Re: mini iso's

2002-09-22 Thread Joshua Lee

On Sat, 21 Sep 2002 00:44:18 +0200
Socketd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  4.7-RC (4.7 release candidate 1) already has a mini-iso, in fact it
  doesn't offer any other kind of iso yet, though I suspect the
  release itself will offer all kinds of isos.
 
 ups, I also meant 4.7-Release.

I don't know what 4.7-RELEASE contains as I'm not a 4.7-RELEASE
engineer, and if I was I don't think I'd be telling you. ;-) Listen, if
worst comes to worst and there somehow isn't a 4.7 mini-iso, you could
CVSup your existing system to the 4.7 release or -STABLE without using
much bandwidth. (See the handbook under keeping up to date.)

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message



Re: mini iso's

2002-09-20 Thread Joshua Lee

On Fri, 20 Sep 2002 00:01:06 +0200
Socketd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I have noticed that there isn't a mini iso for 4.6.2, why?

It's a bugfix release that requires 4.6 installed, even the regular isos
on the ftp server need 4.6 to work. (I think Daemon News offers a specially built 
complete 4.6.2 set however.)

 Will there be one for 4.7? (I really hope so).

4.7-RC (4.7 release candidate 1) already has a mini-iso, in fact it
doesn't offer any other kind of iso yet, though I suspect the release
itself will offer all kinds of isos.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message



Re: FreeBSD 4.6 Modems

2002-07-16 Thread Joshua Lee

On Mon, 15 Jul 2002 07:27:01 +0100
Matthew Seaman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  with no fuss. It also lives on IRQ 9 here; that can cause conflicts,
  at least here where I'm trying to resolve a conflict between it and
  the second built-in USB hub on my computer. Other than that it's a
 
 That's a plug'n'play modem isn't it? If you make yourself a custom
 kernel config where you comment out the sio2 and sio3 device lines
 (which are disabled by default), then your internal modem will be
 assigned to sio2 (/dev/cuaa2) on the IO_COM3 port and irq 5.

Thanks. Someone else wrote me with a solution for the root cause of it though; 
apparantly the kernel assumes that a serial port (or serial-port emulating device like 
a PCI modem) cannot share IRQs. A one-line modification of the source fixes this, and 
now my USB bus and the device on it is detected according to the boot messages. 

I'm still having problems getting my printer to work though; instead of saying that 
the device doesn't exist it says /dev/ulpt0 and /dev/unlpt0 are busy in aspfilter's 
setup and also if I redirect text directly to the device on the command line.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message



Re: FreeBSD 4.6 Modems

2002-07-14 Thread Joshua Lee

On Fri, 12 Jul 2002 20:53:57 -0700
Ios Phere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I am looking for an internal modem to use with my FreeBSD 4.6 install,  my current 
Rockwell Chipset modem appears not to respond to PPP.
 
 Was woundering if anyone could recommend known working internal (56k) 
 modems that you like?

I use a USR Robotics Performance Pro modem. I'm satisfied with it, but it's port 
assignment (the equivalent of COM5; /dev/cuaa4) is kind of odd, though BSD detects it 
during setup and uses PPP with it with no fuss. It also lives on IRQ 9 here; that can 
cause conflicts, at least here where I'm trying to resolve a conflict between it and 
the second built-in USB hub on my computer. Other than that it's a great modem. 

If you have the deskspace and a little extra cash I'd reccomend an external modem - 
they are much less likely to cause a motherboard to fry in the event of a power surge 
and can be used on many architectures as well as being handier to provide instant 
dial-up internet connectivity on another computer when needed.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message