OpenLDAP 'container' objectClass

2005-08-03 Thread Kyle Mott

Hi.

I'm trying to get the container structural objectClass in 
openldap-server-2.2.27 (from ports) enabled, but I can't find any 
references to 'container' in the schema files. Am I just missing something?




-Kyle Mott
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: discarded oversize frames

2005-04-18 Thread Kyle Mott
Have you found a solution to this? I am having the same problems on a 
machine very recently updated (cvsupped + buildworld on 4/14/2005):
kernel.log:Feb 25 13:46:40 trinity kernel: rl0: discard oversize frame 
(ether type 3db4 flags 3 len 8381  max 1514)
kernel.log:Apr 10 14:27:37 trinity kernel: rl0: discard oversize frame 
(ether type 5a84 flags 3 len 2614  max 1514)
kernel.log:Apr 18 16:17:53 trinity kernel: rl0: discard oversize frame 
(ether type 1867 flags 3 len 16941  max 1514)

After the message, the machine becomes completely unresponsive and I 
have to do a power-off, power-on reset.


-Kyle

David Malone wrote:
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 10:00:34AM -0500, Jonathan Pater wrote:
 

fxp0: discard oversize frame (ether type 800 flags 3 len 1515  max
1514)
Is this something I should be
worried about, or is it indicative of something else faulty in the local
network setup?
   

This message is produced if the ethernet card receives a packet
that is bigger than permitted by the MTU + the size of the ethernet
header. For normal ethernet this means that packets should be =
1514 bytes.
So, there are three ways to eliminate the the message:
1) Find the machine sending oversize packets and stop it.
2) Change the MTU on your interface using ifconfig, this
will only work if the other machines on the network expect
larget frames.
3) You could edit /usr/src/sys/net/if_ethersubr.c and remove
the code that prints this error and then recompile your
kernel.
David.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Apache Signal 11

2005-03-17 Thread Kyle Mott
This just very recently started to happen (and I haven't upgraded Apache 
as of late either, or any other software for that matter). I keep 
getting this in my kernel.log on 2 different hosts:
Mar 17 09:34:16 logsrv pid 38069 (httpd), uid 0: exited on signal 11 
(core dumped)
Mar 17 00:34:25 g1bs0n kernel: pid 9419 (httpd), uid 0: exited on signal 
11 (core dumped)

Both hosts are running 'apache+mod_ssl-1.3.33+2.8.22' plus 
'php4-4.3.10', and a bunch of php modules that I don't want to list. i 
was able to get Apache running on g1bs0n by not starting ssl; however, 
Apache won't start on logsrv at all.

Looking up man signal, SIGSEGV (11) is a segmentation violation. What 
can cause this on 2 different machines that haven't been updated in a 
while? I'm currently running a ports-cvsup, to verify that 
apache+mod_ssl either does or does not need to be updated.


-Kyle Mott
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: can't reboot after messing up my rc.conf file

2005-02-16 Thread Kyle Mott
mount -a
vi /etc/rc.conf
Running fsck is your prerogative.

-Kyle Mott

aklist_061666 wrote:
Hi All:
I was editing my rc.conf file and left off a quote mark, and now when 
I try to reboot I get an error and am prompted to drop into shell to 
fix it.

The default prompt is /bin/sh, and if I hit return I get a prompt.
How can I edit the file while I'm in that prompt? VI doesn't work...is 
there another text editor I can use to fix the file?

TIA
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: HP NCxxxx NIC cards

2005-02-15 Thread Kyle Mott
We have a DL585 with dual Gigabit Broadcom NIC's on AMD64-5.3-RELEASE-p5 
(both of which are configured  in use):

bge0: Broadcom BCM5704C Dual Gigabit Ethernet, ASIC rev. 0x2100 mem 
0xf7fb-0xf7fb irq 25 at device 6.0 on pci2
miibus0: MII bus on bge0
brgphy0: BCM5704 10/100/1000baseTX PHY on miibus0
brgphy0:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX, 
1000baseTX-FDX, auto
bge0: Ethernet address: 00:0e:7f:b0:b2:bf
bge1: Broadcom BCM5704C Dual Gigabit Ethernet, ASIC rev. 0x2100 mem 
0xf7fa-0xf7fa irq 24 at device 6.1 on pci2
miibus1: MII bus on bge1
brgphy1: BCM5704 10/100/1000baseTX PHY on miibus1
brgphy1:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX, 
1000baseTX-FDX, auto
bge1: Ethernet address: 00:0e:7f:b0:b2:be

I'm not entirely sure which NC it is.

-Kyle Mott

Jerry McAllister wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know anything about NIC cards offered in the
HP 'Proliant' series - namely an:
HP NC7761 PCI Gigabit NIC (embedded)
or alternatively any of:
HP NC7771 PCI-X Gigabit Server Adapter 
HP NC7170 Dual Port PCI-X 1000T Gigabit Server Adapter 
HP NC 310F PCI-X Gigabit Server Adapter 
HP NC320T PCI Express Gigabit Server Adapter, 10/100/1000T 

Unfortunately none of them show up with those designations in
the supported hardware lists for either 4.11 or 5.3.   Do they
possibly fit in to one of the groups under a different name
that you know of?
One of our sites wants to buy one of these machines instead of
the ones we have usually been spec-ing for them.
Thanks,
jerry
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Digi PCI / XEM 16-Port

2004-08-23 Thread Kyle Mott
I have tried several times now to compile a GENERIC kernel on
4.10-STABLE with dgm0 (Digi Ports/16em, PCI version!) enabled, and have
had no luck. Can anyone give me pointers? Right now, it's not showing up
in dmesg (no errors, no warnings, nothing). The config line I have been
using is below (but it's the one straight out of LINT). I've done a lot
of googling and maillist searching; most of the documentation is for the
ISA version, and not the PCI version. I've tried chaning 'at isa?' to
'at pci?' with no luck.

 

My next guess would be to try 5.2.1, and then beyond that RedHat
(though, I would really like to avoid using RH).

 

 

device  dgm0at isa? port 0x104 iomem 0xd

  

 

 

 

-Kyle Mott 

  

 

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Rebuilding wtmp

2004-07-12 Thread Kyle Mott
Hi, I have several systems that report 'w' and 'who' wrong/corrupted:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# w
USER TTY  FROM  LOGIN@  IDLE WHAT
kyle p0   -31Dec69 - w
 
Obviously, Dec 31st 1969 is not right:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# date
Mon Jul 12 11:27:15 PDT 2004
 
I read a few manpages and did some google'ing, and couldn't find much of
anything about rebuilding wtmp. I tried just moving wtmp to wtmp.old and
then doing 'touch wtmp', then logging out and back in, but it still
reads 31Dec69. Is there some way to fix this? Thanks all.
 
(Note: Please CC me in any replies, I'm not a member of -questions).
 
 
 
-Kyle Mott
 
 
 
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Rebuilding wtmp

2004-07-12 Thread Kyle Mott

 -Original Message-
 From: aardvark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 4:40 PM
 To: Kyle Mott
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Rebuilding wtmp
 
 Kyle Mott disturbed my sleep to write:
  I read a few manpages and did some google'ing, and couldn't find
much of
  anything about rebuilding wtmp. I tried just moving wtmp to wtmp.old
and
  then doing 'touch wtmp', then logging out and back in, but it still
  reads 31Dec69. Is there some way to fix this? Thanks all.
 
 It's possible that there's some process holding open wtmp.  (You could
 check this by adding lsof (list open files) from ports -- *very*
handy
 to have around on general principle).  If this is the case, probably
 the easiest way to fix things would be to rename the file, touch wtmp,
 then reboot.
 

Thank's for the lsof tip, though I couldn't find anything using wtmp.
I've tried rebooting with an empty wtmp plenty of times before, all to
no avail.


 Interestingly enough, a Google for wtmp freebsd turned up this
message
 from the FreeBSD-Security list:
 
   http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/freebsd/2001-07/0055.html
 
 which suggests cp /dev/null /var/log/wtmp to fix things -- at least
on
 Solaris.
 

I tried this already, and it didn't work. On a system that I have a
good, uncorrupted version of wtmp, I can do 'mv wtmp wtmp.old  touch
wtmp', then logout and log back in, and it reports the dates fine. I can
also write a bunch of gibberish to wtmp (via /dev/random), and then
logout and back in, and it still reports the dates correctly. I'm just
confused.




-Kyle Mott



 I am now blessing your keyboard...
 
 --
 Saint Aardvark the Carpeted
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Because the plural of Anecdote is Myth.

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Rebuilding wtmp

2004-07-12 Thread Kyle Mott
Nevermind, I figured it out. I needed to rebuild ssh. Thanks everyone.

 
 
-Kyle Mott

 

 -Original Message-
 From: aardvark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 4:40 PM
 To: Kyle Mott
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Rebuilding wtmp
 
 Kyle Mott disturbed my sleep to write:
  I read a few manpages and did some google'ing, and couldn't find
much of
  anything about rebuilding wtmp. I tried just moving wtmp to wtmp.old
and
  then doing 'touch wtmp', then logging out and back in, but it still
  reads 31Dec69. Is there some way to fix this? Thanks all.
 
 It's possible that there's some process holding open wtmp.  (You could
 check this by adding lsof (list open files) from ports -- *very*
handy
 to have around on general principle).  If this is the case, probably
 the easiest way to fix things would be to rename the file, touch wtmp,
 then reboot.
 
 Interestingly enough, a Google for wtmp freebsd turned up this
message
 from the FreeBSD-Security list:
 
   http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/freebsd/2001-07/0055.html
 
 which suggests cp /dev/null /var/log/wtmp to fix things -- at least
on
 Solaris.
 
 I am now blessing your keyboard...
 
 --
 Saint Aardvark the Carpeted
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Because the plural of Anecdote is Myth.

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]