What would actually be quite nice is to have a fancy GUI install in
addition to the current one. Then at the beginning of the install you
can decide whether you really want to install FreeBSD or look at the
pretty lights in the fancy GUI version. Option 1 is choose the current
way, option 2 is go the GUI method. This gives people the flexible old
fashioned way to install while at the same time getting people through
the install who may be less experienced buy using the GUI version.
I think in general though, most people who install FreeBSD are capable
enough that they know what they are doing once you read the docs and
follow the onscreen instructions.
Corey
Jud wrote:
On Mon, 8 Mar 2004 22:28:44 -0500, Parv [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
wrote [EMAIL PROTECTED] thusly...
I just want to know what the moderator thinks about this and the
ethical conditions that are touched...
There is no official moderator per se. I think whom you are looking
for is nanny or philosopher ...
http://www.winternet.com/~mikelr/flame12.html
http://www.winternet.com/~mikelr/flame17.html
Also are these kinds of posts tolerated?
Well, you are seeing them on this list, aren't you? This will go on
until one side tires or looses interest, only to be revived some
time later. As always.
Just to shoehorn this thread back a bit in the direction whence it came:
Looking at URL: http://www.distrowatch.com/, specifically the page
hit rankings (on the right and down a little), at the moment the
5th-ranked Linux distro with an upward trend is Debian, whose install
makes FreeBSD's look like an automated marvel in comparison.
6th-ranked, also with an upward trend, is Gentoo, whose install is also
relatively non-automated and whose install instructions (the equivalent
of the Handbook sections on installation) are often noted for their
difficulty. 8th-ranked, again with an upward trend, is Slackware,
whose text-based install is very similar to FreeBSD's, with perhaps a
bit more help text available.
Granted that the top 4 distros either have automagic installs
(Mandrake, Fedora/Red Hat) or no install at all (Knoppix, the
Debian-based live CD), it appears not to be true that popularity (at
least the *nix world version) requires a graphical automated install,
were that the goal of the FreeBSD project.
Jud
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
