Anyone have any luck with DL145 G3 and 7.0

2008-04-16 Thread Edward Capriolo
6.2 detects  SATA disks 7.0 does not. Some docs suggest BIOS updates.
Does anyone know why device support would drop from 7.0?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Invoking ldconfig without arguments wipes all hints and makes me very sad

2008-04-10 Thread Edward Capriolo
I just wrote to the list about the SAME thing. I totally agree. This
is like the
saying 'rm' command without arguments will delete every file on your
computer. I did the same thing. I wish it was a virtual system I did
it to as well :)

On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Shelby Cain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Greetings list.  I'm a new user to FreeBSD and I just managed to
  introduce myself to ldconfig's default behavior.  I'm currently locked
  out of my remote server since bash isn't statically compiled and will
  have to get physical access to correct my blunder.  :(

  As a new user to FreeBSD, ldconfig's default behavior makes about as
  much sense to me as rm adding -fr ~ or kill adding -9 1 in the
  absence of arguments.  I hate to sound ignorant but I have to ask, is
  there any particular reason FreeBSD's ldconfig defaults to this
  seemingly unintuitive and non-newbie-safe behavior?

  Would a patch that changes the behavior of ldconfig to assume -r in the
  absence of command line arguments and adds a new parameter like
  -e[rase]|-d[estroy]|-w[ipe]|-z[ap]|-l[olnewbie] to enable the original
  behavior be likely to gain any acceptance?

  Regards,

  Shelby Cain

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Invoking ldconfig without arguments wipes all hints and makes me very sad

2008-04-10 Thread Edward Capriolo
The command

ldconfig -v

Wipes your hints without saying a thing about it. I would not call
that verbose. If you want to know what I think it should output I
suggest.

ldconfig -v
Number of paths specified 0
News Hints Size: 0



On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Shelby Cain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 23:09 +0200, Mel wrote:
  
   First of all, running ldconfig without arguments does nothing bad. Running
   ldconfig without flags and with arguments does.
  
   Secondly, what is the command:
   ldconfig /usr/lib
  
   supposed to do, according to newbie friendly logic?
   Because it should be possible to just have the linker create hints for one
   directory.
  

  Your example seems perfectly reasonable should one wish to create hints
  for only one directory.

  However, in my particular case it seems that my blunder of running
  ldconfig -v (and not ldconfig by itself as I had assumed - my bad) is
  sufficient to render it impossible to log in as my regular user account
  since I had set my default login shell to bash.  That, in conjunction
  with root being disallowed by default in sshd effectively locked me out
  of my machine once I closed my only open ssh session.

  Modifying my original suggestion slightly, is there any reason why it
  would be a bad thing for ldconfig to assume -r when either -v with no
  other arguments (or no arguments at all) is passed to ldconfig or is
  there some specific reason for the current behavior?

  Regards,

  Shelby Cain

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


ldconfig I don't like it very much

2008-04-09 Thread Edward Capriolo
Running ldconfig with no arguments is a death sentence for Free BSD. I
believe the default should be to rebuilt the hints based on the system
files. It seems like if you run ldconfig with no arguments it wipes
all the hints. Since root uses bash as a shell I can not find a way to
login and fix this. even the console has the problem

You have mail.
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libintl.so.6 not found, required
by -bash

Will a reboot cure this or do i have to go single user?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: ldconfig I don't like it very much

2008-04-09 Thread Edward Capriolo
Reboot handled it , the commands you mentioned are effectively ran on reboot.

On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 3:13 PM, Wojciech Puchar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  You have mail.
  /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libintl.so.6 not found, required
  by -bash
 
  Will a reboot cure this or do i have to go single user?
 

  probably the latter.

  do

  /etc/rc.d/abi start
  ___
  freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
  http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
  To unsubscribe, send any mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Large file system creation

2008-04-08 Thread Edward Capriolo
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 9:38 AM, Wojciech Puchar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
   Hi all.  I'm trying to create a ~9TB partition on a new file server.
   I thought FreeBSD now supported this (I'm on 7.0), but I can't figure
   it out.  I go into sysinstall, create the partition in fdisk using A
   = Use Entire Disk), write it to disk, exit sysinstall and re-run
   it...and sysinstall doesn't show what it showed before I exited last
   time.
  
   Can someone shed some light on what I'm doing wrong here?
  
  
 
  The filesystem (UFS2) supports disks larger than 2TB, but fdisk(8) and
  bsdlabel(8) (which are what sysinstall uses to partition the disk) do not
  support disks larger than 2TB due to limitations in the on-disk format
 they
  use.
 
  You will need to use gpt(8) instead to partition your disk.
 

  or don't partition at all




  This cannot be done from sysinstall and you normally cannot boot from
  a gpt(8)-partitioned disk due to lack of support in the BIOS of most PC.
 

  or use old disk, pendrive, DVD-ROM etc. for booting


  ___
  freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
  http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
  To unsubscribe, send any mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Seems like a shame to boot a nice 9TB disk pack off a floppy Disk or a
Pen drive. I mean you do what you have to but that just screams
'workaround'
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Why are some linux users saying that FreeBSD is dying

2008-04-08 Thread Edward Capriolo
It would be helpful if you provided a  URL for the article. I do not
think they mean that FreeBSD systems are dying in terms of crashing or
uptime. They might mean that the Free BSD community is not growing as
fast or staying as active as the Linux community.

On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 5:45 PM, Pollywog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Tuesday 08 April 2008 21:32:01 E. J. Cerejo wrote:
   FreeBSD is a dying OS because netcraft.com confirms it that's the
   argument used some of these guys, and I'm wondering what data are they
   using to make their point!  Even netcraft is running FreeBSD and the
   uptimes section I can see quite a few running FreeBSD and not one linux!
   Is the data from netcraft reliable?

  I think perhaps the Linux users who say those things are just trying to get
  people to use Linux, for political reasons and not because Linux is
  necessarily better.


 ___
  freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
  http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
  To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: making FreeBSD phone home via SSH

2008-03-26 Thread Edward Capriolo
I believe the stunnel application is made to manager and restart
tunnels like this. However stunnel is a wrapper application around
reverse ssh tunnels, which someone has already mentioned.

You may want to run your ssh server on tcp https 443. Because some
firewalls will block outgoing things. SSH server on 443 looks like a
secured web site to almost all packet inspecting engines.

On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Paul A. Procacci
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Elliot Finley wrote:
   Hello all,
  
   I have an interesting project.  I have several FreeBSD servers that I
   will be deploying to remote locations.  They will be sitting behind a
   NAT.  I would like them to make a SSH connection to a local server
   sitting on a public IP.  I need them connected in a way that will give
   me remote shell access.
  
   Has anyone done this before?  I'd rather not re-invent the wheel.
  
   TIA for any pointers.
  
   Elliot
   ___
   freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
   http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
   To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  I've been using vtund for just that.  Simple, easy, effectivejust
  another option of course.

  ~Paul


 ___
  freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
  http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
  To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: my brother is making me learn FreeBSD...

2008-03-20 Thread Edward Capriolo
For a kick, tell you brother that free BSD is no good. Install linux
on the server and start your own consulting company!

I mean seriously! 14 replies to a thread about nothing. Let it die everyone!

On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 3:32 AM, Donald Laniohan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 My task is to build a BSD server and do something with it. That is all the
  information he gave me, that, and any questions I have to make Google my
  best friend, which I have. i remember building my first whitebox, it was a
  386 with windows 3.1. I remember when I built my 486 and stole a copy of
  windows 95. I thought I was a savage. BSD, however, has showed me how
  juvenile I have been. If I do not master BSD my brother is going to keep me
  as a desktop support for his windows clients and I want to progress past
  this. So he's giving me a 1u, and said to put BSD on it and make it do
  something, im just so stuck in my windows comfort zone I can't think of what
  I would need a unix server to that I couldn't make windows do for me. I know
  this is trivial but if somebody could offer any suggestion or resource I,
  and my career, would greatly appreciate it



  Donald Laniohan

  MLAN Consulting

  San Diego, CA

  [EMAIL PROTECTED]



  ___
  freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
  http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
  To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]