9.1 - 9.2 upgrade, clang question

2013-10-03 Thread dweimer
When upgrading from 9.1 to 9.2 using source, is there any benefit to 
rebuilding twice, due to the clang version change?  So that the second 
buildworld/kernel is done from the updated clang 3.3, instead of the 
clang 3.1 that was in FreeBSD 9.1?


--
Thanks,
   Dean E. Weimer
   http://www.dweimer.net/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: 9.1 - 9.2 upgrade, clang question

2013-10-03 Thread Volodymyr Kostyrko

03.10.2013 17:36, dweimer wrote:

When upgrading from 9.1 to 9.2 using source, is there any benefit to
rebuilding twice, due to the clang version change?  So that the second
buildworld/kernel is done from the updated clang 3.3, instead of the
clang 3.1 that was in FreeBSD 9.1?


During the buildworld first new compiler is built and then this new 
compiler is used to build everything else.


There may be other reasons to double build though... Maybe after 
cleaning system with `make delete-old`/`make delete-old-libs`?


--
Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org