Re: PostgreSQL uses more memory on 6.1?
On Tue, 23 May 2006 15:37:25 -0500 Kirk Strauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just upgraded from 6-STABLE as of 2006-02-18 to 6-STABLE as of 2006-05-21, > and was surprised to find that PostgreSQL wouldn't start because it > couldn't allocate enough shared memory. Thing is, I didn't make a single > hardware change during the reboot and didn't upgrade any ports on the > machine. > > My emergency fix was to edit postgresql.conf to change shared_buffers from > 8192 to 2048. Unfortunately, that seems to be hurting performance - I'm > getting annoying deadlocks at 4AM whenever multiple daemons start their > overnight batch runs. > > Has anyone else seen this behavior when upgrading from 6.0 to 6.1? Any > ideas for a fix? > > I apologize for not having a logfiles, but I was pretty much in a panic to > get it back up and running ASAP and didn't think about it until it was too > late. Quick patch: Use sysctl to bump up kern.ipc.* values as needed (probably shmmax) You should then be able to return your postgresql.conf values to whatever performs well Ultimate fix: Figure out why these values changed. Most likely the result of a different kernel config file. Either put the workable values in a kernel config that will persist across upgrades, or put them in /etc/sysctl.conf so you don't lose them. -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. IMPORTANT: This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient (or the individual responsible for the delivery of this message to an intended recipient), please be advised that any re-use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is prohibited. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: PostgreSQL uses more memory on 6.1?
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 02:47:54PM -0600, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote: > > On May 23, 2006, at 2:37 PM, Kirk Strauser wrote: > > >I just upgraded from 6-STABLE as of 2006-02-18 to 6-STABLE as of > >2006-05-21, > >and was surprised to find that PostgreSQL wouldn't start because it > >couldn't allocate enough shared memory. Thing is, I didn't make a > >single > >hardware change during the reboot and didn't upgrade any ports on the > >machine. > > > >My emergency fix was to edit postgresql.conf to change > >shared_buffers from > >8192 to 2048. Unfortunately, that seems to be hurting performance > >- I'm > >getting annoying deadlocks at 4AM whenever multiple daemons start > >their > >overnight batch runs. > > > >Has anyone else seen this behavior when upgrading from 6.0 to 6.1? > >Any > >ideas for a fix? > > > Just a guess -- did some kernel default for shared memory change or > did you change your kernel config? Can you rebuild your kernel with > explicit shared memory values? Look in the NOTES in /usr/src/sys/ > conf at the various SHM values Yep, I was thinking along the same lines. The PostgreSQL ports have a pkg-message-server file that may prove helpful, too. > > > not an expert Likewise... -- Daniel Bye PGP Key: http://www.slightlystrange.org/pgpkey-dan.asc PGP Key fingerprint: D349 B109 0EB8 2554 4D75 B79A 8B17 F97C 1622 166A _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) - against HTML, vCards and X - proprietary attachments in e-mail / \ pgpJKYNnJt2fr.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: PostgreSQL uses more memory on 6.1?
On May 23, 2006, at 2:37 PM, Kirk Strauser wrote: I just upgraded from 6-STABLE as of 2006-02-18 to 6-STABLE as of 2006-05-21, and was surprised to find that PostgreSQL wouldn't start because it couldn't allocate enough shared memory. Thing is, I didn't make a single hardware change during the reboot and didn't upgrade any ports on the machine. My emergency fix was to edit postgresql.conf to change shared_buffers from 8192 to 2048. Unfortunately, that seems to be hurting performance - I'm getting annoying deadlocks at 4AM whenever multiple daemons start their overnight batch runs. Has anyone else seen this behavior when upgrading from 6.0 to 6.1? Any ideas for a fix? Just a guess -- did some kernel default for shared memory change or did you change your kernel config? Can you rebuild your kernel with explicit shared memory values? Look in the NOTES in /usr/src/sys/ conf at the various SHM values not an expert Chad --- Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC Your Web App and Email hosting provider chad at shire.net ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
PostgreSQL uses more memory on 6.1?
I just upgraded from 6-STABLE as of 2006-02-18 to 6-STABLE as of 2006-05-21, and was surprised to find that PostgreSQL wouldn't start because it couldn't allocate enough shared memory. Thing is, I didn't make a single hardware change during the reboot and didn't upgrade any ports on the machine. My emergency fix was to edit postgresql.conf to change shared_buffers from 8192 to 2048. Unfortunately, that seems to be hurting performance - I'm getting annoying deadlocks at 4AM whenever multiple daemons start their overnight batch runs. Has anyone else seen this behavior when upgrading from 6.0 to 6.1? Any ideas for a fix? I apologize for not having a logfiles, but I was pretty much in a panic to get it back up and running ASAP and didn't think about it until it was too late. -- Kirk Strauser ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
