How to solve mysterious system lockups?
Hello I have several systems that are used as squid caching servers. I have some systems that use SCSI disks and some that use SATA disks. They are identical in everyway except for the sata vs SCSI drives. At random times, the sata based systems seem to be freezing. You can ping them and they respond, but you cannot log in. Nor are any logs processed during that time. I figure it mist be something to do with the disks, but I am not sure how to solve it. There seems to be little rhyme or reason. It does not happen necessarily during busy times. It can happen in the middle of the night. Any pointers in how to track down the cause would be much appreciated. Tyan S2881 Motherboard - 4gigs mem Using 4 SATA (or scsi) drives FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE. Thanks! Nicole ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD Devil Image
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Tue, 13 Mar 2007, Old Ranger wrote: > > > Believe it or not, I actually had an irate woman > complain to me about having a > > "devil" image on our church website. > > Nothing is more complete than the delusion > that beauty equals goodness. > > - Tolstoy I think it needs to be clarified that "beastie" is Not a devil. Beastie was aptly created to represent a Daemon. Simply correct them that it is not a devil or demon but a Daemon. >From Wikipedia: "Many people equate the word daemon with the word demon, implying some kind of Satanic connection between UNIX and the underworld. This is an egregious misunderstanding. Daemon is actually a much older form of demon; daemons have no particular bias towards good or evil, but rather serve to help define a person's character or personality. The ancient Greeks' concept of a personal daemon was similar to the modern concept of a guardian angel --- eudaemonia is the state of being helped or protected by a kindly spirit. As a rule, UNIX systems seem to be infested with both daemons and demons." (p403) Nicole The Large Print Giveth And The Small Print Taketh Away -- Anon ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Getting errors while trying to use new Mysql 50 port and pkg
Hello, I have 2 database servers running as slaves from a Master database. One (db2) is running FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE from October. The other, (db3) on a new build of FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE. Both are AMD64. Db2 is running mysql 5.0.24a and has been working fine. Db3 however, running mysql 5.0.33 keeps giving an error 127 after awhile, for a couple of our tables. The tables all check as ok. 070227 11:24:48 [ERROR] Got error 127 when reading table './user_info' We had this problem before with the ports built version on db2, but when we switched to the pkg build it went away. Now none of the build options seem to work and sadly I do not have the old copy of mysql 5.024a to try on this server. (forgot to use -K) I have tried the Ports build with and without various optimizations, the Pkg build and a downloaded binary from mysql. (5.0.27) All produced the errors within an hour of running. perror shows this to mean: MySQL error code 127: Record-file is crashed. When the error is reported, the query that caused it responds with an error, but all other queries work. Running a repair on the tables shows everything ok. Any suggestions greatly appreciated! Thanks! Nicole -- Free The Bound Periodicals! ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Determining daylight savings changes on BSD
--- Atom Powers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/2/07, John Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Friday 02 February 2007 17:35, Dan Nelson > wrote: > > > Upgrading to 5.5 or 6.2 will get you the new > tables as a side-effect of > > > the upgrade :) If you don't want to upgrade, > just install the > > > misc/zoneinfo port and rerun tzsetup. > > > > The last bit (rerunning tzsetup(8)) is good advice > for anyone who hasn't run > > it in a while. Upgrading from earlier versions of > FreeBSD will install the > > new tzdata files but it will not touch > /etc/localtime. > > > > That's great. Um, how can I run tzsetup > non-interactively? It's going > to be a pain updating all my systems if I have to > walk through the > menu on every one; and the man page didn't help at > all. > It's not what I would call, non interactive, or even elegant, but below is what I have done on some systems. On others, I just installed a copy of the newly created /etc/localtime file. Maybe it will be useful to you. cd /usr/src/share/zoneinfo fetch ftp://elsie.nci.nih.gov/pub/tzdata2007a.tar.gz tar -zxvf tzdata2007a.tar.gz make make install cp -f /usr/share/zoneinfo/America/Los_Angeles /etc/localtime chmod 444 /etc/localtime Nicole -- The significant problems we face cannot be solved by the same level of thinking that created them -Albert Einstein ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Dual Core Or Dual CPU - What's the real difference in performance?
--- Cy Schubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In message > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Nicole Harrington > wri > tes: > > --- Cy Schubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > In message > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mike > > > Meyer writes: > > > > Generally, more processors means things will > go > > > faster until you run > > > > out of threads. However, if there's some > shared > > > resource that is the > > > > bottleneck for your load, and the resource > doesn't > > > support > > > > simultaneous access by all the cores, more > cores > > > can slow things > > > > down. > > > > > > > > Of course, it's not really that simple. Some > > > shared resources can be > > > > managed so as to make things improve under > most > > > loads, even if they > > > > don't support simultaneous access. > > > > > > Generally speaking the performance increase is > not > > > linear. At some point > > > there is no benefit to adding more processors. > In a > > > former life when I was > > > an MVS systems programmer the limit was seven > > > processors in a System/370. > > > Today we can use 16, 32, even 64 processors with > a > > > standard operating > > > system and current hardware, unless one of the > > > massively parallel > > > architectures is used. > > > > > > To answer the original posters question, there > are > > > architectural > > > differences mentioned here, e.g. shared cache, > I/O > > > channel, etc., but the > > > reason the chip manufacturers make them is that > > > they're more cost effective > > > than two CPUs. > > > > > > The AMD X2 series of chips (I have one), they're > not > > > truely a dual > > > processor chip. They're analogous to the single > > > processor System/370 with > > > an AP (attached processor) in concept. What this > > > means is that both > > > processors can execute all instructions and are > just > > > as capable in every > > > way except external interrupts, e.g. I/O > interrupts, > > > are handled by the > > > processor 0 as only that processor is "wired" to > be > > > interrupted in case of > > > external interrupt. I can't comment about > Intel's > > > Dual Core CPUs as I don't > > > know their architecture but I'd suspect the same > > > would be true. Chips in > > > which there are two dual core CPUs on the same > die, > > > I believe one of each > > > of the dual core CPUs can handle external > > > interrupts. > > > > Wow I love ansking questions without too many > > specifics as I learn so much more. With this > however > > it really seems to be a love hate relationship > with > > dual core. > > > > Based on what you stated above, would that mean > that > > when using a dual core system, using polling > interupts > > might be better or perhaps monumanally worse? > > No. CPU 0 would be interrupted. It would schedule > the interrupt in the > queue. Either CPU could service the interrupt once > the interrupt was queued. > > Some devices need to be polled as they do not > generate interrupts or they > generate spurious interrupts. Otherwise allowing a > device to interrupt the > CPU is more efficient as it allows the CPU to do > other work rather than > spinning its wheels polling. This is the Von Neumann > model. > > > -- > Cheers, > Cy Schubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > FreeBSD UNIX: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Web: > http://www.FreeBSD.org > > e**(i*pi)+1=0 > Yes, I have heard that, thanks. However, how does one know or tell which is the right mode/model for which devices? I have seen people on either side (poll vs interupt) claim one is better or much like an infomercial, just do blah and your system will be so much faster. Altho of course that would be the pro polling side, since by default, interupts are used. Is it all just imperical testing? Take this pill and see let me know how you feel? It seems as though when it's heavy networking, use polling. Otherwise stick with interupts. I have even heard when using X network card, use polling. How would know when one card will do better with polling while another may not? Thanks for helping me understand the debate better. Nicole --- If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; but if you really make them think, they'll hate you." -- Don Marquis ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Can't get make buildworld to work with recent cvsup. - Addl
--- Garrett Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nicole Harrington wrote: > > Something setup wrong some place?? > > > > cd /usr/src/lib ; make > > > > . > > c -pg -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe > -march=opteron > > -I/usr/src/lib/libftpio > > -Wall -DINET6 -c /usr/src/lib/libftpio/ftpio.c -o > > ftpio.po > > cc -pg -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe > -march=opteron > > -I/usr/src/lib/libftpio > > -Wall -DINET6 -c ftperr.c -o ftperr.po > > building profiled ftpio library > > ranlib libftpio_p.a > > cc -fpic -DPIC -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe > > -march=opteron > > -I/usr/src/lib/libftpio -Wall -DINET6 -c > > /usr/src/lib/libftpio/ftpio.c > > -o > > ftpio.So > > cc -fpic -DPIC -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe > > -march=opteron > > -I/usr/src/lib/libftpio -Wall -DINET6 -c ftperr.c > -o > > ftperr.So > > building shared library libftpio.so.6 > > gzip -cn /usr/src/lib/libftpio/ftpio.3 > > ftpio.3.gz > > ===> libgeom (all) > > cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=opteron > > -I/usr/src/lib/libgeom > > -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W > > -Wno-unused-parameter > > -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes > > -Wpointer-arith > > -Wno-uninitialized -c > > /usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_getxml.c > > cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=opteron > > -I/usr/src/lib/libgeom > > -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W > > -Wno-unused-parameter > > -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes > > -Wpointer-arith > > -Wno-uninitialized -c > > /usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_stats.c > > cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=opteron > > -I/usr/src/lib/libgeom > > -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W > > -Wno-unused-parameter > > -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes > > -Wpointer-arith > > -Wno-uninitialized -c > > /usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_xml2tree.c > > /usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_xml2tree.c:255: error: > > syntax error before > > '*' token > > /usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_xml2tree.c:256: warning: > > type qualifiers > > ignored on > > function return type > > /usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_xml2tree.c:256: warning: > > return type defaults > > to `int' > > /usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_xml2tree.c:256: warning: > > function declaration > > isn't a > > prototype > > /usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_xml2tree.c: In function > > `CharData': > > /usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_xml2tree.c:260: error: > > `userData' undeclared > > (first > > use in this function) > > /usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_xml2tree.c:260: error: > (Each > > undeclared > > identifier is > > reported only once > > /usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_xml2tree.c:260: error: > for > > each function it > > appears > > in.) > > /usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_xml2tree.c:262: error: > `s' > > undeclared (first > > use in > > this function) > > /usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_xml2tree.c:263: error: > `len' > > undeclared > > (first use in > > this function) > > /usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_xml2tree.c: In function > > `geom_xml2tree': > > /usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_xml2tree.c:286: error: > > syntax error before > > "parser" > > /usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_xml2tree.c:296: error: > > `parser' undeclared > > (first use > > in this function) > > /usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_xml2tree.c:296: warning: > > implicit declaration > > of > > function `XML_ParserCreate' > > /usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_xml2tree.c:301: warning: > > implicit declaration > > of > > function `XML_SetUserData' > > /usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_xml2tree.c:302: warning: > > implicit declaration > > of > > function `XML_SetElementHandler' > > /usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_xml2tree.c:303: warning: > > implicit declaration > > of > > function `XML_SetCharacterDataHandler' > > /usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_xml2tree.c:304: warning: > > implicit declaration > > of > > function `XML_Parse' > > /usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_xml2tree.c:307: warning: > > implicit declaration > > of > > function `XML_ParserFree' > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/src/lib/libgeom. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/src/lib. > > > > > > ARGG!! > > > >Nicole > > Doesn't look like it's compiling libgeom or geom > related dependencies. > What's your /etc/make.conf look like and what > version are you trying to > compile with buildworld? Actually.. That seems to be happening with even no /etc/make.conf I even copied the /usr/src from another older server that built fine to this server (same server type) and it fails in the same way. It's just driving me crazy. Nicole Nicole > -Garrett > ___ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Can't get make buildworld to work with recent cvsup. - Addl
Something setup wrong some place?? cd /usr/src/lib ; make . c -pg -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=opteron -I/usr/src/lib/libftpio -Wall -DINET6 -c /usr/src/lib/libftpio/ftpio.c -o ftpio.po cc -pg -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=opteron -I/usr/src/lib/libftpio -Wall -DINET6 -c ftperr.c -o ftperr.po building profiled ftpio library ranlib libftpio_p.a cc -fpic -DPIC -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=opteron -I/usr/src/lib/libftpio -Wall -DINET6 -c /usr/src/lib/libftpio/ftpio.c -o ftpio.So cc -fpic -DPIC -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=opteron -I/usr/src/lib/libftpio -Wall -DINET6 -c ftperr.c -o ftperr.So building shared library libftpio.so.6 gzip -cn /usr/src/lib/libftpio/ftpio.3 > ftpio.3.gz ===> libgeom (all) cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=opteron -I/usr/src/lib/libgeom -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wno-uninitialized -c /usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_getxml.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=opteron -I/usr/src/lib/libgeom -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wno-uninitialized -c /usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_stats.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=opteron -I/usr/src/lib/libgeom -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wno-uninitialized -c /usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_xml2tree.c /usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_xml2tree.c:255: error: syntax error before '*' token /usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_xml2tree.c:256: warning: type qualifiers ignored on function return type /usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_xml2tree.c:256: warning: return type defaults to `int' /usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_xml2tree.c:256: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype /usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_xml2tree.c: In function `CharData': /usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_xml2tree.c:260: error: `userData' undeclared (first use in this function) /usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_xml2tree.c:260: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once /usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_xml2tree.c:260: error: for each function it appears in.) /usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_xml2tree.c:262: error: `s' undeclared (first use in this function) /usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_xml2tree.c:263: error: `len' undeclared (first use in this function) /usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_xml2tree.c: In function `geom_xml2tree': /usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_xml2tree.c:286: error: syntax error before "parser" /usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_xml2tree.c:296: error: `parser' undeclared (first use in this function) /usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_xml2tree.c:296: warning: implicit declaration of function `XML_ParserCreate' /usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_xml2tree.c:301: warning: implicit declaration of function `XML_SetUserData' /usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_xml2tree.c:302: warning: implicit declaration of function `XML_SetElementHandler' /usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_xml2tree.c:303: warning: implicit declaration of function `XML_SetCharacterDataHandler' /usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_xml2tree.c:304: warning: implicit declaration of function `XML_Parse' /usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_xml2tree.c:307: warning: implicit declaration of function `XML_ParserFree' *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/lib/libgeom. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/lib. ARGG!! Nicole The Large Print Giveth And The Small Print Taketh Away -- Anon ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Dual Core Or Dual CPU - What's the real difference in performance?
--- Cy Schubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In message > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mike > Meyer writes: > > Generally, more processors means things will go > faster until you run > > out of threads. However, if there's some shared > resource that is the > > bottleneck for your load, and the resource doesn't > support > > simultaneous access by all the cores, more cores > can slow things > > down. > > > > Of course, it's not really that simple. Some > shared resources can be > > managed so as to make things improve under most > loads, even if they > > don't support simultaneous access. > > Generally speaking the performance increase is not > linear. At some point > there is no benefit to adding more processors. In a > former life when I was > an MVS systems programmer the limit was seven > processors in a System/370. > Today we can use 16, 32, even 64 processors with a > standard operating > system and current hardware, unless one of the > massively parallel > architectures is used. > > To answer the original posters question, there are > architectural > differences mentioned here, e.g. shared cache, I/O > channel, etc., but the > reason the chip manufacturers make them is that > they're more cost effective > than two CPUs. > > The AMD X2 series of chips (I have one), they're not > truely a dual > processor chip. They're analogous to the single > processor System/370 with > an AP (attached processor) in concept. What this > means is that both > processors can execute all instructions and are just > as capable in every > way except external interrupts, e.g. I/O interrupts, > are handled by the > processor 0 as only that processor is "wired" to be > interrupted in case of > external interrupt. I can't comment about Intel's > Dual Core CPUs as I don't > know their architecture but I'd suspect the same > would be true. Chips in > which there are two dual core CPUs on the same die, > I believe one of each > of the dual core CPUs can handle external > interrupts. Wow I love ansking questions without too many specifics as I learn so much more. With this however it really seems to be a love hate relationship with dual core. Based on what you stated above, would that mean that when using a dual core system, using polling interupts might be better or perhaps monumanally worse? > I > have a mortgage so spending money on computers is > not a high priority in > relation to that priority but dual core does give me > an opportunity to > enter the market relatively inexpensively and get > good value for the money > I spend on the technology. That's really what it's > all about, how much > performance you get for the money you spend. > Tring to figure out the fud from reality is often the best way to make sure you really get the best value. However, it always seems to "depend" on many variables :) Thanks! Nicole > -- > Cheers, > Cy Schubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > FreeBSD UNIX: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Web: > http://www.FreeBSD.org > > e**(i*pi)+1=0 > > > ___ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Can't get make buildworld to work with recent cvsup.
This seems to be my week for problems. I installed onto a 2 CPU AMD system FreeBSD 6.2-REL amd64 Disk. cvsupped and tried to make buildworld. Any suggestions appreciatted. Thanks Nicole /usr/src/lib/libncurses/../../contrib/ncurses/ncurses/tinfo/MKnames.awk /usr/src/lib/libncurses/../../contrib/ncurses/include/Caps awk -f /usr/src/lib/libncurses/../../contrib/ncurses/ncurses/tinfo/MKnames.awk /usr/src/lib/libncurses/../../contrib/ncurses/include/Caps cat namehdr boolnames boolfnames numnames numfnames strnames strfnames nameftr > names.c AWK=awk sh /usr/src/lib/libncurses/../../contrib/ncurses/include/MKncurses_def.sh /usr/src/lib/libncurses/../../contrib/ncurses/include/ncurses_defs > ncurses_def.h sed MKterm.h.awk -e "/@NCURSES_MAJOR@/s%%5%" -e "/@NCURSES_MINOR@/s%%2%" -e "/@NCURSES_CONST@/s%%const%" -e "/@NCURSES_XNAMES@/s%%1%" awk -f MKterm.h.awk /usr/src/lib/libncurses/../../contrib/ncurses/include/Caps > term.h.new sh /usr/src/lib/libncurses/../../contrib/ncurses/include/edit_cfg.sh /usr/src/lib/libncurses/ncurses_cfg.h term.h.new ** edit: HAVE_TCGETATTR 1 ** edit: HAVE_TERMIOS_H 1 ** edit: HAVE_TERMIO_H 0 ** edit: BROKEN_LINKER 0 mv -f term.h.new term.h cc -o make_keys -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=opteron -I. -I/usr/src/lib/libncurses -I/usr/src/lib/libncurses/../../contrib/ncurses/ncurses -I/usr/src/lib/libncurses/../../contrib/ncurses/include -Wall -DFREEBSD_NATIVE -DNDEBUG -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DTERMIOS /usr/src/lib/libncurses/../../contrib/ncurses/ncurses/tinfo/make_keys.c /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lc *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/lib/libncurses. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Dual Core Or Dual CPU - What's the real difference in performance?
Hello all, I have been building/using servers that were dual CPU AMD Opteron systems for some time. (usually 246 Opteron cpu's) Now of course the world is shifting to Dual Core. Using FreeBSD, what is really the difference, besides power and ability to shove in more memory, between having the two seperate CPUS's? What if I did 2, Dual Core cpu's? Would the SMP overhead and sharing to a [Giant Locked] disk and or network erase any benefits? Thanks! Nicole The Large Print Giveth And The Small Print Taketh Away -- Anon ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Problem with Serverworks HT1000 serial ATA support - Tyan S3992 Motherboard
--- Mike Tancsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 10:18 PM 2/6/2007, Nicole Harrington wrote: > > > > > I use RELENG_6 in i386 mode on this MB (two > > > integrated em nics) and it > > > works quite well > > > > Have you tried it with the tune for Diskd > mentioned. > > No, > But I have a box scheduled to be put > together tomorrow and > will give it a try. How much RAM do you have on > them ? > > > ---Mike Ok - I have done more tests and it gets more odd. I was running actually 6.2-PreRelease. To see if something was fixed, I setup a new disk with a fresh install of 6.2-RELEASE amd64. Now even without the sysctl modifications I can reboot the server with: bonnie++ -d /home -u root -s1g Tyan S3992 Mb with a 2210 CPU and 4Gigs Ram. Western Digital Raptor WD740ADFD Error on console: Tons of ones like these zoom by. g_vfs_done():ad4s1a[READ(offset=172627162, Length=626729(] error=6 This is true under P-ATA or S-ATA. Nicole ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Problem with Serverworks HT1000 serial ATA support - Tyan S3992 Motherboard
--- Mike Tancsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 6 Feb 2007 15:26:27 -0800 (PST), in > sentex.lists.freebsd.questions you wrote: > > If I run: bonnie++ -d /home -u root s1g > > The system reboots. > > > > I have tried this is both S-ATA and P-ATA > emulation. > >atapci0: > port > >0xb080-0xb087,0xb000-0xb003,0xac00-0xac07 > >,0xa880-0xa883,0xa800-0xa81f mem > 0xff4fe000-0xff4f > >irq 11 at device 14.0 on pci1 > > > >S-ATA: > >ad4: 70911MB at > >ata2-master SATA150 > > > > OR > >P-ATA: > >ad4: DMA limited to UDMA33, device found non-ATA66 > >cable > >ad4: 70911MB at > >ata2-master UDMA33 > I use RELENG_6 in i386 mode on this MB (two > integrated em nics) and it > works quite well Have you tried it with the tune for Diskd mentioned. > atapci0: > port > 0xc080-0xc087,0xc000-0xc003,0xbc00-0xbc07,0xb880-0xb883,0xb800-0xb81f > mem 0xff > 3fe000-0xff3f irq 11 at device 14.0 on pci1 > ata2: on atapci0 > ata3: on atapci0 > ata4: on atapci0 > ata5: on atapci0 > atapci1: > port > 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xffa0-0xffaf at > device 2.1 on > pci0 > ata0: on atapci1 > ata1: on atapci1 > > ad4: 76319MB at > ata2-master SATA150 > > # atacontrol list > ATA channel 0: > Master: no device present > Slave: no device present > ATA channel 1: > Master: no device present > Slave: no device present > ATA channel 2: > Master: ad4 Serial ATA II > Slave: no device present > ATA channel 3: > Master: no device present > Slave: no device present > ATA channel 4: > Master: no device present > Slave: no device present > ATA channel 5: > Master: no device present > Slave: no device present > > > However, update the BIOS and make sure you dont use > PATA emulation on > the SATA controller as that doesnt really work. > > ---Mike > > Mike Tancsa, Sentex communications > http://www.sentex.net > Providing Internet Access since 1994 > [EMAIL PROTECTED], (http://www.tancsa.com) Hi Mike Yes, it does work quite well. But not if I use the same tuning parameters used on systems running on Non Serverworks chipsets. (Tyan S2881 or S2882 Board) I use these for supporting many heavy loaded Squid servers. The normal tweaks suggested for Squid, and work well on Non Serverworks chipsets are: /boot/loader.conf kern.ipc.maxsockets=16424 kern.ipc.msgmnb=16384 kern.ipc.msgmni=41 kern.ipc.msgseg=2049 kern.ipc.msgssz=64 kern.ipc.msgtql=2048 OR kern.ipc.msgmnb=8192 kern.ipc.msgmni=40 kern.ipc.msgseg=512 kern.ipc.msgssz=64 kern.ipc.msgtql=1024 However, with any setting of kern.ipc.msgtql (What does it do anyway?) above 64 the server crashes with the Bonnie test. The higher the setting the faster the crash. Nicole ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
