Re: Wireshark
I have never tried this with OpenSSL so I can't be certain (I just use base openssl) but as long as the libraries are already open, deleting them should be ok since the open file handle will remain valid. Starting a new SSH connection may not work between the deinstall and install step, and apache may get upset if it happens to fork a new process in that time, but overall it should be ok, You'll want to restart sshd and apache after the install is done so they puck up the new version. If you are worried about getting disconnected between the 2 steps run them as a single command "make deinstall; make install" inside screen (ports/sysutils/screen) or something so it will run to completion even if you get disconnected. Grant Peel wrote: OK, So I am using https, and, while doing all this, will be connected via PuTTy through ssh. Will I be disconnected ? Deingstalling the port won't kill my connection or cause general weirdness to people using https? -Grant - Original Message - From: "Chris St Denis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Grant Peel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: ; "Christopher Cowart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 12, 2008 2:46 PM Subject: Re: Wireshark Grant Peel wrote: Hi CHris, Just attempting to install the port. Something I noticed when the install crapped out was that it wanted me to use the "Force Package Register" for the OpenSSL_Overwrite_Base port. That port was already installed, what would be the correct method to deal with this? -Grant - Original Message - From: "Christopher Cowart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Grant Peel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 6:18 PM Subject: Re: Wireshark ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" I've found this sometimes happens if the port is checking for a specific version of a dependancy and the version you have is older. Therefore the dependency check fails and it tries to install, but the package manager won't let it because of the existing version. You can deinstall OpenSSL_Overwrite_Base first and it will probebly work fine. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -- Chris St Denis Programmer SmarttNet (www.smartt.com) Ph: 604-473-9700 Ext. 200 --- "Smart Internet Solutions For Businesses" ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Wireshark
OK, So I am using https, and, while doing all this, will be connected via PuTTy through ssh. Will I be disconnected ? Deingstalling the port won't kill my connection or cause general weirdness to people using https? -Grant - Original Message - From: "Chris St Denis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Grant Peel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: ; "Christopher Cowart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 12, 2008 2:46 PM Subject: Re: Wireshark Grant Peel wrote: Hi CHris, Just attempting to install the port. Something I noticed when the install crapped out was that it wanted me to use the "Force Package Register" for the OpenSSL_Overwrite_Base port. That port was already installed, what would be the correct method to deal with this? -Grant - Original Message - From: "Christopher Cowart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Grant Peel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 6:18 PM Subject: Re: Wireshark ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" I've found this sometimes happens if the port is checking for a specific version of a dependancy and the version you have is older. Therefore the dependency check fails and it tries to install, but the package manager won't let it because of the existing version. You can deinstall OpenSSL_Overwrite_Base first and it will probebly work fine. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Wireshark
Grant Peel wrote: Hi CHris, Just attempting to install the port. Something I noticed when the install crapped out was that it wanted me to use the "Force Package Register" for the OpenSSL_Overwrite_Base port. That port was already installed, what would be the correct method to deal with this? -Grant - Original Message - From: "Christopher Cowart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Grant Peel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 6:18 PM Subject: Re: Wireshark ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" I've found this sometimes happens if the port is checking for a specific version of a dependancy and the version you have is older. Therefore the dependency check fails and it tries to install, but the package manager won't let it because of the existing version. You can deinstall OpenSSL_Overwrite_Base first and it will probebly work fine. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Wireshark
On Sep 12, 2008, at 5:39 AM, gpeel wrote: On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 19:38:50 -0400, matt donovan wrote On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 7:32 PM, Christopher Cowart < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Grant Peel wrote: Just attempting to install the port. Something I noticed when the install crapped out was that it wanted me to use the "Force Package Register" for the OpenSSL_Overwrite_Base port. That port was already installed, what would be the correct method to deal with this? I usually only see this error with ports we've written in-house. Usually it happens because the dependency check on a specific file is bad. The check fails, which causes the port to believe it needs to install the dependency, but the package registry gets upset because the package is already installed and it doesn't think it needs to be reinstalled. If these are real ports, you might want to report the brokenness. You'll probably find that you can FORCE_PKG_REGISTER=1 and leave it at that (though I typically treat it as a last resort and instead opt for fixing the port). -- Chris Cowart Network Technical Lead Network & Infrastructure Services, RSSP-IT UC Berkeley I wrote this but gmail default reply is not reply-all go to the openssl port and run make replace and it should replace base but I actually don't really suggest it. since I don't really see a need to even from wireshark which I have installed without overwriting openssl_base ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED] " Matt, Chris, First off, thanks for taking the time to reply :-) I am afraid however, that you have completely lost me. This is not the first time I have installed a port, and the reccommendation to use 'FORCE_PACKAGE_REGISTER" has been seen. Unfortunately, I have no idea what port you guys are suggesting is really broken, is it the OpenSSL_Overwrite_Base or the one I am trying to install? If it is the OpenSSL one, can you explain in simple terms how I should deal with it? If you use FORCE_PACKAGE_REGISTER=yes and it still fails take a look to see what is actually installed. pkg_info -ia | grep Open_SSL The suggest installing portupgrade. Once that's complete you can portupgrade the port related to Open_SSL to see if that steps around the issue. m! ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Wireshark
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 19:38:50 -0400, matt donovan wrote > On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 7:32 PM, Christopher Cowart < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Grant Peel wrote: > > > Just attempting to install the port. Something I noticed when the install > > > crapped out was that it wanted me to use the "Force Package Register" for > > > the OpenSSL_Overwrite_Base port. > > > > > > That port was already installed, what would be the correct method to deal > > > with this? > > > > I usually only see this error with ports we've written in-house. Usually > > it happens because the dependency check on a specific file is bad. The > > check fails, which causes the port to believe it needs to install the > > dependency, but the package registry gets upset because the package is > > already installed and it doesn't think it needs to be reinstalled. > > > > If these are real ports, you might want to report the brokenness. You'll > > probably find that you can FORCE_PKG_REGISTER=1 and leave it at that > > (though I typically treat it as a last resort and instead opt for fixing > > the port). > > > > -- > > Chris Cowart > > Network Technical Lead > > Network & Infrastructure Services, RSSP-IT > > UC Berkeley > > > > I wrote this but gmail default reply is not reply-all > > go to the openssl port and run make replace and it should replace > base but I actually don't really suggest it. > > since I don't really see a need to even from wireshark which I have > installed without overwriting openssl_base > ___ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" Matt, Chris, First off, thanks for taking the time to reply :-) I am afraid however, that you have completely lost me. This is not the first time I have installed a port, and the reccommendation to use 'FORCE_PACKAGE_REGISTER" has been seen. Unfortunately, I have no idea what port you guys are suggesting is really broken, is it the OpenSSL_Overwrite_Base or the one I am trying to install? If it is the OpenSSL one, can you explain in simple terms how I should deal with it? TIA, -Grant ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Wireshark
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 7:32 PM, Christopher Cowart < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Grant Peel wrote: > > Just attempting to install the port. Something I noticed when the install > > crapped out was that it wanted me to use the "Force Package Register" for > > the OpenSSL_Overwrite_Base port. > > > > That port was already installed, what would be the correct method to deal > > with this? > > I usually only see this error with ports we've written in-house. Usually > it happens because the dependency check on a specific file is bad. The > check fails, which causes the port to believe it needs to install the > dependency, but the package registry gets upset because the package is > already installed and it doesn't think it needs to be reinstalled. > > If these are real ports, you might want to report the brokenness. You'll > probably find that you can FORCE_PKG_REGISTER=1 and leave it at that > (though I typically treat it as a last resort and instead opt for fixing > the port). > > -- > Chris Cowart > Network Technical Lead > Network & Infrastructure Services, RSSP-IT > UC Berkeley > I wrote this but gmail default reply is not reply-all go to the openssl port and run make replace and it should replace base but I actually don't really suggest it. since I don't really see a need to even from wireshark which I have installed without overwriting openssl_base ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Wireshark
Grant Peel wrote: > Just attempting to install the port. Something I noticed when the install > crapped out was that it wanted me to use the "Force Package Register" for > the OpenSSL_Overwrite_Base port. > > That port was already installed, what would be the correct method to deal > with this? I usually only see this error with ports we've written in-house. Usually it happens because the dependency check on a specific file is bad. The check fails, which causes the port to believe it needs to install the dependency, but the package registry gets upset because the package is already installed and it doesn't think it needs to be reinstalled. If these are real ports, you might want to report the brokenness. You'll probably find that you can FORCE_PKG_REGISTER=1 and leave it at that (though I typically treat it as a last resort and instead opt for fixing the port). -- Chris Cowart Network Technical Lead Network & Infrastructure Services, RSSP-IT UC Berkeley pgpj2qcYkGK8K.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Wireshark
Hi CHris, Just attempting to install the port. Something I noticed when the install crapped out was that it wanted me to use the "Force Package Register" for the OpenSSL_Overwrite_Base port. That port was already installed, what would be the correct method to deal with this? -Grant - Original Message - From: "Christopher Cowart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Grant Peel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 6:18 PM Subject: Re: Wireshark ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Wireshark
Grant Peel wrote: > Hi all, > > I recently became aware of a utility called Wireshark (apparently formerly > 'EtherReal"), and was showing a running copy on Windoze. > > It apprears that it would be awsome for diagnosing network issues (such as > DoS attacks, Email bombs etc. > > My question is: > > Does the version in /usr/ports/net/wireshark require X11 to run, or can it > be run from the command line with straight text output? > > (I dont have/want X on the servers). It looks like the port respects the WITHOUT_X11 knob. I believe you get the command tshark if you don't have the GUI, which can do similar packet analysis and display in text form. I believe tshark can be used almost exactly like tcpdump for watching live traffic, but it can also read in tcpdump trace files. -- Chris Cowart Network Technical Lead Network & Infrastructure Services, RSSP-IT UC Berkeley pgp9eZCzFleoX.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Wireshark
Does the version in /usr/ports/net/wireshark require X11 to run, or can it be run from the command line with straight text output? (I dont have/want X on the servers). -Grant You can use tcpdump and bring the dump file to your local machine where you can use wireshark. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: wireshark
Sorry for my late reply. I have been a bit busy... ] On 7 apr 2008, at 21:21, Lowell Gilbert wrote: "FreeBSD.Arno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hi Lowell, thanks for your response, On 7 apr 2008, at 16:23, Lowell Gilbert wrote: "FreeBSD.Arno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I installed wireshark on my computer and got this error trying to run it: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/libhx509.so.2: Undefined symbol "oid_id_pkcs1_rsaEncryption" That library doesn't even exist on my machine that has wireshark installed from ports. that's strange... what version do you run? i have version 0.99.8 I don't run it, I just built it long enough to check for you. oh, thank you very much for that! I just did a make config, disabling everything and 'make install clean' even now: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ldd /usr/local/bin/wireshark | grep libhx509 libhx509.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libhx509.so.2 (0x2a69b000) I used the default configurations: # This file is auto-generated by 'make config'. # No user-servicable parts inside! # Options for wireshark-0.99.8_2 _OPTIONS_READ=wireshark-0.99.8_2 WITHOUT_RTP=true WITH_SNMP=true WITH_ADNS=true WITH_PCRE=true WITH_IPV6=true i tried compiling with and without all the settings, so far without any success I've found some posts of people reporting the same problem, but none of them mention a solution. http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg10746.html Did anyone solve this problem yet? uname -a: FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #18: Mon Mar 31 17:48:52 CEST 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KERNEL_7 i386 Figure out where that library comes from, and rebuild it and maybe its dependencies? i found there's a bug reported here for subversion, but i don;t have that installed http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=118310 i also found heimdal using this it an people reporting he same error i installed heimdal but the problem remained the same i'll try to figure out why wireshark needs this lib on one machine and not on the other... The key clue is probably in what provides that library. Which is Heimdal, so that *should* provide the library. I did search for heimdal on my system before, but i thought it was a port and not part of the base system My mistake... I'm looking into that now and am building kernel and world from the latest sources atm. I'll post the results when that's done... Did you install wireshark from a package? That may have been built with a different set of options and/or for a different FreeBSD release. I compiled from sources: cd /usr/port/net/wireshark/ make install clean gr Arno ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: wireshark
"FreeBSD.Arno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi Lowell, thanks for your response, > > On 7 apr 2008, at 16:23, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > >> "FreeBSD.Arno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> I installed wireshark on my computer and got this error trying to run >>> it: >>> >>> /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/libhx509.so.2: Undefined symbol >>> "oid_id_pkcs1_rsaEncryption" >> >> That library doesn't even exist on my machine that has wireshark >> installed from ports. >> > that's strange... what version do you run? > i have version 0.99.8 I don't run it, I just built it long enough to check for you. > I just did a make config, disabling everything and 'make install clean' > > even now: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ldd /usr/local/bin/wireshark | grep libhx509 > libhx509.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libhx509.so.2 (0x2a69b000) I used the default configurations: # This file is auto-generated by 'make config'. # No user-servicable parts inside! # Options for wireshark-0.99.8_2 _OPTIONS_READ=wireshark-0.99.8_2 WITHOUT_RTP=true WITH_SNMP=true WITH_ADNS=true WITH_PCRE=true WITH_IPV6=true > >>> I've found some posts of people reporting the same problem, but none >>> of them mention a solution. >>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg10746.html >>> >>> Did anyone solve this problem yet? >>> >>> >>> uname -a: >>> FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #18: Mon Mar 31 17:48:52 >>> CEST 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KERNEL_7 i386 >> >> Figure out where that library comes from, and rebuild it and maybe its >> dependencies? >> >> > i found there's a bug reported here for subversion, but i don;t have > that installed > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=118310 > > i also found heimdal using this it an people reporting he same error > i installed heimdal but the problem remained the same > > i'll try to figure out why wireshark needs this lib on one machine and > not on the other... The key clue is probably in what provides that library. Which is Heimdal, so that *should* provide the library. Did you install wireshark from a package? That may have been built with a different set of options and/or for a different FreeBSD release. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: wireshark
Hi Lowell, thanks for your response, On 7 apr 2008, at 16:23, Lowell Gilbert wrote: "FreeBSD.Arno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I installed wireshark on my computer and got this error trying to run it: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/libhx509.so.2: Undefined symbol "oid_id_pkcs1_rsaEncryption" That library doesn't even exist on my machine that has wireshark installed from ports. that's strange... what version do you run? i have version 0.99.8 I just did a make config, disabling everything and 'make install clean' even now: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ldd /usr/local/bin/wireshark | grep libhx509 libhx509.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libhx509.so.2 (0x2a69b000) I've found some posts of people reporting the same problem, but none of them mention a solution. http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg10746.html Did anyone solve this problem yet? uname -a: FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #18: Mon Mar 31 17:48:52 CEST 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KERNEL_7 i386 Figure out where that library comes from, and rebuild it and maybe its dependencies? i found there's a bug reported here for subversion, but i don;t have that installed http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=118310 i also found heimdal using this it an people reporting he same error i installed heimdal but the problem remained the same i'll try to figure out why wireshark needs this lib on one machine and not on the other... thanks Arno ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: wireshark
"FreeBSD.Arno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I installed wireshark on my computer and got this error trying to run > it: > > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/libhx509.so.2: Undefined symbol > "oid_id_pkcs1_rsaEncryption" That library doesn't even exist on my machine that has wireshark installed from ports. > I've found some posts of people reporting the same problem, but none > of them mention a solution. > http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg10746.html > > Did anyone solve this problem yet? > > > uname -a: > FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #18: Mon Mar 31 17:48:52 > CEST 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KERNEL_7 i386 Figure out where that library comes from, and rebuild it and maybe its dependencies? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
