Re: FreeBSD losing market share?

2012-04-09 Thread Polytropon
Tony, I'm always fascinated how people consider market share the
purpose of everyone and everything. FreeBSD is not a profit-oriented
company (it's not even a company in this regards), and you can
hardly _measure_ its market share. Hell, you can't even measure
its _usage share_! Unlike corporations with a certain income model
where unit sales can be counted, you cannot count them for FreeBSD
as anyone can download and install as many copies of it as he
likes. Due to the licensing model, derived works that are turned
into a closed-source project can even be attributed to a different
company (e. g. a FreeBSD-derived OS that is installed into an
embedded system acting as a firewall will sales_units++; for that
company, not for FreeBSD). You have _no_, I repeat NO means
to determine how many FreeBSD systems are currently up and running.
That would be usage share. Market share is a measuring model that
you can't even apply to FreeBSD in my opinion.



On Sun, 8 Apr 2012 15:22:47 +0200, Tony wrote:
 Imagine how FreeBSD's market share and popularity would skyrocket once
 regular people gets access to it.

FreeBSD has no market share, if you apply the term correctly,
as it is not part of the market.



 Low-cost hosting definitely is the way of
 the future.

I'm not sure it is. Even by the means of cloud computing prices
are still rising (due to energy costs increasing), and only efficiency
is a way to chance this trend. Sadly, requirements to not follow this
approach, which makes things becoming more expensive in the future.
Unlimited data is also a thing that, in my opinion, will disappear
in the future. Lean and fast applications will have a renaissance.



 Just look at how well low-cost
 airlineshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_low-cost_airlinesare
 doing.

Are _currently_ doing, but they will sooner or later be out of fuel.
Fuel is becoming more expensive as the available amount is limited.
If you consider such things on the long run, you will surely have
to admit that a short-time strategy (being cheap right now) does
not pay.




-- 
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD losing market share?

2012-04-09 Thread Da Rock

On 04/09/12 16:01, Polytropon wrote:

Tony, I'm always fascinated how people consider market share the
purpose of everyone and everything. FreeBSD is not a profit-oriented
company (it's not even a company in this regards), and you can
hardly _measure_ its market share. Hell, you can't even measure
its _usage share_! Unlike corporations with a certain income model
where unit sales can be counted, you cannot count them for FreeBSD
as anyone can download and install as many copies of it as he
likes. Due to the licensing model, derived works that are turned
into a closed-source project can even be attributed to a different
company (e. g. a FreeBSD-derived OS that is installed into an
embedded system acting as a firewall will sales_units++; for that
company, not for FreeBSD). You have _no_, I repeatNO  means
to determine how many FreeBSD systems are currently up and running.
That would be usage share. Market share is a measuring model that
you can't even apply to FreeBSD in my opinion.



On Sun, 8 Apr 2012 15:22:47 +0200, Tony wrote:

Imagine how FreeBSD's market share and popularity would skyrocket once
regular people gets access to it.

FreeBSD has no market share, if you apply the term correctly,
as it is not part of the market.
And regular people already can access it. They can use it freely as much 
as they like and get free help to boot (though I hope they reciprocate 
in kind in some way). Unlike certain OS you have to actually pay for to 
use and pay to get help, such as a certain popular OS which supposedly 
has 90% market share and gives all a headache... ;)


Community is a so much nicer term for this phenomena.




Low-cost hosting definitely is the way of
the future.

I'm not sure it is. Even by the means of cloud computing prices
are still rising (due to energy costs increasing), and only efficiency
is a way to chance this trend. Sadly, requirements to not follow this
approach, which makes things becoming more expensive in the future.
Unlimited data is also a thing that, in my opinion, will disappear
in the future. Lean and fast applications will have a renaissance.




Just look at how well low-cost
airlineshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_low-cost_airlinesare
doing.

Are _currently_ doing, but they will sooner or later be out of fuel.
Fuel is becoming more expensive as the available amount is limited.
If you consider such things on the long run, you will surely have
to admit that a short-time strategy (being cheap right now) does
not pay.






___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD losing market share?

2012-04-08 Thread Jerry
On Sun, 8 Apr 2012 15:22:47 +0200
Tony articulated:

 Just look at how well low-cost airlines
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_low-cost_airlines are doing.

You seriously want to fly on the airline that has cut everything,
including maintenance to the bare bone? Everyone is not a pauper.
Some of us actually like the amenities that hard work can buy.

-- 
Jerry ♔

Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


RE: FreeBSD losing market share?

2012-04-08 Thread Jay West
Tony wrote...
---
I'm a bit alarmed by the fact that none of the major low-cost Xen VPS-based
hosting providers in the modern web development
scenehttp://rubyonrails.org/screencasts/rails3 (Rackspace,
Linode, SliceHost, Webbynode etc.) offer FreeBSD hosting. Sure there are
some that offer dedicated servers like M5 Hosting, RootBSD, Pair etc. but
those are hard to find and ridiculously expensive.

Why doesn't FreeBSD support Xen?
---

One could also ask why Xen doesn't support FreeBSD ;)

I've been a loyal FreeBSD zealot for decades and I still am. However, I have
to admit, there are two severe shortcomings - not all entirely freebsd's
fault - that keep it out of Xen hosting (and some other high end)
environments. The answer is:

1) No true clustered filesystem (GFS for one example). Takes it out of the
running completely for those environments. Hast is a wonderful step in the
right direction, but really not the answer.
2) Xen - Xen-Tools have not been supported on FreeBSD to this day. Without
it, there's little sense in running FreeBSD in a commercial hosting
environment under XenServer. No live migration, and half the other nice
features aren't available.

If Xen-tools was supported in FreeBSD, I'm sure you'd see it popping up as a
guest in XenServer hosting providers.

J


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD losing market share?

2012-04-08 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 09:37:15AM -0500, Jay West wrote:

 Tony wrote...
 ---
 I'm a bit alarmed by the fact that none of the major low-cost Xen VPS-based
 hosting providers in the modern web development
 scenehttp://rubyonrails.org/screencasts/rails3 (Rackspace,
 Linode, SliceHost, Webbynode etc.) offer FreeBSD hosting. Sure there are
 some that offer dedicated servers like M5 Hosting, RootBSD, Pair etc. but
 those are hard to find and ridiculously expensive.
 
 Why doesn't FreeBSD support Xen?
 ---
 
 One could also ask why Xen doesn't support FreeBSD ;)
 
 I've been a loyal FreeBSD zealot for decades and I still am. However, I have
 to admit, there are two severe shortcomings - not all entirely freebsd's
 fault - that keep it out of Xen hosting (and some other high end)
 environments. The answer is:
 
 1) No true clustered filesystem (GFS for one example). Takes it out of the
 running completely for those environments. Hast is a wonderful step in the
 right direction, but really not the answer.
 2) Xen - Xen-Tools have not been supported on FreeBSD to this day. Without
 it, there's little sense in running FreeBSD in a commercial hosting
 environment under XenServer. No live migration, and half the other nice
 features aren't available.
 
 If Xen-tools was supported in FreeBSD, I'm sure you'd see it popping up as a
 guest in XenServer hosting providers.


Well, guess you and Tony have some work to do then.
I expect it will be more than a weekend project for you.

jerry


 
 J
 
 
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org