Re: Ports on Macbook
The EULA states: This License will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California,.. Since I assume that Sweden has signed international commercial agreements with the USA, I think that it odes not matter what the Swedish law says about signing or not a license agreement, in this specific case the law of California applies. L. On Mar 3, 2009, at 13:29 , Bernt Hansson wrote: FBSD UG said the following on 2009-03-03 09:25: On 2 mrt 2009, at 20:22, Bernt Hansson wrote: FBSD UG skrev: You're not buying the software, you buy a license to use it on one Apple computer. Mostly semantics, if I name my computer APPLE Then it's legal to install. Crap, if I buy it I can install it on ANY computer. Does not have to be a computer named APPLE it could be IBM, HP or any other brand or non brand. did you sign all Swedish laws then? Kind of way, yes, since I voted in the election 2006 How is Apple going to prevent illegal copying? They have the copyright laws, as I stated before. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Ports on Macbook
On Mar 3, 2009, at 19:07 , Charles Oppermann wrote: On Tue March 3 2009 4:40:37 am Luigi Iannone wrote: The EULA states: This License will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California,.. Since I assume that Sweden has signed international commercial agreements with the USA, I think that it odes not matter what the Swedish law says about signing or not a license agreement, in this specific case the law of California applies. In a previous message, I posted the link to the license agreements Apple uses for Mac OS. There is a Swedish language version for Sweden which appears basically the same as the United States version, but says that the laws of Sweden would apply. Strange, in the english version is clearly stated that translations are provided in the sake of clarity but legally only the english one count. Luigi ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
module compile error
Hi all,
I'm trying to implement a freebsd module, but I'm blocked on the
following error:
When I try to compile my module, which has the following event handler
static int
module_event(module_t mod, int type, void *data)
{
int err = 0;
int s;
switch (type) {
case MOD_LOAD:
s = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, 0); /* THIS IS THE
ERROR...*/
#ifdef LISP_DEBUG
log(LOG_DEBUG, Module loaded );
#endif /* LISP_DEBUG */
break;
case MOD_UNLOAD:
#ifdef LISP_DEBUG
log(LOG_DEBUG, Module unloaded);
#endif /* LISP_DEBUG */
break;
default:
err = EINVAL;
break;
}
return err;
}
The compiler blocks with the error warning: implicit declaration of
function 'socket' . warning: nested extern declaration of
'socket'.
Any hint on what I do wrong?
If this is not the correct mailinglist I apologies, just let me know
where to send my question.
Thanks
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
About MBR
Hi all, Can you tell me if FreeBSD boot manager is able to manage darwin partitions? thanks --- The man who follows the crowd will usually get no further than the crowd. The man who walks alone is likely to find himself in places no one has ever been. (Alan Ashley-Pitt) Luigi Iannone - Laboratoire D'Informatique Paris 6 Address: 8, rue du Cap. Scott 75015 Paris (France) e.mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: +33 (0)1 44 27 71 28 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DHCP and ancontrol!
Hi, I have an Compaq laptop (2100ca model), I've installed FreeBSD 4.9! I'm starting to play with my Cisco Aironet 350 Series! I Know that DCHP and an work not so fine at bootstrap since the interface is not able to get the address. Not a problem I made a script! But each time that a to a change with ancontrol the interface doesn't work anymore. Each time I have to kill the dhclient and to restart it! But the worst think is that if a want to set an0 in this way ancontrol -i an0 -M 1 to enable monitor of 802.11, the DHCP stops work, even if I kill the process and restart it. Is this related to BPF Any known bug? Or just me? Thanks Luigi ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
