problem compiling OpenOffice-2.0
I tried compiling openoffice 2.0, everything is going fine until this point: = Building project cli_ure = deliver -- version: 1.77 Statistics: Files copied: 0 Files unchanged/not matching: 7 = Building project bridges = /home/oo.o/work/bridges/unotypes - /home/oo.o/work/bridges/source/cpp_uno/gcc3_freebsd_intel dmake: Error -- `../../../unxfbsd.pro/slb/cpp_uno_shared.lib' not found, and can't be made '---* tg_merge.mk *---' ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making /home/oo.o/work/bridges/source/cpp_uno/gcc3_freebsd_intel dmake: Error code 1, while making 'instsetoo_native/prj/build_all' *** Error code 255 Stop in /home/oo.o. PC1# '---* tg_merge.mk *---' I copied /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-2.0-devel/ to /home because of a lack of free hard disk space on / by the way. anyone an Idea what I should do to fix this ? Frank Staals ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
compiling openoffice 1.1.3 error
Hi,
I'm trying to install openoffice 1.1.3 from the ports, but keep getting the
following error message :
checking for X11/extensions/XIElib.h... no
configure: error: Could not compile basic X program.
===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly.
Please direct the output of the failure of the make command to a file, and
then feed that file to the gnomelogalyzer, available from
http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/gnomelogalyzer.sh, which will diagnose the
problem
and suggest a solution. If - and only if - the gnomelogalyzer cannot solve
the problem, report the problem to the FreeBSD GNOME team at
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
and attach
"/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/mozilla/work/mozilla/config.log" and
the output of the failure of the make command. Also, it might be a good idea
to provide an overview of all packages installed on your system (e.g. an `ls
/var/db/pkg`).
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/mozilla.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1.
I'm running 5.3-REL (upgraded/cvsup'ed from 5.2.1) and using Xorg. And here
also the config.log from the mozilla/work dir.
What file(s)/program(s) am I missing here ?
Thanks for the help !
Beni.
/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/mozilla/work/mozilla/config.log :
This file contains any messages produced by compilers while
running configure, to aid debugging if configure makes a mistake.
configure:833: checking host system type
configure:854: checking target system type
configure:872: checking build system type
configure:1980: checking for gcc
configure:2093: checking whether the C compiler (gcc32 -O -pipe ) works
configure:2109: gcc32 -o conftest -O -pipeconftest.c 1>&5
configure:2135: checking whether the C compiler (gcc32 -O -pipe ) is a
cross-compiler
configure:2140: checking whether we are using GNU C
configure:2149: gcc32 -E conftest.c
configure:2168: checking whether gcc32 accepts -g
configure:2204: checking for c++
configure:2236: checking whether the C++ compiler (g++32 -O -pipe ) works
configure:2252: g++32 -o conftest -O -pipe conftest.C 1>&5
configure:2278: checking whether the C++ compiler (g++32 -O -pipe ) is a
cross-compiler
configure:2283: checking whether we are using GNU C++
configure:2292: g++32 -E conftest.C
configure:2311: checking whether g++32 accepts -g
configure:2360: gcc32 -c -O -pipe conftest.c 1>&5
configure:2377: gcc32 -c -O -pipe conftest.c 1>&5
configure:2396: checking for ranlib
configure:2428: checking for as
configure:2469: checking for ar
configure:2510: checking for ld
configure:2551: checking for strip
configure:2592: checking for dlltool
configure:2654: checking whether gcc32 and cc understand -c and -o together
configure:2669: gcc32 -c conftest.c -o conftest.o 1>&5
configure:2670: gcc32 -c conftest.c -o conftest.o 1>&5
configure:2675: cc -c conftest.c 1>&5
configure:2677: cc -c conftest.c -o conftest.o 1>&5
configure:2678: cc -c conftest.c -o conftest.o 1>&5
configure:2739: checking how to run the C preprocessor
configure:2760: gcc32 -E conftest.c >/dev/null 2>conftest.out
configure:2819: checking how to run the C++ preprocessor
configure:2837: g++32 -E conftest.C >/dev/null 2>conftest.out
configure:2873: checking for a BSD compatible install
configure:2926: checking whether ln -s works
configure:2951: checking for gawk
configure:2951: checking for mawk
configure:2951: checking for nawk
configure:2985: checking for xemacs
configure:2985: checking for lemacs
configure:2985: checking for emacs
configure:3026: checking for perl5
configure:3066: checking for minimum required perl version >= 5.004
configure:3076: checking for full perl installation
configure:3089: checking for whoami
configure:3125: checking for autoconf
configure:3161: checking for unzip
configure:3199: checking for zip
configure:3240: checking for makedepend
configure:3275: checking for xargs
configure:3316: checking for gmake
configure:3372: checking whether /usr/local/bin/gmake sets ${MAKE}
configure:3404: checking for X
configure:3718: checking for dnet_ntoa in -ldnet
configure:3737: gcc32 -o conftest -O -pipeconftest.c -ldnet 1>&5
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -ldnet
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
configure: failed program was:
#line 3726 "configure"
#include "confdefs.h"
/* Override any gcc2 internal prototype to avoid an error. */
/* We use char because int might match the return type of a gcc2
builtin and then its argument prototype would still apply. */
char dnet_ntoa();
int main() {
dnet_ntoa()
; return 0; }
configure:3759: checking for dnet_ntoa in -ldnet_stub
configure:3778: gcc32 -o conftest -O -pipeconftest.c -ldnet_stub 1>&5
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -ldnet_stub
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
configure: failed program was:
#line 3767 "configure"
#include "confdefs.h"
/* Override any gcc2 internal prototype to avoid an error. */
/* We use char because int might match the return type of a gcc2
builtin and then its argument prototype would st
Re: compiling openoffice
On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 08:53:23 +0100, Matthew Seaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 28, 2004 at 08:57:12AM +0530, Subhro wrote: > > Well first of all if you are someone who had recently stepped into the > > FreeBSD world then you should NOT be using Beta software. Coming back > > to your point the command you should be using is > > make -DWITHOUT_JAVA=yes > > I'm sorry, but that is completely bogus. The syntax of setting > variables on the make(1) command line is either: > >make -DFOO > > or > >make FOO=bar > > where the first option sets the value of FOO to 1. The OP's problem > is that he's trying to set a variable for which there is no support in > the port's Makefile. > >Cheers, > >Matthew > > -- > Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks > Savill Way > PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow > Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK > > > Thanks for correcting me Matthew. But I guess u could have been a a little more polite. Anyway thanks again. I will make a note of what you said. Regards S. -- Subhro Sankha Kar School of Information Technology Block AQ-13/1 Sector V ZIP 700091 India ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: compiling openoffice
On Sat, Aug 28, 2004 at 08:57:12AM +0530, Subhro wrote: > Well first of all if you are someone who had recently stepped into the > FreeBSD world then you should NOT be using Beta software. Coming back > to your point the command you should be using is > make -DWITHOUT_JAVA=yes I'm sorry, but that is completely bogus. The syntax of setting variables on the make(1) command line is either: make -DFOO or make FOO=bar where the first option sets the value of FOO to 1. The OP's problem is that he's trying to set a variable for which there is no support in the port's Makefile. Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK pgpNdFdQ9G56k.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: compiling openoffice
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 16:56:21 -0400
Osmany Guirola Cruz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> is it posible compile openoffice without install java
> i do this
> %make WITHOUT_JAVA=yes but the port still try to download tha java files
> "apache-ant etc etc etc " i can not download the java files due to
> restrictions of Sun with my domain ".cu" what can i do binaries of
> openoffice does not work because i have 5.3 beta "xorg"
> what should i do
>
> ___
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>
1. Don't hijack unrelated thread.
2. You should have told us exactly what you did. What you typed, what you see on
screen, the
content of related files, etc.
Now, if my guess hits, it could be your choice of openoffice.
% grep JAVA /usr/ports/editors/openoffice*/Makefile
/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.0/Makefile:BUILD_DEPENDS+=
${JAVAVM}:${PORTSDIR}/java/linux-sun-jdk13
/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.0/Makefile:BUILD_DEPENDS+=
${JAVAVM}:${PORTSDIR}/java/jdk13
/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.0/Makefile:JAVAVM= ${JDK13DIR}/bin/java
/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1-devel/Makefile:.if !defined(WITHOUT_JAVA)
/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1-devel/Makefile:USE_JAVA= 1.4+
/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1-devel/Makefile:NO_RUN_DEPENDS_JAVA= yes
/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1-devel/Makefile:.if defined(WITHOUT_JAVA)
/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1-devel/Makefile:.if defined(WITHOUT_JAVA)
/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1-devel/Makefile:CONFIGURE_ARGS+=
--with-jdk-home="${JAVA_HOME}"
/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/Makefile:.if !defined(WITHOUT_JAVA)
/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/Makefile:USE_JAVA=1.4+
/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/Makefile:NO_RUN_DEPENDS_JAVA= yes
/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/Makefile:.if defined(WITHOUT_JAVA)
/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/Makefile:.if defined(WITHOUT_JAVA)
/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/Makefile:CONFIGURE_ARGS+=
--with-jdk-home="${JAVA_HOME}"
%
As you see, there is no WITHOUT_JAVA knob for openoffice-1.0. Neither for
openoffice-2.0-devel,
which could be the cause of mysterious make behavior.
You should have chosen openoffice-1.1-devel or openoffice-1.1 in this case.
horio shoichi
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: compiling openoffice
Well first of all if you are someone who had recently stepped into the FreeBSD world then you should NOT be using Beta software. Coming back to your point the command you should be using is make -DWITHOUT_JAVA=yes You missed out the D. Read the man page for make if you want to know more about it. Regards S. On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 16:56:21 -0400, Osmany Guirola Cruz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > is it posible compile openoffice without install java > i do this > %make WITHOUT_JAVA=yes but the port still try to download tha java files > "apache-ant etc etc etc " i can not download the java files due to > restrictions of Sun with my domain ".cu" what can i do binaries of > openoffice does not work because i have 5.3 beta "xorg" > what should i do > > ___ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > -- Subhro Sankha Kar School of Information Technology Block AQ-13/1 Sector V ZIP 700091 India ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
compiling openoffice
is it posible compile openoffice without install java i do this %make WITHOUT_JAVA=yes but the port still try to download tha java files "apache-ant etc etc etc " i can not download the java files due to restrictions of Sun with my domain ".cu" what can i do binaries of openoffice does not work because i have 5.3 beta "xorg" what should i do ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
