Re: Compiling kernel with gcc43 [SOLVED]
On Thursday 01 April 2010 16:53:36 Pegasus Mc Cleaft wrote: On Thursday 01 April 2010 15:27:41 Oliver Fromme wrote: Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br wrote: [...] It's compiling right now. I'll post my findings and impressions on results and performance right after the next reboot. So, how is it going? Any benchmarks yet? I'm curious if the new gcc version will really make a significant difference. I would love to see the /etc/make.conf, /etc/src.conf and /etc/libmap.conf files that were used for the build. I have tried compiling in VBox a current kernel and world, but it usually just bombs out for me. I would like to give this a go as well. Peg Well, to tell the truth I wasn't that thrilled with the results. I didn't benchmark anything by my impressions were that at least disk access was a bit slower not only during booting but it was more noticeable to me particularly on a burning DVD session. Of course this is ultra abstract. In all previous experiences I had in burning CD/DVD with k3b, I recollect that during burning, the software buffer and device buffer gouges were always 100%, with the software buffer gouge dropping down occasionally to 89/92%. After recompiling the kernel with gcc43, the software buffer was always empty and the device buffer rarely reached 40/50%. I think (if not mistaken) this means that the device is asking where is my data?? and the OS is not providing it fast enough. I could not get world to build with gcc43 so I gave that up. Then I moved on to VirtualBox. I managed to have it compiled and running. After long trial and error sessions, I could pin point what was breaking compilation and fixed it. Here are the steps: -- Compiling vbox/vbox-devel with gcc43 1) /usr/include/cam/cam.h needed #include stdio.h for FILE define, complained by: work/VirtualBox-3.1.51.r27657_OSE/src/VBox/Main/freebsd/HostHardwareFreeBSD.cpp:47: /usr/include/cam/cam.h:246: error: 'FILE' has not been declared 2)/usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox- ose/work/VirtualBox-3.1.6_OSE/src/VBox/Main/generic/NetIf-generic.cpp needed #include stdio.h because of popen() (this step is ONLY for virtualbox-ose) 3)/usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose(- devel)/work/VirtualBox-3.1.6_OSE/src/VBox/Main/freebsd/NetIf-freebsd.cpp needed #include stdlib.h because of malloc()/free() 4) Config.kmk needed some tweaks: a) line 1750 - $(APPEND) '$@' 'VBOX_GCC_mtune-generic ?= $(call VBOX_GCC_CHECK_CC,-mtune=amdfam10 -D__FreeBSD_cc_version=0,)' to use instructions closer to Phenom and avoid cc complains. b) took out all references to -fformat-extensions and -fno_format- extensions c) Preceeded all relevant locations of /usr/lib \ with /usr/local/lib/gcc43 \ so kbuild searched there for libraries first. (except TEMPLATE_VBOXQT4GUIEXE_LIBPATH !) d) You can use the same Config.kmk for building kmods as well 5) took out -fformat-extensions from src/sys/conf/kern.mk And I left /etc/libmap.conf libgcc_s.so.1 gcc43/libgcc_s.so.1 libgomp.so.1gcc43/libgomp.so.1 libobjc.so.3gcc43/libobjc.so.2 libssp.so.0 gcc43/libssp.so.0 libstdc++.so.6 gcc43/libstdc++.so.6 /etc/make.conf CC=/usr/local/bin/gcc43 CXX=/usr/local/bin/g++43 CPP=/usr/local/bin/cpp43 CFLAGS+=-mssse3 -D__FreeBSD_cc_version=0 CXXFLAGS+=-D__FreeBSD_cc_version=0 CPUTYPE=amdfam10 #MAKEOPTS+= -j4 and /etc/src.conf NO_WERROR= WERROR= -- New problems started to come when I tried to extend this to other ports, breaking a lot of them, to point of making me revert everything back to what it was. In fact I am still in this process right now, and reving a lot of problems to rebuild kde4. This is it for now, guys. If you find anything new, please post. Best of luck, -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since version 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99,7% winfoes FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Compiling kernel with gcc43 [SOLVED] -ADDENDUM
Well, to tell the truth I wasn't that thrilled with the results. I didn't [snip] -- Compiling vbox/vbox-devel with gcc43 1) /usr/include/cam/cam.h needed #include stdio.h for FILE define, complained by: [snip] and /etc/src.conf NO_WERROR= WERROR= -- New problems started to come when I tried to extend this to other ports, [snip] You have to: 1) make patch 2) apply the mods 3) make Best of luck, again -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since version 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99,7% winfoes FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Compiling kernel with gcc43 [SOLVED]
Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br wrote: [...] It's compiling right now. I'll post my findings and impressions on results and performance right after the next reboot. So, how is it going? Any benchmarks yet? I'm curious if the new gcc version will really make a significant difference. Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M. Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606, Geschäftsfuehrung: secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht Mün- chen, HRB 125758, Geschäftsführer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd UNIX was not designed to stop you from doing stupid things, because that would also stop you from doing clever things. -- Doug Gwyn ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Compiling kernel with gcc43 [SOLVED]
On Thursday 01 April 2010 15:27:41 Oliver Fromme wrote: Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br wrote: [...] It's compiling right now. I'll post my findings and impressions on results and performance right after the next reboot. So, how is it going? Any benchmarks yet? I'm curious if the new gcc version will really make a significant difference. I would love to see the /etc/make.conf, /etc/src.conf and /etc/libmap.conf files that were used for the build. I have tried compiling in VBox a current kernel and world, but it usually just bombs out for me. I would like to give this a go as well. Peg ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Compiling kernel with gcc43 [SOLVED]
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Oliver Fromme o...@lurza.secnetix.de wrote: Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br wrote: [...] It's compiling right now. I'll post my findings and impressions on results and performance right after the next reboot. So, how is it going? Any benchmarks yet? I'm curious if the new gcc version will really make a significant difference. I'm not as worried about performance as I am about compatibilty. Various software suites have started using newer GCCisms in their code. One example I can give from the top of my head is Wt (www.webtoolkit.eu), which compiles with 4.4, but not with 4.2. I shamefully haven't dug any deeper to check which particular syntactical construct offended 4.2. Yes, one might say, after all it's the upstream developers who ought to make sure their software compiles on FreeBSD, but some aditional overhead on the shoulders of our port maintainers should be expected. Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M. Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606, Geschäftsfuehrung: secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht Mün- chen, HRB 125758, Geschäftsführer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd UNIX was not designed to stop you from doing stupid things, because that would also stop you from doing clever things. -- Doug Gwyn ___ freebsd-hack...@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- Good, fast cheap. Pick any two. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Compiling kernel with gcc43
2010/3/24 Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br Hi; I followed the instructions from http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/custom-gcc/article.html to see if I can achieve some performance gain (8-STABLE r205630 amd64) and also get a more modern instruction set for my Phenom II (amdfam10), so I've done the following config settings: make.conf .if !empty(.CURDIR:M/usr/ports/*) exists(/usr/local/bin/gcc43) CC=/usr/local/bin/gcc43 CXX=/usr/local/bin/g++43 CPP=/usr/local/bin/cpp43 CFLAGS+=-mssse3 CPUTYPE=amdfam10 .endif libmap.conf libgcc_s.so.1 gcc43/libgcc_s.so.1 libgomp.so.1gcc43/libgomp.so.1 libobjc.so.3gcc43/libobjc.so.2 libssp.so.0 gcc43/libssp.so.0 libstdc++.so.6 gcc43/libstdc++.so.6 buildworld goes on normally it seems, but when I tried to build the kernel, the first stop came from the option used by the kernel build -fformat- extensions, which is not accepted by gcc43, so I took it out of /usr/src/sys/conf/kern.mk, the ONLY place I found it. It seemed to solve the problem until gcc43 stopped because of the -Werror option, which is all over the place!. Funny that gcc42 (used by default) doesn't stop because of this option. Anyway,my question boils down to: Is there a way to build the kernel with gcc43, with minimal tweaking? Am i attempting something out of my league? Thanks, -- Mario Lobo Any suggestions/Comments? Should I just dump the gcc43 idea and try this with clang/llvm? I've seen http://wiki.freebsd.org/BuildingFreeBSDWithClang. Anything else to watch out for when building world/kernel/ports? Thanks, -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since version 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99,7% winfoes FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Compiling kernel with gcc43
If you just want to try it out you could disable -Werror for your own build. The reason that gcc 4.3 fails where 4.2 works fine is that the gcc developers are adding new warnings with every compiler release, so until somebody takes the time to fix all of the new warnings you won't be able to build the kernel with -Werror. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Compiling kernel with gcc43
2010/3/25 Ryan Stone ryst...@gmail.com If you just want to try it out you could disable -Werror for your own build. The reason that gcc 4.3 fails where 4.2 works fine is that the gcc developers are adding new warnings with every compiler release, so until somebody takes the time to fix all of the new warnings you won't be able to build the kernel with -Werror. All right !! Thanks for replying ! There are a lot of locations throughout the source code where -Werror is enabled How can I disable -Werror globally? via src.conf ? will it do it for world/kernel? will this damage the resulting kernel/world binaries? -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since version 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99,7% winfoes FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Compiling kernel with gcc43
-Wnoerror should disable it, but I don't know enough about the FreeBSD build infrastructure to tell you where it needs to go. Worst comes to worst you can just delete all of the -Werrors. Disabling -Werror will not cause any problems. -Werror means treat warnings as errors. It's very useful for development but in your case, where you're starting with a known good source tree with no warnings with earlier compilers, it's not necessary to have the option enabled. If the warnings are pointing to legitimate bugs, those bugs also exist in a kernel built by gcc 4.2, so your kernel can't be any worse than what you already have. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Compiling kernel with gcc43
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:24:10 +0200, Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br wrote: Should I just dump the gcc43 idea and try this with clang/llvm? I've seen http://wiki.freebsd.org/BuildingFreeBSDWithClang. Anything else to watch out for when building world/kernel/ports? ClangBSD had little to no runtime testing, so you should be careful with it. I'm not saying it won't work, but make sure you have backups in case something goes wrong. Also, if you just want to build the kernel, you don't need ClangBSD, you can just install llvm-devel from ports and use make CC=/usr/local/bin/clang buildkernel Some people ran or are running their systems with clang compiled kernel. You should still be careful, and some things (like snd_hda on amd64) are known to have problems. -- Andrius ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Compiling kernel with gcc43
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br wrote: 2010/3/25 Ryan Stone ryst...@gmail.com If you just want to try it out you could disable -Werror for your own build. The reason that gcc 4.3 fails where 4.2 works fine is that the gcc developers are adding new warnings with every compiler release, so until somebody takes the time to fix all of the new warnings you won't be able to build the kernel with -Werror. All right !! Thanks for replying ! There are a lot of locations throughout the source code where -Werror is enabled How can I disable -Werror globally? via src.conf ? will it do it for world/kernel? will this damage the resulting kernel/world binaries? -Wno-error . -Garrett ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Compiling kernel with gcc43
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 02:18:34PM -0300, Mario Lobo wrote: All right !! Thanks for replying ! There are a lot of locations throughout the source code where -Werror is enabled How can I disable -Werror globally? via src.conf ? will it do it for world/kernel? will this damage the resulting kernel/world binaries? You should be able to use NO_WERROR in src.conf to prevent -Werror being used. -- Bruce Cran ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Compiling kernel with gcc43
Wiadomość napisana przez Mario Lobo w dniu 2010-03-25, o godz. 17:24: 2010/3/24 Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br Anyway,my question boils down to: Is there a way to build the kernel with gcc43, with minimal tweaking? Am i attempting something out of my league? This is what I use to compile kernel on 9.0-CURRENT/amd64: CC=/usr/local/bin/gcc44 CXX= /usr/local/bin/g++44 CWARNFLAGS=-Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes \ -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual \ -Wno-pointer-sign -D__FreeBSD_cc_version=0 \ -Wno-unused-function -Wno-inline -Wno-format \ -Wno-uninitialized -Wno-array-bounds -Wno-missing-prototypes Note that this is GCC 4.4.4, installed from ports. Also, this will not compile the world - only the kernel. Also, they were a few fixes to make this work; they were not MFC-ed, iirc; removing -Werror altogether should work around these problems. -- If you cut off my head, what would I say? Me and my head, or me and my body? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Compiling kernel with gcc43 [SOLVED]
On Thursday 25 March 2010 19:12:09 Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote: Wiadomość napisana przez Mario Lobo w dniu 2010-03-25, o godz. 17:24: 2010/3/24 Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br Anyway,my question boils down to: Is there a way to build the kernel with gcc43, with minimal tweaking? Am i attempting something out of my league? This is what I use to compile kernel on 9.0-CURRENT/amd64: CC=/usr/local/bin/gcc44 CXX= /usr/local/bin/g++44 CWARNFLAGS=-Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes \ -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual \ -Wno-pointer-sign -D__FreeBSD_cc_version=0 \ -Wno-unused-function -Wno-inline -Wno-format \ -Wno-uninitialized -Wno-array-bounds -Wno-missing-prototypes Note that this is GCC 4.4.4, installed from ports. Also, this will not compile the world - only the kernel. Also, they were a few fixes to make this work; they were not MFC-ed, iirc; removing -Werror altogether should work around these problems. -- If you cut off my head, what would I say? Me and my head, or me and my body? Adding NO_WERROR= WERROR= to src.conf did it. It's compiling right now. I'll post my findings and impressions on results and performance right after the next reboot. Thanks for all the help and info, Guys !! -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since version 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio YET!!] (99,7% winfoes FREE) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: compiling kernel with PAE
Getting an error when trying to compile a kernel on 5.4 and 6.2 with the PAE option. I've tried NO_MODULES in make.conf as well... se2 -ffreestanding -Werror /usr/src/sys/dev/advansys/advansys.c /usr/src/sys/dev/advansys/advansys.c: In function `adv_action': /usr/src/sys/dev/advansys/advansys.c:260: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/WEBTENT. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. This is a custom kernel build with the QUOTA option, I take out the PAE option and all makes fine. I did a src-all update with RELENG_VER tag prior to building. I assume this is a driver issue compatible with PAE? Also, can I run amd64 release on this Intel Xeon dual proc with 6GB RAM? Thinking about loading 6.3 amd64 if possible. Excuse my ignorance, I am not a hardware guy, I am a programmer. CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.00GHz (3000.12-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0xf41 Stepping = 1 Features=0xbfebfbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,C MOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE Features2=0x641dSSE3,RSVD2,MON,DS_CPL,CNTX-ID,CX16,b14 AMD Features=0x2010NX,LM Logical CPUs per core: 2 According to http://www.freebsd.org/platforms/amd64.html the Intel Xeon (3000-sequence, 5000-sequence, and 7000-sequence) processors use the Intel(R)64 architecture. Therefore if your Intel Xeon is in the 3000-sequence, 5000-sequence or 7000-sequence, then you can use FreeBSD/amd64 and use the memory above 4Gb. IMHO it should be more simple and efficient than compiling a kernel with PAE support. HTH, David -- David Robillard UNIX systems administrator Oracle DBA CISSP, RHCE Sun Certified Security Administrator Montreal: +1 514 966 0122 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: compiling kernel with PAE
On Monday 21 January 2008, David Robillard wrote: Getting an error when trying to compile a kernel on 5.4 and 6.2 with the PAE option. I've tried NO_MODULES in make.conf as well... se2 -ffreestanding -Werror /usr/src/sys/dev/advansys/advansys.c /usr/src/sys/dev/advansys/advansys.c: In function `adv_action': /usr/src/sys/dev/advansys/advansys.c:260: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/WEBTENT. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. This is a custom kernel build with the QUOTA option, I take out the PAE option and all makes fine. I did a src-all update with RELENG_VER tag prior to building. I assume this is a driver issue compatible with PAE? Also, can I run amd64 release on this Intel Xeon dual proc with 6GB RAM? Thinking about loading 6.3 amd64 if possible. Excuse my ignorance, I am not a hardware guy, I am a programmer. CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.00GHz (3000.12-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0xf41 Stepping = 1 Features=0xbfebfbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE, MCA,C MOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE Features2=0x641dSSE3,RSVD2,MON,DS_CPL,CNTX-ID,CX16,b14 AMD Features=0x2010NX,LM Note the LM feature here:^^ This means the CPU supports Long Mode, which basically means the cpu supports the 64bit extensions needed for FreeBSD/amd64. Logical CPUs per core: 2 According to http://www.freebsd.org/platforms/amd64.html the Intel Xeon (3000-sequence, 5000-sequence, and 7000-sequence) processors use the Intel(R)64 architecture. Therefore if your Intel Xeon is in the 3000-sequence, 5000-sequence or 7000-sequence, then you can use FreeBSD/amd64 and use the memory above 4Gb. IMHO it should be more simple and efficient than compiling a kernel with PAE support. HTH, David - Pieter de Goeje ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: compiling kernel with PAE
On Saturday 19 January 2008 06:15:15 pm Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: Getting an error when trying to compile a kernel on 5.4 and 6.2 with the PAE option. I've tried NO_MODULES in make.conf as well... se2 -ffreestanding -Werror /usr/src/sys/dev/advansys/advansys.c /usr/src/sys/dev/advansys/advansys.c: In function `adv_action': /usr/src/sys/dev/advansys/advansys.c:260: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/WEBTENT. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. This is a custom kernel build with the QUOTA option, I take out the PAE option and all makes fine. I did a src-all update with RELENG_VER tag prior to building. I assume this is a driver issue compatible with PAE? Also, can I run amd64 release on this Intel Xeon dual proc with 6GB RAM? Thinking about loading 6.3 amd64 if possible. Excuse my ignorance, I am not a hardware guy, I am a programmer. CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.00GHz (3000.12-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0xf41 Stepping = 1 Features=0xbfebfbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MC A,C MOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE Features2=0x641dSSE3,RSVD2,MON,DS_CPL,CNTX-ID,CX16,b14 AMD Features=0x2010NX,LM Logical CPUs per core: 2 PAE is a horrible hack, and even if you figured out why it won't compile (probably an incompatable driver in your kernel) it's slow. That particular CPU will run FreeBSD/amd64 just fine. (I happen to have one) The drawbacks to FreeBSD/amd64 are mainly in the desktop arena. If this is a server I'd go for it. -- Thanks, Josh Paetzel PGP: 8A48 EF36 5E9F 4EDA 5A8C 11B4 26F9 01F1 27AF AECB signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: compiling kernel problem
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 01:51:42PM -0300, Anton Galitch wrote: Hi I have a problem while compiling my kernel. When I go to /usr/src then make buildkernel ... it says that make doesnt know what to do because buildkernel is invalid option. I downloaded the latest source and still the same. In /usr/src there is only sys/ directory. How did you download the source? There should be a lot more in /usr/src. Roland -- R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) pgp7vkilNDGmt.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: compiling kernel problem
On 5/27/07, Anton Galitch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi I have a problem while compiling my kernel. When I go to /usr/src then make buildkernel ... it says that make doesnt know what to do because buildkernel is invalid option. I downloaded the latest source and still the same. In /usr/src there is only sys/ directory. Thanks for any help. -- http://feudaltimes.com.ar - Webmaster, designer and programmer ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You need to check to do csup -L 2 /usr/share/examples/cvsup/stable-supfile Also choose the mirror you need and edit the stable-supfile. If you are using older version than 6.1 use cvsup. -- Regards, -Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri Arab Portal http://www.WeArab.Net/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: compiling kernel problem
I downloaded the source using sysinstall via ftp -- http://feudaltimes.com.ar - Webmaster, designer and programmer ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[SOLVED] Re: compiling kernel problem
Thanks for your help i could get needed files using csup. On 5/27/07, Anton Galitch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I downloaded the source using sysinstall via ftp -- http://feudaltimes.com.ar - Webmaster, designer and programmer -- http://feudaltimes.com.ar - Webmaster, designer and programmer ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: compiling kernel problem
On Sun, 27 May 2007 20:23:39 +0300 Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/27/07, Anton Galitch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi I have a problem while compiling my kernel. When I go to /usr/src then make buildkernel ... it says that make doesnt know what to do because buildkernel is invalid option. I downloaded the latest source and still the same. In /usr/src there is only sys/ directory. Thanks for any help. -- http://feudaltimes.com.ar - Webmaster, designer and programmer ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You need to check to do csup -L 2 /usr/share/examples/cvsup/stable-supfile Also choose the mirror you need and edit the stable-supfile. If you set the relevant variables in /etc/make.conf, and use make update, then you do not have to edit the sample supfile: From the sample file /usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf (be sure to uncomment anything you change): #SUP_UPDATE= #SUP=/usr/bin/csup #SUPFLAGS= -g -L 2 #SUPHOST=cvsup.uk.FreeBSD.org #SUPFILE=/usr/share/examples/cvsup/standard-supfile #PORTSSUPFILE= /usr/share/examples/cvsup/ports-supfile #DOCSUPFILE= /usr/share/examples/cvsup/doc-supfile If you are using older version than 6.1 use cvsup. FWIW, if you want to checkout the actual CVS repository, you still need to use cvsup as well. Unfortunately, csup does not yet support CVS mode. -- Conrad J. Sabatier [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Compiling Kernel Modules
Hello Lawrence, Wednesday, August 16, 2006, 10:21:27 PM, you wrote: I hope this is the correct list for this question but .. I am trying NOT to compile certain modules when I create my own custom kernel. I thought /etc/make.conf with the directive WITHOUT_MODULES did what I was expecting but it does not. Actually, WITHOUT_MODULES is a list of modules you want to exclude from the build. You are looking for MODULES_OVERRIDE directive. Please refer to the make.conf(5) manual page. So, how do I leave out certain modules when custom compile a new kernel? Thanks .. -- Best regards, Danielmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Compiling Kernel Modules
Daniel Gerzo wrote: Hello Lawrence, Wednesday, August 16, 2006, 10:21:27 PM, you wrote: I hope this is the correct list for this question but .. I am trying NOT to compile certain modules when I create my own custom kernel. I thought /etc/make.conf with the directive WITHOUT_MODULES did what I was expecting but it does not. Actually, WITHOUT_MODULES is a list of modules you want to exclude from the build. You are looking for MODULES_OVERRIDE directive. Please refer to the make.conf(5) manual page. So, how do I leave out certain modules when custom compile a new kernel? Thanks .. CRAP I read it wrong... Thanks Daniel .. LDB ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Compiling Kernel for Computer with 2 CPUs
Hello! You need this option/device in your KERNCONF file: options SMP device apic For better performance comment out SCHED_4BSD: #options SCHED_4BSD And take this: options SCHED_ULE You could also try these optimizations: makeoptions COPTFLAGS=-O2 -pipe -funroll-loops -ffast-math Read this: http://www.de.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig-config.html http://www.silverwraith.com/papers/freebsd-kernel.php Another thing, is it a good box for running a webserver with mysql-database or should I buy one? Normally it is but it depends on the load... And more important than the number of CPUs could be the RAM... Regards, Lukas ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: compiling kernel
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 16:14:25 -0500 Efren Bravo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Trying to compile the kernel I found this problem: My PC has not ISA slot and I want to disable it from /sys/i386/conf/MYKERNEL but on /boot/device.hints I found some devices pointing to isa. from GENERIC # Bus support. Do not remove isa, even if you have no isa slots device isa device eisa device pci normally i only comment out eisa Can I remove those devices declarations? Because for example my pc doesn't have SCSI but what can I do with ata, fdc, ppc, sio, vga, psm and atkbdc devices? Can I also remove them? no scsi ? yes, i think you can remove all scsi-card lines, but some scsi-device lines might be needed for burning cdroms and dvds, R.T. Fine M. see the handbook about burning cd/dvd if you need that ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: compiling kernel
At 02:14 PM 8/30/2005, Efren Bravo wrote: Hi, Trying to compile the kernel I found this problem: My PC has not ISA slot and I want to disable it from /sys/i386/conf/MYKERNEL but on /boot/device.hints I found some devices pointing to isa. Can I remove those devices declarations? Because for example my pc doesn't have SCSI but what can I do with ata, fdc, ppc, sio, vga, psm and atkbdc devices? Can I also remove them? You can remove devices that you don't have, but you need to leave the isa device in the kernel. -Glenn Thanks a lot... ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: compiling kernel
On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 22:14, Efren Bravo wrote: Hi, Trying to compile the kernel I found this problem: My PC has not ISA slot and I want to disable it from /sys/i386/conf/MYKERNEL but on /boot/device.hints I found some devices pointing to isa. Can I remove those devices declarations? Because for example my pc doesn't have SCSI but what can I do with ata, fdc, ppc, sio, vga, psm and atkbdc devices? Can I also remove them? Thanks a lot... Efren, See the handbook: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig-config.html In particular it says to not remove isa support even if you have no isa. Rob ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: compiling kernel
Efren Bravo wrote: Hi, Trying to compile the kernel I found this problem: My PC has not ISA slot and I want to disable it from /sys/i386/conf/MYKERNEL but on /boot/device.hints I found some devices pointing to isa. Can I remove those devices declarations? Because for example my pc doesn't have SCSI but what can I do with ata, fdc, ppc, sio, vga, psm and atkbdc devices? Can I also remove them? Thanks a lot... If you think you have a machine that will run without drivers for an ATA disk controller, a Floppy Disk Controller, a Parallel Port Chipset driver, any serial communications (sio), a video console (vga), a mouse, and a keyboard, then by all means go ahead and try it. BUT if I were you I'd do man ata, man fdc, man ppc, etc. and see what those things do before I remove them from my kernel. ((In other words, leave it all in!!!) Kevin Kinsey ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: compiling kernel
$ which perl5 /usr/local/bin/perl5 $ perl5 --version This is perl, v5.8.5 built for i386-freebsd-64int Copyright 1987-2004, Larry Wall Perl may be copied only under the terms of either the Artistic License or the GNU General Public License, which may be found in the Perl 5 source kit. Complete documentation for Perl, including FAQ lists, should be found on this system using `man perl' or `perldoc perl'. If you have access to the Internet, point your browser at http://www.perl.com/, the Perl Home Page. Thats my info on perl5, which tells me, that i prolly installed it through the ports collection (hence /usr/local...), and that its the perl version 5.8.5 from there... maybe you just havent the right perl installed? but i cant put my hand into the fire for this, after all im new to bsd=) Greetings Oliver Leitner Technical Staff http://www.shells.at On Monday 24 January 2005 15:13, Josip wrote: Let me first just say that I'm new to FreeBSD. I'm tring to compile a custom kernel and when I do make buildkernel KERNCONF=NEWKERN I get this: perl5 /usr/src/sys/kern/vnode_if.pl -h /usr/src/sys/kern/vnode_if.src perl5:No such file or directory. Both files are in the specified dir. When I run the above command manualy it execues OK and creates the file vnode_if.h in pwd. What am I doing wrong? Thanks! PS Also if I do make buildkernel KERNCONF=GENERIC I get the same error! ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: compiling kernel
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 03:13:32PM +0100, Josip wrote: Let me first just say that I'm new to FreeBSD. I'm tring to compile a custom kernel and when I do make buildkernel KERNCONF=NEWKERN I get this: perl5 /usr/src/sys/kern/vnode_if.pl -h /usr/src/sys/kern/vnode_if.src perl5:No such file or directory. Both files are in the specified dir. When I run the above command manualy it execues OK and creates the file vnode_if.h in pwd. What am I doing wrong? Did you run 'make buildworld' first as explained in the docs? Also, you forgot to mention what version of FreeBSD you're running. Kris pgpwXhY9Kg7sk.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: compiling kernel :(
On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 07:30:22PM -0500, Brian G. wrote: im pretty new to freebsd got it about two weeks ago now i've been trying to get kazaa on my box so i have installed wine, but whenever i try to run it i get an error and a question wheter i have added USER_LDT option to my kernel which brings me to my current problem (...) /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_aue.c:769: undefined reference to `mii_phy_probe' if_aue.o: In function `aue_tick': /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_aue.c:1116: undefined reference to `mii_tick' /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_aue.c:1118: undefined reference to `mii_pollstat' if_aue.o: In function `aue_init': (...) # PCI Ethernet NICs that use the common MII bus controller code. # NOTE: Be sure to keep the 'device miibus' line in order to use these NICs! = (...) # ISA Ethernet NICs. # 'device ed' requires 'device miibus' === (...) # USB Ethernet, requires mii (...) But, at all, no device miibus line in your kernel config file - and that's where the above error messages come from. So, please add device miibus again and take care of that sort of warnings, they're there for a reason :) Regards, Martin -- ,,Oh, there's a lot of opportunities, if you're knowing to take them, you know, there's a lot of opportunities, if there aren't you can make them, make or break them!'' (Tennant/Lowe) ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: compiling kernel :(
whenever i try to run it i get an error and a question wheter i have added USER_LDT option to my kernel which brings me to my current problem whenever i attempt to compile my kernel i get this after a while : The answer to your question is in the file you sent: umass.o:/usr/src/sys/dev/usb/umass.c:2683: more undefined references to `xpt_done' follow deviceumass # Disks/Mass storage - Requires scbus and da You have defined umass but the driver specifically says it requires scbus and da which you have not defined. The same is true of your network cards. You have defined ethernet cards whcih require the miibus and yet you have not defined the miibus device in your config file. The answers are there but you need to sit down and actually read the kernel config file. If you randomly delete or include options without reading them then the kernel is not going to compile. -Don ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: compiling kernel with netgraph option
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 30 January 2004 11:56 pm, niraj kumar wrote: 1. how can we compile kernel in freebsd 4.7 with netgraph option. 2 what is the procedure to add ur own module between the lower and the higher node of the ng_ether. 3 where i can find more about this niraj I know this sounds redundant, but your answer might be in the Questions Archive - and consider this: http://www.google.com/search?hl=enlr=ie=ISO-8859-1q=kernel+in+freebsd+4.7+with+netgraphbtnG=Google+Search - -- Best regards, Chris -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8 iQA/AwUBQBs2pw+T/4DAG8NjEQIBIwCeJM0KMzA8Wj0FlYa3CNShuLuYfLAAoIvp W8M+6EJdaCjkKzlk+j6ackL4 =I7xR -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
