Re: SSH persistent sessions without screen?
On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 09:00 -0700, Chris Telting wrote: > I would like to have something like virtual terminals that continue > running no matter if ssh is connected to them or not. Something like > the screen utility. But I don't want to use screen, tmux? > I'm looking for > something more automated. Maybe even be able to have multiple > connections on different computers. > > I have a number of computers and I like to use each for batch processing > different stuff, especially compiling. I'm mostly interested in > connecting to running sessions from a mobile android phone. I don't > want to keep having to manually login every time through screen and it > should be tolerant of a dropped connection. > > I'm thinking there is probably a way to do this with just ssh. Maybe > have separate sshd daemons running on specific ports. Any ideas? > > Chris > > ___ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: SSH persistent sessions without screen?
* Chris Telting [2011-03-31 09:00:02-0700]: > Something like the screen utility. But I don't want to use screen, > I'm looking for something more automated. tmux can do this, and unlike GNU screen, can be easily scripted. Check it out, we started using it at $work early year and we had about 2 dozen people move permanently from screen (like me, they'd been using it for years) to tmux. Thomas ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: SSH persistent sessions without screen?
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 09:00:02AM -0700, Chris Telting wrote: > I would like to have something like virtual terminals that continue > running no matter if ssh is connected to them or not. Something like > the screen utility. But I don't want to use screen, I'm looking for > something more automated. Maybe even be able to have multiple > connections on different computers. > > I have a number of computers and I like to use each for batch processing > different stuff, especially compiling. I'm mostly interested in > connecting to running sessions from a mobile android phone. I don't > want to keep having to manually login every time through screen and it > should be tolerant of a dropped connection. > > I'm thinking there is probably a way to do this with just ssh. Maybe > have separate sshd daemons running on specific ports. Any ideas? I'm not 100% clear on what you're trying to avoid from GNU Screen, but my first thought when you said you wanted persistent sessions without GNU Screen was "tmux". Count mine as a third vote for tmux, if that suits your needs. Depending on your actual needs, you could also look into using the nohup command. It's not a terminal multiplexer but, in the words of the manpage, it allows you to "run a command immune to hangups, with output to a non-tty". -- Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] pgpqFYnnxccRE.pgp Description: PGP signature
