Re: Cloning a disk -large to small

2007-03-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

On 04/03/07, Warren Block <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On Sun, 4 Mar 2007, Grant Peel wrote:

> I have been researching the use of 'dd' quite a bit lately as I have
> had to clone a newly setup server.

dump/restore is generally a better solution for cloning drives.  On
large drives, dd wastes a lot of time copying empty sectors.



Also, your disk label would be wrong, albeit correctable,
though by that time, you may as well have just manually
redone it.

--
--
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Cloning a disk -large to small

2007-03-04 Thread Warren Block

On Sun, 4 Mar 2007, Grant Peel wrote:

I have been researching the use of 'dd' quite a bit lately as I have 
had to clone a newly setup server.


dump/restore is generally a better solution for cloning drives.  On 
large drives, dd wastes a lot of time copying empty sectors.


I was wondering though, if one had a newly setup disk on a 74 GB SCSI 
dirve, is there some know turning that can be done to clone it to a 
smaller drive? Say 36 GB?


http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/disks.html#NEW-HUGE-DISK

Using dump works for going from large to small partitions, too, as long 
as the small partition is big enough to hold all the data.


-Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"