Re: fw.sh question
I installed freebsd 4.5 and am trying to use a firewall rules set to load upon bootup. I put a file called fw.sh in /usr/local/etc/rc.d/ but it doesn't load up when I restart. I got the impression that all .sh files in this folder are supposed to load up. Yes, they're supposed to load up. Perhaps try 'chmod 755 fw.sh'. Can you execute it after boot ? Any ideas? I am logged in as root. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AMD64 Woes
That's exactly the problem. The BIOS won't let me. And the AC line is plugged in. Windows XP Pro detects it correctly, there's something something else going on with BSD. -Original Message- From: Phil Brennan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 2:33 AM To: Remi Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: AMD64 Woes Just force the cpu speed to high in your bios setup. On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 19:46:22 -0700, Remi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just got a new AMD64 laptop(I8254) and it appears to be running at 800MHz on 5.2.1-R CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3200+ (800.03-MHz K8-class CPU) I have no idea how to fix this! Would upgrading to -CURRENT help at all? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AMD64 Mobile CPU scaling
I just got an AMD64 laptop and I'm having a problem with CPU(auto) scaling. Its running 5.2.1 and it looks like it running at 800MHz, is it possible to scale this up to full speed? And how? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AMD64 Woes
I just got a new AMD64 laptop(I8254) and it appears to be running at 800MHz on 5.2.1-R CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3200+ (800.03-MHz K8-class CPU) I have no idea how to fix this! Would upgrading to -CURRENT help at all? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AMD64 vs i386 for FreeBSD
Well I just got an email back from the manufacturer of the AMD64 laptop I wanted to buy. Im not sure how it works when switching 64 to i386, but they say it's not supported in the BIOS(I assume this is where it is suppose to be changed) So now I come to a cross roads: 1. Buy a 1.7 Centrino 2. Buy a P4 2.8GHz w/ HT 3. Buy the AMD64 laptop What is the state of the AMD64 version of BSD? Other than that im leaning toward the 1.7GHz Centrino, but I hear a lot of problems with FreeBSD working right with Centrino, is this correct? What are the issues? -Original Message- From: Brooks Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 6:29 AM To: Kenneth Culver Cc: Michal Pasternak; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Remi; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; David O'Brien Subject: Re: AMD64 vs i386 for FreeBSD On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 06:03:52PM -0400, Kenneth Culver wrote: So far my athlon 64 3200+ has been one of the coolest running processors I've ever owned... although I've never used it in a laptop, my friend's p4 2.8 is running a lot hotter... Yes, current AMD64 CPUs are fairly lower power even without the low-power models. We're seeing 1U dual Opteron boxes running at less then 100F under load. -- Brooks -- Any statement of the form X is the one, true Y is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AMD64 vs i386 for FreeBSD
Just to clarify exactly what you mean. I can the x86 version of BSD with no changes to the BIOS, jumpers or anything on an AMD64? Sorry in advanced if this is a stupid question, Ive never dealt with anything but x86 -Original Message- From: Kenneth Culver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 7:31 AM To: Remi Cc: 'Brooks Davis'; 'Michal Pasternak'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'David O'Brien' Subject: RE: AMD64 vs i386 for FreeBSD Quoting Remi [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Well I just got an email back from the manufacturer of the AMD64 laptop I wanted to buy. Im not sure how it works when switching 64 to i386, but they say it's not supported in the BIOS(I assume this is where it is suppose to be changed) So now I come to a cross roads: 1. Buy a 1.7 Centrino 2. Buy a P4 2.8GHz w/ HT 3. Buy the AMD64 laptop What is the state of the AMD64 version of BSD? Other than that im leaning toward the 1.7GHz Centrino, but I hear a lot of problems with FreeBSD working right with Centrino, is this correct? What are the issues? It runs OK, with some minor nits compared to x86 version. I'm not sure what the laptop maker is talking about... but if you boot the x86 version of FreeBSD, it'll work. I think they meant you can't switch from amd64 to x86 after already booting an OS. Ken ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AMD64 vs i386 for FreeBSD
See that's I'm thinking, the raw performance is very attractive to me!! So what's this about a p4 1.7 outperforming a 2.8? You got link to benchmarks? -Original Message- From: Daniel O'Connor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 26, 2004 8:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Remi; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: AMD64 vs i386 for FreeBSD -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:30, David O'Brien wrote: I have a choice between AMD64 3200+ and a P4 2.8GHz with HT. Which one would you guys recommend to run FreeBSD. Obviously the i386 would be easier to run, so I guess my question is what is the state of the AMD64 FreeBSD version? You do know you can run FreeBSD/i386 on the Athlon64 3200+ laptop, right? :-) A 3200+ running 32-bit FreeBSD will out-perform the P4 2.8GHz running the same OS. A Pentium-M 1.7Ghz will outperform a 2.8Ghz P4 too ;) If battery life is important to you I'd suggest not getting an AMD64. For raw performance it's pretty nice though :) - -- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from. -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA3j2V5ZPcIHs/zowRAoZpAKCnZMb/Kxk9wElcBhktj9NPDPsPggCgh6b2 iasKpu5F998wHLaC5flWA+E= =QBEE -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AMD64 vs i386 for FreeBSD
Hello, Im in the market for a new laptop. Right now I'm looking at HyperSonic laptops. I have a choice between AMD64 3200+ and a P4 2.8GHz with HT. Which one would you guys recommend to run FreeBSD. Obviously the i386 would be easier to run, so I guess my question is what is the state of the AMD64 FreeBSD version? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wine-20040309 broken?
%uname -a FreeBSD node2 5.2.1-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p4 #5: Mon Mar 29 16:09:11 PST 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BART i386 Hello, I am having major problems with wine. I will receive an Abort error on every exe I attempt to execute, example: %wine /opt/wine/c/Iris405Demo.exe Abort Has anyone experienced this problem or know how to fix it. I have no CFLAGS, CXXFLAGS, CPUTYPE defined The .EXE's all have 777 permissions. Ports CVSuped Mar 29. Assume the root of the problem lies with (what is signal 6?): %ldd /usr/local/bin/wine /usr/local/bin/wine: /usr/local/bin/wine: signal 6 Heres my wine.conf: WINE REGISTRY Version 2 [Drive C] Path = /opt/wine/c Type = hd [wine] Windows = c:\\windows System = c:\\windows\\system Path = c:\\windows;c:\\windows\\system Profile = c:\\windows\\Profiles\\Administrator GraphicsDriver = x11drv ShowDirSymlinks = 1 ShowDotFiles = 1 ShellLinker = wineshelllink # [wineconf] [Version] Windows = win98 DOS = 6.22 [DllOverrides] oleaut32 = builtin, native ole32= builtin, native comdlg32 = builtin, native shell32 = builtin, native shfolder = builtin, native shlwapi = builtin, native shdocvw = builtin, native advapi32 = builtin, native msvcrt = native, builtin mciavi.drv = native, builtin mcianim.drv = native, builtin msi = native, builtin *notepad.exe = native, builtin C:\\windows\\regedit.exe = native, builtin * = builtin, native [x11drv] AllocSystemColors = 100 PrivateColorMap = N PerfectGraphics = N UseDGA = Y UseXVidMode = Y UseXRandR = Y UseTakeFocus = Y DXGrab = N DesktopDoubleBuffered = N [fonts] Resolution = 96 Default = -adobe-helvetica- DefaultFixed = fixed DefaultSerif = -adobe-times- DefaultSansSerif = -adobe-helvetica- [FontDirs] [ppdev] [Debug] [registry] LoadGlobalRegistryFiles = Y LoadHomeRegistryFiles = Y LoadWindowsRegistryFiles = Y WritetoHomeRegistryFiles = Y SaveOnlyUpdatedKeys = Y [Tweak.Layout] WineLook = Win95 [Clipboard] ClearAllSelections = 0 PersistentSelection = 1 UsePrimary = 0 [afmdirs] 1 = /usr/share/ghostscript/fonts 2 = /usr/share/a2ps/afm 3 = /usr/share/enscript 4 = /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1 [WinMM] Drivers = wineoss.drv ; default for most common configurations WaveMapper = msacm.drv MidiMapper = midimap.drv [dsound] [Network] [AppDefaults\\_INS0432._MP\\x11drv] Desktop = 640x480 [AppDefaults\\_INS0466._MP\\x11drv] Desktop = 640x480 [AppDefaults\\_INS0576._MP\\x11drv] Desktop = 640x480 [AppDefaults\\_INS5176._MP\\x11drv] Desktop = 640x480 [AppDefaults\\_INS5576._MP\\x11drv] Desktop = 640x480 # [/wineconf] And finally ls output of /opt/wine/c: %ls -R /opt/wine/c/ Iris405Demo.exe windows /opt/wine/c/windows: Profilessystem /opt/wine/c/windows/Profiles: Administrator /opt/wine/c/windows/Profiles/Administrator: /opt/wine/c/windows/system: ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Dictionary......
Have you looked at Barnes Noble or Borders? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Denis Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2003 9:28 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Dictionary.. Hi All!!! I need your help! Does anybody know where i can take a dictionary which support about 3-5 languages there are: english, german, french, and may be russian... -- Best regards, Denis [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendmail WOES
FreeBSD FreeBSD5.kicks-ass.net 5.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE #2: Fri Jun 27 14:49:55 PDT 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/LAPTOP i386 I am currently trying to get sendmail working to submit my first port but its not working(nearest I can tell). I am using pr-new to submit it, but it doesnt show up on the PR web site. Any hellp is greatly appreciated. I start sendmail by: sendmail -L sm-mta -bd -q30m /etc/mail/access: 127.0.0.1 OK FreeBSD.ORG OK hotmail.com OK charter.net RELAY freebsd5.kicks-ass.net RELAY /etc/mail/* - every other file is default. Note local-host-name is missing cat /var/log/maillog: Aug 19 13:25:31 laptop sendmail[2804]: h7JKPVSp002804: from=root, size=3078, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aug 19 13:25:31 laptop sm-mta[2805]: h7JKPVvj002805: from=[EMAIL PROTECTED], size=3327, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=[EMAIL PROTECTED], proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=localhost [127.0.0.1] Aug 19 13:25:31 laptop sendmail[2804]: h7JKPVSp002804: [EMAIL PROTECTED], ctladdr=root (0/0), delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay, pri=30213, relay=[127.0.0.1] [127.0.0.1], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (h7JKPVvj002805 Message accepted for delivery) Aug 19 13:25:32 laptop sm-mta[2807]: h7JKPVvj002805: to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], ctladdr=[EMAIL PROTECTED] (0/0), delay=00:00:01, xdelay=00:00:01, mailer=esmtp, pri=30462, relay=mx1.freebsd.org. [216.136.204.125], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (Ok: queued as 23B6643F75) --- I am completely clueless on what to do. Any help is greatly appreicated. Please note itll stay queued forever. Thanks in advance for your help _ bGet MSN 8/b and help protect your children with advanced parental controls. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/parental ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PSM not working in 5.0-R
i have a Sony VAIO GRX570 running FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE and my mouse doesnt work I'm in a complete daze as to why it's not working. The only information i can provide is i DO have "device psm" in my kernel, and default device.hints. Any help would be greatly appreciated! -RemiSTOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
4.7-RC error
my /etc/cvsupfile: . tag=RELENG_4 .. src-all During a kernel build of 4.7-RC, wheni execute make depend i recieve the following error: rm -f .depend mv -f .newdep .depend cd ../../modules ; env MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/usr/src/sys/compile/Build_2/modules MACHINE=i386 make obj ; env MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/usr/src/sys/compile/Build_2/modules MACHINE=i386 make depend === accf_data /usr/src/sys/modules/accf_data/../../conf/kmod.mk, line 63: Could not find bsd.init.mk /usr/src/sys/modules/accf_data/../../conf/kmod.mk, line 190: Could not find bsd.links.mk make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue *** Error code 1 _ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
