Problem with vlans on igb (was: fsck problem FreeBSD 8.3)
Пересылаемое сообщение 11.04.2012, 13:14, "KES" : 10.04.2012, 08:50, "Da Rock" : > On 04/10/12 05:02, Коньков Евгений wrote: >> Yes, I have tested. >> and on this hardware on this OS it works from Fri Feb 24 17:07:48 UTC 2012 >> but last two days: >> reboot ~ Mon Apr 9 19:50 >> reboot ~ Mon Apr 9 18:30 >> reboot ~ Sun Apr 8 20:55 >> reboot ~ Sun Apr 8 20:00 >> reboot ~ Sun Apr 8 19:49 >> reboot ~ Sun Apr 8 17:43 >> reboot ~ Sun Apr 8 10:58 >> reboot ~ Sat Apr 7 21:13 >> reboot ~ Sat Apr 7 16:37 >> reboot ~ Sat Apr 7 16:07 >> >> I remembered. One thing changed. >> I add vlans to igb2, but no traffic flow on that devices yet. > Perhaps you should test removing the vlans and see if things improve? I have removed vlans, two day server works without reboots >> Before this I have use: igb0, igb1, igb3 >> igb0@pci0:1:0:0: class=0x02 card=0x00018086 chip=0x15218086 >> rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 >> vendor = 'Intel Corporation' >> class = network >> subclass = ethernet >> igb1@pci0:1:0:1: class=0x02 card=0x00018086 chip=0x15218086 >> rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 >> vendor = 'Intel Corporation' >> class = network >> subclass = ethernet >> igb2@pci0:1:0:2: class=0x02 card=0x00018086 chip=0x15218086 >> rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 >> vendor = 'Intel Corporation' >> class = network >> subclass = ethernet >> igb3@pci0:1:0:3: class=0x02 card=0x00018086 chip=0x15218086 >> rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 >> vendor = 'Intel Corporation' >> class = network >> subclass = ethernet >> >> ifconfig_vlan100="inet 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 vlan 100 vlandev >> igb2" #nALL >> ifconfig_vlan101="inet 192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 vlan 101 vlandev >> igb2" #n2 p24 >> ifconfig_vlan102="inet 192.168.2.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 vlan 102 vlandev >> igb2" #n1 p23 >> ifconfig_vlan103="inet 192.168.3.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 vlan 103 vlandev >> igb2" #n3 p22 >> ifconfig_vlan104="inet 192.168.4.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 vlan 104 vlandev >> igb2" #n7,9 p21 >> ifconfig_vlan105="inet 192.168.5.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 vlan 105 vlandev >> igb2" #n11 p20 >> ifconfig_vlan106="inet 192.168.6.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 vlan 106 vlandev >> igb2" #n13 p19 >> ifconfig_vlan107="inet 192.168.7.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 vlan 107 vlandev >> igb2" #n223 p18 >> ifconfig_vlan108="inet 192.168.8.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 vlan 108 vlandev >> igb2" #n225 p17 >> ifconfig_vlan109="inet 192.168.9.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 vlan 109 vlandev >> igb2" #n221 p16 >> ifconfig_vlan110="inet 192.168.10.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 vlan 110 vlandev >> igb2" #n229 p15 >> ifconfig_vlan111="inet 192.168.11.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 vlan 111 vlandev >> igb2" #n233 p14 >> ifconfig_vlan112="inet 192.168.12.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 vlan 112 vlandev >> igb2" #n231 p13 >> ifconfig_vlan113="inet 192.168.13.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 vlan 113 vlandev >> igb2" #n237 p12 >> ifconfig_vlan114="inet 192.168.14.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 vlan 114 vlandev >> igb2" #n424 p11 >> ifconfig_vlan115="inet 192.168.15.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 vlan 115 vlandev >> igb2" # >> >> PAP> Nothing logged in /var/log/* or crashes that exist in /var/crash >> PAP> would indicate to me some sort of hardware related problem. >> PAP> Have you tested your hardware lately and know that it is in >> operational order? >> >> PAP> ~Paul >> >> PAP> On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 09:36:54PM +0300, ??? ??? wrote: >>>> Hi. >>>> >>>> Apr 9 19:51:58 fsck: /dev/ad8s1e: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY, CANNOT RUN >>>> FAST FSCK >>>> Apr 9 19:51:58 fsck: >>>> Apr 9 19:51:58 fsck: >>>> Apr 9 19:51:58 fsck: /dev/ad8s1e: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY
ipfw FreeBSD 10
building kernel with this options: options IPFIREWALL #enable ipfw options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE #enable log options IPFIREWALL_FORWARD #enable fwd options IPDIVERT options LIBALIAS options IPFIREWALL_NAT #enable nat do not enable IPFW When doing ipfw show it shows 000 93874234 23402394820384 any to any and stops ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
vmcore
I am have vmcore files but kernel has compiled without -g can I take any usefull information about 'why this problem occour'? cat info.0 info.1 info.2 Dump header from device /dev/ad0s1b Architecture: i386 Architecture Version: 2 Dump Length: 380215296B (362 MB) Blocksize: 512 Dumptime: Wed Dec 28 14:17:48 2011 Hostname: flux Magic: FreeBSD Kernel Dump Version String: FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #4: Fri Jun 10 01:30:12 UTC 2011 @:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PAE_KES Panic String: double fault Dump Parity: 435437143 Bounds: 2 Dump Status: good Dump header from device /dev/ad0s1b Architecture: i386 Architecture Version: 2 Dump Length: 493899776B (471 MB) Blocksize: 512 Dumptime: Wed Dec 7 17:56:01 2011 Hostname: flux Magic: FreeBSD Kernel Dump Version String: FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #4: Fri Jun 10 01:30:12 UTC 2011 @:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PAE_KES Panic String: double fault Dump Parity: 2760491868 Bounds: 1 Dump Status: good Dump header from device /dev/ad0s1b Architecture: i386 Architecture Version: 2 Dump Length: 449695744B (428 MB) Blocksize: 512 Dumptime: Sat Nov 12 14:54:01 2011 Hostname: flux Magic: FreeBSD Kernel Dump Version String: FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #4: Fri Jun 10 01:30:12 UTC 2011 @:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PAE_KES Panic String: double fault Dump Parity: 2619940699 Bounds: 0 Dump Status: good ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
problems with IRQ
system work fine, but systat -v show wrong results in compare with vmstat -i seems counter overflow or so.. systat -v 2 usersLoad 0.95 1.13 1.15 Oct 6 17:36 Mem:KBREALVIRTUAL VN PAGER SWAP PAGER Tot Share TotShareFree in out in out Act 3425966396 813716 9244 1395872 count All 527128 10356 300289639336 pages Proc:Interrupts r p d s w Csw Trp Sys Int Sof Flt 31 cow254k total 50 557k 2614 14k 237k 4028 449127 zfodatkbd0 1 2 ozfod12 ata0 14 9.1%Sys 21.7%Intr 1.6%User 0.0%Nice 67.6%Idle 1%ozfod 221k ehci0 16 ||||||||||| daefr 2 ehci1 23 =++> 37 prcfr 4130 cpu0:timer 42 dtbuf 314 totfr 15799 re0 256 Namei Name-cache Dir-cache142271 desvn react 4131 cpu1:timer Callshits %hits % 87941 numvn pdwak 4129 cpu3:timer 61585762 94 35563 frevn pdpgs 4130 cpu2:timer intrn Disks ad0 da0 pass0298480 wire KB/t 18.79 0.00 0.00193600 act tps 12 0 0 2103500 inact MB/s 0.22 0.00 0.00 9180 cache %busy 0 0 0 1386692 free # vmstat -i interrupt total rate irq1: atkbd02536 0 irq14: ata0 8516926 9 irq16: ehci0 2233740154 2585 irq23: ehci1 2594742 3 cpu0:timer3562265448 4122 irq256: re0 2291967374 2652 cpu1:timer3562481709 4123 cpu3:timer3479157511 4026 cpu2:timer3555645238 4115 Total18696371638 21638 thank you. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re[2]: IPFW missing feature
Здравствуйте, Lowell. Вы писали 16 апреля 2009 г., 15:22:31: LG> KES writes: >> The tablearg feature provides the ability to use a value, looked up in >> the table, as the argument for a rule action, action parameter or rule >> option. This can significantly reduce number of rules in some >> configura- >> tions. If two tables are used in a rule, the result of the second (des- >> tination) is used. The tablearg argument can be used with the following >> actions: nat, pipe, queue, divert, tee, netgraph, ngtee, fwd, skipto >> action parameters: tag, untag, rule options: limit, tagged. >> >> >> Why tablearg cannot be used with setfib? LG> Because tables are a feature of IPFW, and the FIB isn't. setfib is also feature of ipfw. see man: setfib fibnum The packet is tagged so as to use the FIB (routing table) fibnum in any subsequent forwarding decisions. Initially this is limited to the values 0 through 15. See setfib(8). Processing continues at the next rule. There is no any difficulties to use 'tablearg' as 'fibnum' ipfw add 3 setfib 2 all from 192.168.0.0/16 to any in recv ipfw add 3 setfib tablearg all from table() to any in recv but now this is not mistake to write 'setfib tablearg'. IPFW just replace tablearg in rule with 0 It seems like a bug. because of it MUST work in proper way or DO NOT work at all. IMHO -- С уважением, KES mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re[2]: How to check which FIB has a given process
Здравствуйте, Anton. Вы писали 16 апреля 2009 г., 15:19:43: AY> On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 20:04:38 +0300, KES wrote: K>> Hi, Freebsd-questions. K>> K>> I can set process to have some FIB K>> setfib X /some/programm K>> K>> How to check which FIB has some process? K>> AY> It is not easy, but possible via kgdb. AY> under root run: AY> cd /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC AY> (if you use custom kernel replace GENERIC by kernel name) AY> make gdbinit AY> kgdb kernel.debug /dev/mem AY> (kgdb) ps AY> find interesting process, than copy proc address (2-nd column) AY> (kgdb) set $pp = (struct proc*) 0xff000fff3000 AY> And see FIB for this process: AY> (kgdb) p $pp.p_fibnum AY> $1 = 0x0 It is really not easy. I expected something like: checkfib =) Thank you for answer -- С уважением, KES mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
IPFW missing feature
Здравствуйте, Freebsd-questions. The tablearg feature provides the ability to use a value, looked up in the table, as the argument for a rule action, action parameter or rule option. This can significantly reduce number of rules in some configura- tions. If two tables are used in a rule, the result of the second (des- tination) is used. The tablearg argument can be used with the following actions: nat, pipe, queue, divert, tee, netgraph, ngtee, fwd, skipto action parameters: tag, untag, rule options: limit, tagged. Why tablearg cannot be used with setfib? -- С уважением, KES mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
IPFW, KERNEL, sysctl: has no effect changing DUMMYNET.io_fast
Hi, Freebsd-questions. This change sysctl net.inet.ip.dummynet.io_fast=1 has no effect for packet flow, bug man says: Fast mode allows certain packets to bypass dummynet scheduler if packet flow does not exceed pipe's bandwidth flow does not exceed pipe limit, but packet flow latency is affected ipfw pipe 1 config bw 64kbit/s ipfw add 1 pipe 1 all from any to any No any trafic except ping: ping some.lan.machine with rules above ping is about 8ms, without them <1ms Does I understand corrent "Fast mode" when I ping I do flow less than 64Kbit/s so packet must bypass scheduler and must have latency <1ms? -- С уважением, KES mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
How to check which FIB has a given process
Hi, Freebsd-questions. I can set process to have some FIB setfib X /some/programm How to check which FIB has some process? -- С уважением, KES mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
IPFW: table approvement
Hi. Is it right place to post ideas? If it is lets suggest next approvement IPFW has 'table' command each table entry has some 'tablearg' There are situations when you need each entry has multiple values. For example: #NAT table 1 add 10.0.1.0/24 1 table 1 add 10.0.2.0/24 2 #PIPE table 2 add 10.0.1.0/24 3 table 2 add 10.0.2.0/24 4 #tag table 3 add 10.0.1.0/24 7 table 4 add 10.0.2.0/24 9 ipfw add XXX tag tablearg all from table(1) to any ipfw add XXX nat tablearg all from table(2) to any ipfw add XXX pipe tablearg all from table(3) to any I will be best if it can be optimized as next: table 1 add 10.0.1.0/24 1 3 7 table 1 add 10.0.2.0/24 2 4 9 #user can name columns as: table 1 columns nat pipe tag #1. compatibility: first column can be used as usual ipfw add XXX tag tablearg all from table(1) to any #2. you may use value from second column of table entry as: ipfw add XXX nat tablearg(2) all from table(1) to any #3. you may use value by name ipfw add XXX pipe tablearg(pipe) all from table(1) to any #4. finally it will be good to apply multiple commands to one rule: ipfw add XXX pipe tablearg(pipe) nat tablearg(2) tag tablearg all from table(1) to any What do you think? -- С уважением, KES mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re[5]: FreeBSD 7.1, routing tables, rc.conf
Здравствуйте, KES.
K> As I said it be handy to have:
K> apache_enable="YES"
K> apache_fib="1"
K> named_enable="YES"
K> named_fib="2"
K> etc
patch to allow to setup fib for service running from rc.conf
/etc/rc.conf
# setup the full command to run
#
+++_fib=
+++if [ "${name}_fib" ]; then
+++eval _fib=\$${name}_fib
+++_fib="/usr/sbin/setfib $_fib"
+++fi
echo "Starting ${name}."
if [ -n "$_chroot" ]; then
_doit="\
${_nice:+nice -n $_nice }\
chroot ${_user:+-u $_user }${_group:+-g $_group }${_groups:+-G $_groups }\
---$_chroot $command $rc_flags $command_args"
+++$_chroot $_fib $command $rc_flags $command_args"
else
_doit="\
${_chdir:+cd $_chdir && }\
--- $command $rc_flags $command_args"
+++ $_fib $command $rc_flags $command_args"
Вы писали 29 января 2009 г., 19:02:45:
K> Здравствуйте, Arjan.
K> Yes, it is possible to use 'setfib'. As I write:
AvdO>> Then I do manually:
AvdO>> setfib 0 route add default
AvdO>> setfib 1 route add default
K> Also to run services, I can edit /etc/rc.d scripts, but this is ugly,
K> very ugly.
K> As I said it be handy to have:
K> apache_enable="YES"
K> apache_fib="1"
K> named_enable="YES"
K> named_fib="2"
K> etc
K> Вы писали 29 января 2009 г., 18:33:53:
AvdO>> Funny, I wasn't aware of this new option in 7.1, hence my
AvdO>> question. From what I see some stuff is already modified to use
AvdO>> this new option (like ipfw), but others require the setfib
AvdO>> utility. I'm not sure if you can add routes directly from
AvdO>> rc.conf, but why not try 'setfib - route add xxx' ?
AvdO>> (http://www.freebsd.org/releases/7.1R/errata.html)
AvdO>> --
AvdO>> -Original Message-
AvdO>> From: KES [mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru]
AvdO>> Sent: donderdag 29 januari 2009 17:26
AvdO>> To: Arjan van der Oest
AvdO>> Cc: questi...@freebsd.org
AvdO>> Subject: Re[2]: FreeBSD 7.1, routing tables, rc.conf
AvdO>> Здравствуйте, Arjan.
AvdO>> I mean:
AvdO>> options ROUTETABLES=2
AvdO>> Then I do manually:
AvdO>> setfib 0 route add default
AvdO>> setfib 1 route add default
AvdO>> in rc.conf I can do for FIB0:
AvdO>> defaultrouter=""
AvdO>> How to do same thing for other routing tables?
AvdO>> I exepct next feature to exists:
AvdO>> defaultrouter_fib1=""
AvdO>>> What exactly do you mean with two routing tables?
AvdO>>> --
AvdO>>> Met vriendelijke groet / Kind Regards,
AvdO>>> Worldmax Operations B.V.
AvdO>>>
AvdO>>> Arjan van der Oest
AvdO>>> Network Design Engineer
AvdO>>>
AvdO>>> T.: +31 (0) 88 001 7912
AvdO>>> F.: +31 (0) 88 001 7902
AvdO>>> M.: +31 (0) 6 10 62 58 46
AvdO>>>
AvdO>>> GPG: https://keyserver.pgp.com/ (Key ID: 07286F78) fingerprint:
AvdO>>> 2E9F 3AE2 0A8B 7579 75A9 169F 5D9E 5312 0728 6F78
AvdO>>> -Original Message-
AvdO>>> From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
AvdO>>> [mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of KES
AvdO>>> Sent: donderdag 29 januari 2009 17:00
AvdO>>> To: questi...@freebsd.org
AvdO>>> Subject: FreeBSD 7.1, routing tables, rc.conf
AvdO>>> Здравствуйте, Questions.
AvdO>>> I have two routing tables.
AvdO>>> How to setup two default routes for each routing table in rc.conf?
--
С уважением,
KES mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
WIFI duplex link
Здравствуйте, Freebsd-questions. Is there analog in FreeBSD like Microtic Nstreme? -- С уважением, KES mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re[4]: FreeBSD 7.1, routing tables, rc.conf
Здравствуйте, Arjan. Yes, it is possible to use 'setfib'. As I write: AvdO> Then I do manually: AvdO> setfib 0 route add default AvdO> setfib 1 route add default Also to run services, I can edit /etc/rc.d scripts, but this is ugly, very ugly. As I said it be handy to have: apache_enable="YES" apache_fib="1" named_enable="YES" named_fib="2" etc Вы писали 29 января 2009 г., 18:33:53: AvdO> Funny, I wasn't aware of this new option in 7.1, hence my AvdO> question. From what I see some stuff is already modified to use AvdO> this new option (like ipfw), but others require the setfib AvdO> utility. I'm not sure if you can add routes directly from AvdO> rc.conf, but why not try 'setfib - route add xxx' ? AvdO> (http://www.freebsd.org/releases/7.1R/errata.html) AvdO> -- AvdO> -Original Message- AvdO> From: KES [mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru] AvdO> Sent: donderdag 29 januari 2009 17:26 AvdO> To: Arjan van der Oest AvdO> Cc: questi...@freebsd.org AvdO> Subject: Re[2]: FreeBSD 7.1, routing tables, rc.conf AvdO> Здравствуйте, Arjan. AvdO> I mean: AvdO> options ROUTETABLES=2 AvdO> Then I do manually: AvdO> setfib 0 route add default AvdO> setfib 1 route add default AvdO> in rc.conf I can do for FIB0: AvdO> defaultrouter="" AvdO> How to do same thing for other routing tables? AvdO> I exepct next feature to exists: AvdO> defaultrouter_fib1="" AvdO>> What exactly do you mean with two routing tables? AvdO>> -- AvdO>> Met vriendelijke groet / Kind Regards, AvdO>> Worldmax Operations B.V. AvdO>> AvdO>> Arjan van der Oest AvdO>> Network Design Engineer AvdO>> AvdO>> T.: +31 (0) 88 001 7912 AvdO>> F.: +31 (0) 88 001 7902 AvdO>> M.: +31 (0) 6 10 62 58 46 AvdO>> AvdO>> GPG: https://keyserver.pgp.com/ (Key ID: 07286F78) fingerprint: AvdO>> 2E9F 3AE2 0A8B 7579 75A9 169F 5D9E 5312 0728 6F78 AvdO>> -Original Message- AvdO>> From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org AvdO>> [mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of KES AvdO>> Sent: donderdag 29 januari 2009 17:00 AvdO>> To: questi...@freebsd.org AvdO>> Subject: FreeBSD 7.1, routing tables, rc.conf AvdO>> Здравствуйте, Questions. AvdO>> I have two routing tables. AvdO>> How to setup two default routes for each routing table in rc.conf? -- С уважением, KES mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re[3]: Can not set up two ADSL link to provider
Здравствуйте, KES. Вы писали 27 января 2009 г., 21:23:57: K> Здравствуйте, Chuck. K> Вы писали 27 января 2009 г., 1:57:10: CS>> On Jan 26, 2009, at 3:34 PM, KES wrote: >>> I can not setup two ADSL PPPoE Links to same provider. >>> Because of imposibility to setup route for second connection >>> First connection gets: >>> ng0: flags=88d1 >>> metric 0 mtu 1492 >>>inet 92.113.94.215 --> 195.5.5.203 netmask 0x >>> >>> Second can not be established because of: >>> Jan 27 01:27:55 kes mpd: [UKR_B4] IFACE: Add address >>> 92.113.94.249/32->195.5.5.203 to ng1 >>> Jan 27 01:27:55 kes mpd: [UKR_B4] IFACE: Adding IPv4 address to ng1 >>> failed: File exists CS>> You should talk to your network provider and ask them whether they CS>> want you to do multilink PPP or IEEE 802.3ad link aggregation. Either CS>> way, the bonding of the two connections should give you a single CS>> virtual network interface (tunX for the first, probably, and laggX in CS>> the second case) which has only a single route. CS>> For example: CS>> http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/erx/junose80/swconfig-physical/html/ethernet-config14.html CS>> ...talks about "After you configure the LAG bundle, you can route IP CS>> traffic over it, create a VLAN over it, or route PPPoE traffic over it." K> I do not want to aggregate links. I want use them as standalone K> I had two servers, two lans and two ADSLs. Now I have one server, four K> NICs: first LAN1, second LAN2, third ADSL1, forth ADSL2 K> I want to route LAN1 through ADSL1, LAN2 through ADSL2. LAN1/LAN2 must K> not interact with each other. For each LAN I use its own FIB (routing K> table). K> Only one problem: I can not run setup two PPPoE link if for second K> link is leased same gateway as for first K> So, is it possible to workaround this problem? In any case I is impossible to talk to my provider. It will change nothing. This is country wide provider. They said: "if you can not configure that on one machine then you must use two.. " Also NOTICE: when I setup second PPPoE connection I setfib 1 (second routing table). So route must be added to second routing table and must not conflict with first, but it does -- С уважением, KES mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re[3]: FreeBSD 7.1, routing tables, rc.conf
Здравствуйте, KES. far more. How to run services in order they use some routing tables? for example: I want that bind use FIB1 instead of FIB0 By default all programms use FIB0. It will be handy If it will possible to configure that in rc.conf like this: apache_enable="YES" apache_fib="1" named_enable="YES" named_fib="2" No matter why I need this. If FreeBSD has such major feature as multiple routing tables than this must be configureable. In this case, I think, in rc.conf Вы писали 29 января 2009 г., 18:25:53: K> Здравствуйте, Arjan. K> I mean: K> options ROUTETABLES=2 K> Then I do manually: K> setfib 0 route add default K> setfib 1 route add default K> in rc.conf I can do for FIB0: K> defaultrouter="" K> How to do same thing for other routing tables? K> I exepct next feature to exists: K> defaultrouter_fib1="" AvdO>> What exactly do you mean with two routing tables? AvdO>> -- AvdO>> Met vriendelijke groet / Kind Regards, AvdO>> Worldmax Operations B.V. AvdO>> AvdO>> Arjan van der Oest AvdO>> Network Design Engineer AvdO>> AvdO>> T.: +31 (0) 88 001 7912 AvdO>> F.: +31 (0) 88 001 7902 AvdO>> M.: +31 (0) 6 10 62 58 46 AvdO>> AvdO>> GPG: https://keyserver.pgp.com/ (Key ID: 07286F78) fingerprint: AvdO>> 2E9F 3AE2 0A8B 7579 75A9 169F 5D9E 5312 0728 6F78 AvdO>> -Original Message- AvdO>> From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org AvdO>> [mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of KES AvdO>> Sent: donderdag 29 januari 2009 17:00 AvdO>> To: questi...@freebsd.org AvdO>> Subject: FreeBSD 7.1, routing tables, rc.conf AvdO>> Здравствуйте, Questions. AvdO>> I have two routing tables. AvdO>> How to setup two default routes for each routing table in rc.conf? -- С уважением, KES mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re[2]: FreeBSD 7.1, routing tables, rc.conf
Здравствуйте, Arjan. I mean: options ROUTETABLES=2 Then I do manually: setfib 0 route add default setfib 1 route add default in rc.conf I can do for FIB0: defaultrouter="" How to do same thing for other routing tables? I exepct next feature to exists: defaultrouter_fib1="" AvdO> What exactly do you mean with two routing tables? AvdO> -- AvdO> Met vriendelijke groet / Kind Regards, AvdO> Worldmax Operations B.V. AvdO> AvdO> Arjan van der Oest AvdO> Network Design Engineer AvdO> AvdO> T.: +31 (0) 88 001 7912 AvdO> F.: +31 (0) 88 001 7902 AvdO> M.: +31 (0) 6 10 62 58 46 AvdO> AvdO> GPG: https://keyserver.pgp.com/ (Key ID: 07286F78) fingerprint: AvdO> 2E9F 3AE2 0A8B 7579 75A9 169F 5D9E 5312 0728 6F78 AvdO> -Original Message- AvdO> From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org AvdO> [mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of KES AvdO> Sent: donderdag 29 januari 2009 17:00 AvdO> To: questi...@freebsd.org AvdO> Subject: FreeBSD 7.1, routing tables, rc.conf AvdO> Здравствуйте, Questions. AvdO> I have two routing tables. AvdO> How to setup two default routes for each routing table in rc.conf? -- С уважением, KES mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
FreeBSD 7.1, routing tables, rc.conf
Здравствуйте, Questions. I have two routing tables. How to setup two default routes for each routing table in rc.conf? -- С уважением, KES mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re[3]: IPFW DUMMYNET: Several pipes after each other
Здравствуйте, Ian. Вы писали 28 января 2009 г., 18:01:45: IS> On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, KES wrote: >> , Ian. >> >> May be this will be usefull for you IS> Yes, but I need to read it more times :) Nicely answers the question IS> about stats per flow/queue anyway, not too hard to parse for logging. >> #1. ping -D -S 10.10.16.16 -s 1472 -i 0.01 10.0.16.1 >> #2. ping -S 10.10.16.17 10.0.16.1 IS> Results suggest that #1 was -S 10.10.16.19 ? A script running the same IS> number of #2 before killing #1 (or such) would make comparisons between IS> different runs easier to follow maybe? IS> Thanks, lots of useful info; hoping to try some weighted queueing soon. Yes, you are right -S 10.10.16.19. both ping are run simulteneously I have experimented with pipes after pipes. With dummy it is possible to do next: put two flows to pipe 512Kbit, pipe will be devided by equal parts: 256. in case the only one flow is active it will be 320Kbit pipe 1 bw 512kbit queue 1 pipe 1 pipe 2 bw 320kbit ipfw add 1 pipe 2 all from any to any ipfw add 2 queue 1 all from any to any First of all packets will be piped to 320Kbit/s then they will be queued to 512Kbit. Because of flow of 320 is less then 512kbit packets will leave queue with speed of 320. In case two flows both will be piped to 320 kbit in sum this will be 640kbit, Because of queue bw is 512kbit some packets will be droped. This will down each flow speed to 256 NOTICE: A) you must create its own pipe for each flow so you must use mask 0x. I use: pipe 1 config bw 512k mask src-ip 0x gred 0.002/10/30/0.1 pipe 2 config bw 320k mask src-ip 0x gred 0.002/10/30/0.1 B) you must put all flows to one queue so they share available bw so you must use mask 0x I use: queue 1 config pipe 1 mask src-ip 0x gred 0.002/10/30/0.1 keep in mind IPFW.man: In practice, pipes can be used to set hard limits to the bandwidth that a flow can use, whereas queues can be used to determine how different flow share the available bandwidth. So when you give user some bandwidth to user you must put its flow to pipe If users will share some bandwidth then put their flows to queue Suggestion: What queue inherit from pipe? It seems queue inherit only bandwidth parameter from pipe. If so then it is boring to create useless pipe to inherit only bw parameter. It will be handy directly write this parameter in queue and remove DEPRECATED (I think so) 'pipe' opts from queue. In any case this is "black box" how pipe is coupled with queue. This is unclear section in man. Also I notice next BUG: There are two modes of dummynet operation: normal and fast. Normal mode tries to emulate real link: dummynet scheduler ensures packet will not leave pipe faster than it would be on real link with given bandwidth. Fast mode allows certain packets to bypass dummynet scheduler (if packet flow does not exceed pipe's bandwidth). Thus fast mode requires less cpu cycles per packet (in average) but packet latency can be significantly lower comparing to real link with same bandwidth. Default is normal mode, fast mode can be enabled by setting net.inet.ip.dummynet.io_fast sysctl(8) variable to non-zero value. kes# ping 10.10.16.18 PING 10.10.16.18 (10.10.16.18): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 10.10.16.18: icmp_seq=0 ttl=128 time=18.441 ms 64 bytes from 10.10.16.18: icmp_seq=1 ttl=128 time=11.501 ms 64 bytes from 10.10.16.18: icmp_seq=2 ttl=128 time=11.516 ms 64 bytes from 10.10.16.18: icmp_seq=3 ttl=128 time=11.557 ms 64 bytes from 10.10.16.18: icmp_seq=4 ttl=128 time=11.534 ms ^C --- 10.10.16.18 ping statistics --- 5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 11.501/12.910/18.441/2.766 ms #ipfw pipe 1 show 1: 65.536 Kbit/s0 ms5 sl. 12 queues (64 buckets) GRED w_q 0.001999 min_th 10 max_th 30 max_p 0.01 mask: 0x00 0x/0x -> 0x/0x BKT Prot ___Source IP/port Dest. IP/port Tot_pkt/bytes Pkt/Byte Drp kes# ipfw add 1 pipe 1 all from 10.10.16.1 to 10.10.16.18 1 pipe 1 ip from 10.10.16.1 to 10.10.16.18 kes# ping -s 1472 10.10.16.18 PING 10.10.16.18 (10.10.16.18): 1472 data bytes 1480 bytes from 10.10.16.18: icmp_seq=0 ttl=128 time=192.354 ms 1480 bytes from 10.10.16.18: icmp_seq=1 ttl=128 time=184.393 ms 1480 bytes from 10.10.16.18: icmp_seq=2 ttl=128 time=184.614 ms 1480 bytes from 10.10.16.18: icmp_seq=3 ttl=128 time=184.217 ms 1480 bytes from 10.10.16.18: icmp_seq=4 ttl=128 time=184.402 ms ^C --- 10.10.16.18 ping statistics --- 5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 184.217/185.996/192.354/3.181 ms As I describe earlier: bw capability of this pipe is 8Kbytes/sec. It means 8Kb will be trasfered with timeout of 1sec. 1500bytes will be trasfered with timeout: 1500/
Re[2]: IPFW DUMMYNET: Several pipes after each other
cmp out xmit nfe0 #c add 11 queue 2 proto icmp in recv nfe0 #c queue 1 config mask src-ip 0x gred 0.002/10/30/0.1 #c queue 2 config mask dst-ip 0x gred 0.002/10/30/0.1 ### --- ### --- ### --- ### --- ### --- ### --- # 888 ### --- ### --- ### --- ### --- ### --- ### --- #Put flows to different queues #1 does not affect 2. #c add 10 queue 1 proto icmp out xmit nfe0 #c add 11 queue 2 proto icmp in recv nfe0 #c pipe 1 config mask src-ip 0x gred 0.002/10/30/0.1 #c pipe 2 config mask dst-ip 0x gred 0.002/10/30/0.1 #c queue 1 config pipe 1 mask src-ip 0x gred 0.002/10/30/0.1 #c queue 2 config pipe 2 mask dst-ip 0x gred 0.002/10/30/0.1 #1: unlimited0 ms 50 sl. 0 queues (64 buckets) # GRED w_q 0.001999 min_th 10 max_th 30 max_p 0.01 #2: unlimited0 ms 50 sl. 0 queues (64 buckets) # GRED w_q 0.001999 min_th 10 max_th 30 max_p 0.01 #q1: weight 1 pipe 1 50 sl. 2 queues (64 buckets) # GRED w_q 0.001999 min_th 10 max_th 30 max_p 0.01 #mask: 0x00 0x/0x -> 0x/0x #BKT Prot ___Source IP/port Dest. IP/port Tot_pkt/bytes Pkt/Byte Drp # 40 ip 10.10.16.17/0 0.0.0.0/0 39 3276 00 0 # 44 ip 10.10.16.19/0 0.0.0.0/0 3805 5707500 00 0 #q2: weight 1 pipe 2 50 sl. 2 queues (64 buckets) # GRED w_q 0.001999 min_th 10 max_th 30 max_p 0.01 #mask: 0x00 0x/0x -> 0x/0x #BKT Prot ___Source IP/port Dest. IP/port Tot_pkt/bytes Pkt/Byte Drp # 5 ip 0.0.0.0/0 10.10.16.17/0 27 2268 00 0 # 7 ip 0.0.0.0/0 10.10.16.19/0 3198 4797000 00 0 ### --- ### --- ### --- ### --- ### --- ### --- # 999 ### --- ### --- ### --- ### --- ### --- ### --- #Put flows to same queues #1 does not affect 2. EXPECTED: 1 affect 2. #Thoughts: 2 is not affected because of capability of device nfe0 #c add 10 queue 1 proto icmp out xmit nfe0 #c add 11 queue 2 proto icmp in recv nfe0 #c pipe 1 config mask src-ip 0x gred 0.002/10/30/0.1 #c pipe 2 config mask dst-ip 0x gred 0.002/10/30/0.1 #c queue 1 config pipe 1 mask src-ip 0x gred 0.002/10/30/0.1 #c queue 2 config pipe 2 mask dst-ip 0x00000000 gred 0.002/10/30/0.1 -- С уважением, KES mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re[2]: Can not set up two ADSL link to provider
Здравствуйте, Chuck. Вы писали 27 января 2009 г., 1:57:10: CS> On Jan 26, 2009, at 3:34 PM, KES wrote: >> I can not setup two ADSL PPPoE Links to same provider. >> Because of imposibility to setup route for second connection >> First connection gets: >> ng0: flags=88d1 >> metric 0 mtu 1492 >>inet 92.113.94.215 --> 195.5.5.203 netmask 0x >> >> Second can not be established because of: >> Jan 27 01:27:55 kes mpd: [UKR_B4] IFACE: Add address >> 92.113.94.249/32->195.5.5.203 to ng1 >> Jan 27 01:27:55 kes mpd: [UKR_B4] IFACE: Adding IPv4 address to ng1 >> failed: File exists CS> You should talk to your network provider and ask them whether they CS> want you to do multilink PPP or IEEE 802.3ad link aggregation. Either CS> way, the bonding of the two connections should give you a single CS> virtual network interface (tunX for the first, probably, and laggX in CS> the second case) which has only a single route. CS> For example: CS> http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/erx/junose80/swconfig-physical/html/ethernet-config14.html CS> ...talks about "After you configure the LAG bundle, you can route IP CS> traffic over it, create a VLAN over it, or route PPPoE traffic over it." I do not want to aggregate links. I want use them as standalone I had two servers, two lans and two ADSLs. Now I have one server, four NICs: first LAN1, second LAN2, third ADSL1, forth ADSL2 I want to route LAN1 through ADSL1, LAN2 through ADSL2. LAN1/LAN2 must not interact with each other. For each LAN I use its own FIB (routing table). Only one problem: I can not run setup two PPPoE link if for second link is leased same gateway as for first So, is it possible to workaround this problem? -- С уважением, KES mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re[2]: IPFW DUMMYNET: Several pipes after each other
Здравствуйте, Sebastian. Вы писали 26 января 2009 г., 12:16:18: SM> Ian Smith wrote: SM> On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:10:09 +0100 (CET) >> > >> > So far I've got those rules: >> > >> > in_if="em0" >> > out_if="em1" >> > management_if="em2" >> > in_ip="100.100.100.1" >> > out_ip="200.200.200.1" >> > management_ip="172.16.0.201" >> > client1_subnet="192.168.5.0/26" >> > client2_subnet="192.168.6.0/26" >> > server_subnet="192.168.7.0/24" >> > >> > download_bandwidth="6144Kbit/s" >> > upload_bandwidth="1024Kbit/s" >> > delay="0" >> > queue_size="10" >> >> 10 slots ie packets is likely too small a queue size at these rates. >> You want to check the dropped packet stats from 'ipfw pipe show' re >> that; see the section in ipfw(8) about calculating sizes / delays. >> SM> I had a look at the ipfw howto on the freebsd site [1], but I'm not 100% SM> sure how to choose a "good" value for the queue size. SM> If I choose the default (50 packets) it means that it takes approx. 100ms SM> (600kbits / 6144kbits) to fill the queue. SM> So the question is: Which value to choose for the queue? >> I suggest using 'in recv' and 'out xmit' rather than via for these, for >> the sake of clarity. 'in recv' and 'in via' come to the same thing, as >> only the receive interface is known on inbound packets, but 'out via' >> applies to packets that were *received* on the specified interface as >> well as those going out on that interface after routing, which can lead >> to surprising results sometimes, and being more specific never hurts .. SM> Thanks for the hint. SM> I'll change that. >> > But when I have a look at the pipes with 'ipfw show' I can only see >> > packets go through the pipe 50 and nothing goes through the other pipes >> > (which makes sense actually since IPFW work that way?). >> >> IPFW works that way if you (likely) have net.inet.ip.fw.one_pass=1 .. so >> that packets exiting from pipes aren't seen by the firewall again. If >> you set one_pass=0, packets are reinjected into the firewall at the rule >> following the pipe (or queue) action, which is what you want to do here. SM> Actually this is also described in the manpage of ipfw(8). SM> Shame on me ;-) >> And you'll surely need a much larger queue for this pipe, at 100Mbit/s. >> SM> As already asked above: SM> How do I know the queue is large or small enough for my needs? How calculate queue length for your link speed: suggest link speed is 64kbit/s = 8KB/s 50pkts in queue is 75000bytes (50*1500) ~73KB 73KB/8KB = 9sec so for bandwidth 64kbit you will have timeout 9000ms if queue is full. For example you want to have only 1000ms timeouts (ping) 1 * 8KB = 8KB. This max information transmited before queue will overflow for given timeout. 8Kb/1500= 5 -- value for your queue size For links with speed > 512Kbit your queue size 50 I use next values for queues: c pipe 1 config bw 65536bit/s queue 5 mask src-ip 0x gred 0.002/10/30/0.1 c pipe 2 config bw 65536bit/s queue 5 mask dst-ip 0x gred 0.002/10/30/0.1 c queue 1 config pipe 1 queue 5 mask src-ip 0x gred 0.002/10/30/0.1 c queue 2 config pipe 2 queue 5 mask dst-ip 0x gred 0.002/10/30/0.1 c pipe 3 config bw 131072bit/s mask src-ip 0x gred 0.002/10/30/0.1 c pipe 4 config bw 131072bit/s mask dst-ip 0x gred 0.002/10/30/0.1 c queue 3 config pipe 3 queue 10 mask src-ip 0x gred 0.002/10/30/0.1 c queue 4 config pipe 4 queue 10 mask dst-ip 0x gred 0.002/10/30/0.1 c pipe 5 config bw 262144bit/s mask src-ip 0x gred 0.002/10/30/0.1 c pipe 6 config bw 262144bit/s mask dst-ip 0x gred 0.002/10/30/0.1 c queue 5 config pipe 5 queue 20 mask src-ip 0x gred 0.002/10/30/0.1 c queue 6 config pipe 6 queue 20 mask dst-ip 0x gred 0.002/10/30/0.1 c pipe 7 config bw 524288bit/s mask src-ip 0x gred 0.002/10/30/0.1 c pipe 8 config bw 524288bit/s mask dst-ip 0x gred 0.002/10/30/0.1 c queue 7 config pipe 7 queue 40 mask src-ip 0x gred 0.002/10/30/0.1 c queue 8 config pipe 8 queue 40 mask dst-ip 0x gred 0.002/10/30/0.1 c pipe 9 config bw 1048576bit/s mask src-ip 0x gred 0.002/10/30/0.1 c pipe 10 config bw 1048576bit/s mask dst-ip 0x gred 0.002/10/30/0.1 c queue 9 config pipe 9 queue 50 mask src-ip 0x gred 0.002/10/30/0.1 c queue 10 config pipe 10 queue 50 mask dst-ip 0x gred 0.002/10/30/0.1 c pipe 11 config bw 2097152bit/s mask src-ip 0x gred 0.002/10/30/0.1 c pipe 12 config bw 2097152bit/s mask dst-ip 0x gred 0.002/10/30/0.1 c queue 11 config pipe 11 queue 50 mask src-ip 0x gred 0.002/10/30/0.1 c queue 12 config pipe 12 queue 50 mask dst-ip 0x gred 0.002/10/30/0.1 WARNING!!! you must use own queue/pipe for in/out traffic. In case you put in and out traffic to one pipe/queue you will simulate asyncrounous link!!! ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd
Can not set up two ADSL link to provider
Здравствуйте, Freebsd-questions. I can not setup two ADSL PPPoE Links to same provider. Because of imposibility to setup route for second connection First connection gets: ng0: flags=88d1 metric 0 mtu 1492 inet 92.113.94.215 --> 195.5.5.203 netmask 0x Second can not be established because of: Jan 27 01:27:55 kes mpd: [UKR_B4] IFACE: Add address 92.113.94.249/32->195.5.5.203 to ng1 Jan 27 01:27:55 kes mpd: [UKR_B4] IFACE: Adding IPv4 address to ng1 failed: File exists My suggestion is that that FreeBSD can not establish two ptp links with same gateway, cat it? please help to resolve problem -- С уважением, KES mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re[2]: 'top' shows wrong CPU usage
Здравствуйте, Lowell. Вы писали 21 января 2009 г., 23:01:30: LG> KES writes: >> top shows often nonsense in CPU usage of a process, but totals are OK >> and it seems that WCPU and CPU has no differences in results LG> Why do you think it's nonsense? It's averaged over a different time LG> period than the "CPU:" line in the header, so I wouldn't expect it to LG> match... When I gzip some big files I see that 0% idle, but I can not obtain from process list which process get all CPU. I top -S for WCPU and top -S -C for CPU. In both cases results are *useless*! >> top -S >> last pid: 66182; load averages: 2.51, 2.15, 2.03 up >> 10+23:40:14 22:05:41 >> 798 processes: 6 running, 772 sleeping, 1 zombie, 18 waiting, 1 lock >> CPU: 4.4% user, 0.0% nice, 14.8% system, 16.7% interrupt, 64.0% idle >> Mem: 264M Active, 60M Inact, 147M Wired, 6968K Cache, 60M Buf, 9888K Free >> Swap: 2048M Total, 1903M Used, 145M Free, 92% Inuse >> >> PID USERNAMETHR PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPU COMMAND >>11 root 1 171 ki31 0K 8K RUN104.1H 88.48% idle: cpu0 >> 66178 firebird 1 490 23120K 5828K select 0:00 1.37% >> fb_inet_server >> 66159 firebird 1 480 23120K 5760K select 0:01 1.17% >> fb_inet_server >> 5156 root 1 440 9024K 544K select 57:39 0.68% snmpd >> 66182 root 1 440 4556K 2608K RUN 0:00 0.68% top >> 66147 root 1 80 3124K 840K nanslp 0:00 0.59% monitord >> 66138 firebird 1 440 23120K 5736K select 0:01 0.49% >> fb_inet_server >> 75745 www 1 440 24628K 9500K select 5:05 0.29% python2.5 >> 66180 firebird 1 460 23120K 5852K select 0:00 0.10% >> fb_inet_server >> >> >> #top -S -C >> last pid: 66209; load averages: 2.13, 2.10, 2.02 up >> 10+23:41:07 22:06:34 >> 814 processes: 6 running, 788 sleeping, 1 zombie, 18 waiting, 1 lock >> CPU: 9.3% user, 0.0% nice, 13.4% system, 12.8% interrupt, 64.5% idle >> Mem: 269M Active, 56M Inact, 148M Wired, 12M Cache, 60M Buf, 3700K Free >> Swap: 2048M Total, 1903M Used, 145M Free, 92% Inuse >> >> PID USERNAMETHR PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIMECPU COMMAND >>11 root 1 171 ki31 0K 8K RUN104.1H 92.29% idle: cpu0 >> 66138 firebird 1 490 23120K 5556K select 0:01 1.46% >> fb_inet_server >> 66180 firebird 1 440 23120K 5612K select 0:01 0.59% >> fb_inet_server >> 66209 root 1 440 4556K 2556K RUN 0:00 0.59% top >> 66179 firebird 1 440 23120K 5624K select 0:01 0.49% >> fb_inet_server >> 5156 root 1 440 9024K 544K select 57:39 0.39% snmpd >> 66147 root 1 80 3124K 840K nanslp 0:01 0.39% monitord >> 66178 firebird 1 440 23120K 5584K select 0:01 0.20% >> fb_inet_server >>12 root 1 -44- 0K 8K WAIT 126.8H 0.00% swi1: net >>42 root 1 -68- 0K 8K - 219:53 0.00% dummynet -- С уважением, KES mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
'top' shows wrong CPU usage
Hello, Freebsd-questions. top shows often nonsense in CPU usage of a process, but totals are OK and it seems that WCPU and CPU has no differences in results top -S last pid: 66182; load averages: 2.51, 2.15, 2.03 up 10+23:40:14 22:05:41 798 processes: 6 running, 772 sleeping, 1 zombie, 18 waiting, 1 lock CPU: 4.4% user, 0.0% nice, 14.8% system, 16.7% interrupt, 64.0% idle Mem: 264M Active, 60M Inact, 147M Wired, 6968K Cache, 60M Buf, 9888K Free Swap: 2048M Total, 1903M Used, 145M Free, 92% Inuse PID USERNAMETHR PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPU COMMAND 11 root 1 171 ki31 0K 8K RUN104.1H 88.48% idle: cpu0 66178 firebird 1 490 23120K 5828K select 0:00 1.37% fb_inet_server 66159 firebird 1 480 23120K 5760K select 0:01 1.17% fb_inet_server 5156 root 1 440 9024K 544K select 57:39 0.68% snmpd 66182 root 1 440 4556K 2608K RUN 0:00 0.68% top 66147 root 1 80 3124K 840K nanslp 0:00 0.59% monitord 66138 firebird 1 440 23120K 5736K select 0:01 0.49% fb_inet_server 75745 www 1 440 24628K 9500K select 5:05 0.29% python2.5 66180 firebird 1 460 23120K 5852K select 0:00 0.10% fb_inet_server #top -S -C last pid: 66209; load averages: 2.13, 2.10, 2.02 up 10+23:41:07 22:06:34 814 processes: 6 running, 788 sleeping, 1 zombie, 18 waiting, 1 lock CPU: 9.3% user, 0.0% nice, 13.4% system, 12.8% interrupt, 64.5% idle Mem: 269M Active, 56M Inact, 148M Wired, 12M Cache, 60M Buf, 3700K Free Swap: 2048M Total, 1903M Used, 145M Free, 92% Inuse PID USERNAMETHR PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIMECPU COMMAND 11 root 1 171 ki31 0K 8K RUN104.1H 92.29% idle: cpu0 66138 firebird 1 490 23120K 5556K select 0:01 1.46% fb_inet_server 66180 firebird 1 440 23120K 5612K select 0:01 0.59% fb_inet_server 66209 root 1 440 4556K 2556K RUN 0:00 0.59% top 66179 firebird 1 440 23120K 5624K select 0:01 0.49% fb_inet_server 5156 root 1 440 9024K 544K select 57:39 0.39% snmpd 66147 root 1 80 3124K 840K nanslp 0:01 0.39% monitord 66178 firebird 1 440 23120K 5584K select 0:01 0.20% fb_inet_server 12 root 1 -44- 0K 8K WAIT 126.8H 0.00% swi1: net 42 root 1 -68- 0K 8K - 219:53 0.00% dummynet -- KES mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
swap_pager_getswapspace(7): failed
Здравствуйте, Questions. Jan 19 17:00:01 kes kernel: swap_pager_getswapspace(7): failed Jan 19 17:00:01 kes kernel: swap_pager_getswapspace(16): failed Jan 19 17:00:01 kes kernel: swap_pager_getswapspace(16): failed Jan 19 17:00:01 kes kernel: swap_pager_getswapspace(4): failed How to detect which process "eat" all swap space? -- С уважением, KES mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
BUG or FEATURE
Здравствуйте, Questions. I have two routing tables, three LAN: one internal, two external. I have connected VIA VPN to server through internal LAN. if in firewall I add: setfib 1 all from internal.lan.ip to any The packet inside VPN tunnel is marked to have fib 1 and will leave router acording routing table 2 (fib 1) If client IP is 10.0.0.2 and router IP is 10.0.0.1 and LAN interface is rl2 If VPN interface on router is ng0 and framed IP for VPN client is 192.168.0.2 it seems that setfib 1 all from internal.lan.ip to any in recv rl2 is equivalent to setfib 1 all from 192.168.0.2 to any in recv ng0 Is this feature or bug that packet inside tunnel is also marked to have same fib as tunnel/transport packet has? -- С уважением, KES mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
kernel: WARNING
Здравствуйте, Questions. Jan 10 22:26:13 kes kernel: WARNING: attempt to net_add_domain(netgraph) after domainfinalize() Does this messages harmfull or not? How to solve this warning? -- С уважением, KES mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re[2]: Best torrent client/server available for FreeBSD?
Здравствуйте, Justin. Вы писали 8 января 2009 г., 5:54:14: >> I have found myself to like rtorrent, which is a very powerful console >> torrent client. JJ> I've been using transmission-daemon recently and I'm getting JJ> comfortable with it. I like the fact that it can be controlled via a JJ> web browser. Can be controlled from the CLI with transmission-remote JJ> too. I use torrent flux -- С уважением, KES mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re[2]: How to do ping really quiet?
Hello, Frederique. FR> KES wrote: >> Hello, Questions. >> >> When I use >> ping -q ya.ru >> I get >> ping: sendto: No route to host >> >> How to make ping really quiet? >> FR> Try: FR> sh -c 'ping -q ya.ru > /dev/null 2>&1' man ping -q Quiet output. Nothing is displayed except the summary lines at startup time and when finished. That is mistake in Doc or in ping. Thx. This help, but seems ugly. Because of I can miss other maybe usefull errors (( ping -q ya.ru 2>/dev/null Any other suggestions? -- С уважением, KES mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
How to do ping really quiet?
Hello, Questions. When I use ping -q ya.ru I get ping: sendto: No route to host How to make ping really quiet? KES mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
tcpdump filter for out/in traffic
Здравствуйте, Questions. There will be very usefull to have options for tcpdump to monitor incomint or outgoing traffic regardless of src/dst IPs or ports or protocol For example: kes# tcpdump -n -i rl4 out EXPECTED: show traffic outgoing on rl4 ACTUAL: tcpdump: syntax error kes# tcpdump -n -i rl4 in EXPECTED: show traffic incoming on rl4 ACTUAL: tcpdump: syntax error -- С уважением, KES mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Routing table for service
Здравствуйте, Questions. Is there any options to set routing table for service? For example: rc.conf named_enable="YES" named_fib="2" so it will be run as: setfib 2 /usr/sbin/named -t /var/named -u bind instead of /usr/sbin/named -t /var/named -u bind -- С уважением, KES mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re[2]: BUG! Performance loss with dynamic IPFW rules
Здравствуйте, KES. Вы писали 30 декабря 2008 г., 22:29:50: K> Здравствуйте, KES. K> Вы писали 30 декабря 2008 г., 21:47:40: K>> Здравствуйте, Questions. K>> 1 allow all from any to any via rl0 K>> 2 allow all from any to any via rl1 K>> 109 skipto 110 tcp from any to any 80 in recv $iface #split only http trafic K>> 109 skipto 200 all from any to any #do not split all other trafic K>> 110 check-state K>> 111 prob 0.5 skipto 131 in recv rl2 K>> 121 skipto 122 keep-state in recv rl2 K>> 123 setfib 0 proto all in recv rl2 K>> 125 skipto 150 proto all in recv rl2 K>> 131 skipto 132 keep-state in recv rl2 K>> 133 setfib 1 proto all in recv rl2 K>> 135 skipto 150 proto all in recv rl2 K>> I am connected on rl1. K>> INET is rl0, rl1 each 4Mbit/s K>> When I open many connections I get performance loss: K>> 1) Web pages are not opened (it seems flow at start goes through rl0 K>> and then goes rl1. EXPECTED: it flows only through one channel until K>> closed) K>> 2) I get about 2Mbit/s while downloading something K>> When I not open many flows I get 8Mbit/s while serfing K>> What is problem? K> Also another interesting behaviour. K> Packets with FIB 1 are outgoing through rl0 interface, but must out go K> via rl1. Why? I resolve problem!!! I have mpd5 on both interfaces rl0 and rl1. It starts PPPoE connection with my ISP. mpd5 has FIB 0. and has option to NAT packets. When I send packet from rl2 to INET it is: tcpdump -n -i rl1 22:51:40.917666 IP 192.168.9.80.3113 > 205.188.8.85.5190: P 1:27(26) ack 1461 win 65535 I add counters for 192.168.9.80 to ipfw 05500711 54217 count ip from any to any out xmit rl1 05510711 54217 count tag 1 ip from 192.168.9.80 to any out xmit rl1 05515 0 0 deny log ip from any to any out xmit rl1 not tagged 1 05890711 54217 allow untag 1 ip from any to any out xmit rl1 tagged 1 05899 0 0 deny log ip from any to any via rl1 05899 0 0 skipto 65000 ip from any to any Then packet is NATed by mpd (it runned with FIB 0) and out via rl0! instead of rl1 =( I think packet changes its FIB after NATing by process with different FIB than packet itself =( look tcpdump. kes# ifconfig rl0 rl0: flags=88d1 metric 0 mtu 1492 inet 92.113.11.221 --> 195.5.5.202 netmask 0x kes# ifconfig rl1 rl1: flags=88d1 metric 0 mtu 1492 inet 91.124.184.62 --> 195.5.5.209 netmask 0x tcpdump -n -i rl0 23:00:39.013565 IP 91.124.184.62 > 68.147.56.238: ICMP 91.124.184.62 udp port 59344 unreachable, length 36 23:00:39.043593 IP 91.124.184.62 > 69.251.246.7: ICMP 91.124.184.62 udp port 59344 unreachable, length 36 23:00:39.675315 IP 91.124.184.62 > 71.30.187.17: ICMP 91.124.184.62 udp port 10758 unreachable, length 36 23:00:39.818931 IP 91.124.184.62 > 117.11.167.163: ICMP 91.124.184.62 udp port 10758 unreachable, length 36 23:00:41.865974 IP 91.124.184.62 > 67.177.215.23: ICMP 91.124.184.62 udp port 10758 unreachable, length 36 23:00:43.289822 IP 91.124.184.62 > 88.84.178.189: ICMP 91.124.184.62 udp port 10758 unreachable, length 36 tcpdump -n -i rl1 23:00:39.013133 IP 68.147.56.238.23877 > 91.124.184.62.59344: UDP, length 103 23:00:39.042899 IP 69.251.246.7.46602 > 91.124.184.62.59344: UDP, length 103 23:00:39.675293 IP 71.30.187.17.61710 > 91.124.184.62.10758: UDP, length 103 23:00:39.818910 IP 117.11.167.163.12312 > 91.124.184.62.10758: UDP, length 98 23:00:41.865952 IP 67.177.215.23.24147 > 91.124.184.62.10758: UDP, length 98 23:00:43.289801 IP 88.84.178.189.60799 > 91.124.184.62.10758: UDP, length 101 23:00:43.419409 IP 93.80.208.87.61523 > 91.124.184.62.10758: S 3219801041:3219801041(0) win 8192 mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Performance loss with dynamic IPFW rules
Здравствуйте, KES. Вы писали 30 декабря 2008 г., 21:47:40: K> Здравствуйте, Questions. K> 1 allow all from any to any via rl0 K> 2 allow all from any to any via rl1 K> 109 skipto 110 tcp from any to any 80 in recv $iface #split only http trafic K> 109 skipto 200 all from any to any #do not split all other trafic K> 110 check-state K> 111 prob 0.5 skipto 131 in recv rl2 K> 121 skipto 122 keep-state in recv rl2 K> 123 setfib 0 proto all in recv rl2 K> 125 skipto 150 proto all in recv rl2 K> 131 skipto 132 keep-state in recv rl2 K> 133 setfib 1 proto all in recv rl2 K> 135 skipto 150 proto all in recv rl2 K> I am connected on rl1. K> INET is rl0, rl1 each 4Mbit/s K> When I open many connections I get performance loss: K> 1) Web pages are not opened (it seems flow at start goes through rl0 K> and then goes rl1. EXPECTED: it flows only through one channel until K> closed) K> 2) I get about 2Mbit/s while downloading something K> When I not open many flows I get 8Mbit/s while serfing K> What is problem? Also another interesting behaviour. Packets with FIB 1 are outgoing through rl0 interface, but must out go via rl1. Why? -- С уважением, KES mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Performance loss with dynamic IPFW rules
Здравствуйте, Questions. 1 allow all from any to any via rl0 2 allow all from any to any via rl1 109 skipto 110 tcp from any to any 80 in recv $iface #split only http trafic 109 skipto 200 all from any to any #do not split all other trafic 110 check-state 111 prob 0.5 skipto 131 in recv rl2 121 skipto 122 keep-state in recv rl2 123 setfib 0 proto all in recv rl2 125 skipto 150 proto all in recv rl2 131 skipto 132 keep-state in recv rl2 133 setfib 1 proto all in recv rl2 135 skipto 150 proto all in recv rl2 I am connected on rl1. INET is rl0, rl1 each 4Mbit/s When I open many connections I get performance loss: 1) Web pages are not opened (it seems flow at start goes through rl0 and then goes rl1. EXPECTED: it flows only through one channel until closed) 2) I get about 2Mbit/s while downloading something When I not open many flows I get 8Mbit/s while serfing What is problem? -- С уважением, KES mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re[2]: can not start SVNserve
Здравствуйте, Mel. Вы писали 25 декабря 2008 г., 20:13:32: M> On Tuesday 23 December 2008 13:50:59 KES wrote: >> Здравствуйте, KES. >> >> Вы писали 21 декабря 2008 г., 13:49:04: >> >> K> Здравствуйте, Mel. >> >> K> Вы писали 21 декабря 2008 г., 13:10:47: >> >> M>> On Thursday 18 December 2008 09:03:54 KES wrote: >> >>> Здравствуйте, Mel. >> >>> >> >>> Вы писали 18 декабря 2008 г., 9:05:35: >> >>> >> >>> M> On Wednesday 17 December 2008 21:02:07 KES wrote: >> >>> >> Здравствуйте, Mel. >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Вы писали 17 декабря 2008 г., 9:11:19: >> >>> >> >> >>> >> M> On Sunday 14 December 2008 16:11:17 KES wrote: >> >>> >> >> Здравствуйте, Polytropon. >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> Вы писали 14 декабря 2008 г., 15:11:35: >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> P> On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 12:58:55 +0100 (CET), Wojciech Puchar >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> P> wrote: >> >>> >> >> >> > su: Sorry >> >>> >> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> >> > kes# pw user mod svn -s /bin/bash >> >>> >> >> >> > kes# pw user show svn >> >>> >> >> >> > svn:*:1005:1005::0:0:SVN user:/nonexistent:/bin/bash >> >>> >> >> >> > kes# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve start >> >>> >> >> >> > Starting svnserve. >> >>> >> >> >> > su: Sorry >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> try to change directory to existent >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> P> (1) What's /bin/bash? Check existing shell. >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> P> (2) As you said: Check existing directory. >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> P> (3) Regarding su, check for wheel group inclusion. >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> home# uname -a >> >>> >> >> FreeBSD home.kes.net.ua 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Tue Aug >> >>> >> >> 12 02:11:24 EEST 2008 >> >>> >> >> k...@kes.net.ua:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KES_KERN_v7 i386 home# pw >> >>> >> >> user show svn >> >>> >> >> svn:*:1003:1002::0:0:SVN user:/nonexistent:/usr/sbin/nologin >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> As you can see on 'home' machine svn user has no valid shell also >> >>> >> >> it has not valid home directory and it is not included into wheel >> >>> >> >> group >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> But svnserve is started and works fine. With same settings >> >>> >> >> svnserve does not work on >> >>> >> >> kes# uname -a >> >>> >> >> FreeBSD kes.net.ua 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #: Sun >> >>> >> >> Nov 23 17:19:12 EET 2008 >> >>> >> >> k...@home.kes.net.ua:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KES_KERN_v7 i386 >> >>> >> >> >>> >> M> echo 'rc_debug="YES"'>>/etc/rc.conf >> >>> >> M> /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve start >> >>> >> >> >>> >> M> Show output from /var/log/messages. >> >>> >> >> >>> >> kes# kes# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve start >> >>> >> /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve: DEBUG: checkyesno: svnserve_enable is >> >>> >> set to YES. Starting svnserve. >> >>> >> /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve: DEBUG: run_rc_command: doit: su -m svn >> >>> >> -c 'sh -c "/usr/local/bin/svnserve -d --listen-port=3690 >> >>> >> --foreground -r /var/db/trunk"' su: Sorry >> >>> >> >>> M> Does this command work from the command line? >> >>> M> If not, does it work if called as su -fm rather then su -m? >> >>> M> If that does not work, does the primary group svn is supposed to be
Re[3]: can not start SVNserve
Здравствуйте, KES. Вы писали 21 декабря 2008 г., 13:49:04: K> Здравствуйте, Mel. K> Вы писали 21 декабря 2008 г., 13:10:47: M>> On Thursday 18 December 2008 09:03:54 KES wrote: >>> Здравствуйте, Mel. >>> >>> Вы писали 18 декабря 2008 г., 9:05:35: >>> >>> M> On Wednesday 17 December 2008 21:02:07 KES wrote: >>> >> Здравствуйте, Mel. >>> >> >>> >> Вы писали 17 декабря 2008 г., 9:11:19: >>> >> >>> >> M> On Sunday 14 December 2008 16:11:17 KES wrote: >>> >> >> Здравствуйте, Polytropon. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Вы писали 14 декабря 2008 г., 15:11:35: >>> >> >> >>> >> >> P> On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 12:58:55 +0100 (CET), Wojciech Puchar >>> >> >> >>> >> >> P> wrote: >>> >> >> >> > su: Sorry >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> > kes# pw user mod svn -s /bin/bash >>> >> >> >> > kes# pw user show svn >>> >> >> >> > svn:*:1005:1005::0:0:SVN user:/nonexistent:/bin/bash >>> >> >> >> > kes# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve start >>> >> >> >> > Starting svnserve. >>> >> >> >> > su: Sorry >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> try to change directory to existent >>> >> >> >>> >> >> P> (1) What's /bin/bash? Check existing shell. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> P> (2) As you said: Check existing directory. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> P> (3) Regarding su, check for wheel group inclusion. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> home# uname -a >>> >> >> FreeBSD home.kes.net.ua 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Tue Aug 12 >>> >> >> 02:11:24 EEST 2008 >>> >> >> k...@kes.net.ua:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KES_KERN_v7 i386 home# pw user >>> >> >> show svn >>> >> >> svn:*:1003:1002::0:0:SVN user:/nonexistent:/usr/sbin/nologin >>> >> >> >>> >> >> As you can see on 'home' machine svn user has no valid shell also it >>> >> >> has not valid home directory and it is not included into wheel group >>> >> >> >>> >> >> But svnserve is started and works fine. With same settings svnserve >>> >> >> does not work on >>> >> >> kes# uname -a >>> >> >> FreeBSD kes.net.ua 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #: Sun Nov >>> >> >> 23 17:19:12 EET 2008 >>> >> >> k...@home.kes.net.ua:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KES_KERN_v7 i386 >>> >> >>> >> M> echo 'rc_debug="YES"'>>/etc/rc.conf >>> >> M> /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve start >>> >> >>> >> M> Show output from /var/log/messages. >>> >> >>> >> kes# kes# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve start >>> >> /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve: DEBUG: checkyesno: svnserve_enable is set >>> >> to YES. Starting svnserve. >>> >> /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve: DEBUG: run_rc_command: doit: su -m svn -c >>> >> 'sh -c "/usr/local/bin/svnserve -d --listen-port=3690 --foreground -r >>> >> /var/db/trunk"' su: Sorry >>> >>> M> Does this command work from the command line? >>> M> If not, does it work if called as su -fm rather then su -m? >>> M> If that does not work, does the primary group svn is supposed to be in >>> exist? >>> >>> >>> kes# su -m svn -c 'sh -c "/usr/local/bin/svnserve -d --listen-port=3690 >>> --foreground -r /var/db/trunk"' su: Sorry >>> kes# su -fm svn -c 'sh -c "/usr/local/bin/svnserve -d --listen-port=3690 >>> --foreground -r /var/db/trunk"' su: Sorry >>> kes# pw group show svn >>> svn:*:1005: >>> kes# cat /etc/group | grep svn >>> svn:*:1005: >>> kes# pw user show svn >>> svn:*:1005:1005::0:0:SVN user:/nonexistent:/bin/bash >>> >>> As you see it does not work also with -fm option >>> >>> >>> Also I notice next differences between FreeBDS 7.0 and 7.1 (detail below) >>> Notice that on both system a
May I load DLL same as SO in FreeBSD?
Is it possible to load DLL? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re[2]: can not start SVNserve
Здравствуйте, Mel. Вы писали 21 декабря 2008 г., 13:10:47: M> On Thursday 18 December 2008 09:03:54 KES wrote: >> Здравствуйте, Mel. >> >> Вы писали 18 декабря 2008 г., 9:05:35: >> >> M> On Wednesday 17 December 2008 21:02:07 KES wrote: >> >> Здравствуйте, Mel. >> >> >> >> Вы писали 17 декабря 2008 г., 9:11:19: >> >> >> >> M> On Sunday 14 December 2008 16:11:17 KES wrote: >> >> >> Здравствуйте, Polytropon. >> >> >> >> >> >> Вы писали 14 декабря 2008 г., 15:11:35: >> >> >> >> >> >> P> On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 12:58:55 +0100 (CET), Wojciech Puchar >> >> >> >> >> >> P> wrote: >> >> >> >> > su: Sorry >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > kes# pw user mod svn -s /bin/bash >> >> >> >> > kes# pw user show svn >> >> >> >> > svn:*:1005:1005::0:0:SVN user:/nonexistent:/bin/bash >> >> >> >> > kes# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve start >> >> >> >> > Starting svnserve. >> >> >> >> > su: Sorry >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> try to change directory to existent >> >> >> >> >> >> P> (1) What's /bin/bash? Check existing shell. >> >> >> >> >> >> P> (2) As you said: Check existing directory. >> >> >> >> >> >> P> (3) Regarding su, check for wheel group inclusion. >> >> >> >> >> >> home# uname -a >> >> >> FreeBSD home.kes.net.ua 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Tue Aug 12 >> >> >> 02:11:24 EEST 2008 >> >> >> k...@kes.net.ua:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KES_KERN_v7 i386 home# pw user >> >> >> show svn >> >> >> svn:*:1003:1002::0:0:SVN user:/nonexistent:/usr/sbin/nologin >> >> >> >> >> >> As you can see on 'home' machine svn user has no valid shell also it >> >> >> has not valid home directory and it is not included into wheel group >> >> >> >> >> >> But svnserve is started and works fine. With same settings svnserve >> >> >> does not work on >> >> >> kes# uname -a >> >> >> FreeBSD kes.net.ua 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #: Sun Nov >> >> >> 23 17:19:12 EET 2008 >> >> >> k...@home.kes.net.ua:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KES_KERN_v7 i386 >> >> >> >> M> echo 'rc_debug="YES"'>>/etc/rc.conf >> >> M> /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve start >> >> >> >> M> Show output from /var/log/messages. >> >> >> >> kes# kes# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve start >> >> /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve: DEBUG: checkyesno: svnserve_enable is set >> >> to YES. Starting svnserve. >> >> /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve: DEBUG: run_rc_command: doit: su -m svn -c >> >> 'sh -c "/usr/local/bin/svnserve -d --listen-port=3690 --foreground -r >> >> /var/db/trunk"' su: Sorry >> >> M> Does this command work from the command line? >> M> If not, does it work if called as su -fm rather then su -m? >> M> If that does not work, does the primary group svn is supposed to be in >> exist? >> >> >> kes# su -m svn -c 'sh -c "/usr/local/bin/svnserve -d --listen-port=3690 >> --foreground -r /var/db/trunk"' su: Sorry >> kes# su -fm svn -c 'sh -c "/usr/local/bin/svnserve -d --listen-port=3690 >> --foreground -r /var/db/trunk"' su: Sorry >> kes# pw group show svn >> svn:*:1005: >> kes# cat /etc/group | grep svn >> svn:*:1005: >> kes# pw user show svn >> svn:*:1005:1005::0:0:SVN user:/nonexistent:/bin/bash >> >> As you see it does not work also with -fm option >> >> >> Also I notice next differences between FreeBDS 7.0 and 7.1 (detail below) >> Notice that on both system account is locked, has no valid shell and >> home directory >> on FreeBSD 7.0 when I try to login with svn user it says: This account is >> currently not available. on FreeBSD 7.1 when I try to login with svn user >> it says: su: Sorry Maybe there is a problem with su on FreeBSD 7.1? >> >> >> >> home# pw user show svn >> svn:*:1003:1002::0:0:SVN user:/nonexistent:/usr/sbin/nologin >> home# su svn >> This account is currently not available. >> >> >> kes# pw user show svn >> svn:*:1005:1005::0:0:SVN user:/nonexistent:/bin/bash >> kes# su svn >> su: Sorry >> kes# pw user mod svn -s /usr/bin/nologin >> kes# pw user show svn >> svn:*:1005:1005::0:0:SVN user:/nonexistent:/usr/bin/nologin >> kes# su svn >> su: Sorry M> The problem is elsewhere. Probably in pam(3) on the faulty machine. The only M> change to su.c from 7.0 to 7.1 is fixing a compiler warning. There are 3 M> instances where su exits with "Sorry". All occasions are logged to syslog. M> Can you dig those log entries up? Dec 21 13:47:54 kes su: kes to root on /dev/ttyp5 Dec 21 13:47:58 kes kes: /r/svnserve: DEBUG: checkyesno: svnserve_enable is set to YES. Dec 21 13:47:58 kes kes: /r/svnserve: DEBUG: run_rc_command: doit: su -m svn -c 'sh -c "/usr/local/bin/svnserve -d --listen-port=3690 --foreground -r /var/db/trunk"' Dec 21 13:47:58 kes su: pam_acct_mgmt: authentication error Yeah, there is problem with pam. Why pam restrict root to run command under other user? -- С уважением, KES mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Fwd: Re: Re[4]: can not start SVNserve
Здравствуйте, . -- Пересылаемое письмо -- От: David Weintraub К: KES А также к: us...@subversion.tigris.org Время создания: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:30:51 -0500 Тема:can not start SVNserve Прикрепленные файлы: The problem is the "su" command. For some reason, it is refusing to execute the svnserve command. You can try to figure out why "su" isn't working or you can switch to "sudo". I don't think we can give you any more help with this list. On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 1:57 PM, KES wrote: > Здравствуйте, David. > > > DW> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 3:03 AM, KES wrote: >>> Здравствуйте, Mel. >>> >>> Вы писали 18 декабря 2008 г., 9:05:35: >>> >>> M> On Wednesday 17 December 2008 21:02:07 KES wrote: >>>>> Здравствуйте, Mel. >>>>> >>>>> Вы писали 17 декабря 2008 г., 9:11:19: >>>>> >>>>> M> On Sunday 14 December 2008 16:11:17 KES wrote: >>>>> >> Здравствуйте, Polytropon. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Вы писали 14 декабря 2008 г., 15:11:35: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> P> On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 12:58:55 +0100 (CET), Wojciech Puchar >>>>> >> >>>>> >> P> wrote: >>>>> >> >> > su: Sorry >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > kes# pw user mod svn -s /bin/bash >>>>> >> >> > kes# pw user show svn >>>>> >> >> > svn:*:1005:1005::0:0:SVN user:/nonexistent:/bin/bash >>>>> >> >> > kes# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve start >>>>> >> >> > Starting svnserve. >>>>> >> >> > su: Sorry >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> try to change directory to existent >>>>> >> >>>>> >> P> (1) What's /bin/bash? Check existing shell. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> P> (2) As you said: Check existing directory. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> P> (3) Regarding su, check for wheel group inclusion. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> home# uname -a >>>>> >> FreeBSD home.kes.net.ua 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Tue Aug 12 >>>>> >> 02:11:24 EEST 2008 k...@kes.net.ua:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KES_KERN_v7 >>>>> >> i386 home# pw user show svn >>>>> >> svn:*:1003:1002::0:0:SVN user:/nonexistent:/usr/sbin/nologin >>>>> >> >>>>> >> As you can see on 'home' machine svn user has no valid shell also it >>>>> >> has not valid home directory and it is not included into wheel group >>>>> >> >>>>> >> But svnserve is started and works fine. With same settings svnserve >>>>> >> does not work on >>>>> >> kes# uname -a >>>>> >> FreeBSD kes.net.ua 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #: Sun Nov 23 >>>>> >> 17:19:12 EET 2008 >>>>> >> k...@home.kes.net.ua:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KES_KERN_v7 i386 >>>>> >>>>> M> echo 'rc_debug="YES"'>>/etc/rc.conf >>>>> M> /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve start >>>>> >>>>> M> Show output from /var/log/messages. >>>>> >>>>> kes# kes# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve start >>>>> /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve: DEBUG: checkyesno: svnserve_enable is set to >>>>> YES. Starting svnserve. >>>>> /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve: DEBUG: run_rc_command: doit: su -m svn -c >>>>> 'sh >>>>> -c "/usr/local/bin/svnserve -d --listen-port=3690 --foreground -r >>>>> /var/db/trunk"' su: Sorry >>> >>> M> Does this command work from the command line? >>> M> If not, does it work if called as su -fm rather then su -m? >>> M> If that does not work, does the primary group svn is supposed to be in >>> exist? >>> >>> >>> kes# su -m svn -c 'sh -c "/usr/local/bin/svnserve -d --listen-port=3690 >>> --foreground -r /var/db/trunk"' >>> su: Sorry >>> kes# su -fm svn -c 'sh -c "/usr/local/bin/svnserve -d --listen-port=3690 >>> --foreground -r /var/db/trunk"&#
Re[4]: can not start SVNserve
Здравствуйте, David. DW> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 3:03 AM, KES wrote: >> Здравствуйте, Mel. >> >> Вы писали 18 декабря 2008 г., 9:05:35: >> >> M> On Wednesday 17 December 2008 21:02:07 KES wrote: >>>> Здравствуйте, Mel. >>>> >>>> Вы писали 17 декабря 2008 г., 9:11:19: >>>> >>>> M> On Sunday 14 December 2008 16:11:17 KES wrote: >>>> >> Здравствуйте, Polytropon. >>>> >> >>>> >> Вы писали 14 декабря 2008 г., 15:11:35: >>>> >> >>>> >> P> On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 12:58:55 +0100 (CET), Wojciech Puchar >>>> >> >>>> >> P> wrote: >>>> >> >> > su: Sorry >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > kes# pw user mod svn -s /bin/bash >>>> >> >> > kes# pw user show svn >>>> >> >> > svn:*:1005:1005::0:0:SVN user:/nonexistent:/bin/bash >>>> >> >> > kes# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve start >>>> >> >> > Starting svnserve. >>>> >> >> > su: Sorry >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> try to change directory to existent >>>> >> >>>> >> P> (1) What's /bin/bash? Check existing shell. >>>> >> >>>> >> P> (2) As you said: Check existing directory. >>>> >> >>>> >> P> (3) Regarding su, check for wheel group inclusion. >>>> >> >>>> >> home# uname -a >>>> >> FreeBSD home.kes.net.ua 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Tue Aug 12 >>>> >> 02:11:24 EEST 2008 k...@kes.net.ua:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KES_KERN_v7 >>>> >> i386 home# pw user show svn >>>> >> svn:*:1003:1002::0:0:SVN user:/nonexistent:/usr/sbin/nologin >>>> >> >>>> >> As you can see on 'home' machine svn user has no valid shell also it >>>> >> has not valid home directory and it is not included into wheel group >>>> >> >>>> >> But svnserve is started and works fine. With same settings svnserve >>>> >> does not work on >>>> >> kes# uname -a >>>> >> FreeBSD kes.net.ua 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #: Sun Nov 23 >>>> >> 17:19:12 EET 2008 >>>> >> k...@home.kes.net.ua:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KES_KERN_v7 i386 >>>> >>>> M> echo 'rc_debug="YES"'>>/etc/rc.conf >>>> M> /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve start >>>> >>>> M> Show output from /var/log/messages. >>>> >>>> kes# kes# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve start >>>> /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve: DEBUG: checkyesno: svnserve_enable is set to >>>> YES. Starting svnserve. >>>> /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve: DEBUG: run_rc_command: doit: su -m svn -c 'sh >>>> -c "/usr/local/bin/svnserve -d --listen-port=3690 --foreground -r >>>> /var/db/trunk"' su: Sorry >> >> M> Does this command work from the command line? >> M> If not, does it work if called as su -fm rather then su -m? >> M> If that does not work, does the primary group svn is supposed to be in >> exist? >> >> >> kes# su -m svn -c 'sh -c "/usr/local/bin/svnserve -d --listen-port=3690 >> --foreground -r /var/db/trunk"' >> su: Sorry >> kes# su -fm svn -c 'sh -c "/usr/local/bin/svnserve -d --listen-port=3690 >> --foreground -r /var/db/trunk"' >> su: Sorry >> kes# pw group show svn >> svn:*:1005: >> kes# cat /etc/group | grep svn >> svn:*:1005: >> kes# pw user show svn >> svn:*:1005:1005::0:0:SVN user:/nonexistent:/bin/bash >> >> As you see it does not work also with -fm option >> >> >> Also I notice next differences between FreeBDS 7.0 and 7.1 (detail below) >> Notice that on both system account is locked, has no valid shell and >> home directory >> on FreeBSD 7.0 when I try to login with svn user it says: This account is >> currently not available. >> on FreeBSD 7.1 when I try to login with svn user it says: su: Sorry >> Maybe there is a problem with su on FreeBSD 7.1? >> >> >> >> home# pw user show svn >> svn:*:1003:1002::0:0:SVN user:/nonexistent:/usr/sbin/nologin >> home# su svn >> This account is currently not available. >> >> >> kes# pw user show svn >> svn:*:1005:1005::0:0:SVN user:/nonexistent:/bin/bash >> kes# su svn >> su: Sorry >> kes# pw user mod svn -s /usr/bin/nologin >> kes# pw user show svn >> svn:*:1005:1005::0:0:SVN user:/nonexistent:/usr/bin/nologin >> kes# su svn >> su: Sorry >> DW> Why don't you setup "sudo" and see if that will work for you? I've DW> always found sudo much less troublesome than "su". DW> Then, you can modify your startup script to use sudo instead of "su". Why maintainer of rc.subr use 'su' instead of 'sudo'? Maybe su has some benefit I do not know. If I edit standart rc.subr to use sudo instead of 'su' there maybe other sripts will not sturtup. -- С уважением, KES mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re[4]: can not start SVNserve
Здравствуйте, David. DW> Is user "svn" a member of the group "wheel"? See DW> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2004-November/063649.html It is not required to be member of group wheel to low process rights from root. wheel group is requierd only if I want to rise my rights to root. Also notice that on both systems 'home' and 'kes' there is svn group and user. The svn user is not member of wheel group. On both systems user svn has not home directory and has not valid shell (because of it is not required to login as svn user, this is just user to start svnserve process) On FreeBSD 7.0 svnserve startsup normally, on 7.1 it can not Error is described earlier. DW> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 3:02 PM, KES wrote: >> Здравствуйте, Mel. >> >> Вы писали 17 декабря 2008 г., 9:11:19: >> >> M> On Sunday 14 December 2008 16:11:17 KES wrote: >>>> Здравствуйте, Polytropon. >>>> >>>> Вы писали 14 декабря 2008 г., 15:11:35: >>>> >>>> P> On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 12:58:55 +0100 (CET), Wojciech Puchar >>>> >>>> P> wrote: >>>> >> > su: Sorry >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > kes# pw user mod svn -s /bin/bash >>>> >> > kes# pw user show svn >>>> >> > svn:*:1005:1005::0:0:SVN user:/nonexistent:/bin/bash >>>> >> > kes# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve start >>>> >> > Starting svnserve. >>>> >> > su: Sorry >>>> >> >>>> >> try to change directory to existent >>>> >>>> P> (1) What's /bin/bash? Check existing shell. >>>> >>>> P> (2) As you said: Check existing directory. >>>> >>>> P> (3) Regarding su, check for wheel group inclusion. >>>> >>>> home# uname -a >>>> FreeBSD home.kes.net.ua 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Tue Aug 12 >>>> 02:11:24 EEST 2008 k...@kes.net.ua:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KES_KERN_v7 >>>> i386 home# pw user show svn >>>> svn:*:1003:1002::0:0:SVN user:/nonexistent:/usr/sbin/nologin >>>> >>>> As you can see on 'home' machine svn user has no valid shell also it >>>> has not valid home directory and it is not included into wheel group >>>> >>>> But svnserve is started and works fine. With same settings svnserve >>>> does not work on >>>> kes# uname -a >>>> FreeBSD kes.net.ua 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #: Sun Nov 23 >>>> 17:19:12 EET 2008 k...@home.kes.net.ua:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KES_KERN_v7 >>>> i386 >> >> M> echo 'rc_debug="YES"'>>/etc/rc.conf >> M> /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve start >> >> M> Show output from /var/log/messages. >> >> kes# kes# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve start >> /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve: DEBUG: checkyesno: svnserve_enable is set to >> YES. >> Starting svnserve. >> /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve: DEBUG: run_rc_command: doit: su -m svn -c 'sh >> -c "/usr/local/bin/svnserve -d --listen-port=3690 --foreground -r >> /var/db/trunk"' >> su: Sorry >> >> >> -- >> С уважением, >> KES mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru >> >> -- С уважением, KES mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
BUG can not add address to interface
Здравствуйте, Archie. mpd5.conf has: set link max-redial 0 mpd5 does not try to redial if connection is successfull but interface adress change is fail: 8 02:50:14 kes mpd: [UKR_B4] IPCP: LayerUp 8 02:50:14 kes mpd: [UKR_B4] 92.113.72.242 -> 195.5.5.203 8 02:50:14 kes mpd: [UKR_B4] IFACE: Connecting NAT 8 02:50:14 kes mpd: [UKR_B4] IFACE: Add address 92.113.72.242/32->195.5.5.203 to ng1 8 02:50:14 kes mpd: [UKR_B4] system: /usr/local/etc/mpd5/adsl1.up ng1 inet 92.113.72.242/32 195.5.5.203 '-' 8 02:50:14 kes mpd: [UKR_B4] IFACE: Up event 8 02:50:14 kes mpd: [UKR_B4] IFACE: Change interface flags: -0 +1 8 03:49:29 kes mpd: [UKR_B3] IFACE: Add address 92.113.89.194/32->195.5.5.203 to ng0 8 03:49:29 kes mpd: [UKR_B3] IFACE: Adding IPv4 address to ng0 failed: File exists 8 03:49:29 kes mpd: [UKR_B3] IFACE: IfaceChangeAddr() error, closing IPCP 8 03:49:29 kes mpd: [UKR_B3] IPCP: parameter negotiation failed 8 03:49:29 kes mpd: [UKR_B3] IPCP: state change Opened --> Stopping 8 03:49:29 kes mpd: [UKR_B3] IPCP: SendTerminateReq #16 8 03:49:29 kes mpd: [UKR_B3] IPCP: LayerDown 8 03:49:29 kes mpd: [UKR_B3] IFACE: Remove address 92.113.89.194/32->195.5.5.203 from ng0 8 03:49:29 kes mpd: [UKR_B3] IFACE: Removing IPv4 address from ng0 failed: Can't assign requested address 8 03:49:29 kes mpd: [UKR_B3] IPCP: rec'd Terminate Ack #16 (Stopping) I have two ADSL connection to my provider. For both connections I have same gateway. How to establish two ADSL connections with same gateway? -- С уважением, KES mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re[2]: can not start SVNserve
Здравствуйте, Mel. Вы писали 18 декабря 2008 г., 9:05:35: M> On Wednesday 17 December 2008 21:02:07 KES wrote: >> Здравствуйте, Mel. >> >> Вы писали 17 декабря 2008 г., 9:11:19: >> >> M> On Sunday 14 December 2008 16:11:17 KES wrote: >> >> Здравствуйте, Polytropon. >> >> >> >> Вы писали 14 декабря 2008 г., 15:11:35: >> >> >> >> P> On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 12:58:55 +0100 (CET), Wojciech Puchar >> >> >> >> P> wrote: >> >> >> > su: Sorry >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > kes# pw user mod svn -s /bin/bash >> >> >> > kes# pw user show svn >> >> >> > svn:*:1005:1005::0:0:SVN user:/nonexistent:/bin/bash >> >> >> > kes# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve start >> >> >> > Starting svnserve. >> >> >> > su: Sorry >> >> >> >> >> >> try to change directory to existent >> >> >> >> P> (1) What's /bin/bash? Check existing shell. >> >> >> >> P> (2) As you said: Check existing directory. >> >> >> >> P> (3) Regarding su, check for wheel group inclusion. >> >> >> >> home# uname -a >> >> FreeBSD home.kes.net.ua 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Tue Aug 12 >> >> 02:11:24 EEST 2008 k...@kes.net.ua:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KES_KERN_v7 >> >> i386 home# pw user show svn >> >> svn:*:1003:1002::0:0:SVN user:/nonexistent:/usr/sbin/nologin >> >> >> >> As you can see on 'home' machine svn user has no valid shell also it >> >> has not valid home directory and it is not included into wheel group >> >> >> >> But svnserve is started and works fine. With same settings svnserve >> >> does not work on >> >> kes# uname -a >> >> FreeBSD kes.net.ua 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #: Sun Nov 23 >> >> 17:19:12 EET 2008 >> >> k...@home.kes.net.ua:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KES_KERN_v7 i386 >> >> M> echo 'rc_debug="YES"'>>/etc/rc.conf >> M> /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve start >> >> M> Show output from /var/log/messages. >> >> kes# kes# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve start >> /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve: DEBUG: checkyesno: svnserve_enable is set to >> YES. Starting svnserve. >> /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve: DEBUG: run_rc_command: doit: su -m svn -c 'sh >> -c "/usr/local/bin/svnserve -d --listen-port=3690 --foreground -r >> /var/db/trunk"' su: Sorry M> Does this command work from the command line? M> If not, does it work if called as su -fm rather then su -m? M> If that does not work, does the primary group svn is supposed to be in exist? kes# su -m svn -c 'sh -c "/usr/local/bin/svnserve -d --listen-port=3690 --foreground -r /var/db/trunk"' su: Sorry kes# su -fm svn -c 'sh -c "/usr/local/bin/svnserve -d --listen-port=3690 --foreground -r /var/db/trunk"' su: Sorry kes# pw group show svn svn:*:1005: kes# cat /etc/group | grep svn svn:*:1005: kes# pw user show svn svn:*:1005:1005::0:0:SVN user:/nonexistent:/bin/bash As you see it does not work also with -fm option Also I notice next differences between FreeBDS 7.0 and 7.1 (detail below) Notice that on both system account is locked, has no valid shell and home directory on FreeBSD 7.0 when I try to login with svn user it says: This account is currently not available. on FreeBSD 7.1 when I try to login with svn user it says: su: Sorry Maybe there is a problem with su on FreeBSD 7.1? home# pw user show svn svn:*:1003:1002::0:0:SVN user:/nonexistent:/usr/sbin/nologin home# su svn This account is currently not available. kes# pw user show svn svn:*:1005:1005::0:0:SVN user:/nonexistent:/bin/bash kes# su svn su: Sorry kes# pw user mod svn -s /usr/bin/nologin kes# pw user show svn svn:*:1005:1005::0:0:SVN user:/nonexistent:/usr/bin/nologin kes# su svn su: Sorry ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re[2]: can not start SVNserve
Здравствуйте, Mel. Вы писали 17 декабря 2008 г., 9:11:19: M> On Sunday 14 December 2008 16:11:17 KES wrote: >> Здравствуйте, Polytropon. >> >> Вы писали 14 декабря 2008 г., 15:11:35: >> >> P> On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 12:58:55 +0100 (CET), Wojciech Puchar >> >> P> wrote: >> >> > su: Sorry >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > kes# pw user mod svn -s /bin/bash >> >> > kes# pw user show svn >> >> > svn:*:1005:1005::0:0:SVN user:/nonexistent:/bin/bash >> >> > kes# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve start >> >> > Starting svnserve. >> >> > su: Sorry >> >> >> >> try to change directory to existent >> >> P> (1) What's /bin/bash? Check existing shell. >> >> P> (2) As you said: Check existing directory. >> >> P> (3) Regarding su, check for wheel group inclusion. >> >> home# uname -a >> FreeBSD home.kes.net.ua 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Tue Aug 12 >> 02:11:24 EEST 2008 k...@kes.net.ua:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KES_KERN_v7 >> i386 home# pw user show svn >> svn:*:1003:1002::0:0:SVN user:/nonexistent:/usr/sbin/nologin >> >> As you can see on 'home' machine svn user has no valid shell also it >> has not valid home directory and it is not included into wheel group >> >> But svnserve is started and works fine. With same settings svnserve >> does not work on >> kes# uname -a >> FreeBSD kes.net.ua 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #: Sun Nov 23 >> 17:19:12 EET 2008 k...@home.kes.net.ua:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KES_KERN_v7 >> i386 M> echo 'rc_debug="YES"'>>/etc/rc.conf M> /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve start M> Show output from /var/log/messages. kes# kes# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve start /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve: DEBUG: checkyesno: svnserve_enable is set to YES. Starting svnserve. /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve: DEBUG: run_rc_command: doit: su -m svn -c 'sh -c "/usr/local/bin/svnserve -d --listen-port=3690 --foreground -r /var/db/trunk"' su: Sorry -- С уважением, KES mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
can not view which fib process is using
Здравствуйте, Questions. How to view which FIB process if use? I cat setfib but I can not view later which fib use my FEATURE REEQUEST: implement option to 'ps' to view which FIB process is using Actually problem is next. I use 'torrentflux' I change index.php line 88 $command = "cd " . $cfg["path"] . $owner . "; HOME=".$cfg["path"]."; export HOME;"; -$command.= "nohup " .$cfg["btphpbin"] . " ".$runtime." ".$sharekill." ".$cfg["torrent_file_path"].$alias.".stat ".$owner." --response +$command.= " setfib ". rand(0,1) ." nohup " .$cfg["btphpbin"] . " ".$runtime." 20 ".$cfg["torrent_file_path"].$alias.".stat ".$owner. Notice 'setfib'. I use setfib here to run '/usr/local/libexec/btphptornado.py' to use default route 0 or default route 1. All instances of process that are using route 1 (setfib 1) are still go through route 0. kes# ifconfig ng0 ng0: flags=88d1 metric 0 mtu 1492 inet 92.113.8.197 --> 195.5.5.202 netmask 0x kes# ifconfig ng1 ng1: flags=88d1 metric 0 mtu 1492 inet 92.113.72.242 --> 195.5.5.203 netmask 0x kes# setfib 0 netstat -nr | less Routing tables Internet: DestinationGatewayFlagsRefs Use Netif Expire default195.5.5.202UGS 0 16327188ng0 kes# setfib 1 netstat -nr | less Routing tables Internet: DestinationGatewayFlagsRefs Use Netif Expire default195.5.5.203UGS 0 3347279ng1 Packets that must go through ng1 are going through ng0 kes# tcpdump -n -i ng0 src 92.113.72.242 tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode listening on ng0, link-type NULL (BSD loopback), capture size 96 bytes 21:54:42.971565 IP 92.113.72.242.33695 > 92.101.188.147.3870: R 0:0(0) ack 3977401380 win 0 21:54:43.027593 IP 92.113.72.242.40835 > 85.140.114.68.2800: R 0:0(0) ack 3996727808 win 0 21:54:43.235059 IP 92.113.72.242.40835 > 91.203.63.6.3808: R 0:0(0) ack 20527351 win 0 21:54:43.256561 IP 92.113.72.242.40835 > 193.109.129.226.2741: R 0:0(0) ack 1518499679 win 0 21:54:43.532925 IP 92.113.72.242.33718 > 94.25.61.243.50889: R 0:0(0) ack 3839853583 win 0 21:54:43.579555 IP 92.113.72.242.48509 > 82.170.130.251.59315: R 0:0(0) ack 2768802435 win 0 21:54:43.677122 IP 92.113.72.242.48509 > 212.75.197.168.1212: R 0:0(0) ack 3327449055 win 0 21:54:43.772060 IP 92.113.72.242.40835 > 80.240.220.152.53482: R 0:0(0) ack 299780238 win 0 21:54:43.774576 IP 92.113.72.242.40835 > 94.178.211.178.3358: R 0:0(0) ack 2300749243 win 0 21:54:43.884896 IP 92.113.72.242.33718 > 87.118.120.249.4667: R 0:0(0) ack 597152031 win 0 21:54:43.888057 IP 92.113.72.242.40835 > 90.189.39.28.4046: R 0:0(0) ack 407943006 win 0 And arriving through ng1 kes# tcpdump -n -i ng1 dst 92.113.72.242 tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode listening on ng1, link-type NULL (BSD loopback), capture size 96 bytes 21:55:02.965381 IP 85.113.139.248.12442 > 92.113.72.242.49197: S 3784250155:3784250155(0) win 65535 21:55:03.016658 IP 78.106.238.247.33710 > 92.113.72.242.40835: UDP, length 67 21:55:03.072568 IP 91.90.15.36.2451 > 92.113.72.242.39402: S 79361479:79361479(0) win 65535 21:55:03.385356 IP 93.135.205.93.4432 > 92.113.72.242.40835: S 1774379497:1774379497(0) win 32767 21:55:03.429475 IP 69.9.105.209.50863 > 92.113.72.242.40835: S 2727062150:2727062150(0) win 65535 21:55:03.537588 IP 94.158.32.107.3004 > 92.113.72.242.48509: S 1587739071:1587739071(0) win 16384 21:55:03.853375 IP 86.57.159.146.29687 > 92.113.72.242.40835: S 426526591:426526591(0) win 65535 21:55:04.187938 IP 81.88.114.216.44433 > 92.113.72.242.40835: UDP, length 67 21:55:04.209383 IP 79.140.170.10.56778 > 92.113.72.242.40835: S 124589897:124589897(0) win 64240 21:55:04.247917 IP 193.17.174.6.3893 > 92.113.72.242.33718: S 94220847:94220847(0) win 65535 21:55:04.315516 IP 89.109.14.126.1319 > 92.113.72.242.40835: S 2033078660:2033078660(0) win 65535 21:55:04.453367 IP 194.187.50.165.1681 > 92.113.72.242.40835: S 3973432781:3973432781(0) win 65535 21:55:04.638606 IP 78.45.120.164.17477 > 92.113.72.242.48509: UDP, length 103 kes# ipfw show 140082372149 allow ip from any to any 65535 0 0 deny ip from any to any It this BUG or I miss something? -- С уважением, KES mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
ambigious 'top' results
Здравствуйте, Questions. My system is overloaded, I run top to figure out which precess take time. In both cases CPU/WCPU I do not see which process take all the time. Which process take all processor time?? last pid: 24535; load averages: 3.86, 3.07, 3.07up 1+13:34:28 17:25:19 193 processes: 5 running, 187 sleeping, 1 stopped CPU: 95.1% user, 0.0% nice, 4.9% system, 0.0% interrupt, 0.0% idle Mem: 172M Active, 171M Inact, 97M Wired, 23M Cache, 60M Buf, 25M Free Swap: 2048M Total, 115M Used, 1933M Free, 5% Inuse PID USERNAMETHR PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPU COMMAND 2942 mysql42 40 52412K 22132K sbwait 0:00 22.80% mysqld 88534 root 1 -580 3288K 616K bpf 1:22 0.00% ipguard 89345 root 1 -580 3288K 632K bpf 1:20 0.00% ipguard 213 root 1 440 3180K 472K select 0:55 0.00% syslogd 709 bind 4 440 58480K 23996K select 0:42 0.00% named 4719 pgsql 1 440 42508K 1620K select 0:18 0.00% postgres last pid: 2982; load averages: 2.59, 3.37, 3.35up 1+13:23:39 17:14:30 196 processes: 5 running, 190 sleeping, 1 stopped CPU: 94.8% user, 0.0% nice, 3.4% system, 0.0% interrupt, 1.9% idle Mem: 129M Active, 168M Inact, 112M Wired, 11M Cache, 60M Buf, 68M Free Swap: 2048M Total, 119M Used, 1929M Free, 5% Inuse, 8K In PID USERNAMETHR PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIMECPU COMMAND 2942 mysql41 40 50748K 21240K sbwait 0:00 13.23% mysqld 2451 root 1 440 3532K 1924K RUN 0:01 0.10% top 2254 root 1 960 11380K 6988K RUN 3:12 0.00% bzip2 66162 root 1 440 9192K 2396K RUN 1:26 0.00% verlihub 88534 root 1 -580 3288K 616K bpf 1:21 0.00% ipguard 89345 root 1 -580 3288K 632K bpf 1:19 0.00% ipguard 213 root 1 440 3180K 472K select 0:54 0.00% syslogd 709 bind 4 440 58480K 23036K select 0:42 0.00% named 4719 pgsql 1 440 42508K 1620K select 0:18 0.00% postgres #systat -v 4 usersLoad 2.71 2.75 3.02 16 дек 17:21 Mem:KBREALVIRTUAL VN PAGER SWAP PAGER Tot Share TotShareFree in out in out Act 136916 11584 79968431004 29768 count All 190728 13620 297186863628 pages Proc:Interrupts r p d s w Csw Trp Sys Int Sof Flt 1656 cow2003 total 1 5 186 11k 7340 75k4 35k 7189 4198 zfodatkbd0 1 232 ozfod sio1 irq3 54.6%Sys 0.0%Intr 45.4%User 0.0%Nice 0.0%Idle 5%ozfod sio0 irq4 ||||||||||| daefr 4 ata0 irq14 ===>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4405 prcfr 1999 cpu0: time 34 dtbuf 6486 totfr Namei Name-cache Dir-cache 35373 desvn react Callshits %hits % 18913 numvn pdwak 96679420 97 47 0 8279 frevn pdpgs intrn Disks ad0 ad1 102212 wire KB/t 0.00 15.67 136888 act tps 0 5 230508 inact MB/s 0.00 0.07 24388 cache %busy 0 0 5384 free -- С уважением, KES mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Startup scipt
Здравствуйте, Questions.
It there feature (option in rc.subr) to run multiple services at once?
For example I have 'service'
to run service with specific flags I want to do:
service_enable="YES"
service_instances="instance1 instance2"
service_instance1_flags="-flag 1 rl0"
service_instance2_flags="-flag 2 rl2"
so rc.subr will run:
service -flag 1 rl0
service -flag 2 rl2
It will be great to have this feature that will do all dirty work to
run multiple services.
So maintainers of startup scripts will be free to not to do next things:
for interface in ${arpwatch_interfaces}; do
if [ ! -e "${arpwatch_dir}/arp.${interface}.dat" ]; then
if [ -e "${arpwatch_dir}/arp.${interface}.dat-" ]; then
cp "${arpwatch_dir}/arp.${interface}.dat-"
"${arpwatch_dir}/arp.${interface}.dat"
else
touch "${arpwatch_dir}/arp.${interface}.dat"
fi
fi
done
EXAMPLES:
ipguard_enable="YES"
ipguard_instances="rl0 rl1 rl2"
ipguard_rl0_interface="rl0" #NOTICE: this instance are runned without flags
ipguard_rl1_interface="rl1"
ipguard_rl1_flags="-r -b 100 -f /etc/ethers"
ipguard_rl2_interface="rl2"
ipguard_rl2_flags="-u 300 -xz"
proftpd_enable="YES"
proftpd_instances="external internal"
proftpd_external_flags="-c external.conf"
proftpd_internal_flags="-c ftp_for_localnet.conf"
I do not know will be or not feature to on/off some instance:
for example:
ipguard_rl2_enable="NO"
proftpd_external_enable="NO"
By default all instances are enabled because of if user add second
instance it has first one already runned. And he add second instance
because of it is not enough to have only one instance. So
proftpd_enable="YES" will enable all instances
proftpd_enable="NO" will disable all instances
proftpd_external_enable="NO" will disable some instance
For example: user run three instances, but now want to disable one of
them. So it write __enable="NO"
What do you think about this improvement?
--
С уважением,
KES mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re[4]: can not start SVNserve
Здравствуйте, Polytropon. Вы писали 14 декабря 2008 г., 15:11:35: P> On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 12:58:55 +0100 (CET), Wojciech Puchar P> wrote: >> > su: Sorry >> > >> > >> > kes# pw user mod svn -s /bin/bash >> > kes# pw user show svn >> > svn:*:1005:1005::0:0:SVN user:/nonexistent:/bin/bash >> > kes# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve start >> > Starting svnserve. >> > su: Sorry >> try to change directory to existent P> (1) What's /bin/bash? Check existing shell. P> (2) As you said: Check existing directory. P> (3) Regarding su, check for wheel group inclusion. home# uname -a FreeBSD home.kes.net.ua 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Tue Aug 12 02:11:24 EEST 2008 k...@kes.net.ua:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KES_KERN_v7 i386 home# pw user show svn svn:*:1003:1002::0:0:SVN user:/nonexistent:/usr/sbin/nologin As you can see on 'home' machine svn user has no valid shell also it has not valid home directory and it is not included into wheel group But svnserve is started and works fine. With same settings svnserve does not work on kes# uname -a FreeBSD kes.net.ua 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #: Sun Nov 23 17:19:12 EET 2008 k...@home.kes.net.ua:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KES_KERN_v7 i386 -- С уважением, KES mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re[2]: can not start SVNserve
Здравствуйте, David. I have home# uname -a FreeBSD home.kes.net.ua 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Tue Aug 12 02:11:24 EEST 2008 k...@kes.net.ua:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KES_KERN_v7 i386 on this machine sveserve startsup normally >My confusion comes from the output of PW home# pw user show svn svn:*:1003:1002::0:0:SVN user:/nonexistent:/usr/sbin/nologin pw is utility to edit /etc/master.passwd home# cat /etc/master.passwd | grep svn svn:*:1003:1002::0:0:SVN user:/nonexistent:/usr/sbin/nologin >showing me that user "svn" is a valid user 'svn' user is valid user >Have you tried changing the "svn" user shell to /bin/bash telling this: :/nonexistent:/usr/sbin/nologin I point that anyone can not use this user to login to system. But because of 'svn' is valid system user process can low his right to 'svn' user On this HOME machine when I try run svnserve it is runned despite on 'su svn' can not login me: home# su svn This account is currently not available. home# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve start Starting svnserve. home# ps ax|grep svn 34209 ?? Ss 0:00,00 /usr/local/bin/svnserve -d --listen-port=3690 -r /usr 34211 p0 S+ 0:00,00 grep svn But on other machine with same user I can not start svnserver kes# pw user show svn svn:*:1005:1005::0:0:SVN user:/nonexistent:/usr/sbin/nologin kes# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve start Starting svnserve. su: Sorry kes# pw user mod svn -s /bin/bash kes# pw user show svn svn:*:1005:1005::0:0:SVN user:/nonexistent:/bin/bash kes# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve start Starting svnserve. su: Sorry DW> Have you tried changing the "svn" user shell to /bin/bash and see if DW> your startup script is working. the differences between this machines only are next: home# svnserve --version svnserve, version 1.5.1 (r32289) compiled Aug 3 2008, 00:10:41 home# uname -a FreeBSD home.kes.net.ua 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Tue Aug 12 02:11:24 EEST 2008 k...@kes.net.ua:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KES_KERN_v7 i386 and kes# svnserve --version svnserve, version 1.5.2 (r32768) compiled Oct 8 2008, 21:55:55 kes# uname -a FreeBSD kes.net.ua 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #: Sun Nov 23 17:19:12 EET 2008 k...@home.kes.net.ua:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KES_KERN_v7 i386 DW> It would be helpful if you explained your system, setup, what you were DW> doing, and the results instead of simply showing us the output of a DW> couple of commands. It is hard to figure out exactly what you are DW> trying to do and what you have done. I try to run 'svnserve'. I just install svnserver and add user svn to run svnserve under. I do same things on 'kes' as on 'home' machine. Вы писали 14 декабря 2008 г., 7:22:39: DW> I'm a bit confused by what you're asking. I believe PW is a command DW> for editing groups and users on BSD, but I've never really used it. DW> My confusion comes from the output of PW. A typical user line has DW> seven fields, your output shows 11 fields. I am assuming that you're DW> showing me that user "svn" is a valid user. However, the shell is DW> setup to be /usr/sbin/nologin (which I assume is similar to setting DW> the shell to /etc/false). DW> Doing a "su svn" won't log you in becuase of the shell. I don't have DW> the /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve script in front of me, so I can't DW> tell you what it is doing, but I suspect that since the "su svn" DW> command doesn't work, the script also does a "su svn -c $command", and DW> that is failing since your "svn" user is set to the "nologin" shell. DW> Have you tried changing the "svn" user shell to /bin/bash and see if DW> your startup script is working. DW> At least, once you've changed your shell to "/bin/bash", you'll be DW> able to sign on as user "svn", and try to start up the "svnserve" DW> program manually. Then, we can determine if the problem is with DW> "svnserve" or with your startup script. DW> It would be helpful if you explained your system, setup, what you were DW> doing, and the results instead of simply showing us the output of a DW> couple of commands. It is hard to figure out exactly what you are DW> trying to do and what you have done. DW> In theory, your computer is doing exactly what you told it to do -- no DW> more, no less, and thus there is no problem. Everything is working DW> perfectly as programmed. DW> What we need to know is what you *WANTED* it to do. Then we can figure DW> out how to get your system setup to do just that. DW> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 3:13 AM, KES wrote: >> Здравствуйте, Users. >> >> What is wrong? >> kes# pw user show svn >> svn:*:1005:1005::0:0:S
Re[4]: bin/129027: ambigious output for top(1)
Здравствуйте, Remko. Вы писали 10 декабря 2008 г., 6:12:58: RL> Send questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] RL> Thnx RL> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone RL> Op 9 dec 2008 om 22:34 heeft KES <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> het volgende RL> geschreven:\ >> Здравствуйте, Remko. >> >> Вы писали 21 ноября 2008 г., 10:36:10: >> >> rFo> Synopsis: ambigious output for top(1) >> >> rFo> State-Changed-From-To: open->closed >> rFo> State-Changed-By: remko >> rFo> State-Changed-When: Fri Nov 21 08:36:09 UTC 2008 >> rFo> State-Changed-Why: >> rFo> This is not a PR, this is a user question, which has an anwer >> already. >> rFo> Thanks for reporthing this, though I will be closing the ticket. >> >> rFo> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=129027 >> man top >> .. >> >> -C Toggle CPU display mode. By default top displays the >> weighted >> CPU percentage in the WCPU column (this is the same >> value that >> ps(1) displays as CPU). Each time -C flag is passed >> it toggles >> between "raw cpu" mode and "weighted cpu" mode, >> showing the >> "CPU" or the "WCPU" column respectively. >> >> This is not descriptive enough. After reading this I have still have >> questions: >> 1. What is "weighted CPU percentage"? >> 2. What does "ps(1) display as CPU" >> >> ... >> (visible only on SMP systems), TIME is the number of system >> and user >> cpu seconds that the process has used, WCPU, when >> displayed, is the >> weighted cpu percentage (this is the same value that ps(1) >> displays as >> CPU), CPU is the raw percentage and is the field that is >> sorted to >> determine the order of the processes, and COMMAND is the >> name of the >> >> NOTICE: >> this will be better to describe one parameter per paragraph >> TIME the number of system and user cpu seconds that the >> process has used >> WCPU the weighted cpu percentage (average CPU usage by process >> per minute) >> CPU the momentary/instant? percentage of CPU usage by process >> (Default sorted by this column) >> COMMAND . >> >> >> 2. Here in both cases 0% idle. Neither CPU neither WCPU does not show >> processes which take all processor time. >> CPU: 92.2% user, 0.0% nice, 7.5% system, 0.4% interrupt, 0.0% idle >> Mem: 258M Active, 95M Inact, 112M Wired, 15M Cache, 60M Buf, 8516K >> Free >> Swap: 2048M Total, 748K Used, 2047M Free >> >> PID USERNAMETHR PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIMECPU >> COMMAND >> 4686 mysql38 40 54716K 25944K sbwait 9:11 15.28% >> mysqld >> 37959 root 1 960 15412K 12880K RUN 0:00 1.81% >> objcopy >> 37956 root 1 960 21692K 19152K RUN 0:02 0.93% cc1 >> 37911 root 1 440 3532K 2080K RUN 0:00 0.20% top >> 37957 root 1 -80 2912K 1236K piperd 0:00 0.05% as >> 37951 root 1 80 3496K 1312K wait 0:00 0.05% sh >> >> >> CPU: 93.7% user, 0.0% nice, 6.3% system, 0.0% interrupt, 0.0% idle >> Mem: 256M Active, 92M Inact, 111M Wired, 15M Cache, 60M Buf, 13M Free >> Swap: 2048M Total, 748K Used, 2047M Free >> Displaying WCPU >> PID USERNAMETHR PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPU >> COMMAND >> 4686 mysql38 40 54716K 25936K sbwait 9:11 20.31% >> mysqld >> 37996 root 1 960 13572K 10644K RUN 0:00 0.63% cc1 >> 37983 root 1 -80 3936K 1692K piperd 0:00 0.54% as >> 37911 root 1 440 3532K 2076K RUN 0:00 0.20% top >> 37997 root 1 -80 2912K 1004K piperd 0:00 0.05% as >> 212 root 1 440 3180K 980K select 7:40 0.00% >> syslogd >> 46720 root 1 440 9192K 4520K RUN 3:48 0.00% >> verlihub >> >> Can you answer, which? >> >> -- >> С уважением, >> KES mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> -- С уважением, KES mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
problems with pam_ldap - ssh and file attributes
Hi, I just suceeded to install and configure pam_ldap authentication on my 5.1Release box. Everything seems to work fine (ftp, telnet, samba, ...) except for ssh. Any attempt to login (as user whose account is defined in the LDAP directory) from a remote host using ssh end up with the error message: "Access denied". For users registered in /etc/passwd the ssh works fine. There is no problem when login via telnet, ftp works fine as well but the ssh doesn't. The /etc/pam.d/sshd looks like: # auth authrequiredpam_nologin.so no_warn authsufficient pam_opie.so no_warn no_fake_prompts authrequisite pam_opieaccess.so no_warn allow_local authsufficient pam_ldap.so debug try_first_pass authrequiredpam_unix.so no_warn try_first_pass # account account requiredpam_login_access.so account sufficient pam_ldap.so debug account requiredpam_unix.so # session session requiredpam_permit.so # password passwordsufficient pam_ldap.so debug passwordrequiredpam_unix.so no_warn try_first_pass -- Another problem is that commands like ls displays uid and gid as numbers for files owned by LDAP users. On the other hand ftp displays them correctly. Any ideas how to fix that (especially in case of ssh) would be really helpfull. Thanks Mira ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
installation doesn't work with USB keyboard
Hi! I have Dell Precision 650 with USB keyboard and I have problem with sysinstall during the installation of 5.1 Release. When the machine boots from the CD it responds to the keyboard (the menu that lets me select boot configuration works OK). Once the boot is finished and sysinstall gets started the keyboard is dead. Is there any option I can use during the boot from CD that would fix that (other than using PS2 keyboard)? Thanks Mira ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
