On Tuesday 12 October 2004 21:53, David Jenkins wrote:
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 21:26:55 +0300, Toomas Aas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi!
Lars H. Beuse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i want some apache NameVirtualHost behind a Paketfilter based on ipf,
placed in two subnets. This router has two Cards one in the private
net, one in the public. So far i just forward port 80 and 443 into my
private net 192.168.2.0, but every request ends up on apaches
rootlevel, NameVirtualHost directive is useless. So, how to forward
http(s):// requests through the Paketfilter matching the right
VirtualHost? Maybe i've thought in a wrong direction, so far. Just some
little hints should be enough.
I can't be 100% sure because I haven't done this kind of thing myself,
but I don't see why port forwarding should interfere with Apache's
name-based virtual hosting. After all, they operate on different layers
of the OSI model: port forwarding is purely TCP business while
VirtualHosts are HTTP.
[...]
Jepp, that's why i'am a bit confused. Cause unfiltered ApacheVirtualHosts
i run a few.
So i think i solved that issue:
That was my Virtual Host Container before it works:
NameVirtualHost www.domain.org:80
VirtualHost www.domain.org:80
blablabla
/Virtual
The Container that works:
NameVirtualHost 192.168.2.5:80
VirtualHost 192.168.2.5:80
blablabla
/Virtual
Thanx, for youre reply. But why is that? I'm not really shure.
So i will go deeper in that.
Ciao Lars
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
