Smb is slow by design compared to nfs.
/Leslie
Skickat från min Samsung Mobil
Originalmeddelande
Från: Andrea Venturoli m...@netfence.it
Datum:
Till: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Rubrik: Re: Possibly OT: NFS vs SMB performance
On 07/05/13 20:42, Terje Elde wrote:
On 5. juli 2013, at 18:18, Andrea Venturoli m...@netfence.it wrote:
Is this normal in your experience?
Did you do them in that order, or did you do the smb (slow) one first?
If the slow was first, I'm thinking caching on the server could be a major
factor.
Yesterday I did four test:
_ SMB find resulting in over 10 minutes first time;
_ SMB find resulting in nearly 10 minutes second time;
_ NFS find resulting in a little over 1 minute first time;
_ NFS find resulting in a little less than 1 minute second time.
Today I tried again in reverse order:
_ NFS find took 3 minutes;
_ NFS find again took 21 seconds;
_ SMB find took over 9 minutes;
_ SMB find again took again over 9 minutes.
So, while caching plays a role, it just isn't it.
The server was possibly doing other things, so the above figures might
not be that correct; however a difference in the magnitude order is just
too big (and deterministic) to be considered random noise.
bye Thanks
av.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
