Re: security log entry
Hello, I've seen similar garbage (on the screen however) and options PRINTF_BUFR_SIZE=128 solved the problem, maybe this will help you somehow. On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Jerry freebsd.u...@seibercom.net wrote: From time to time, I will find an entry similar to the follow in the /var/log/security log: Sep 12 07:23:59 scorpio kernel: ipfw:1 103i6pf0w0: A36c0c0e ptA cUcDePp t1 92U.D1P6 81.912..11061:81.510.5150 12:2145.005.50 .222541.:05.305.32 5o1u:t5 3v5i3a innf ev0i I have IPFW configured as my firewall. I am not sure exactly what is commencing when that above log entry is created. Apparently, or at least as far as I can tell, nothing is being effected. I was just wondering if anyone had any idea what it might be pertaining to. -- Jerry ✌ freebsd.u...@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __ -- Grzegorz Danecki ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
gmirror on different disks
Hello everybody! I'm just wondering, I had gmirror with two disks: Master: ad0 ST3160815AS/4.AAB Serial ATA II Master: ad2 ST3160815AS/4.AAB Serial ATA II unfortunately ad0 failed today, leaving me with degraded array and ad0 offline. I did # gmirror forget gm0, then shutdown, ad0 was replaced with: ad0: 152626MB Seagate ST3160815AS 3.AAD at ata0-master SATA300 with different firmware I think. Then gmirror insert gm0 /dev/ad0 (...) Jul 31 09:55:46 julia kernel: GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm0: rebuilding provider ad0 finished. Jul 31 09:55:46 julia kernel: GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm0: provider ad0 activated. But the disk is a little bit smaller: 1. Name: mirror/gm0 Mediasize: 160040803328 (149G) Sectorsize: 512 Mode: r5w5e6 Consumers: 1. Name: ad2 Mediasize: 160041885696 (149G) Sectorsize: 512 Mode: r1w1e1 State: ACTIVE Priority: 0 Flags: DIRTY GenID: 1 SyncID: 1 ID: 3791030614 2. Name: ad0 Mediasize: 160040803840 (149G) Sectorsize: 512 Mode: r1w1e1 State: ACTIVE Priority: 0 Flags: DIRTY GenID: 1 SyncID: 1 ID: 2477089776 # gmirror status NameStatus Components mirror/gm0 COMPLETE ad2 ad0 so, it looks fine. Can I expect any problems now because of different sizes? Any problems when RAID will be almost full? I mean - should I make the RAID once again with exactly the same drives, or can I leave it as it is right now? Thanks in advance! -- Grzegorz Danecki ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
gmake upgrade
Hello list! it may be a stupid question, but i'm a little bit scared before gmake upgrade. I'm not using portupgrade, everything is build from the ports tree, so, when some package is old, and there is newer version in ports, then make all make deinstall make install make clean. It works pretty fine for now. But what about gmake? Will I be able to compile new gmake sources when I'll do `make deinstall in /usr/ports/devel/gmake` first? Few details: pkg_version | grep gmake pkg_info | grep gmake gmake-3.80_2GNU version of 'make' utility the latest version in my ports tree is make-3.81 The system is FreeBSD 6.1 Release with latest patches it can be a problem like chmod -x /bin/chmod, but maybe You have an idea? TIA, thanks also for Your great job and merry x-mas! :) -- Vlad ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
screen alternative
Hi List! I'm running 5.4 Stable and I'm looking for something, that can let me detach my session leaving my software running. First thought - screen, but hey, there is no screen package in ports collection :( Google says something that it was removed due to high cpu utilization few releases ago. Is this true? Are there any alternatives? Because as I can remember screen was frequently used and highly appreciated application. Or should I rather look for some sources instead of package? Any problems with that? Many thanks in advance, You are doing great work here! Greg Danecki ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
