Re: can't update system.
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Scot Hetzel wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 12:29 PM, keneasson wrote: >> I did a pkg_delete for both libiconv and libxul in the hope that this would >> clear any stale depends from firefox2 days causing me these problems. >> > : >> #cd ../../devel/libtool22 >> local# make >> ===> libtool-2.2.6b depends on file: /usr/local/lib/liul/libxul.so - not >> found >> ===> Verifying install for /usr/local/lib/libxul/libxul.so in >> /usr/ports/www/libxul > > libtool22 has no dependencies, this points to something in your > environment is causing the GECKO port to be included as a dependency. > Check your /etc/make.conf, and/or /usr/local/etc/ports.conf (if using > ports-mgmt/portconf) for USE_GECKO. > Also check these files for WANT_GECKO. dv8t01# pwd /usr/ports/devel/libtool22 dv8t01# make -V LIB_DEPENDS dv8t01# make -V LIB_DEPENDS WANT_GECKO=libxul cairo.2:/usr/ports/graphics/cairo jpeg.10:/usr/ports/graphics/jpeg nspr4:/usr/ports/devel/nspr nss3:/usr/ports/security/nss png.5:/usr/ports/graphics/png Xft.2:/usr/ports/x11-fonts/libXft iconv.3:/usr/ports/converters/libiconv atk-1.0.0:/usr/ports/accessibility/atk glib-2.0.0:/usr/ports/devel/glib20 gtk-x11-2.0.0:/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/gtk20 IDL-2.0:/usr/ports/devel/libIDL pango-1.0.0:/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/pango Scot ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
(no subject)
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 12:29 PM, keneasson wrote: > I did a pkg_delete for both libiconv and libxul in the hope that this would > clear any stale depends from firefox2 days causing me these problems. > : > #cd ../../devel/libtool22 > local# make > ===> libtool-2.2.6b depends on file: /usr/local/lib/libxul/libxul.so - not > found > ===>Verifying install for /usr/local/lib/libxul/libxul.so in > /usr/ports/www/libxul libtool22 has no dependencies, this points to something in your environment is causing the GECKO port to be included as a dependency. Check your /etc/make.conf, and/or /usr/local/etc/ports.conf (if using ports-mgmt/portconf) for USE_GECKO. Scot ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: can't update system.
On 1/12/10, keneasson wrote: > Hi thanks for the reply. > I'm worried that changing WITH_GECKO will try and rebuild firefox2 which is > marked IGNORE. It took me a long time to get that resolved. > > Here is a bit of my portmaster -a log, it's pretty clear that there is a > dependency loop. > > portmaster -a > pormasterbuild.log > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libintl.so.8" not found, required by > "pg_config" > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libiconv.so.3" not found, required by > "httpd" > [: -le: argument expected > > ... I would suggest you check the /var/db/pkg/libiconv*/+CONTENTS file to see if it contains any extra dependencies. The begining of my libiconv*/+CONTENTS file only contains this: @comment PKG_FORMAT_REVISION:1.1 @name libiconv-1.13.1 @comment ORIGIN:converters/libiconv @cwd /usr/local man/man1/iconv.1.gz @comment MD5:5c4f3aa5c04f006466355e377b1a2560 : There should be no @pkgdep or @comment DEPORIGIN lines in this file. If you have these in there, then remove them as libiconv has no dependencies. Scot ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: can't update system.
On 1/12/10, Erik Trulsson wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 09:45:35PM +0600, keneasson wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Forgive cross posting, i have an unusable system and an not sure where to > post. > > This follows up a more lengthy post, but i've got some new info so again. > > > > libxul requiers libiconv > > libiconv requires libxul > > > libiconv does not require libxul AFAICT. > > > > > i have WITH_GECKO=libxul in make.conf > > That is likely what is causing your problems. > Remove that line and see if things work better. > WITH_GECKO doesn't cause any additional dependencies to be defined for the libiconv port. Only when USE_GECKO or WANT_GECKO are defined (see /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk), then WITH_GECKO will be used to choose the appropriate GECKO port. Scot ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Attempting ZFS Only Install of 7.2
2009/7/17 Drew Tomlinson : >> 4. Install FreeBSD from copy of install CD to ZFS. I used sysinstall with >> custom >> options (Install Root and Media Type) > > I am stuck at this point. I have my zpool mounted at /zpool in the FixIt > environment. Then I exit FixIt and choose "Custom" from sysinstall. I set > appropriate "Options". Next I select my distributions. Finally I hit > "Commit" but systinstall complains that I haven't labeled any disks. What > step am I missing? > Just follow these steps to install FreeBSD from the Fixit environment: http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFSOnRootWithZFSboot#installFreeBSD Scot ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Xorg upgrade desaster: Xlib: extension "Generic Event Extension" missing on display ":0.0".
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 5:28 AM, O. Hartmann
wrote:
> Scot Hetzel wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 6:39 PM, O. Hartmann
>> wrote:
>>
>>> build-process, but I doubt this. I did a 'ldd' on the Firefox3 binary
>>> and I got the attached dump of the linked shared objects.
>>> Interestingly, the first three entries show up something missing -
>>> therefore I deinstalled Firefox and rebuild the browser after an
>>> additional rebuild of libxcb (via portupgrade -rf). Previously, all Xorg
>>>
>>
>>
>>> thor# ldd firefox-bin
>>> firefox-bin:
>>>libxul.so => not found (0x0)
>>>libmozjs.so => not found (0x0)
>>>libxpcom.so => not found (0x0)
>>>libplds4.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libplds4.so.1 (0x80063e000)
>>>libplc4.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libplc4.so.1 (0x80076f000)
>>>
>>
>> When firefox3 was first added to the ports collection, I had noticed
>> this problem with firefox3 (after using sysutils/libchk), but I didn't
>> have this problem with the firefox 2. A look at the difference
>> between the www/firefox and www/firefox3 Makefiles showed that
>> firefox3 was missing this:
>>
>> LDFLAGS+= -Wl,-rpath,${PREFIX}/lib/${MOZ_RPATH}
>>
>> After adding this line to the ports Makefile, and rebuilding the port,
>> these libraries are now showing as found in the ldd output.
>>
>> Scot
>>
> Isn't that worth a PR?
>
>
Submitted and rejected:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=131237
As it doesn't affect the operation of Firefox3's firefox-bin program.
Scot
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Xorg upgrade desaster: Xlib: extension "Generic Event Extension" missing on display ":0.0".
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 6:39 PM, O. Hartmann
wrote:
> build-process, but I doubt this. I did a 'ldd' on the Firefox3 binary
> and I got the attached dump of the linked shared objects.
> Interestingly, the first three entries show up something missing -
> therefore I deinstalled Firefox and rebuild the browser after an
> additional rebuild of libxcb (via portupgrade -rf). Previously, all Xorg
> thor# ldd firefox-bin
> firefox-bin:
>libxul.so => not found (0x0)
>libmozjs.so => not found (0x0)
>libxpcom.so => not found (0x0)
>libplds4.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libplds4.so.1 (0x80063e000)
>libplc4.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libplc4.so.1 (0x80076f000)
When firefox3 was first added to the ports collection, I had noticed
this problem with firefox3 (after using sysutils/libchk), but I didn't
have this problem with the firefox 2. A look at the difference
between the www/firefox and www/firefox3 Makefiles showed that
firefox3 was missing this:
LDFLAGS+= -Wl,-rpath,${PREFIX}/lib/${MOZ_RPATH}
After adding this line to the ports Makefile, and rebuilding the port,
these libraries are now showing as found in the ldd output.
Scot
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: kldload: can't load /usr/local/modules/fuse.ko: Exec format error & fusefs-ntfs-1.253
On 12/3/08, Scot Hetzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12/3/08, Dino Vliet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi people, > > > > I can't use my maxtor basic 640gb external harddrive on Freebsd amd64 > running 7.0 because when I try to load fusefs with this command, kldload > /usr/local/modules/fuse.ko I get the following error: > > > > kldload: can't load /usr/local/modules/fuse.ko: Exec format error > > : > > > > Does anyone have a clue as to what is causing this behavior? > > > How did you install the fusefs-kmod was it from a package or did you > build it through the ports system? > > The most likely cause of this error is due to the fuse.ko module was > not built against the same source as your kernel. Rebuild fusefs-kmod > and that should resolve the problem. > I usually see this problem after cvs updating the FreeBSD sources and then rebuilding a module, and trying to load that module. Rebuilding the kernel and all external modules should resolve the problem. Scot ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: kldload: can't load /usr/local/modules/fuse.ko: Exec format error & fusefs-ntfs-1.253
On 12/3/08, Dino Vliet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi people, > > I can't use my maxtor basic 640gb external harddrive on Freebsd amd64 > running 7.0 because when I try to load fusefs with this command, kldload > /usr/local/modules/fuse.ko I get the following error: > > kldload: can't load /usr/local/modules/fuse.ko: Exec format error > > Adding fusefs_enable="YES" to /etc/rc.conf and fuse_load="YES" to > /boot/loader.conf and rebooting doesn't help either, because then that error > message is printed on the console. > > uname -a gives: > FreeBSD zouk.telfort.nl 7.0-RELEASE-p6 FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-p6 #1: Thu Nov 27 > 13:42:17 CET 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > > pkg_info | grep fuse gives: > > fusefs-kmod-0.3.9.p1.20080208_4 Kernel module for fuse > fusefs-libs-2.7.3 FUSE allows filesystem implementation in userspace > fusefs-ntfs-1.2531 Mount NTFS partitions (read/write) and disk images > > Does anyone have a clue as to what is causing this behavior? How did you install the fusefs-kmod was it from a package or did you build it through the ports system? The most likely cause of this error is due to the fuse.ko module was not built against the same source as your kernel. Rebuild fusefs-kmod and that should resolve the problem. Scot ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: ports missing their packages.
On 10/29/08, FBSD1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's my understanding that a port maintainer has to install the port for > real any time a change is made to the port make files or a update to the > source of the software to test and verify the changes work as wanted. Port maintainers usually verify that an updated port will build and work correctly with their currently installed ports. > Creating the package after this is just one command and a ftp upload to the > package server. Why are maintainers being given approval to apply their > changes without creating the required package? So you are advocating that port maintainers have to create packages for all the supported FreeBSD architecture's (amd64, arm, i386, ia64, mips, pc98, powerpc, sparc64, sun4v). That would be 9 packages needing to be created at the time the port maintainer submits the upgrade PR. We have the package cluster to automate these builds. > This is just lax management > on the part of the people who do the authorizing of the changes. Missing > packages increases user frustration level and makes FreeBSD look like its > being mis-managed. > Some packages have to remain missing due to their license restricting redistribution of the compiled softare. This can cause other ports that don't have a restrictive license to fail building because one/more of it's dependencies has this restrictive license. > An alternate solution to this problem is to allow users to upload missing > packages to the package server direct or to a staging ftp server so port/pkg > management staff can review first and them populate the production package > server. > This solution won't work, if the user has custom compile flags and/or builds the port with non-default options defined in /etc/make.conf or using 'make config'. The next user who downloads the port might get a package that doesn't function the same as the previous version. The package may not even work on that users computer (i.e. package compiled for k8 processor installed on a pentium4 system). The best solution to find out why a package is not being built for a port is to check it's Makefile, and the Makefiles of it's dependencies. Also looking at http://portsmon.freebsd.org/ to find out why a port has failed to build a package. If you can't find a reason for why the package failed to build, then send a message to the maintainers, and the ports list to have some one look into the problem. It could be as simple as forgetting to add the ports subdirectory to the category Makefile (i.e www/Makefile). Scot ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Adding device to FreeBSD 6.3-STABLE
On 8/1/08, Jack Raats <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > I would like to add the zyd device to FreeBSD. > The zyd driver allready is in FreeBSD 7.0. > Which steps do I have to take to add the zyd device to FreeBSD? > You need to obtain these revisions to compile zyd: sys/dev/usb/if_zyd.c 1.13 sys/modules/zyd/Makefile 1.1 Revision 1.14 was when the net80211 wireless networking stack was committed. Scot ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: lang/gcc34 broken on 8-current?!?!?
I had this same problem. There is an error in the freebsd-spec.h file which causes __FreeBSD__ to be defined twice when FBSD_MAJOR=8. This is caused by a missing 'else' before the 'if (FBSD_MAJOR == 7)' statement. See PR 117287 for the fix. If you have devel/gccxml installed, you'll also need PR 117289. Scot On 10/19/07, Aryeh M. Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > FreeBSD monster 8.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT #1: Thu Oct 18 20:17:48 > UTC 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MONSTER amd64 > > > mv tmp-libgcc.mk libgcc.mk > TARGET_CPU_DEFAULT="" \ > HEADERS="ansidecl.h" DEFINES="" \ > /bin/sh .././..//gcc-3.4.6/gcc/mkconfig.sh tconfig.h > ./xgcc -B./ -B/usr/local/x86_64-portbld-freebsd8.0/bin/ -isystem > /usr/local/x86_64-portbld-freebsd8.0/include -isystem > /usr/local/x86_64-portbld-freebsd8.0/sys-include > -L/usr/ports/lang/gcc34/work/build/gcc/../ld -O2 -DIN_GCC-W -Wall > -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes > -Wold-style-definition -isystem ./include -I. -I. > -I.././..//gcc-3.4.6/gcc -I.././..//gcc-3.4.6/gcc/. > -I.././..//gcc-3.4.6/gcc/../include -g0 -finhibit-size-directive > -fno-inline-functions -fno-exceptions -fno-zero-initialized-in-bss > -fno-unit-at-a-time \ >-c .././..//gcc-3.4.6/gcc/crtstuff.c -DCRT_BEGIN \ > -o crtbegin.o > :78:1: warning: "__FreeBSD__" redefined > :77:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition > In file included from .././..//gcc-3.4.6/gcc/tsystem.h:44, > from .././..//gcc-3.4.6/gcc/crtstuff.c:62: > ./include/stddef.h:57:26: machine/ansi.h: No such file or directory > gmake[2]: *** [crtbegin.o] Error 1 > gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/lang/gcc34/work/build/gcc' > gmake[1]: *** [stage1_build] Error 2 > gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/lang/gcc34/work/build/gcc' > gmake: *** [bootstrap-lean] Error 2 > *** Error code 2 > > > ___ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: request add db45/db46 support to mail/exim port
On 8/11/07, Hajimu UMEMOTO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > >>>>> On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 13:03:32 -0500 > >>>>> "Scot Hetzel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > swhetzel> I believe when I made the change to bsd.database.mk, and then > patched > swhetzel> all of the BDB using ports, I had put the lowest version that the > port > swhetzel> supported into USE_BDB. > > swhetzel> USE_BDB=yes would also work and allow the port to show a > dependancy on > swhetzel> the default BDB version instead of the lowest BDB version. Also, > swhetzel> INVALID_BDB_VER takes care of excluding BDB versions that the port > swhetzel> doesn't work with. > > Yes, it is same as my understanding. So, I think a user doesn't > specify WITH_BSD_VER explicitly, exim will use db40, while other ports > which use bsd.database.mk use db41. > That would be true, except that the exim port is setting WITH_BDB_VER?=1 to use the system BDB by default. I have now fixed it so that the exim port doesn't need to set WITH_BDB_VER?=1 anymore. Instead setting either WITH_BDB or WITH_BDB_VER > 1 will make the port use Mk/bsd.database.mk to choose the version of BDB to use, otherwise it will default to the system BDB. The updated patch is in PR 115427: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=115427 Scot -- DISCLAIMER: No electrons were mamed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: request add db45/db46 support to mail/exim port
On 8/11/07, Hajimu UMEMOTO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > >>>>> On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 12:37:18 -0500 > >>>>> "Scot Hetzel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > swhetzel> Here's the correct code for BDB detection: > > swhetzel> USE_BDB= 40+ > > Why do you specify USE_BDB as 40+, explicitly? Since, it is defined > as 41+ in bsd.database.mk, I believe USE_BDB=yes is enough. > I believe when I made the change to bsd.database.mk, and then patched all of the BDB using ports, I had put the lowest version that the port supported into USE_BDB. USE_BDB=yes would also work and allow the port to show a dependancy on the default BDB version instead of the lowest BDB version. Also, INVALID_BDB_VER takes care of excluding BDB versions that the port doesn't work with. Scot -- DISCLAIMER: No electrons were mamed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: request add db45/db46 support to mail/exim port
On 8/11/07, snowcrash+freebsd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi,
>
> > Sounds great, just one point: I'd prefer seeing that exim would make use
> > of bsd.database.mk.
>
> i /thought/ that use of WITH_BDB_VER/USE_BDB *is* 'making use of'
> bsd.database.mk, wherein,
>
> ...
> .if defined(WITH_BDB_VER)
> . if ${WITH_BDB_VER} == 4
> USE_BDB=40
> . elif ${WITH_BDB_VER} != 1
> USE_BDB=${WITH_BDB_VER}
> . endif
> .endif
> _WANT_BDB_VER= ${USE_BDB}
> ...
>
> but, changes in exim port may well be required for 'compliance'.
>
> > I have Cc'ed maintainer (krion@).
>
Here's the correct code for BDB detection:
.if ${WITH_BDB_VER} == 1
DB_LIBS=
DB_INCLUDES=
SEDLIST+= -e 's,^(DBMLIB=),\# \1,'
.else
USE_BDB= 40+
INVALID_BDB_VER=2 3
DB_LIBS=-L${BDB_LIB_DIR} -l${BDB_LIB_NAME}
DB_INCLUDES=-I${BDB_INCLUDE_DIR}
.endif
Scot
--
DISCLAIMER:
No electrons were mamed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised.
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/mail/exim/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.228
diff -u -r1.228 Makefile
--- Makefile 4 Aug 2007 11:41:00 - 1.228
+++ Makefile 11 Aug 2007 17:35:33 -
@@ -327,28 +327,11 @@
DB_LIBS=
DB_INCLUDES=
SEDLIST+= -e 's,^(DBMLIB=),\# \1,'
-.elif (${WITH_BDB_VER} == 4)
-DB_LIBS= -L${LOCALBASE}/lib -ldb4
-DB_INCLUDES= -I${LOCALBASE}/include/db4
-LIB_DEPENDS+= db4.0:${PORTSDIR}/databases/db4
-.elif (${WITH_BDB_VER} == 41)
-DB_LIBS= -L${LOCALBASE}/lib -ldb41
-DB_INCLUDES= -I${LOCALBASE}/include/db41
-LIB_DEPENDS+= db41.1:${PORTSDIR}/databases/db41
-.elif (${WITH_BDB_VER} == 42)
-DB_LIBS= -L${LOCALBASE}/lib -ldb-4.2
-DB_INCLUDES= -I${LOCALBASE}/include/db42
-LIB_DEPENDS+= db-4.2.2:${PORTSDIR}/databases/db42
-.elif (${WITH_BDB_VER} == 43)
-DB_LIBS= -L${LOCALBASE}/lib -ldb-4.3
-DB_INCLUDES= -I${LOCALBASE}/include/db43
-LIB_DEPENDS+= db-4.3.0:${PORTSDIR}/databases/db43
-.elif (${WITH_BDB_VER} == 44)
-DB_LIBS= -L${LOCALBASE}/lib -ldb-4.4
-DB_INCLUDES= -I${LOCALBASE}/include/db44
-LIB_DEPENDS+= db-4.4.0:${PORTSDIR}/databases/db44
.else
-BROKEN= WITH_BDB_VER must be either 1, 4, 41, 42, 43 or 44
+USE_BDB= 40+
+INVALID_BDB_VER= 2 3
+DB_LIBS= -L${BDB_LIB_DIR} -l${BDB_LIB_NAME}
+DB_INCLUDES= -I${BDB_INCLUDE_DIR}
.endif
SEDLIST+= -e 's,XX_DB_LIBS_XX,${DB_LIBS},' \
-e 's,XX_DB_INCLUDES_XX,${DB_INCLUDES},'
@@ -479,10 +462,10 @@
.endif
.if defined(WITH_SQLITE)
+USE_SQLITE= yes
SEDLIST+= -e 's,XX_SQLITE_LIBS_XX,-L${LOCALBASE}/lib -lsqlite3,' \
-e 's,XX_SQLITE_FLAGS_XX,-I${LOCALBASE}/include,' \
-e 's,^\# (LOOKUP_SQLITE=),\1,'
-LIB_DEPENDS+= sqlite3.8:${PORTSDIR}/databases/sqlite3
.else
SEDLIST+= -e 's,XX_SQLITE_LIBS_XX,,' \
-e 's,XX_SQLITE_FLAGS_XX,,'
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Xorg Modular
On 5/5/07, Jason Hills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 5/5/07, Philipp Ost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jason Hills wrote: > > Is there any prevision when will it be on ports? Will beryl, aiglx and > > stuff come along? > > Kris did announce it some days ago. You'll want to check the archives of > ports@ ;) > > > Philipp Yeah, Kris mentioned something like that in a private mail, but google didnt help me, nor http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-announce/ :( It was announced on the freebsd-ports lists that modular Xorg is being imported, and that the ports tree was to be frozen until the import is completed: Try looking in: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/ Scot -- DISCLAIMER: No electrons were mamed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Acer Aspire WLMi 5102 with AMD Turion 64 X2 system hanging with powerd on 6.2-RC1 and 6.2-PRERELEASE
On 12/20/06, Abdullah Al-Marrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello guys, I have problem with my laptop Acer Aspire 5102 WLMi which has AMD Turion™ 64 X2 dual-core TL-50 1.6 GHz with 1.5 GB of ram. I'm running i386 6.2-RC1 upgraded to 6.2-PRELEASE via RELENG6 tag since I don't have more than 4 GB of ram. I have these lines add to my custom generic kernel options SMP device cpufreq device smbus I have this in my rc.conf powerd_enable="YES" But the the laptop even doesn't boot some times, and if booted it hangs all the time, till I hashed out powerd_enable="YES" hints? Had the same problem where powerd would hang my HP Pavilion dv8000 system. I worked arround the problem by using the following in rc.conf: powerd_enable="YES" powerd_flags="-a maximum -b maximum" Of course this makes powered do nothing when on battery. What I think is happening is that powered is too aggressive in downgrading the clock speed, that it eventually sets the clock to a value that is so low that the system stops responding. Scot -- DISCLAIMER: No electrons were mamed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD 6.2-RC1 issues Acer Aspire 5102 WLMi
On 12/18/06, Abdullah Al-Marrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello guys, First thanks for the hard work to make FreeBSD good for desktop environment. Here is my case with Acer Aspire 5102 WLMi with the latest bios 2.40 2. I can't use my WLAN which is broadcom, I was forced to use an older drivers, since ndis has problem with reading the latest driver from broadcom. Here are the files http://bb.wearab.net/attachment.php?attachmentid=472&d=1166427326 http://bb.wearab.net/attachment.php?attachmentid=473&d=1166427326 And here is the 78 MB full package for the driver in zip file ftp://ftp.support.acer-euro.com/notebook/aspire_3100_5100_5110/driver/802bg_broadcom_v4.10.40.0.zip Could someone convert the 2 files to a kernel module? please let me know. You need to apply the patch in PR 106131 to use the newer versions of the broadcom driver. I have tested it with version 4.10.40.19 from HPs web site (SP33008.exe). http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=106131 Scot -- DISCLAIMER: No electrons were mamed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: kde3 Make Install failure
On 8/22/06, Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- It is http.test
that appear to fail
The failure begins with:
http.test
http-3.3 http::geturl FAILED
Contents of test case:
set token [hrrp::geturl $url]
http:: data $token
Test generated error; return code was: 1
Return code should have been one of: 0 2
errorInfo: couldn't open socket: connection timed out
while executing
"http::geturl $url
"set token [http::geturl $url]
("uplevel" body line 2)
invoked from within
"uplevel 1 $script"
errorCode: NONE
http-3.3 FAILED
This continues incrementing the http-x.3 version until final hang
I cannot get full redirection of the test as
# Make Install > filename
does not work!!
You still didn't go back far enough, as we can't see which port is
failing, but I suspect that it is the tcl84 port, as it redefines the
build target to be "build test", if you remove the "test", the tcl84
port will install. Don't know why it is failing the tests, as we need
someone who knows tcl to have a look at it.
Scot
--
DISCLAIMER:
No electrons were mamed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: pkgtools.conf make arguments ignored (?!?)
On 12/11/05, martinko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hello,
>
> i'm having troubles with specifying make arguments to portupgrade via
> /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf.
> this is a part of my config file:
>
> MAKE_ARGS = {
> 'x11/yelp' => 'WITH_MAN=1 WITH_INFO=1 WITH_GECKO=mozilla',
> }
>
> it works only if i run `portupgrade -N yelp`
> but it does not work when i run eg `portupgrade -N gnome2-lite`
>
> interesting thing is that according to pkgtools.conf itself the
> following should work too but it does not :
>
> MAKE_ARGS = {
> 'x11/yelp-*' => 'WITH_MAN=1 WITH_INFO=1 WITH_GECKO=mozilla',
> }
>
> is this a known issue (and why?) or am i doing something wrong ??
>
Do you have an entry in the MAKE_ARGS for x11/gnome2-lite? As your
example doesn't show an entry for it.
Scot
--
DISCLAIMER:
No electrons were mamed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: can't get subversion+apache2 to install
On 12/5/05, Jeff D. Hamann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FreeBSD-ers,
>
> I've been trying to get a new FreeBSD 6.0 machine up and I've having a
> little trouble with the subversion port with the WITH switches to no avail.
>
>
> bobby# make install -DWITH_MOD_DAV_SVN -DWITH_BOOK
> ===> Installing for subversion-1.3.0.r2
> ===> subversion-1.3.0.r2 depends on executable: - not found
> ===>Verifying install for in /usr/ports/www/apache20
> ===> Returning to build of subversion-1.3.0.r2
> ===> subversion-1.3.0.r2 depends on shared library: expat.5 - found
> ===> subversion-1.3.0.r2 depends on shared library: neon.24 - found
> ===> subversion-1.3.0.r2 depends on shared library: intl - found
> -e -S LIBEXECDIR=/usr/local/libexec/apache2 -a -n dav
> libexec/apache2/mod_dav.so
> -e: not found
> *** Error code 127
>
I found what the problem is:
.if defined(WITH_MOD_DAV_SVN)
pre-install:
${APXS} -e -S LIBEXECDIR=${PREFIX}/libexec/apache2 -a -n dav
libexec/apache2/mod_dav.so
.endif
the variable APXS is not defined in the Makefile for the port. This
is why you are getting the "-e: not found" error as make is trying to
run the "-e" program.
This port needs to either define APXS or set the USE_APACHE variable
to define which apache port it depends on, and to defined the APXS
variable.
Scot
--
DISCLAIMER:
No electrons were mamed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: What to do when panic?
On 7/21/05, Kövesdán Gábor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > FreeBSD 6. I installed it, and then I had a panic. I got a > debugger prompt, but I don't know what to do with that. I don't know the > debugger commands. Please let me know what should I do when I have an > another panic. What should I type and what kind of information should I > send as a PR. > Look at the FreeBSD Developer HandBook on debugging: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/debugging.html http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/kerneldebug.html Scot -- DISCLAIMER: No electrons were mamed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: building KLDs in RELENG_4
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:56:22 -0500, Peter C. Lai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there a way to build kernel modules by themselves without having to > build the entire kernel? I am adding umass support to a 4.x machine but > I don't want to build the entire kernel. I already have scbus, but I need > da and of course, umass. > Yes you can build modules seperately from a kernel build cd /usr/src/sys/modules/umass make obj make make install Scot ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Cyrus IMAP crashes after reading /etc/krb5.conf
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 21:59:21 -0500, Mikhail Teterin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello! > > I'm trying to configure a freshly built mail/cyrus-imapd22 to work and > authenticate accounts -- Kerberos and plain text. > > The GSSAPI authentication works already. After doing kinit, I can do ``imtest > -m GSSAPI hostname'' and it succeeds. > > Now I'm trying to login with plain text (over SSL). Cyrus' imapd keeps > crashing from SIGBUS. According to ktrace, this happens right after reading > the krb5.conf (I replaced our domain with "example" below): > The freebsd-security list is for security issue with the FreeBSD operating system. Your question involves a port question. freebsd-questions, cyrus mailing list, or freebsd-ports is where you should have posted. You'll need to use gdb on the cyrus-imapd .core file to find out where it is failing. You'll also need a version of the cyrus-imapd compiled with debugging symbols to get something usefull out of gdb. i.e. gdb /usr/ports/mail/cyrus-imapd22/work/cyrus-imapd-2.2*// -c //.core (check the man page, I'm not sure -c is correct for the core file) then use bt (backtrace) in gdb and it will show you the src file & function where the failure is occuring. You may also want to look at the values of some of the variables (i.e. p varname, p *varname, p &varname) Scot PS. I BCC freebsd-security, do not post any replies there. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: 4.7->5.0, ran out of space on /
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 10:11:02 -1000 (HST), Vincent Poy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Kirk R. Wythers wrote: > > > I just ran into a problem trying to install the 5.0 world. I thought I > > checked and had 30M free on / before I started this. However, after > > building, the world, building the kernel, installing the kernel, running > > mergemaster -p, I went to install the world and got the error 'out of > > space on /' > > > > I need to find some room, but I'm a little nervous about what I can rm. > > Here is what I'm looking at: > > > > 1) / partition is 79M, 64M are used (I was almost sure there was > > more room than that on / before I satarted). > > 2) /tmp is on it's own partition > > 3) du -h on subdirectories breakdown like this. > > a. 18M /boot > > b. 1.4M /etc > > c. 3.7M /kernel > > d. 3.9M /kern.GENERIC > > e. 6M /modules > > f. 21M /sbin > > g. 2.1M /stand > > > > as you can see that pretty much accounts for it. The rest of the stuff > > is pretty small. > > > > I need to know if I can delete any of this stuff and still successfully > > do a 'make installworld'? > > > /modules can all be deleted since these are now in /boot > /sbin > /stand > should stay > You could also remove /stand, as most of it's functionality has been moved to the the /rescue directory. Also, make sure that Soft-Updates is turned off on your root directory. Because Soft-Updates doesn't immediately free the space on the drive. Scot ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
