Re: jdk14+tomcat5 crashing box
On (2003/12/31 04:55), Brett Gulla wrote: Thanks for the input, but the problem seems to have been fixed. Here's what I did: 1. cvsup'd to 5.2 RC 2. upgraded to tomcat 5.0.16 PS. Using native threads (-lc_r not -pthread) I believe that the problem was fixed in FreeBSD itself, because an upgrade from a pre-5.2-RC1 to 5.2-CURRENT fixed exactly this problem for me. I didn't need to upgrade Tomcat. Ciao, Sheldon. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linking disk utilization to a process
Hi folks, Can anyone suggest a way to link disk utilization to a process? I can see whether my disks are busy with systat -vmstat, but I don't know how to find out _which_ processes are causing the work. Ideas? Ciao, Sheldon. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mount_smbfs: RPC struct is bad
Hi folks, I'm using SMBFS on FreeBSD 4.9-PRERELEASE from 2003-09-18, and running into problems mounting W2K shares. I was last able to mount these shares a month ago. Since then, the only change I'm aware of was the world update (to catch security patches) and accompanying mergemaster. Here's the config: /etc/fstab: //[EMAIL PROTECTED]/backup /smb/foo smbfs noauto,ro,-N 0 0 /etc/nsmb.conf [default] workgroup=BAR [FOO:BACKUP:BACKUP] password=xyzzy Here's the problem: # mount /smb/foo smbfs: unable to open connection: syserr = RPC struct is bad Any ideas? Google, Rambler and a search of the freebsd-questions archive both came up empty-handed. Ciao, Sheldon. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mount_smbfs: RPC struct is bad
On (2003/10/30 11:37), Sheldon Hearn wrote: I'm using SMBFS on FreeBSD 4.9-PRERELEASE from 2003-09-18, and running into problems mounting W2K shares. I was last able to mount these shares a month ago. Since then, the only change I'm aware of was the world update (to catch security patches) and accompanying mergemaster. I've just tried with FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE, using today's sources and I still get: # mount /smb/foo smbfs: unable to open connection: syserr = RPC struct is bad Backups are suffering. Any ideas (even shots in the dark) would be helpful. Thanks, Sheldon. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mount_smbfs: RPC struct is bad
On (2003/10/30 18:16), Sheldon Hearn wrote: I'm using SMBFS on FreeBSD 4.9-PRERELEASE from 2003-09-18, and running into problems mounting W2K shares. I was last able to mount these shares a month ago. Since then, the only change I'm aware of was the world update (to catch security patches) and accompanying mergemaster. I've just tried with FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE, using today's sources and I still get: # mount /smb/foo smbfs: unable to open connection: syserr = RPC struct is bad Backups are suffering. Any ideas (even shots in the dark) would be helpful. Found the problem. The Windows user backup, as which the FreeBSD box authenticates when mounting the Windows shares, was created on the domain controller without Password never expires enabled, and the business concerned doesn't have a password recycling policy designed to handle automatic password expiry of system accounts. SMBFS expects one of several responses to the authentication phase, but your password has expired, please change it isn't one of them. I'll send my findings to Boris, the author of our SMBFS support. At least this is in the archives, now. :-) Ciao, Sheldon. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
kern.openfiles doesn't agree with fstat
Hi folks, I've got an ipfilter-enabled RELENG_4 firewall that acts as a DHCP and SMB server for our office LAN. It's running into its upper limit of files, as reported by kern.openfiles. However, when I try to use fstat to report on processes that hold open file handles, the numbers disagree: kern.maxfiles: 9992 kern.maxfilesperproc: 4496 kern.openfiles: 8265 # fstat | awk '$5 ~ /^\// {print $2}' | sort | uniq -c | sort -nr 99 httpd 63 mysqld 50 smbd 48 getty 45 screen 37 sshd 35 bash 30 nfsd 27 sh 24 nfsiod ... The total number of filehandles reported in this way is about 600. Why would these two tools disagree in this way? Ciao, Sheldon. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Duplex printing with HP DeskJet 6122
Hi folks, We just got an HP DeskJet 6122 for printing Unix docs. It comes with a duplexing unit, which works when driven by the supplied Windows driver. However, I'd really rather have this thing connected to my FreeBSD workstation. I've tried CUPS and LPRng, and neither of the two support this printer's duplexing feature out of the box. Does anyone have any suggestions? Ciao, Sheldon. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]