Re: Mail system Suggestions
Martin Hepworth wrote: > On a side note, I found Outlook 2003 really shoddy/poor at working with IMAP > based systems, esp when you have lots of rules to run and lots of emails to > download first thing in the morning. > > eg would easily 10 minutes to synchonise, whereas thunderbird takes about 10 > seconds! > > So from now I say Outlook doesn't work with IMAP, but merely tolerates them > ;-( > Yes, Outlook is hard to get along with. I go mental with it a few times a week. Just waiting for the right opportunity and swap it for something else... like Thunderbird. Cheers, Mikhail. -- Mikhail Goriachev Webanoide Telephone: +61 (0)3 62252501 Mobile Phone: +61 (0)4 38255158 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.webanoide.org PGP Key ID: 0x4E148A3B PGP Key Fingerprint: D96B 7C14 79A5 8824 B99D 9562 F50E 2F5D 4E14 8A3B ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Mail system Suggestions
Martin Hudec wrote: > You can give dovecot a try now :), I use it on all mailservers in > production environments. It handles my ~54k mails in my mail account > pretty well (only slowdown is detected if I use gprs connection ~56kbits). > > One good thing that counts in for dovecot is that postfix in its current > 2.3.x line is able to do smtp authentication directly via dovecot (so no > use for sasl* packages) to any backend you use (mysql, ldap etc.) in > your dovecot config. Nice and clean. More info: > http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html#server_dovecot > > Dovecot with its 1.0 version is pretty stable now, I have been using it > since 0.99.x versions (now alpha port is in use, upgrade to beta is > planned). > > Courier-imap is good choice too, I have no objections to it, but my one > subjective one perhaps: in its older versions (3.0.x) it seemed to have > some kind of psychic problems when dealing with Thunderbird mailclients. > Then I switched to Dovecot. Thanks for the info. Cheers, Mikhail. -- Mikhail Goriachev Webanoide Telephone: +61 (0)3 62252501 Mobile Phone: +61 (0)4 38255158 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.webanoide.org PGP Key ID: 0x4E148A3B PGP Key Fingerprint: D96B 7C14 79A5 8824 B99D 9562 F50E 2F5D 4E14 8A3B ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Mail system Suggestions
On a side note, I found Outlook 2003 really shoddy/poor at working with IMAP based systems, esp when you have lots of rules to run and lots of emails to download first thing in the morning. eg would easily 10 minutes to synchonise, whereas thunderbird takes about 10 seconds! So from now I say Outlook doesn't work with IMAP, but merely tolerates them ;-( -- Martin On 7/23/06, Mikhail Goriachev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: jan gestre wrote: > On 7/22/06, Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi, >> I would recommend dovecot. It's capable of both imap as well as pop if >> you later want to add that and can do encrypted versions of those >> protocols >> as well. Dovecot is also in my opinion much easier to configure and less >> resource intensive than other imap servers. >> If i can be of any assistance let me know. >> Thanks. >> Dave. > > > > i second it, dovecot works great, try it. I'm not into starting a flaming session, but dovecot's indexing/caching capabilities are the only things that make it fast. Am I right? Well, it is also written in C. I came across a few posts[1][2], though they're old, saying that everything depends on e-mail clients as well. I'm responsible for 2 courier-imap in production and about to start working on a new one. This and previous threads regarding dovecot caught my attention and it sounds interesting. However, what good is there having indexes on IMAP server and on local machine? I realised that my Thunderbird keeps record of all my folders and their contents. So roughly I've got ~800MB of e-mails on IMAP and 12MB of indexes in Thunderbird's profile. Also, apparently Outlook 2003 caches absolutely everything. I've seen accounts with 2.9GB worth of e-mails on IMAP and generated outlook.pst as big as 950MB. Maybe dovecot's indexing features would be great in webmail environments? Maybe I just got lost somewhere. Any input would be highly appreciated. Cheers, Mikhail. [1] - http://www.mail-archive.com/courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg19821.html [2] - http://www.mail-archive.com/courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg19834.html -- Mikhail Goriachev Webanoide Telephone: +61 (0)3 62252501 Mobile Phone: +61 (0)4 38255158 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.webanoide.org PGP Key ID: 0x4E148A3B PGP Key Fingerprint: D96B 7C14 79A5 8824 B99D 9562 F50E 2F5D 4E14 8A3B ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to " [EMAIL PROTECTED]" ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Mail system Suggestions
Bill Moran wrote: > > I don't know enought about Dovecot in particular to say whether or not > the speed is _purely_ the result of caching (and being written in C). > > But I can state a couple of reasons why the server-side cache helps. > Keep in mind that IMAP is specifically designed as a clieng/server > protocol. I generally have the same mailbox open from three computers: > my home, my work and my laptop. When changes are made from one of these, > the other two need to get synchronized. Like most people, I try to > keep my mails organized into folders that don't get too big, but I still > end up with 1000s of mails in each folder. > > Dovecot keeping a cache/index on the server side allows Dovecot to quickly > provide information when the clients want to sync up. When a mail client > is first started, it needs to do the equivalent of "send me a list of all > the emails in this folder". If Dovecot needs to scan each and every message, > it can be pretty slow, but if it has an index maintained that it can more > or less just ship as is, that's much faster. How often these types of > "overall sync" operations occur under normal usage, I don't know. > > While I'm not an expert, I believe that Courier maintains indexes as well. > Fair enough, thanks for your thoughts. I guess I'll give dovecot a spin when the right time comes (apparently it's still in beta). Meanwhile I'll stick with courier-imap. Cheers, Mikhail. -- Mikhail Goriachev Webanoide Telephone: +61 (0)3 62252501 Mobile Phone: +61 (0)4 38255158 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.webanoide.org PGP Key ID: 0x4E148A3B PGP Key Fingerprint: D96B 7C14 79A5 8824 B99D 9562 F50E 2F5D 4E14 8A3B ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Mail system Suggestions
Mikhail Goriachev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > jan gestre wrote: > > On 7/22/06, Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi, > >> I would recommend dovecot. It's capable of both imap as well as pop if > >> you later want to add that and can do encrypted versions of those > >> protocols > >> as well. Dovecot is also in my opinion much easier to configure and less > >> resource intensive than other imap servers. > >> If i can be of any assistance let me know. > >> Thanks. > >> Dave. > > > > i second it, dovecot works great, try it. > > I'm not into starting a flaming session, but dovecot's indexing/caching > capabilities are the only things that make it fast. Am I right? Well, it > is also written in C. I came across a few posts[1][2], though they're > old, saying that everything depends on e-mail clients as well. > > I'm responsible for 2 courier-imap in production and about to start > working on a new one. This and previous threads regarding dovecot caught > my attention and it sounds interesting. However, what good is there > having indexes on IMAP server and on local machine? > > I realised that my Thunderbird keeps record of all my folders and their > contents. So roughly I've got ~800MB of e-mails on IMAP and 12MB of > indexes in Thunderbird's profile. Also, apparently Outlook 2003 caches > absolutely everything. I've seen accounts with 2.9GB worth of e-mails on > IMAP and generated outlook.pst as big as 950MB. Maybe dovecot's indexing > features would be great in webmail environments? > > Maybe I just got lost somewhere. Any input would be highly appreciated. I don't know enought about Dovecot in particular to say whether or not the speed is _purely_ the result of caching (and being written in C). But I can state a couple of reasons why the server-side cache helps. Keep in mind that IMAP is specifically designed as a clieng/server protocol. I generally have the same mailbox open from three computers: my home, my work and my laptop. When changes are made from one of these, the other two need to get synchronized. Like most people, I try to keep my mails organized into folders that don't get too big, but I still end up with 1000s of mails in each folder. Dovecot keeping a cache/index on the server side allows Dovecot to quickly provide information when the clients want to sync up. When a mail client is first started, it needs to do the equivalent of "send me a list of all the emails in this folder". If Dovecot needs to scan each and every message, it can be pretty slow, but if it has an index maintained that it can more or less just ship as is, that's much faster. How often these types of "overall sync" operations occur under normal usage, I don't know. While I'm not an expert, I believe that Courier maintains indexes as well. -- Bill Moran You will give me the Ring freely? In place of the Dark Lord you will set up a Queen. And I shall not be dark, but beautiful and terrible as the Morning and the Night! Fair as the Sea and the Sun and the Snow upon the Mountain! Dreadful as the Storm and the Lightning! Stronger than the foundations of the earth. All shall love me and despair! Galadriel ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Mail system Suggestions
jan gestre wrote: > On 7/22/06, Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi, >> I would recommend dovecot. It's capable of both imap as well as pop if >> you later want to add that and can do encrypted versions of those >> protocols >> as well. Dovecot is also in my opinion much easier to configure and less >> resource intensive than other imap servers. >> If i can be of any assistance let me know. >> Thanks. >> Dave. > > > > i second it, dovecot works great, try it. I'm not into starting a flaming session, but dovecot's indexing/caching capabilities are the only things that make it fast. Am I right? Well, it is also written in C. I came across a few posts[1][2], though they're old, saying that everything depends on e-mail clients as well. I'm responsible for 2 courier-imap in production and about to start working on a new one. This and previous threads regarding dovecot caught my attention and it sounds interesting. However, what good is there having indexes on IMAP server and on local machine? I realised that my Thunderbird keeps record of all my folders and their contents. So roughly I've got ~800MB of e-mails on IMAP and 12MB of indexes in Thunderbird's profile. Also, apparently Outlook 2003 caches absolutely everything. I've seen accounts with 2.9GB worth of e-mails on IMAP and generated outlook.pst as big as 950MB. Maybe dovecot's indexing features would be great in webmail environments? Maybe I just got lost somewhere. Any input would be highly appreciated. Cheers, Mikhail. [1] - http://www.mail-archive.com/courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg19821.html [2] - http://www.mail-archive.com/courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg19834.html -- Mikhail Goriachev Webanoide Telephone: +61 (0)3 62252501 Mobile Phone: +61 (0)4 38255158 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.webanoide.org PGP Key ID: 0x4E148A3B PGP Key Fingerprint: D96B 7C14 79A5 8824 B99D 9562 F50E 2F5D 4E14 8A3B ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Mail system Suggestions
On 7/22/06, Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I would recommend dovecot. It's capable of both imap as well as pop if you later want to add that and can do encrypted versions of those protocols as well. Dovecot is also in my opinion much easier to configure and less resource intensive than other imap servers. If i can be of any assistance let me know. Thanks. Dave. i second it, dovecot works great, try it. - Original Message - From: "Gerard Seibert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2006 5:50 AM Subject: Mail system Suggestions >I am setting up a simple mail system that will accumulate 20 people. I > already have Postfix installed. I was wondering what users would > suggest to complete the system. I was thinking of Cyrus-Imap or perhaps > Dovecot or maybe something else. I definitely want an imap system. > > > -- > Gerard Seibert > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ___ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to " [EMAIL PROTECTED]" ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Mail system Suggestions
For a small system, Courier-IMAP is easy to set up and the users' mail is stored in their home directories under Maildir. --On July 22, 2006 5:50:10 AM -0400 Gerard Seibert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am setting up a simple mail system that will accumulate 20 people. I already have Postfix installed. I was wondering what users would suggest to complete the system. I was thinking of Cyrus-Imap or perhaps Dovecot or maybe something else. I definitely want an imap system. -- Gerard Seibert [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/
Re: Mail system Suggestions
Hi, I would recommend dovecot. It's capable of both imap as well as pop if you later want to add that and can do encrypted versions of those protocols as well. Dovecot is also in my opinion much easier to configure and less resource intensive than other imap servers. If i can be of any assistance let me know. Thanks. Dave. - Original Message - From: "Gerard Seibert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2006 5:50 AM Subject: Mail system Suggestions I am setting up a simple mail system that will accumulate 20 people. I already have Postfix installed. I was wondering what users would suggest to complete the system. I was thinking of Cyrus-Imap or perhaps Dovecot or maybe something else. I definitely want an imap system. -- Gerard Seibert [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Mail system Suggestions
Gerard Seibert wrote: > I am setting up a simple mail system that will accumulate 20 people. I > already have Postfix installed. I was wondering what users would > suggest to complete the system. I was thinking of Cyrus-Imap or perhaps > Dovecot or maybe something else. I definitely want an imap system. > > A recent discussion on the list showed a lot of support for Dovecot - it should be easy to setup for a single domain. I use Cyrus, but I might try out Dovecot if it supported virtual domains. If you ever need to migrate between various imap servers because you redecide, then you can create a perl script to move the mail using the imap protocol, then you don't need to care what server is running. Cheers, Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: http://www.locolomo.org X.509 Certificate: http://www.locolomo.org/crt/8D03551FFCE04F0C.crt Key ID: 69:79:B8:2C:E3:8F:E7:BE:5D:C3:C3:B1:74:62:B8:3F:9F:1F:69:B9 smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Mail system Suggestions
I am setting up a simple mail system that will accumulate 20 people. I already have Postfix installed. I was wondering what users would suggest to complete the system. I was thinking of Cyrus-Imap or perhaps Dovecot or maybe something else. I definitely want an imap system. -- Gerard Seibert [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
