Re: Installing portupgrade without X.org
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 06:35:27PM -0700, Sergei Gnezdov wrote:
> Manpage does not seem to provide much help and I could not find
> anything related to individual package configuration options such as
> WITHOUT_X11 in the file itself.
pkgtools.conf is just a handy way of storing all of the port-specific
options. If you search the file you will find MAKE_ARGS. There are
some examples in the file and good comments. e.g.
MAKE_ARGS = {
'databases/phpmyadmin' => 'WITH_SUPHP=1',
}
would cause portupgrade to /always/ build databases/phpmyadmin with
WITH_SUPHP=1
> Are there any instructions on pkgtools.conf file?
They're mostly in the pkgtools.conf file itself.
Hope that's some help,
-Lewis Thompson.
--
I was so much older then, I'm younger than that now. --Bob Dylan, 1964.
-| msn:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | url:www.lewiz.org |-
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Installing portupgrade without X.org
On 2005-04-09, Lewis Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Once you've got portupgrade installed you can control individual > ports more specifically through editing pkgtools.conf > in /usr/local/etc. Manpage does not seem to provide much help and I could not find anything related to individual package configuration options such as WITHOUT_X11 in the file itself. Are there any instructions on pkgtools.conf file? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Installing portupgrade without X.org
The only thing that matters is that WITHOUT_X11 is defined. The value itself doesn't matter. On Apr 9, 2005 2:37 PM, Sergei Gnezdov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2005-04-09, Lewis Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 12:26:48PM +0100, Paul Waring wrote: > >> I'm currently trying to get portupgrade onto my new FreeBSD system by > >> running make install clean from /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade (after > >> doing a recent cvsup). Everything seems to go along fine, it starts > >> fetching all the packages it requires and then suddenly I see a > >> download for X.org. > > > > It is not portupgrade that needs X but a dependent port. Which specific > > port? In general just with WITHOUT_X11=1 to /etc/make.conf. > > I think it is > > WITHOUT_X11="YES" > > Does it make any difference? > > ___ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Installing portupgrade without X.org
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 01:37:22PM -0700, Sergei Gnezdov wrote: > On 2005-04-09, Lewis Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 12:26:48PM +0100, Paul Waring wrote: > >> I'm currently trying to get portupgrade onto my new FreeBSD system by > >> running make install clean from /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade (after > >> doing a recent cvsup). Everything seems to go along fine, it starts > >> fetching all the packages it requires and then suddenly I see a > >> download for X.org. > > > > It is not portupgrade that needs X but a dependent port. Which specific > > port? In general just with WITHOUT_X11=1 to /etc/make.conf. > > I think it is > > WITHOUT_X11="YES" > > Does it make any difference? No, the value for such variables is unimportant (WITHOUT_X11="NO" works just as well) Kris pgpPj19i0LhZf.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Installing portupgrade without X.org
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 01:37:22PM -0700, Sergei Gnezdov wrote: > I think it is > > WITHOUT_X11="YES" > > Does it make any difference? Not really. WITHOUT_X11=1 works perfectly for me. Just saves a little time typing it ;) -Lewis Thompson. -- I was so much older then, I'm younger than that now. --Bob Dylan, 1964. -| msn:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | url:www.lewiz.org |- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Installing portupgrade without X.org
On 2005-04-09, Lewis Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 12:26:48PM +0100, Paul Waring wrote: >> I'm currently trying to get portupgrade onto my new FreeBSD system by >> running make install clean from /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade (after >> doing a recent cvsup). Everything seems to go along fine, it starts >> fetching all the packages it requires and then suddenly I see a >> download for X.org. > > It is not portupgrade that needs X but a dependent port. Which specific > port? In general just with WITHOUT_X11=1 to /etc/make.conf. I think it is WITHOUT_X11="YES" Does it make any difference? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Installing portupgrade without X.org
On Apr 9, 2005 5:23 PM, Glenn Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > adding WITHOUT_X11=yes to /etc/make.conf will keep all your ports from > trying to pull in X as a dependency. I use that on all my server systems > for exactly that reason. Cheers Glenn, that solved the problem (I was having the same issue with vim so I was glad to hear of a way to disable it globally). Paul -- Rogue Tory www.roguetory.org.uk ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Installing portupgrade without X.org
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 12:26:48PM +0100, Paul Waring wrote: > I'm currently trying to get portupgrade onto my new FreeBSD system by > running make install clean from /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade (after > doing a recent cvsup). Everything seems to go along fine, it starts > fetching all the packages it requires and then suddenly I see a > download for X.org. It is not portupgrade that needs X but a dependent port. Which specific port? In general just with WITHOUT_X11=1 to /etc/make.conf. Once you've got portupgrade installed you can control individual ports more specifically through editing pkgtools.conf in /usr/local/etc. -Lewis Thompson. -- I was so much older then, I'm younger than that now. --Bob Dylan, 1964. -| msn:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | url:www.lewiz.org |- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Installing portupgrade without X.org
Hey Paul From what I remember portupgrade does not use x-libs. But your culprit might be ruby or bzip because they are the dependencies for this pkg and those might require some kind of x-libs to run. You might want to look into the makefiles for each dependency and looking if it's using X in any ways. And seeing there if you can disable it. --Roman Paul Waring wrote: I'm currently trying to get portupgrade onto my new FreeBSD system by running make install clean from /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade (after doing a recent cvsup). Everything seems to go along fine, it starts fetching all the packages it requires and then suddenly I see a download for X.org. This is a server system and there's no monitor attached so installing X is a bit pointless and a waste of time for me, but I don't know how to say "install this port *without* X dependancies" as this is the first time I've come across this problem (when I installed cvsup I used the -without-gui port so it wasn't a problem). I've searched around but the only relevant material I've managed to find is something about installing the JDK without X.org which seems to be specific to that case and all the other results seem to be about problems installing X which I don't want to do. I'm fairly new to BSD and I've never got this far setting up a system from scratch before (every other time I've stumbled somewhere on the way) so any advice/pointers would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance. Paul ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Installing portupgrade without X.org
I'm currently trying to get portupgrade onto my new FreeBSD system by running make install clean from /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade (after doing a recent cvsup). Everything seems to go along fine, it starts fetching all the packages it requires and then suddenly I see a download for X.org. This is a server system and there's no monitor attached so installing X is a bit pointless and a waste of time for me, but I don't know how to say "install this port *without* X dependancies" as this is the first time I've come across this problem (when I installed cvsup I used the -without-gui port so it wasn't a problem). I've searched around but the only relevant material I've managed to find is something about installing the JDK without X.org which seems to be specific to that case and all the other results seem to be about problems installing X which I don't want to do. I'm fairly new to BSD and I've never got this far setting up a system from scratch before (every other time I've stumbled somewhere on the way) so any advice/pointers would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance. Paul -- Rogue Tory www.roguetory.org.uk ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
