Re: FreeBSD 7.0: which distribution

2008-12-02 Thread Ebbe Hjorth
2008/12/2 Pieter Donche [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Ebbe Hjorth wrote:

 Hi,
 All new XEON cpus are 64-bit spo use the 64 bit freebsd version.

 So this would point to ia64 distribution?
 But clicking op www.freebsd.com/where.html - Hardware notes/View
 tells for ia64: Currently supported processors are Itanium and Itanium2
 There nothing about Intel XEON ??



I never googled it before, but 2 sec gave me
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/7.0R/hardware.html#PROC-AMD64

So use the amd64 ;)



 368 vs 372 is that the 64 bit is compiled for 64 bit, and uses a little
 more
 space.

 what is 368 vs 372 ??


The size difference you talked about (368 vs 0.372)




 / Ebbe

 2008/12/2 Pieter Donche [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 If motherboad is Supermicro X7SBE XEON 3000 with 2 Quad core processors
 Intel Harpertown E 5405 2.0Ghz 12M cache 1333FSB and 4 x 4Gb memory, what
 distribution of FreeBSD 7.0 applies: i386 or ia64 ?

 Why are the ISO's so different in size between i386 and ia64 (i386:
 disc1,2,3: 534, 728, 368Gb; ia64: 449Gb, 0,372 Gb, 0,372 Gb)
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD 7.0: which distribution

2008-12-02 Thread Ebbe Hjorth
Hi,

All new XEON cpus are 64-bit spo use the 64 bit freebsd version.

368 vs 372 is that the 64 bit is compiled for 64 bit, and uses a little more
space.


/ Ebbe

2008/12/2 Pieter Donche [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 If motherboad is Supermicro X7SBE XEON 3000 with 2 Quad core processors
 Intel Harpertown E 5405 2.0Ghz 12M cache 1333FSB and 4 x 4Gb memory, what
 distribution of FreeBSD 7.0 applies: i386 or ia64 ?

 Why are the ISO's so different in size between i386 and ia64 (i386:
 disc1,2,3: 534, 728, 368Gb; ia64: 449Gb, 0,372 Gb, 0,372 Gb)
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD 7.0: which distribution

2008-12-02 Thread Pieter Donche

On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Ebbe Hjorth wrote:


2008/12/2 Pieter Donche [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Ebbe Hjorth wrote:
Hi,
All new XEON cpus are 64-bit spo use the 64 bit freebsd version.
I never googled it before, but 2 sec gave me
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/7.0R/hardware.html#PROC-AMD64

So use the amd64 ;)


Is the amd64 distribution mature enough, as compared to the i386?
Aren't there any problems to be expected to arrive, months after
initial install and way in the production usage ??
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD 7.0: which distribution

2008-12-02 Thread Wojciech Puchar

So use the amd64 ;)


Is the amd64 distribution mature enough, as compared to the i386?


yes


Aren't there any problems to be expected to arrive, months after
initial install and way in the production usage ??

no.

the only reason that people use FreeBSD/i386 on 64-bit processors is that 
some binary-only drivers are only availaboe for i386.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD 7.0: which distribution

2008-12-02 Thread Pieter Donche

On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Wojciech Puchar wrote:


the only reason that people use FreeBSD/i386 on 64-bit processors is that
some binary-only drivers are only availaboe for i386.


what kind of drivers would be missing for the amd64 distribution ???
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD 7.0: which distribution

2008-12-02 Thread Wojciech Puchar

If motherboad is Supermicro X7SBE XEON 3000 with 2 Quad core processors
Intel Harpertown E 5405 2.0Ghz 12M cache 1333FSB and 4 x 4Gb memory, what
distribution of FreeBSD 7.0 applies: i386 or ia64 ?

Why are the ISO's so different in size between i386 and ia64 (i386: 
disc1,2,3: 534, 728, 368Gb; ia64: 449Gb, 0,372 Gb, 0,372 Gb)


ia64 is itanium.

you need amd64.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: FreeBSD 7.0: which distribution

2008-12-02 Thread Johan Hendriks



 the only reason that people use FreeBSD/i386 on 64-bit processors is that
 some binary-only drivers are only availaboe for i386.

what kind of drivers would be missing for the amd64 distribution ???

Nvidia!!!

Regards,
Johan Hendriks

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.9.12/1824 - Release Date: 2-12-2008 9:31
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Nvidia (Re: FreeBSD 7.0: which distribution)

2008-12-02 Thread Ott Köstner

Johan Hendriks wrote:
  

the only reason that people use FreeBSD/i386 on 64-bit processors is that
some binary-only drivers are only availaboe for i386.
  

what kind of drivers would be missing for the amd64 distribution ???



Nvidia!!!

  
I am one ot these folks, using 32-bit FreeBSD on my desktop, just 
because of Nvidia drivers.


Wanted to ask, maybe somebody here knows, is there any hope to expect 64 
bit Nvidia drivers in some reasonable future? What is the problem with 
Nvidia? Why they do not provide 64 bit drivers?


Regards,
O.K.



--
Testi oma Interneti kiirust / Test Your Internet speed:
http://speedtest.zzz.ee/


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Nvidia (Re: FreeBSD 7.0: which distribution)

2008-12-02 Thread Robert Huff

=?windows-1250?Q?Ott_K=F6stner?= writes:

  I am one ot these folks, using 32-bit FreeBSD on my desktop, just 
  because of Nvidia drivers.
  
  Wanted to ask, maybe somebody here knows, is there any hope to
  expect 64 bit Nvidia drivers in some reasonable future? What is
  the problem with Nvidia? Why they do not provide 64 bit drivers?

For the same reason they don't provide up-to-date i386
drivers.  This is a recurring thread; please search the mailing list
archives.  (Hint: try Zander nvidia as a search term.) 


Robert Huff

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Nvidia (Re: FreeBSD 7.0: which distribution)

2008-12-02 Thread Wojciech Puchar

Nvidia drivers.

Wanted to ask, maybe somebody here knows, is there any hope to expect 64 bit 
Nvidia drivers in some reasonable future? What is the problem with Nvidia? 
Why they do not provide 64 bit drivers?


because there are not enough pressure from clients? (by not buying them)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD 7.0: which distribution

2008-12-02 Thread Pieter Donche

On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Ebbe Hjorth wrote:


Hi,
All new XEON cpus are 64-bit spo use the 64 bit freebsd version.

So this would point to ia64 distribution?
But clicking op www.freebsd.com/where.html - Hardware notes/View
tells for ia64: Currently supported processors are Itanium and Itanium2
There nothing about Intel XEON ??


368 vs 372 is that the 64 bit is compiled for 64 bit, and uses a little more
space.

what is 368 vs 372 ??



/ Ebbe

2008/12/2 Pieter Donche [EMAIL PROTECTED]


If motherboad is Supermicro X7SBE XEON 3000 with 2 Quad core processors
Intel Harpertown E 5405 2.0Ghz 12M cache 1333FSB and 4 x 4Gb memory, what
distribution of FreeBSD 7.0 applies: i386 or ia64 ?

Why are the ISO's so different in size between i386 and ia64 (i386:
disc1,2,3: 534, 728, 368Gb; ia64: 449Gb, 0,372 Gb, 0,372 Gb)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Nvidia (Re: FreeBSD 7.0: which distribution)

2008-12-02 Thread Johan Hendriks

 Nvidia drivers.

 Wanted to ask, maybe somebody here knows, is there any hope to expect 64 bit 
 Nvidia drivers in some reasonable future? What is the problem with Nvidia? 
 Why they do not provide 64 bit drivers?

because there are not enough pressure from clients? (by not buying them)

They missing some things in the kernel of FreeBSD so it has nothing to do with 
nvidia not willing it is FreeBSD who lacks support in the kernel for a 64bit 
NVIDIA driver.

But like said before there are numoures threads about this.
Regards,
Johan Hendriks



No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.9.12/1824 - Release Date: 2-12-2008 9:31
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD 7.0: which distribution

2008-12-02 Thread Valentin Bud
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Johan Hendriks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



 the only reason that people use FreeBSD/i386 on 64-bit processors is that
 some binary-only drivers are only availaboe for i386.

what kind of drivers would be missing for the amd64 distribution ???

 Nvidia!!!

No Nvidia on that particular motherboard so the OP is on the safe side.

@OP: I have just installed FBSD amd 64 2 weeks ago to benefit of +4 GB of RAM
and until now i didn't have any kind of problem in compiling and
running applications.

My box is a web/mail/vpn/router/samba (yes i know there shouldn't be
that many services
on the box, but tell my boss that) and all the apps are working like a charm.

v


 Regards,
 Johan Hendriks

 No virus found in this outgoing message.
 Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
 Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.9.12/1824 - Release Date: 2-12-2008 
 9:31
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD 7.0: which distribution

2008-12-02 Thread Wojciech Puchar

My box is a web/mail/vpn/router/samba (yes i know there shouldn't be
that many services
on the box, but tell my boss that) and all the apps are working like a charm.


his money his problem. overspending on hardware it's quite common, instead 
of paying more employees with the same money.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD 7.0: which distribution

2008-12-02 Thread Matthew Seaman

Pieter Donche wrote:

On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Ebbe Hjorth wrote:


Hi,
All new XEON cpus are 64-bit spo use the 64 bit freebsd version.

So this would point to ia64 distribution?
But clicking op www.freebsd.com/where.html - Hardware notes/View
tells for ia64: Currently supported processors are Itanium and Itanium2
There nothing about Intel XEON ??


No -- ia64 is the Itanium chip.  Use amd64 for Xeons -- it covers all recent
multi-core Intel chips as well as the AMD 64bit processors.

Cheers,

Matthew

--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   7 Priory Courtyard
 Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
 Kent, CT11 9PW



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: FreeBSD 7.0: which distribution

2008-12-02 Thread Matthew Seaman

Pieter Donche wrote:

On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Ebbe Hjorth wrote:


Hi,
All new XEON cpus are 64-bit spo use the 64 bit freebsd version.

So this would point to ia64 distribution?
But clicking op www.freebsd.com/where.html - Hardware notes/View
tells for ia64: Currently supported processors are Itanium and Itanium2
There nothing about Intel XEON ??


No -- ia64 is the Itanium chip.  Use amd64 for Xeons -- it covers all recent
multi-core Intel chips as well as the AMD 64bit processors.

Cheers,

Matthew

--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   7 Priory Courtyard
 Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
 Kent, CT11 9PW



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: FreeBSD 7.0: which distribution

2008-12-02 Thread Matthew Seaman

Pieter Donche wrote:

On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Ebbe Hjorth wrote:


Hi,
All new XEON cpus are 64-bit spo use the 64 bit freebsd version.

So this would point to ia64 distribution?
But clicking op www.freebsd.com/where.html - Hardware notes/View
tells for ia64: Currently supported processors are Itanium and Itanium2
There nothing about Intel XEON ??


No -- ia64 is the Itanium chip.  Use amd64 for Xeons -- it covers all recent
multi-core Intel chips as well as the AMD 64bit processors.

Cheers,

Matthew

--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   7 Priory Courtyard
 Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
 Kent, CT11 9PW



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature