Re: USB Mouse not working

2008-03-26 Thread Wouter Oosterveld
I've had probably had the same issues with an logitech wheel-mouse (usb):

Mar 24 23:56:55 harare kernel: ums0: 3 buttons and Z dir.

The following xorg-section without any rc.conf moosed stuff got it to work:

Section InputDevice
 Identifier  Mouse1
 Option Protocolauto
 Option Device  /dev/sysmouse
 Option Buttons 5
 Option ZAxisMapping   4 5
EndSection

Hope this helps.

Regards,

Wouter

2008/3/26, Fabio Pennati [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

I am a new FreeBSD user coming from Gentoo. I am not able to get
working an usb optical  wired mouse from Labtec that is working well
with many Linux distro's and WXP too.
I am using a FreeBSD 7.0 standard GENERIC kernel configuration with
all usb devices installed, thus:

  # USB support
  deviceuhci# UHCI PCI-USB interface
  deviceohci# OHCI PCI-USB interface
  deviceehci# EHCI PCI-USB interface (USB 2.0)
  deviceusb# USB Bus (required)
  #deviceudbp# USB Double Bulk Pipe devices
  deviceugen# Generic
  deviceuhid# Human Interface Devices
  deviceukbd# Keyboard
  deviceulpt# Printer
  deviceumass# Disks/Mass storage - Requires scbus
  and da
  deviceums# Mouse

Here is an extract from my rc.conf:

  usbd_enable=YES
  moused_enable=YES
  moused_type=auto
  moused_port=/dev/ums0
  moused_flags=
  usbd_flags=
  moused_nondefault_enable=YES
  moused_ums0_flags=

I tried also to take out from rc.conf any moused-stuff lines but
without no results.
And here is the messages from kernel during boot, probing ums device:

  ums0: vendor 0x1241 product 0x, class 0/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr
  2 on uhub0
  ums0: 3 buttons and Z dir.

This is the xorg.conf, for the part interesting the mouse:

  Section InputDevice
  Identifier  Mouse0
  Driver  mouse
  OptionProtocol Auto
  OptionDevice /dev/sysmouse
  OptionZAxisMapping 4 5 6 7
  EndSection

Furthermore I installed the same mouse with an hw adapter to the
serial port of the PC and obviously it works, of course as pms device,
but very slowly and with no precision.
There is someone that has any idea ?
Thanks, Fabio
  ___
  freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
  http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
  To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: USB Mouse not working

2008-03-26 Thread Wouter Oosterveld
Forgot Driver:

Section InputDevice
 Identifier  Mouse1
 Driver  mouse
 Option Protocolauto
 Option Device  /dev/sysmouse
 Option Buttons 5
 Option ZAxisMapping   4 5
EndSection

2008/3/26, Wouter Oosterveld [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 I've had probably had the same issues with an logitech wheel-mouse (usb):

  Mar 24 23:56:55 harare kernel: ums0: 3 buttons and Z dir.

  The following xorg-section without any rc.conf moosed stuff got it to work:

  Section InputDevice
   Identifier  Mouse1

  Option Protocolauto
   Option Device  /dev/sysmouse

  Option Buttons 5
   Option ZAxisMapping   4 5
  EndSection

  Hope this helps.

  Regards,

  Wouter

  2008/3/26, Fabio Pennati [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 
  I am a new FreeBSD user coming from Gentoo. I am not able to get
  working an usb optical  wired mouse from Labtec that is working well
  with many Linux distro's and WXP too.
  I am using a FreeBSD 7.0 standard GENERIC kernel configuration with
  all usb devices installed, thus:
  
# USB support
deviceuhci# UHCI PCI-USB interface
deviceohci# OHCI PCI-USB interface
deviceehci# EHCI PCI-USB interface (USB 2.0)
deviceusb# USB Bus (required)
#deviceudbp# USB Double Bulk Pipe devices
deviceugen# Generic
deviceuhid# Human Interface Devices
deviceukbd# Keyboard
deviceulpt# Printer
deviceumass# Disks/Mass storage - Requires scbus
and da
deviceums# Mouse
  
  Here is an extract from my rc.conf:
  
usbd_enable=YES
moused_enable=YES
moused_type=auto
moused_port=/dev/ums0
moused_flags=
usbd_flags=
moused_nondefault_enable=YES
moused_ums0_flags=
  
  I tried also to take out from rc.conf any moused-stuff lines but
  without no results.
  And here is the messages from kernel during boot, probing ums device:
  
ums0: vendor 0x1241 product 0x, class 0/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr
2 on uhub0
ums0: 3 buttons and Z dir.
  
  This is the xorg.conf, for the part interesting the mouse:
  
Section InputDevice
Identifier  Mouse0
Driver  mouse
OptionProtocol Auto
OptionDevice /dev/sysmouse
OptionZAxisMapping 4 5 6 7
EndSection
  
  Furthermore I installed the same mouse with an hw adapter to the
  serial port of the PC and obviously it works, of course as pms device,
  but very slowly and with no precision.
  There is someone that has any idea ?
  Thanks, Fabio
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  



-- 
[
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] is binnenkort niet meer,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is mijn nieuwe email-adres.
]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


what is up with ftpd (some questions)

2008-03-26 Thread Wouter Oosterveld
Why are there two ftpd's in FreeBSD RELEASE-7.0 ? There is the
original ftpd and lukemftpd in contrib.

There is a pam_ftpusers which doesn't work with the original ftpd. (I
would like to be able to whitelist).

Lukemftpd isn't updated in a while.

---

Are there any plans to merge some stuff from lukem in the base ftpd?
Are patches to the original ftpd accepted?

Regards,

Wouter
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: what is the meaning of optimization changed from TIME to SPACE

2008-02-19 Thread Wouter Oosterveld
 /storage/pub/www/ram: optimization changed from TIME to SPACE

This is not an error. It probably means the ramdisk changed it's
allocation policy from preserving time to conserving space. Something
what would happen if the data on it gets relatively (against available
mem) big. I guess.

Regards,

Wouter
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


mysqlclient upgrade

2008-02-14 Thread Wouter Oosterveld
Hello people,

Doe anyone have experience upgrading the mysqlclient-4.0.x to
mysqlclient-5.0.x while retaining mysqlserver-4.0.x and linking
php4-mysql-4.4.2_1 against mysqlclient-4.0.x.

How would I do this? I got some clue about setting PREFIX and
configure option but not much.

FreeBSD example.com 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Fri Oct 21
13:11:05 CEST 2005
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/STOEPTEGEL  i386

mod_auth_mysql-2.20_7 Allows users to use MySQL databases for user
authentication
mysql-client-4.0.26_1 Multithreaded SQL database (client)
mysql-server-4.0.26_1 Multithreaded SQL database (server)
p5-DBD-mysql-3.0002 MySQL driver for the Perl5 Database Interface (DBI)
php4-mysql-4.4.2_1  The mysql shared extension for php

Regards,

Wouter Oosterveld
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Fwd: mysqlclient upgrade

2008-02-14 Thread Wouter Oosterveld
Sorry, I mean linking  php4-mysql-4.4.2_1 against mysqlclient-5.0.x.

Groetjes,

Wouter

-- Forwarded message --
From: Wouter Oosterveld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 14 feb. 2008 17:29
Subject: mysqlclient upgrade
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org


Hello people,

 Doe anyone have experience upgrading the mysqlclient-4.0.x to
 mysqlclient-5.0.x while retaining mysqlserver-4.0.x and linking
 php4-mysql-4.4.2_1 against mysqlclient-5.0.x.

 How would I do this? I got some clue about setting PREFIX and
 configure option but not much.

 FreeBSD example.com 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Fri Oct 21
 13:11:05 CEST 2005
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/STOEPTEGEL  i386

 mod_auth_mysql-2.20_7 Allows users to use MySQL databases for user
 authentication
 mysql-client-4.0.26_1 Multithreaded SQL database (client)
 mysql-server-4.0.26_1 Multithreaded SQL database (server)
 p5-DBD-mysql-3.0002 MySQL driver for the Perl5 Database Interface (DBI)
 php4-mysql-4.4.2_1  The mysql shared extension for php

 Regards,


 Wouter Oosterveld


-- 
[
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] is binnenkort niet meer,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is mijn nieuwe email-adres.
]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


rename and chmod (was: cp -p)

2008-02-08 Thread Wouter Oosterveld
  Now, from a logical point of view, why moving a file into a directory
  doesn't fall into the created into them case?
 
  Because (if on the same filesystem) you don't create a new file. You
  just link the file in the destination dir and unlink the file from the
  source dir.

 Exactly. But from a /*logical*/ point of view, shouldn't this case be
 treated /*as if*/ the file was created inside the target directory?

No. This has nothing to do with logics but with your premisses, the
implementation of mv and standards (IEEE Std 1003.2 (``POSIX.2'')).

It just behaves different than you would expect, but that is no logical error.

  Regards,
 
  Wouter


 --
 Pietro Cerutti

 PGP Public Key:
 http://gahr.ch/pgp





--
[
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] is binnenkort niet meer,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is mijn nieuwe email-adres.
]


-- 
[
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] is binnenkort niet meer,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is mijn nieuwe email-adres.
]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: rename and chmod (was: cp -p)

2008-02-08 Thread Wouter Oosterveld
Now, from a logical point of view, why moving a file into a directory
doesn't fall into the created into them case?

Because (if on the same filesystem) you don't create a new file. You
just link the file in the destination dir and unlink the file from the
source dir.

Regards,

Wouter

2008/2/8, Pietro Cerutti [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 Ok, my view is getting clearer ;-)


 my problem in understanding the semantics of mv, cp -p and the rename(2)
 function seems to be related to the terminology used in chmod(1) man page.

 This is the explanation of setuid (the same holds for setgid):

 Directories with this bit set will force all files and subdirectories
 created in them to be owned by the directory owner and not by the uid of
 the creating process, if the underlying file system supports this feature

 Now, from a logical point of view, why moving a file into a directory
 doesn't fall into the created into them case?


 --
 Pietro Cerutti

 PGP Public Key:
 http://gahr.ch/pgp





-- 
[
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] is binnenkort niet meer,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is mijn nieuwe email-adres.
]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: sendmail should not bind to loopback only

2008-02-04 Thread Wouter Oosterveld
Thank you! That fixed it.

---

I can't find this in the FreeBSD handbook (not in
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/sendmail.html
anyway). Would that be a documentation bug? If not, which piece of
documentation should I have read?

Regards,

Wouter

2008/2/4, Matthew Seaman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: RIPEMD160

 Wouter Oosterveld wrote:
  Hello,
 
  I'm experiencing a weird problem with sendmail on a FreeBSD
  6.3-RELEASE machine (Dell PE2950 AMD64). Sendmail seems to only bind
  to the loopback device while not explicitly configured. I copied the
  config from an 5.3-RELEASE-p9 machine.

 Change

 sendmail_enable=NO

 to

 sendmail_enable=YES

 in /etc/rc.conf

 Cheers,

 Matthew

 - --
 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   Flat 3
   7 Priory Courtyard
 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
   Kent, CT11 9PW, UK
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)
 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

 iD8DBQFHpwVY3jDkPpsZ+VYRA0mlAJ9qjVQtQuril9YkEM6qPvs3Lxmz5wCgsC0E
 j282KOlpThsTCc9zxQSp8eY=
 =w+J0
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-



-- 
[
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] is binnenkort niet meer,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is mijn nieuwe email-adres.
]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Endianness of freeBSD

2008-02-04 Thread Wouter Oosterveld
Endianness depends on the hardware.

In internal kernel structures endianness does not matter, if
communicating with other machines protocols (usually) define a
bitorder.

The c-library and/or systemlibrary contains utility functions for conversion.

Regards,

Wouter Oosterveld

2008/2/4, navneet Upadhyay [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 1. Is FreeBSD little Endian like windows?

 2. Linux is Big endian?

 wrote a code int i = 1;if((i  1) == 0) little else big
 got little on all platforms bsd,linux,windows.

 *Does endianness depends on OS or the hardware?*
 **
 **
 *Thanks,*
 *navneet*
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
[
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] is binnenkort niet meer,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is mijn nieuwe email-adres.
]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


sendmail should not bind to loopback only

2008-02-04 Thread Wouter Oosterveld
Hello,

I'm experiencing a weird problem with sendmail on a FreeBSD
6.3-RELEASE machine (Dell PE2950 AMD64). Sendmail seems to only bind
to the loopback device while not explicitly configured. I copied the
config from an 5.3-RELEASE-p9 machine.

I ofcourse checked the change log of sendmail, /usr/src/UPDATING, the
batbook and google.

Does anyone have an idea what is causing this?

Thanks in advance,

Wouter Oosterveld

sockstat:

(12:46:38)[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ # sockstat -4l
USER COMMANDPID   FD PROTO  LOCAL ADDRESS FOREIGN ADDRESS
(...)
root sendmail   1205  4  tcp4   127.0.0.1:25  *:*
(...)

config sendmail.mc:

VERSIONID(`$FreeBSD: src/etc/sendmail/freebsd.mc,v 1.30.2.4 2007/11/22
16:20:01 gshapiro Exp $')
OSTYPE(freebsd6)
DOMAIN(generic)
FEATURE(access_db, `hash -o -TTMPF /etc/mail/access')
FEATURE(`greet_pause',700)
FEATURE(blacklist_recipients)
FEATURE(local_lmtp)
FEATURE(mailertable, `hash -o /etc/mail/mailertable')
FEATURE(virtusertable, `hash -o /etc/mail/virtusertable')
dnl INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`spamassassin',
`S=local:/var/run/spamass-milter.sock, F=, T=C:15m;S:4m;R:4m;E:10m')
dnl define(`confMILTER_MACROS_CONNECT',`b, j, _, {daemon_name},
{if_name}, {if_addr}')dnl
define(`confCW_FILE', `-o /etc/mail/local-host-names')
FEATURE(`masquerade_entire_domain')dnl
FEATURE(`masquerade_envelope')dnl
FEATURE(`dnsbl',`zen.spamhaus.org')dnl
FEATURE(`delay_checks', `friend')dnl
define(`confME_TOO', `false')dnl
define(`confBIND_OPTS', `WorkAroundBroken')
define(`confNO_RCPT_ACTION', `add-to-undisclosed')
define(`confPRIVACY_FLAGS', `authwarnings,noexpn,novrfy')
DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=IPv4, Family=inet')
DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=IPv6, Family=inet6, Modifiers=O')
MAILER(local)
MAILER(smtp)

grep -i 'o daemon' /etc/mail/sendmail.cf:
O DaemonPortOptions=Name=IPv4, Family=inet
O DaemonPortOptions=Name=IPv6, Family=inet6, Modifiers=O
O DaemonPortOptions=Port=587, Name=MSA, M=E
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]