Re: An observation

[Ion-Mihai Tetcu]

On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 23:39:12 +0100
Anthony Atkielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Anthony Atkielski writes:
 
   I put it that way in my reply template, since I normally reply to the
   list, and not to the individual poster, and I get tired of cutting and
   pasting the correct address.

BTW, there's enough MUAs that allow one to map keys combinations to
reply-all, reply-list, reply-sender.

  Actually, that's something different.
 
  My reply template directs the reply to the list, rather than to the
  sender, so that I don't have to change the destination address for every
  post (I never send replies to list messages to the original poster,
  since that creates a lot of overhead for the original poster and a lot
  of duplicated text for the reply).

So you choose to disobey more that one thing from our mailing lists
rules  :-(


-- 
IOnut
Unregistered ;) FreeBSD user


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: An observation

[Anthony Atkielski]

Ion-Mihai Tetcu writes:

 BTW, there's enough MUAs that allow one to map keys combinations to
 reply-all, reply-list, reply-sender.

MUAs allow lots of things, especially the better ones.  MTAs do
likewise.

 So you choose to disobey more that one thing from our mailing lists
 rules  :-(

No.  I've discovered that the reply-to is redirected traffic from
advocacy to questions, however, and I've corrected that.  It was not
clear from the preceding posts that this was the problem.

-- 
Anthony


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]