solved: Re: arplookup 0.0.0.0
turns out that the file /etc/mail/local-host-names was not properly configured. damn! it is so galling when one misses the simplest things! stephen On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, Nathan Kinkade wrote: On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 05:20:53PM -0500, Stephen D. Kingrea wrote: tcpdump tells me that incoming smtp requests are generating these messages at the same time as recieving mail. i am pretty sure that either sendmail or ipfw rules is the cause... any good tutorials out there on interpreting tcpdump output? stephen If you have X installed, you could use ethereal (/usr/ports/net/ethereal)it is a very nice graphical interface for analyzing network traffice. I think it uses tcpdump itself?? Nathan -- GPG Public Key ID: 0x4250A04C gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 4250A04C http://63.105.21.156/gpg_nkinkade_4250A04C.asc To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: arplookup 0.0.0.0
tcpdump tells me that incoming smtp requests are generating these messages at the same time as recieving mail. i am pretty sure that either sendmail or ipfw rules is the cause... any good tutorials out there on interpreting tcpdump output? stephen On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Juris Krumins wrote: Could be sendmail. But I would try first of all to figure out who are soucre of the arp request. Suppose we are talking about LAN or something like that. So try to find out the soucre of the request. Could be the same box, but I think it's not. So use sniffers like tcpdump or something like that. Just take a look at your logs to figure out the frequency of requests. So then you will figure out the source. unfortunately I'm not sendmail expert not even close. - Original Message - From: Stephen D. Kingrea [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Juris Krumins [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 4:26 PM Subject: Re: arplookup 0.0.0.0 is there a way to suppress the message itself? i seem to be getting it quite often, and really just started after configuring and activating sendmail. i suspect that there is a possible misconfiguration involving sendmail itself, but mail seems to be flowing nicely stephen d. kingrea On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Juris Krumins wrote: There's no such a term like default in arp table, like it is in routing tables. There's nothing you have to add. I think it was just a query which was sent to your machine. So your box didn't find anything about that in local his local arp table. That's why you got the answer like : www /kernel: arplookup 0.0.0.0 failed: host is not on local network mean that your box knows nothing about how to convert 0.0.0.0 IP adress into MAC adress. - Original Message - From: Stephen D. Kingrea [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 4:07 PM Subject: arplookup 0.0.0.0 hope one of youse can help with this... i am suddenly and inexplicably getting the message: www /kernel: arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 0.0.0.0rt www /kernel: arplookup 0.0.0.0 failed: host is not on local network nothing seems affected, that is to say that everything works as advertised. do i need to add default to my arp tables? running 4.7, apache2, ipfw/natd, as gateway to 3 internal networked nodes. what other info do i need to share? thank you! stephen d. kingrea To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
arplookup 0.0.0.0
hope one of youse can help with this... i am suddenly and inexplicably getting the message: www /kernel: arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 0.0.0.0rt www /kernel: arplookup 0.0.0.0 failed: host is not on local network nothing seems affected, that is to say that everything works as advertised. do i need to add default to my arp tables? running 4.7, apache2, ipfw/natd, as gateway to 3 internal networked nodes. what other info do i need to share? thank you! stephen d. kingrea To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
tcpdump irregularity
using 4.7 on a gateway designated machine (ipfw/natd) serving 3 wstations. www#tcpdump -i dc0 ###in fact, any interface tcpdump: (no devices found) /dev/bpf0: Device not configured now, i read somewhere that kernel must be compiled with option PACKETFILTER, however; workstation running 4.7 with generic kernel runs tcpdump perfectly. /dev/bpf0 permissions are correct. i am logged as root any clues on this? thanks stephen d. kingrea To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
questions about static ipfw rules
running 4.7 with firewall, natd enabled kernel. i wish to create firewall rules outside of the rc.firewall script that remain static across reboots. to that end, i created a set (rc.firewall.rules), pointing rc.conf to that set: firewall_enable=YES firewall_type=/etc/rc.firewall.rules natd_enable=YES.etc /etc/rc.firewall.rules lines are in the format: add 00100 all ip from any to any via lo0 add 00200 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 ...etc. is this right? when i boot to these conditions, and ipfw show, i get the set that appears when i set firewall_type=OPEN is this the proper format for rules in a static file? regards to all! stephen d. kingrea To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: questions about static ipfw rules
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Daniel Bye wrote:
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 03:18:33PM +, Daniel Bye wrote:
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 09:45:09AM -0500, Stephen D. Kingrea wrote:
running 4.7 with firewall, natd enabled kernel. i wish to create firewall
rules outside of the rc.firewall script that remain static across
reboots. to that end, i created a set (rc.firewall.rules), pointing
rc.conf to that set:
firewall_enable=YES
firewall_type=/etc/rc.firewall.rules
You should change firewall_type to firewall_script. You should then
find all works as you want.
Well, almost... If you do it this way, you need to make sure the script
file is executable and makes sense as a shell script. I use something
like
#!/bin/sh
IPFW=/sbin/ipfw
${IPFW} -f flush
${IPFW} add 100 allow ip from any to any via lo0
... etc.
It works well for me.
Dan
yes, that worked quite well. thank you for that nugget!
i should say that joebs' suggestions concerning ipfilter are worthy of
investigation. i really just needed this to be able to ftp files from
inside my lan without having to retype rules at every boot.
thanks!
stephen
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: code 1 error on kernel compile
problems got deeper at this point, since repeated attempts began yielding different results, such as: DMA failure switching to FPIO hard error reading fsbn snip addresses status=59 error=40 leading me to believe that i suddenly have bad ram chip or failing ide controller. switching boxes now to pentium II gateway2000, getting undefined reference errors during make in bt.o code 1. what th? stephen d. kingrea On Sat, 18 Jan 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 07:51:27AM -0500, Stephen D. Kingrea wrote: i have never had any spurious errors on this box since it has been running. until now, anywaybut it has only been running a couple of weeks. this may be the shot across the bow the file in question appears as an e-mail message. line 4 of the header reads: Subject: DON'T DELETE THIS MESSAGE -- FOLDER INTERNAL DATA That's definitely data corruption then. Take an immediate backup in case it gets any worse, then do a fsck in single-user mode to check FS consistency. If that's okay, then just refresh your source tree and hope it doesn't happen again. kris To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: code 1 error on kernel compile (solved)
sorry, right you are...the release is 4.7. i felt that cvsup was
unnecessary, since all that i had done was install from cd.
anyway, i learned that commenting anything from kernel config is
apparently a precipitous affair. uncommenting everything back provided the
juice to finish the make.
i have yet to figure what has gone wrong on the original box, but i do
suspect it to be a hardware issue. i will report
thanks everyone for all the assistance!
stephen d. kingrea
On Sun, 19 Jan 2003, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2003-01-19 09:31, Stephen D. Kingrea wrote:
problems got deeper at this point, since repeated attempts began
yielding different results, such as:
DMA failure switching to FPIO
hard error reading fsbn snip addresses status=59 error=40
leading me to believe that i suddenly have bad ram chip or failing
ide controller.
switching boxes now to pentium II gateway2000, getting undefined
reference errors during make in bt.o code 1. what th?
Please, when reportinng build problems specify at least the following
things in your post:
- Version of FreeBSD you're building.
- Optionally, the date of your last CVSup update.
If your supfile contains base=/usr CVSup saves this information in
the checkouts.cvs file of the ${base}/sup/${collection}/ directory.
Assuming that you use the default supfile examples, the correct path
for the checkouts.cvs file for /usr/src would be
/usr/sup/src-all/checkouts.cvs and the following command will print
a human-readable form of the last update date:
$ date -j \
-f '%s' `head -1 /usr/sup/src-all/checkouts.cvs | \
awk '{print $3}'`'+%+'
Sun Jan 19 14:09:33 EET 2003
- The exact error message of your build.
These are required for someone who will try to reproduce the build
problems you're having.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: code 1 error on kernel compile
On Sun, 19 Jan 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 09:31:52AM -0500, Stephen D. Kingrea wrote: problems got deeper at this point, since repeated attempts began yielding different results, such as: DMA failure switching to FPIO hard error reading fsbn snip addresses status=59 error=40 leading me to believe that i suddenly have bad ram chip or failing ide controller. Sounds likely it's a dying HD. that's possible, since i am recieving same error at about the same time. switching boxes now to pentium II gateway2000, getting undefined reference errors during make in bt.o code 1. what th? Not enough information. Kris actually, that problem has been solved. commenting nothing and just adding the few firewall and natd options that i needed worked beautifully, how advisable is it to comment out options and devices while configuring custom kernels? i am currently running 2 workstations behind freebsd gateway/server without issue and starting to add services incrementally. are there any comprehensive guides to all of the required kernel config options? warmest regards, stephen To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: code 1 error on kernel compile
i have never had any spurious errors on this box since it has been running. until now, anywaybut it has only been running a couple of weeks. this may be the shot across the bow the file in question appears as an e-mail message. line 4 of the header reads: Subject: DON'T DELETE THIS MESSAGE -- FOLDER INTERNAL DATA several attempts to compile using both methods yields the same result at the same spot.what a mess. stephen d. kingrea On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 12:09:34PM -0500, Stephen D. Kingrea wrote: make depend returns (last 5 lines): In file included from ../../isa/fdreg.h:42, ../../fd.c/:85: ../../isa/ic/nec765.h:4: unterminated character constant mkdep: compile failed *** error code 1 have i done something wrong? Looks like you might have corrupted source (possibly due to bad hardware such as bad RAM or CPU cooling), but it's difficult to be certain without more information. * What is on line 4 of that header? * Does it always fail in the same place? * Have you had other spurious errors on this machine under load? etc. Kris To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
different ipfw/natd prob
i have a slightly different ipfw/natd problem. machines on the lan can ping internal nic on the server (fbsd 4.7), and the external nic, but can not ping or reach anything outside. unless i telnet into the server, then telnet out. currently running ipfw open until problem is solved. server can ping all machines on lan. stephen To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: different ipfw/natd prob
oh, this looks bad before i do that, i should mention that in the meantime, i tried to add a divert rule and got ip_fw_ctl: invalid command on boot, i get IP packet filtering initialized, divert disabled, rule-based forwarding enabled, default to deny, logging disabled is this a clue that i need to rebuild kernel? stephen d. kingrea On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, Bill Moran wrote: Stephen D. Kingrea wrote: i have a slightly different ipfw/natd problem. machines on the lan can ping internal nic on the server (fbsd 4.7), and the external nic, but can not ping or reach anything outside. unless i telnet into the server, then telnet out. currently running ipfw open until problem is solved. server can ping all machines on lan. On a wild guess, it sounds like your divert rule is wrong. Need more information to help with this. Please repost to the list and include the following: The output of 'ipfw show' The output of 'ifconfig' The contents of your rc.conf file -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: different ipfw/natd prob
following is rc.conf, /etc/natd.conf, ifconfig, ipfw show rc.conf inetd_enable=YES kern_securelevel_enable=NO linux_enable=YES tcp_extensions=YES named_enable=YES sendmail_enable=NO portmap_enable=YES router_enable=yes router=/sbin/routed router_flags=-q defaultrouter=68.abc.de.1 hostname=www.kingrea.com network_interfaces=lo0 fxp0 dc0 ifconfig_lo0=inet 127.0.0.1 ifconfig_dc0=inet 68.abc.de.14 netmask 255.255.255.0 media 10baseT/UTP ifconfig_fxp0=inet 192.168.2.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 firewall_enable=YES firewall_type=OPEN gateway_enable=YES natd_enable=YES natd_interface=dc0 natd_flags=-f /etc/natd.conf natd.conf interface dc0 use_sockets yes same_ports yes ifconfig dc0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500 inet 68.abc.de.14 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 68.abc.de.255 inet6 fe80::204:5aff:fe5a:9987%dc0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 ether 00:04:5a:5a:99:87 media: Ethernet 10baseT/UTP status: active fxp0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500 inet 192.168.2.1 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.2.255 inet6 fe80::2a0:c9ff:fe5c:3738%fxp0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 ether 00:a0:c9:5c:37:38 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX) status: active lp0: flags=8810POINTOPOINT,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500 faith0: flags=8002BROADCAST,MULTICAST mtu 1500 lo0: flags=8049UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST mtu 16384 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x5 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00 ppp0: flags=8010POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST mtu 1500 sl0: flags=c010POINTOPOINT,LINK2,MULTICAST mtu 552 ipfw show 00100 0 0 allow ip from any to any via lo0 00200 0 0 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 00300 0 0 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any 65000 4208345040 all ip from any to any 65535 0 0 deny ip from any to any thanks for assistance! stephen d. kingrea On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, Bill Moran wrote: Stephen D. Kingrea wrote: i have a slightly different ipfw/natd problem. machines on the lan can ping internal nic on the server (fbsd 4.7), and the external nic, but can not ping or reach anything outside. unless i telnet into the server, then telnet out. currently running ipfw open until problem is solved. server can ping all machines on lan. On a wild guess, it sounds like your divert rule is wrong. Need more information to help with this. Please repost to the list and include the following: The output of 'ipfw show' The output of 'ifconfig' The contents of your rc.conf file -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: different ipfw/natd prob
i agree. it does seem that i need to recompile: www# ipfw add diver natd all from any to any via dc0 ip_fw_ctl: invalid command ipfw: getsockopt(IP_FW_ADD): Invalid argument would seem to indicate this.. i shall commence, as per yours and JoeB's suggestion and report back thank you both stephen d. kingrea On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, Bill Moran wrote: Stephen D. Kingrea wrote: oh, this looks bad before i do that, i should mention that in the meantime, i tried to add a divert rule and got ip_fw_ctl: invalid command on boot, i get IP packet filtering initialized, divert disabled, rule-based forwarding enabled, default to deny, logging disabled Sounds like you need to recompile your kernel with IPDIVERT (as someone else pointed out) -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
code 1 error on kernel compile
make depend returns (last 5 lines): In file included from ../../isa/fdreg.h:42, ../../fd.c/:85: ../../isa/ic/nec765.h:4: unterminated character constant mkdep: compile failed *** error code 1 have i done something wrong? stephen d. kingrea To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
solved : Re: newbie questions about pppoe and netgraph
2 problems 1 cable modem needed 10baset connection. changed rc.conf= ifconfig_dc0=inet xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx mask 255.255.255.0 media 10baseT/UTP fixed that problem 2 didn't need pppoe after all! after changing media, was able to ping external router btw, this is charter pipeline (vermont) service (768) using 3com 3cr29223 home connect external usb/ether (NOT adsl dual connect). tech support was friendly but basically clueless (i don't know anything about free-bee-ess-dee ppp over ethernet? what's that?). anyway, thanks for all of your helpi learned more about pppoe than i ever wanted. all you guys are terrific! stephen On Sat, 11 Jan 2003, Stephen D. Kingrea wrote: this is the latest, unchanged from this am. i should say that using different parameters from the several different tutorial sources has resulted in pretty much the same result: flaking out at lpc (if that is what is really happening) additionally, the set ifaddr line seems superfluous, since i have an assigned ip address and established route default: set device PPPoE:fxp0 set speed mru 1492 set speed mtu 1492 set ctsrts off enable lqr set lqrperiod 5 set cd 5 set log All set log local phase chat lcp ccp tun command add default HISADDR enable dns set ifaddr 10.0.0.1/0 10.0.0.2/0 255.255.255 0.0.0.0 set authname * set authkey * set login set dial set timeout 0 open stephen On Sat, 11 Jan 2003, Matthew Emmerton wrote: What does your ppp.conf look like? For PPPoE, it you should have a line like this: [ dang email client ] set device PPPoE:ed1 where ed1 is the network card that is hooked up to your DSL modem. -- Matt www# /usr/sbin/ppp Working in interactive mode Using interface: tun0 tun0: Command: default: add default HISADDR tun0: Command: default: enable DNS tun0: Command: default: set ifaddr 10.0.0.1/0 10.0.0.0/2 255.255.255 0.0.0.0 tun0: Command: default: set authname ** tun0: Command: default: set authkey ** tun0: Command: default: set login tun0: Command: default: set dial tun0: Command: default: set timeout 0 tun0: Command: default: open tun0: Phase: bundle: Establish tun0: Phase: closed - opening tun0: Phase: PPP started (interactive) tun0: Phase: deflink: Connected! tun0: Phase: deflink: opening - dial tun0: Chat: deflink: Dial attempt 1 of 1 tun0: Phase: deflink: dial - carrier ppp ON www tun0: Phase: deflink: Disconnected! tun0: Phase: deflink: carrier - hangup tun0: Phase: deflink: Connect time: 5 secs: 0 octets in, 0 octets out tun0: Phase: total 0 bytes/sec, peak 0 bytes/sec on Sat Jan 11 tun0: Phase: deflink hangup - closed tun0: Phase: bundle: Dead i imagine that some of this is unnecessary, but it appears that i am not even getting to authentication before disconnecting. thank you stephen On Sat, 11 Jan 2003, Matthew Emmerton wrote: attempting to run pppoe on freebsd 4.7 over cable/dsl connection. manual says kernel recompilation unnecessary for this release in order to run pppoe. however, netgraph does not seem to be loading at boot time. additionally, pppoe seems unable to get past lcp when connecting. how can i tell if netgraph is active after boot? if not, can netgraph modules be loaded at boot by adding necessary lines into loader.conf? or is recompiling kernel a preferred method? If netgraph and pppoe support are not present in your kernel (or not loaded from modules automatically), the ppp program will complain loudly. Can you post part of your ppp log file so that we can determine if the lack of pppoe is your problem or if it's something else? -- Matt Emmerton To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
newbie questions about pppoe and netgraph
attempting to run pppoe on freebsd 4.7 over cable/dsl connection. manual says kernel recompilation unnecessary for this release in order to run pppoe. however, netgraph does not seem to be loading at boot time. additionally, pppoe seems unable to get past lcp when connecting. how can i tell if netgraph is active after boot? if not, can netgraph modules be loaded at boot by adding necessary lines into loader.conf? or is recompiling kernel a preferred method? stephen To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: newbie questions about pppoe and netgraph
ok here is what i get www# /usr/sbin/ppp Working in interactive mode Using interface: tun0 tun0: Command: default: add default HISADDR tun0: Command: default: enable DNS tun0: Command: default: set ifaddr 10.0.0.1/0 10.0.0.0/2 255.255.255 0.0.0.0 tun0: Command: default: set authname ** tun0: Command: default: set authkey ** tun0: Command: default: set login tun0: Command: default: set dial tun0: Command: default: set timeout 0 tun0: Command: default: open tun0: Phase: bundle: Establish tun0: Phase: closed - opening tun0: Phase: PPP started (interactive) tun0: Phase: deflink: Connected! tun0: Phase: deflink: opening - dial tun0: Chat: deflink: Dial attempt 1 of 1 tun0: Phase: deflink: dial - carrier ppp ON www tun0: Phase: deflink: Disconnected! tun0: Phase: deflink: carrier - hangup tun0: Phase: deflink: Connect time: 5 secs: 0 octets in, 0 octets out tun0: Phase: total 0 bytes/sec, peak 0 bytes/sec on Sat Jan 11 tun0: Phase: deflink hangup - closed tun0: Phase: bundle: Dead i imagine that some of this is unnecessary, but it appears that i am not even getting to authentication before disconnecting. thank you stephen On Sat, 11 Jan 2003, Matthew Emmerton wrote: attempting to run pppoe on freebsd 4.7 over cable/dsl connection. manual says kernel recompilation unnecessary for this release in order to run pppoe. however, netgraph does not seem to be loading at boot time. additionally, pppoe seems unable to get past lcp when connecting. how can i tell if netgraph is active after boot? if not, can netgraph modules be loaded at boot by adding necessary lines into loader.conf? or is recompiling kernel a preferred method? If netgraph and pppoe support are not present in your kernel (or not loaded from modules automatically), the ppp program will complain loudly. Can you post part of your ppp log file so that we can determine if the lack of pppoe is your problem or if it's something else? -- Matt Emmerton To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
newbie cluele re routing issue
ok, i know that i am a newbie, but perhaps what i am trying to do is impossible. goal: host 2 domains locally equipment: linksys wireless router (4 ethernet connections--wireless not running yet), freebsd 4.7 on dedicated p166, and several boxes/os's connected dhcp. i assigned router 1 static address (68.114.63.14), server lan address (192.168.1.110). domain1.com is working. i wish to alias second static address (68.114.63.34) on server for domain2.com. try as i might, i cannot make this work. is it even possible? linksys says: place hub between modem and router, connect server to hub (placing server outside lan). that scenario renders server incapable of communicating with isp's router (68.114.63.1). i am beginning to wonder whether i can even accomplish this. it seems simple enough, however; i just can't make it work any suggestions? tia stephen d. kingrea To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: newbie cluele re routing issue
yes, it is cable/dsl. that would explain the lack of connectivity under the linksys scenario. i will try this again and report back. thank you for the clue stephen d. kingrea On 10 Jan 2003, Matt Smith wrote: Regarding your ISP -- is this a DSL connection? If so, your DMZ server (connected to the Hub) probably needs to run PPPoE. Is it? Anything behind the linksys device does not, because the linksys device takes care of PPPoE for everything behind it. -Matt On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 14:20, Stephen D. Kingrea wrote: ok, i know that i am a newbie, but perhaps what i am trying to do is impossible. goal: host 2 domains locally equipment: linksys wireless router (4 ethernet connections--wireless not running yet), freebsd 4.7 on dedicated p166, and several boxes/os's connected dhcp. i assigned router 1 static address (68.114.63.14), server lan address (192.168.1.110). domain1.com is working. i wish to alias second static address (68.114.63.34) on server for domain2.com. try as i might, i cannot make this work. is it even possible? linksys says: place hub between modem and router, connect server to hub (placing server outside lan). that scenario renders server incapable of communicating with isp's router (68.114.63.1). i am beginning to wonder whether i can even accomplish this. it seems simple enough, however; i just can't make it work any suggestions? tia stephen d. kingrea To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message -- Matt Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
