Re: Missing man pages: gnupg
gnupg's binary is gpg2, and man gpg2 exists. :) Daniel Underwood wrote: Coming from Linux, I'm accustomed to using gpg. I installed the gnupg port (which I assume is virtually the same as Linux gpg). Doing $ man gnupg returns nothing. Doing $ which gnupg reveals that the port (or at least the binary) is in fact installed. But where are the gnupg man pages? If truly not installed, how can I install them? In general, how does one deal with missing man pages? One reason I left Linux (*officially* yesterday) is fragmented documentation. So this is extremely important to me. TIA, Daniel ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Secure apache with php
Just build www/apache22 with WITH_MPM=itk and you'll have it. :) Then add something like this in each vhost: IfModule mpm_itk_module AssignUserId my_user my_group /IfModule Nicolas Letellier wrote: Le Thu, 09 Jul 2009 14:36:11 +0200, Julien Cigar jci...@ulb.ac.be a écrit : When I tested php in cgi, performances were bad. That's why, php_mod is better (in my case != It's not CGI, it's FastCGI. There is no performance loss if you use an opcode cacher (like x-cache). And is anyboy use mpm-itk ? I'm interested more with this solution than another php fix (like safe_mode, open_basedir or cgi/fastcie). signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: the yes comand
Matthew Seaman wrote: Kurt Buff wrote: On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 16:06, Vasadi I. Claudiu Florin claudiu.vas...@gmail.com wrote: Well , I noticed that, but it's a bit odd now isn't it. I mean, what's the sense of having some darn letter printer out forever ? I found it kind of silly If you ask me. But, incredibly useful if you actually write shell scripts - many programs want a 'y' for input from the stdin, and this will do that for you. Here's an example. When upgrading FreeBSD, especially over a large delta in version numbers, you will frequently need to delete old files etc. that are no longer part of the base system. You are provided with a mechanism to do that, viz: # cd /usr/src # make check-old {prints out all old files, directories and libraries to be deleted} # make delete-old {prompts you to delete anything apart from shlibs which it won't touch} However 'make delete-old' will ask you whether you want to delete each and every individual file, which is tedious. If you decide from your inspection of the 'make check-old' output that you don't want any of the old files, you can just run: # yes | make delete-old Job done. Cheers, Matthew Or you can also do: # make BATCH_DELETE_OLD_FILES=YES delete-old ;) signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature