you specify -rf it will force a recompile of all ports that are dependent on it. Much better idea, although it does take longer. -Ox ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: upgrade a port
exactly what i am looking for, thx. -cs Lowell Gilbert wrote: Robert Huff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Chiang Seng Chang writes: portupgrade wont work because ver 22 was not installed in the first place. pkg_deinstall ver 21 wont work because there are dependencies. portinstall ver 22 wont work because ver 21 is there. how do i get out of this catch-22 ? pkg_delete -f old pkg pkgdb -F# just to be sure portinstall new pkg (Crude, but effective.) Slightly less crude would be something like portupgrade -o new pkg -f old pkg ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: iptables to ipfw
Thanks, everything is working now. It turns out that openvpn configures tun0 with too small a MTU which causes the black hole router effect (i think). Problems occured like able to net use samba share but unable to list files, etc. Once the MTU was upped, all seems to work now. -cs On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Chiang Seng Chang wrote: hi, anyone knows what is the equivalent of these in ipfw ? iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 10.1.0.2/32 -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 10.50.4.0/22 -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE it's for openvpn using tun0. i have setup natd using: ipfw add divert natd all from any to any via dc0 and it is working. but i would like to be more specific so that i am not nat'ing unnecessary. tried without success: ipfw add divert natd all from 10.1.0.1/32 to any via dc0 ipfw add divert natd all from 10.50.4.0/22 to any via dc0 try (from natd man page) -unregistered_only | -u Only alter outgoing packets with an unregistered source address. According to RFC 1918, unregistered source addresses are 10.0.0.0/8, 172.16.0.0/12 and 192.168.0.0/16. as an extra flag to natd thanks and regards. -cs ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
installing kde-lite from port
not a question but may be its not such a good idea after all to install kde from port on a p2-400, still compiling after 10 hours... ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
iptables to ipfw
hi, anyone knows what is the equivalent of these in ipfw ? iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 10.1.0.2/32 -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 10.50.4.0/22 -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE it's for openvpn using tun0. i have setup natd using: ipfw add divert natd all from any to any via dc0 and it is working. but i would like to be more specific so that i am not nat'ing unnecessary. tried without success: ipfw add divert natd all from 10.1.0.1/32 to any via dc0 ipfw add divert natd all from 10.50.4.0/22 to any via dc0 thanks and regards. -cs ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
