Anyone have any luck with DL145 G3 and 7.0
6.2 detects SATA disks 7.0 does not. Some docs suggest BIOS updates. Does anyone know why device support would drop from 7.0? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Invoking ldconfig without arguments wipes all hints and makes me very sad
I just wrote to the list about the SAME thing. I totally agree. This is like the saying 'rm' command without arguments will delete every file on your computer. I did the same thing. I wish it was a virtual system I did it to as well :) On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Shelby Cain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Greetings list. I'm a new user to FreeBSD and I just managed to introduce myself to ldconfig's default behavior. I'm currently locked out of my remote server since bash isn't statically compiled and will have to get physical access to correct my blunder. :( As a new user to FreeBSD, ldconfig's default behavior makes about as much sense to me as rm adding -fr ~ or kill adding -9 1 in the absence of arguments. I hate to sound ignorant but I have to ask, is there any particular reason FreeBSD's ldconfig defaults to this seemingly unintuitive and non-newbie-safe behavior? Would a patch that changes the behavior of ldconfig to assume -r in the absence of command line arguments and adds a new parameter like -e[rase]|-d[estroy]|-w[ipe]|-z[ap]|-l[olnewbie] to enable the original behavior be likely to gain any acceptance? Regards, Shelby Cain ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Invoking ldconfig without arguments wipes all hints and makes me very sad
The command ldconfig -v Wipes your hints without saying a thing about it. I would not call that verbose. If you want to know what I think it should output I suggest. ldconfig -v Number of paths specified 0 News Hints Size: 0 On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Shelby Cain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 23:09 +0200, Mel wrote: First of all, running ldconfig without arguments does nothing bad. Running ldconfig without flags and with arguments does. Secondly, what is the command: ldconfig /usr/lib supposed to do, according to newbie friendly logic? Because it should be possible to just have the linker create hints for one directory. Your example seems perfectly reasonable should one wish to create hints for only one directory. However, in my particular case it seems that my blunder of running ldconfig -v (and not ldconfig by itself as I had assumed - my bad) is sufficient to render it impossible to log in as my regular user account since I had set my default login shell to bash. That, in conjunction with root being disallowed by default in sshd effectively locked me out of my machine once I closed my only open ssh session. Modifying my original suggestion slightly, is there any reason why it would be a bad thing for ldconfig to assume -r when either -v with no other arguments (or no arguments at all) is passed to ldconfig or is there some specific reason for the current behavior? Regards, Shelby Cain ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ldconfig I don't like it very much
Running ldconfig with no arguments is a death sentence for Free BSD. I believe the default should be to rebuilt the hints based on the system files. It seems like if you run ldconfig with no arguments it wipes all the hints. Since root uses bash as a shell I can not find a way to login and fix this. even the console has the problem You have mail. /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libintl.so.6 not found, required by -bash Will a reboot cure this or do i have to go single user? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ldconfig I don't like it very much
Reboot handled it , the commands you mentioned are effectively ran on reboot. On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 3:13 PM, Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You have mail. /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libintl.so.6 not found, required by -bash Will a reboot cure this or do i have to go single user? probably the latter. do /etc/rc.d/abi start ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Large file system creation
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 9:38 AM, Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all. I'm trying to create a ~9TB partition on a new file server. I thought FreeBSD now supported this (I'm on 7.0), but I can't figure it out. I go into sysinstall, create the partition in fdisk using A = Use Entire Disk), write it to disk, exit sysinstall and re-run it...and sysinstall doesn't show what it showed before I exited last time. Can someone shed some light on what I'm doing wrong here? The filesystem (UFS2) supports disks larger than 2TB, but fdisk(8) and bsdlabel(8) (which are what sysinstall uses to partition the disk) do not support disks larger than 2TB due to limitations in the on-disk format they use. You will need to use gpt(8) instead to partition your disk. or don't partition at all This cannot be done from sysinstall and you normally cannot boot from a gpt(8)-partitioned disk due to lack of support in the BIOS of most PC. or use old disk, pendrive, DVD-ROM etc. for booting ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Seems like a shame to boot a nice 9TB disk pack off a floppy Disk or a Pen drive. I mean you do what you have to but that just screams 'workaround' ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Why are some linux users saying that FreeBSD is dying
It would be helpful if you provided a URL for the article. I do not think they mean that FreeBSD systems are dying in terms of crashing or uptime. They might mean that the Free BSD community is not growing as fast or staying as active as the Linux community. On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 5:45 PM, Pollywog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tuesday 08 April 2008 21:32:01 E. J. Cerejo wrote: FreeBSD is a dying OS because netcraft.com confirms it that's the argument used some of these guys, and I'm wondering what data are they using to make their point! Even netcraft is running FreeBSD and the uptimes section I can see quite a few running FreeBSD and not one linux! Is the data from netcraft reliable? I think perhaps the Linux users who say those things are just trying to get people to use Linux, for political reasons and not because Linux is necessarily better. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: making FreeBSD phone home via SSH
I believe the stunnel application is made to manager and restart tunnels like this. However stunnel is a wrapper application around reverse ssh tunnels, which someone has already mentioned. You may want to run your ssh server on tcp https 443. Because some firewalls will block outgoing things. SSH server on 443 looks like a secured web site to almost all packet inspecting engines. On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Paul A. Procacci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Elliot Finley wrote: Hello all, I have an interesting project. I have several FreeBSD servers that I will be deploying to remote locations. They will be sitting behind a NAT. I would like them to make a SSH connection to a local server sitting on a public IP. I need them connected in a way that will give me remote shell access. Has anyone done this before? I'd rather not re-invent the wheel. TIA for any pointers. Elliot ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I've been using vtund for just that. Simple, easy, effectivejust another option of course. ~Paul ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: my brother is making me learn FreeBSD...
For a kick, tell you brother that free BSD is no good. Install linux on the server and start your own consulting company! I mean seriously! 14 replies to a thread about nothing. Let it die everyone! On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 3:32 AM, Donald Laniohan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My task is to build a BSD server and do something with it. That is all the information he gave me, that, and any questions I have to make Google my best friend, which I have. i remember building my first whitebox, it was a 386 with windows 3.1. I remember when I built my 486 and stole a copy of windows 95. I thought I was a savage. BSD, however, has showed me how juvenile I have been. If I do not master BSD my brother is going to keep me as a desktop support for his windows clients and I want to progress past this. So he's giving me a 1u, and said to put BSD on it and make it do something, im just so stuck in my windows comfort zone I can't think of what I would need a unix server to that I couldn't make windows do for me. I know this is trivial but if somebody could offer any suggestion or resource I, and my career, would greatly appreciate it Donald Laniohan MLAN Consulting San Diego, CA [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]