No new snapshot of 5-CURRENT anymore?
Hello there. Sometimes I'm trying new snapshots of 5-CURRENT from ftp://current.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/i386/ on my box. The latest snapshot of 5-CURRENT there is 5.2-CURRENT-20040710-JPSNAP now; i.e. there was no new snapshot for about a month. May it be some problem of the building machine? According to the build logs from ftp://current.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/i386/log/ there always was the same problem until today: cc -O -pipe -I. -DIN_GCC -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DPREFIX=\"/usr\" -I/usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/../cc_tools -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/../cc_tools -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/../../../../contrib/gcc -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/../../../../contrib/gcc/config -DGENERATOR_FILE -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/legacy/usr/include -L/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/legacy/usr/lib -o genattrtab genattrtab.o rtl.o print-rtl.o bitmap.o gensupport.o ggc-none.o read-rtl.o insn-conditions.o genautomata.o varray.o min-insn-modes.o libiberty.a -lm /usr/lib/libm.so: undefined reference to `__isnanl' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status Does somebody know when building of the snapshots will be reconditioned? Thanks __ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
i386 assembly language question
I thought that I found a typo in the arch-handbook and I wrote about that to the freebsd-doc mailing list. You can read that email at http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040117005106.21558.qmail I didn't get any response yet. Maybe I'm missing something and this isn't a typo? What is "posh" instruction? :-)) __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
GCC 3.4.0 and FreeBSD base distibution
Hello everebody. As you can see at http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/index.html the GNU project is preparing to release their next major release version of GCC. There is a list of changes this release will implement. You can read it at http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/changes.html My question is about the first change that is declared in that list: GNU Make is now required to build GCC Does it mean that GNU Make will be a part of FreeBSD base distribution or GCC will be patched so it can be build by the standard (IEEE Std 1003.1) make? As far as I know FreeBSD's make conforms to this standard, almost. Thanks __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Error during restarting syslogd in FreeBSD 5.2-RELEASE
Hello I have FreeBSD 5.2-RELEASE installed on my old Pentium system. Look at following log please: localhost# /etc/rc.d/syslogd restart Stopping syslogd. ps: kvm_getprocs: No such process Starting syslogd. What is 'kvm_getprocs' and why I get this error message? Is it a bug? Thanks __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it! http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Error during restarting syslogd in FreeBSD 5.2-RELEASE
> I have FreeBSD 5.2-RELEASE installed on my old Pentium system. Look > at > following log please: > > localhost# /etc/rc.d/syslogd restart > Stopping syslogd. > ps: kvm_getprocs: No such process > Starting syslogd. > > > What is 'kvm_getprocs' and why I get this error message? Is it a bug? Same behavior during restarting inetd: localhost# /etc/rc.d/inetd restart Stopping inetd. ps: kvm_getprocs: No such process Starting inetd. __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it! http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Error during restarting syslogd in FreeBSD 5.2-RELEASE
--- Dan Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In the last episode (Jan 29), Rostislav Krasny said: > > > I have FreeBSD 5.2-RELEASE installed on my old Pentium system. > Look > > > at > > > following log please: > > > > > > localhost# /etc/rc.d/syslogd restart > > > Stopping syslogd. > > > ps: kvm_getprocs: No such process > > > Starting syslogd. > > > > > > > > > What is 'kvm_getprocs' and why I get this error message? Is it a > bug? > > > > Same behavior during restarting inetd: > > > > localhost# /etc/rc.d/inetd restart > > Stopping inetd. > > ps: kvm_getprocs: No such process > > Starting inetd. > > It sounds like rc.subr is not redirecting ps errors to /dev/null when > shutting down services. Should I send PR about this problem or maybe it was already fixed in CURRENT? __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it! http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
moderator approval in moderated FreeBSD mailing list
Hello At Sun, 08 Feb 2004 16:38:31 +0200 I sent an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Because this is a moderated mailing list my email is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. Either the message will get posted to the list, or I will receive notification of the moderator's decision. That is what written on the auto-reply email I got immediately after I sent my email. Already elapsed more than 22 hours but my email isn't posted and I didn't receive any notification about moderator's decision. How long time it would take yet? Can I become a member of some FreeBSD mailing list but not receive emails from this list or receive only replies to my emails in that list? Thanks ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
[Fwd: Re: 5.2.1-RC floppy install: many if_X.ko modules failed to load]
Members of freebsd-current mailing list are probably too busy, so I'm forwarding my question to more dynamic freebsd-questions mailing list. Is my guess about the /src/release/Makefile right or wrong? BTW when 5.2.1-RC2 is going to be released? I saw few cvs commits with preparation to this release. Thanks Original Message Subject: Re: 5.2.1-RC floppy install: many if_X.ko modules failed to load Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2004 16:38:31 +0200 From: Rostislav Krasny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Rostislav Krasny wrote: Hello. When I boot from the installation floppies of 5.2.1-RC, at the beginning of sysinstall is starting I get a window on the blue background with following error message on it: Loading module if_pcn.ko failed AMD Am79c79x PCI ethernet card then next window with the same error message: Loading module if_vr.ko failed VIA VT3043/VT86C100A Rhide PCI ethernet card and so on about if_ste.ko, if_xl.ko, if_ed.ko, if_bge.ko, if_re.ko, if_wb.ko, if_rl.ko, if_sis.ko, if_dc.ko, if_bfe.ko, if_aue.ko, if_fxp.ko and if_sf.ko modules. Previously I successfully installed FreeBSD 5.2-RELEASE from the floppies. Now, when I'm trying to install FreeBSD 5.2.1-RC by the same way, I'm geting the above error messages, so I'm forbearing to continue this installation. This problem is always repeatable, even after I made the floppies on different diskettes. This system doesn't have any AMD or VIA chip on it. Could it be a result of revision 1.825.2.2 of the /src/release/Makefile that adds a 'strip -x' run on the kernel modules on the mfsroot floppy? Original Message Subject: Re: 5.2.1-RC floppy install: many if_X.ko modules failed to load Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2004 14:04:41 + (UTC) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lowell Gilbert) > [my very first email, skipped] It looks like miibus is having some sort of problem: the modules that complain are all dependent on it. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Is it a bug
Hello. I didn't use FreeBSD with SMB much, so I'm not sure it is a bug or not. When I run 'smbutil lookup smth' it works well but 'smbutil view //smth' and 'smbutil lc' produce error messages: $ smbutil lookup moon Warning: no cfg file(s) found. Got response from 192.168.1.3 IP address of moon: 192.168.1.3 $ smbutil view //moon smbutil: smb_lib_init: can't find kernel module $ smbutil view //192.168.1.3 smbutil: smb_lib_init: can't find kernel module $ smbutil lc smbutil: smb_lib_init: can't find kernel module Is it a bug or I'm missing something? Man page of 'smbutil' doesn't tell me anything that can help answer this question. This is a fresh 5.2.1-RC2 system installed from FTP. Thanks ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
[bsdinstall] Precise disk slicing
Hi, Previously in the sysinstall there was possible to define the start and the end LBA addresses of the new slice (new MBR partition). I didn't find how to do that in the bsdinstall. Is it possible? Thank you ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
PPPoE and troubles with TCP
Hello I have Alcatel Speedtouch Home ADSL modem. I use PPPoE protocol for connection with my Internet Service Provider (ISP) through this ADSL modem. I use FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE and ppp (a.k.a. user-ppp) for this. In the /etc/ppp/ppp.conf file I have ' set MRU 1492' and ' set MTU 1492' options. This is because the maximum MTU one can use with PPPoE is 1492 according to RFC 2516. I have no problems with "dialing" to my ISP. But after the PPPoE connection is established I have troubles with TCP connections to some hosts. For example I can't go to hhtp://www.ssh.com/ but to http://www.freebsd.org/ or http://www.gnu.org/ I can. If I run 'telnet www.ssh.com 80' and enter HTTP request according to HTTP 1.1 or 1.0 protocol I don't get any answer. If I enter just 'GET /' I get some short answer. 'GET /' is an HTTP request according to the old HTTP 0.9 version of the protocol and it is rarely used today. But the problem is not HTTP, I think. If I do HTTP request according to HTTP 1.1 from my friends' computer I do have some long answer. Furthermore if I change the MRU and MTU to 1484 or smaller I have no problem with www.ssh.com. So it looks like TCP packet overflow or something like that. Besides FreeBSD I have Windows 98 Second Edition in my computer. I use PPPoE with Win98SE too. I use RASPPPOE driver fo it, go to http://www.raspppoe.com/ for more information. I have no problems with www.ssh.com when I use Win98SE with this impimentation of PPPoE protocol. I have MTU == 1492 set by default in RASPPPOE. I don't get error messages about fragmentation when I run 'ping -f -l 1464 www.ssh.com' in my Win98SE (ICMP+IP=1464+28=1492). Why in FreeBSD I cannot use MTU == 1492 without problems with some hosts like www.ssh.com ? How to fix it in FreeBSD? P.S. ping have different syntax in Windows, so don't be wondered about -f flag. -f sets "no fragmentation" flag in IP headers of all outgoing packets. __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Re: PPPoE and troubles with TCP
--- Stacey Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2002-12-26 at 12:26, Rostislav Krasny wrote: > > Hello > > > > I have Alcatel Speedtouch Home ADSL modem. I use PPPoE protocol for > > connection with my Internet Service Provider (ISP) through this ADSL > > modem. I use FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE and ppp (a.k.a. user-ppp) for this. In > > the /etc/ppp/ppp.conf file I have ' set MRU 1492' and ' set MTU 1492' > > options. This is because the maximum MTU one can use with PPPoE is 1492 > > according to RFC 2516. I have no problems with "dialing" to my ISP. But > > after the PPPoE connection is established I have troubles with TCP > > connections to some hosts. For example I can't go to > > hhtp://www.ssh.com/ but to http://www.freebsd.org/ or > > http://www.gnu.org/ I can. If I run 'telnet www.ssh.com 80' and enter > > HTTP request according to HTTP 1.1 or 1.0 protocol I don't get any > > answer. If I enter just 'GET /' I get some short answer. 'GET /' is an > > HTTP request according to the old HTTP 0.9 version of the protocol and > > it is rarely used today. But the problem is not HTTP, I think. If I do > > HTTP request according to HTTP 1.1 from my friends' computer I do have > > some long answer. Furthermore if I change the MRU and MTU to 1484 or > > smaller I have no problem with www.ssh.com. So it looks like TCP packet > > overflow or something like that. > > Besides FreeBSD I have Windows 98 Second Edition in my computer. I use > > PPPoE with Win98SE too. I use RASPPPOE driver fo it, go to > > http://www.raspppoe.com/ for more information. I have no problems with > > www.ssh.com when I use Win98SE with this impimentation of PPPoE > > protocol. I have MTU == 1492 set by default in RASPPPOE. I don't get > > error messages about fragmentation when I run 'ping -f -l 1464 > > www.ssh.com' in my Win98SE (ICMP+IP=1464+28=1492). Why in FreeBSD I > > cannot use MTU == 1492 without problems with some hosts like > > www.ssh.com ? How to fix it in FreeBSD? > > > > P.S. ping have different syntax in Windows, so don't be wondered about > > -f flag. -f sets "no fragmentation" flag in IP headers of all outgoing > > packets. > > I use ADSL here on my site, but not that modem. How do you connect to > that device from the FBSD box? I configured my ADSL modem to work with PPPoE. Then I changed the /etc/ppp/ppp.conf file to this one: /etc/ppp/ppp.conf default: set log Phase Chat LCP IPCP CCP tun command ident user-ppp VERSION (built COMPILATIONDATE) set device PPPoE:ed0 set speed sync # set MRU 1484 # set MTU 1484 set MRU maximum 1492 set MTU maximum 1492 set timeout 0 set urgent none# no priorities enable dns # request DNS info (for resolv.conf) disable ipv6 ipv6cp disable shortseq protocomp acfcomp vjcomp deflate pred1 mppe denyshortseq protocomp acfcomp vjcomp deflate pred1 mppe myisp: set authnameusername@ISPstring set authkey password add default HISADDR # Add a (sticky) default route /etc/ppp/ppp.conf The hostname of my box can be resolved through /ets/hosts , so I don't need any kind of 'set ifaddr' in /etc/ppp/ppp.conf file. ed0 is the ethernet NIC my ADSL modem is connected to. Many lines of the "default:" section of the ppp.conf file are not critical. The only ones you need are these: set device PPPoE:ed0 set MRU maximum 1492 set MTU maximum 1492 enable dns See `man 8 ppp` for more information. __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Re: PPPoE and troubles with TCP
--- Stacey Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2002-12-26 at 13:16, Rostislav Krasny wrote: > > --- Stacey Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 2002-12-26 at 12:26, Rostislav Krasny wrote: > > > > Hello > > > > > > > > I have Alcatel Speedtouch Home ADSL modem. I use PPPoE protocol for > > > > connection with my Internet Service Provider (ISP) through this > ADSL > > > > modem. I use FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE and ppp (a.k.a. user-ppp) for > this. In > > > > the /etc/ppp/ppp.conf file I have ' set MRU 1492' and ' set MTU > 1492' > > > > options. This is because the maximum MTU one can use with PPPoE is > 1492 > > > > according to RFC 2516. I have no problems with "dialing" to my ISP. > But > > > > after the PPPoE connection is established I have troubles with TCP > > > > connections to some hosts. For example I can't go to > > > > hhtp://www.ssh.com/ but to http://www.freebsd.org/ or > > > > http://www.gnu.org/ I can. If I run 'telnet www.ssh.com 80' and > enter > > > > HTTP request according to HTTP 1.1 or 1.0 protocol I don't get any > > > > answer. If I enter just 'GET /' I get some short answer. 'GET /' is > an > > > > HTTP request according to the old HTTP 0.9 version of the protocol > and > > > > it is rarely used today. But the problem is not HTTP, I think. If I > do > > > > HTTP request according to HTTP 1.1 from my friends' computer I do > have > > > > some long answer. Furthermore if I change the MRU and MTU to 1484 > or > > > > smaller I have no problem with www.ssh.com. So it looks like TCP > packet > > > > overflow or something like that. > > > > Besides FreeBSD I have Windows 98 Second Edition in my computer. I > use > > > > PPPoE with Win98SE too. I use RASPPPOE driver fo it, go to > > > > http://www.raspppoe.com/ for more information. I have no problems > with > > > > www.ssh.com when I use Win98SE with this impimentation of PPPoE > > > > protocol. I have MTU == 1492 set by default in RASPPPOE. I don't > get > > > > error messages about fragmentation when I run 'ping -f -l 1464 > > > > www.ssh.com' in my Win98SE (ICMP+IP=1464+28=1492). Why in FreeBSD I > > > > cannot use MTU == 1492 without problems with some hosts like > > > > www.ssh.com ? How to fix it in FreeBSD? > > > > > > > > P.S. ping have different syntax in Windows, so don't be wondered > about > > > > -f flag. -f sets "no fragmentation" flag in IP headers of all > outgoing > > > > packets. > > > > > > I use ADSL here on my site, but not that modem. How do you connect to > > > that device from the FBSD box? > > > > I configured my ADSL modem to work with PPPoE. Then I changed the > > /etc/ppp/ppp.conf file to this one: > > > > /etc/ppp/ppp.conf > > default: > > set log Phase Chat LCP IPCP CCP tun command > > ident user-ppp VERSION (built COMPILATIONDATE) > > > > set device PPPoE:ed0 > > set speed sync > > # set MRU 1484 > > # set MTU 1484 > > set MRU maximum 1492 > > set MTU maximum 1492 > > set timeout 0 > > set urgent none# no priorities > > enable dns # request DNS info (for > > resolv.conf) > > disable ipv6 ipv6cp > > disable shortseq protocomp acfcomp vjcomp deflate pred1 > > mppe > > denyshortseq protocomp acfcomp vjcomp deflate pred1 > > mppe > > > > myisp: > > set authnameusername@ISPstring > > set authkey password > > add default HISADDR # Add a (sticky) default route > > /etc/ppp/ppp.conf > > > > The hostname of my box can be resolved through /ets/hosts , so I don't > > need any kind of 'set ifaddr' in /etc/ppp/ppp.conf file. ed0 is the > > ethernet NIC my ADSL modem is connected to. > > > > Many lines of the "default:" section of the ppp.conf file are not > critical. > > The only ones you need are these: > > > > set device PPPoE:ed0 > > set MRU maximum 1492 > > set MTU maximum 1492 > >
Re: PPPoE and troubles with TCP
--- Stacey Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2002-12-26 at 14:41, Rostislav Krasny wrote: > > --- Stacey Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 2002-12-26 at 13:16, Rostislav Krasny wrote: > > > > --- Stacey Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 2002-12-26 at 12:26, Rostislav Krasny wrote: > > > > > > Hello > > > > > > > > > > > > I have Alcatel Speedtouch Home ADSL modem. I use PPPoE protocol > for > > > > > > connection with my Internet Service Provider (ISP) through this > > > ADSL > > > > > > modem. I use FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE and ppp (a.k.a. user-ppp) for > > > this. In > > > > > > the /etc/ppp/ppp.conf file I have ' set MRU 1492' and ' set MTU > > > 1492' > > > > > > options. This is because the maximum MTU one can use with PPPoE > is > > > 1492 > > > > > > according to RFC 2516. I have no problems with "dialing" to my > ISP. > > > But > > > > > > after the PPPoE connection is established I have troubles with > TCP > > > > > > connections to some hosts. For example I can't go to > > > > > > hhtp://www.ssh.com/ but to http://www.freebsd.org/ or > > > > > > http://www.gnu.org/ I can. If I run 'telnet www.ssh.com 80' and > > > enter > > > > > > HTTP request according to HTTP 1.1 or 1.0 protocol I don't get > any > > > > > > answer. If I enter just 'GET /' I get some short answer. 'GET > /' is > > > an > > > > > > HTTP request according to the old HTTP 0.9 version of the > protocol > > > and > > > > > > it is rarely used today. > > > > > > > > Many lines of the "default:" section of the ppp.conf file are not > > > critical. > > > > The only ones you need are these: > > > > > > > > set device PPPoE:ed0 > > > > set MRU maximum 1492 > > > > set MTU maximum 1492 > > > > enable dns > > > > > > > > See `man 8 ppp` for more information. > > > > > > > > > > Dude, > > > I wasn't asking for assistance.., rather I was hoping to provide > > > some help in response to your post.. :-) > > > > > > The reason why I asked about how you connect to your ADSL modem is > > > because if its ethernet, then there is no need to use ppp. > > > > > > But if there's a case-requirement why you need to use ppp, then fair > > > enough. > > > > > > Let me know either way, okay? > > > > Yes, my computer is connected to my ADSL modem by Ethernet. > > What is the way to connect with the ISP without PPP? > > Is it ethernet bridging with DHCP? My ADSL Service Provider (Bezeq) > > does not support this. Moreover, the use of ethernet bridging is > > inconvenient for me because I can't switch the ISP by myself. > > When I use PPP, over Ethernet or over whatever else, I have ISP string, > > so it is very easy to switch the ISP I'd like to use at the moment. > > > > P.S. What about my main question? > > > > Hi, > I didn't really have to configure *anything* as such to establish > connectivity on FreeBSD. The router I have holds the configurations > requried in order to authenticate to the ISP's upstream router. > > All I have to do from FreeBSD's view is configure the external interface > to use the router as the default route (using ifconfig or > /stand/sysinstall). That's it. So, your FreeBSD box is within your LAN and have do dial with ADSL at all, only your router have. Your box have internal LAN's IP 192.168.1.8 and your router configured to do network address and port translation. This network configuration is completely different from my one. I have a modem, not a router. > As your initial problems, what happens if you set mtu to 1500 (or *not* > define this?)? Here's what man ppp says: > set mtu [max[imum]] [value] > The default MTU is 1500. At negotiation time, ppp will > accept > whatever MRU the peer requests (assuming it's not less than > 296 > bytes or greater than the assigned maximum). If the MTU is > set, > ppp will not accept MRU values less than value. When > negotia- > tions are complete, the MTU i
RE: PPPoE and troubles with TCP
--- Sten_Daniel_Sørsdal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Have you remembered to setup anything to fix the MSS in TCP packets > going through? RASPPPOE in my Win98SE have such option enabled by default. It's described there to solve problem with ICS (Internet Connection Sharing). I don't see any difference when it is disabled or enabled. RASPPPOE works just good with MTU == 1492 in my Win98SE. However my FreeBSD in the same box have troubles with TCP when I use PPPoE with MTU == 1492. The configuration of TCP MSS in my FreeBSD is default, I didn't change it. > You have disabled encryption and compression right? Yes, all types of compression and encryption are disabled, see my previous post with /etc/ppp/ppp.conf there. P.S. PPPoE use 8 bytes in each ethernet packet this is the reason why 1492 is the maximum MTU with PPPoE. I found that MTU == 1484 solve my problem, read my previous posts. But, 1484 = 1492 - 8 ! It looks like double PPPoE usage or lack of correspondence to the standard of PPPoE protocol described in RFC 2516. Maybe PPPoE implementation in FreeBSD have a bug? __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Re: X11/xterm Unicode woes
> About a month ago UTF-8 locale stopped working in my xterm. I experience the same problem after the xterm port had been updated from 206 to 210 version. As a workaround you can either: downgrade to xterm-206 or use uxterm. I'm suspecting following change of xterm-209: amend change for loading utf8Fonts resource from patch #204 to allow an ISO-8859-1 "normal" font to be combined with an ISO-10646 font if the latter is given via the -fw option or its corresponding resource value. But I'm not sure. I've already contacted with Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, the xterm author, and sent him a trace file of manually built xterm-212. I hope he will localize and fix the bug before the next xterm release. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
