Re: semi OT: correct CIDR block?
On Monday 05 March 2012 9:30:01 am Robert Huff wrote: With my brain still on EBADSLEEP, I cannot decide if: 10.0.0.32-10.0.0.63 is correctly described by: 10.0.0.32/27 Anyone? Please? Robert Huff ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org Correct. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: semi OT: correct CIDR block?
jcigar@dev ~ % ipcalc 10.0.0.32-10.0.0.63 deaggregate 10.0.0.32 - 10.0.0.63 10.0.0.32/27 (net-mgmt/ipcalc) On 03/05/2012 15:30, Robert Huff wrote: With my brain still on EBADSLEEP, I cannot decide if: 10.0.0.32-10.0.0.63 is correctly described by: 10.0.0.32/27 Anyone? Please? Robert Huff ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- No trees were killed in the creation of this message. However, many electrons were terribly inconvenienced. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: semi OT: correct CIDR block?
On Monday 05 March 2012 9:30:01 am Robert Huff wrote: With my brain still on EBADSLEEP, I cannot decide if: 10.0.0.32-10.0.0.63 is correctly described by: 10.0.0.32/27 Anyone? Please? Robert Huff ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org Robert, Sent to you directly, as I can't get to the fbsd list. Your CIDR is correct. Best, Dimitri -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: semi OT: correct CIDR block?
On 05/03/2012 14:30, Robert Huff wrote: With my brain still on EBADSLEEP, I cannot decide if: 10.0.0.32-10.0.0.63 is correctly described by: 10.0.0.32/27 Anyone? Please? Robert Huff i cheated a bit but looks good http://jodies.de/ipcalc?host=10.0.0.32mask1=27mask2= ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- - Paul Macdonald IFDNRG Ltd Web and video hosting - t: 0131 5548070 m: 07970339546PLEASE NOTE NEW MOBILE e: p...@ifdnrg.com w: http://www.ifdnrg.com - IFDNRG 40 Maritime Street Edinburgh EH6 6SA - ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: semi OT: correct CIDR block?
Yes. cknipe@amnesiac ~ $ ipcalc 10.0.0.32/27 Address: 10.0.0.321010...001 0 Netmask: 255.255.255.224 = 27 ...111 0 Wildcard: 0.0.0.31 ...000 1 = Network: 10.0.0.32/27 1010...001 0 HostMin: 10.0.0.331010...001 1 HostMax: 10.0.0.621010...001 0 Broadcast: 10.0.0.631010...001 1 Hosts/Net: 30Class A, Private Internet On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com wrote: With my brain still on EBADSLEEP, I cannot decide if: 10.0.0.32-10.0.0.63 is correctly described by: 10.0.0.32/27 Anyone? Please? Robert Huff ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- Regards, Chris Knipe ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: semi OT: correct CIDR block?
On Monday, March 05, 2012 at 14:30:01 UTC, roberth...@rcn.com confabulated: With my brain still on EBADSLEEP, I cannot decide if: 10.0.0.32-10.0.0.63 is correctly described by: 10.0.0.32/27 Anyone? Please? I use the online IP calculator all the time: http://jodies.de/ipcalc?host=10.0.0.32mask1=27mask2= -- If at first you don't succeed... ...so much for skydiving. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: semi OT: correct CIDR block?
On 03/05/12 09:30, Robert Huff wrote: With my brain still on EBADSLEEP, I cannot decide if: 10.0.0.32-10.0.0.63 is correctly described by: 10.0.0.32/27 Anyone? Please? Robert Huff ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org Network = 10.0.0.32 Usable IPs = 10.0.0.33 to 10.0.0.62 for 30 Broadcast = 10.0.0.63 Netmask = 255.255.255.224 Wildcard Mask = 0.0.0.31 Looks pretty good to me. Tim Kellers ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: semi OT: correct CIDR block?
ipsc, from packages or ports, is very useful. ipsc -gch 10.0.0.32/27 Network class:A Network mask: 255.0.0.0 Network mask (hex): FF00 Network address: 10.0.0.32 Subnet bits: 19 Max subnets: 524288 Full subnet mask: 255.255.255.224 Full subnet mask (hex): FFE0 Host bits:5 Hosts per subnet: 32 Bit map: ...sssh IP address: 10.0.0.32 Hexadecimal IP address: A20 Address allocation range: 10.0.0.32 - 10.0.0.63 Full subnet mask: 255.255.255.224 Subnet mask: 0.255.255.224 Subnet ID:0.0.0.32 Network ID: 10.0.0.0 Host ID: 0.0.0.32 Cisco Wildcard: 0.0.0.31 CIDR notation:10.0.0.0 /27 Route/Mask: 10.0.0.0 / 255.255.255.224 Hexadecimal route/mask: A00/ FFE0 Supernet max: 0 On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 6:51 AM, Tim Kellers wall...@smsdesign.org wrote: On 03/05/12 09:30, Robert Huff wrote: With my brain still on EBADSLEEP, I cannot decide if: 10.0.0.32-10.0.0.63 is correctly described by: 10.0.0.32/27 Anyone? Please? Robert Huff __**_ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/**mailman/listinfo/freebsd-**questionshttp://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-** unsubscr...@freebsd.org freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org Network = 10.0.0.32 Usable IPs = 10.0.0.33 to 10.0.0.62 for 30 Broadcast = 10.0.0.63 Netmask = 255.255.255.224 Wildcard Mask = 0.0.0.31 Looks pretty good to me. Tim Kellers __**_ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/**mailman/listinfo/freebsd-**questionshttp://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-** unsubscr...@freebsd.org freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
