Re: GRE tunnel problem om FreeBSD 5.2.1
Yes, I did use ipfw before. Now I've moved over to 5.3-RC1 and PF though, gre works like a charm on that config. On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 18:40:42 +0200, Martin Schweizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Erik > > I use pptpd with GRE without problems. First I had also troubles with the ipfw > but now it works great. Do you use also ipfw? > > Am Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 04:09:39PM +0200 Erik Mossberg schrieb: > > > > Hello, > >I have a weird problem with a GRE tunnel, the setup is as follows; > >gre0: flags=b051 > > mtu > >1476 > >tunnel inet 213.67.20.137 --> 194.145.248.113 > >inet 194.145.248.138 --> 194.145.248.137 netmask 0xfffc > >And I've tried both w/ and w/o the link1 option mentioned in the man > >page for gre. > > > > netstat -rn -f inet: > >DestinationGatewayFlagsRefs Use Netif > >Expire > >default213.67.20.1UGS17 19250541rl1 > >127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 1 1802lo0 > >192.168.0 link#1 UC 00rl0 > >192.168.0.54 00:04:75:c8:18:d8 UHLW2 5683090rl0 > >608 > >192.168.0.55 link#1 UHLW2 140rl0 > >192.168.0.91 00:0d:54:9a:d2:d1 UHLW013538rl0 > >1039 > >192.168.0.95 00:0d:88:81:fd:98 UHLW0 766395 > >rl0 5 > >192.168.5.2192.168.5.1UH 0 12 gif2 > >194.145.248.137194.145.248.138UH 0 1177 gre0 > >213.67.20 link#2 UC 00rl1 > >213.67.20.100:10:67:00:c4:39 UHLW10rl1 > >234 > >213.67.20.108 00:10:67:00:c4:39 UHLW0 12rl1 > >822 > >213.67.20.137 127.0.0.1 UGHS0 136lo0 > > > >when I try to ping 194.195.248.137 I have a 95% packet loss, but when > >pinging from remote to 194.145.248.138 works just fine with no packet > >loss. > > > >tcpdump -eni rl1 shows this: > >22:05:55.148354 0:10:a7:13:bf:58 0:10:67:0:c4:39 0800 122: > >213.67.20.137 > 194.145.248.113: gre (frag 49403:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) > >22:05:56.158351 0:10:a7:13:bf:58 0:10:67:0:c4:39 0800 122: > >213.67.20.137 > 194.145.248.113: gre (frag 49410:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) > > > >Sometimes the packet 1 or 2 packets goes through and gets a reply > >though. > > > >I use: > >FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p5 #3: Sun Apr 18 22:25:17 CEST 2004 > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/merltock i386 > > > >When google-ing for this problem I found this: > >http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2004-February/02039 > >4.html > > > >Which seems to be the same problem, can the bug have been brought back > >afterwards? > >I hope I didn't miss any info.. > > > > I will try upgrading to 5.3-RC1, seems to have been alot of fixes > > since then, but I'd be glad for any information what might be the > > cause of this problem. > > > > Thanks. > > > >Regards, > >Erik > > ___ > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > -- > > Regards > > Martin Schweizer > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > PC-Service M. Schweizer GmbH; Gewerbehaus Schwarz; CH-8608 Bubikon > Tel. +41 55 243 30 00; Fax: +41 55 243 33 22; http://www.pc-service.ch; > public key : http://www.pc-service.ch/pgp/public_key.asc; > fingerprint: EC21 CA4D 5C78 BC2D 73B7 10F9 C1AE 1691 D30F D239; > > > ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: GRE tunnel problem om FreeBSD 5.2.1
Hello Erik I use pptpd with GRE without problems. First I had also troubles with the ipfw but now it works great. Do you use also ipfw? Am Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 04:09:39PM +0200 Erik Mossberg schrieb: > Hello, >I have a weird problem with a GRE tunnel, the setup is as follows; >gre0: flags=b051 > mtu >1476 >tunnel inet 213.67.20.137 --> 194.145.248.113 >inet 194.145.248.138 --> 194.145.248.137 netmask 0xfffc >And I've tried both w/ and w/o the link1 option mentioned in the man >page for gre. > > netstat -rn -f inet: >DestinationGatewayFlagsRefs Use Netif >Expire >default213.67.20.1UGS17 19250541rl1 >127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 1 1802lo0 >192.168.0 link#1 UC 00rl0 >192.168.0.54 00:04:75:c8:18:d8 UHLW2 5683090rl0 >608 >192.168.0.55 link#1 UHLW2 140rl0 >192.168.0.91 00:0d:54:9a:d2:d1 UHLW013538rl0 >1039 >192.168.0.95 00:0d:88:81:fd:98 UHLW0 766395 >rl0 5 >192.168.5.2192.168.5.1UH 0 12 gif2 >194.145.248.137194.145.248.138UH 0 1177 gre0 >213.67.20 link#2 UC 00rl1 >213.67.20.100:10:67:00:c4:39 UHLW10rl1 >234 >213.67.20.108 00:10:67:00:c4:39 UHLW0 12rl1 >822 >213.67.20.137 127.0.0.1 UGHS0 136lo0 > >when I try to ping 194.195.248.137 I have a 95% packet loss, but when >pinging from remote to 194.145.248.138 works just fine with no packet >loss. > >tcpdump -eni rl1 shows this: >22:05:55.148354 0:10:a7:13:bf:58 0:10:67:0:c4:39 0800 122: >213.67.20.137 > 194.145.248.113: gre (frag 49403:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) >22:05:56.158351 0:10:a7:13:bf:58 0:10:67:0:c4:39 0800 122: >213.67.20.137 > 194.145.248.113: gre (frag 49410:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) > >Sometimes the packet 1 or 2 packets goes through and gets a reply >though. > >I use: >FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p5 #3: Sun Apr 18 22:25:17 CEST 2004 >[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/merltock i386 > >When google-ing for this problem I found this: >http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2004-February/02039 >4.html > >Which seems to be the same problem, can the bug have been brought back >afterwards? >I hope I didn't miss any info.. > > I will try upgrading to 5.3-RC1, seems to have been alot of fixes > since then, but I'd be glad for any information what might be the > cause of this problem. > > Thanks. > >Regards, >Erik > ___ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -- Regards Martin Schweizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PC-Service M. Schweizer GmbH; Gewerbehaus Schwarz; CH-8608 Bubikon Tel. +41 55 243 30 00; Fax: +41 55 243 33 22; http://www.pc-service.ch; public key : http://www.pc-service.ch/pgp/public_key.asc; fingerprint: EC21 CA4D 5C78 BC2D 73B7 10F9 C1AE 1691 D30F D239; pgpKdQtbmPHKt.pgp Description: PGP signature
GRE tunnel problem om FreeBSD 5.2.1
Hello, I have a weird problem with a GRE tunnel, the setup is as follows; gre0: flags=b051 mtu 1476 tunnel inet 213.67.20.137 --> 194.145.248.113 inet 194.145.248.138 --> 194.145.248.137 netmask 0xfffc And I've tried both w/ and w/o the link1 option mentioned in the man page for gre. netstat -rn -f inet: DestinationGatewayFlagsRefs Use Netif Expire default213.67.20.1UGS17 19250541rl1 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 1 1802lo0 192.168.0 link#1 UC 00rl0 192.168.0.54 00:04:75:c8:18:d8 UHLW2 5683090rl0 608 192.168.0.55 link#1 UHLW2 140rl0 192.168.0.91 00:0d:54:9a:d2:d1 UHLW013538rl0 1039 192.168.0.95 00:0d:88:81:fd:98 UHLW0 766395 rl0 5 192.168.5.2192.168.5.1UH 0 12 gif2 194.145.248.137194.145.248.138UH 0 1177 gre0 213.67.20 link#2 UC 00rl1 213.67.20.100:10:67:00:c4:39 UHLW10rl1 234 213.67.20.108 00:10:67:00:c4:39 UHLW0 12rl1 822 213.67.20.137 127.0.0.1 UGHS0 136lo0 when I try to ping 194.195.248.137 I have a 95% packet loss, but when pinging from remote to 194.145.248.138 works just fine with no packet loss. tcpdump -eni rl1 shows this: 22:05:55.148354 0:10:a7:13:bf:58 0:10:67:0:c4:39 0800 122: 213.67.20.137 > 194.145.248.113: gre (frag 49403:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) 22:05:56.158351 0:10:a7:13:bf:58 0:10:67:0:c4:39 0800 122: 213.67.20.137 > 194.145.248.113: gre (frag 49410:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) Sometimes the packet 1 or 2 packets goes through and gets a reply though. I use: FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p5 #3: Sun Apr 18 22:25:17 CEST 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/merltock i386 When google-ing for this problem I found this: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2004-February/02039 4.html Which seems to be the same problem, can the bug have been brought back afterwards? I hope I didn't miss any info.. I will try upgrading to 5.3-RC1, seems to have been alot of fixes since then, but I'd be glad for any information what might be the cause of this problem. Thanks. Regards, Erik ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
