Re: Kernel SMB performance
At 09:08 AM 11/21/2008, Ansar Mohammed wrote: Hello all We are considering using an application that uses FreeBSD web servers in front of Windows file servers. How reliable/scalable is the kernel SMB module? You may want to use FreeNAS which is made for NAS using FreeBSD. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kernel SMB performance
Hello all We are considering using an application that uses FreeBSD web servers in front of Windows file servers. How reliable/scalable is the kernel SMB module? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Kernel SMB performance
We are considering using an application that uses FreeBSD web servers in front of Windows file servers. How reliable/scalable is the kernel SMB module? no idea. it worked many times when i wanted to fetch few files from windows. but i don't think anyone really cares very much about it being very well tested, bug free and high performance (i may be wrong here). it's not the way unix is used in normal cases :) (reverse is true) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Kernel SMB performance
We are considering using an application that uses FreeBSD web servers in front of Windows file servers. How reliable/scalable is the kernel SMB module? no idea. it worked many times when i wanted to fetch few files from windows. but i don't think anyone really cares very much about it being very well tested, bug free and high performance (i may be wrong here). I think you are. We should care about a KERNEL module being bug free and high performance. If not, hey why not just use DOS. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Kernel SMB performance
2008/11/21 Ansar Mohammed [EMAIL PROTECTED] I think you are. We should care about a KERNEL module being bug free and high performance. Agreed. We did a migration from a Windows email server a while back (about 40,000 mail boxes). As customers logged into the FreeBSD boxes, a process was kicked off to copy email from the Windows box to the FreeBSD boxes, this being done using SMB + some parsing in the script. This worked flawlessly for about 10 million files. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
