portaudit question

2004-12-10 Thread Thomas S. Crum - AAA Web Solution, Inc.
Is there something that I am not updating that portaudit would like to see
done or is this just a generic warning. Either way, please provide
examples of what I might due to have it stop complaining. I can find no
examples googling the portaudit note below.

# Here's what I did.

Installed 4.10 from mini iso.
pkg_add -r cvsup-without-gui
cvsup -g -L 2 /root/standard-supfile #updated all source
compiled and installed kernel and world per handbook
cvsup -g -L 2 /root/ports-supfile #updated all ports
cd /usr/ports/security/portaudit
make install clean

# Here's what I get.

beta# /usr/local/sbin/portaudit -Fda
auditfile.tbz 100% of   15 kB   33 kBps
New database installed.
Database created: Fri Dec 10 08:40:32 EST 2004
Affected package: FreeBSD-491000
Type of problem: multiple vulnerabilities in the cvs server code.
Reference:
http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/portaudit/d2102505-f03d-11d8-81b0-000347a4fa
7d.html
Note: To disable this check add the uuid to `portaudit_fixed' in
/usr/local/etc/portaudit.conf
0 problem(s) in your installed packages found.

# Here's what I did next.

man portaudit  no help
pkg_delete cvsup-without-gui-16.1h
cd /usr/ports/net/cvsup-without-gui
make install clean
/usr/local/sbin/portaudit -Fda  and get same output as above.

Best,

Thomas S. Crum


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


RE: Questions regarding FreeBSD

2004-12-10 Thread Thomas S. Crum - AAA Web Solution, Inc.
All of this is in the handbook at:

http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/index.html

Best,

Thomas S. Crum

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alexis Rios
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 8:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Questions regarding FreeBSD

Hi
I'm just trying to install firewall , and developing networking methods
using FreeBSD.
 
I have the 5.3 version for i386 , and i just want to know how is the best
way to install the firewalls (I'm using the root account), to develop
network aliasing , and using FreeBSD as a serverrouter.
Regards
Alexis



-
Do you Yahoo!?
 Send a seasonal email greeting and help others. Do good.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


RE: php4-cli or mod_php4

2004-12-03 Thread Thomas S. Crum - AAA Web Solution, Inc.
By installing php4-extensions it will auto to using mod_php with apache. I
have never had a lick of trouble with apache 1.3 and the above mentioned
set-up. Although, as the message states many have complained of trouble with
2.

I recommend installing mysql 1st, apache 1.3 2nd, then the php4-extensions.

Best,

Thomas S. Crum

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew L. Gould
Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 8:45 AM
To: Cristi Tauber
Cc: FreeBSD Question
Subject: Re: php4-cli or mod_php4

On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 15:30:15 +0200
Cristi Tauber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hello list,
 
   i want to install apache+php+mysql. If i install mod_php i cannot
 install php4-extension (mysql, etc ...). If i try to install php4-cli
 and extensions apache doesn't know how to handle .php files . What's
 the they to go to make apache work with mysql and php ? fBSD is 5.3.
 
  Thanks,
 
   Cristi

Hi Cristi,

Install php4-extensions; and then follow these instructions, which are
found in /usr/ports/lang/php4/pkg-message.mod:

***

Make sure index.php is part of your DirectoryIndex.

You should add the following to your Apache configuration file:

AddType application/x-httpd-php .php
AddType application/x-httpd-php-source .phps

***

You're next big question may be whether to use apache 1.3 or apache 2,
as I keep seeing references on the internet about people having
problems with php and apache 2.

Best regards,

Andrew Gould
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Dell Servers

2004-12-02 Thread Thomas S. Crum - AAA Web Solution, Inc.
I had no problem running 4.10 on Dell power edge, so I'm sure 5.3 would work
fine also.

Best,

Thomas S. Crum

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Maxwell
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 8:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Dell Servers

Is anyone running 5.3 Release on Dell Power Edge 2850 or any Dell Power 
Edge? I am looking to build a new mail server to replace our current 
mail server, a desktop running 4.9

We have a few Dell Power Edge servers all running windows, that the 
company is happy with so they want me to get a Dell. I want to get 
something with mirrored drives and dual power supplies so I don't have 
to worry about hardware failure.


Jeff Maxwell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Port 53 requests happening a few times per second

2004-11-27 Thread Thomas S. Crum - AAA Web Solution, Inc.
Here is the situation, I run bind as a root nameserver and all appears to be
operating normally (no apparent problems).  But, log_in_vain is reporting to
messages a few times per second that port 53 is being queried and nothing
appears to be listing on it. I monitored my forwarders ip addresses and
they reply fine.

I found a reference to search for bind timeout problem, but could find
nothing that looked like any help.

Any ideas?

Couple of stats:
FreeBSD 4.10
BIND 8.3.7-REL
using 2 forwarders
127.0.0.1 in resolve.conf
log_in_vain=YES in rc.conf
allow all from any to any via lo0 in ipfw

server1# tail /var/log/messages
Nov 27 16:28:17 server1 /kernel: Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:3350
from 127.0.0.1:53
Nov 27 16:28:18 server1 /kernel: Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:1750
from 127.0.0.1:53
Nov 27 16:28:18 server1 /kernel: Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:4321
from 127.0.0.1:53
Nov 27 16:28:18 server1 /kernel: Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:4071
from 127.0.0.1:53
Nov 27 16:28:18 server1 /kernel: Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:3037
from 127.0.0.1:53
Nov 27 16:28:18 server1 /kernel: Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:4384
from 127.0.0.1:53
Nov 27 16:28:19 server1 /kernel: Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:4566
from 127.0.0.1:53
Nov 27 16:28:19 server1 /kernel: Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:1155
from 127.0.0.1:53
Nov 27 16:28:19 server1 /kernel: Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:2761
from 127.0.0.1:53
Nov 27 16:28:20 server1 /kernel: Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:3553
from 127.0.0.1:53

Best,

Thomas S. Crum


___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


port 53 connection attempts from localhost

2004-11-27 Thread Thomas S. Crum - AAA Web Solution, Inc.
Here is the situation, I run bind as a root nameserver and all appears to be
operating normally (no apparent problems).  But, log_in_vain is reporting to
messages a few times per second that port 53 is being queried and nothing
appears to be listing on it. I monitored my forwarders ip addresses and
they reply fine.

I found a reference to search for bind timeout problem, but could find
nothing that looked like any help.

Any ideas?

Couple of stats:
FreeBSD 4.10
BIND 8.3.7-REL
using 2 forwarders
127.0.0.1 in resolve.conf
log_in_vain=YES in rc.conf
allow all from any to any via lo0 in ipfw

server1# tail /var/log/messages
Nov 27 16:28:17 server1 /kernel: Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:3350
from 127.0.0.1:53 Nov 27 16:28:18 server1 /kernel: Connection attempt to UDP
127.0.0.1:1750 from 127.0.0.1:53 Nov 27 16:28:18 server1 /kernel: Connection
attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:4321 from 127.0.0.1:53 Nov 27 16:28:18 server1
/kernel: Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:4071 from 127.0.0.1:53 Nov 27
16:28:18 server1 /kernel: Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:3037 from
127.0.0.1:53 Nov 27 16:28:18 server1 /kernel: Connection attempt to UDP
127.0.0.1:4384 from 127.0.0.1:53 Nov 27 16:28:19 server1 /kernel: Connection
attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:4566 from 127.0.0.1:53 Nov 27 16:28:19 server1
/kernel: Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:1155 from 127.0.0.1:53 Nov 27
16:28:19 server1 /kernel: Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:2761 from
127.0.0.1:53 Nov 27 16:28:20 server1 /kernel: Connection attempt to UDP
127.0.0.1:3553 from 127.0.0.1:53

Best,

Thomas S. Crum


___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Updating packages list (using cvsup?)

2004-11-26 Thread Thomas S. Crum - AAA Web Solution, Inc.
Packages are pre-compiled so there is little ability to configure them,
should you need to. Although I still know many people who prefer using
packages. Do not use sysinstall to accomplish this.  Also, there is no need
to 'download or update' your 'packages'.  Simply follow the below command to
install the current package.

# pkg_add -r some_package

I would recommend ports and cvs to anyone.

Below is a config to install cvsup and run it to update your ports
collection.  Remember though, ports are not precompiled and you will
actually need to move into the /usr/ports/whatever_port/whatever_program dir
to install them.

# pkg_add -r cvsup-without-gui
# cp /usr/share/examples/cvsup/ports-supfile /root/ports-supfile
// change 'changethis' to cvsup2, cvsup3, etc.
# ee /root/ports-supfile
// REBOOT SERVER
# shutdown -r now
// Run CVsup to make ports current. (will take approx. 1 hour over
broadband)
# cvsup -g -L 2 /root/ports-supfile

Also there is a wealth of information in the FreeBSD handbook and I would
consider giving that a read.

Best,

Thomas S. Crum

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Olaf Greve
Sent: Friday, November 26, 2004 8:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Updating packages list (using cvsup?)

Hi all,

I was wondering about a thingy.

Whenever I use sysinstall to add a package, the list seems to be
constantly the same (i.e. often outdated), whereas more recent versions
should be available of several of the packages. Of course I can manually
d/l the packages and if necessary compile them and install them, but I
have also heard of the possibility of using cvsup to automatically
update the packages tree.

Now, I have installed cvsup, and I quickly browsed over the man pages (I
have to admit that I have not yet been able to spend much time on this),
but I was wondering if this is really the best way to go. Sure, it does
automatically update collections, etc., but is this really the handiest
tool out there for this particular task?

If not, can anyone please name me an alternative (approach)?
If it is, OTOH, can anyone please give me some quick pointers for
setting this up correctly, and/or point me to a page where this process
is explained.

Thanks in advance, and cheers!
Olafo


___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]